Next Article in Journal
Human–Robot Skill Transferring and Inverse Velocity Admittance Control for Soft Tissue Cutting Tasks
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Preparation Process on the Physicochemical Properties of Activated Carbon Prepared from Corn Stalks
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Comprehensive Analysis of Beekeeping Risks and Validation of Biosecurity Measures against Major Infectious Diseases in Apis mellifera in Europe

1
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana Toscana “M. Aleandri”, Via Appia Nuova 1411, 00178 Rome, Italy
2
Department of Government and Justice Studies, Appalachian State University, 287 Rivers St., Boone, NC 28608, USA
3
Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy
4
Department of Information Systems, Arizona State University, 975 S. Myrtle Ave, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2024, 14(3), 393; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14030393
Submission received: 22 January 2024 / Revised: 7 February 2024 / Accepted: 27 February 2024 / Published: 29 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Farm Animal Production)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: In a collaborative effort, FAO, the International Federation of Beekeepers’ Association “Apimondia”, the Appalachian State University, and the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e Toscana (IZSLT), the FAO Reference Centre for Animal Health and Food Security Discipline Apiculture, health, and biosecurity, designed an online international survey (“Knowledge, Awareness and Practice”-KAP) as a risk assessment tool to validate biosecurity measures able to prevent and control the main honeybee (Apis mellifera subsp.) infectious diseases. Methods: The KAP survey was disseminated through various channels for 14 months (January 2019–March 2020). Beekeepers’ knowledge on nosemosis, American foulbrood (AFB), and European foulbrood (EFB) management was assessed. Beekeepers’ attitudes were investigated by asking them to provide a score called “Acceptance by beekeepers”. Results: Of the 410 respondents, the majority of them (68.3%, n = 252) were from Europe. European beekeepers (n = 252) considered “Highly acceptable” the following practices: removing combs that show signs of dysentery and feeding colonies for nosemosis; the quick identification and management of affected hives for American foulbrood and European foulbrood. Instead, the following practices were considered as not acceptable by beekeepers: for nosemosis, the use of antibiotics and sampling of hive debris for early detection; for American foulbrood and European foulbrood, the shook swarm, the destruction of the whole apiary, as well as their treatment with antibiotics. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the validity of the present “Knowledge, Awareness and Practice” (KAP) survey to validate the best practices for the main infectious honeybee diseases, considering the pragmatic point of view of beekeepers. Sustainable practices for disease control are preferred by the European beekeepers. While having an adequate knowledge base for the early detection of the investigated honeybee diseases, European beekeepers tend to be aware of the health status of their hives, embracing advanced, practice-oriented training. Authors highlight that the selection of practices and their validation should be revised on a regular basis, to be adapted in a timely manner to the current infectious honeybee disease situation, in order to build up a resilient and effective stock of practices.
Keywords: biosecurity measures in beekeeping; nosemosis; American foulbrood; European foulbrood; sustainable beekeeping; KAP survey biosecurity measures in beekeeping; nosemosis; American foulbrood; European foulbrood; sustainable beekeeping; KAP survey

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

De Carolis, A.; Newmark, A.J.; Kim, J.; Song, J.; Pietropaoli, M.; Manara, V.; Gyorffy, A.; Cazier, J.; Formato, G. A Comprehensive Analysis of Beekeeping Risks and Validation of Biosecurity Measures against Major Infectious Diseases in Apis mellifera in Europe. Agriculture 2024, 14, 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14030393

AMA Style

De Carolis A, Newmark AJ, Kim J, Song J, Pietropaoli M, Manara V, Gyorffy A, Cazier J, Formato G. A Comprehensive Analysis of Beekeeping Risks and Validation of Biosecurity Measures against Major Infectious Diseases in Apis mellifera in Europe. Agriculture. 2024; 14(3):393. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14030393

Chicago/Turabian Style

De Carolis, Alessandra, Adam J. Newmark, Jieun Kim, Junxia Song, Marco Pietropaoli, Veronica Manara, Andrea Gyorffy, Joseph Cazier, and Giovanni Formato. 2024. "A Comprehensive Analysis of Beekeeping Risks and Validation of Biosecurity Measures against Major Infectious Diseases in Apis mellifera in Europe" Agriculture 14, no. 3: 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14030393

APA Style

De Carolis, A., Newmark, A. J., Kim, J., Song, J., Pietropaoli, M., Manara, V., Gyorffy, A., Cazier, J., & Formato, G. (2024). A Comprehensive Analysis of Beekeeping Risks and Validation of Biosecurity Measures against Major Infectious Diseases in Apis mellifera in Europe. Agriculture, 14(3), 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14030393

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop