Next Article in Journal
Calibration and Testing of Discrete Elemental Simulation Parameters for Pod Pepper Seeds
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Mycorrhizal Symbiosis on the Development of the Canary Island Tomato Variety “Manzana Negra” under Abiotic Stress Conditions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Screening Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains for Their Tolerance to Increased Osmotic Pressure and Their Suitability to Ensile High Dry Matter Forages
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Isolation of Bacillus velezensis from Silage and Its Effect on Aerobic Stability and In Vitro Methane Production of Whole-Plant Corn Silage

1
The Biological Feedstuff Laboratory, College of Animal Science and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
2
Animal Nutritional Genome and Germplasm Innovation Research Center, College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
3
Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Farmland Ecological Conservation and Pollution Prevention, College of Resources and Environment, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Agriculture 2024, 14(6), 830; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14060830
Submission received: 19 March 2024 / Revised: 21 May 2024 / Accepted: 22 May 2024 / Published: 25 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Silage Preparation, Processing and Efficient Utilization)

Abstract

:
Once a silo has been opened, the silage inside will face challenges such as aerobic deterioration, rot, and contamination. Biocontrol bacteria, as a kind of biological antiseptic, are highly effective and natural and are gaining increasing attention. This study aimed to screen a strain with anti-microbial activity against silage spoilage microorganisms and examine its effects on the fermentation quality, aerobic stability, in vitro digestion, and methane production of silage. Lactic acid bacteria, pathogenic and rot-causing microorganisms, were used as indicators to screen the strains for putrefactive silage. The bacteriostatic spectrum, growth performance, and tolerance to the silage environment of the strain were tested. A strain named D-2 was screened from rotten whole-plant corn silage and identified as Bacillus velezensis through physiological and biochemical tests as well as 16S rDNA sequencing. This study found that D-2 exhibits antibacterial effects on several microorganisms, including Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella enteritidis, Aspergillus niger, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Fusarium oxysporum, and Fusarium graminearum. However, it has no adverse effect on Lactobacillus reuteri, Enterococcus faecium, or Lactobacillus casei. D-2 can attain a stable stage within 10 h and withstand temperatures of up to 70 °C. Moreover, this study found that D-2 had a high survival rate of over 97% after 48 h in a lactic acid environment with pH 4. Freshly chopped whole-plant corn was inoculated without or with D-2 and ensiled for 60 days. The results show that D-2 inoculations increase the content of water-soluble carbohydrates, acetic acid, and propionic acid in the silage and decrease the number of yeasts and molds, the NH4+-N/TN ratio, and the pH. We also found that fermenting whole-plant corn with D-2 significantly increased the in vitro digestibility and the propionic acid content, while also significantly inhibiting methane production. After being exposed to air for 10 days, D-2 can still effectively reduce the total number of yeasts and molds, prevent the decrease in lactic acid bacteria, and inhibit the increase in the pH and NH4+-N/TN ratio of silage products. Overall, D-2 is resistant to pathogenic and rot-causing microorganisms, allowing for easy adaptation to silage production conditions. D-2 can effectively improve aerobic stability and reduce losses in the nutritional value of silage, indicating possible applications for the prevention of silage rot and methane production.

1. Introduction

Silage is a type of moist, stored, and nutrient-rich feed formed by fermenting fresh greenfeed with lactic acid bacteria (LAB) under anaerobic conditions [1]. It breaks the seasonal limitations and is an important guarantee for ruminant overwintering feed [2]. During the ensiling process, LAB (such as Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus reuteri, etc.) produces a large amount of lactic and acetic acids to form an acidic environment. This phenomenon quickly reduces the pH of the silage system to around 4.0, inhibits the activities of undesirable microbes [3], and produces antagonistic metabolites, such as nisin, ε-polylysine, and phenyllactic acid, which inhibit the growth of pathogenic and rot-causing microorganisms [4] and improve the nutritional properties and safety of silage [5]. To some extent, the ensiling of forage grass alleviates the problem of a lack of high-quality forage materials in winter in some farming areas in China. However, during actual production and application, silage faces the risk of pollution and deterioration because forage itself carries impurities, such as rot-causing microorganisms (such as Aspergillus niger, Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium graminearum, etc.), soil, and uncompacted raw materials. After the silo has been opened, the silage comes into contact with oxygen. This results in the recovery and rapid multiplication of rot-causing microorganisms, increased silage pH, reduced aerobic stability and quality, nutrient loss, decreased animal feed utilization, and the production of multiple mycotoxins [6,7], thus compromising the animals’ health.
In addition to the large number of LAB, aerobic microorganisms (such as yeasts, coliforms, and molds) are present in silage and seriously affect its stability during aerobic exposure [8,9]. Responsible for the spoilage of silage are Fusarium, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, and Penicillium [10,11]. It is common to add citric, fumaric, and formic acids and other acidity regulators into silage feed as preservatives to inhibit the proliferation of these spoilage microorganisms and reduce losses [12,13]. However, this process requires repeated spraying, is costly, and negatively affects the palatability of feed. Whole-plant corn silage has become the predominant forage used in dairy cattle diets worldwide [14]. The spoilage of corn silage caused by pathogenic and rot-causing microorganisms can affect the individual herd as well as impact the overall profitability of the industry [15].
Based on this, we hypothesize the existence of microorganisms in silage that can inhibit the growth of pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms without affecting the growth of some LAB. The aim of this study is to screen the microorganism and investigate its impact on fermentation quality, aerobic stability, and in vitro ruminal methane production.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Samples: Rotten silage (whole-plant corn silage) was collected from Huangshan Junfeng ecological cattle farm (Huangshan, China). Whole-plant corn (Qingzhu No. 6) was grown in an experimental field at Anhui Agricultural University (latitude: 31°58′ N, 117°24′ E). Culture media: nutrient, Luria-Bertani (LB), and deMan, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) broths, and potato dextrose agar (PDA) (HB0108, HB0128, HB0384-1, and HB0233; Qingdao Hi-Tech Industrial Park Hope Bio-Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China). About 20 g/L of agar powder (HB8274, Qingdao Hi-Tech Industrial Park Hope Bio-Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China) was added to each broth to prepare solid culture media. Indicator microorganisms: Escherichia coli (E. coli), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), and Salmonella enteritidis (S. enteritidis) were used as pathogenic indicator microorganisms. Aspergillus niger (A. niger), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae), Fusarium oxysporum (F. oxysporum), and Fusarium graminearum (F. graminearum) were used as rot-causing indicator microorganisms. Lactobacillus casei (L. casei), Lactobacillus reuteri (L. reuteri), and Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium) were used as LAB (probiotic) indicator microorganisms. E. coli, S. aureus, S. enteritidis, L. casei, L. reuteri, and E. faecium were obtained from the Anhui Province Engineering Laboratory for Animal Food Quality and Bio-safety (Hefei, China); A. niger, S. cerevisiae, F. oxysporum, and F. graminearum were obtained from the Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Hefei, China).

2.2. Isolation Procedure

(1)
Primary screening: Plant tissues with intact structure and no fungal colonies from rotten silage were collected as test samples. The samples were immersed in sterilized physiological saline (sample/physiological saline = 1 g: 9 mL), vortexed for 5 min, and incubated at 28 °C for 24 h. An asepsis mop was used to collect the sample solution, which was spread onto nutrient agar (NA) and cultured at 37 °C with an O2 concentration ≤ 0.5% for five days. After the microorganisms had grown, the strains with different colony morphologies were picked up separately and subjected to isolation and purification, and the purified strains were inoculated into nutrient broth and incubated statically at 37 °C for 24 h.
(2)
Second screening: To assess the bacteriostatic properties of purified strains using the Kirby–Bauer (K-B) method, a disk diffusion test was performed on the tested bacteria [16]. The fermentation fluid of the tested bacteria, LABs, pathogenic microorganisms, and yeasts in a stationary phase was collected separately, and the concentration of each microbe was adjusted with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) to ×106 CFU/mL. The culture mediums inoculated with rot-causing molds were taken, the spores were rinsed with sterile normal saline containing 0.05% Polysorbate-80, and the mycelia were scraped to prepare a spore suspension or mycelium suspension. Then, the indicator microorganism suspensions were spread using sterilized swabs from the plates. The pathogenic microorganisms were inoculated on an LB medium, the rot-causing microorganisms were inoculated on a PDA medium, and the LAB were inoculated on an MRS medium. After allowing the surface of each medium to dry for 3–5 min, dry sterile ADVANTEC paper (Toyo Roshi Kaisha, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) disks (Φ = 6 mm, δ = 0.7 mm) were placed on the plates and pressed with forceps to ensure complete contact with each agar surface. A total of 10 μL of the tested bacteria solution (×106 CFU/mL) was loaded onto the paper disks on the agar plates, spread, and cultivated for 24 h–72 h at 37 °C (bacteria) or 28 °C (fungi) to observe and measure the inhibition zones. All the experiments were conducted 3 times. The microorganisms that could inhibit the growth of pathogenic and rot-causing microorganisms were screened but had no effect on LAB growth.

2.3. Identification

(1)
Morphological tests: after Gram staining, the morphological characteristics of a single colony after purification were observed using oil immersion microscopy.
(2)
Physiological and biochemical tests: the tests were conducted in accordance with Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology [17].
(3)
Genetic tests: The genomic DNA from stable culture fluid was extracted using a Bacteria Genomic DNA Kit (Trelief®, Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), and its 16S rDNA gene fragment was amplified using two universal bacterial primers (namely, 27F: 5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′ as the forward primer and 1492R: 5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′ as the reverse primer). Totals of 27 μL PCR mix (GoldenStar® T6 Super PCR Mix Ver.2, Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), 1 μL forward primer, 1 μL reverse primer, and 1 μL DNA template were used for the PCR reaction. The PCR reaction conditions are as follows: initial denaturation at 98 °C for 180 s, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 98 °C for 10 s, annealing at 55 °C for 10 s, and extension at 72 °C for 10 s. The final extension was made at 72 °C for 120 s. The PCR products were sent to Nanjing Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China) for sequencing. The 16S rDNA sequence obtained was explored using BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) (accessed on 28 June 2022) to query for highly similar sequences, and the relative phylogenetic position of the isolate was determined using ML tree analysis with MEGA7.0 ver.

2.4. Growth Characteristics

About 2 mL of bacterial solution (OD600 = 0.6) was inoculated into 100 mL of nutrient broth and cultivated at 140 rpm and 37 °C. The OD at 600 nm wavelength was measured every 2 h, and a growth curve was drawn [18]. The fermentation fluid in the stationary phase was inoculated into the nutrient broth to obtain a 1% concentration and cultured at different temperatures (30, 40, 50, 60, and 70 °C) and pH values (2, 4, 6, 8, and 10) for 12 h. Viable counts were determined. The measurements were repeated three times.

2.5. Lactic Acid Tolerance

The pH conditions of silage were simulated. The pH of the nutrient broth was adjusted to 4 by using lactic acid [3], and the nutrient broth was filtered through a Millipore filter (0.2 μm). The tested bacterial solution (×106 CFU/mL) was inoculated into the nutrient broth at 2% inoculum volume and cultured at 37 °C. The samples were collected at 0, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h for viable bacterial counting. The experiment was repeated three times.

2.6. Antibiotic Resistance

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 8 antibiotics for Bacillus spp., regulated by the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) [19] against D-2 (tested bacteria), was tested with the broth microdilution method according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [20]. The concentration (mg/L) range of 8 antibiotics (Shanghai Yuanye Bio-Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) used in the test is as follows [21]: Vancomycin (0.25–16.00); Gentamicin (0.25–32.00); Erythromycin (0.25–16.00); Clindamycin (0.25–8.00); Tetracycline (0.5–32.00); Chloramphenicol (1.00–64.00); Kanamycin (1.00–64.00); Streptomycin (0.25–32.00). The MIC values were determined after being placed at 35 °C and incubated for 20 h, and the results were judged against antibiotic susceptibility standards based on the live bacterial components used as feed additives as specified by EFSA.

2.7. Silage Preparation and Oxygen Exposure

Whole-plant corn (dough stage) was chopped into approximately 1–2 cm segments and then left to wilt via air drying at an ambient temperature to a DM concentration of 31.40% fresh weight (FW). The chopped forage was randomly divided into 10 sub-samples (2 treatments × 5 replicates, about 500 g for each sub-sample) and then randomly assigned to one of the following treatments: (1) D-2, the dosage of inoculation was 1 × 106 CFU/g fresh forage, which was mixed thoroughly in a disinfected plastic container; (2) Control group, in which an equal volume of distilled water was applied under the same conditions. The treated or untreated forages were packed into polyethylene plastic bags (290 mm × 230 mm; fermented feed bag with a one-way valve; Wenzhou Wangting Packaging Co., Ltd., Wenzhou, China) and ensiled individually, vacuum-sealed, and stored in an air-conditioned room (25 ± 2 °C) for 60 d.
The silage samples in the D-2 and control groups at 60 days after fermentation were held separately in a sterile beaker (200 g each), covered with plastic film, incubated at 28 °C and 75% RH, exposed to air at intervals of 12 h, and then thoroughly stirred for 5 min per day with a sterile glass rod; this operation was repeated for 10 d. The samples were collected 60 days after fermentation and 10 days after aerobic exposure for the analysis of fermentation quality, microbial population, and chemical composition.

2.8. Analysis of Aerobic Stability, Chemical Composition, and In Vitro Gas Production of Silage

Each group of silage was evaluated in accordance with the scoring method of the Deutsche Landwirtschafts-Gesellschaft [22]. The samples (10 g) from each group were diluted in 90 mL of sterilized physiological saline, and the mixture was thoroughly mixed. A portion (50 mL) was further diluted to 10−2 with sterilized physiological saline, and 100 µL diluted samples were spread onto MRS or Rose Bengal agar to determine the total LAB, yeast, and mold counts [23]. The MRS plates were incubated anaerobically for 72 h at 37 °C, and the Rose Bengal plates were incubated aerobically at 28 °C for 48 h. The pH of another silage extract aliquot was measured using a KASVI potentiometer [24]. The organic acid and water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) contents were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography methods [25].
The Kjeldahl method [26] was used to determine the total nitrogen (TN) content, and the phenol-sodium hypochlorite method [27] was used to determine the ammoniacal nitrogen (NH4+-N) concentration of silage. The neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) contents of the silage were presented based on their dry matter (DM) bases. The determination methods of DM, NDF, and ADF contents were referenced according to Bai et al. [28] and Van Soest et al. [29].
The ruminal fermentation of whole-plant corn silage samples was conducted using an in vitro gas production technique; the in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and methane production of silage were determined using the method of Khota et al. [30].

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Data on growth characteristics (temperature and pH), bacteriostatic spectrum, and survival rate of D-2 were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA on SPSS 17.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and data on fermentation quality, aerobic stability, digestion, and methane production of whole-plant corn silage were analyzed using unpaired t-tests. All the values are expressed as mean ± SD, and the minimum and maximum levels of significance were set to p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively. Origin7.5 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA) was used to draw the figures.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of D-2

The D-2 strain was isolated through preliminary screening of the plates and a second bacteriostatic evaluation. D-2 grew well on the NA plate and had a milky white color, a nearly round shape, irregular edges, rough and opaque surfaces, bulges in the middle, and wrinkles (Figure 1A). The strain is a Gram-positive, endospore-forming, and rod-shaped microorganism (Figure 1B). The examination of morphological, microscopic, physiological, and biochemical characteristics (Table 1) preliminarily identified D-2 as Bacillus spp. After the PCR amplification of D-2, a 16S rDNA gene fragment of 1438 bp in size was obtained (Figure 1C and Figure A1), and the sequencing results were analyzed through BLAST alignment at NCBI, showing that the isolates had 99.51%–100% sequence homology with the Bacillus spp. gene. The above sequences were collected, and the 16S rDNA of 11 strains with the closest similarity was used to construct a phylogenetic tree using MEGA 7.0 software. For statistical testing, >1000 bootstraps were used. The results are shown in Figure 1D. In accordance with morphological, physiological, biochemical, and molecular observations, the D-2 strain was named Bacillus velezensis D-2.

3.2. Growth Characteristics of D-2

In accordance with the test results, the average value was determined. The time and OD600 represent the abscissa and ordinate, respectively, and a growth curve was drawn. The results are shown in Figure 2A. At 0–2 h, D-2 was in a lag phase, and no significant increase in cell quantity was observed. At 2–10 h, the strain entered the exponential phase, and the cell quantity showed geometric growth. At 10–16 h, the increase in cell quantity slowed down, entering the stationary phase. After 16 h, the strain began to deteriorate.
According to the growth curve, the bacterial liquid in the stationary phase and the equivalent live bacteria (×105 CFU/mL) were treated at different temperatures and pH conditions for 12 h. D-2 could survive at different temperatures, and the pH (Figure 2B,C) and viable cell count significantly increased at 40 °C (p < 0.01), but at pH = 2, the viable cell quantity was 1.45 × 103 CFU/mL, representing a significant reduction (p < 0.01), and at pH = 6, the viable cell quantity was 2.63 × 106 CFU/mL, representing a significant increase (p < 0.01). The results showed that D-2 grows rapidly and is very adaptable at different pHs and temperatures.

3.3. Bacteriostatic Effect of D-2

The bacteriostatic tests showed that D-2 inhibited the pathogenic and rot-causing microorganisms to different degrees but had no inhibitory effect against the LAB, as represented by L. reuteri, E. faecium, and L. casei (Table 2). The inhibition ability of D-2 on the above microorganisms followed this order: F. graminearum > S. aureus > S. enteritidis > F. oxysporum > E. coli > A. nigerS. cerevisiae. The bacteriostatic effect is shown in Figure 3.

3.4. Tolerance of D-2 to an Acidic Environment Where pH = 4

The D-2 survival rates are shown in Table 3. At a pH of four, the survival rate of D-2 within 24 h was 100%, and the viable counts increased significantly (p < 0.05). At 36–48 h, the viable counts decreased, but the results were not significantly different from those observed at 0 h (p > 0.05). The survival rates were over 97%, indicating that the strain exhibited strong lactic acid tolerance. Combined with the growth curve, D-2 entered its decline phase after 16 h. However, at pH 4, the viable counts were still increasing at 24 h, and the difference between the viable counts at 24 and 12 h was not significant (p > 0.05). Thus, the stationary phase of D-2 was speculated to be extended under this condition. After 36 h, the nutrients were depleted in the medium, the bacteria began to decline in number, and a decreased viable count was observed. These values slightly increased at 48 h, but with no significant difference (p > 0.05).

3.5. D-2 Resistance to Eight Antibiotics

The results of the antibiotic sensitivity test of D-2 are shown in Table 4. EFSA specifies the eight antibiotics and MIC values that must be tested for Bacillus spp. It can be seen that for D-2, all of the MIC values are lower than the limited values. D-2 is sensitive to eight antibiotics and meets EFSA’s standards for live bacteria intended to be used as a feed additive.

3.6. Effect of D-2 on Fermentation Quality of Whole-Plant Corn

Using D-2 as the silage strain, the whole-plant corn was ensiled for 60 days, and the fermentative results are shown in Table 5. Compared with the control group, the pH, the number of yeasts and molds, and the NH4+-N/TN ratio of the D-2 group were lower. And the contents of WSC and acetic acid in the D-2 group were significantly increased (p < 0.05). There were no effects on the LAB, TN, DM, NDF, ADF, lactic acid, and propionic acid of whole-plant maize silage when using D-2 or not (p > 0.05).

3.7. Effect of D-2 on the Aerobic Stability of Whole-Plant Corn Silage

The effect of D-2 on the aerobic stability and quality of silage is shown in Table 6. The results showed that, after 10 days of oxygen exposure, the numbers of LAB, TN, and DM in the D-2 group were significantly higher than those in the control group (p < 0.05). The number of yeasts and molds, the NH4+-N quantity, the NH4+-N/TN ratio, and the pH were significantly lower than those in the control group (p < 0.05). The results showed that D-2 could effectively prolong the aerobic stability of silage (p < 0.05).

3.8. Effect of D-2 on In Vitro Digestion and Methane Production of Whole-Plant Corn Silage

After 24 h of in vitro incubation, the sum of acetic and butyric acid did not differ significantly (Table 7). However, compared with the control group, methane production in the D-2 group was significantly decreased (p < 0.05), and the IVDMD and propionic acid totals for the D-2 group were higher than those of the control group.

4. Discussion

The D-2 strain, which was isolated from rotten silage samples, was revealed to be Bacillus velezensis via morphological, physiological, biochemical, and molecular characterization. Bacillus produces many metabolites with antibiotic activity during growth and multiplication [31]. Other studies showed that B. velezensis has a good antagonistic effect against pathogenic and rot-causing microorganisms, such as E. coli, S. aureus, and F. graminearum, and has the potential to promote animal growth and disease resistance [32,33]. These previous findings agree with the results of this study. In addition, the D-2 strain screened in our study shows some inhibitory effects against A. niger, S. cerevisiae, and S. enteritidis, but not against L. reuteri, E. faecium, and L. casei, providing a foundation for the use of this strain during ensiling.
During silage fermentation, the silage central temperature can reach up to 70 °C [34], and the pH of silage systems can reduce to four during the rapid fermentation stage [3]. In this study, D-2 was screened under anoxic conditions, and it can survive in an environment with a pH ranging from two to ten and tolerate 70 °C. D-2 can tolerate different pH values, temperatures, and lactic acid contents, has good antibacterial spectrum characteristics, and is sensitive to the eight tested antibiotics. It also provides a favorable environment for the proliferation of LABs by inhibiting the growth of pathogenic and rot-causing microorganisms consuming oxygen and improving the fermentation quality. D-2 is expected to be successfully applied to corn silage fermentation. When silage is exposed to air, oxygen triggers the activity of microorganisms such as yeasts and molds. In addition, the loss of volatile fatty acids such as acetic and butyric acids in silage results in a decrease in organic acid concentration, diminishing the inhibitory effect of organic acids on yeasts and molds. With prolonged exposure, yeasts, molds, and other spoilage bacteria gradually become the dominant microbes [6,7]. D-2 can inhibit yeasts and molds, but not LAB. Thus, the D-2 group has a significantly lower number of yeasts and molds than the control group does.
NH4+-N exists in silage as free ammonia (NH3) or ammonium salt (NH4+), and their composition ratio depends on the pH; they are present in a free state when the pH is high, or conversely, in an ammonium salt form. In high-quality silage, NH4+-N is present in the form of ammonia salt, but when the silage is seriously decayed, it has a pungent ammonia smell. NH4+-N in silage is produced by the decomposition of nitrogen-containing organic substances by plant enzymes and aerobic bacteria [35]. Therefore, the content of NH4+-N can be used as an indicator of the degree of protein decomposition. The NH4+-N/TN ratio reflects the degree of protein and amino acid decomposition in silage, and a large ratio indicates increased protein decomposition and the poor quality of silage. In this study, D-2 inhibited the proliferation of spoilage microorganisms, resulting in a lower NH4+-N content and NH4+-N/TN ratio in the D-2 group compared to the control group. This finding shows that D-2 has a protective effect on the aerobic stability of silage and can delay proteolysis via aerobic exposure and extend the shelf-life of silage under aerobic exposure. Water activity (WA) is an important indicator of bacterial activity [36]. In this study, the effect of WA is excluded as a plastic film covered the samples, which were placed in an environment with a constant temperature and humidity. Given the decomposition microorganisms, the DM of silage is reduced, which increases the relative proportion of NDF and ADF in the treatment group, but no difference is observed among these groups (p > 0.05). The main feature of silage spoilage is protein degradation, with a minimal effect on the NDF and ADF.
The low pH of silage can inhibit the activity of undesirable microbes and stop the loss of organic matter in silage fermentation [37]. In this study, compared with the control group, the D-2 group had a lower pH in the whole-plant corn silage, and D-2 can also inhibit the activity of undesirable microbes in silage, so it is speculated that the D-2 group loses less organic matter and more DM. In the rumen, a small amount of hydrogen (1 μmol·L−1) is produced during metabolite conversion, and both propionic acid and methane production need to consume hydrogen, causing competition between the two [38]. The content of propionic acid in the D-2 group was higher than that in the control group. It is speculated that after fermentation with D-2, the propionic acid production pathway was enhanced, more hydrogen was utilized by this pathway, the concentration of hydrogen in the rumen was reduced, and methane production was inhibited [39].
D-2 demonstrated many application advantages. However, it was conducted under laboratory conditions, which minimized external interference to the greatest extent possible. In actual production, the natural temperature and larger silos may influence the results. In addition, climatic variations, the chemical composition of plants, and bacterial flora can affect the results of inoculants. Therefore, to effectively apply these findings of D-2 in practical production settings, further verification is required through repeated experiments conducted for two consecutive years or in two different locations to improve the reliability of the data obtained.

5. Conclusions

In this study, a strain of Bacillus velezensis (D-2) with anti-microbial activity was successfully isolated from silage. D-2 could selectively inhibit pathogenic and rot-causing microorganisms that cause silage spoilage and could adapt to the silage production conditions. Inoculation with D-2 could increase aerobic stability, maintain the nutritional quality of silage, and increase methane production. Thus, D-2, which is a potential microbial additive that slows down the spoilage of silage, may effectively protect the aerobic stability of silage and, when fed to ruminants, may reduce their emission of methane gas compared to uninoculated corn silage as feed.

Author Contributions

C.Z.: conceptualization; methodology; writing—original draft. Z.Z.: investigation; writing—original draft. M.Z. and T.Z.: software; validation; formal analysis. Y.W.: formal analysis; data curation. F.W.: writing—review and editing. Y.Z.: resources; writing—review and editing. L.C.: conceptualization; funding acquisition; supervision; writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 32172769), the National Key R&D Program (2021YFD1301004), and the Science and Technology Major Project of Yunnan Province (grant number: 202202AE090032).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Zuojun Liu, Dafeng Xv, and Qiang Yin (Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, CN) and the Anhui Province Engineering Laboratory for Animal Food Quality and Bio-Safety for providing support and assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships, which may be considered potential competing interests: Lijuan Chen, Chen Zhang, Yunhua Zhang, Gangqing Ying, Gangqin Shu, Yili Wang, and Xi Li are the inventors of a Chinese patent (CN CN115161234B, 5 September 2023) related to the procedure for the isolation of Bacillus velezensis from rotten silage described in this manuscript.

Abbreviations

ADF: acid detergent fiber; A. niger, Aspergillus niger; CH4, methane; CFU, colony-forming unit; CLSI, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; DM, dry matter; E. coli, Escherichia coli; E. faecium, Enterococcus faecium; EFSA, European Food Safety Agency; F. oxysporum, Fusarium oxysporum; F. graminearum, Fusarium graminearum; FW, fresh weight; IVDMD, in vitro dry matter digestibility; LAB, lactic acid bacteria; LB, Luria-Bertani (medium); L. casei, Lactobacillus casei; L. reuteri, Lactobacillus reuteri; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; MRS, DeMan, Rogosa, and Sharpe (Medium); MR/VP test, Methyl Red/Voges-Proskaurer test; NA, nutrient agar; ND, not detected; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; NH4+-N, ammoniacal nitrogen; PBS, phosphate buffered saline; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PDA, potato dextrose agar (medium); pH, hydrogen ion concentration; rDNA, ribosomal deoxyribonucleic acid; rRNA, ribosomal ribonucleic acid; S. aureus, Staphylococcus aureus; S. cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; S. enteritidis, Salmonella enteritidis; TN, total nitrogen; WA, water activity; WSC, water-soluble carbohydrate.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Sequencing results of 16S rDNA from the strain.
Figure A1. Sequencing results of 16S rDNA from the strain.
Agriculture 14 00830 g0a1
Table A1. The chemical composition and count of microorganisms in maize green forage before ensilage.
Table A1. The chemical composition and count of microorganisms in maize green forage before ensilage.
Whole-Plant Crop Maize
Number of LAB (log10 CFU/g FW)7.84 ± 0.01
Number of yeasts and molds (log10 CFU/g FW)6.80 ± 0.02
DM (% FW)31.42 ± 0.38
TN (% FW)2.65 ± 0.05
NDF (% DM)33.51 ± 0.37
ADF (% DM)23.81 ± 0.14
pH6.4 ± 0.01
Note: FW, fresh weight; DM, dry matter; TN, total nitrogen; NDF, neutral detergent fiber assayed with heat-stable amylase expressed inclusion of residual ash; ADF, acid detergent fiber expressed inclusion of residual ash.

References

  1. Okoye, C.O.; Wang, Y.; Gao, L.; Wu, Y.; Li, X.; Sun, J.; Jiang, J. The performance of lactic acid bacteria in silage production: A review of modern biotechnology for silage improvement. Microbiol. Res. 2023, 266, 127212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Guo, X.; Xu, D.; Li, F.; Bai, J.; Su, R. Current approaches on the roles of lactic acid bacteria in crop silage. Microb. Biotechnol. 2023, 16, 67–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Weinberg, Z.G. Preservation of forage crops by solid-state lactic acid fermentation-ensiling. In Current Developments in Solid-State Fermentation; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 443–467. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dhundale, V.; Hemke, V.; Desai, D.; Dhundale, P. Evaluation and exploration of lactic acid bacteria for preservation and extending the shelf life of fruit. Int. J. Fruit. Sci. 2018, 4, 355–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huang, Q.L.; Zhou, X.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; Cao, Y. Effects of lactic acid bacteria, molasses and inorganic acid supplementations on fermentation quality and in vitro dry matter disappearance rate of leymus chinensis silage. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 33, 420–427. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mcdonald, P.; Henderson, A.R.; Heron, S.J.E. The Biochemistry of Silage, 2nd ed.Chalcombe Publications: London, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  7. Muck, R.E. Silage microbiology and its control through additives. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2010, 39, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xu, D.M.; Zhang, P.; Ke, W.C.; Guo, X.S. Research process in silage microorganism and its effects on silage quality. Acta Agrestia Sin. 2017, 25, 460–465. [Google Scholar]
  9. Huang, F.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, B.; Zou, C. Research process in silage microorganism and its effect on silage aerobic stability. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2019, 31, 82–89. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cavallarin, L.; Tabacco, E.; Antoniazzi, S.; Borreani, G. Aflatoxin accumulation in whole crop maize silage as a result of aerobic exposure. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2011, 91, 2419–2425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ogunade, I.M.; Martinez-Tuppia, C.; Queiroz, O.C.M.; Jiang, Y.; Drouin, P.; Wu, F.; Vyas, D.; Adesogan, A.T. Silage review: Mycotoxins in silage: Occurrence, effects, prevention, and mitigation. J. Dairy. Sci. 2018, 101, 4034–4059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Muck, R.E.; Nadeau, E.M.G.; Mcallister, T.A.; Contreras-Govea, F.E.; Santos, M.C.; Jr, L.K. Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives. J. Dairy. Sci. 2018, 101, 3980–4000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Queiro, O.C.M.; Ogunade, I.M.; Weinberg, Z.; Adesogan, A.T. Silage review: Foodborne pathogens in silage and their mitigation by silage additives. J. Dairy. Sci. 2018, 101, 4132–4142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, Y.; Ying, G.; Zhang, Z.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, L. Bacillus velezensis promotes the proliferation of lactic acid bacteria and influences the fermentation quality of whole-plant corn silage. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1285582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kristensen, N.B.; Sloth, K.H.; Højberg, O.; Spliid, N.H.; Jensen, C.; Thøgersen, R. Effects of microbial inoculants on corn silage fermentation, microbial contents, aerobic stability, and milk production under field conditions. J. Dairy. Sci. 2010, 8, 3764–3774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Soares, A.; Pestel, C.M.; Leysour, D.R.F.; Bourgoin, G.; Boyer, S.; Caron, F. Area of technical uncertainty for susceptibility testing of amoxicillin/clavulanate against Escherichia coli: Analysis of automated system, etest and disk diffusion methods compared to the broth microdilution reference. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2020, 26, 1685.e1–1685.e6. [Google Scholar]
  17. Buchanan, R.E.; Gibbons, N.E. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 9th ed.; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhang, C.; Yu, X.; Xu, H.; Cui, G.; Chen, L. Action of Bacillus natto 16 on deoxynivalenol (DON) from wheat flour. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 131, 2317–2324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP). Guidance on the as-sessment of bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobials of human and veterinary importance. EFSA J. 2012, 10, 2740. [Google Scholar]
  20. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically, 11th ed.; CLSI Standard M07; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  21. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute. Methods for Antimicrobial Dilution and Disk Susceptibility Testing of Infrequently Isolated or Fastidious Bacteria, 3rd ed.; CLSI Guideline M45; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.D.; Zheng, N.; Wang, J.; Zhang, P. Research rrogress in sensory evaluation of sliage. China Dairy Cattle 2019, 1, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  23. Wang, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhou, W.; Yang, F.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Q. Effects of wilting and Lactobacillus plantarum addition on the fermentation quality and microbial community of Moringa oleifera leaf silage. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Carlos, E.F.T.; Renato, S.F. Sensory evaluation of winter cereal silage. J. Chem. Chem. Eng. 2017, 11, 102–106. [Google Scholar]
  25. Cai, Y.; Benno, Y.; Ogawa, M.; Kumai, S. Effect of applying lactic acid bacteria isolated from forage crops on fermentation characteristics and aerobic deterioration of silage. J. Dairy. Sci. 1999, 82, 520–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Official Methods of Analysis; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  27. Broderick, G.A.; Kang, J.H. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. J. Dairy. Sci. 1980, 63, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bai, J.; Franco, M.; Ding, Z.; Hao, L.; Ke, W.; Wang, M.; Xie, D.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Ai, L.; et al. Effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus subtilis on fermentation, dynamics of bacterial community and their functional shifts of whole-plant corn silage. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2022, 13, 864–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Van, S.P.J.; Robertson, J.B.; Lewis, B.A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy. Sci. 1991, 74, 3583–3597. [Google Scholar]
  30. Khota, W.; Pholsen, S.; Higgs, D.; Cai, Y. Fermentation quality and in vitro methane production of sorghum silage prepared with cellulase and lactic acid bacteria. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 30, 1568–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zhang, D.F.; Gao, Y.X.; Wang, Y.J.; Liu, C.; Shi, C.B. Advances in taxonomy, antagonistic function and application of Bacillus velezensis. Microbiol. China 2020, 47, 3634–3649. [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, X.; Wang, X.; Shi, X.; Wang, B.; Li, M.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, S. Antifungal effect of volatile organic compounds from Bacillus velezensis CT32 against Verticillium dahliae and Fusarium oxysporum. Processes 2020, 8, 1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, S.; Zhang, B.; Xiang, D.; Zhao, Z.; Chang, Y.; Sha, Q.; Zhao, Y. Effects of Bacillus velezensis on growth performance, fecal microbiota and metabolites in pigs. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 32, 5622–5635. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang, L.; Liu, D.; Shao, T. The application of plastic sheet in silage and silage making. China Herbiv. Sci. 2007, 1, 55–57. [Google Scholar]
  35. Yan, J.; Wang, W.; Gao, Y.; Pan, Z.; Mu, S. Rapid determintion of ammoniacal nitrogen in silage by automatic kjeldahl apparatus. Cereal Feed Ind. 2009, 4, 47–48. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lv, C.; Jin, J.; Wang, P.; Dai, X.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, M.; Xing, F. Interaction of water activity and temperature on the growth, gene expression and aflatoxin production by Aspergillus flavus on paddy and polished rice. Food Chem. 2019, 293, 472–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jiang, F.G.; Cheng, H.J.; Liu, D.; Wei, C.; An, W.J.; Wang, Y.F.; Sun, H.T.; Song, E.L. Treatment of whole-plant corn silage with lactic acid bacteria and organic acid enhances quality by elevating acid content, reducing pH, and inhibiting undesirable microorganisms. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 593088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Guo, Y.Q.; Hu, W.L.; Liu, J.X. Methanogens and manipulation of methane production in the rumen. Acta Microbiol. Sin. 2005, 1, 145–148. [Google Scholar]
  39. Asanuma, N.; Hino, T. Prevention of rumen acidosis and suppression of ruminal methanogenesis by augmentation of lactate utilization. Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho 2004, 75, 543–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Identification of D-2. (A) Morphology. (B) Gram staining and optical micrographs. (C) PCR amplification electrophoresis result of D-2 16S rDNA. (D) Evolutionary relationships of strain D-2 based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences.
Figure 1. Identification of D-2. (A) Morphology. (B) Gram staining and optical micrographs. (C) PCR amplification electrophoresis result of D-2 16S rDNA. (D) Evolutionary relationships of strain D-2 based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences.
Agriculture 14 00830 g001
Figure 2. Growth characteristics of D-2. (A) Growth curve. (B) Living D-2 concentration under different temperatures. (C) Living D-2 concentration at different pH values. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatment groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Growth characteristics of D-2. (A) Growth curve. (B) Living D-2 concentration under different temperatures. (C) Living D-2 concentration at different pH values. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatment groups (p < 0.05).
Agriculture 14 00830 g002
Figure 3. Bacteriostatic effect of D-2. (A) S. aureus; (B) S. cerevisiae; (C) A. niger; (D) F. oxysporum; (E) F. graminearum; (F) E. coli; (G) S. enteritidis; (H) L. reuteri; (I) E. faecium; (J) L. casei.
Figure 3. Bacteriostatic effect of D-2. (A) S. aureus; (B) S. cerevisiae; (C) A. niger; (D) F. oxysporum; (E) F. graminearum; (F) E. coli; (G) S. enteritidis; (H) L. reuteri; (I) E. faecium; (J) L. casei.
Agriculture 14 00830 g003
Table 1. Physiological and biochemical identification results of D-2.
Table 1. Physiological and biochemical identification results of D-2.
Physiological and Biochemical TestReactionPhysiological and Biochemical TestReaction
Anaerobic fermentation test+Esculin hydrate test+
MR/VP testMR (−)Xylose fermentation test+
VP (+)Arabinose fermentation test
Citrate testRaffinose test
Propionate testStarch hydrolysis test+
Catalase testIndole test
Mannitol fermentation testNitrate reduction test+
Note: MR/VP test, Methyl Red/Voges-Proskauer test; “+” positive; “−” negative.
Table 2. Bacteriostatic spectrum of D-2.
Table 2. Bacteriostatic spectrum of D-2.
IndicatorInhibitory Circle Radius (mm)IndicatorInhibitory Circle Radius (mm)
E. coli10.66 ± 0.27 eF. oxysporum11.74 ± 0.26 d
S. aureus17.56 ± 0.54 bF. graminearum19.60 ± 0.15 a
S. enteritidis12.22 ± 0.50 cL. reuteri
A. niger9.58 ± 0.28 fE. faecium
S. cerevisiae9.08 ± 0.52 fL. casei
Note: “−” negative; no bacteriostasis. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatment groups (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Survival rate of D-2 at pH 4.
Table 3. Survival rate of D-2 at pH 4.
ItemsTime
0 h12 h24 h36 h48 h
Viable count (log10 CFU/mL)5.49 ± 0.02 b5.52 ± 0.03 a5.53 ± 0.01 a5.46 ± 0.01 b5.44 ± 0.07 b
Survival rate (%)10010010097.2898.29
Increasing rate (%)0+12.93+16.33−2.72−1.70
Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatment groups (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Antibiotic sensitivity test of D-2.
Table 4. Antibiotic sensitivity test of D-2.
AntibioticsMIC (mg/L)Criterion (mg/L)Susceptibility
Vancomycin1≤4S
Gentamicin1≤4S
Erythromycin0.5≤4S
Clindamycin0.5≤4S
Tetracycline2≤8S
Chloramphenicol4≤8S
Kanamycin2≤8S
Streptomycin4≤8S
Note: S, susceptible.
Table 5. Microorganism counts, chemical composition, fermentative characteristics, and quality of whole-plant corn at 60 days after fermentation.
Table 5. Microorganism counts, chemical composition, fermentative characteristics, and quality of whole-plant corn at 60 days after fermentation.
ParameterControlD-2
Number of LABs (log10 CFU/g FW)8.24 ± 0.018.20 ± 0.03
Number of yeasts and molds (log10 CFU/g FW)4.80 ± 0.02 a2.65 ± 0.01 b
NH4+-N (% FW)0.32 ± 0.020.28 ± 0.03
TN (% FW)2.30 ± 0.052.33 ± 0.02
NH4+-N/TN (%)13.64 ± 0.13 a12.22 ± 0.20 b
DM (% FW)30.50 ± 0.5031.05 ± 0.62
NDF (% DM)34.22 ± 0.0734.24 ± 0.10
ADF (% DM)24.32 ± 0.0224.27 ± 0.06
WSC (% DM)3.38 ± 0.03 b4.61 ± 0.02 a
pH3.65 ± 0.01 a3.50 ± 0.02 b
Lactic acid (% DM)8.36 ± 0.038.21 ± 0.03
Acetic acid (% DM)1.74 ± 0.01 b1.96 ± 0.03 a
Propionic acid (×10−2% DM)0.82 ± 0.010.87 ± 0.01
Butyric acid (% DM)NDND
Note: FW, fresh weight; DM, dry matter; TN, total nitrogen; NDF, neutral detergent fiber assayed with a heat-stable amylase expressed inclusion of residual ash; ADF, acid detergent fiber expressed inclusion of residual ash; WSC, water-soluble carbohydrate. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatment groups (p < 0.05). ND means not detected.
Table 6. Aerobic stability of whole-plant corn silage after 10 days of oxygen exposure.
Table 6. Aerobic stability of whole-plant corn silage after 10 days of oxygen exposure.
ParameterControlD-2
Number of LABs (log10 CFU/g FW)6.25 ± 0.27 b7.82 ± 0.02 a
Number of yeasts and molds (log10 CFU/g FW)6.18 ± 0.03 a4.60 ± 0.11 b
NH4+-N (% FW)0.45 ± 0.05 a0.30 ± 0.06 b
TN (% FW)2.22 ± 0.06 b2.28 ± 0.02 a
NH4+-N/TN (%)20.36 ± 0.22 a13.23 ± 0.19 b
DM (% FW)27.48 ± 0.80 b29.53 ± 0.72 a
NDF (% DM)34.55 ± 0.0333.87 ± 0.16
ADF (% DM)25.08 ± 0.1524.79 ± 0.04
pH6.60 ± 0.01 a4.26 ± 0.04 b
Note: FW, fresh weight; DM, dry matter; TN, total nitrogen; NDF, neutral detergent fiber assayed with heat-stable amylase expressed inclusion of residual ash; ADF, acid detergent fiber expressed inclusion of residual ash. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatment groups (p < 0.05).
Table 7. IVDMD, methane production, and volatile fatty acid concentration at 24 h incubation of whole-plant corn silage.
Table 7. IVDMD, methane production, and volatile fatty acid concentration at 24 h incubation of whole-plant corn silage.
ParameterControlD-2
IVDMD (%)61.33 ±1.52 b63.15 ± 1.70 a
CH4 (L/kg IVDMD)12.88 ± 0.57 a10.13 ± 0.62 b
Acetic acid (mmol/L)23.13 ± 0.3022.61 ± 0.52
Propionic acid (mmol/L)18.42 ± 0.34 b22.56 ± 0.03 a
Butyric acid (mmol/L)5.85 ± 0.155.60 ± 0.20
Note: IVDMD, in vitro dry matter digestibility. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatment groups (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, T.; Wan, F.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, L. Isolation of Bacillus velezensis from Silage and Its Effect on Aerobic Stability and In Vitro Methane Production of Whole-Plant Corn Silage. Agriculture 2024, 14, 830. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14060830

AMA Style

Zhang C, Zhang Z, Zhu M, Wang Y, Zhou T, Wan F, Zhang Y, Chen L. Isolation of Bacillus velezensis from Silage and Its Effect on Aerobic Stability and In Vitro Methane Production of Whole-Plant Corn Silage. Agriculture. 2024; 14(6):830. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14060830

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Chen, Zimo Zhang, Mengfan Zhu, Yongliang Wang, Tangtang Zhou, Fachun Wan, Yunhua Zhang, and Lijuan Chen. 2024. "Isolation of Bacillus velezensis from Silage and Its Effect on Aerobic Stability and In Vitro Methane Production of Whole-Plant Corn Silage" Agriculture 14, no. 6: 830. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14060830

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop