Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Maize Legume Intercropping on Energy Indices and GHG Emissions as a Result of Climate Change
Previous Article in Journal
Precision Breeding and Consumer Safety: A Review of Regulations for UK Markets
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Weedy Rice Infestation in Malaysia: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go?

by
Intan Filzah Mahmod
1,
Sharifah Nurnabilah Syed Bakar
1,
Muhamad Shakirin Mispan
1,2,
Farahaniza Supandi
1,
Zulqarnain Mohamed
1 and
Mohd Zuwairi Saiman
1,2,*
1
Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
2
Centre for Research in Biotechnology for Agriculture (CEBAR), Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2024, 14(8), 1307; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14081307
Submission received: 23 June 2024 / Revised: 6 August 2024 / Accepted: 6 August 2024 / Published: 7 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Crop Protection, Diseases, Pests and Weeds)

Abstract

:
Weedy rice is a notorious weed in the rice agroecosystem. Its infestation has caused significant economic loss in many rice-production countries, including Malaysia. In Malaysia, weedy rice consists of a genetic admixture of cultivated and wild traits, resulting in a highly competitive ability against cultivated rice for resources. The morphology and genetic plasticity of weedy rice provide several adaptive advantages, enabling it to thrive in rice agroecosystems and become a serious weed infesting Malaysian rice granaries. Previous strategies in combating weedy rice have often been less effective since weedy rice is easily adapted to a wide range of environments. In this review, we address the weedy rice issue in Malaysia and the progress of weedy rice studies. A future direction on weedy rice research via omics study is also discussed to propose solutions for improvement in weed control, good agronomic practices, and food security.

1. Introduction

Weedy rice infestation in rice fields has been reported in many countries, including Malaysia. The estimated loss of yield per season in 2004 due to weedy rice infestation in Peninsular Malaysia was about USD 24 million [1]. In 1996, there were more than 19,900 ha of rice granaries in Malaysia infested by weedy rice [2]. Studies found that a weedy rice infestation at 10% of the rice field can cause up to an 80% yield loss, thus affecting the economy and threatening food security [3,4,5]. Until now, weedy rice has continuously been an unsolved weed problem in the rice industry.
Weedy rice (Oryza spp.) is a conspecific weed of cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.). It is well known as red rice in many temperate countries due to the red pigmentation of the pericarp. In Malaysia, weedy rice is locally known as ‘padi angin’ (literal translation as ‘wind rice’) due to the ease of seed shattering attributed to the wind. It has diverse morphological traits resembling the admixture of wild rice and cultivated rice [6,7]. Weedy rice primarily constitutes the diploid AA-genome species (2n = 24) with perfect synapsis and high sexual compatibility, as well as the pollen and panicle fecundity of F1 hybrids [8,9]. At the same time, wild rice and cultivated rice can hybridize, thus producing competitive weedy rice in nature [4,7,10].
Weedy rice is descended from several groups of rice: indica, japonica, and aus, which are domesticated from different parts of Asia [11,12]. Regardless of the number of geographically different domestication events, all evidence suggests that indica and japonica rice are descended from pre-differentiated ancestral Oryza rufipogon populations [13,14,15]. The Malaysian rice landraces encompassed a mixture of indica and japonica subspecies before being changed by elite rice cultivars [16]. Additionally, these elite cultivars were introduced during the industrialized farming era of Malaysia and were derived from the exotic germplasm of the indica line [16]. The weediness traits or weedy crop relatives can evolve independently in weedy rice through a combination of de novo mutation, standing genetic variation, and adaptive introgression to exploit agriculture ecosystems [9].
The evolution of weedy rice is fundamentally entwined with the domestication history of its cultivated relative (Figure 1). There are four hypotheses of the origin of weedy rice or its evolution: (1) weedy rice may have evolved from the adaptation of wild rice that continuously disturbed cultivated rice habitats; (2) weedy rice may have originated from escaped cultivated rice seeds; (3) natural hybridization between cultivated and wild rice, which could have shared characteristics from both to form weedy rice; (4) hybridization between cultivated rice [17,18].
In this review, we address the weedy rice issue in Malaysia and the progress in rice agronomic practices in the country. We then explore the adaptive traits of weedy rice that contribute to its resilience and persistence in crop fields. Building on this foundation, the review discusses the extensive research efforts in Malaysia aimed at addressing these challenges. The manuscript then transitions to the potential of omics studies as future-oriented, knowledge-based strategies for weed management, highlighting the importance of genomics in revealing the genetic underpinnings of weedy rice. Furthermore, we consider the potential use of metabolomics to elucidate the biochemical processes that support weedy rice’s survival and competitiveness. Finally, the review envisions the future of weedy rice research in Malaysia, emphasizing the integration of multi-omics approaches and the adoption of cutting-edge artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to enhance precision agriculture and develop innovative management solutions.

2. Weedy Rice Issues in Malaysia

Weedy rice was discovered in rice-growing regions in 1846 in North and South America, Europe in the 1970s, and various Asian countries in the 1990s [19]. The direct seeding method was reported to be the main cause of the emergence of weedy rice in the majority of rice agroecosystems in the world [2,5,20]. In Malaysia, weedy rice infestation was first reported in 1988 at Tanjung Karang, Selangor, and then spread sporadically to the northern part (Muda area, Kedah, Malaysia) in 1990 [20,21]. Five years later, weedy rice was reported in Besut, Terengganu [22] and subsequently in Seberang Perai, Penang, and Kerian, Perak in 1996 [23,24]. Within a decade from the first reported incidence, weedy rice was recorded in rice fields in MADA (Kedah, Malaysia), Ketara (Terengganu, Malaysia), and Seberang Perak and Kerian Sg. Manik, (Perak, Malaysia) [1,25,26,27]. By the year 2000, the spread of weedy rice almost covered all of Peninsular Malaysia, with at least a 10% infestation in every rice granary [5,28]. By this time, weedy rice was identified as the most pervasive weed in the Muda area, while the infestation level in Kedah ranges from less than 10% to more than 20% coverage [27,29]. In Besut, Terengganu, and Tanjung Karang, Selangor, more than 50% of rice granaries have been reported to be infested with weedy rice [1,23].
The practice of traditional transplanting has provided an early growth advantage for the rice cultivar to compete with weedy rice, together with the careful selection of cultivars without any weedy rice contamination. Therefore, the agronomic shift of rice cultivation practice in Peninsular Malaysia from rice transplanting to direct seeding has increased the possibility of seed contamination during the sowing [2,5,20,30]. The changes in agronomic practices in Malaysia are illustrated in Table 1. As a result of the cultivation of weak, semi-dwarf indica-type varieties, weedy rice infestation has become apparent. Poor land preparation contributed to the development and rapid spread of weedy rice, consequently enhancing its survival rate in seed banks [3,5,31]. In addition, most farmers did not follow the suggested standard operating procedures for land preparations due to the high investment in cost and time, which consequently contributed to the continuous infestation of weedy rice throughout the country [30,32]. In 2019, weedy rice finally reached east Malaysia (Borneo of Malaysia), where it was first reported in Sabah in rice fields across the Kota Belud and Kota Marudu regions [6,33]. The agronomic shift, coupled with modern mechanization in farming, contributed to the accidental introduction of weedy rice from Peninsular Malaysia into Borneo [33].
In addition to different agronomic techniques, environmental conditions also have an impact on the rate of resistance in the evolution of weedy rice [34,35]. In addition to the shift to direct seeding, which influences the spread of weedy rice with a high-shattering biotype (increased contaminated seeds), remnants from old cultivars (seedbanks) and the use of large sharing harvesters also contribute to the proliferation and dominance of weedy rice in Malaysia [5]. Thus, developing management measures thoroughly is necessary to delay the evolution and spread of weedy rice. Despite the rapid and continuous process of changing the rice ecosystems and, consequently, the weedy rice landscape, the knowledge about weed biology and ecology, specifically Malaysian weedy rice, is still inadequate to understand its fast adaptation.
Weedy rice, in general, is taller in stature than the modern semi-dwarf cultivated rice varieties in Malaysia. Mechanical control by removing the weedy rice panicle before maturity is the only method to manage weedy rice in the rice fields [5,36]. As a result, this occurrence has led to the emergence of new biotypes of weedy rice where it has a similar stature to cultivated rice. These new biotypes were first documented in Selangor in 2010 [2]. In addition, the existence of the new biotypes of weedy rice (NBWR) has also contributed to a complex situation that does not alert most farmers because the weed can be hidden in the rice fields, making it difficult to control [2].
This serious weedy rice infestation in Malaysia prompted the Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI) to introduce the Clearfield® Rice Production System (CPS) in 2010 [37]. MR220CL1 and MR220CL2 are CPS varieties tolerant to the imidazolinone (IMI) herbicides. CPS was originally developed in the United States of America (USA) by mutation breeding and then adopted in Malaysia by crossing an IMI-TR Line No. 1770 from the USA with a Malaysian rice variety MR220. MR220CL1 and MR220CL2 are tolerance to imazapic and imazethapyr, which are acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS)-inhibiting herbicides from the imidazolinone family [35,38,39].
This successful strategy for weed management and high-yield production gained popularity among farmers with its new technology [5,35]. The continuous use of CPS allowed the replacement of the soil seed bank with herbicide-resistant populations in the future. However, the CPS system was not achieving the target of managing weedy rice due to the failure of farmers to strictly follow the CPS stewardship guidelines [39,40]. This has caused new problems where weedy rice had ‘escaped’ the CPS treatment and became resistant to the imidazolinone herbicide [5,35,39,40]. Herbicide resistance is an inherited trait for weedy rice to survive, and its population reproduces more extensively, thus increasing the resistant allele frequency in populations [7].

3. Adaptive Traits of Weedy Rice

Weedy rice adapts to the rice agroecosystem by having complex characters, constituting the admixture between wild- and cultivated-like traits [7,17,41]. Its biotypes can have wild-like traits such as black hull, long awn, red or pigmented pericarp, tall stature, and easy shattering, or crop mimic traits, including straw hull, white pericarp, and semi-dwarf height [42]. At the vegetative stage, weedy rice is difficult to distinguish in the rice field due to its close morphological characteristics with cultivated rice. However, weedy rice is perceptible at flowering due to its relatively shorter maturation period (90–120 days) than cultivated rice (115–120 days), in addition to its distinctive characteristics in the field such as tall stature, open panicle, and easy shattering [43,44].
To compete in the rice agroecosystem, especially in Malaysia, weedy rice generally grows higher (90–150 cm) than cultivated rice (60–70 cm). Tall stature is one of the weedy rice strategies to compete for light while creating shade for its competitors, i.e., cultivated rice [4,45]. Weedy rice also produces a high number of tillers to adapt in the rice fields, which then helps to produce more panicles and seeds [4,46]. A high tiller number at the vegetative stage also gives an advantage to weedy rice, as a high leaf area index accumulates more nitrogen and sucrose, leading to increased biomass production [47]. Mahmod et al. [42] found that weedy rice morphology is highly diverse and dispersed across Peninsular Malaysia. They also found a cluster of weedy rice biotypes that have a set of morphological characters that resemble cultivated rice, especially in terms of shorter stature, awnless, and straw-colored seeds. In line with Sudianto et al. [7], the awnless biotypes are easily found in all rice granaries across Peninsular Malaysia compared to the awned biotype [42]. These prove the existence of the mimicry adaptation in the weedy rice population.
Weedy rice is locally known as ‘padi angin’ (wind rice) in Malaysia, attributed to its phenotypic characteristic, i.e., the easy seed shattering by the wind [2,5]. The inheritance of several wild-like traits in weedy rice, such as smaller grains with awn, facilitates seed dispersion by wind and animals [48,49]. Easy-shattering seeds enhance the capacity of weedy rice to be widely dispersed in the field and enrich the seed bank [7,50]. The easy shattering trait, along with seed dormancy, increases the survivability of weedy rice seeds in the seed bank [5,51,52]. Furthermore, seed dormancy is highly correlated with the pigmentation of the seed pericarp, which supports the quality decrement of cultivated rice production in the country [2,34]. Therefore, preserving the wild traits enables weedy rice to infest extensively in various rice agroecosystems.
In the rice agroecosystem, weedy rice is a highly polymorphic group of plants. Weedy rice biotypes encompass variations in every morphological trait compared to the cultivated rice varieties [7,53]. Mimicking cultivated rice is one of the adaptive mechanisms of weedy rice in the rice agroecosystem [42,54,55]. Due to the extensive manual weeding of weedy rice [28,56], weedy rice with short or similar height to cultivated rice emerged in Malaysian rice fields, indicating the capability of weedy rice to select favorable traits for survival [2]. Short stature also gives weedy rice erect flag leaves to increase photosynthesis capability [57,58]. Erect leaves improve the light-intercepting of plant architecture to induce plant growth. At the same time, the semi-dwarf trait is correlated with high tillering, thus preventing the plant from lodging [44,59]. The crop-mimicking traits promoting aggressive growth and development create unequal competition between cultivated and weedy rice biotypes [53,57,60,61].
The ability to adapt by mimicry helps weedy rice survive in diverse rice agroecosystems [53]. Certain weedy ‘red’ rice biotypes mimic the cultivar by having low seed shattering and/or straw hull phenotypes, which are involuntarily harvested together with cultivated rice, resulting in the contamination of the seed stock due to the red pericarp [5]. Straw hull seeds with a red pericarp can mostly be found in every rice granary in Peninsular Malaysia [7,42]. The contamination of the seed stock has a negative impact on yield quality, reduces rice yield production, and increases the dispersion of weedy rice.
Several studies have suggested that weedy rice can adapt to current climate change [62,63]. High tolerance to abiotic (drought, cold, salinity) and biotic (diseases) stresses is a powerful defense system in weedy rice [58,64,65]. It can also easily adapt to changes in agronomic practices [5,58]. For example, weedy rice reportedly ‘escaped’ and became resistant to imidazolinone herbicide [35,39,66]. Since 2010, Malaysia has implemented the Clearfield® Production System (CPS) to reduce the infestation of weedy rice and, at the same time, increase rice production [37,38,67,68,69]. However, resistance to the imidazolinone herbicide indicates the adaptation dynamic of the weedy rice. The high correlation between resistance and various morphological and physiological traits shows the ability of weedy rice to adapt to agronomic practices and environmental changes [70]. These polymorphic traits in weedy rice are remarkable and need to be studied for a better understanding of the plant’s interactions with its environment, which is useful for weed management and crop improvement.

4. Weedy Rice Research in Malaysia

The study of weedy rice in Malaysia has become a highlight after the serious weedy rice infestation in the early 1990s [20,25,71]. Table 2 summarizes several research aspects that have been conducted on weedy rice in Malaysia, including morphological, physiological, ecological, genetics, weed management, and metabolomic studies.
Table 2. Research progress of weedy rice in Malaysia.
Table 2. Research progress of weedy rice in Malaysia.
CategoryMethodsFindingsArea/Samples
Coverage
References
EcologyField samplings, field surveysMore than 19,900 ha of rice farms were damaged by weedy rice.Peninsular Malaysia[25]
New biotypes of weedy rice (NBWR) with shorter plant height were first reported. Most farm blocks showed clump or under-dispersed spatial distribution.Selangor [2]
The relative abundant indices of annual weeds were more dominant than perennial weeds.Kedah [72]
The Lloyd patchiness index revealed that more than 50% of surveyed field blocks in five states displayed uniform distribution.Peninsular Malaysia[42]
GenomicPCR, SSRThe high genetic diversity showed that Malaysian weedy rice had diverse origins: de-domestication from cultivated rice, adaptation from wild rice, and hybridization between cultivated and wild rice or between cultivated rice and weedy rice.Peninsular Malaysia[16,20,53,71,73,74]
Sabah weedy rice was shaped by accidentally introducing Peninsular Malaysia’s weedy rice strains. Cultivated rice was highly diverse compared to Peninsular, which supported the progenitor of Sabah cultivar-like weedy rice. Sabah[6,33]
All weedy rice populations showed cross-resistance to the IMI herbicides imazapic and imazapyr due to a Ser-653-Asn mutation in the AHAS gene resulting from an herbicide-insensitive AHAS enzyme.Kedah,
Perlis
[75]
The multiplex PCR assays employed a standard agarose-based gel electrophoresis system to simultaneously disclose at least two major grain quality (amylose content and fragrance) and biotic stress (blast, sheath blight, and bacterial leaf blight) genes in rice.Not applicable[8]
Morphology and
Physiology
Greenhouse and field experimentHeterogenous plant height, hull color, pericarp color, awn, and maturity period. Most weedy rice had seed shattering. Greater in growth development, tiller number, LAIPeninsular Malaysia[1,7,42,43,44,73,76,77]
The rice and weed dry matter, rice plant height, chlorophyll content, leaf area, number of tillers, filled grain, 1000 grain weight and grain yield were reduced with an increased crop–weed competition period.Selangor, Pahang[53,61]
The germination rate was found to be related to the degree of dormancy, but it had no influence on the range of cardinal temperatures.Peninsular Malaysia[78]
A high degree of seed dormancy retained their viability for more than 200 days once imbibed.Selangor[70]
Weed ManagementField samplings and surveysSites that practiced integrated weed management with regular surveillance and monitoring had less weedy rice infestation and higher rice yields and vice versa with control. Major weed populations are F. miliacea, L. Hyssopifolia and O. sativa.Perlis,
Kedah
[79]
Most farmers ignored the technology and deliberately disregarded stewardship guidelines. Their perceptions of the weedy rice issue varied from region to region, leading to differing methods for controlling weedy rice. Farmers were more likely to use herbicides than mechanical to control weedy rice.Peninsular Malaysia[80,81]
Greenhouse and field experimentWeedy rice populations were effectively controlled, resulting in an average 15% yield increment under the Clearfield® Production System (CPS) in direct seeded fields. The critical period for weed control ranged from approximately 12–16 to 53–60 DAS.Perak,
Penang
[28,37]
Weedy rice was found to be more resistant to OnDuty® (premix of imazapic and imazapyr) than the susceptible weedy rice.Perlis, Kedah
Penang
[39]
Weedy rice in Malaysia developed various degrees of resistance toward IMI herbicide.Selangor[66]
MetabolomicField sampling, NMRWeedy rice and cultivated rice can be clearly distinguished based on metabolome profiles. It was found that the metabolite profiles of weedy rice from the east coast are different from the west coast area of Peninsular Malaysia.Peninsular Malaysia[82]
Weedy rice infestations in Malaysia were temporally dynamic [2,25,29]. For instance, surveys on weedy rice in 1995 revealed the existence of weedy rice in the majority of rice granaries in Peninsular Malaysia. Yet, it did not significantly affect the rice industry. However, the infestation rapidly increased a year later, with more than 19,900 ha of rice granaries affected [25,29]. Moreover, weedy rice was discovered in 82% of Muda rice fields in 2001, but a year later, only about half the fields had at least a 10% infestation rate [29]. But then, in 2005, the infestation tremendously increased when 91% of the rice fields were infested [25,83]. This temporal dynamic infestation might be due to the early shift to direct seeding from manual transplanting and the adoption of modern machinery, causing cross-contamination between rice fields. This ‘roller-coaster’ dynamic of weedy rice infestation caused difficulties in managing weedy rice in the country [2].
Research on the morphological aspect of weedy rice has mainly been focused on the variation in the morphology and physiology of weedy rice. Weedy rice in Malaysia has vegetative and reproductive superiority compared to cultivated rice, including taller stature and higher tiller number [1,44,73,76]. It has also been reported to morphologically mimic and have a similar height to local cultivars [2,42]. Comprehensive surveys of weedy rice across Peninsular Malaysia based on more than 20 trait descriptors have shown that the weeds are morphologically diverse [7,42]. The morphological variation in Malaysian weedy rice traits includes different pigmentation of grains, grain types, panicle types, grain weight, maturity period, number of tillers, plant height, and percentage of seeds shattering. Sudianto et al. [7] identified four major clusters of weedy rice: (1) resembles wild Oryza populations, (2) mimic elite indica rice cultivar, (3) brown-hull biotypes, and (4) admixture of weedy traits.
Weedy rice from different geographical locations comprises various morphological characters; for instance, the awned seeds were more abundant in the west coast region of Peninsular Malaysia, while the black hull color was prevalent in the east coast region [7]. Mahmod et al. [42] found that most weedy rice from the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia are represented with traits similar to cultivated rice, especially in terms of shorter stature and awnless seeds, while weedy rice with high tiller and panicle number were mainly from the west coast region.
Studies on the origin of weedy rice in Malaysia have received little attention from weed scientists. A molecular study on weedy rice origin in the mid-90s based on the randomized amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers indicated that weedy rice in Malaysia was genetically diverse, which permits the selection of adaptive traits required by cultivation practices [20]. Based on further genetic comparisons among cultivated rice, wild rice (Oryza rufipogon), and weedy rice variants, weedy rice was closely related to cultivated rice compared to wild rice, indicating that Malaysian weedy rice may derive from local cultivars [20,71]. However, no extensive research was conducted to advance the study on the origin of weedy rice in Malaysia until Song et al. [16] investigated 207 weedy rice samples from 17 populations in Peninsular Malaysia, using 24 polymorphic microsatellite markers. In contrast with the study by Abdullah et al. [71], Song et al. [16] showed that the diverse weedy rice strains were shaped by the introgression of weed-adaptive alleles (sh4 and Bh4) from the Oryza rufipogon population, which evolved from the hybridization process with modern-bred elite rice cultivars.
Despite having a close morphological resemblance, Malaysian weedy rice strains are genetically different from weedy rice in the USA, indicating the independent evolutionary origin of weedy rice in the country. Further investigation of weedy rice in east Malaysia (Borneo) conducted using genome-wide SNPs reported that weedy rice in the region may have originated from two paths. First, weedy rice in east Malaysia has similarities with the local cultivars, indicating a hybridization event between cultivars, and second, the weedy rice displayed a wild-like genetic makeup, which indicates the possibility of cross-contamination with weedy rice from Peninsular Malaysia [33].
The shift towards industrialized rice farming and the continuous development of modernized elite cultivars will favor the continued proliferation of weedy rice in Malaysia [5,16]. Therefore, continuous and large-scale genetic screening and high throughput analysis of weedy rice are required to understand and predict future infestations and potential management of weedy rice. Using cultivated and weedy rice samples from Malaysia, Mohd Hanafiah et al. [8] successfully developed a PCR-based multiplex assay for large-scale genotyping of rice genetic resources. The universal multiplex protocol is effective in detecting rice grain quality (amylose content and fragrance) and biotic stress resistance traits (blast, sheath blight, and bacterial leaf blight) in both cultivated and weedy rice. Moreover, the metabolomics study of weedy rice in Malaysia was first reported by analyzing weedy rice samples collected from different areas in Peninsular Malaysia together with several cultivated rice [82]. This study showed a clear distinction between weedy rice and cultivated rice, in which the former contains higher levels of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), α-glucose, fumaric acid, and phenylalanine. Interestingly, the study also found that the metabolite profiles of weedy rice from the east coast region are different from those of the west coast area of Peninsular Malaysia, which could be influenced by genotype and environmental conditions.

5. Omics Study as Knowledge-Based Weed Management Strategies for the Future

Various omics approaches, including genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, have emerged as attractive approaches in plant science. The principal of an omics study is aimed at comprehensively profiling and characterizing a biological system to interpret and understand its function or mechanism [84]. Rapid data generation through the advancement of high-throughput platforms, e.g., next-generation DNA sequencing, SNP-chip profiling, and state-of-the-art analytical instruments, such as liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, has accelerated these omics studies. Each layer of these omics studies offers a wealth of knowledge and information that can provide a better understanding of the functions and mechanisms of biological systems (Figure 2) [85,86].
The applications of omics study in plant science and agriculturally important crops, including rice, have increased over the years [85]. In weed science, genomics study is frequently employed, but other omics areas, such as transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, have also been explored in recent years. The omics approach could assist researchers in understanding weedy traits as well as the mechanisms of herbicide resistance, adaptation to stress environments, and crop–weed interactions [85,87].
In weedy rice studies, genomic research has been extensively investigated (Table 3). The genetic studies of weedy rice were conducted through a simple sequence repeats (SSR) marker or microsatellite to identify the quantitative traits locus (QTL), DNA sequencing, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and genome-wide association study (GWAS) [88,89,90]. Genomic studies in weedy rice also focused on herbicide-resistance traits, including target site resistance and non-target site resistance, using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) to identify candidate genes involved in ALS-inhibitor [91]. Transcriptomic and proteomic studies of weedy rice were concentrated on abiotic (cold, drought, temperature, and nutrients) and biotic (pathogen) stresses [92,93,94,95,96]. A metabolomics study was applied to uncover different metabolite profiles between cultivated and weedy rice, as well as weedy rice samples, from different geographical areas [82].
Compared to cultivated rice, omics studies in weedy rice are still limited. Therefore, the application of omics technology in weedy rice is important to improve knowledge-based weed management strategies in the future.
Table 3. Application of omics study in weedy rice.
Table 3. Application of omics study in weedy rice.
Omics StudyField of ResearchReferences
GenomicsEvolution: origin, genetic variation, adaptation[6,11,18,74,89,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105]
GenomicsPhenotypic variation[106]
GenomicsHerbicide resistance[53]
GenomicsAnthocyanin nutrition[107]
GenomicsAbiotic stress: temperature[108]
TranscriptomicsEvolution: origin, genetic variation, adaptation[109]
TranscriptomicsPhenotypic variation, hormone level[110]
TranscriptomicsAbiotic stress: cold stress[65,94,111,112]
TranscriptomicsAbiotic stress: drought[113,114]
TranscriptomicsAbiotic: nutrient stress[95]
TranscriptomicsAbiotic stress: temperature[93]
ProteomicsAbiotic stress: drought[114]
ProteomicsBiotic stress: insects[92]
MetabolomicsChemical profiles: accession, geographical origin[82]

6. Genomics Aspect of Weedy Rice

As an intermediate conspecific weedy rice, their unique characteristics, such as competitive ability, adaptive evolution to stress tolerance, increased seed dispersal, seed dormancy, and variation in morphology, are the key factors in exploring its genetic background and chemical compositions [93,115]. Identifying important genes with the chemical compounds of weedy rice may provide additional features for crop improvements. Table 4 summarizes several important genes in weedy rice associated with important morphological traits and their tolerance to abiotic and biotic stress conditions.
Seed shattering is one of the important characteristics in the evolution of weedy rice. For instance, sh4 is a functional gene that controls seed shattering and is driven by spatiotemporal promoter pSH4 [116]. Studies showed that sh4 is linked with higher seed dormancy (DOG1, Sdr4, qSD7-1 genes) and the variant of germination time (CYP707A, NCED genes) [117,118]. These activities involved abscisic acid (ABA) signaling at the various growth stages of weedy rice, which is promoted under hypoxic conditions [119]. Such a mechanism ensures effective seed dissemination, paving the way for persistent soil seed bank development and sustainability over multiple seasons.
The red pericarp is the most distinct trait that differentiates between weedy rice and cultivated rice. Rc is the regulatory gene responsible for seed pigmentation, in which red pigments are produced by activating the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway in the pericarp tissue’s lower epidermal cell layer [107,120,121]. The association of qSD7-1/Rc (seed dormancy/red pericarp) developed pleiotropic effects in some variations of germination events by enhancing the ABA biosynthesis [120].
Nonetheless, the function of the pigmented hull is still vague. The black hull color can be originated from the aus crop [122] and/or from other wild rice species [123]. Meanwhile, Bh4 was documented for black pigmentation and encoding an amino acid transporter, whereas
Table 4. Important genes linked to morphological traits with response to abiotic and biotic stresses.
Table 4. Important genes linked to morphological traits with response to abiotic and biotic stresses.
Gene (s)Important Morphological Traits with Response to Abiotic and Biotic StressReferences
sh4, qSH1Seed shattering[116,124,125]
RcPigmented pericarp[54,74,107]
Bh4, Phr1Hull color (black)[119,122]
An-1, LABA1Awn length and awn barb[126,127]
Sdr4, DOG1, qSD7-1,
CYP707A, NCED
Dormancy and germination[51,128]
sd-1Plant height[89,129]
Prog1Erect leave and erect panicles[89,99,130]
OsLG1Closed panicle[99,131]
Hd1Early flowering[132]
AtCYP78A7Drought tolerance[113]
HKT, NHX1, SOS1Salinity stress[115,133]
RAB16, OVP1, APX1Cold tolerance[111]
HSF2a, HSFA7Heat tolerance[134]
ADH, PDC, OsB12D1Flooding tolerance[135]
AHAS, ALS, EPSPHerbicide resistance
(imazapic–imazapyr, glyphosate)
[35,136]
Pi-taBlast resistant
(Magnaporthe oryza B.)
[137]
Phr1 encodes polyphenol oxidase that is only accumulated in ripened hulls [121,122]. Phr1 has been reportedly associated with long-term grain storage, which improves seed dormancy [9]. The evolution from a black hull color into a straw hull color in weedy rice involved different loss-of-function alleles, a 22-bp frameshift deletion in exon 3, about 4% carrying a 1-bp frameshift deletion in exon 1 [138]. The black hull color significantly correlated with high seed shattering, while the straw hull color was associated with non-shattering seeds. The brown hull color indicated hybridization between the black and straw hull weedy rice [122]. The hull color variation represented multiple rice domestication and de-domestication occurrences in weedy rice.
Awn length denotes the strategy to increase seed dispersion in weedy rice. The awn protects seeds from bird and mammal predation, aiding in seed dispersal by clinging to animal fur and enabling self-planting. The upregulation of An-1 and LABA1 corresponds to Histone H1 expression, which may directly or indirectly promote cell division for awn length [126]. Furthermore, An-1/LABA1 on chromosome 4 downregulates meristematic activity by reducing OSH1 and cytokinin levels, which are responsible for reducing the grain number per panicle [126,127]. The awn trait is generally related to seed dispersal, seed shattering, dormancy, and adaptation in stress conditions [45,58,139].
To escape being eliminated, the plant architecture of weedy rice has evolved under natural conditions and mimicked cultivated rice, such as from taller to shorter plants with erect leaves (PROG1 gene), pigmented hull to straw hull color, non-shattering (qSH1 gene), and open to closed panicles (OsLG1 gene). Closed panicles have more seeds than open panicles and can retain maturity longer than open panicles. Long awns with closed panicles have also changed seed-shedding and pollinating behaviors [131]. These genes were targeted for selection in the early stages of rice domestication, and they have similar haplotypes with weedy rice at these loci [9].
The variation in flowering helps weedy rice improve its adaptation to different environments. For instance, differences in the Hd1 protein, Hd3a promoters, and Ehd1 expression contribute to the variation in flowering time [140]. Mutations in hd1 during rice domestication affected the insensitivity of the photoperiod in tropical and subtropical areas, which benefited the reproduction of weedy rice [132].
Through multiple de-domestications, weedy rice carries valuable genetic resources, with several varietal-specific improvement genes, under abiotic conditions (drought, flooding, cold, heat, and salinity), biotic stress-tolerant (diseases), and herbicide-resistance [58,141]. Evidently, the overexpression of certain genes during stress conditions stimulates stress-responsive pathways (sucrose, metabolism, antioxidant defenses). For example, these include the overexpression of the AtCYP78A7 gene during drought [113], HKT, NHX1, and SOS1 genes in terms of tolerance to salinity [133], HSF2a and HSFA7 genes under heat stress [134] and ADH, PDC, and OsB12D1 genes during flooding [135].
Rice blast is one of the main diseases in cultivated rice. Weedy rice survival in blast disease is a potential resource for the novel blast R gene for resistance breeding. The pi-ta gene was found to successfully control rice blast disease caused by Magnaporthe oryzae [137,142]. R genes produce a cytoplasmic protein with a nucleotide-binding domain leucine-rich repeat (NLR), indicating their functions as receptors and/or in protein–protein interaction [137]. As documented by Lee et al. [142], the resistant Pi-ta allele is mostly found in the awnless straw hull of weedy rice.
The application of herbicides for a long period has had a negative impact on weed management. The gene flow occurrence between cultivated and weedy rice was revealed through the mutation of EPSP (5-enilpyruvoylshikimate-3-phospate) for resistance to glyphosate, ALS (acetolactate synthase), and AHAS (acetohydroxyacid synthase) for IMI resistance [35,136,143]. The gene flow between cultivated and weedy rice results in hybrids by selection, as they are primarily self-fertilizing. In the future decade, the weedy rice genome will be reshaped by the widespread selection for crop introgression.
The availability of rice reference genomes and well-characterized genes relevant to domestication provides an effective platform to investigate the genetic mechanisms underlying weedy rice evolution. However, research into the genes related to weediness functional identification is still far behind that of cultivated rice. Recent comparative genomics studies have encouraged the understanding of the development of weediness traits in weedy rice. Therefore, further investigations into the molecular mechanism of weediness candidate genes would be useful in understanding the adaptation, diversity, and evolution of weedy rice.
The first genomic-associated study of Malaysian weedy rice was conducted via random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), and this study revealed that the weedy rice origin was distinct from wild rice [20]. Next, through simple sequence repeats (SSR) analysis, weedy rice was shaped by contributions of genetic materials from local wild rice Oryza rufipogon populations at sh4 and Bh4 domestication genes [16]. Therefore, to gain insights into various biological aspects to understand the entire genetic makeup and cellular processes of weedy rice, omics technology could provide a better option. Omics study may also bridge the gap in information on the functional identification of weediness-related genes.

7. The Potential Use of Metabolomics in Weedy Rice Study

Metabolites are chemical phenotypes that serve as the products of biological processes for plant growth, development, and adaptation toward biotic and abiotic changes [12,144,145]. Metabolomics is a branch of omics disciplines investigating the dynamics, compositions, and interactions of metabolites with internal and external environments [146]. It aims to understand biological responses in organisms involving the identification and quantification of metabolites and chemical footprints of cellular regulatory processes [147,148]. Metabolomics plays an important role in elucidating the metabolic pathways and processes, understanding plant interaction with biotic or abiotic factors, identifying biomarkers, and relating those specific compounds to growth, disease, stress, and environmental changes to investigate the functions of unknown genes and mutant characterization in plants, as well as for quality control of plants and crops [85,149,150].
There are already quite a number of papers published on rice research employing the metabolomics approach, such as in exploring chemical diversity in rice varieties [150,151], understanding crop responses to oxidative stress [152], salinity tolerance studies [115], and rice–pathogen interactions [153]. Table 5 summarizes comprehensive studies on rice metabolomics from 2009 to 2021. In general, metabolite compositions in rice vary according to varying rice cultivars and environmental influences [154,155,156].
Weedy rice, as a conspecific weed in the rice agroecosystem, has morphological similarities with wild rice and, at the same time, shares the primary gene pool with cultivated rice [7,55]. Exploring the metabolomics of weedy rice can enhance our understanding of the adaptation mechanism of the weed in nature, which may be useful if these characteristics can be utilized for the enhancement of current rice cultivars. This holds true for other important traits that are potentially useful for rice breeding programs [137,157,158,159]. For example, various studies have reported that weedy rice has developed tolerance to extreme abiotic stresses, such as drought, high salinity, and low and high temperature [93,112,114,115]. Rice breeders may turn directly to weedy rice because this conspecific counterpart of rice may provide additional features for crop improvement. Selection from weedy rice strains as one of the parents rather than using a wild rice progenitor is very helpful in terms of recovering some genetic diversity that has been removed during the domestication process [55].
Seed dormancy is one of the important adaptive traits of weedy rice. In general, weedy rice has much stronger seed dormancy than cultivated rice [55]. Rapid and uniform seed germination has been selected in crops, but a moderate degree of dormancy is desirable for rice to resist preharvest sprouting. Reducing the degree of seed dormancy could promote germination uniformity and make weeds relatively easy to eliminate by agronomic practices or mitigate the risk of transgene flow into wild/weed relatives [117,160]. Thus, understanding the metabolism and complex network of genes and metabolites during the seed dormancy and germination stages could be realized by integrating metabolomic and transcriptomic approaches.
Table 5. Metabolomics studies on rice from 2009 to 2021.
Table 5. Metabolomics studies on rice from 2009 to 2021.
Organ
Parts
CategoryExperimental
Methodology
Metabolomics Acquisition
Methods
Bioinformatics
Tools
Statistical AnalysisFindingsSource of
Samples
References
GrainsNatural
variation
FieldLC-MS, GC-MSR, SIMCA-P, Cytoscape, MeV, MetATTPCA, Heatmap, LASSO, Metabolic pathway, Two-way ANOVA, ASCA, Pearson correlationJaponica and indica subspecies were significantly different in relative abundances of metabolites and metabolic association networks.China[151]
GrainsNatural
variation
LaboratorySPME-GC-MS, NMR, LC-ESI-MS, GC-TOF-MSMetAlign, AMIX,
SIMCA-P, TagFinder
PCA, PLS-DA, HCACultivars of jasmine and basmati showed
different metabolic profiles. Storage grains had a significant effect on the metabolome in both cultivars.
Iran, Pakistan, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Philipines, Cambodia, Australia, Japan[154]
GrainsNatural
variation
LaboratoryNMRChenomx, SIMCA-P,
SPSS
PCA, PLS-DA, ANOVA, Tukey’sThe PLS model demonstrated that α-linolenic acid, ϒ-oryzanol, α-tocopherol, ϒ-aminobutyric acid, 3-hydroxybutyric acid, fumaric acid, fatty acids, threonine, tryptophan, and vanillic acid were significantly correlated with black germinated rice.Thailand[155]
GrainsNatural
variation
GreenhouseGC-MSMetaMiner, AMDIS, PageMan, MapMant-test, HCA, Heatmap, metabolic pathwayIncrement in hexose phosphates, tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates, and ϒ-aminobutyric acid after one hour of water imbibition. Later enrichment in carbohydrate, amino acid, and cell wall metabolism.None[161]
GrainsNatural
variation
FieldHPLCChrompare, XLSTATPCA, HCASignificant differences in the contents of the anthocyanins, cyanidin-3-glucoside and peonidin-3- glucoside of red, black and non-colored indica and japonica rice subspecies.China[162]
GrainsNatural
variation
Field, genebankLC-MS, NMRNoneNoneHyperin, isoquercitrin, quercetin, gentiobioside were isolated from the grains of sugary rice.Korea[163]
GrainsNatural
variation
Field, genebankHPLCStatistix 8.0ANOVABrown and white rice contained lower quantities of phytochemicals compared to black and red rice. France[164]
GrainsNatural
variation
Field, genebankLC-MS, GC-MSChroma TOF, MassLynx, MetAlign, SIMCA-P, MeV, Statistica 18PCA, PLS-DA, box-whisker, ANOVA, Duncan’s test, Pearson’s correlationsAntioxidant compounds (cyanidin-3-glucoside, peonidin-3-glucoside,
proanthocyanidin dimers, proanthocyanidin trimers, and catechin) mostly found in black and red rice seeds.
Korea[165]
GrainsNatural
variation
GreenhouseNMRMestrenovaOPLS-DAMetabolites of valine, threonine, alanine, glutamate, galactinol, β-glucose, α-glucose, raffinose, and fumaric acid influenced the separation of red rice and black rice.Indonesia[166]
GrainsNatural
variation
FieldLC-MS, GC-MSMeV, SIMCA-P, Cytoscape, SPSS, R PCA, Heatmap, ANOVA, Metabolic pathway, t-test, Pearson’s correlationThe chalky endosperm had lower levels of metabolites compared to the translucent upper part.China[167]
GrainsNatural
variation
Field, genebankGC-MSTraceFinderHeatmapIdentified 66 metabolites in the rice samples and cultivar Jaya showed the highest number of metabolites.India[168]
GrainsNatural
variation
Field, genebankHR-MAS NMRMATLAB, SIMCA-P,
SAS
PCA, OPLS-DA, ANOVA, t-testWaxy rice cultivars accumulated lipids and had high levels of glutamate, aspartate, asparagine, alanine, and sucrose compared to nonwaxy rice cultivars.Korea[169]
Cooked
grains
Natural
variation
LaboratoryLC-MSMarkerLynx, SIMCA-PPLS-DA, Kruskal-wallis testChemical diversity among the varieties clustered according to subspecies classifications: indica, japonica, and aus.Philippines[170]
Rice branNatural
variation
Field, genebankLC-MSMetabolon, SIMCA-PMetabolic pathway, PCAThe 71 rice bran compounds of significant variation by cultivar included 21 amino acids, 7 carbohydrates, 2 metabolites from cofactors and vitamins, 33 lipids, 6 nucleotides, and 2 secondary metabolites. Tryptophan, α-ketoglutarate, ϒ-tocopherol/β-tocopherol, and ϒ-tocotrienol were among the metabolites.Cambodia, India, Kenya, Mali, Nepal, Nicaragua and USA[156]
Grains and seedlingsNatural
variation
Field, growth
chamber
HPLCAnalyst 1.5Heatmap, metabolic pathway24 candidate genes were associated with various metabolic quantitative trait loci by data mining.China[171]
SeedlingsNatural
variation
LaboratoryGC-MSChemStation, XLSTATPCA, MANOVAThai black and purple rice contained higher levels of metabolites than the red and colorless samples.Thailand[172]
SeedlingsNatural
variation
LaboratoryGS-MS, LC-MSSIMCA-P,
SPSS
PCA, PLS-DA, metabolic pathway25 metabolites, including acidic compounds, amino acids, sugars, lipids, and secondary metabolites were identified as the components that contributed to the
variations in the germinated brown rice group.
Korea[173]
SeedlingsNatural
variation
LaboratoryLC-ESI-MSROPLS-DAPhenylpropanoid biosynthesis and glutathione metabolism were continuously enriched during the seed germination and young seedling growth stages.China[174]
LeavesAbiotic stress
(Plant–drought–flood)
FieldLC-MSXCMS, Msconverter, Excel, SIMCA-P, R, SPSSPCA, PLS-DA, OPLS-DA, t-test, Heatmap, Euclidean distance, ANOVA102 different metabolites were identified from the rice spike between T1 (abrupt drought–flood alternation) and control treatment, 104 different metabolites were identified between T1 and CK1 (drought) treatment, and 116 different metabolites were identified between T1 and CK2 (flood) treatment.China[96]
LeavesAbiotic stress
(Plant–drought,
heat)
FieldLCMSR, ggplot2PCA, Venn diagram,
heatmap
Decrement of some metabolites in stressed plants at specific development stages and organs: glycerophosphoglycerol, isocitric acid, ribitol, A116014 (Flag leaves/flowering), A214004, dehydroascorbic acid, dimer, glyceric acid, glycine, malic acid, phosphoric acid (flag leaves/early grain-filling), A147011, A180002, arbutin, aspartic acid, erythronic acid, galactonic acid, phosphoric acid (flowering spikelets).Philippines[158]
LeavesAbiotic Stress
(Plant–flood)
GreenhouseGC-MS, NMRAMDIS, MarkerLynx
XS, MestReNova, Topspin, Minitab 15, SPSS
PCA, t-testMetabolites of S-methyl methionine and the dipeptide alanylglycine were only detected by ¹H NMR.USA[175,176]
LeavesNatural
variation
ChamberGS-MS, LC-MSVx Capture, MassLynx DataBridge, MetAlign, SIMCA-P, STATISTICA, CytoscapePCA, PLS-DA, OPLS-DA, Heatmap, ANOVA, Pearson’s correlation, metabolic pathwayAntioxidant activities of rice leaves were high in blue, white, and green light, followed by red and shade light of LED.Korea[177]
LeavesAbiotic stress
(Plant–drought)
ChamberGC-MSChroma TOF, RPCA, HCA, Heatmap
Pearson correlation
Metabolite levels were mainly negatively correlated with performance parameters under drought stress.Philippines,
Vietnam
[178]
LeavesBiotic Stress
(Plant–insect)
GreenhouseNMRChenomx, SIMCA-P,
SPSS
PCA, Tukey’s test,
ANOVA
The concentration of 10 metabolites was significantly altered between the infestation by planthopper and the control groups. Thailand[179]
LeavesAbiotic stress
(Plant–cold)
GreenhouseGC-MS, CE-MS,
LC-MS
NonePCA, Heatmap, PathwayThe accumulation of glucose, fructose, and sucrose involved in starch degradation, sucrose metabolism, and the glyoxylate cycle were upregulated in rice plants exposed to cold or dehydration. Japan[180]
LeavesBiotic Stress
(Plant–insect)
GreenhouseGC-MS, LC-MSXCMS, AMDIS, PeakView, MArkView, MetaboAnalyst, MetPA, SPSSPCA, t-test, metabolic pathway, ANOVAAlteration of metabolites in pathway analysis in both resistant cultivars compared to the control. Cyanoamino acids and lipid metabolism were induced in IR36, while changes in thiamine, taurine and hypotaurine metabolism in IR56.Philippines[181]
Leaves and
roots
Abiotic stress
(Plant–salinity)
GreenhouseGC-MSSAS, RHeatmap, HCA, ANOVASugars and amino acids increased significantly in the leaves and roots of both genotypes under salt stress, while organic acids increased in roots and decreased in leaves.None[182]
Leaves and
roots
Abiotic Stress
(Plant–drought)
GreenhouseGC-MSChroma TOF, RPCA, Two-way
ANOVA, t-test
Higher accumulation of N-rich metabolites in shoots of the tolerant varieties, whereas in roots, the aus-type varieties showed a reduction in metabolites representative of glycolysis and the TCA cycle.Philippines[183]
RootsAbiotic stress
(Plant–salinity)
ChamberNMRChenomx, MATLAB,
MathWorks, SIMCA-P
PCA, PLS-DA, OPLS-DASalt-responsive metabolic markers of rice roots were identified, sucrose, allantoin and glutamate, whereas the levels of glutamine and alanine decreased.Korea[115]
RootsBiotic Stress
(Plant–fungus)
CulturesGC-MSAMDIS,
SIMCA-P
PCA, OPLS-DA,
Heatmap
Levels of metabolites of the shikimate and lignin
biosynthesis pathways increased in the M. oryzae-challenged rice roots (Mo-roots) and reduced in H. oryzae-challenged rice roots (Ho-roots). Control showed a reduction in sucrose and maltose in both Ho-roots and Mo-roots.
China[184]
Weedy rice is also known as red rice due to the red pigmentation on the pericarp. The pericarp of weedy rice seeds had much greater quantities of anthocyanin, beneficial trace elements (Ca, Fe, Zn, and Se), free amino acids, and unsaturated fatty acids than cultivated rice [107]. These nutritional values of weedy rice can be of great interest for the development of nutritious and high antioxidant content rice. Metabolomics study can be applied to chemically profile and screen the high nutritional line of weedy rice. Moreover, pericarp pigmentation could conceivably provide camouflage for weed seeds in crop fields or protection from biotic and abiotic stresses [74].
Weedy rice has a high adaptability to environmental stresses, which enables it to survive in harsh conditions. Weedy rice has been reported to have higher tolerance to salinity, flooding, drought, heat, and cold temperatures compared with the commercial rice varieties [111,113,133,134,135]. Resistance traits of weedy rice toward rice diseases (e.g., rice blast, bacterial leaf blight, panicle blight) [137] could be due to the production of phytoalexins, a group of metabolites produced upon disease infection as a defense mechanism. Thus, it can be an effective option to elucidate the valuable chemicals and screen the beneficial specific genes controlling important metabolites to be incorporated into rice cultivars to produce new disease-resistant rice varieties or higher tolerance toward abiotic stresses such as drought and salinity.

8. Study of Weedy Rice in Malaysia: Where Do We Go?

In addition to the application of a single omics platform, the incorporation of multi-omics studies could dive into insights and provide a deeper understanding of the molecular and physiological mechanisms of the targeted organisms [85]. Single large-scale omics studies described previously have accumulated data in various organelles, cells, tissues, and organs. While these omics data are becoming more accessible and cost-friendly, scientists are now leveraging more comprehensive multi-omics studies integrating the various omics layers, which have promise in bridging the relationship between these different omics and their phenotypes.
Combining two or more omics approaches, e.g., metabolomics with genomics, transcriptomics, or proteomics, has been shown to provide an understanding of the molecular phenotype by providing a holistic view into the mechanisms controlling cellular processes, molecular functions, and interactions. Metabolomics studies are particularly important in multi-omics studies due to their closeness to phenotype and, therefore, have been selected as the ‘common denominator’ to guide many study designs [185].
In rice, integrated metabolomics and transcriptomics approaches have been used in landraces and cultivated rice [186] and studies in rice under different stress conditions [187,188,189] in which the metabolome and transcriptome profiles have shed light into their molecular mechanism, metabolite–gene correlation networks and prediction of diverse biosynthetic pathways. The outcome of such studies can help in the understanding of rice metabolism and how it responds to various environmental stimuli. Similarly, proteomics and metabolomics integration studies have been performed in rice [190,191], providing a protein–metabolite interaction network.
Despite the immense importance and potential outcome of multi-omics research, the application of this study in weedy rice is yet to gain momentum. The issues with multi-omics data integration remain a challenge that hinders the progress of multi-omics research. However, one notable study has emerged recently in which Zhang et al. [192] incorporated transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics analysis studies that describe the metabolism of hypoxic germination tolerance in weedy rice embryos. It is hopeful that in the future, the outcome of multi-omics research studies will be able to shed light on plant metabolism, and the integration of various molecular-level data can provide a systems biology view of metabolism, especially the pathways and networks in weedy rice.
The rise in deep learning (DL), a subfield of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI), marks a significant advancement in the automation of precision agriculture [193]. These AI tools have the potential to effectively differentiate weedy rice from cultivated rice, addressing a critical challenge in crop management. Ancillary technologies, such as the Internet of Things (IoT), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), field robots, and AI-enhanced herbicides, further augment AI’s capabilities, providing holistic and data-driven approaches to weed control [194]. For example, a computer vision and meta-heuristic hybrid NNICA classifier has demonstrated high accuracy in distinguishing between different weed varieties and rice plants under both natural light (NLC) and controlled light conditions (CLC) [195]. Leveraging AI in weedy rice management holds great promise for the future, potentially transforming agricultural practices and improving crop yields.

9. Conclusions

The research on weedy rice in Malaysia has revealed its complex dynamics and significant impact on rice agriculture. The morphological, physiological, and genetic diversity of weedy rice has been documented, especially in its superior adaptability and its ability to mimic cultivated rice. Moreover, genetic analyses have traced the origins of Malaysian weedy rice to both local cultivars and wild rice populations, demonstrating the intricate evolutionary pathways and hybridization events that have shaped its current form. This understanding underscores the need for continuous monitoring and advanced management strategies to mitigate weedy rice infestations.
The application of omics technologies offers promising avenues for enhancing our understanding and management of weedy rice. Genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic studies have begun to uncover the molecular mechanisms behind the traits that make weedy rice a formidable competitor. These studies not only provide insights into weedy rice’s stress tolerance, seed dormancy, and adaptive evolution but also highlight potential genetic resources that could be harnessed for crop improvement. Furthermore, integrating multi-omics approaches will be crucial for a systems-level understanding of metabolism. The revolution of advanced omics technologies with artificial intelligence (AI) in weedy rice studies is hoped to accelerate the development of effective, knowledge-based weed management strategies and ensure the sustainability of rice agriculture in Malaysia.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.F.M., M.S.M. and M.Z.S.; formal analysis, I.F.M., M.S.M. and M.Z.S.; data curation, I.F.M., M.S.M. and M.Z.S.; writing—original draft preparation, I.F.M.; writing—review and editing, I.F.M., S.N.S.B., M.S.M., F.S., Z.M. and M.Z.S.; supervision, M.S.M. and M.Z.S.; project administration, M.S.M., F.S. and M.Z.S.; funding acquisition, M.S.M., F.S., Z.M. and M.Z.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS), Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (Grant no. FRGS/1/2019/STG03/UM/02/17).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Anuar, N.S.; Mazlan, N.; Ariff, E.E.; Juraimi, A.S.; Yusop, M.R. A comparative study of vegetative and reproductive growth of local weedy and Clearfield® rice varieties in Malaysia. ISSAAS J. 2014, 20, 41–51. [Google Scholar]
  2. Baki, B.B.; Shakirin, M.M. Spatio-temporal distribution pattern of new biotypes of weedy rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Selangor north-west project, Malaysia. Korean J. Weed Sci. 2010, 30, 68–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Azmi, M.; Karim, S.M.R. Weedy Rice-Biology, Ecology and Management; Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI): Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rathore, M.; Singh, R.; Kumar, B.; Chauhan, B.S. Characterization of functional traits diversity among Indian cultivated and weedy rice populations. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mispan, M.S.; Bzoor, M.; Mahmod, I.F.; MD-Akhir, A.H.; Zulrushdi, A. Managing weedy rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Malaysia: Challenges and ways forward. J. Res. Weed Sci. 2019, 2, 149–167. [Google Scholar]
  6. Neik, T.X.; Chai, J.Y.; Tan, S.Y.; Sudo, M.P.S.; Cui, Y.; Jayaraj, J.; Teo, S.S.; Olsen, K.M.; Song, B.K. When west meets east: The origins and spread of weedy rice between continental and island Southeast Asia. G3 2019, 9, 2941–2950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sudianto, E.; Neik, T.X.; Tam, S.M.; Chuah, T.S.; Idris, A.A.; Olsen, K.M.; Song, B.K. Morphology of Malaysian weedy rice (Oryza sativa): Diversity, origin and implications for weed management. Weed Sci. 2016, 64, 501–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mohd Hanafiah, N.; Cheng, A.; Lim, P.E.; Sethuraman, G.; Mohd Zain, N.A.; Baisakh, N.; Mispan, M.S. Novel PCR-Based Multiplex Assays for Detecting Major Quality and Biotic Stress in Commercial and Weedy Rice. Life 2022, 12, 1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Li, L.F.; Olsen, K.M. Population genomics of weedy crop relatives: Insights from weedy rice. In Population Genomics; Rajora, O.P., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  10. Shrestha, S.; Stallworth, S.; Tseng, T.M. Weedy rice: Competitive ability, evolution, and diversity. In Integrated view of Population Genetics; Rafael, T.M., Magnolia, A.C., Eds.; Intech Open: London, UK, 2018; pp. 27–40. [Google Scholar]
  11. De Leon, T.B.; Karn, E.; Al-Khatib, K.; Espino, L.; Blank, T.; Andaya, C.B.; Andaya, V.C.; Brim-DeForest, W. Genetic variation and possible origins of weedy rice found in California. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 9, 5835–5848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Vigueira, P.A.; Olsen, K.M.; Wagner, C.R.; Chittick, Z.B.; Vigueira, C.C. Weedy rice from South Korea arose from two distinct de-domestication events. Front. Agron. 2020, 2, 602612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Choi, J.Y.; Platts, A.E.; Fuller, D.Q.; Wing, R.A.; Purugganan, M.D. The rice paradox: Multiple origins but single domestication in Asian rice. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 969–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kim, H.; Jung, J.; Singh, N.; Greenberg, A.; Doyle, J.J.; Tyagi, W.; Chung, J.W.; Kimball, J.; Hamilton, R.S.; McCouch, S.R. Population dynamics among six major groups of the Oryza rufipogon species complex, wild relative of cultivated Asian rice. Rice 2016, 9, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Song, Z.; Zhu, W.; Rong, J.; Xu, X.; Chen, J.; Lu, B.R. Evidences of introgression from cultivated rice to Oryza rufipogon (Poaceae) populations based on SSR fingerprinting: Implications for wild rice differentiation and conservation. Evol. Ecol. 2016, 20, 501–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Song, B.K.; Chuah, T.S.; Tam, S.M.; Olsen, K.M. Malaysian weedy rice shows its true stripes: Wild Oryza and elite rice cultivars shape agricultural weed evolution in Southeast Asia. Mol. Ecol. 2014, 23, 5003–5017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Londo, J.P.; Schaal, B.A. Origins and population genetics of weedy red rice in the USA. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16, 4523–4535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhang, L.; Dai, W.; Wu, C.; Song, X.; Qiang, S. Genetic diversity and origin of Japonica- and Indica-like rice biotypes of weedy rice in the Guangdong and Liaoning provinces of China. Gen. Res. Crop Evol. 2012, 59, 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kanapeckas, K.L.; Vigueira, C.C.; Ortiz, A.; Gettler, K.A.; Burgos, N.R.; Fischer, A.J.; Lawton-Rauh, A.L. Escape to ferality: The endoferal origin of weedy rice from crop rice through de-domestication. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0162676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Abdullah, M.Z.; Watanabe, H.; Vaughan, D.A.; Okuno, K. Padi angin: Its probable origin and diversity revealed through DNA polymorphism. In Proceedings of the 1st National Congress on Genetics, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 7–8 November 1994; pp. 164–167. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wahab, A.H.; Suhaimi, O. Padi angin: Characteristics, adverse effects and methods of its eradication. Teknol. Padi 1991, 8, 21–31. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mohammed Zuki, I.; Kamarudin, D. Status and control of padi angin in the Muda area. In Padi Angin Workshop; Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI): Penang, Malaysia, 1994; p. 12. [Google Scholar]
  23. Azmi, M.; Abdullah, M.Z.; Mislamah, B.; Baki, B.B. Management of weedy rice (Oryza sativa L.): The Malaysian experience. In Wild and Weedy Rice in Rice Ecosystems in Asia—A Review; Baki, B.B., Chin, D.V., Mortimer, M., Eds.; IRRI: Manila, Philippines, 2000; pp. 25–34. [Google Scholar]
  24. Karim, R.S.M.; Zainal, M.; Mansor, M.; Azmi, M. Weedy rice: A cancerous threat for rice growers in Malaysia. In Proceedings of the National Rice Conference, Perak, Malaysia, 28–30 June 2010; Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI): Serdang, Malaysia, 2010; pp. 327–329. [Google Scholar]
  25. Baki, B.B.; Bakar, M.A.; Man, A.B. Weedy rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Peninsular Malaysia. In Wild and Weedy Rice in Rice Ecosystems in Asia—A Review; Baki, B.B., Chin, D.V., Mortimer, M., Eds.; IRRI: Manila, Philippines, 2000; pp. 25–34. [Google Scholar]
  26. Baki, B.B. Invasive weed species in Malaysia: Species, impacts and management. Malays. J. Sci. 2004, 23, 1–42. [Google Scholar]
  27. Azmi, M.; Chin, D.V.; Vongsaroj, P.; Johnson, D.E. Emerging issues in weed management of direct-seeded rice in Malaysia, Vietnam, and Thailand. In Rice Is Life: Scientific Perspectives for the 21st Century; International Rice Research Institute: Los Baños, Philippines, 2005; pp. 196–198. [Google Scholar]
  28. Azmi, M.; Baki, B.B. Weed flora landscapes of the MUDA rice granary in the new millennium: A descriptive analysis. J. Tropic. Agric. Food Sci. 2007, 35, 319–331. [Google Scholar]
  29. Azmi, M.; Muhamad, H.; Johnson, D.E. Impact of Weedy Rice Infestation on Rice Yield and Influence of Crop Establishment Technique. In Proceedings of the 20th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 7–11 November 2005. [Google Scholar]
  30. Karim, R.S.M.; Azmi, M.; Ismail, S. Weed problems and their management in rice fields of Malaysia: An overview. Weed Biol. Manag. 2004, 4, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chauhan, B.S. Strategies to manage weedy rice in Asia. Crop Prot. 2013, 48, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kadir, A.; Kamariah, O. Bridging the technology gap through effective expansion programs. In Proceedings of the International Rice Conference, Alor Setar, Malaysia, 13–16 October 2003; pp. 208–216. [Google Scholar]
  33. San Sudo, M.P.; Yesudasan, R.; Neik, T.X.; Masilamany, D.; Jayaraj, J.; Teo, S.S.; Rahman, S.; Song, B.K. The details are in the genome-wide SNPs: Fine scale evolution of the Malaysian weedy rice. Plant Sci. 2021, 310, 110985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Olajumoke, B.; Juraimi, A.S.; Uddin, M.; Husni, M.H.; Alam, M. Competitive ability of cultivated rice against weedy rice biotypes: A review. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2016, 76, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ruzmi, R.; Ahmad-Hamdani, M.S.; Abidin, M.Z.Z.; Roma-Burgos, N. Evolution of imidazolinone-resistant weedy rice in Malaysia: The current status. Weed Sci. 2021, 69, 598–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mispan, M.S.; Jalaluddin, A.; Majrashi, A.A.; Baki, B.B. Weed Science in Malaysia: An Analysis. In Weed Science in the Asian Pacific Region; Rao, V.S., Yaduraju, N.T., Chandrasena, N.R., Hassan, G., Sharma, A.R., Eds.; Indian Society of Weed Science: Jabalpur, India, 2015; pp. 197–212. [Google Scholar]
  37. Azmi, M.; Azlan, S.; Yim, K.M.; George, T.V.; Chew, S.E. Control of weedy rice in direct seeded rice using the Clearfield® production system in Malaysia. Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res. 2012, 18, 49–53. [Google Scholar]
  38. Bzour, M.I.; Zuki, F.M.; Mispan, M.S. Introduction of imidazolinone herbicide and Clearfield rice between weedy rice—Control efficiency and environmental concerns. Environ. Rev. 2018, 26, 181–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dilipkumar, M.; Burgos, N.R.; Chuah, T.S.; Ismail, S. Cross-resistance to imazapic and imazapyr in a weedy rice (Oryza sativa) biotype found in Malaysia. Planta Daninha 2018, 36, e018182239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dilipkumar, M.; Ahmad-Hamdani, M.S.; Rahim, H.; Chuah, T.S.; Burgos, N.R. Survey on weedy rice (Oryza spp.) management practice and adoption of Clearfield® rice technology in Peninsular Malaysia. Weed Sci. 2021, 69, 558–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wedger, M.J.; Roma-Burgos, N.; Olsen, K.M. Genomic revolution of US weedy rice in response to 21st century agricultural technologies. Commun. Biol. 2022, 5, 885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mahmod, I.F.; Saiman, M.Z.; Mohamed, Z.; Ishak, M.N.; Mispan, M.S. Morphological variation, distribution and relationship of weedy rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Peninsular Malaysia. Weed Biol. Manag. 2021, 21, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zainuddin, H.; Azmi, M.; Othman, A.S. Morphological study of the relationships between weedy rice accessions (Oryza sativa complex) and commercial rice varieties in Penang’s rice granary area. Trop. Life Sci. Res. 2010, 21, 47–62. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ahmed, Q.N.; Roy, R.; Kamaruzaman, M.; Othman, A.S. Vegetative and reproductive growth of weedy rice in Selangor, Malaysia: A comparative study with commercial rice varieties. Malays. Appl. Biol. 2012, 41, 29–35. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ratnasekera, D. Weedy rice: A threat to rice production in Sri Lanka. J. Univ. Ruhuna 2015, 3, 2–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mahmod, I.F.; Barakbah, S.S.; Osman, N.; Omar, O. Physiological response of local rice varieties to aerobic condition. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2014, 16, 738–744. [Google Scholar]
  47. Stallworth, S.; Shrestha, S.; Schumaker, B.; Roma-Burgos, N.; Tseng, T.M. screening diverse weedy rice (Oryza sativa ssp.) mini germplasm for tolerance to heat and complete submergence stress during seedling stage. Front. Agron. 2021, 3, 642335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Svizzero, S. Agronomic practices and biotechnological methods dealing with the occurrence, dispersion, proliferation and adaptation of weedy rice (Oryza sativa f. spontanea). Int. J. Pest Manag. 2021, 70, 62–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xu, R.; Sun, C. What happened during domestication of wild to cultivated rice. Crop J. 2021, 9, 564–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Abraham, C.T.; Jose, N. Weedy rice invasion in rice fields of India and management options. J. Crop Weed. 2014, 10, 365–374. [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhang, Z.; Dai, W.; Song, X.; Qiang, S. A model of the relationship between weedy rice seed-bank dynamics and rice-crop infestation and damage in Jiangsu Province, China. Pest Manag. Sci. 2014, 70, 716–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gu, X.Y.; Kianian, S.F.; Foley, M.E. Seed dormancy imposed by covering tissues interrelates to shattering and seed morphological characteristics in weedy rice. Crop Sci. 2005, 45, 948–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Engku, A.K.; Norida, M.; Juraimi, A.S.; Rafii, M.Y.; Abdullah, S.N.A.; Alam, M.A. Gene flow from Clearfield® rice to weedy rice under field conditions. Plant Soil Environ. 2016, 62, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chen, L.J.; Lee, D.S.; Song, Z.P.; Suh, H.S.; Lu, B.R. Gene flow from cultivated rice (Oryza sativa) to its weedy and wild relatives. Ann. Bot. 2004, 93, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Mispan, M.S.; Zhang, L.; Feng, J.; Gu, X.Y. Quantitative trait locus and haplotype analyses of wild and crop-mimic traits in U.S. weedy rice. G3 2013, 3, 1049–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lu, B.R.; Yang, X.; Ellstrand, N.C. Fitness correlates of crop transgene flow into weedy populations: A case study of weedy rice in China and other examples. Evol. Appl. 2016, 9, 857–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Liu, Y.K.; Li, M.J.; Li, J.Y.; Li, X.J.; Yang, X.H.; Tong, Y.P.; Zhang, A.M.; Li, B.; Lin, J.X.; Kuang, T.Y.; et al. Dynamic changes in flag leaf angle contribute to high photosynthetic capacity. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2009, 54, 3045–3052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Fogliatto, S.; Ferrero, A.; Vidotto, F. How can weedy rice stand against abiotic stresses? A review. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chauhan, B.S.; Johnson, D.E. The role of seed ecology in improving weed management strategies in the tropics. Adv. Agron. 2010, 105, 221–262. [Google Scholar]
  60. Dass, A.; Shekhawat, K.; Choudhary, A.K.; Sepat, S.; Rathore, S.S.; Mahajan, G.; Chauhan, B.S. Weed management in rice using crop competition-a review. Crop Prot. 2017, 95, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hakim, M.A.; Juraimi, A.S.; Hanafi, M.M.; Ismail, M.R.; Selamat, A.; Rafii, M.Y.; Latif, M.A. Biochemical and anatomical changes and yield reduction in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under varied salinity regimes. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 1, 208584. [Google Scholar]
  62. Cheng, A.; Mohd Hanafiah, N.; Harikrishna, J.A.; Eem, L.P.; Baisakh, N.; Mispan, M.S. A Reappraisal of Polyploidy Events in Grasses (Poaceae) in a Rapidly Changing World. Biology 2022, 11, 636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Vaghefi, N.; Nasir Shamsudin, M.; Radam, A.; Rahim, K.A. Modelling the impact of climate change on rice production: An overview. J. Appl. Sci. 2013, 13, 5649–5660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ding, G.H.; Liu, X.L.; Ma, D.R.; Wang, X.X.; Yang, G.; Gao, M.C.; Gao, Q.; Sun, J.; Chen, W.F. Responses of weedy rice to drought stress at germination and seedling stages. In Applied Mechanics and Materials; Trans Tech Publications Ltd.: Bäch, Switzerland, 2013; Volume 316, pp. 451–459. [Google Scholar]
  65. Han, B.; Ma, X.; Cui, D.; Wang, Y.; Geng, L.; Cao, G.; Zhang, H.; Han, L. Comprehensive evaluation and analysis of the mechanism of cold tolerance based on the transcriptome of weedy rice seedlings. Rice 2020, 13, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Bzour, M.I.; Zuki, F.M.; Mispan, M.S. Evaluation of the emergence of imidazolinone resistant weedy rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Malaysia. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2020, 18, 7189–7199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Burgos, N.R.; Singh, V.; Tseng, T.M.; Black, H.; Young, N.D.; Huang, Z.; Hyma, K.E.; Gealy, D.R.; Caicedo, A.L. The impact of herbicide-resistant rice technology on phenotypic diversity and population structure of United States weedy rice. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 1208–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Dilipkumar, M.; Chuah, T.S.; Goh, S.S.; Sahid, I. Weed management issues, challenges, and opportunities in Malaysia. Crop Prot. 2020, 134, 104347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ruzmi, R.; Ahmad-Hamdani, M.S.; Bakar, B.B. Prevalence of herbicide-resistant weed species in Malaysian rice fields: A review. Weed Biol. Manag. 2017, 17, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zulrushdi, A.Q.; Rejab, N.A.; Mahmod, I.F.; Mohamed, Z.; Ishak, M.N.; Mispan, M.S. Seed morphological traits associated with weedy rice escaped from imazapic+ imazapyr herbicide treatment. Phytoparasitica 2022, 50, 1123–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Abdullah, M.Z.; Vaughan, A.D.; Watanabe, H.; Okuno, K. The origin of weedy rice in Peninsular Malaysia. MARDI Res. J. 1996, 24, 169–174. [Google Scholar]
  72. Hakim, M.A.; Juraimi, A.S.; Ismail, M.R.; Hanafi, M.M.; Selamat, A. Distribution of weed population in the costal rice growing area of Kedah in peninsular Malaysia. J. Agron. 2010, 9, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hussain, Z.; Man, A.; Othman, A.S. Association of commercial rice varieties with weedy rice accessions (Oryza sativa complex) in Pulau Pinang’s rice granary area. Trop. Life Sci. Res. 2011, 22, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  74. Cui, Y.; Song, B.K.; Li, L.F.; Huang, Z.; Caicedo, A.L.; Jia, Y.; Olsen, K.M. Little white lies: Pericarp color provides insights into the origins and evolution of southeast Asian weedy rice. G3 2016, 6, 4105–4114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ruzmi, R.; Ahmad-Hamdani, M.S.; Mazlan, N. Ser-653-Asn substitution in the acetohydroxyacid synthase gene confers resistance in weedy rice to imidazolinone herbicides in Malaysia. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0227397. [Google Scholar]
  76. Ahmed, Q.N.; Zainudin, H.; Othman, A.S. Morphological relationships between weedy rice morphotypes and commercial rice varieties in Perak, Malaysia. Int. J. Bio-Resour. Stress Manag. 2011, 2, 86–92. [Google Scholar]
  77. Hamid, Z.A.A.; Mansor, M.; Man, A. Life cycle and morphological characteristics of weedy rice (Oryza sativa complex, locally called padi angin), a noxious weed of ricefields in Malaysia. J. Biosains 2007, 18, 55–79. [Google Scholar]
  78. Puteh, A.B.; Rosli, R.; Mohamad, R.B. Dormancy and cardinal temperatures during seed germination of five weedy rice (Oryza spp.) strains. Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 2010, 33, 243–250. [Google Scholar]
  79. Mansor, M.; Rezaul Karim, S.M.; Abidin, Z. Effects of farmers’ cultural practices on the weedy rice infestation and rice production. Sci. Res. Essays 2012, 7, 609–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mohamed, Z.; Terani, R.; Shamsudin, M.N.; Latif, I.A. Paddy farmers’ sustainability practices in granary areas in Malaysia. Resour. 2016, 5, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Terano, R.; Mohamed, Z.; Din, N.S.Z. Determinants of farmers’ adoption of clearfield production system in Malaysia. Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia 2016, 9, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Mahmod, I.F.; Jeyasimman, S.; Mispan, M.S.; Supandi, F.; Khatib, A.; Saiman, M.Z. Comparative metabolomics analysis of weedy rice (Oryza spp.) across peninsular Malaysia. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Baki, B.B. Weed Ecology and Management in Rice Ecosystems; Universiti Malaya Press: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  84. Dai, X.; Shen, L. Advances and trends in omics technology development. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 911861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Maroli, A.S.; Gaines, T.A.; Foley, M.E.; Duke, S.O.; Doğramacı, M.; Anderson, J.V.; Horvath, D.P.; Chao, W.S.; Tharayil, N. Omics in weed science: A perspective from genomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics approaches. Weed Sci. 2018, 66, 681–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Van Emon, J.M. The omics revolution in agricultural research. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Patterson, E.; Saski, C.; Küpper, A.; Beffa, R.; Gaines, T.A. Omics potential in herbicide-resistant weed management. Plants 2019, 8, 607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Goad, D.M.; Jia, Y.; Gibbons, A.; Liu, Y.; Gealy, D.; Caicedo, A.L.; Olsen, K.M. Identification of novel QTL conferring sheath blight resistance in two weedy rice mapping populations. Rice 2020, 13, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Lin, Y.L.; Wu, D.H.; Wu, C.C.; Huang, Y.F. Explore the genetics of weedy traits using rice 3K database. Bot. Stud. 2021, 62, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Nguyen, T.; Fu, K.; Mou, C.; Yu, J.; Zhu, X.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, C.; Hao, Q.; Zhang, F.; Song, W.; et al. Fine mapping of qSdr9, a novel locus for seed dormancy (SD) in weedy rice, and development of NILs with a strong SD allele. Mol. Breed. 2020, 40, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yean, R.A.; Dilipkumar, M.; Rahman, S.; Song, B.K. A two-in-one strategy: Target and nontarget site mechanisms both play important role in IMI-resistant weedy rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Buffon, G.; Blasi, E.A.D.R.; Lamb, T.I.; Adamski, J.M.; Schwambach, J.; Ricachenevsky, F.K.; Bertolazi, A.; Silveira, V.; Lopes, M.C.B.; Sperotto, R.A. Oryza sativa cv. Nipponbare and Oryza barthii as unexpected tolerance and susceptibility sources against Schizotetranychus oryzae (Acari: Tetranychidae) mite infestation. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 613568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Oliveira, C.; Agostinetto, D.; Langaro, A.C.; Garcia, J.R.; Lamego, F.P. Physiological and molecular responses in rice, weedy rice and barnyardgrass exposed to supra-optimal temperatures. Planta Daninha 2019, 37, e019182522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Pan, Y.; Liang, H.; Gao, L.; Dai, G.; Chen, W.; Yang, X.; Wu, H.; Qing, D.; Gao, J.; Huang, J.; et al. Transcriptomic profiling of germinating seeds under cold stress and characterization of the cold-tolerant gene LTG5 in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Subudhi, P.K.; Garcia, R.S.; Coronejo, S.; Tapia, R. Comparative transcriptomics of rice genotypes with contrasting responses to nitrogen stress reveals genes influencing nitrogen uptake through the regulation of root architecture. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Xiong, Q.; Chen, X.; Shen, T.; Zhong, L.; Zhu, C.; Peng, X.; He, X.; Fu, J.; Ouyang, L.; Bian, J.; et al. Metabolomics and proteomics analyses of grain yield reduction in rice under abrupt drought-flood alternation. bioRxiv 2018, 271940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wang, X.Q.; Kwon, S.W.; Park, Y.J. Evaluation of genetic diversity and linkage disequilibrium in Korea-bred rice varieties using SSR markers. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2013, 16, 5. [Google Scholar]
  98. He, Z.; Jiang, X.; Ratnasekera, D.; Grassi, F.; Perera, U.; Lu, B.R. Seedmediated gene flow promotes genetic diversity of weedy rice within populations: Implications for weed management. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e112778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Sun, Q.; Li, T.Y.; Li, D.D.; Wang, Z.Y.; Li, S.; Li, D.P.; Han, X.; Liu, J.M.; Xuan, Y.H. Overexpression of loose plant architecture 1 increases planting density and resistance to sheath blight disease via activation of PIN-FORMED 1a in rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Qiu, J.; Zhu, J.; Fu, F.; Ye, C.Y.; Wang, W.; Mao, L.; Lin, Z.; Chen, L.; Zhang, H.; Guo, L.; et al. Genome re-sequencing suggested a weedy rice origin from domesticated indicajaponica hybridization: A case study from southern China. Planta 2014, 240, 1353–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Qiu, J.; Zhou, Y.; Mao, L.; Ye, C.; Wang, W.; Zhang, J.; Yu, Y.; Fu, F.; Wang, Y.; Qian, F.; et al. Genomic variation associated with local adaptation of weedy rice during de-domestication. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Qiu, J.; Jia, L.; Wu, D.; Weng, X.; Chen, L.; Sun, J.; Chen, M.; Mao, L.; Jiang, B.; Ye, C.; et al. Diverse genetic mechanisms underlie worldwide convergent rice feralization. Genome Biol. 2020, 21, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Sun, J.; Qian, Q.; Ma, D.R.; Xu, Z.J.; Liu, D.; Du, H.B.; Chen, W.F. Introgression and selection shaping the genome and adaptive loci of weedy rice in northern China. New Phytol. 2013, 197, 290–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Thurber, C.S.; Jia, M.H.; Jia, Y.; Caicedo, A.L. Similar traits, different genes? Examining convergent evolution in related weedy rice population. Mol. Ecol. 2013, 22, 685–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Vigueira, C.C.; Qi, X.; Song, B.K.; Li, L.F.; Caicedo, A.L.; Jia, Y.; Olsen, K.M. Call of the wild rice: Oryza rufipogon shapes weedy rice evolution in Southeast Asia. Evol. Appl. 2018, 12, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Islam, M.S.; Coronejo, S.; Subudhi, P.K. Whole-genome sequencing reveals uniqueness of black-hulled and straw-hulled weedy rice genomes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2020, 133, 2461–2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Wang, W.; Zhao, M.; Zhang, G.; Liu, Z.; Hua, Y.; Jia, X.; Song, J.; Ma, D.; Sun, J. Weedy rice as a novel gene resource: A genome-wide association study of anthocyanin biosynthesis and an evaluation of nutritional quality. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Kong, H.; Wang, Z.; Guo, J.Y.; Xia, Q.Y.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, Y.L.; Guo, A.P.; Lu, B.R. Increases in genetic diversity of weedy rice associated with ambient temperatures and limited gene flow. Biology 2021, 10, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Han, B.; Ma, X.; Cui, D.; Wang, Y.; Geng, L.; Cao, G.; Zhang, H.; Koh, H.J.; Han, L. Analysis of evolutionary relationships provides new clues to the origins of weedy rice. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 10, 891–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lang, H.; He, Y.; Sun, J.; Li, F.; Ma, D. Integrative hormone and transcriptome analyses underline the role of abscisic acid in seed shattering of weedy rice. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 94, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Bevilacqua, C.B.; Basu, S.; Pereira, A.; Tseng, T.M.; Zimmer, P.D.; Burgos, N.R. Analysis of stress-responsive gene expression in cultivated and weedy rice differing in cold stress tolerance. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0132100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Guan, S.; Xu, Q.; Ma, D.; Zhang, W.; Xu, Z.; Zhao, M.; Guo, Z. Transcriptomics profiling in response to cold stress in cultivated rice and weedy rice. Gene 2019, 685, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Nam, K.H.; Kim, D.Y.; Moon, Y.S.; Pack, I.S.; Jeong, S.C.; Kim, H.B.; Kim, C.G. Performance of hybrids between abiotic stress-tolerant transgenic rice and its weedy relatives under water-stressed conditions. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Han, B.; Ma, X.; Cui, D.; Geng, L.; Cao, G.; Zhang, H.; Han, L. Parallel reaction monitoring revealed tolerance to drought proteins in weedy rice (Oryza sativa f. spontanea). Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Nam, M.H.; Bang, E.; Kwon, T.Y.; Kim, Y.; Kim, E.H.; Cho, K.; Park, W.J.; Kim, B.G.; Yoon, I.S. Metabolite profiling of diverse rice germplasm and identification of conserved metabolic markers of rice roots in response to long-term mild salinity stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 21959–21974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Yan, H.; Ma, L.; Wang, Z.; Lin, Z.; Su, J.; Lu, B.R. Multiple tissue-specific expression of rice seed-shattering gene SH4 regulated by its promoter pSH4. Rice 2015, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Zhang, S.; Tian, L.; Li, J.; Wang, C.; Lee, D.; Peng, R.; Chen, L. Morphological characterization of weedy rice populations from different regions of Asia. Mol. Plant Breed. 2017, 8, 52–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Fogliatto, S.; Vidotto, F.; Ferrero, A. Germination of weedy rice in response to field conditions during winter. Weed Technol. 2011, 25, 252–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Fukuda, A.; Shimizu, H.; Shiratsuchi, H.; Yamaguchi, H.; Ohdaira, Y.; Mochida, H. Complementary genes that cause black ripening hulls in F1 plants of crosses between indica and japonica rice cultivars. Plant Prod. Sci. 2012, 15, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Gu, X.Y.; Foley, M.E.; Horvath, D.P.; Anderson, J.V.; Feng, J.; Zhang, L.; Mowry, C.R.; Ye, H.; Suttle, J.C.; Kadowaki, K.I.; et al. Association between seed dormancy and pericarp color is controlled by a pleiotropic gene that regulates abscisic acid and flavonoid synthesis in weedy red rice. Genetics 2011, 189, 1515–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Prathepa, P. Pericarp colour and haplotype diversity in weedy rice (O. sativa f. spontanea) from Thailand. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2009, 12, 1075–1079. [Google Scholar]
  122. Vigueira, C.C.; Li, W.; Olsen, K.M. The role of Bh4 in parallel evolution of hull colour in domesticated and weedy rice. J. Evol. Biol. 2013, 26, 1738–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Roma-Burgos, N.; San Sudo, M.P.; Olsen, K.M.; Werle, I.; Song, B.K. Weedy rice (Oryza spp.): What’s in a name? Weed Sci. 2021, 69, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Thurber, C.S.; Hepler, P.K.; Caicedo, A.L. Timing is everything: Early degradation of abscission layer is associated with increased seed shattering in US weedy rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Akasaka, M.; Konishi, S.; Izawa, T.; Ushiki, J. Histological and genetic characteristics associated with the seed-shattering habit of weedy rice (Oryza sativa L.) from Okayama, Japan. Breed. Sci. 2011, 61, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Hua, L.; Wang, D.R.; Tan, L.; Fu, Y.; Liu, F.; Xiao, L.; Zhu, Z.; Fu, Q.; Sun, X.; Gu, P.; et al. LABA1, a domestication gene associated with long, barbed awns in wild rice. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 1875–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Luo, J.; Liu, H.; Zhou, T.; Gu, B.; Huang, X.; Shangguan, Y.; Zhu, J.; Li, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.; et al. An-1 encodes a basic helix-loop-helix protein that regulates awn development, grain size, and grain number in rice. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 3360–3376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Sugimoto, K.; Takeuchi, Y.; Ebana, K.; Miyao, A.; Hirochika, H.; Hara, N.; Kobayashi, M.; Ban, Y.; Hattori, T.; Yano, M. Molecular cloning of Sdr4, a regulator involved in seed dormancy and domestication of rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 5792–5797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Reagon, M.; Thurber, C.S.; Olsen, K.M.; Jia, Y.; Caicedo, A.L. The long and the short of it: SD1 polymorphism and the evolution of growth trait divergence in US weedy rice. Mol. Ecol. 2011, 20, 3743–3756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Inagaki, N.; Asami, H.; Hirabayashi, H.; Uchino, A.; Imaizumi, T.; Ishimaru, K. A Rice Ancestral Genetic Resource Conferring Ideal Plant Shapes for Vegetative Growth and Weed Suppression. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 748531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Ishii, T.; Numaguchi, K.; Miura, K.; Yoshida, K.; Thanh, P.T.; Htun, T.M.; Yamasaki, M.; Komeda, N.; Matsumoto, T.; Terauchi, R.; et al. OsLG1 regulates a closed panicle trait in domesticated rice. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 462–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Subudhi, P.K.; De Leon, T.B.; Tapia, R.; Chai, C.; Karan, R.; Ontoy, J.; Singh, P.K. Genetic interaction involving photoperiod-responsive Hd1 promotes early flowering under long-day conditions in rice. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Zhang, Y.; Fang, J.; Wu, X.; Dong, L. Na+/K+ balance and transport regulatory mechanisms in weedy and cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.) under salt stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Piveta, L.B.; Roma-Burgos, N.; Noldin, J.A.; Viana, V.E.; Oliveira, C.D.; Lamego, F.P.; Avila, L.A.D. Molecular and physiological responses of rice and weedy rice to heat and drought stress. Agriculture 2020, 11, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Kaspary, T.E.; Cutti, L.; Rafaeli, R.S.; Delatorre, C.A.; Merotto, A., Jr. Genes related to flooding tolerance during germination and early growth of weedy rice. Weed Res. 2020, 60, 435–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Jin, M.; Chen, L.; Deng, X.W.; Tang, X. Development of herbicide resistance genes and their application in rice. Crop J. 2022, 10, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Jia, Y.; Gealy, D. Weedy red rice has novel sources of resistance to biotic stress. Crop J. 2018, 6, 443–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Zhu, Y.; Ellstrand, N.C.; Lu, B.R. Sequence polymorphisms in wild, weedy, and cultivated rice suggest seed-shattering locus sh4 played a minor role in Asian rice domestication. Ecol. Evol. 2012, 2, 2106–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Amarasinghe, Y.P.J.; Kuwata, R.; Nishimura, A.; Phan, P.D.T.; Ishikawa, R.; Ishii, T. Evaluation of domestication loci associated with awnlessness in cultivated rice, Oryza sativa. Rice 2020, 13, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Wu, C.C.; Wei, F.J.; Chiou, W.Y.; Tsai, Y.C.; Wu, H.P.; Gotarkar, D.; Wei, Z.H.; Lai, B.H.; Hsing, Y.I.C. Studies of rice Hd1 haplotypes worldwide reveal adaptation of flowering time to different environments. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0239028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. He, Q.; Kim, K.W.; Park, Y.J. Population genomics identifies the origin and signatures of selection of Korean weedy rice. Plant Biotech. J. 2017, 15, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Lee, S.; Jia, Y.; Jia, M.; Gealy, D.R.; Olsen, K.M.; Caicedo, A.L. Molecular evolution of the rice blast resistance gene Pi-ta in invasive weedy rice in the USA. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e26260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Wang, W.; Xia, H.; Yang, X.; Xu, T.; Si, H.J.; Cai, X.X.; Wang, F.; Su, J.; Snow, A.A.; Lu, B.R. A novel 5-enolpyruvoylshikimate-3-phosphate (EPSP) synthase transgene for glyphosate resistance stimulates growth and fecundity in weedy rice (Oryza sativa) without herbicide. New Phytol. 2014, 202, 679–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Katam, R.; Lin, C.; Grant, K.; Katam, C.S.; Chen, S. Advances in plant metabolomics and its applications in stress and single-cell biology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Obata, T.; Fernie, A.R. The use of metabolomics to dissect plant response to abiotic stresses. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2012, 69, 3225–3243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Deng, M.; Zhang, X.; Luo, J.; Liu, H.; Wen, W.; Luo, H.; Yan, J.; Xiao, Y. Metabolomics analysis reveals differences in evolution between maize and rice. Plant J. 2020, 103, 1710–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Razzaq, A.; Sadia, B.; Raza, A.; Khalid Hameed, M.; Saleem, F. Metabolomics: A way forward for crop improvement. Metabolites 2019, 9, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Uawisetwathana, U.; Karoonuthaisiri, N. Metabolomics for rice quality and traceability: Feasibility and future aspects. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2019, 28, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Kim, H.K.; Choi, Y.H.; Verpoorte, R. NMR-based plant metabolomics: Where do we stand, where do we go? Trends Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Kusano, M.; Yang, Z.; Okazaki, Y. Using metabolomic approaches to explore chemical diversity in rice. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Hu, C.; Shi, J.; Quan, S.; Cui, B.; Kleessen, S.; Nikoloski, Z.; Tohge, T.; Alexander, D.; Guo, L.; Lin, H.; et al. Metabolic variation between japonica and indica rice cultivars as revealed by non-targeted metabolomics. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 5067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Ishikawa, T.; Takahara, K.; Hirabayashi, T.; Matsumura, H.; Fujisawa, S.; Terauchi, R.; Uchimiya, H.; Kawai-Yamada, M. Metabolome analysis of response to oxidative stress in rice suspension cells overexpressing cell death suppressor Bax inhibitor-1. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Sana, T.R.; Fischer, S.; Wohlgemuth, G.; Katrekar, A.; Jung, K.H.; Ronald, P.C.; Fiehn, O. Metabolomic and transcriptomic analysis of the rice response to the bacterial blight pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Metabolomics 2010, 6, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Mumm, R.; Hageman, J.A.; Calingacion, M.N.; De Vos, R.C.H.; Jonker, H.H.; Erban, A.; Kopka, J.; Hansen, T.H.; Laursen, K.H.; Schjoerring, J.K.; et al. Multi-platform metabolomics analyses of a broad collection of fragrant and non-fragrant rice varieties reveals the high complexity of grain quality characteristics. Metabolomics 2016, 12, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Pramai, P.; Hamid, N.A.A.; Mediani, A.; Maulidiani, M.; Abas, F.; Jiamyangyuen, S. Metabolite profiling, antioxidant, and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities of germinated rice: Nuclear-magnetic-resonance-based metabolomics study. J. Food Drug Anal. 2018, 26, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Zarei, I.; Luna, E.; Leach, J.E.; McClung, A.; Vilchez, S.; Koita, O.; Ryan, E.P. Comparative rice bran metabolomics across diverse cultivars and functional rice gene-bran metabolite relationships. Metabolites 2018, 8, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Nadir, S.; Xiong, H.B.; Zhu, Q.; Zhang, X.L.; Xu, H.Y.; Li, J.; Dongchen, W.; Henry, D.; Guo, X.Q.; Khan, S.; et al. Weedy rice in sustainable rice production. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2017, 37, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Lawas, L.M.F.; Erban, A.; Kopka, J.; Jagadish, S.V.K.; Zuther, E.; Hincha, D.K. Metabolic responses of rice source and sink organs during recovery from combined drought and heat stress in the field. Gigascience 2019, 8, giz102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Yasmin, S.; Hafeez, F.Y.; Mirza, M.S.; Rasul, M.; Arshad, H.M.; Zubair, M.; Iqbal, M. Biocontrol of bacterial leaf blight of rice and profiling of secondary metabolites produced by rhizospheric Pseudomonas aeruginosa BRp3. Front. Microb. 2017, 8, 1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Pipatpongpinyo, W.; Korkmaz, U.; Wu, H.; Kena, A.; Ye, H.; Feng, J.; Gu, X.Y. Assembling seed dormancy genes into a system identified their effects on seedbank longevity in weedy rice. Heredity 2020, 124, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Howel, K.A.; Narsai, R.; Carroll, A.; Ivanova, A.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B.; Millar, A.H.; Whelan, J. Mapping metabolic and transcript temporal switches during germination in rice highlights specific transcriptions factors and the role of RNA instability in the germination process. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 961–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Frank, T.; Reichardt, B.; Shu, Q.; Engel, K.H. Metabolite profiling of coloured rice (Oryza sativa L.) grains. J. Cereal Sci. 2012, 55, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Lee, D.Y.; Shrestha, S.; Seo, W.D.; Lee, M.H.; Jeong, T.S.; Cho, J.H.; Song, Y.C.; Kang, H.W.; Rho, Y.D.; Baek, N.I. Structural and quantitative analysis of antioxidant and low-density lipoprotein-antioxidant flavonoids from the grains of sugary rice. J. Med. Food 2012, 15, 399–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Pereira-Caro, G.; Cros, G.; Yokota, T.; Crozier, A. Phytochemical profiles of black, red, brown, and white rice from the Camargue region of France. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 7976–7986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Kim, G.R.; Jung, E.S.; Lee, S.; Lim, S.H.; Ha, S.H.; Lee, C.H. Combined mass spectrometry-based metabolite profiling of different pigmented rice (Oryza sativa L.) seeds and correlation with antioxidant activities. Molecules 2014, 19, 15673–15686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Wijaya, D.N.; Susanto, F.A.; Purwestri, Y.A.; Ismoyowati, D.; Nuringtyas, T.R. NMR metabolite comparison of local pigmented rice in Yogyakarta. Indones. J. Biotechnol. 2017, 22, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Lin, Z.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Alexander, D.; Li, G.; Wang, S.; Ding, Y. Metabolomic analysis of pathways related to rice grain chalkiness by a notched-belly mutant with high occurrence of white-belly grains. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Ranjitha, H.P.; Gowda, R.; Nethra, N.; Amruta, N.; Kandikattu, H.K. Biochemical and metabolomics on rice cultivars. Rice Sci. 2019, 26, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Song, E.H.; Kim, H.J.; Jeong, J.; Chung, H.J.; Kim, H.Y.; Bang, E.; Hong, Y.S. A 1H HR-MAS NMR-based metabolomic study for metabolic characterization of rice grain from various Oryza sativa L. cultivars. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 3009–3016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Heuberger, A.L.; Lewis, M.R.; Chen, M.H.; Brick, M.A.; Leach, J.E.; Ryan, E.P. Metabolomic and functional genomic analyses reveal varietal differences in bioactive compounds of cooked rice. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e12915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Gong, L.; Chen, W.; Gao, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, H.; Xu, C.; Yu, S.; Zhang, Q.; Luo, J. Genetic analysis of the metabolome exemplified using a rice population. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 20320–20325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Jom, K.N.; Lorjaroenphon, Y.; Udompijitkul, P. Differentiation of four varieties of germinating Thai colored indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) by metabolite profiling. Food Sci. Tech. Res. 2016, 22, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Kim, T.J.; Kim, S.Y.; Park, Y.J.; Lim, S.H.; Ha, S.H.; Park, S.U.; Lee, B.; Kim, J.K. Metabolite profiling reveals distinct modulation of complex metabolic networks in non-pigmented, black, and red rice (Oryza sativa L.) Cultivars. Metabolites 2021, 11, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Yang, Y.; Saand, M.A.; Huang, L.; Abdelaal, W.B.; Zhang, J.; Wu, Y.; Li, J.; Sirohi, M.H.; Wang, F. Applications of multi-omics technologies for crop improvement. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 563953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Barding, G.A.; Beni, S.; Fukao, T.; Bailey-Serres, J.; Larive, C.K. Comparison of GC-MS and NMR for metabolite profiling of rice subjected to submergence stress. Proteome Res. 2012, 12, 898–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Barding, G.A.; Fukao, T.; Beni, S.; Bailey-Serres, J.; Larive, C.K. Differential metabolomic regulation governed by the rice SUB1A gene during submergence stress and identification of alanylglycine by 1H NMR spectroscopy. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 11, 320–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Jung, E.S.; Lee, S.; Lim, S.H.; Ha, S.H.; Liu, K.H.; Lee, C.H. Metabolite profiling of the short-term responses of rice leaves (Oryza sativa cv. Ilmi) cultivated under different LED lights and its correlations with antioxidant activities. Plant Sci. 2013, 210, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Degenkolbe, T.; Do, P.T.; Kopka, J.; Zuther, E.; Hincha, D.K.; Kohl, K.I. Identification of drought tolerance markers in a diverse population of rice cultivars by expression and metabolite profiling. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e63637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Uawisetwathana, U.; Graham, S.F.; Kamolsukyunyong, W.; Sukhaket, W.; Klanchui, A.; Toojinda, T.; Vanavichit, A.; Karoonuthaisiri, N.; Elliot, C.T. Quantitative 1H NMR metabolome profiling of Thai jasmin rice (Oryza sativa) reveals primary metabolic response during brown planthopper infestation. Metabolomics 2015, 11, 1640–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Maruyama, K.; Urano, K.; Yoshiwara, K.; Morishita, Y.; Sakurai, N.; Suzuki, H.; Kojima, M.; Sakakibara, H.; Shibata, D.; Saito, K.; et al. Integrated analysis of the effects of cold and dehydration on rice metabolites, phytohormones, and gene transcripts. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 1759–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Kang, K.; Yue, L.; Xia, X.; Liu, X.; Zhang, W. Comparative metaabolomics analysis of different resistant rice varieties in response to the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens Hemiptera: Delphacidae. Metabolomics 2019, 15, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Zhao, X.; Wang, W.; Zhang, F.; Deng, J.; Li, Z.; Fu, B. Comparative metabolite profiling of two rice genotypes with contrasting salt stress tolerance at the seedling stage. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e108020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Casartelli, A.; Riewe, D.; Hubberten, H.M.; Altman, T.; Hoefgen, R.; Heuer, S. Exploring traditional aus-type rice for metabolites conferring drought tolerance. Rice 2018, 11, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Xu, X.H.; Wang, C.; Li, S.X.; Su, Z.Z.; Zhao, H.N.; Mao, L.J.; Feng, X.X.; Liu, P.P.; Chen, X.; Synder, J.H.; et al. Friend or foe: Differential responses of rice to invasion by mutualistic or pathogenic fungi revealed by RNAseq and metabolite profiling. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Pinu, F.R.; Beale, D.J.; Paten, A.M.; Kouremenos, K.; Swarup, S.; Schirra, H.J.; Wishart, D. Systems biology and multi-omics integration: Viewpoints from the metabolomics research community. Metabolites 2019, 9, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, F.; Deng, Y.; Sun, L.; Mao, M.; Chen, R.; Qiang, Q.; Zhou, J.; Long, T.; Zhao, X.; et al. Integrated metabolomics and transcriptomics analyses reveal the metabolic differences and molecular basis of nutritional quality in landraces and cultivated rice. Metabolites 2022, 12, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Chen, Y.S.; Ho, T.H.D.; Liu, L.; Lee, D.H.; Lee, C.H.; Chen, Y.R.; Lin, S.Y.; Lu, C.A.; Yu, S.M. Sugar starvation-regulated MYBS2 and 14–3-3 protein interactions enhance plant growth, stress tolerance, and grain weight in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 21925–21935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Xie, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y.; Xu, J.; Li, Z.; Zhou, X.; Fu, B. Integrated analysis of the transcriptome and metabolome revealed the molecular mechanisms underlying the enhanced salt tolerance of rice due to the application of exogenous melatonin. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 618680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Wang, J.; Su, C.; Cui, Z.; Huang, L.; Gu, S.; Jiang, S.; Feng, J.; Xu, H.; Zhang, W.; Jiang, L.; et al. Transcriptomics and metabolomics reveal tolerance new mechanism of rice roots to Al stress. Front. Genet. 2023, 13, 1063984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Karmakar, S.; Datta, K.; Molla, K.A.; Gayen, D.; Das, K.; Sarkar, S.N.; Datta, S.K. Proteo-metabolomic investigation of transgenic rice unravels metabolic alterations and accumulation of novel proteins potentially involved in defence against Rhizoctonia solani. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Vo, K.T.X.; Rahman, M.M.; Rahman, M.M.; Trinh, K.T.T.; Kim, S.T.; Jeon, J. proteomics and metabolomics studies on the biotic stress responses of rice: An update. Rice 2021, 14, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Zhang, G.; Liu, Y.; Gui, R.; Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; Han, Y.; Guo, X.; Sun, J. Comparative multi-omics analysis of hypoxic germination tolerance in weedy rice embryos and coleoptiles. Genomics 2021, 113, 3337–3348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Rai, N.; Zhang, Y.; Ram, B.G.; Schumacher, L.; Yellavajjala, R.K.; Bajwa, S.; Sun, X. Application of deep learning in precision weed management: A review. Comp. Elec. Agric. 2023, 206, 107698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Vasileiou, M.; Kyrgiakos, L.N.; Kleisiari, C.; Kleftodimos, G.; Vlontzos, G.; Belhouchette, H.; Pardalos, P.M. Transforming weed management in sustainable agriculture with artificial intelligence: A systematic literature review towards weed identification and deep learning. Crop Prot. 2024, 176, 106522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Dadashzadeh, M.; Abbaspour-Gilandeh, Y.; Mesri-Gundoshmian, T.; Sabzi, S.; Arribas, J.I. A strereoscopic video computer vision system for weed discrimination in rice field under both natural and controlled light conditions by machine learning. Measurement 2024, 237, 115072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A schematic illustration of the evolutionary relationship among cultivated rice, progenitor (wild rice), and conspecific weed (weedy rice).
Figure 1. A schematic illustration of the evolutionary relationship among cultivated rice, progenitor (wild rice), and conspecific weed (weedy rice).
Agriculture 14 01307 g001
Figure 2. Omics study involves genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics and phenomics toward a better understanding of systems biology.
Figure 2. Omics study involves genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics and phenomics toward a better understanding of systems biology.
Agriculture 14 01307 g002
Table 1. The progress of rice agronomic practices in Peninsular Malaysia from 1970–2020.
Table 1. The progress of rice agronomic practices in Peninsular Malaysia from 1970–2020.
YearsAgronomical PracticesRice MorphologyProblemsRice Varieties DevelopmentWeedy Rice Issues
Pre-1970
  • Manual transplanting
  • Manual harvesting
  • Single crop per year
  • Tall
  • Easy shattering
  • Later maturity
  • Heavy shattering
  • High lodging resistance
  • Sheath blast
Mahsuri, Murni, Masria, Jaya, Sri Malaysia 11, Pulut Malaysia 1, Setanjung, Sekembang, SekencangNo reports of weedy rice
1971–1975
  • Double cropping
  • Intensified research on cultural practices
  • Moderate height
  • Non-shattered
  • Short maturity
  • Bacteria leaf blight
  • Panicle blight
  • Stem borer
  • Plant hopper
Kadaria, Pulut Siding, Manik, Muda, Seberang, Makmur, MR81, MR84
1976–1985
  • Direct seeding
  • Improved infrastructure for irrigation
  • Full use of combined harvester
  • Semi-dwarf
  • High germination rate
  • Short maturity
  • Long and slender rice
  • Heavy grain weight
  • Quality fragrance
  • Pests (rat, plant hopper)
  • Diseases
MR103, MR106, PH9, MR123, MR127, MR159, MR167, MR185, MR211, MRQ50
1986–1997
  • Integrated weed management
  • Foliar and panicle blast
MR219, MR220, MRQ74, MR232, MR220CL1, MR220CL2, MRM16, MR253, MR263First report of weedy rice
1998–2010
  • Modern cultivation
  • Fully mechanized
Weedy rice mimicking cultivated rice.
2011–2020
  • Breeding expansion
  • Aerobic rice
  • System of rice intensification (SRI)
  • Target to achieve 80% self-sufficiency level (SSL)
  • Semi-dwarf
  • High germination rate
  • Short maturity
  • High yield inbred and hybrid
  • Good resistance
  • Colored rice and milled rice grade
  • Lack of desired phenotypes
MR269, MR284, MARDI Sempadan 303, MARDI Sebernas 207, MR1A, MRQ76Weedy rice resistance to herbicide and tolerance to stress conditions
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mahmod, I.F.; Syed Bakar, S.N.; Mispan, M.S.; Supandi, F.; Mohamed, Z.; Saiman, M.Z. Weedy Rice Infestation in Malaysia: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? Agriculture 2024, 14, 1307. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14081307

AMA Style

Mahmod IF, Syed Bakar SN, Mispan MS, Supandi F, Mohamed Z, Saiman MZ. Weedy Rice Infestation in Malaysia: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? Agriculture. 2024; 14(8):1307. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14081307

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mahmod, Intan Filzah, Sharifah Nurnabilah Syed Bakar, Muhamad Shakirin Mispan, Farahaniza Supandi, Zulqarnain Mohamed, and Mohd Zuwairi Saiman. 2024. "Weedy Rice Infestation in Malaysia: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go?" Agriculture 14, no. 8: 1307. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14081307

APA Style

Mahmod, I. F., Syed Bakar, S. N., Mispan, M. S., Supandi, F., Mohamed, Z., & Saiman, M. Z. (2024). Weedy Rice Infestation in Malaysia: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? Agriculture, 14(8), 1307. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14081307

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop