Next Article in Journal
Integration of Image and Sensor Data for Improved Disease Detection in Peach Trees Using Deep Learning Techniques
Previous Article in Journal
Does Addressing Rural Energy Poverty Contribute to Achieving Sustainable Agricultural Development?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Effective Biotic Elicitors for Augmentation of Secondary Metabolite Production in Medicinal Plants

1
Department of Microbiology, School of Applied & Life Sciences, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun 248007, India
2
Faculty of Science, Motherhood University, Roorkee 247661, India
3
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh
4
Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmaceutical Research, GLA University, Mathura 281406, India
5
Integrative Centre for Research & Innovation in Biology, Braj Mohan Jha Science Research & Innovation Foundation, (Satellite Campus), Sector 14 West, Chandigarh 160014, India
6
Department of Pharmacology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, 1340 Jefferson Park Avenue, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
7
Hellenic Agricultural Organization ELGO-DIMITRA, Institute of Olive Tree, Subtropical Crops and Viticulture, Leoforos Karamanli 167, GR-73134 Chania, Greece
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2024, 14(6), 796; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14060796
Submission received: 11 April 2024 / Revised: 16 May 2024 / Accepted: 19 May 2024 / Published: 22 May 2024

Abstract

:
Plants are an essential component of our daily diet, and their nutritional value has been thoroughly studied for many years. The ability of plants to adapt to changing environmental conditions through signaling systems is an essential component of their survival. Plants undergo an array of physiological alterations to respond to stress from biotic sources. Secondary compounds frequently accumulate in crops that are sensitive to stress, particularly those with several eliciting agents or signaling molecules. Plants contain various types of bioactive compounds, including phytosterols, alkaloids, glycosides, and polyphenols, which make them valuable for the food and pharmaceutical industries. The increased production of secondary metabolites via elicitation has opened up a new field of study with the potential to provide substantial financial gains for the pharmaceutical and nutraceutical industries. These elicitors are pharmacological compounds that activate specific transcription factors and up-regulate genes to activate metabolic pathways. Thus, the current review discusses the mechanism of biotic elicitation and various elicitation techniques using biotic (proteins, carbohydrates, rhizobacteria, fungi, and hormones) elicitors that may increase the yield of secondary metabolites, particularly in medicinal plants, which is advantageous to the agrochemical and therapeutic industries.

1. Introduction

Plant parts have been an integral component of our daily food intake and have been extensively researched for their biochemical properties. Primary metabolites, including lipids, glucose, and protein are necessary for life [1]. Plants also produce a wide range of secondary metabolites such as flavonoids, alkaloids, pigments, steroids, quinones, and terpenoids that are utilized as nutritional supplements, colors, flavors, biological pesticides, scents, and agricultural chemicals [2,3]. On the other hand, they do not significantly influence how plants’ fundamental life cycles are regulated. Still, they are considered defensive chemicals in the relationship between plants and their habitats [4]. They also play a vital role in protecting plants from insects, phytopathogens, rodents, herbivores, and plant adaptation to the environment. With a dry mass of less than 1%, the processing of these compounds is incredibly low and largely dependent on the metabolic and development stages of the plant [5,6].
If an elicitor is added to a living system in small amounts, it plays a significant role in adapting plants to stressful conditions by improving the particular biosynthesis compound [4]. They are chemical substances for both abiotic and biotic factors that can promote stress responses in plants and aid in the improved production and agglomeration of secondary metabolites to guarantee that they survive in adverse circumstances, i.e., water scarcity, salinity, and low/high temperature [7].
To increase the synthesis of the aimed secondary metabolite, adding an elicitor also results in the development of a novel compound. This will ultimately result in the creation of innovative chemical models for pharmaceuticals [8]. For instance, only in SA-treated cells, Catharanthus roseus suspension produces 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic-5-O-glucoside [9]. After being treated with MeJA and CuSO4, the hairy roots of Hyoscyamus albus produced four novel solavetivone compounds. It is essential to comprehend the elicitation mechanism at the genetic and proteome levels to achieve targeted improvement in secondary metabolite production by elicitation [10].
These days, several biotechnological tools are used to increase plant productivity. In order to produce massive amounts of data indicating both biotic and abiotic stress, high-throughput technologies, such as next-generation sequencing, microarrays, high-resolution mass spectroscopy combined with high-resolution chromatography and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) instruments, etc., are rapidly evolving [11].
In addition to increasing productivity, elicitation uses plant cell/tissue culture as a model system for regulating metabolic and biochemical pathways through stress induction. This technique may be used to characterize and comprehend the effects of different types of stress on plants [12].
However, it is believed that elicitation is the best method for boosting the creation of advantageous secondary compounds from the activities within cells and organs [13]. Thus, this review aims to discuss the effect of different types of biotic elicitors on the production of secondary compounds of pharmaceutical importance.

2. Mode of Action of Elicitors

The first phase of the plant’s reaction to eliciting agents involves the detection of the stimuli by receptors located in the plasma membrane of plant cells, such as protein kinases (Figure 1). A variety of elicitors may be localized within cells to initiate signaling mechanisms that trigger plant defenses by various mechanisms, such as the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), hypertensive reactions, the expression of defense-related genes, the stimulation and de novo biosynthesis of transcription factors, alterations to the potential of plasma membrane cells, the induction of pathogenesis-related proteins and enzymes involved in oxidative stress protection, increased ion fluxes (Cl- and K+ efflux and Ca2+ influx), fast cell death, problems with protein phosphorylation, lipid oxidation, and protective barriers in the structure. They control the activity of proteins associated with the synthesis of secondary compounds directly [14,15,16].

3. Parameters Affecting Elicitors

Elicitation is a complicated process that is influenced by several variables (Figure 2), including the concentration and specificity of the elicitor, its length, overall time course, development stage, growth regulation, soil type, and nutrient composition. Plant genetics (species and cultivars) influence defensive mechanisms more than the characteristics of an elicitor in terms of how plants respond to them. Secondary metabolite synthesis is significantly influenced by elicitor concentration [17,18].

4. Biotic Elicitors and Their Classification

Elicitors are natural and synthetic chemicals, and their discovery has led to a better understanding of plant signaling pathways, which led to the identification of natural and synthetic compounds that stimulate defensive responses in plants comparable to those generated by infection with a pathogen [19]. Biotic elicitors are compounds of biological origin produced either by pathogens or by the plant itself. Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) are elicitors [20]. These DAMPs act as endogenous elicitors and frequently manifest as danger cues to activate innate defenses in the apoplast [21].
Furthermore, exogenous elicitors, such as bacteria, viruses, infections of herbivores, and fungi, cause plants to produce compounds at the location of a pathogen or herbivore attack. They have receptor-related actions and can activate or deactivate various enzymes or ion channels [10]. Numerous bacterial and fungal diseases produce digestive enzymes, such as polygalacturonase, pieces of a cell wall, and peptides that may hinder or dissolve physical obstacles in plant tissues, such as the central lamella. Gene-specific elicitors are generated by the pathogen’s virulence-related genes [22].

4.1. Proteins

In plant cell cultures, proteins and enzymes serve as biotic elicitors and set off defense responses (Table 1).
Proteins exploit ion channels in the membranes of plant cells to propagate signals that are activated by external stimuli [38]. Plants use proteins that bind to carbohydrates, such as lectins or agglutinins, to defend themselves against other plant species. Phytophthora drechleri, a pathogenic fungus, secretes protein elicitins that induce tobacco leaf necrosis [39]. In plant cell membranes, ionic fluxes play a role in ion channel regulation in response to external stimuli, where protein elicitors are used. According to Zimmermann et al. (1998), the Nicotiana tabacum cell membrane contains the cell wall-degrading enzyme pectolyase, as well as a powerful inducer and membrane depolarizer (chloride efflux). Another enzyme released by Phytophthora cryptogea is called cryptogein [40]. The membrane becomes depolarized as a result. According to many researchers, the fungus Pythium oligandrum secretes a low-molecular-weight protein called oligandrin that makes Lycopersicon esculentum plants resistant to Phytophthora parasitica [41].

4.2. Carbohydrates

Different types of carbohydrates, such as oligogalacturonides (OGAs) and pectic polysaccharides, also serve as elicitor molecules (Table 1). During the development of Glycine max cotyledons and defensive interactions with Nicotiana tabacam, OGAs aid in the production of phytoalexins. Chitin, an essential element of fungal cell walls, functions as a potent trigger signal in several plant-based systems [42]. In addition, they participate in the overproduction of secondary compounds in vegetative cell cultures. Using specific carbohydrate elicitors, Ebel et al. (1986) investigated phytoalexin synthesis in cultured soybean cells [43].

4.3. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR)

The production of secondary compounds can be increased by the pharmacological effects of pathogenic microorganisms or other biological elicitors (Figure 3; Table 2). Plant rhizosphere-colonizing bacteria can stimulate plant growth under both standard and unfavorable conditions via different pathways [44,45]. PGPR can also be categorized as an extracellular growth promoter of rhizobacteria in plants. In the rhizosphere, or root cortex, there is an intercellular plant growth promoter (iPGPR) that depends on its interaction with plants [46]. In the biosynthetic processes of secondary metabolites associated with plant defense responses to pathogenic agents, PGPR act as the main catalysts for key enzymes [47]. PGPR also encourage jasmonic acid biosynthesis in plants, which act as a signal pathway transducer that lead to aggregation in the production of secondary plant metabolites. Investigators have tried many methods, including hormone-dependent tests, medium structure, and penetration of light, to improve plant tissue crops [48,49].

4.4. Parasites

Plants engage in distinct defensive processes in response to the specific kind of pathogen encountered [62]. Necrotrophic pathogens seem to start reactions that depend on jasmonic acid and ethylene, while biotrophic pathogens trigger reactions that depend on salicylic acid. The processes responsible for this differential identification and reaction may include crosstalk between jasmonic acid, ethylene, and salicylic acid signal transduction pathways [63]. When a parasite is detected in a plant, its immune system responds by inducing a complex array of defensive responses by interacting with elicitor molecules [64]. Host-specific resistance and non-host-specific resistance are the two categories used to classify resistance in plant species. Interactions between certain genotypes of the host and the pathogen are necessary for host-specific resistance to develop, which then results in pathogen race-specific resistance [65].

4.5. Virus

Viruses are parasites that need an organism’s host body to replicate. The interaction between the host and the virus leads to the development of several tactics to boost the plant’s defensive system [66]. The factors that contribute to plant illnesses, such as the environment, plant host, and pathogen, may all be influenced by biocontrol agents. Several countries worldwide have produced and registered numerous bio-control medications with effective phytopathogen inhibitory activity to reduce plant damage and promote plant growth and development. The use of biocontrol agents includes the natural or purposeful exploitation of living creatures (microorganisms) that interact with phytopathogens [67].
These interactions have the potential to change the conditions of the soil and significantly impact the health of the plants in numerous ways. Plants have undergone evolutionary processes in response to their specific environmental circumstances, and they engage in ongoing interactions with other microorganisms. Hypersensitive response induction in plants is related to the proliferation of necrotic or chlorotic lesions and aberrant development, which seems to increase ethylene biosynthesis. The interaction between viruses and hosts influences the production and level of auxin in plants. In addition, viral infections alter the endogenous levels of cytokinins (CK) in plants [68,69].

4.6. Bacteria

Bacterial elicitation is the process of inducing a physiological or biochemical response in plants by using bacteria and their biological components (Table 3). Since bacteria already exist in the soil, plants confront enormous obstacles in the environment, which encourages the creation of secondary metabolites as a defensive strategy. Similar to this, live bacteria cultures may be able to stimulate the production of secondary metabolites in the absence of oxygen [70,71]. Comparatively, bacterial elicitors have a shorter growing time and fewer preparatory procedures than other biotic elicitors [72].

4.7. Fungal Elicitation

Fungal association with the plant root, such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), helps the plant contain nitrogen, sulfur, phosphorus, and micronutrients required for growth and development. This symbiosis improves plant water uptake while preventing harmful fungi, microorganisms, and nematode parasites from entering the plant via the roots [81].
Fungal elicitors (free-living and endophytic) are the most significant and often employed biotic elicitors for the synthesis of industrial compounds (Table 4). Because of the hypersensitive reactions brought on by the interaction between fungi and plants, phytoalexins are increased, and secondary metabolite production is more efficiently stimulated [82]. Pure fungal cultures are frequently made using the hyphal tip culture. Water-soluble extracts of Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, Penicillium notatum, and Fusarium oxysporum, among others, were utilized to stimulate the formation of anthocyanins in D. carota L. In contrast to P. notatum and F. oxysporum treatments, mycelial extracts of A. flavus provided the greatest elicitation through a double rise in anthocyanin synthesis [83]. In a different experiment, A. niger increased the production of thiophene in T. patula L. by 85% in comparison to a control [84]. In comparison to earlier non-biological elicitation techniques, the use of A. niger as an elicitor enhanced menthol production in Mentha piperita L. cell cultures to a level of 140.8 mg/L [85].
A. niger produced nine times more gymnemic acid in G. sylvestre (Retz.) schult cultures than it did in those cultures [86]. A. niger and Rhizopus stolonifera produced 4.9 and 3.8 times more glycyrrhizin in Abrus precatorius L. cultures, respectively [87]. Commercial value can be found in the dye-producing plant Oldenlandia umbellate L. Elicitors such as A. niger, Mucor prayagensis, and Trichoderma viride, among others, were used to accelerate its growth. With 79 shoots and 47 roots, A. niger-treated cultures showed the greatest response [88].
P. quinquefolius L. suspension cells were employed to extract ginsenoside from Trichoderma atroviride and T. harzianum culture filtrates. T. atroviride produced ginsenoside (3.2 times more than the control) after a 5-day treatment. It was used to produce the simultaneous metabolite ginsenoside and anthocyanin in suspension-cultured cells of P. sikkimensis [89]. T. harzianum filtrate raised asiaticoside production on Centella asiatica L. cultures by 2.53 times. Colletotrichum lindemuthianum decreased asiaticoside production but increased biomass, and F. oxysporum inhibited shoot growth and produced poor asiaticoside yield [90].
After being treated with the cultures of H. perforatum L., the extracts of F. oxysporum, and Botrytis cinerea caused a decline in biomass and an immediate rise in phenylpropanoid and naptho-dianthrones. Hypericin and pseudo-hypericin levels peaked early in the growth stage and then steadily declined. In contrast to the control, where only trace amounts of ajmalicine and 5.8 g/L catharanthine were found, Micromucoris abellina filtrates from cultures rapidly increased indole alkaloid biosynthesis in Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don. As a result, 400 g/L ajmalicine and 600 g/L catharanthine were produced [91].
To treat Corylus avellane L. cell suspension cultures, endophytic fungi like Chaetomium globosum and Paraconiothyrium brasiliense were obtained from Taxus baccata L. and Corylus avellane L., respectively. The highest level of elicitation was observed at 10% (v/v) of C. globosum, with a 4.1-fold increase in paclitaxel production on day 17 [92]. Table 4 lists the most frequent fungal stimuli for the production of secondary compounds.
Table 4. Fungi elicitors used in the production of secondary metabolites with biological activities.
Table 4. Fungi elicitors used in the production of secondary metabolites with biological activities.
Fungi ElicitorPlant SpeciesSecondary MetabolitesBiological ActivityReferences
Phytophthora megaspermaSoyabeans and capsicum annumGlyceollinAntiestrogen effect in breast cancers, anti-vasculogenesis, anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor, anti-septic, and osteoinductive activityAkutagawa et al., 2019; Chamkhi et al., 2021 [93,94]
Alternaria carthamiCatharanthus
Tinctorius L.
PolyacetylenesAntiproliferative, anti-inflammatory, antifungal antimicrobial, insecticidal, and repellent activity
Alternaria tenuisCatharanthus roseus (L.) G. DonDiosgeninAnti-diabetic, apoptotic, necrotic, and anti-proliferative, anti-Alzheimer, genotoxic, mutagenic, autoimmune encephalitis activity, and cardiovascular disordersBanchio et al., 2008; Iman et al., 2016
[54,95]
Fungal myceliaPanax Ginseng C.A.Anti-tumor and immunomodulating activityRokem et al., 1984 [96]
Rhizopus arrhizusMorinda citrifolia L.Akutagawa et al., 2019 [93]
Aspergillus flavusZea mays L.AnthocyaninAntioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anticancer and anti-allergic activityBahadur et al., 2007 [56]
Penicillium chrysogenumArabidopsis thalianaArtemisininAnti-angiogenic, anti-tumoral, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, osteoprotective, antiviral, antimalarial, antiparasitic, and antifungal activityBahadur et al., 2007; Banchio et al., 2008
[54,56]
Phytophthora parasiticaNicotiana tabacumCoumarinAntioxidant, antibacterial, antiproliferative, aminudin α-glucosidase inhibitory activityAkutagawa et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2003
[93,97]
Protomyces gravidusAmbrosia artemisiifoliaThiarubrine AAntibiotic, antiviral, and anti-HIV activityChen et al., 2003 [97]
Rhizoctonia solaniAbrus precatorius L.SesquiterpenesAnti-Alzheimer, anti-influenza A (H1N1),
Cytotoxic, allelopathic, and antibacterial activity
Banchio et al., 2008 [54]
Pythium aphanidermatumNicotiana Tabaccum, Lycopersicon esculentump-Hydroxy
benzoic acid, rosmarinic acid
Anti-inflammatory, antifibrotic, anti-diabetic, antioxidant, anticancer, genotoxic, antimicrobial, hepatoprotective, allelochemical, immunotherapeutic, antifeedant, antibacterial, antifungal, molluscicide activity, and anti-convulsant activityBahadur et al., 2007; Banchio et al., 2008; Iman et al., 2016
[54,56,95]
Aspergillus nigerAbrus precatorius L., Gymnema sylvestre, Taxuschinensis
Rhizoctonia solaniPhaseolus vulgaris L.SesquiterpenesAnti-Alzheimer, anti-influenza A (H1N1), Cytotoxic, allelopathic, and antibacterial activityBanchio et al., 2008 [54]
Verticillium alboatrumWithania somniferaPhytoalexinsAntimicrobial and anticancer activityChamkhi et al., 2021 [94]

4.8. Plant Growth Regulators

Hormones (chemical messengers) influence the capacity of the plant to react based on environmental conditions. Specific target tissues are identified with plant hormones and respond physiologically. On the other hand, some plant hormones (Figure 4) act as elicitors to influence the genetic expression of multiple photosynthetic pathway genes. Salicylic acid and jasmonic acid and their derivatives are essential in gene expression for signals. While abscisic acid is a stress hormone, it prompts a quick reaction to stress [46].
By regulating phytohormones in strawberry cell suspensions, researchers tried to increase anthocyanin aggregation in Fragaria ananassa, Daucus carota, Oxalis reclinate, and Ipomoea batatas. The impact of several growth-regulating agents is investigated on the biomass aggregation and anthocyanin content of batch crops of Daucus carota grown in liquid and solid states. At various levels where growth and production of the pigments were encouraged, growth regulators like 2,4-D and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) were complimentary. Therefore, when treated with methyl jasmonic acid (MeJA), the most substantial improvement was achieved in anthocyanin biosynthesis [98].
Calcium is a pervasive molecule active in the plant’s signal transduction in different pathways. It has been demonstrated that the calcium ion inflow enhances the plant’s stress-related reaction to light, salt, drought, and cold temperatures. Treatment of low-calcium Daucus carota cultures increased both the growth of the plant and the production of anthocyanin. It was recently demonstrated that exogenous calcium addition stimulates somatic embryogenesis in vitro in Coffea canephora culture. By stimulating endogenous production of IAA in the roots of etiolated seedlings of Brassica juncea, exogenously administered melatonin, and increasing root development [4]. Figure 5 shows various influences on the different aspects of plants.

4.8.1. Ethylene

The phytohormone ethylene has a significant impact on the entire plant life cycle, but it is especially important for the development of resistance to abiotic stress. Functional genomics has gradually characterized the action mechanism of ethylene in the growth of medicinal plant parts and fiber elongation [99]. It is an essential factor in the response of plants to microbial pathogens, including herbivorous insects, as well as in plant interactions with beneficial microorganisms and insects, as shown in Table 5 [100]. Ethylene also affects a variety of plant processes, including maturation and the process of aging [101,102].

4.8.2. Auxin

The hormone auxin appears to be essential for the survival of plants and is commonly found as IAA. It performs a crucial role in controlling cell development and mitosis. On a large morphological scale, auxin influences apical dominance and root dominance, as well as other processes such as elongation and lateral root development [128,129]. The IAA also affects fluorescence, photosynthetic activity, and the formation of pigments, the biosynthesis of different metabolites (Table 5), and the plant’s ability to handle stress. Auxin also helps oilseed crops develop and grow seeds, which increases the amount of oil extracted from seeds [130].
Auxins are very important for keeping leaves and fruits from falling apart as they grow. In contrast, a reduction in auxin causes the petiole branch to split and the fruit stem to droop, resulting in the leaves and fruit falling to the ground. Also, using ROS together with auxin may give plants a way to improve their performance when they are under stress [131]. Research shows that Melissa officinalis grows better when IAA is used, having more branches, nodes, calluses, longer stems, new roots, and stems [114].

4.8.3. Cytokinins

Stronger cytokinins exist, such as synthetic phenyl urea derivatives Thidiazuron hormone (TDZ) and forchlorfenuron (CPPU) activity, which are crucial for plant growth. As opposed to adenine-form cytokinins like kinetin KIN and BAA, they promote adventitious bud development [132]. TDZ has proven to be an effective stimulant for in vitro shoot regeneration in some plant species. Utilizing plant cell culture techniques, important secondary metabolites have been produced in great quantities from a variety of medicinal plants, adding to our vast understanding of the synthesis and utilization of secondary metabolites from plants (Table 5) [133].

4.8.4. Abscisic Acid

Abscisic acid (ABA) is a phytohormone that accumulates in response to many environmental and biological events, functioning as a stress hormone. It is an essential phytohormone that controls the expansion, maturation, and tolerance of plants to stress. It also regulates physiological processes in plants, such as the closing of stomata, the buildup of cuticular wax, the aging of leaves, the dormancy of buds, the germination of seeds, and the regulation of osmosis [128].
Plants quickly build up ABA, which then triggers several stress responses in response to things like drought and salt (Table 5). The activation of many LEA-class genes, including EM6, RD29B, EM1, RAB18, AIL1, and other well-established ABA-responsive indicator genes, is considered to protect plants against the detrimental effects of dehydration [134,135]. Through regulation of gene expression, ABA plays a key role in speeding up leaf senescence. Two marker genes up-regulated during senescence, ASSOCIATED GENE12 (SAG12), ORESARA1 (ORE1), and SENESCENCE, are transcriptionally stimulated by ABA [136,137].

4.8.5. Gibberellic Acid

Gibberellic acid (GA) is a well-known diterpene phytohormone that develops secondary metabolites as an important elicitor, as listed in Table 6 [106]. Geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGPP), a natural precursor of the diterpenoid C20, is present in them, and regulates many biosynthetic processes of development and production, notably germination of seeds, stem lengthening, flowering, development of fruits, and transcription of the cereal substratum aleurone. It is produced not only by higher plants but also by bacteria and fungi [138].
The GA of fungal and bacterial origin serves as a signaling factor to determine the interplay with the host plants. Also, functional cDNA expression library screening or molecular genetic methods using dwarf mutants deficient in GA biosynthesis have established enzymes for coding genes [139]. The critical growth regulators are consistent with GA’s role as hormonal and environmental signals. These are examined by GA biosynthesis and deactivation pathways [140].

4.8.6. Brassinosteroids

A group of vital agricultural hormones known as brassinosteroids (BS) have a variety of roles in the complex growth and development of plants. They first evolved from Brassica napus pollen and are distinguished by their polyhydroxylated sterol structure. According to studies, they have been demonstrated to control a wide range of physiological processes, including seed germination, elongation of cells, division of cells, senility, vascular differentiation, growth, root development, photomorphogenesis, etc. [141].
About 70 brassinosteroids have been isolated, along with 24 metabolites and many conjugates. Epimerization, dehydrogenation, demethylation, acylation, esterification, hydroxylation, glycosylation, side-chain cleavage, and sulphonation are a few metabolic and catabolic processes that are involved in preserving the optimal levels of bioactive BS in the cell or tissue, as listed in Table 6. There are two categories of brassinosteroid metabolism, depending on the change in steroid conformation and side chains. They exhibit regulatory stress and growth-enhancing behavior. Elucidation of the biochemical and molecular impact of secondary metabolites and brassinosteroids has projected them as extremely promising and environmentally safe natural compounds ideal for wide use in plant defense and enhanced crop yield. Recent studies have also shown that BR biosynthesis can be regulated by external stimuli like salt, temperature, and stress [142].
Table 6. Role of gibberellic acid and brassinosteroids in the production of secondary metabolites in plants.
Table 6. Role of gibberellic acid and brassinosteroids in the production of secondary metabolites in plants.
Plant SpeciesCompoundsReferences
Gibberellic acid
Salvia miltiorrhizaTanshinonesYuan et al., 2018 [143]
Echinacea pupureaCaffeic acid derivativesAbbasi, 2012 [144]
Caftaric and cichoric acidJones et al., 2009 [145]
Artemisia annuaArtemisininBanyai et al., 2011 [146]
Brassinosteroids
Aegle marmelos24-EpibrassinolideSondhi et al., 2008 [147]
Brassica napusNolan et al., 2020 [148]
Helianthus annuusFilová et al., 2013 [149]
Pisum sativumFedina et al., 2017 [150]
Raphanus sativusChaudhary et al., 2012 [151]
Arabidopsis thalianaGSK-3/Shaggy, BKI1Rozhon et al., 2014 [152]
Brassica campestris24-Epibrassinolide, brassinolideFerrie et al., 2005 [153]
Solanum lycopersicum28-Homobrassinolide, 24-epibrassinolideHayat et al., 2012 [154]
Cupressus arizonicaTeasterone, 28-homocastasterone, 3-dehydroteasterone, brassinolide, and dolichosteroneGriffiths et al., 1995 [155]
Equisetum arvenseBrassinolide, 24-epibrassinolide, and 28- homobrassinolideVardhini et al., 2006 [156]
Thea sinensisBrassinolide, castasterone, 28-norbrassinolide, brassinone, 24-ethylbrassinone, and dolichosteroneIkekawa et al., 1984 [157]
Citrus sinensisCastasteroneMotegi et al., 1994 [158]
Zea mays28-Norbrassinolide, 28-norcastasterone, 28-homocastasterone, and 28-homodolichosteroneTumova et al., 2018 [159]
Lilium elegansBrassinolide, castasterone, typhasterol, and teasteroneSuzuki et al., 1994 [160]

4.8.7. Jasmonic Acid (JA)

Higher-growing plants contain jasmonic acid (JA; 3-oxo-2-20 -cis-pentenyl-cyclopentane-1-acetic acid), a natural growth-regulating compound. The jasmonate group of cyclopentanone chemicals, which includes JA and MeJA, modulates a variety of plant reactions and serves as an efficient elicitor to increase in vitro generation of secondary compounds, as listed in Table 7 [161]. It is commonly produced in selective plants as a stress hormone. It has an essential role in many cellular processes, such as signaling in plant defense systems for gene expression and regulating protein production by the octadecanoid pathway, which causes systemic metabolic changes to control resistance against pathogenic JA [162]. Stomatal opening, Rubisco biosynthesis inhibition, nitrogen and phosphorus uptake, and the transport of organic materials like glucose can all be affected by it [163].
Many signal transduction routes, including short-distance, long-distance, airborne, and vascular bundle transmission, are well-recognized concerning the production and transmission of JA. Plants’ metabolic pathways trigger secondary substance formation in response to stressors from the environment [164]. According to Chung et al. (2016), JA elicitation enhances the levels of phenolic molecules, or antioxidants, in basil and lettuce leaves. Origanum majorana L. has a significant increase in carotenoids in response to JA elicitation. The O. majorana L. plant’s antioxidant profile can increase the elicitation of yeast extracts, which guarantees a high concentration of ascorbic acid and chlorophyll [165].
Table 7. Role of Jasmonic acid in the production of secondary metabolites in plants.
Table 7. Role of Jasmonic acid in the production of secondary metabolites in plants.
Plant SpeciesCompoundsReferences
Celastrus paniculatusPhenolicsAnusha et al., 2016 [166]
Glycyrrhiza glabraSoyasaponinHayashi et al., 2003 [167]
Hypericum perforatumPhenyl propanoidsGadzovska et al., 2007 [168]
Mentha piperitaRosmarinic acidKrzyzanowska et al., 2012; Almagro et al., 2014 [162,169]
Psoralea corylifolia L.PsoralenSiva et al., 2015 [170]
Vitis rotundifoliaStilbeneNopo-olazabal et al., 2014 [171]
Vitis viniferaAnthocyanin, stilbene, trans-resveratrolCurtin et al., 2003; Xu et al., 2015 [172,173]
Plumbago indicaPlumbaginGangopadhyay, 2011 [174]
Plumbago roseaSilja, 2014 [175]

4.8.8. Methyl Jasmonate

Methyl Jasmonate (MeJA) was first isolated from the essential oil of Jasminum grandiflora in 1962. The important signaling compounds suggested for the mechanism of elicitation, contribute to the hyperproduction of various secondary metabolites, e.g., JA, methyl ester, and MeJA [176]. It plays a vital role and demonstrates efficacy in improving secondary metabolite development in cell cultures, as listed in Table 8.

4.8.9. Salicylic Acid (SA)

It induces several pathogens for systemic resistance, signals for defensive gene expression-regulating pathogens, and manages the tolerance of fungal, bacterial, and viral infections. The octadecanoid pathway, which is activated by JA, generates a variety of proteins (Table 9) that give plants immunity to insects. The triterpenoids, ginsenosides in ginseng, and glycyrrhizin in licorice are also caused to accumulate. According to recent research, SA at the right concentrations can also encourage the formation of monoterpenes [209,210,211,212]. Plants produce resistance to pathogenic bacteria when SA and JA are administered externally [213].

5. Conclusions

Numerous stressors, including the growth and production of secondary metabolites, have an impact on plants. The main benefit of elicitation is synthesizing bioactive metabolites with independence from the environment and soil conditions. Significant progress has been made in using elicitation techniques to manufacture chemicals and pharmaceuticals. Genetic alterations are used to control the formation of secondary metabolites that can improve the plant’s potential by enhancing its natural defense mechanisms and can be influenced by both biotic and abiotic influences. The molecular understanding of the stress response can aid in the improvement of in-plant processes with enhanced adaptability and efficiency. Though elicitation increases secondary metabolism in plants or plant cells, the specific process of elicitation is unknown. Experts in plant science, pharmacognosy, microbiology, phytochemistry, biochemistry, molecular biology, and fermentation technology can work together to maximize the capacity of plant cells. This opens up the possibility of doing extensive research to use plant cells for the production of secondary metabolites for various applications. It can also help in developing eco-friendly agricultural practices and the production of healthier crops.

Author Contributions

D.J.: original draft preparation; S.B. and A.P.: assisted in collecting parts of the data and references; A.P.: design the tables; D.J. and K.S.: revised and reviewed the manuscript; P.B. and G.K.: conceived the idea of manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Samtiya, M.; Aluko, R.E.; Dhewa, T.; Moreno-Rojas, J.M. Potential Health Benefits of Plant Food-Derived Bioactive Components: An Overview. Foods 2021, 10, 839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Varshney, N.; Jain, D.; Janmeda, P.; Mitra, D. Role of Medicinal plants in Pharmaceutical Sector: An Overview. Glob. J. Biosci. Biotechnol. 2021, 10, 18–24. [Google Scholar]
  3. Jain, D.; Janmeda, P. Pharmacognostic standardization and qualitative analysis of Gymnosporia senegalensis. J. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2022, 3, 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ramakrishna, A.; Ravishankar, G.A. Influence of abiotic stress signals on secondary metabolites in plants. Plant Signal Behav. 2011, 6, 1720–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dixon, R.A. Natural products and plant disease resistance. Nature 2001, 411, 843–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Oksman-Caldentey, K.M.; Inzé, D. Plant cell factories in the post-genomic era: New ways to produce designer secondary metabolites. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Naik, P.M.; Al-Khayri, J.M. Abiotic and biotic elicitors-role in secondary metabolites production through in vitro culture of medicinal plants. In Abiotic and Biotic Stress in Plants-Recent Advances and Future Perspectives; In Tech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2016; pp. 247–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cox, P.A.; Balick, M.J. The Ethnobotanical Approach to Drug Discovery. Sci. Am. 1994, 270, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mustafa, N.R.; Kim, H.K.; Choi, Y.H.; Verpoorte, R. Metabolic changes of salicylic acid-elicited Catharanthus roseus cell suspension cultures monitored by NMR-based metabolomics. Biotechnol. Lett. 2009, 31, 1967–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kawauchi, M.; Toshi-Hide, A.; Masanori, K. Molecular cloning and transcriptional analysis of WRKY and solavetivone biosynthetic genes in the hairy roots of Hyoscyamus albus. Plant Gene 2016, 5, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kaur, B.; Sandhu, K.S.; Kamal, R.; Kaur, K.; Singh, J.; Röder, M.S.; Muqaddasi, Q.H. Omics for the Improvement of Abiotic, Biotic, and Agronomic Traits in Major Cereal Crops: Applications, Challenges, and Prospects. Plants 2021, 23, 1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dörnenburg, H.; Knorr, D. Strategies for the improvement of secondary metabolite production in plant cell cultures. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 1995, 17, 674–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Namdeo, A.G. Plant cell elicitation for production of secondary metabolites: A review. Pharmacog. Rev. 2007, 1, 69–79. [Google Scholar]
  14. Montesano, M.; Brader, G.; Palva, E.T. Pathogen derived elicitors: Searching for receptors in plants. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2003, 4, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Garcia-Brugger, A.; Lamotte, O.; Vandelle, E.; Bourque, S.; Lecourieux, D.; Poinssot, B.; Wendehenne, D.; Pugin, A. Early signaling events induced by elicitors of plant defenses. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2006, 19, 711–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ferrari, S. Biological elicitors of plant secondary metabolites: Mode of action and use in the production of nutraceutics. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2010, 698, 152–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Namdeo, A.G. Investigation on Pilot Scale Bioreactor with Reference to the Synthesis of Bioactive Compounds from Cell Suspension Cultures of Catharanthus roseus Linn. Ph.D. Thesis, Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya, Indore, India, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jain, D.; Chaudhary, P.; Tripathi, R.; Janmeda, P. The impact of various environmental factors on secondary metabolites in plants. In The Life of Plants in a Changing Environment; Cambridge Scholars Publishing: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2021; pp. 1–33. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gómez-Vásquez, R.; Day, R.; Buschmann, H.; Randles, S.; Beeching, J.R.; Cooper, R.M. Phenylpropanoids, phenylalanine ammonia lyase and peroxidases in elicitor-challenged cassava (Manihot esculenta) suspension cells and leaves. Ann. Bot. 2004, 94, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Jamiołkowska, A. Natural Compounds as Elicitors of Plant Resistance against Diseases and New Biocontrol Strategies. Agronomy 2020, 10, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cai, Z.; Kastell, A.; Speiser, C.; Smetanska, I. Enhanced resveratrol production in Vitis vinifera cell suspension cultures by heavy metals without loss of cell viability. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2013, 171, 330–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Patel, H.; Krishnamurthy, R. Elicitors in plant tissue culture. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2013, 2, 60–65. [Google Scholar]
  23. Threlfall, D.R.; Whitehead, I.M. The use of biotic and abiotic elicitors to induce the formation of secondary plant products in cell suspension cultures of Solanaceous plants. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1988, 16, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Alami, I.; Mari, S.; Clérivet, A. A glycoprotein from Ceratocystis fimbriata f. sp.platani triggers phytoalexin synthesis in Platanus × acerifolia cell-suspension cultures. Phytochemistry 1998, 48, 771–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Färber, K.; Schumann, B.; Miersch, O.; Roos, W. Selective desensitization of jasmonate- and pH-dependent signaling in the induction of benzophenanthridine biosynthesis in cells of Eschscholzia californica. Phytochemistry 2003, 62, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sharp, J.K.; McNeil, M.; Albersheim, P. The primary structures of one elicitoractive and seven elicitor-inactive hexa (beta-D-glucopyranosyl)-D-glucitols isolated from the mycelial walls of Phytophthora megasperma f. sp. glycinea. J. Biol. Chem. 1984, 259, 11321–11336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fukui, H.; Yoshikawa, N.; Tabata, M. Induction of shikonin formation by agar in Lithospermum erythrorhizon cell suspension cultures. Phytochemistry 1983, 22, 2451–2453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hu, X.; Neill, S.; Cai, W.; Tang, Z. Hydrogen peroxide and jasmonic acid mediate oligo- galacturonic acid induced saponin accumulation in suspension–cultured cells of Panax ginseng. Physiol. Plant. 2003, 118, 414–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Komaraiah, P.; Ramakrishna, S.V.; Reddanna, P.; Kavi Kishor, P.B. Enhanced production of plumbagin in immobilized cells of Plumbago rosea by elicitation and in situ adsorption. J. Biotechnol. 2003, 101, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Orlita, A.; Sidwa-Gorycka, M.; Paszkiewicz, M.; Malinski, E.; Kumirska, J.; Siedlecka, E.M.; Łojkowska, E.; Stepnowski, P. Application of chitin and chitosan as elicitors of coumarins and fluoroquinolone alkaloids in Ruta graveolens L. (common rue). Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2008, 51, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Taurino, M.; Ingrosso, I.; D’amico, L.; De Domenico, S.; Nicoletti, I.; Corradini, D.; Santino, A.; Giovinazzo, G. Jasmonates elicit different sets of stilbenes in Vitis vinifera cv. Negramaro cell cultures. Springer Plus 2015, 4, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Omer, Y.; Bengi, E. Effects of sucrose and polyethylene glycol on hypericins content in Hypericum adenotrichum. Eurasia J. Biosci. 2013, 7, 101–110. [Google Scholar]
  33. Brodelius, P.; Funk, C.; Häner, A.; Villegas, M. A procedure for the determination of optimal chitosan concentrations for elicitation of cultured plant cells. Phytochemistry 1989, 28, 2651–2654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Radman, R.; Saez, T.; Bucke, C.; Keshavarz, T. Elicitation of plants and microbial cell systems. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2003, 37, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sathiyabama, M.; Bernstein, N.; Anusuya, S. Chitosan elicitation for increased curcumin production and stimulation of defence response in turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 89, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gorelick, J.; Rosenberg, R.; Smotrich, A.; Hanuš, L.; Bernstein, N. Hypoglycemic activity of withanolides and elicited Withania somnifera. Phytochemistry 2015, 116, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Naik, P.M.; Manohar, S.H.; Praveen, N.; Murthy, H.N. Effects of sucrose and pH levels on in vitro shoot regeneration from leaf explants of Bacopa monnieri and accumulation of bacoside A in regenerated shoots. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2010, 100, 235–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Macedo, M.L.R.; Oliveira, C.F.R.; Oliveira, C.T. Insecticidal Activity of Plant Lectins and Potential Application in Crop Protection. Molecules 2015, 20, 2014–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Huet, J.C.; Nespoulous, C.; Pernollet, J.C. Structures of elicitin isoforms secreted by Phytophthora drechsleri. Phytochemistry 1992, 31, 1471–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zimmermann, S.; Frachisse, J.M.; Thomine, S.; Barbier-Brygoo, H.; Guern, J. Elicitor-induced chloride efflux and anion channels in tobacco cell suspensions. Int. J. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 1998, 36, 665–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, K.; Dong, X.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Zhai, Y.; Li, X.; Wei, L.; Jing, M.; Dou, D. Type 2 Nep1-Like Proteins from the Biocontrol Oomycete Pythium oligandrum Suppress Phytophthora capsici Infection in Solanaceous Plants. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shibuya, N.; Minami, E. Oligosaccharide signaling for defence responses in plant. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2001, 59, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ebel, J.; Grisebach, H.; Bonhoff, A.; Grab, D.; Hoffmann, C.; Kochs, G.; Mieth, H.; Schmidt, W.; Stäb, M. Phytoalexin synthesis in soybean following infection of roots with Phytophthora megasperma or treatment of cell cultures with fungal elicitor. In Recognition in Microbe-Plant Symbiotic and Pathogenic Interactions; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1986; Volume 4, pp. 345–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bhattacharyya, P.N.; Jha, D.K. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Emergence in agriculture. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 28, 1327–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mitra, D.; Andelkovic, S.; Panneerselvam, P.; Manisha; Senapati, A.; Vasić, T.; Ganeshamurthy, A.N.; Devvret, V.; Poonam; Radha, T.K.; et al. Plant growth promoting microorganisms (PGPMs) helping in sustainable agriculture: Current perspective. Int. J. Agric. Sci. Vet. Med. 2019, 7, 50–74. [Google Scholar]
  46. Martínez-Viveros, O.; Jorquera, M.A.; Crowley, D.E.; Gajardo, G.; Mora, M.L. Mechanisms and practical considerations involved in plant growth promotion by rhizobacteria. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2010, 10, 293–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kousar, B.; Bano, A.; Khan, N. PGPR Modulation of Secondary Metabolites in Tomato Infested with Spodoptera litura. Agronomy 2020, 10, 778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, C.; Bélanger, R.R.; Benhamou, N.; Paulitz, T.C. Defense enzymes induced in cucumber roots by treatment with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Pythioum aphanidermatum. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2000, 56, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mitra, D.; Mondal, R.; Jain, D.; Vasić, T.; Sharma, K.; Khoshru, B.; Panneerselvam, P.; Ganeshamurthy, A.N.; Mon, M.E.; Mahakur, B.; et al. Influence of arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on plant growth promotion and nutrient managnment. In Research Advancements and Beneficial Effects of Plant Growth Promoting Microorganism in Agriculture; Lambert Academic Publishing: Saarbrucken, Germany, 2019; pp. 41–57. [Google Scholar]
  50. Jaleel, C.A.; Gopi, R.; Gomathinayagam, M.; Panneerselvam, R. Traditional and nontraditional plant growth regulators alter phytochemical constituents in Catharanthus roseus. Process Biochem. 2009, 44, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jaleel, C.A.; Manivannan, P.; Sankar, B.; Kishorekumar, A.; Gopi, R.; Somasundaram, R.; Panneerselvam, R. Pseudomonas fluorescens enhances biomass yield and ajmalicine production in Catharanthus roseus under water deficit stress. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2007, 60, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Namdeo, A.G.; Patil, S.; Fulzele, D.P. Influence of fungal elicitors on production of ajmalicine by cell cultures of Catharanthus roseus. Biotechnol. Prog. 2002, 18, 159–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ghorbanpour, M.; Hatami, M.; Khavazi, K. Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on antioxidant enzyme activities and tropane alkaloid production of Hyoscyamus niger under water deficit stress. Turk. J. Biol. 2013, 37, 350–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Banchio, E.; Bogino, P.C.; Zygadlo, J.; Giordano, W. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria improve growth and essential oil yield in Origanum majorana L. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2008, 36, 766–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Banchio, E.; Xie, X.; Zhang, H.; Paré, P.W. Soil bacteria elevate essential oil accumulation and emissions in sweet basil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 653–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bahadur, A.; Singh, U.P.; Sarma, B.K.; Singh, D.P.; Singh, K.P.; Singh, A. Foliar application of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria increases antifungal compounds in pea (Pisum sativum) against Erysiphe pisi. Mycobiology 2007, 35, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zhao, J.; Zhou, L.; Wu, J. Promotion of Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy root growth and tanshinone production by polysaccharide-protein fractions of plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Bacillus cereus. Process. Biochem. 2010, 45, 1517–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ghorbanpour, M.; Hatami, M. Biopriming of Salvia officinalis Seed with Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria Affects Invigoration and Germination Indices. J. Biol. Environ. Sci. 2014, 8, 29–36. [Google Scholar]
  59. Hemashenpagam, N.; Selvaraj, T. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus and plant growth promoting rhizo microorganisms (PGPR’s) on medicinal plant Solanum viarum seedlings. J. Environ. Biol. 2011, 32, 579–583. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Vafadar, F.; Amooaghaie, R.; Otroshy, M. Effects of plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus on plant growth, stevioside, NPK, and chlorophyll content of Stevia rebaudiana. J. Plant Interact. 2014, 9, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cappellari, L.D.R.; Santoro, M.V.; Nievas, F.; Giordano, W.; Banchio, E. Increase of secondary metabolite content in marigold by inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2013, 70, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Abdul Malik, N.A.; Kumar, I.S.; Nadarajah, K. Elicitor and Receptor Molecules: Orchestrators of Plant Defense and Immunity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Li, N.; Han, X.; Feng, D.; Yuan, D.; Huang, L.-J. Signaling Crosstalk between Salicylic Acid and Ethylene/Jasmonate in Plant Defense: Do We Understand What They Are Whispering? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Yu, Y.; Gui, Y.; Li, Z.; Jiang, C.; Guo, J.; Niu, D. Induced Systemic Resistance for Improving Plant Immunity by Beneficial Microbes. Plants 2022, 11, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Thakur, M.; Sohal, B.S. Role of elicitors in inducing resistance in plants against pathogen infection: A review. ISRN Biochem. 2013, 2013, 762412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zehra, A.; Raytekar, N.A.; Meena, M.; Swapnil, P. Current research in microbial sciences efficiency of microbial bio-agents as elicitors in plant defense mechanism under biotic stress: A review. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2021, 2, 100054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Jing, M.; Ma, H.; Li, H.; Guo, B.; Zhang, X.; Ye, W.; Wang, H.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Y. Differential regulation of defense-related proteins in soybean during compatible and incompatible interactions between Phytophthora sojae and soybean by comparative proteomic analysis. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 1263–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Alazem, M.; Lin, N.S. Roles of plant hormones in the regulation of host-virus interactions. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2015, 16, 529–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Boya, P.; Codogno, P.; Rodriguez-Muela, N. Autophagy in stem cells: Repair, remodelling and metabolic reprogramming. Development 2018, 145, dev146506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Biswas, T.; Pandey, S.S.; Maji, D.; Gupta, V.; Kalra, A.; Singh, M.; Mathur, A.; Mathur, A.K. Enhanced expression of ginsenoside biosynthetic genes and in vitro ginsenoside production in elicited Panax sikkimensis (Ban) cell suspensions. Protoplasma 2018, 255, 1147–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bhaskar, R.; Xavier, L.S.E.; Udayakumaran, G.; Kumar, D.S.; Venkatesh, R.; Nagella, P. Biotic elicitors: A boon for the in-vitro production of plant secondary metabolites. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2022, 149, 7–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Narayani, M.; Srivastava, S. Elicitation: A stimulation of stress in in vitro plant cell/tissue cultures for enhancement of secondary metabolite production. Phytochem. Rev. 2017, 16, 1227–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Vatsa, P.; Chiltz, A.; Luini, E.; Vandelle, E.; Pugin, A.; Roblin, G. Cytosolic calcium rises and related events in ergosterol-treated nicotiana cells. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2011, 49, 764–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Abdel-Monaim, M.F.; Ismail, M.E.; Morsy, K.M. Induction of systemic resistance of benzothiadiazole and humic acid in soybean plants against fusarium wilt disease. Mycobiology 2011, 39, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ning, W.; Chen, F.; Mao, B.L.Q.; Liu, Z.; Guo, Z.; He, Z. N-Acetylchito oligosaccharides elicit rice defence responses including hypersensitive response-like cell death, oxidative burst and defence gene expression. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2004, 64, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Minami, E.; Kuchitsu, K.; He, D.Y.; Kouchi, H.; Midoh, H.; Ohtsuki, Y.; Shibuya, N. Two novel genes rapidly and transiently activated in suspension-cultured rice cells by treatment with N-actylchitoheptaose, a biotic elicitor for phytoalexin production. Plant Cell Physiol. 1996, 37, 563–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sanabria, N.M.; Huang, J.C.; Dubery, I.A. Self/non-self perception in plants in innate immunity and defense. Self/Nonself 2010, 1, 40–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Vander, P.; Vårum, K.M.; Domard, A.; Eddine, N.; Moerschbacher, B.M.; Moerschbacher, B.M. Comparison of the ability of partially N-acetylated chitosans and chito oligosaccharides to elicit resistance reactions in wheat leaves. Plant Physiol. 1998, 118, 1353–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Day, R.B.; Okada, M.; Ito, Y.; Tsukada, K.; Zaghouani, H.; Shibuya, N.; Stacey, G. Binding site for chitin oligosaccharides in the soybean plasma membrane. Plant Physiol. 2001, 126, 1162–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Schuhegger, R.; Ihring, A.; Gantner, S.; Bahnweg, G.; Knappe, C.; Vogg, G.; Hutzler, P.; Schmid, M.; Van Breusegem, F.; Eberl, L.; et al. Serratia Mg, and pseudomonas Isof. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29, 909–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Bagyaraj, D.J. Mycorrhiza. In Biological Interactions with VAM Fungi; Powell, C.L., Bagyaraj, D.J., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1984; pp. 131–153. [Google Scholar]
  82. Pusztahelyi, T.; Holb, I.J.; Pócsi, I. Secondary metabolites in fungus-plant interactions. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ola, A.R.B.; Metboki, G.; Lay, C.S.; Sugi, Y.; Rozari, P.; Darmakusuma, D.; Hakim, E.H. Single Production of Kojic Acid by Aspergillus flavus and the Revision of Flufuran. Molecules 2019, 24, 4200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Rajasekaran, T.; Ravishanakar, G.A.; Reddy, B.O. Production of thiophenes from callus cultures of Tagetes patula L. and its mosquito larvicidal activity. Indian. J. Exp. Biol. 2003, 41, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  85. Chakraborty, A.; Chattopadhyay, S. Stimulation of methanol production in Mentha piperita cell culture. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Anim. 2008, 44, 518–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Devi, C.S.; Murugesh, S.; Srinivasan, V.M. Gymnemic acid production in suspension calli culture of Gymnema sylvestre. J. Appl. Sci. 2006, 6, 2263–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Karwasara, V.S.; Tomar, P.; Dixit, V.K. Influence of fungal elicitation on glycyrrhizin production in transformed cell cultures of Abrus precatorius Linn. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2011, 7, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Saranya, S.P.; Velayutham, K.C.; Preethi, B. Rapid and mass multiplication of Oldenlandia umbellata L. from the leaf explants through callus culture. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2019, 8, 3779–3783. [Google Scholar]
  89. Mitra, D.; Djebaili, R.; Pellegrini, M.; Mahakur, B.; Sarker, A.; Chaudhary, P.; Khoshru, B.; Gallo, M.D.; Kitouni, M.; Barik, D.P.; et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: Plant growth improvement and induction of resistance under stressful conditions. J. Plant Nutr. 2021, 44, 1993–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Prasad, A.; Mathur, A.; Kalra, A.; Gupta, M.M.; Lal, R.K.; Mathur, A.K. Fungal elicitor-mediated enhancement in growth and asiaticoside content of Centella asiatica L. shoot cultures. Plant Growth Regul. 2013, 69, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Herrera-Téllez, V.I.; Cruz-Olmedo, A.K.; Plasencia, J.; Gavilanes-Ruíz, M.; Arce-Cervantes, O.; Hernández-León, S.; Saucedo-García, M. The Protective Effect of Trichoderma asperellum on Tomato Plants against Fusarium oxysporum and Botrytis cinerea Diseases Involves Inhibition of reactive oxygen species Production. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Salehi, M.; Moieni, A.; Safaie, N.; Farhadi, S. Elicitors derived from endophytic fungi Chaetomium globosum and Paraconiothyrium brasiliense enhance pacilitaxel production in Corylus avellana cell suspension culture. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2019, 36, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Akutagawa, K.; Fujita, T.; Ouhara, K.; Takemura, T.; Tari, M. International immunopharmacology glycyrrhizic acid suppresses in FL Ammation and reduces the increased glucose levels induced by the combination of Porphyromonas gulae and ligature placement in diabetic model mice. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 68, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Chamkhi, I.; Benali, T.; Aanniz, T.; El, M.N.; Guaouguaou, F.E.; El, O.N.; El-Shazly, M.; Zengin, G.; Bouyahya, A. Plant-microbial interaction: The mechanism and the application of microbial elicitor induced secondary metabolites biosynthesis in medicinal plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 167, 269–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Iman, N.A.; Ahmad, F.; Taher, M. Phytochemistry letters Incrassamarin A-D: Four new 4-substituted coumarins from Calophyllum incrassatum and Their biological activities. Phytochem. Lett. 2016, 16, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Rokem, J.S.; Schwarzberg, J.; Goldberg, I. Autoclaved fungal mycelia increase diosgenin production in cell suspension cultures of Dioscorea deltoidea. Plant Cell Rep. 1984, 3, 159–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Chen, H.H.; Zhou, H.J.Z.; Fang, X. Inhibition of human cancer cell line growth and human umbilical vein endothelial cell angiogenesis by artemisinin derivatives in vitro. Pharmacol. Res. 2003, 48, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Wang, L.; Brouard, E.; Hilbert, G.; Renaud, C.; Petit, J.P.; Edwards, E.; Betts, A.; Delrot, S.; Ollat, N.; Guillaumie, S.; et al. Differential response of the accumulation of primary and secondary metabolites to leaf-to-fruit ratio and exogenous abscisic acid. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2021, 27, 527–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhang, W.; Hu, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Wei, J.; Sun, P.; Wu, L.; Zheng, H. Progress of ethylene action mechanism and its application on plant type formation in crops. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 1667–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Broekgaarden, C.; Caarls, L.; Vos, I.A.; Pieterse, C.M.J.; Van Wees, S.C.M. Ethylene: Traffic controller on hormonal crossroads to defense. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 2371–2379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Iqbal, N.; Khan, N.A.; Ferrante, A.; Trivellini, A.; Francini, A.; Khan, M.I.R. Ethylene role in plant growth, development and senescence: Interaction with other phytohormones. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 235913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Nazar, R.; Khan, M.I.; Iqbal, N.; Masood, A.; Khan, N.A. Involvement of ethylene in reversal of salt-inhibited photosynthesis by sulfur in mustard. Physiol. Plant. 2014, 152, 331–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. McSteen, P.; Zhao, Y. Plant hormones and signaling: Common themes and new developments. Dev. Cell 2008, 14, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Heredia, J.B.; Cisneros-Zevallos, L. The effect of exogenous ethylene and methyl jasmonate on pal activity, phenolic profiles and antioxidant capacity of carrots (Daucus carota) under different wounding intensities. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2009, 51, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ke, S.W.; Chen, G.H.; Chen, C.T.; Tzen, J.T.C.; Yang, C.Y. Ethylene signaling modulates contents of catechin and ability of antioxidant in Camellia sinensis. Bot. Stud. 2018, 59, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Liang, Z.; Ma, Y.; Xu, T.; Cui, B.; Liu, Y.; Guo, Z.; Yang, D. Effects of abscisic acid, gibberellin, ethylene and their interactions on production of phenolic acids in Salvia miltiorrhiza bunge hairy roots. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e72806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.H.; Zu, Y.G.; Efferth, T.; Tang, Z.H. The combined effects of ethylene and MeJA on metabolic profiling of phenolic compounds in Catharanthus roseus revealed by metabolomics analysis. Front. Physiol. 2016, 7, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ma, W.; Xu, L.; Gao, S.; Lyu, X.; Cao, X.; Yao, Y. Melatonin alters the secondary metabolite profile of grape berry skin by promoting VvMYB14-mediated ethylene biosynthesis. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Baharudin, N.F.; Osman, N.I. Plant development, stress responses, and secondary metabolism under ethylene regulation. Plant Stress 2023, 7, 100146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Villarreal-García, D.; Nair, V.; Cisneros-Zevallos, L.; Jacobo-Velázquez, D.A. Plants as biofactories: Postharvest stress-induced accumulation of phenolic compounds and glucosinolates in broccoli subjected to wounding stress and exogenous phytohormones. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 171378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Ninkuu, V.; Zhang, L.; Yan, J.; Fu, Z.; Yang, T.; Zeng, H. Biochemistry of terpenes and recent advances in plant protection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Taya, M.; Mine, K.; Kino-Oka, M.; Tone, S.; Ichi, T. Production and release of pigments by culture of transformed hairy root of red beet. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1992, 73, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Moreno, P.R.H.; van der Heijden, R.; Verpoorte, R. Effect of terpenoid precursor feeding and elicitation on formation of indole alkaloids in cell suspension cultures of Catharanthus roseus. Plant Cell Rep. 1993, 12, 702–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Çakmakç, R.; Mosber, G.; Milton, A.H.; Alatürk, F.; Ali, B. The effect of auxin and auxin-producing bacteria on the growth, essential oil yield, and composition in medicinal and aromatic plants. Curr. Microbiol. 2020, 77, 564–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Silva, S.D.; Sato, A.; Salgueiro Lage, C.L.S.; Aguiar, D.S.S.G.R.; De Almeida, A.D.; Esquibel, M.A. Essential oil composition of Melissa officinalis L. in vitro produced under the influence of growth regulators. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2005, 16, 1387–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Jamwal, K.; Bhattacharya, S.; Puri, S. Plant growth regulator mediated consequences of secondary metabolites in medicinal plants. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2018, 9, 26–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Bano, A.S.; Khattak, A.M.; Basit, A.; Alam, M.; Shah, S.T.; Ahmad, N.; Gilani, S.A.Q.; Ullah, I.; Anwar, S.; Mohamed, H.I. Callus induction, proliferation, enhanced secondary metabolites production and antioxidants activity of Salvia moorcroftiana L. as influenced by combinations of auxin, cytokinin and melatonin. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2022, 65, e22210200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Ge, L.; Yong, J.W.H.; Tan, S.N.; Yang, X.H.; Ong, E.S. Analysis of cytokinin nucleotides in coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) water using capillary zone electrophoresis-tandem mass spectrometry after solid-phase extraction. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1133, 322–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Vylíčilová, H.; Bryksová, M.; Matušková, V.; Doležal, K.; Plíhalová, L.; Strnad, M. Naturally occurring and artificial N9-cytokinin conjugates: From synthesis to biological activity and back. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Babosha, A.V.; Ryabchenko, A.S.; Avetisyan, T.V. Effect of exogenous cytokinins on dynamics of development and differentiation of infectious structures of the pathogen of wheat powdery mildew. Cell Tissue Biol. 2009, 3, 387–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Akagi, A.; Fukushima, S.; Okada, K.; Jiang, C.J.; Yoshida, R.; Nakayama, A.; Shimono, M.; Sugano, S.; Yamane, H.; Takatsuji, H. WRKY45-dependent priming of diterpenoid phytoalexin biosynthesis in rice and the role of cytokinin in triggering the reaction. Plant Mol. Biol. 2014, 86, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Ferrandino, A.; Lovisolo, C. Abiotic stress effects on grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): Focus on abscisic acid-mediated consequences on secondary metabolism and berry quality. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2014, 103, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. González-Villagra, J.; Rodrigues-Salvador, A.; Nunes-Nesi, A.; Cohen, J.D.; Reyes-Díaz, M.M. Age-related mechanism and its relationship with secondary metabolism and abscisic acid in Aristotelia chilensis Plants subjected to drought stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 124, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Lv, Z.Y.; Sun, W.J.; Jiang, R.; Chen, J.F.; Ying, X.; Zhang, L.; Chen, W.S. Phytohormones jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, gibberellins, and abscisic acid are key mediators of plant secondary metabolites. World J. Tradit. Chin. Med. 2021, 7, 307–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Thakur, M.; Bhattacharya, S.; Khosla, P.K.; Puri, S. Improving production of plant secondary metabolites through biotic and abiotic elicitation. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2019, 12, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Ibrahim, M.H.; Jaafar, H.Z. Abscisic acid induced changes in production of primary and secondary metabolites, photosynthetic capacity, antioxidant capability, antioxidant enzymes and lipoxygenase inhibitory activity of Orthosiphon stamineus Benth. Molecules 2013, 18, 7957–7976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Wang, X.M.; Yang, B.; Ren, C.G.; Wang, H.W.; Wang, J.Y.; Dai, C.C. Involvement of abscisic acid and salicylic acid in signal cascade regulating bacterial endophyte-induced volatile oil biosynthesis in plantlets of Atractylodes lancea. Physiol. Plant. 2015, 153, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Dreher, K.; Callis, J. Ubiquitin, hormones and biotic stress in plants. Ann. Bot. 2007, 99, 787–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Paciorek, T.; Friml, J. Auxin signaling. J. Cell Sci. 2006, 119, 1199–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Parray, J.A.; Jan, S.; Kamili, A.N.; Qadri, R.A.; Egamberdieva, D.; Ahmad, P. Current perspectives on plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2016, 35, 877–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Blomster, T.; Salojärvi, J.; Sipari, N.; Brosché, M.; Ahlfors, R.; Keinänen, M.; Overmyer, K.; Kangasjärvi, J. Apoplastic reactive oxygen species transiently decrease auxin signaling and cause stress-induced morphogenic response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 1866–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Ricci, A.; Bertoletti, C. Urea derivatives on the move: Cytokinin-like activity and adventitious rooting enhancement depend on chemical structure. Plant Biol. 2009, 11, 262–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Singh, V.; Chauhan, N.S.; Singh, M.; Idris, A.; Madanala, R.; Pande, V.; Mohanty, C.S. Establishment of an efficient and rapid method of multiple shoot regeneration and a comparative phenolics profile in in vitro and greenhouse-grown plants of Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) DC. Plant Signal Behav. 2014, 9, e970443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Bharath, P.P.; Shashibhushan, G.; Agepati, S.R. Abscisic Acid-Induced Stomatal Closure: An Important Component of Plant Defense against Abiotic and Biotic Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 615114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Wang, Z.; Wang, F.; Hong, Y.; Yao, J.; Ren, Z.; Shi, H.; Zhu, J.K. The flowering repressor SVP confers drought resistance in Arabidopsis by regulating abscisic acid catabolism. Mol. Plant. 2018, 11, 1184–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Gao, S.; Gao, J.; Zhu, X.; Song, Y.; Li, Z.; Ren, G.; Zhou, X.; Kuai, B. ABF2, ABF3, and ABF4 promote ABA-mediated chlorophyll degradation and leaf senescence by transcriptional activation of chlorophyll catabolic genes and senescence-associated genes in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 1272–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Zhao, Y.; Chan, Z.; Gao, J.; Xing, L.; Cao, M.; Yu, C.; Hu, Y.; You, J.; Shi, H.; Zhu, Y.; et al. ABA receptor PYL9 promotes drought resistance and leaf senescence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 1949–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Hedden, P. The Current Status of Research on Gibberellin Biosynthesis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2020, 61, 1832–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Sun, H.; Cui, H.; Zhang, J.; Kang, J.; Wang, Z.; Li, M.; Yi, F.; Yang, Q.; Long, R. Gibberellins Inhibit Flavonoid Biosynthesis and Promote Nitrogen Metabolism in Medicago truncatula. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Yamaguchi, S. Gibberellin metabolism and its regulation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 225–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Manghwar, H.; Hussain, A.; Ali, Q.; Liu, F. Brassinosteroids (BRs) role in plant development and coping with different stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Sharma, P.; Yadav, S.; Srivastava, A.; Shrivastava, N. Methyl jasmonate mediates upregulation of bacoside A production in shoot cultures of Bacopa monnieri. Biotechnol. Lett. 2013, 35, 1121–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Yuan, Y.; Huang, L.; Cui, G.H.; Mao, Y.; He, X. Effect of Gibberellins and its synthetic inhibitor on metabolism of tanshinones. Chin. J. Exp. Tradit. Med. Form. 2008, 14, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  144. Abbasi, B.H.; Stiles, A.R.; Saxena, P.K.; Liu, C.Z. Gibberellic acid increases secondary metabolite production in Echinacea purpurea hairy roots. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 168, 2057–2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Jones, A.M.P.; Saxena, P.K.; Murch, S.J. Elicitation of secondary metabolism in Echinacea purpurea L. by gibberellic acid and triazoles. Eng. Life Sci. 2009, 9, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Banyai, W.; Mii, M.; Supaibulwatana, K. Enhancement of artemisinin content and biomass in Artemisia annua by exogenous GA 3 treatment. Plant Growth Regul. 2011, 63, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Sondhi, N.; Bhardwaj, R.; Kaur, S.; Kumar, N.; Singh, B. Isolation of 24-epibrassinolide from leaves of Aegle marmelos and evaluation of its anti-genotoxicity employing Allium cepa chromosomal aberration assay. Plant Growth Regul. 2008, 54, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Nolan, T.M.; Vukašinović, N.; Liu, D.; Russinova, E.; Yin, Y. Brassinosteroids: Multidimensional regulators of plant growth, development, and stress responses. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 295–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Filová, A.; Sytar, O.; Krivosudská, E. Effects of brassinosteroid on the induction of physiological changes in Helianthus annuus L. under copper stress. Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendel. 2013, 61, 623–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Fedina, E.; Yarin, A.; Mukhitova, F.; Blufard, A.; Chechetkin, I. Brassinosteroid-induced changes of lipid composition in leaves of Pisum sativum L. during senescence. Steroids 2017, 117, 25–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Choudhary, S.P.; Oral, H.V.; Bhardwaj, R.; Yu, J.Q.; Tran, L.S. Interaction of brassinosteroids and polyamines enhances copper stress tolerance in Raphanus sativus. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 5659–5675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Rozhon, W.; Wang, W.; Berthiller, F.; Mayerhofer, J.; Chen, T.; Petutschnig, E.; Sieberer, T.; Poppenberger, B.; Jonak, C. Bikinin-like inhibitors targeting GSK3/Shaggy-like kinases: Characterisation of novel compounds and elucidation of their catabolism in planta. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Ferrie, A.M.R.; Dirpaul, J.; Krishna, P.; Krochko, K.W.A.; Keller, W.A. Effects of brassinosteroids on microspore embryogenesis in Brassica species. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2005, 41, 742–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Hayat, S.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Hasan, S.A. Foliar spray of brassinosteroid enhances yield and quality of Solanum lycopersicum under cadmium stress. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2012, 19, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Griffiths, G.P.; Sasse, J.M.; Yokota, T.; Cameron, W.D. 6-Deoxotyphasterol and 3-Dehydro-6-deoxoteasterone, Possible Precursors to Brassinosteroidsin the Pollen of Cupressus arizonica. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1995, 59, 956–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Vardhini, B.V.; Anuradha, S.; Rao, S.S.R. Brassinosteroids-New class of plant hormone with potential to improve crop productivity. Indian J. Plant Physiol. 2006, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  157. Ikekawa, N.; Takatsuto, S.; Kitsuwa, T.; Saito, H.; Morishita, T.; Abe, H. Analysis of natural brassinosteroids by gas chromatography and gas chromatography-Mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 1984, 290, 289–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Motegi, C.; Takatsuto, S.; Gamoh, K. Identification of brassinolide and castasterone in the pollen of orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck) by high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1994, 658, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Tůmová, L.; Tarkowská, D.; Řehořová, K.; Marková, H.; Kočová, M.; Rothová, O.; Čečetka, P.; Holá, D. Drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive genotypes of maize (Zea mays L.) differ in contents of endogenous brassinosteroids and their drought-induced changes. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0197870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Suzuki, H.; Fujioka, S.; Yokota, T.; Murofushi, N.; Sakurai, A. Identification of brassinolide, castasterone, typhasterol, and teasterone from the pollen of Lilium elegans. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1994, 58, 2075–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Creelman, R.A.; Mullet, J.E. Biosynthesis and action of jasmonates in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1997, 48, 355–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Almagro, L.; Gutierrez, J.; Pedreño, M.A.; Sottomayor, M. Synergistic and additive influence of cyclodextrins and methyl jasmonate on the expression of the terpenoid indole alkaloid pathway genes and metabolites in Catharanthus roseus cell cultures. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2014, 119, 543–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Gupta, A.; Hisano, H.; Hojo, Y.; Matsuura, T.; Ikeda, Y.; Mori, I.C.; Senthil-Kumar, M.S. Global profiling of phytohormone dynamics during combined drought and pathogen stress in Arabidopsis thaliana reveals ABA and JA as major regulators. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Pauwels, L.; Inzé, D.; Goossens, A. Jasmonate–inducible gene: What does it mean? Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Chung, I.; Thiruvengadam, M.; Rekha, K.; Rajakumar, G. Elicitation Enhanced the Production of Phenolic Compounds and Biological Activities in Hairy Root Cultures of Bitter melon (Momordica charantia L.). Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2016, 59, e160393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Anusha, T.S.; Joseph, M.V.; Elyas, K.K. Callus induction and elicitation of total phenolics in callus cell suspension culture of Celastrus paniculatus–wild, an endangered medicinal plant in India. Pharmacogn. J. 2016, 8, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Hayashi, H.; Huang, P.; Inoue, K. Up-regulation of soyasaponin biosynthesis by methyl jasmonate in cultured cells of Glycyrrhiza glabra. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003, 44, 404–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Gadzovska, S.; Maury, S.; Delaunay, A.; Spasenoski, M.; Joseph, C.; Hagège, D. Jasmonic acid elicitation of Hypericum perforatum L. cell suspensions and effects on the production of phenylpropanoids and naphtodianthrones. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2007, 89, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Krzyzanowska, J.; Czubacka, A.; Pecio, L.; Przybys, M.; Doroszewska, T.; Stochmal, A.; Oleszek, W. The effects of jasmonic acid and methyl jasmonate on rosmarinic acid production in Mentha × piperita cell suspension cultures. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2012, 108, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Siva, G.; Sivakumar, S.; Premkumar, G.; Senthil, K.T.; Jayabalan, N. Enhanced production of psoralen through elicitors treatment in adventitious root culture of Psoralea corylifolia (L). Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 7, 146–149. [Google Scholar]
  171. Nopo-Olazabal, C.; Condori, J.; Nopo-Olazabal, L.; Medina-Bolivar, F. Differential induction of antioxidant stilbenoids in hairy roots of Vitis rotundifolia treated with methyl jasmonate and hydrogen peroxide. Int. J. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 74, 50–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Curtin, C.; Zhang, W.; Franco, C. Manipulating anthocyanin composition in Vitis vinifera suspension cultures by elicitation with jasmonic acid and light irradiation. Biotechnol. Lett. 2003, 25, 1131–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Xu, A.; Zhan, J.C.; Huang, W.D. Effects of ultraviolet C, methyl jasmonate and salicylic acid, alone or in combination, on stilbene biosynthesis in cell suspension cultures of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015, 122, 197–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Gangopadhyay, M.; Dewanjee, S.; Bhattacharya, S. Enhanced plumbagin production in elicited Plumbago indica hairy root cultures. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2011, 111, 706–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Silja, P.K.; Gisha, G.P.; Satheeshkumar, K. Enhanced plumbagin accumulation in embryogenic cell suspension cultures of Plumbago rosea L. following elicitation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2014, 119, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Jeyasri, R.; Muthuramalingam, P.; Karthick, K.; Shin, H.; Choi, S.; Ramesh, M. Methyl jasmonate and salicylic acid as powerful elicitors for enhancing the production of secondary metabolites in medicinal plants: An updated review. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2023, 153, 447–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Ruiz-May, E.; Galaz-Avalos, R.M.; Loyola-Vargas, V.M. Differential secretion and accumulation of terpene indole alkaloids in hairy roots of Catharanthus roseus treated with methyl jasmonate. Mol. Biotechnol. 2009, 41, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Kim, O.T.; Kim, M.Y.; Hong, M.H.; Ahn, J.C.; Hwang, B. Stimulation of asiaticoside accumulation in the whole plant culture of Centella asiatica (L.) urban by elicitors. Plant Cell Rep. 2004, 23, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Corchete, P.; Bru, R. Proteome alterations monitored by DIGE analysis in Silybum marianum cell cultures elicited with methyl jasmonate and methyl B cyclodextrin. J. Proteom. 2013, 85, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Ali, M.B.; Yu, K.W.; Hahn, E.J.; Paek, K.Y. Differential responses of antioxidants enzymes, lipoxygenase activity, ascorbate content and the production of saponins in tissue cultured root of mountain Panax ginseng C.A. Mayer and Panax quinquefolium L. in bioreactor subjected to methyl jasmonate stress. Plant Sci. 2005, 169, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Saeed, S.; Ali, H.; Khan, T.; Kayani, W.; Khan, M.A. Impacts of methyl jasmonate and phenyl acetic acid on biomass accumulation and antioxidant potential in adventitious roots of Ajuga bracteosa Wall ex Benth., a high valued endangered medicinal plant. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants. 2017, 23, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Largia, M.J.V.; Pothiraj, G.; Shilpha, J.; Ramesh, M. Methyl jasmonate and salicylic acid synergism enhances bacoside A content in shoot cultures of Bacopa monnieri (L.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015, 122, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Mendoza, D.; Cuaspud, O.; Arias, J.P.; Ruiz, O.; Arias, M. Effect of salicylic acid and methyl jasmonate in the production of phenolic compounds in plant cell suspension cultures of Thevetia peruviana. Biotechnol. Rep. 2018, 19, e00273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Sellapan, P.; Rohani, E.R.; Mohd Noor, N.M. Sesquiterpene production in methyl jasmonate-induced Persicaria minor cell suspension culture. Sains Malays. 2018, 47, 3051–3059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Ajungla, L.; Patil, P.P.; Barmukh, R.B.; Nikam, T.D. Influence of biotic and abiotic on accumulation of hyoscyamine and scopolamine in root cultures of Datura metel L. Indian J. Biotechnol. 2009, 8, 317–322. [Google Scholar]
  186. Chodisetti, B.; Rao, K.; Gandi, S.; Giri, A. Gymnemic acid enhancement in the suspension cultures of Gymnema sylvestre by using the signaling molecules-Methyl jasmonate and salicylic acid. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2015, 51, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Hao, X.; Shi, M.; Cui, L.; Xu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Kai, G. Effects of methyl jasmonate and salicylic acid on tanshinone production and biosynthetic gene expression in transgenic Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2015, 62, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Ahmadi, Y.; Moghadam, K.P.; Bahramnejad, B.; Habibi, P. Methyl jasmonate and salicylic acid effects on the dopamine production in hairy cultures of Portulaca oleracea (Purslan). Bull. Environ. Pharmacol. Life Sci. 2013, 2, 89–94. [Google Scholar]
  189. Pirian, K.; Piri, K. Effect of methyl jasmonate and salicylic acid on noradrenalin accumulation in hairy roots of Portulaca oleracea (L.). Int. Res. J. Appl. Basic Sci. 2012, 3, 213–218. [Google Scholar]
  190. Izabela, G.; Halina, W. The effect of methyl jasmonate on production of antioxidant compounds in shoot cultures of Salvia officinalis L. Herba Pol. 2009, 55, 238–243. [Google Scholar]
  191. Firouzi, A.; Mohammadi, S.A.; Khosrowchahli, M.; Movafeghi, A.; Hasanloo, T. Enhancement of silymarin production in cell culture of Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn by elicitation and precursor feeding. J. Herbs Spices Med. Plants 2013, 19, 262–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Awad, V.; Kuvalekar, A.; Harsulkar, A. Microbial elicitation in root cultures of Taverniera cuneifolia (Roth) Arn. for elevated glycyrrhizic acid production. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 54, 13–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Sivanandhan, G.; Dev, G.K.; Jeyaraj, M.; Rajesh, M.; Arjunan, A.; Muthuselvam, M.; Manickavasagam, M.; Selvaraj, N.; Ganapathi, A. Increased production of withanolide A, withanone, and withaferin A in hairy root cultures of Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal elicited with methyl jasmonate and salicylic acid. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2013, 114, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Khojasteh, A.; Mirjalili, P.J.; Eibl, R.; Rosa, M. Cusido Methy-Jasmonate enhanced production of rosamarinic acid in cell cultures of Satureja khuzistanica in a bioreactor. Eng. Life Sci. 2016, 16, 740–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Pedapudi, S.; Chin, C.K.; Pedersen, H. Production and elicitation of benzalacetone and the raspberry ketone in cell suspension cultures of Rubus idaeus. Biotechnol. Prog. 2000, 16, 346–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Kuroyanagi, M.; Arakawa, T.; Mikami, Y.; Yoshida, K.; Kawahar, N.; Hayashi, T.; Ishimaru, H. Phytoalexins from hairy root culture of Hyoscyamus albus treated with methyl jasmonate. J. Nat. Prod. 1998, 61, 1516–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Thatcher, L.F.; Gao, L.L.; Singh, K.B. Jasmonate Signalling and Defence Responses in the Model Legume Medicago truncatula-A Focus on Responses to Fusarium Wilt Disease. Plants 2016, 5, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Perassolo, M.; Quevedo, C.V.; Giulietti, A.M.; Rodríguez, T.J.R. Stimulation of the proline cycle and anthraquinone accumulation in Rubia tinctorum cell suspension cultures in the presence of glutamate and two proline analogs. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2011, 106, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Cho, H.Y.; Son, S.Y.; Rhee, H.S.; Yoon, S.Y.H.; Lee-Parsons, C.W.; Park, J.M. Synergistic effects of sequential treatment with methyl jasmonate, salicylic acid and yeast extract on benzophenanthridine alkaloid accumulation and protein expression in Eschscholtzia californica suspension cultures. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 135, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Mathew, R.; Sankar, P.D. Effect of methyl jasmonate and chitosan on growth characteristics of Ocimum basilicum L., Ocimum sanctum L. and Ocimum gratissimum L. cell suspension cultures. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 4759–4766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Suan, S.K.; Bhatt, A.; Lai, K.C. Effect of sucrose and methyl jasmonate on biomass and anthocyanin production in cell suspension culture of Melastoma malabathricum (Melastomaceae). Rev. Biol. Trop. 2011, 59, 597–606. [Google Scholar]
  202. Shabani, L.; Ehsanpour, A.A.; Asghari, G.; Emami, J. Glycyrrhizin production by in vitro cultured Glycyrrhiza glabra elicited by methyl jasmonate and salicylic acid. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 56, 621–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Thaweesak, J.; Seiichi, S.; Hiroyuki, T.; Waraporn, P. Elicitation effect on production of plumbagin in in vitro culture of Drosera indica (L.). J. Med. Plant Res. 2011, 5, 4949–4953. [Google Scholar]
  204. Peng, Z.; Han, C.; Yuan, L.; Zhang, K.; Huang, H.; Ren, C. Brassinosteroid enhances jasmonate-induced anthocyanin accumulation in Arabidopsis seedlings. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2011, 53, 632–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Pérez, A.G.; Sanz, C.; Olías, R.; Olías, J.M. Effect of methyl jasmonate on in vitro strawberry ripening. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997, 45, 3733–3737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Fang, Y.; Smith, M.A.L.; Pépin, M.F. Effects of exogenous methyl jasmonate in elicited anthocyanin-producing cell cultures of ohelo (Vaccinium pahalae). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 1999, 35, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Saniewski, M.; Horbowicz, M.; Puchalski, J.; Ueda, J. Methyl jasmonate stimulates the formation and the accumulation of anthocyanin in Kalanchoe blossfeldiana. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2003, 25, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Szabo, E.; Thelen, A.; Petersen, M. Fungal elicitor preparation and methyl jasmonate enhance rosmarinic acid accumulation in suspension cultures of Coleus blumei. Plant Cell Rep. 1999, 18, 485–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Hayat, Q.; Hayat, S.; Irfan, M.; Ahmad, A. Effect of exogenous salicylic acid under changing environment: A review. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2010, 68, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Ryals, J.A.; Neuenschwander, U.H.; Willits, M.G.; Molina, A.; Steiner, H.Y.; Hunt, M.D. Systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell 1996, 8, 1809–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Farmer, E.E.; Johnson, R.R.; Ryan, C.A. Regulation of expression of proteinase inhibitor genes by methyl jasmonate and jasmonic acid. Plant Physiol. 1992, 98, 995–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Xu, Y.W.; Lv, S.S.; Zhao, D.; Chen, J.W.; Yang, W.T.; Wu, W. Effects of salicylic acid on monoterpene production and antioxidant systems in Houttuynia cordata. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 1364–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Walling, L.L. The myriad plant responses to herbivores. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2000, 19, 195–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Muller, S.S.; Kurosaki, F.; Nishi, A. Role of salicylic acid and intrercelluar Ca2+ in the induction of chitinase activity in carrot suspension culture. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 1994, 45, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Patil, J.G.; Ahire, M.L.; Nitnaware, K.M.; Panda, S.; Bhatt, V.P.; Kishor, P.B.; Nikam, T.D. In vitro propagation and production of cardiotonic glycosides in shoot cultures of Digitalis purpurea L. by elicitation and precursor feeding. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 2379–2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Avancini, G.; Abreu, I.N.; Saldaña, M.D.; Mohamed, R.S.; Mazzafera, P. Induction of pilocarpine formation in jaborandi leaves by salicylic acid and methyl jasmonate. Phytochemistry 2003, 63, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Pitta-Alvarez, S.I.; Spollansky, T.C.; Giulietti, A.M. The influence of different biotic and abiotic elicitors on the production and profile of tropane alkaloids in hairy root cultures of Brugmansia candida. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2000, 26, 252–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Bulgakov, V.P.; Tchernoded, G.K.; Mischenko, N.P.; Khodakovskaya, M.V.; Glazunov, V.P.; Radchenko, S.V.; Zvereva, E.V.; Fedoreyev, S.A.; Zhuravlev, Y.N. Effect of salicylic acid, methyl jasmonate, ethephon and cantharidin on anthraquinone production by Rubia cordifolia callus cultures transformed with the rolB and rolC genes. J. Biotechnol. 2002, 97, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Chodisetti, B.; Rao, K.; Gandi, S.; Giri, A. Improved gymnemic acid production in the suspension cultures of Gymnema sylvestre through biotic elicitation. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2013, 7, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Coste, A.; Vlase, L.; Halmagyi, A.; Deliu, C.; Coldea, G. Effects of plant growth regulators and elicitors on production of secondary metabolites in shoot cultures of Hypericum hirsutum and Hypericum maculatum. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2011, 106, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Shukla, N.; Kiridena, S. A fuzzy rough sets-based multi-agent analytics framework for dynamic supply chain configuration. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2016, 54, 6984–6996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Kitisripanya, T.; Komaikul, J.; Tawinkan, N.; Atsawinkowit, C.; Putalun, W. Dicentrine production in callus and cell suspension cultures of Stephania venosa. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2013, 8, 443–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. General mechanism of plasma membrane receptor-mediated signaling for secondary metabolite production in plants. When the elicitor molecule binds to the receptor, a signal cascade initiates the activation of key enzymes that catalyze the synthesis of secondary metabolites in the plant’s defense.
Figure 1. General mechanism of plasma membrane receptor-mediated signaling for secondary metabolite production in plants. When the elicitor molecule binds to the receptor, a signal cascade initiates the activation of key enzymes that catalyze the synthesis of secondary metabolites in the plant’s defense.
Agriculture 14 00796 g001
Figure 2. Factors influencing bioactive compounds in plant responses.
Figure 2. Factors influencing bioactive compounds in plant responses.
Agriculture 14 00796 g002
Figure 3. A schematic representation of plant micro biome interactions in the rhizosphere. PGPR are interacting with the plant in the root zone of the plant, beneficial for plant growth and productivity.
Figure 3. A schematic representation of plant micro biome interactions in the rhizosphere. PGPR are interacting with the plant in the root zone of the plant, beneficial for plant growth and productivity.
Agriculture 14 00796 g003
Figure 4. Different plant hormones as elicitors.
Figure 4. Different plant hormones as elicitors.
Agriculture 14 00796 g004
Figure 5. Hormones influence the different aspects of plants in response to environmental conditions.
Figure 5. Hormones influence the different aspects of plants in response to environmental conditions.
Agriculture 14 00796 g005
Table 1. Role of protein and carbohydrates in the production of secondary metabolites in plants.
Table 1. Role of protein and carbohydrates in the production of secondary metabolites in plants.
Plant SpeciesElicitorCompoundReferences
Protein
Nicotiana tabacumCellulosePhytoalexinsThrelfal and Whithead, 1988 [23]
Plantanus acerifoliaGlycoproteinCoumarinAlami et al., 1998 [24]
Eschscholzia californicaYeast cellBenzophenanthridineFarber et al., 2003 [25]
Carbohydrates
Glycine maxCarbohydratesPhytoaleinSharp et al., 1984 [26]
Lithospermum erythrorhizonOligogalacturonic acidNaphthoquinone hikoninFukui et al., 1983 [27]
Panax ginsengSaponinHu et al., 2003 [28]
Plumbago roseaPlumbaginKomaraiah et al., 2003 [29]
Ruta graveolensFluoroquinolone alkaloidsOrlita et al., 2008 [30]
Vitis viniferaTrans-resveratrol, viniferinsTaurino et al., 2015 [31]
Hypericum adenotrichumOligogalacturonic acid and sucroseHypericinOmer and Bengi, 2013 [32]
Nicotiana tabacumChitosanPhytoalexinsBrodelius et al., 1989 [33]
Eschscholzia californica
Curcuma longa L.IndirubinRadman et al., 2003 [34]
Lupines albusIsoflavonoids, Genistein
Polygonum tinctoriumAnthracene
Rheum palmatunCurcuminSathiyabama et al., 2016 [35]
Withania somniferaSucrose and ChitsonWithania AGorelick et al., 2015 [36]
Bacopa monnieriSucroseBacoside ANaik et al., 2010 [37]
Table 2. Role of PGPR in the production of secondary metabolites in plant.
Table 2. Role of PGPR in the production of secondary metabolites in plant.
Plant SpeciesCompoundReferences
Catharanthus roseusAjmalicine and serpentineJaleel et al., 2007, 2009; Namdeo et al., 2002 [50,51,52]
Hyoscyamus nigerScopolamine, hyoscyamineGhorbanpour et al., 2013 [53]
Ocimum basilicumα-terpineol, eugenolBanchio et al., 2008, 2009 [54,55]
Origanum majorana L.α-terpineol
Pisum sativumGallic acid, ferulic acid, cinnamicBahadur et al., 2007 [56]
Salvia miltiorrhizaTanshinoneZhao et al., 2010 [57]
Salvia officinalisCis-thujone. CamphorGhorbanpour et al., 2014 [58]
Solanum viarumOrthodihydroxy, tannins, flavonoids, Saponins, alkaloidsHemashenpagam and selvaraj, 2011 [59]
Stevia rebaudianaSteviosideVafadar et al., 2014 [60]
Targetes minutaMonoterpenes, phenolic compoundsCappellari et al., 2013 [61]
Table 3. Role of bacterial elicitor for the production of secondary metabolites in plant.
Table 3. Role of bacterial elicitor for the production of secondary metabolites in plant.
Bacterial ElicitorPlant SpeciesTypes of ElicitorsReferences
Bacillus subtilisGymncma sylvestreAcetoin, Surfactin, mycosubtilin, fengycin, iturines, 2,3-butanediol, StPep1Vatsa et al., 2011 [73]
Helminthosporium victoriaSolanum tuberosumVictorinAbdel-monaim et al., 2011 [74]
Magnaporthe griseaOryza sativa L.PemG1Ning et al., 2004 [75]
Phytophthora and PythiumNicotiana tabacumβ-Glucans and chitin oligomersAbdel-monaim et al., 2011 [74]
Phytophthora infestansGlucans and eicosapentaenoic acidNing et al., 2004; Vatsa et al., 2011 [73,75]
Phytophthora sojaeGlycoproteinMinami et al.1996 [76]
Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS374rHypericum perforatum L.PseudobactinMinami et al. 1996; Sanabria et al., 2010; Vander et al., 1998 [76,77,78]
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) DC3000Pinellia ternateCoronatineVander et al., 1998 [78]
Trichoderma harzianumTriticum aestivumC6 Zinc finger protein-like elicitor (Thc6)Day et al., 2014; Vander et al., 1998 [78,79]
Arthrobacter spp.Oryza sativa L.N, N-Dimethyl hexadecyl amineSanabria et al., 2010 [77]
Pseudomonas fluorescensHypericum perforatum L.
Sinorhizobium melilotiMedicago sativa
Burkholderia gladioliPanicum virgatumLipopolysaccharidesSchuhegger et al., 2006 [80]
Table 5. Role of ethylene, auxin, cytokine, and abscisic acid in the production of secondary metabolites in plants.
Table 5. Role of ethylene, auxin, cytokine, and abscisic acid in the production of secondary metabolites in plants.
Plant SpeciesCompoundsReference
Ethylene
Fragaria ananassaAnthocyaninMcSteen et al., 2008 [103]
Daucus carotaPhenolic compoundsHeredia et al., 2009; Ke et al., 2018; Liang et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2016 [104,105,106,107]
Camellia sinensis L.
Salvia miltiorrhiza
Catharanthus roseus
Vitis viniferaFlavonoids, Phenolic acids, Stilbenes, and FlavonolsMa et al., 2021 [108]
Rauwolfia serpentinaAlkaloidsBaharudin et al., 2023 [109]
Catharanthus roseus
Arabidopsis sp.GlucosinolateVillarreal-García et al., 2016 [110]
Pinophyta sp.TerpenoidsNinkuu et al., 2021 [111]
Auxin
Beeta vulgarisBetalainTaya et al., 1992 [112]
Catharanthus roseusIndole alkaloidsMoreno et al., 1993 [113]
Chamomile recutitaα-Bisabolol oxideÇakmakçı et al., 2020 [114]
Melissa officinalis LamNerol and GeraniolDa Silva et al. 2005 [115]
Papaver somniferumThebaineJamwal et al., 2018 [116]
Rauvolfia serpentineReserpine
Corydalis ambiguaCorydaline
Salvia moorcroftiana L.Phenolic compound, and FlavonoidBano et al., 2022 [117]
Cytokinin
Cocos nucifera1,3-DiphenylureaGE, 2006 [118]
Nicotiana tabacumCytokinin 7 and 9-glucosidesVylicilova, 2020 [119]
Triticum aestivumtrans-ZeatinBabosha et al., 2009 [120]
Oryza sativaIsopentenyladenineAkagi et al., 2014 [121]
Abscisic acid
Vitis vinifera L.PolyphenolsFerrandino et al., 2014 [122]
AnthocyaninsWang et al., 2021 [98]
Aristotelia chilensisGonzález-Villagra et al., 2018 [123]
Malus hupehensisLv et al., 2021 [124]
Artemisia annuaArtemisinin
Orthosiphon stamineus BenthPhenolics, Flavonoids and Soluble sugarsThakur et al., 2019
Ibrahim et al., 2013
[125,126]
Salvia miltiorrhiza
Atractylodes lanceaAtractylone, β-Eudesmol and Hinesol, Atractylodin, Volatile oilWang et al., 2015 [127]
Table 8. Role of methyl jasmonate in the production of secondary metabolites in plants.
Table 8. Role of methyl jasmonate in the production of secondary metabolites in plants.
Plant SpeciesCompoundsReferences
Catharanthus roseusAjmalicine, serpentine, catharanthine, ajmalineRuiz-May et al., 2009 [177]
Centella asiaticaAsiaticoside and centellosideKim et al., 2004; Gangopadhayay et al., 2011 [174,178]
Hypericum perforatumFlavonoidsWang et al., 2015 [127]
Panax ginsengGinsenosidesKim et al., 2004; Corchete and Bru, 2013 [178,179]
Ginsenosidea (Rg3)Ali et al., 2005 [180]
Ajuga bracteosaPhenols, flavonoids, PhytoecydysteroidsSaeed et al., 2017 [181]
Andrographis paniculataAndrographolideSharma, 2015 [142]
Artemesia absinthiumPhenols and flavonoidsAli et al., 2015 [180]
Bacopa monnieriBacoside ALargia et al., 2015 [182]
Thevetia perwianaPhenolic compoundsMendoza et al., 2018 [183]
Persicaria minorSesquiterpenesSellapan et al., 2018 [184]
Gymnema sylvestreGymnemic acidAjungla, 2009; Chodisetti et al., 2015 [185,186]
Salvia miltiorrhizaTanshinoneHao et al., 2015 [187]
Portulaca oleraceaDopamine, Non-adrenalineAhmadi et al., 2013, Pirian and Piri, 2012 [188,189]
Salvia officinalisDiterpenoidIzabela and Halina, 2009 [190]
Silybum marianumSilymarin, tanshinoneFirouzi et al., 2003;
Hao et al., 2015 [187,191]
Taverniera cuneifoliaGlycyrrhizic acidAwad, 2014 [192]
Vitis viniferaStilbene, trans-resveratrol, anthocyaninXu et al., 2015; Taurino, 2015 [31,173]
Withania somniferaWithanolide A,
withanone, withaferin A
Sivanandhan et al., 2013 [193]
Satureja khuzistanicaRosmarinic acidKhojasteh et al., 2016 [194]
Taxus baccataPhenolic contentGhobanpour et al., 2014 [60]
Taxus cuspidatePaclitaxelPedapudi et al., 2000 [195]
Taxus canadensis
Hyoscyamus albusPhytoalexinsKuroyanagi et al., 1998 [196]
Medicago truncatulaProtein content Thatcher et al., [197]
Rubia tinctorumAnthraquinonePerassolo et al., 2011 [198]
Eschscholtzia californicaBenzophenanthridine alkaloidCho et al., 2008 [199]
Origanum basilicumHydroxycinnamic acid derivativesMathew and Sankar, 2012 [200]
O. sanctum
O. gratissimum
Melastoma malabathricumAnthocyaninSuan et al., 2011 [201]
Glycyrrhiza glabraGlycyrrhizinShabani et al., 2009 [202]
Drosera indicaPlumaginThaweesak et al., 2011 [203]
Arabidopsis thalianaAnthocyaninPeng et al., 2011 [204]
Fragaria ananassaPerez et al., 1977 [205]
Vaccinium pahalaeFang et al., 1999 [206]
Tulipa GesnerianaSaniewski et al., 2003 [207]
Rubus idaeusRubusidaeus ketone benzal acetonePedapudi et al., 2000 [195]
Coleus blumeiRosmarinic acidSzabo et al., 1999 [208]
Table 9. Role of salicylic acid in the production of secondary metabolites in plants.
Table 9. Role of salicylic acid in the production of secondary metabolites in plants.
Plant SpeciesCompoundsReferences
Datura metelHyoscyamine
and scopolamine
Ajungla, 2009 [185]
Daucus carotaChitinaseMuller et al., 1994 [214]
Digitalis purpureaDigitoxinPatil et al., 2013 [215]
Brumansia candidaScopolamine (alkaloid)Avancini et al., 2003 [216]
Pitta-alvarez et al., 2000 [217]
Rubia cordifoliaAnthraquinoneBulgakov et al., 2002 [218]
Gymnema sylvestreGymnemic acidChodisetti et al., 2013 [219]
Hypericum hirsutumHypericin
and pseudohypericin
Coste et al., 2011 [220]
Vitis viniferaStilbene, vinblastine and vincristineXu et al., 2015 [173]
Withania somniferaWithanolide A,
withanone,
and withaferin A
Sivanandhan et al., 2013 [193]
Aloe veraPolysaccharides and phenolicsShukla and kiridena, 2016 [221]
Stephania venosaDicentrineKitisripanya et al., 2013 [222]
Pilocarpus pennatifoliuspilocarpineAvancini et al., 2003 [216]
Glycyrrhiza glabraGlycyrrhizinShabani et al., 2009 [202]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jain, D.; Bisht, S.; Parvez, A.; Singh, K.; Bhaskar, P.; Koubouris, G. Effective Biotic Elicitors for Augmentation of Secondary Metabolite Production in Medicinal Plants. Agriculture 2024, 14, 796. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14060796

AMA Style

Jain D, Bisht S, Parvez A, Singh K, Bhaskar P, Koubouris G. Effective Biotic Elicitors for Augmentation of Secondary Metabolite Production in Medicinal Plants. Agriculture. 2024; 14(6):796. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14060796

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jain, Divya, Shiwali Bisht, Anwar Parvez, Kuldeep Singh, Pranav Bhaskar, and Georgios Koubouris. 2024. "Effective Biotic Elicitors for Augmentation of Secondary Metabolite Production in Medicinal Plants" Agriculture 14, no. 6: 796. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14060796

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop