Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Pig Futures on the Price Transmission in the Pig Industry Chain during Market Shocks
Previous Article in Journal
Design of a Leaf-Bottom Pest Control Robot with Adaptive Chassis and Adjustable Selective Nozzle
Previous Article in Special Issue
Implementation of a Circular Bioeconomy: Obtaining Cellulose Fibers Derived from Portuguese Vine Pruning Residues for Heritage Conservation, Oxidized with TEMPO and Ultrasonic Treatment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Solid-State Fermentation for Phenolic Compounds Recovery from Mexican Oregano (Lippia graveolens Kunth) Residual Leaves Applying a Lactic Acid Bacteria (Leuconostoc mesenteroides)

by
Israel Bautista-Hernández
1,2,
Ricardo Gómez-García
3,4,
Cristóbal N. Aguilar
1,2,
Guillermo C. G. Martínez-Ávila
5,
Cristian Torres-León
6 and
Mónica L. Chávez-González
1,2,*
1
Bioprocess & Bioproducts Group, Food Research Department, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Saltillo 25280, Coahuila, Mexico
2
Bioprocess & Bioproducts Group, Food Research Department, School of Chemistry, Autonomus University of Coahuila, Saltillo 25280, Coahuila, Mexico
3
CBQF—Centro de Biotecnologia e Quimica Fina—Laboratorio Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Catolica portuguesa, Diogo Botelho 1327, 416-005 Porto, Portugal
4
CIICYT—Centro de Investigación e Innovación Científica y Tecnológica, Autonomius University of Coahuila, Saltillo 25280, Coahuilo, Mexico
5
Laboratory of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Agronomy, Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon General Escobedo 66050, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
6
Research Center and Ethnobiological Garden (CIJE), Autonomous University of Coahuila, Unidad Torreon, Viesca 27480, Coahuila, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2024, 14(8), 1342; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14081342
Submission received: 16 July 2024 / Revised: 8 August 2024 / Accepted: 9 August 2024 / Published: 11 August 2024

Abstract

:
The Mexican oregano by-products are a source of bioactive molecules (polyphenols) that could be extracted using solid-state fermentation (SSF). This study fermented the by-products via SSF (120 h) with a lactic acid bacteria (LAB) Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Sequentially, a bioactive and chemical determination was made according to the phenolic content, antioxidant activity (DPPH/FRAP), bioactive properties (α-amylase inhibition and antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli), and chemical composition (HPLC-MS). The results showed that the total phenolics and flavonoid content, as well as the antioxidant activity, increased (0.60, 2.55, and 3.01 times, respectively) during the SSF process compared with unfermented material. Also, the extracts showed antimicrobial activity against E. coli and α-amylase inhibition. These inhibitory results could be attributed to bioactive compounds identified via HPLC, such as gardenin B, trachelogenin, ferulic acid, and resveratrol 3-O-glucoside. Therefore, the application of L. mesenteroides under SSF on oregano by-products comprises an eco-friendly strategy for their valorization as raw materials for the recovery of phenolic compounds that could be natural alternatives against synthetic antioxidant and antimicrobial agents, promoting a more circular and sustainable supply system within the oregano industry.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, conventional production lines must change for sustainable modernization according to the new trends through the implementation of a “circular economy” and “sustainable intensification” concepts accompanied by principles such as “elimination of residues”, “zero-waste”, “regeneration of natural environments”, and pollution prevention [1,2]. Under this new perspective, the rural activities developed in the north of Mexico comprise a potential target for modernization, especially the exploitation of native oregano plants (Lippia graveolens kunth), the cultivation of which entails cooperative production (5 or more communities) and has been reported to reach up to 6500 tons oregano/year [3]; mainly, its economic income is due to the sale of dry biomass.
However, the growing interest in essential oils (EOs) has promoted the cultivation of oregano as a source of EOs; in the last decade, it has been reported that there are 50 cultivated hectares for EO extraction (Chihuahua state) with a potential production of 104.5 tons, which could produce a range of spent oregano biomass between 104.51 and 101.88 tons according to the extraction efficiency (0.36–2.5%) of the equipment [4,5,6]. Additionally, the economic analysis made by the Mexican Secretariat of Economy showed in March 2024 that the financial sector in Mexico related to EO, perfumery, and cosmetics, among others, has reached USD 3.18 billion (Exports) [7]; a growing value for the EO sector. Unfortunately, the EO extraction techniques include mainly conventional methods (e.g., hydro-distillation) with lower extraction yields with vast quantities of unexplored residual production (50 and 90 kg of solid wastes per essential oil litter), principally aromatic water and spent oregano leaves that remain without any potential application and end up in landfills, causing environmental and economic issue [8,9,10,11].
However, the spent biomass encompasses a potential valuable bioactive source due to previous research projects that have reported the rich chemical composition of oregano by-products: flavonoid (14.3–54.7 mg/dry g), anthocyanins (0.38–10.2 mg/100 g), or tannins (12.4–510.3 mg/g) content [12,13,14]. Also, Cid-Peréz et al. [15] reported antioxidant and antimicrobial compounds as bioactive non-volatile compounds (caffeic and rosmarinic acid) in polar subfractions, and thymoquinone, thymol, and carvacrol, among others (non-polar solvents), highlighting that it is possible to extract valuable molecules from oregano by-products. Thus, the potential recovery of bioactive compounds from oregano by-products comprises an attractive alternative for revalorizing these residual materials.
A novel technology for recovering bioactive compounds is SSF, which is defined as the growth of microorganisms on solid lignocellulosic substrates that act as a nutrient source in the near absence of water (with little or no added water) [16]. This technology has advantages such as low energy and water requirements, agro-industrial residues as a carbon source, and simple equipment in comparison with emerging technologies [17,18,19,20,21]. These characteristics are fascinating for a potential future integration by the local communities in the north of Mexico.
Regarding SSF, the main applied microorganisms involve fungal strains (e.g., Aspergillus spp.) due to their efficient enzymatic system and low moisture requirements [22,23,24]. However, its application could be limited by the potential production of mycotoxins, which could have a negative impact on human health. Thus, the search for novel GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) strains has been a novel topic to implement safer bioprocessing technologies. Recently, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have gained attention as an attractive group for SSF with advantages such as being GRAS microorganisms, the production of secondary metabolites (bacteriocins, organic acids, volatile compounds, etc.), sensorial property boosting, and functioning as a means of potential integral valorization of soluble extracts and residual biomass (fermented after SSF) [25]. Previously, their application has been explored in soybean and vegetable sources for the recovery of bioactive compounds (polyphenols) via hydrolytic machinery (feruloyl esterase, β-glucosidase, and tannase) [26,27,28] that release the bond phenolics linked to the cell wall [29].
Among LAB strains, Leuconostoc comprises a novel genus with the ability to produce aromatic compounds, exopolysaccharides, and bacteriocins [30], with a reported application for plant-fermented products (Kimchi and sauerkraut) and a successful application to increase the phenolic content in ginseng [31,32]. Thus, Leuconostoc spp. could be an excellent microorganism to develop an SSF valorization technique for the extraction and production of bioactive compounds (extracts) and produce fermented biomass similar to current food products (e.g., kimchi and sauerkraut).
To our knowledge, this article illustrates the first approach to applying SSF technology with a LAB strain to extract bioactive components from oregano by-products. Additionally, this study aimed to investigate the influence on phenolic content and profile as well as potential bioactivities (antioxidant capacity and enzymatic and microbial inhibitions) of extracts from L. graveolens by-products after SSF by L. mesenteroides.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

The present study applied chemical reagents (analytical grade) such as Ethanol (absolute), distilled water, gallic acid (>98.5%), quercetin (≥95%), 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,4,6-Tripyridyl-s-triazine (TPTZ, ≥98%), Tween 80, Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, sodium carbonate anhydrous (Na2CO3, ≥99.5%), sodium hydroxide (NaOH, ≥99.7%), sodium nitrite (NaNO2, ≥97.0%), aluminum chloride (AlCl3, 98%), hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37%), and ammonia ferric sulfate dodecahydrate ([FeNH4(SO4)2 · 12 H2O], ≥99%) and biological reagents as dextrose (>97.5%), α-amylase (A3306), and MRS agar. All the reagents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Toluca, México). The L. mesenteroides (18C6) strain was provided by the Food Research Department collection from the Autonomous University of Coahuila.

2.2. Plant Material

The mature leaves from oregano plants were harvested (August–October 2020) from “Ejido 4 de Marzo” (Latitude, 25°33′49.5380″ N, Longitude, 102°33′59.0388″ O in Parras de la Fuente, Coahuila, Mexico). A cleaning step (distilled water) was applied to remove dirt, followed by a drying step in the oven (50 °C, 24 h).

2.3. EOs Extraction Process

The hydro-distillation system involves putting 100 g of cleaned oregano leaves and 1000 mL of water into a flat-bottom ball flask of 1 L (Extraction time = 1 h); the spent leaves (by-product) are dried in the oven (50 °C, 24 h) for stabilization and stored in dark bags until the SSF process.

2.4. Solid-State Fermentation Process

The bioprocessing was carried out in a glass flask functioning as a bioreactor (250 mL), the fermentation substrate was the spent leaves of L. graveolens using a unique inoculum size (1 × 107 cells g−1 of the substrate), with a 90% moisture level, and a temperature of 37 °C. The fermentation was carried out for 120 h (sampling time: 24 h); the recovery of fermented extracts was accomplished via mechanical extraction (10 mL distilled water) using a press system (syringe 20 mL, BD Plastipak™, Becton Dickinson, CDMX, Mexico), the recovered extracts were filtered (0.22 μm, Millex®-GS, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and stored in the dark at −20 °C temperature until use.

2.5. Polyphenolic Compounds Evaluation in the Solid-State Fermentation Process (SSF)

2.5.1. Phenolic Compounds Determination

Total Polyphenolic Compounds (TPC)

The total polyphenolic compounds in the fermented extracts from SSF were determined using the methodology proposed by Georgé et al. [33] for hydrolyzed tannins and the condensed tannins methodology, according to Amaya-Chantaca et al. [34]. The results were reported as total polyphenolic compounds in milligrams per oregano by-product gram (mg TPC/g oregano).

Hydrolyzed Tannins (Folin–Ciocalteu)

The Folin–Ciocalteu assay determined the total polyphenol concentration (electron transfer method). In a 96-well microplate, 25 µL of the sample, 25 µL of the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, and 25 µL of sodium carbonate (0.7 M) were added, followed by a homogenization and incubation step (40 °C, 30 min). After that, 200 µL of distilled H2O was added, and the absorbance was measured at 750 nm (UV-visible Epoch™ Microplate Spectrophotometer). The results were expressed as gallic acid milligram equivalent per oregano gram (mg GAE/g) according to linear regression (calibration curve).

Condensed Tannins (HCl–Butanol)

The HCl–butanol method was applied to the quantification of condensed tannins, it was carried out according to Swain and Hillis [35] with slight modifications. A sample volume of 500 μL was mixed with 3 mL of HCl:butanol (1:9) and 1 mL of ferric reagent. The reaction mix was incubated at 100 °C (1 h), and the final absorbance was measured at 460 nm (UV-visible Epoch™ Microplate Spectrophotometer). The results were expressed as the catechin milligram equivalent per gram (mg CE/g) according to the calibration curve.

Total Flavonoid Compounds (TFC)

The quantification was determined according to De la Rosa et al. [36]. An initial volume of 31 μL (sample) was mixed with 9.3 μL of sodium nitrite (5%, w/v) and 9.3 μL of distilled water. The solution was mixed and incubated at 40 °C (3 min). Then, 9.3 μL of 10% (w/v) aluminum chloride was added and incubated (3 min). Finally, 125 μL of sodium hydroxide (0.5 M) was added and incubated at 40 °C (30 min) in the dark. The final absorbance was measured at 510 nm (UV-visible Epoch™ Microplate Spectrophotometer). The results were reported as the milligram equivalent of catechin per oregano gram (mg CE/g) according to a calibration curve prepared with the same standard.

2.6. Antioxidant Activity in the Solid-State Fermentation Process (SSF)

2.6.1. DPPH Radical Scavenging Assay

The methodology was carried out according to Brand-Williams et al. [37]; a working solution of DPPH radical (60 mM) was diluted in methanol. A working volume of 295 µL (DPPH radical) was added to each 5 µL of the sample, followed by incubation (30 min) at room temperature. The final absorbance was determined at 517 nm (UV-visible Epoch™ Microplate Spectrophotometer), and the results were expressed as the milligram equivalent of gallic acid per gram of sample (mg GAE/g oregano).

2.6.2. Ferric Reducing Capacity (FRAP)

The FRAP assay was conducted according to Delgado-Andrade et al. [38] with some modifications. The FRAP reagent was prepared by mixing 2 mL of TPTZ (10 mM) diluted in HCl (40 mM) + 2 mL (FeCl3‚20 mM) + 20 mL of acetate buffer (0.3 M, pH 3.6).
The FRAP reagent was mixed with 10 µL of the sample or standard (Trolox). The reaction mix was incubated (15 min) at room temperature in darkness. The absorbance was read at 593 nm (UV-visible Epoch™ Microplate Spectrophotometer); the results were expressed as the milligram equivalent of Trolox per gram of oregano (mg Trolox/g oregano).

2.7. Inhibitory Activity of Extracts against α-Amylase

The α-amylase inhibition was tested according to Chen et al. [39] with slight modifications, using acarbose (1 mg/mL) (control +) and buffer (control −).
A volume of 20 μL of the extracts was mixed and incubated with 20 μL α-amylase (10 U/mL in 0.02M pH 6.9, phosphate buffer), and the mix was incubated for 45 min (37 °C). Then, 40 μL of starch (2%, w/v) was added and incubated for 5 min. Finally, 200 μL of DNS reagent was added to stop the reaction and boiling (10 min). The absorbance was determined at 540 nm (UV-visible Epoch™ Microplate Spectrophotometer).
The inhibition of α-amylase was calculated according to the following Equation (1):
Inhibition α-amylase (%) = [((ACa − Ac) − (ASa − As))/(ACa − Ac)] × 100
where Aca and Asa were the absorbances of buffer and samples mixed with α-amylase, and AC and AS were the absorbances without α-amylase.

2.8. Antimicrobial Activity via Agar Diffusion Assay (ADA)

The antimicrobial activity was determined against a relevant bacterial strain in the food industry (Escherichia coli, Food Research Department, Chemistry School, Autonomous University of Coahuila) via the Agar Diffusion Assay (ADA), following the methodology proposed by Avaiyarasi et al. [40], with some modifications. A TSAYE agar (Tryptone Soy Yeast Extract Agar) was seeded with 1 × 108 cells/mL. Once the agar was solidified, 8 mm holes were punched; 50 μL of each fermented extract was added to each well. The experiments were incubated (37 °C, 24 h), and clear zones around the wells were measured to calculate the antimicrobial activity, which was expressed as inhibition diameter (mm).

2.9. RP-HPLC-ESI-MS Analysis of Extracts

The analysis using high-performance liquid chromatography was carried out using a Varian HPLC system, which includes an autosampler (Varian ProStar 410, Varian Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA), a ternary pump (Varian ProStar 230I, Varian Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA), and a PDA detector (Varian ProStar 330, Varian Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA), as well as a liquid chromatograph ion trap mass spectrometer (Varian 500-MS IT Mass Spectrometer, Varian Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with an electrospray ion source.
The analytical method was applied according to Ascacio-Valdés et al. [41]. A 5 µL sample was injected into a Denali C18 column (150 mm × 2.1 mm, 3 µm, Grace, Columbia, MD, USA) at 30 °C. The mobile pashes were formic acid (0.2%, v/v; solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B). All MS experiments were carried out in the negative mode [M − H]−1 in a full scan mode acquired in the m/z range 50–2000.
The data were collected (MS Workstation software, V 6.9), and phenolic compounds were identified by comparing the retention time of the HPLC analysis with MS with the literature and the database of the Food Research Department from Autonomous University of Coahuila (DIA-UAdeC).

2.10. Statistical Analysis

The experiments were conducted in triplicate, and results were reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD). SPPS Software (IBM® SPSS Statistics) was used as the statistical program to develop a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s HSD Test with α = 0.05. Figure 1 provides a general diagram of the analytical process.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Phenolic Compounds

The results showed a statistical difference in the total polyphenolic content through the SSF process, the greater release of polyphenolic compounds after the application of L. mesenteroides was shown at 72 h with an increase of 0.60 times compared to time zero (Figure 2A). The increment is within the ranges of polyphenol increases reported using (0.25 to 2 times) LAB strains in other matrices (e.g., cereals) [42,43]. Similarly, the increase in total flavonoids was quantified at 2.55-times greater than at the initial time (Figure 2B) at 96 h of the SSF process; our result is higher than the values reported by Hwang et al. [31] with a strain of L. mesenteroides in ginseng (2.17 times). The increment in phenolic compounds concentration by L. mesenteroides strains has been previously observed in a garlic–Cirsium setidens Nakai blend with remarkable findings with an increase in total phenolic compounds (27.81 ± 0.34 gGAE/g) and flavonoids (33.80 ± 0.44 gQE/g) related mainly with the LAB enzymes [38]. It has been reported that LAB produces enzymes capable of releasing bioactive compounds such as tannase, β-glucosidase, and feruloyl esterase [32,44]. A study carried out by Lee et al. [45] reported that L. mesenteroides was capable of producing β-glucosidase that changes the flavonoid composition and the liberation of aglycones forms with major bioactive activity.
Also, the enzymes may be capable of hydrolyzing the β-glucosidic linkages and liberating the biomolecules from cell wax with the combination of other enzymes with the capacity to hydrolyze other plant cell wall components (esterase). Otherwise, there are changes in flavonoid structures from the metabolism of L. mesenteroides; it has been reported that L. mesenteroides has the potential to express glucan sucrase enzymes involved in the glycosylation of flavonoids in the fermentation process (ex., glucosides from quercetin, luteolin, myricetin, and fisetin, among others) [46,47,48]. Thus, glycosylation may promote the solubility of aglycone forms of flavonoids and benefit the extraction of higher quantities of bioactive molecules in water.
However, higher concentrations of phenolic compounds could have a negative impact on microorganisms (LAB). As a response, some mechanism for detoxification of the environment could be promoted [49]. This behavior has been previously reported in LAB-fermented Chinese chives (Allium tuberosum) [50] and, recently, in avocado leaves fermented by L. mesenteroides 21, where the concentration of Folin–Ciocalteu reacting substances (e.g., polyphenols) suffered a reduction after 72 h that could be explained by a possible degradation of biotransformation (phenolic acid decarboxylase and reductase, among others) into reduced forms [51].

3.2. Antioxidant Activity

The antioxidant activity (Figure 3) is related to the content of polyphenolic compounds; the data showed an increment through fermentation; the DPPH radical assay showed the potential of the extract to inhibit an oxidative radical, and the highest activity against the radical was recorded at 96 h up to 2.51-times higher than at the initial time point. The iron-reducing power assay (FRAP) showed a similar behavior where, in the first hours of fermentation, the antioxidant activity was lower than after the SSF process. The highest value was obtained at 120 h (3.01-times higher), but it is statistically similar to the extract recovered at 96 h. The increment in antioxidant activity can be related to the extraction of polyphenolic compounds via the SSF process and the enzymes involved in it. Also, in literature, L. mesenteroides has been associated with the production of secondary metabolites with antioxidant properties; Lee et al. [52] reported the production of four amino acid derivatives with the level of antioxidant activity that could be produced in our study. Similarly, Zhang et al. [53] reported the production of an exopolysaccharide with antioxidant activity that could be produced in the SSF process.

3.3. Antimicrobial Activity

The fermentation extracts showed antimicrobial activity (Table 1) against E. coli; the greatest level of inhibition belonged to the 96 h sample of the SSF process with an inhibition diameter of 12.06 ± 2.66 mm, which may correspond to the time point with a high quantity of polyphenolic compounds. In addition, not only the polyphenol release may explain the activity, but because the production of antimicrobial peptides in LAB has been reported, the bacteriocins could interact negatively with the membrane of pathogenic bacteria, generating disruption, hindering protein transit, and leading the cell to death [54]. Specifically, in the literature, the expression of genes of two antimicrobial peptides (hymenoptaecin and apidaecin) has been reported for L. mesenteroides (TBE-8) that could provide antimicrobial activity [55]. Otherwise, the fermented extract obtained at 120 h of fermentation showed a strong reduction in the antimicrobial activity, a possible explanation could be related to the absence of a chemical antimicrobial component (see Section 3.5, Ferulic acid), and, also, the enzymatic process applied in the SSF may produce an extract with higher sugar content that could reduce the antimicrobial potential of the extract. In the literature, there is a precedent reported by Molet-Rodríguez et al. [56] that the integration of bioactive molecules (e.g., essential oils) into food products (complex matrix) involves a complex balance, due to the presence of nutrients (fructose, sucrose, and glucose) that could help bacteria to reduce the negative impacts of natural antimicrobial components.
It is important to note that none of the extracts showed activity greater than the positive control with tetracycline at a standard concentration of 1 mg/mL (22.36 ± 0.55 mM). On the other hand, it could be possible to increase the antimicrobial activity by concentrating the crude extract of the fermentation.

3.4. Potential α-Amylase Inhibition

The findings reported that the extract from fermentation has a light inhibition of α-amylase (Table 1). The highest valuer was reported for the 120 h (14.10 ± 0.45%) sample and correlated with the time at which there was the highest concentration of flavonoids. Flavonoids have been reported as molecules with potential as inhibitors of α-amylase by binding to proteins via hydrogen bonds [57,58,59].
The inhibition values were lower than the positive control (acarbose) with a value of 94.07 ± 2.6%; but it is reported that higher inhibition of α-amylase might cause diarrhea, flatulence, and abdominal pain due to bacterial fermentation by intestinal bacteria [60,61]. Our data suggest that oregano by-products could be a source of compounds with the capacity for α-amylase inhibition.

3.5. RP-HPLC-ESI-MS Analysis

The HPLC-MS analysis of extracts before the solid-state fermentation process (0 h) revealed six compounds (Table 2); a total of two identified compounds have been previously reported in other works for oregano varieties. For example, caffeic acid and medioresinol have been reported in oregano varieties [62,63]. Caffeic acid has been reported as an antioxidant component with antimicrobial activity against pathogens (Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, among others) [64]. Also, medioresinol was associated with the capacity to act synergistically with antibiotics in bacterial infection and the capacity to act as an auxiliary to prevent pyroptosis of endothelial cells in ischemic stroke [65,66]. Four compounds have not been related to oregano species but contain metabolites with potential bioactivities present in plants that could be synthesizes by oregano plants (5-nonadecylresorcinol, sinensetin, phlorin, and petunidin 3-O-(6″-acetyl-glucoside)): for example, sinensetin is a novel compound with numerous bioactivities (anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-obesity, anti-dementia, vasorelaxant, and antitrypanosomal activities) that could be exploited by the food and pharmaceutical industry [67].
The SSF process enriched the fermentation extracts with the release of 13 compounds (7–19) shown in Table 2; the liberation of different polyphenols through fermentation may be the result of LAB enzymes capable of degrading the cell wall (tannase, β-glucosidase and feruloyl esterase) [32,44,52]. Among the released bioactive compounds, the enriched extracts highlight their interesting bioactivities with potential in industry; for example, the SSF releases gardenin B (24 h), a methoxylated flavonoid with novel health benefits, that showed a cytotoxic effect as an apoptotic inducer against human leukemia cell lines (HL-60 and U-937) [68]. Recently, gardenin B was reported as a promising antiviral auxiliary with the capacity to attach with the SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) [69]. Another novel compound is trachelogenin (48 h), a lignan with relevant health activities; for example, Moura et al. [70] associated it with in vitro antitumor capacity via induction of cell death, with the formation of autophagosomes and cytoplasmic vacuolization. Also, an inhibited interaction between trachelogenin and hepatitis C virus glycoprotein and the host entry factor (CD81) [71] has been demonstrated. The other compounds (kaempferol, quercetin, ferulic acid, and tangeretin, among others) have been associated with beneficial activities such as antioxidant, antimicrobial, antiviral, etc. [72,73,74]. Thus, the bioactive compounds released in the extracts comprise bioactive molecules with highlighted bioactivities for the food and pharmaceutical industries.
The data shown in Table 2 could be used for relating the bioactivities obtained with the compounds found in the extracts; the ability to inhibit α-amylase could rest in the presence of sinensetin and medioresinol, the potential of which was determined in previous works [75,76]. Furthermore, the antimicrobial potential against E. coli could be related to the presence of chemical molecules like caffeic acid 4-O-glucoside, resveratrol 3-O-glucoside, sinensetin, and ferulic acid, which have been related with this activity in the literature [77,78,79]. Also, the potential synergetic effect between the chemical compounds could be responsible for the higher antimicrobial activity reported at 96 h; for example, Skroza et al. [80] demonstrated positive interactions between resveratrol and ferulic acid, showing a decrease in the MIC (Minimum inhibitory concentration) value from 2500 micromolar to 1250 micromolar (molar ratio 1:1); both compounds could be found in the SSF extracts.

4. Conclusions

This research article highlights important insights concerning evidence of the hidden bioactive compounds and potential bioactivity of oregano by-products subjected to SSF technology. Our findings from bioprocessing using L. mesenteroides increase the current efforts looking for novel sustainable processing lines under circular economy trends. Also, the application of SSF with L. mesenteroides increases the extraction of total polyphenolic compounds (0.60 times) and flavonoids (2.55) as compared to the initial time point. The extracts showed a potential inhibitory capacity against a-amylase (14.10 ± 0.45%) that could be explored as a possible auxiliary in glucose control. Also, the extracts showed antibacterial capacity against E. coli (12.06 ± 2.66, 96 h) that could be explored for product development. The HPLC-MS analysis determined that SSF releases compounds of interest not found before fermentation (0 h) such as gardenin B, trachelogenin, ferulic acid, and resveratrol 3-O-glucoside.
Finally, applying LAB in an SSF process comprises a potential alternative for recovering bioactive extracts from Mexican oregano residues, which may trigger their use as raw materials to develop industrial bioproducts. Additionally, the following studies will be guided in evaluating residual fermented biomass, which could be a novel fermented vegetable food product.
Also, exploiting Mexican resources will bring value to the region while minimizing environmental impact by applying bioprocessing tools. However, more studies are needed to understand the bacterial mechanism involved in the liberation of polyphenols and the possible biotransformation that biomolecules may suffer via LAB metabolism.

Author Contributions

I.B.-H. conceived and designed the idea and wrote the manuscript; R.G.-G., G.C.G.M.-Á. and C.T.-L. wrote and reviewed the manuscript; C.N.A. and M.L.C.-G. conceived and designed the idea and wrote and reviewed the manuscript and conducted language revision for the final versions of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

To CONACYT, for the support of the scholarship granted (777755) to I.B.-H.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Van Hoof, B.; Solano, A.; Riano, J.; Mendez, C.; Medaglia, A. Decision-making for circular economy implementation in agri-food systems: A transdisciplinary case study of cacao in Colombia. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 434, 140307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Papamichael, I.; Voukkali, I.; Loizia, P.; Stylianou, M.; Economou, F.; Vardopoulos, I.; Klontza, E.E.; Lekkas, D.F.; Zorpas, A.A. Measuring Circularity: Tools for monitoring a smooth transition to Circular Economy. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2023, 36, 101330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Galván Calamaco, Z.; Ramos Clamont Montfort, G.; Marszalek, J.E.; Vargas González, G. Revisión Sobre El orégano Mexicano Lippia graveolens HBK. (Sinonimia Lippia berlandieri Schauer) Y Su Aceite Esencial. Investig. Desarro. Cienc. Tecnol. Aliment. 2023, 8, 861–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Comisión Nacional Forestal. Paquete Tecnológico para la Producción de Orégano (Lippia spp.), 1st ed.; CONAFOR: Zapopan, Mexico, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  5. El Diario de Chihuahua. Available online: https://diario.mx/estado/2016/jan/23/produce-chihuahua-mil-toneladas-de-oregano-al-ano-586440.html (accessed on 29 July 2024).
  6. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Available online: https://www.gob.mx/inifap/articulos/domesticacion-del-oregano-para-zonas-semideserticas-de-coahuila (accessed on 29 July 2024).
  7. Secretariat of Economy. Data Mexico. Available online: https://www.economia.gob.mx/datamexico/en/profile/product/essential-oils-perfumes-cosmetics-toiletries?tradeBalanceSelector=2013&timeNetTradeSelector=Year (accessed on 29 July 2024).
  8. Orona, I.; Salvador, A.J.; Espinoza, J.J.; Vázquez, C. Collection and marketing of oregano (Lippia spp.) in the Mexican semi-desert, a case study of the Sierra and Canyon Municipal Ecological Reserve of Jimulco, Mexico. Rev. Mex. Agronegocios 2017, 41, 684–695. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bautista-Hernández, I.; Aguilar, C.N.; Martínez-Ávila, G.C.G.; Torres-León, C.; Ilina, A.; Flores-Gallegos, A.C.; Kumar-Verma, D.; Chávez-González, M.L. Mexican Oregano (Lippia graveolens Kunth) as Source of Bioactive Compounds: A Review. Molecules 2021, 26, 5156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dina, E.; Vontzalidou, A.; Cheilari, A.; Bagatzounis, P.; Agapidou, E.; Giannenas, I.; Grigoriadou, K.; Aligiannis, N. Sustainable Use of Greek Herbs By-Products, as an Alternative Source of Biologically Active Ingredients for Innovative Products. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 867666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bautista-Hernández, I.; Aguilar, C.N.; Martínez-Ávila, G.C.; Ilina, A.; Torres-León, C.; Verma, D.K.; Chávez-González, M.L. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of Lippia graveolens Kunth residual leaves fermented by two filamentous fungal strains in solid-state process. Food Bioprod. Process. 2022, 136, 24–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. García-Pérez, E.; Castro-Álvarez, F.F.; Gutiérrez-Uribe, J.A.; García-Lara, S. Revisión de la producción, composición fitoquímica y propiedades nutracéuticas del orégano mexicano. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agrícolas 2012, 3, 339–353. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hrncic, M.K.; Cor, D.; Simonovska, J.; Knez, Z.; Kavrakovski, Z.; Rafajlovska, V. Extraction Techniques and Analytical Methods for Characterization of Active Compounds in Origanum Species. Molecules 2020, 25, 4735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Timothy, C.N.; Priya, V.V.; Gayathri, G.R. Phytochemical analysis and total phenolic content of Origanum vulgare (oregano). Drug Invent. Today 2018, 10, 10. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cid-Pérez, T.S.; Ávila-Sosa, R.; Ochoa-Velasco, C.E.; Rivera-Chavira, B.E.; Nevárez-Moorillón, G.V. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of Mexican oregano (Poliomintha longiflora) essential oil, hydrosol and extracts from waste solid residues. Plants 2019, 8, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Teigiserova, D.A.; Bourgine, J.; Thomsen, M. Closing the loop of cereal waste and residues with sustainable technologies: An overview of enzyme production via fungal solid-state fermentation. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 27, 845–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lizardi-Jiménez, M.A.; Hernández-Martínez, R. Solid state fermentation (SSF): Diversity of applications to valorize waste and biomass. Biotech 2017, 7, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Manan, M.A.; Webb, C. Modern microbial solid state fermentation technology for future biorefineries for the production of added-value products. Biofuel J. 2017, 16, 730–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Venil, C.K.; Yusof, N.Z.B.; Ahmad, W.A. Solid State Fermentation Utilizing Agro-Industrial Waste for Microbial Pigment Production. In Sustainable Agriculture towards Food Security; Dhanarajan, A., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sadh, P.K.; Duhan, S.; Duhan, J.S. Agro-industrial wastes and their utilization using solid-state fermentation: A review. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2018, 5, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Torres-león, C.; Ramirez-Guzman, N.; Ascacio-valdes, J.; Serna-Cock, L.; Santos, M.T.; Contreras-Esquivel, J.C.; Aguilar, C.N. Solid-state fermentation with Aspergillus niger to enhance the phenolic contents and antioxidative activity of Mexican mango seed: A promising source of natural antioxidants. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 112, 108236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Behera, S.S.; Ray, R.C. Solid state fermentation for production of microbial cellulases: Recent advances and improvement strategies. Macromolecules 2016, 86, 656–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Dhull, S.B.; Punia, S.; Kidwai, M.K.; Kaur, M.; Chawla, P.; Purewal, S.S.; Sangwan, M.; Palthania, S. Solid-state fermentation of lentil (Lens culinaris L.) with Aspergillus awamori: Effect on phenolic compounds, mineral content, and their bioavailability. Legume Sci. 2020, 2, e37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. De León-Medina, J.C.; Sepúlveda, L.; Morlett-Cháve, J.; Meléndez-Renteria, P.; Zugasti-Cruz, A.; Ascacio-Valdés, J.; Aguilar, C.N. Solid-State Fermentation with Aspergillus niger GH1 to Enhance Polyphenolic Content and Antioxidative Activity of Castilla Rose (Purshia plicata). Plants 2020, 9, 1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Darvishi, N.; Fard, N.A.; Sadrnia, M. Genomic and proteomic comparisons of bacteriocins in probiotic species Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium and inhibitory ability of Escherichia coli MG 1655. Biotechnol. Rep. 2021, 31, e00654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bartkiene, E.; Krungleviciute, V.; Juodeikiene, G.; Vidmantiene, D.; Maknickiene, Z. Solid state fermentation with lactic acid bacteria to improve the nutritional quality of lupin and soya bean. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2015, 95, 1336–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hadj-Saadoun, J.; Calani, L.; Cirlini, M.; Bernini, V.; Neviani, E.; del Rio, D.; Galaverna, G.; Lazzi, C. Effect of fermentation with single and co-culture of lactic acid bacteria on okara: Evaluation of bioactive compounds and volatile profiles. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 3033–3043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Roasa, J.; de Villa, R.; Mine, Y.; Tsao, R. Phenolics of cereal, pulse and oilseed processing by-products and potential effects of solid-state fermentation on their bioaccessibility, bioavailability and health benefits: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 116, 954–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Khan, S.A.; Liu, L.; Lai, T.; Zhang, R.; Wei, Z.; Xiao, J.; Deng, Y.; Zhang, M. Phenolic profile, free amino acids composition and antioxidant potential of dried longan fermented by lactic acid bacteria. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 4782–4791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Garcia, C.; Guerin, M.; Souidi, K.; Remize, F. Lactic fermented fruit or vegetable juices: Past, present and future. Beverages 2020, 6, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hwang, J.E.; Kim, K.-T.; Paik, H.-D. Improved Antioxidant, Anti-inflammatory, and Anti-adipogenic Properties of Hydroponic Ginseng Fermented by Leuconostoc mesenteroides KCCM 12010P. Molecules 2019, 24, 3359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fessard, A.; Kapoor, A.; Patche, J.; Assemat, S.; Hoarau, M.; Bourdon, E.; Bahorun, T.; Remize, F. Lactic fermentation as an efficient tool to enhance the antioxidant activity of tropical fruit juices and teas. Microorganisms 2017, 5, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Georgé, S.; Brat, P.; Alter, P.; AmIot, M.J. Rapid determination of polyphenols and vitamin C in plant-derived products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 1370–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Amaya-Chantaca, D.; Flores-Gallegos, A.C.; Iliná, A.; Aguilar, C.N.; Sepúlveda-Torre, L.; Ascacio-Vadlés, J.A.; Chavez-González, M.L. Comparative extraction study of grape pomace bioactive compounds by submerged and solid-state fermentation. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2021, 97, 1494–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Swain, T.; Hillis, E. The phenolic constituents of Prunus domestica. The quantitative analysis of phenolic constituents. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1959, 10, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. De la Rosa, L.A.; Vazquez-Flores, A.A.; Alvarez-Parrilla, E.; Rodrigo-García, J.; Medina-Campos, O.N.; Ávila-Nava, A.; González-Reyes, S.; Pedraza-Chaverri, J. Content of major classes of polyphenolic compounds, antioxidant, antiproliferative, and cell protective activity of pecan crude extracts and their fractions. J. Funct. Foods 2014, 7, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, M.E.; Berset, C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 28, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Delgado-Andrade, C.; Rufián-Henares, J.A.; Morales, F.J. Assessing the antioxidant activity of melanoidins from coffee brews by different antioxidant methods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 7832–7836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chen, P.H.; Weng, Y.M.; Yu, Z.R.; Koo, M.; Wang, B.J. Extraction temperature affects the activities of antioxidation, carbohydrate-digestion enzyme and antiogestin-converting enzyme of Pleurotus citrinopileatus extract. J. Food Drug Anal. 2016, 24, 548–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Avaiyarasi, N.D.; Ravindran, A.D.; Venkatesh, P.; Arul, V. In vitro selection, characterization, and cytotoxic effect of bacteriocin of Lactobacillus sakei GM3 isolated from goat milk. Food Control 2016, 69, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ascacio-Valdés, J.A.; Aguilera-Carbó, A.F.; Buenrostro, J.J.; Prado-Barragán, A.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R.; Aguilar, C.N. The complete biodegradation pathway of ellagitannins by Aspergillus niger in solid-state fermentation. J. Basic Microbiol. 2016, 56, 329–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Sawangwan, T.; Porncharoennop, C.; Nimrasksa, H. Antioxidant compounds from rice bran fermentation by lactic acid bacteria. Agric. Food 2021, 6, 578–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, L.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, H.; Qu, G.; Chun, L.; Liu, L. Biotransformation of Polyphenols in Apple Pomace Fermented by Glucosidase-Producing Lactobacillus rhamnosus L08. Foods 2021, 10, 1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Herreros, M.A.; Fresno, J.M.; González Prieto, M.J.; Tornadijo, M.E. Technological characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Armada cheese (a Spanish goats’ milk cheese). Int. Dairy J. 2003, 13, 469–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lee, Y.G.; Cho, J.Y.; Kim, Y.M.; Moon, J.H. Change in Flavonoid Composition and Antioxidative Activity during Fermentation of Onion (Allium cepa L.) by Leuconostoc mesenteroides with Different Salt Concentrations. J. Food Sci. 2016, 81, C1385–C1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bertrand, A.; Morel, S.; Lefoulon, F.; Rolland, Y.; Monsan, P.; Remaud-Simeon, M. Leuconostoc mesenteroides glucansucrase synthesis of flavonoid glucosides by acceptor reactions in aqueous-organic solvents. Carbohydr. Res. 2006, 341, 855–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Huynh, N.T.; van Camp, J.; Smagghe, G.; Raes, K. Improved release and metabolism of flavonoids by steered fermentation processes: A review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 19369–19388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Moon, Y.; Kim, H.; Gil, C.; Park, C.; Wook, S.; Kim, D. Enzyme and Microbial Technology Biochemical characterization of synthesized fisetin glucoside by dextransucrase from Leuconostoc mesenteroides NRRL B-1299CB4 with enhanced water solubility. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2022, 161, 110111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Miyagusuku-Cruzado, G.; García-Cano, I.; Rocha-Mendoza, D.; Jiménez-Flores, R.; Giusti, M.M. Monitoring Hydroxycinnamic Acid Decarboxylation by Lactic Acid Bacteria Using High-Throughput UV-Vis Spectroscopy. Molecules 2020, 25, 3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Hong, H.; Niu, K.M.; Lee, J.H.; Cho, S.; Han, S.G.; Kim, S.K. Characteristics of Chinese chives (Allium tuberosum) fermented by Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2016, 59, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. De Montijo-Prieto, S.; Razola-Díaz, M.d.C.; Barbieri, F.; Tabanelli, G.; Gardini, F.; Jiménez-Valera, M.; Ruiz-Bravo, A.; Verardo, V.; Gómez-Caravaca, A.M. Impact of Lactic Acid Bacteria Fermentation on Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Avocado Leaf Extracts. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lee, Y.G.; Cho, J.Y.; Moon, J.H. Isolation and antioxidative activity of amino acid derivatives produced by Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2016, 25, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zhang, Q.; Wang, J.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, S.M.; Sun, X.Y.; Li, C.Y.; Zheng, M.X.; Xiang, W.L.; Tang, J. Characterization and Antioxidant Activity of Released Exopolysaccharide from Potential Probiotic Leuconostoc mesenteroides LM187. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 31, 1144–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Baharin, N.H.; Khairil Mokhtar, N.F.; Mohd Desa, M.N.; Gopalsamy, B.; Mohd Zaki, N.N.; Yuswan, M.H.; Muthanna, A.; Dzaraly, N.D.; Abbasiliasi, S.; Mohd Hashim, A.; et al. The characteristics and roles of antimicrobial peptides as potential treatment for antibiotic-resistant pathogens: A review. PeerJ 2021, 9, e12193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Huang, Y.H.; Chen, Y.H.; Chen, J.H.; Hsu, P.S.; Wu, T.H.; Lin, C.F.; Peng, C.C.; Wu, M.C. A potential probiotic Leuconostoc mesenteroides TBE-8 for honey bee. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 18466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Molet-Rodríguez, A.; Turmo-Ibarz, A.; Salvia-Trujillo, L.; Martín-Belloso, O. Incorporation of antimicrobial nanoemulsions into complex foods: A case study in an apple juice-based beverage. Lwt 2021, 141, 110926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gutiérrez-Grijalva, E.P.; Antunes-Ricardo, M.; Acosta-Estrada, B.A.; Gutiérrez-Uribe, J.A.; Basilio Heredia, J. Cellular antioxidant activity and in vitro inhibition of α-glucosidase, α-amylase and pancreatic lipase of oregano polyphenols under simulated gastrointestinal digestion. Food Res. Int. 2019, 116, 676–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Zaynullin, R.A.; Kunakova, R.V.; Khusnutdinova, E.K.; Yalaev, B.; Segura-Ceniceros, E.P.; Chavez-Gonzalez, M.L.; Martínez-Hernández, J.L.; Gernet, M.V.; Batashov, E.S.; Ilyina, A. Dihydroquercetin: Known antioxidant—New inhibitor of alpha-amylase activity. Med. Chem. Res. 2018, 27, 966–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Martinez-Gonzalez, A.I.; Díaz-Sánchez, A.G.; de la Rosa, L.A.; Bustos-Jaimes, I.; Alvarez-Parrilla, E. Inhibition of α-amylase by flavonoids: Structure activity relationship (SAR). Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2019, 206, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Fujisawa, T.; Ikegami, H.; Inoue, K.; Kawabata, Y.; Ogihara, T. Effect of two α-glucosidase inhibitors, voglibose and acarbose, on postprandial hyperglycemia correlates with subjective abdominal symptoms. Metab. Clin. Exp. 2005, 54, 387–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Tolmie, M.; Bester, M.J.; Apostolides, Z. Inhibition of α-glucosidase and α-amylase by herbal compounds for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: A validation of in silico reverse docking with in vitro enzyme assays. J. Diabetes 2021, 13, 779–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Irakli, M.; Skendi, A.; Bouloumpasi, E.; Chatzopoulou, P.; Biliaderis, C.G. LC-MS identification and quantification of phenolic compounds in solid residues from the essential oil industry. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Khorsand, G.; Morshedloo, M.R.; Mumivand, H.; Emami Bistgani, Z.; Maggi, F.; Khademi, A. Natural diversity in phenolic components and antioxidant properties of oregano (Origanum vulgare L.) accessions, grown under the same conditions. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 5813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sidoryk, K.; Jaromin, A.; Filipczak, N.; Cmoch, P.; Cybulski, M. Synthesis and antioxidant activity of caffeic acid derivatives. Molecules 2018, 23, 2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hwang, J.H.; Choi, H.; Hwang, I.S.; Kim, A.R.; Woo, E.R.; Lee, D.G. Synergistic antibacterial and antibiofilm effect between (+)-medioresinol and antibiotics in vitro. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2013, 170, 1934–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wang, Y.; Guan, X.; Gao, C.L.; Ruan, W.; Zhao, S.; Kai, G.; Li, F.; Pang, T. Medioresinol as a novel PGC-1α activator prevents pyroptosis of endothelial cells in ischemic stroke through PPARα-GOT1 axis. Pharmacol. Res. 2021, 169, 105640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Jie, L.; Jantan, I.; Yusoff, S.D.; Jalil, J.; Husain, K. Sinensetin: An Insight on Its Pharmacological Activities, Mechanisms of Action and Toxicity. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 11, 553404. [Google Scholar]
  68. Cabrera, J.; Saavedra, E.; del Rosario, H.; Perdomo, J.; Loro, J.F.; Cifuente, D.A.; Tonn, C.E.; García, C.; Quintana, J.; Estévez, F. Gardenin B-induced cell death in human leukemia cells involves multiple caspases but is independent of the generation of reactive oxygen species. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2016, 256, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Al-Karmalawy, A.A.; Farid, M.M.; Mostafa, A.; Ragheb, A.Y.; Mahmoud, S.H.; Shehata, M.; Abo Shama, N.M.; Gaballah, M.; Mostafa-Hedeab, G.; Marzouk, M.M. Naturally available flavonoid aglycones as potential antiviral drug candidates against SARS-CoV-2. Molecules 2021, 26, 6559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Moura, A.F.; Lima, K.S.B.; Sousa, T.S.; Marinho-Filho, J.D.B.; Pessoa, C.; Silveira, E.R.; Pessoa, O.D.L.; Costa-Lotufo, L.V.; Moraes, M.O.; Araújo, A.J. In vitro antitumor effect of a lignan isolated from Combretum fruticosum, trachelogenin, in HCT-116 human colon cancer cells. Toxicol. Vitr. 2018, 47, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Qian, X.J.; Jin, Y.S.; Chen, H.S.; Xu, Q.Q.; Ren, H.; Zhu, S.Y.; Tang, H.L.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, P.; Qi, Z.T.; et al. Trachelogenin, a novel inhibitor of hepatitis C virus entry through CD81. J. Gen. Virol. 2016, 97, 1134–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Wang, J.; Fang, X.; Ge, L.; Cao, F.; Zhao, L.; Wang, Z.; Xiao, W. Antitumor, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of kaempferol and its corresponding glycosides and the enzymatic preparation of kaempferol. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0197563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Dabeek, W.M.; Marra, M.V. Dietary quercetin and kaempferol: Bioavailability and potential cardiovascular-related bioactivity in humans. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Gao, Z.; Gao, W.; Zeng, S.L.; Li, P.; Liu, E.H. Chemical structures, bioactivities and molecular mechanisms of citrus polymethoxyflavones. J. Funct. Foods 2018, 40, 498–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mohamed, E.A.H.; Siddiqui, M.J.A.; Ang, L.F.; Sadikun, A.; Chan, S.H.; Tan, S.C.; Asmawi, M.Z.; Yam, M.F. Potent α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibitory activities of standardized 50% ethanolic extracts and sinensetin from Orthosiphon stamineus Benth as anti-diabetic mechanism. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2012, 12, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Timalsina, D.; Bhusal, D.; Devkota, H.P.; Pokhrel, K.P.; Sharma, K.R. α-Amylase Inhibitory Activity of Catunaregam spinosa (Thunb.) Tirveng.: In Vitro and in Silico Studies. BioMed Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 4133876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Berton, S.B.R.; Cabral, M.R.P.; de Jesus, G.A.M.; Sarragiotto, M.H.; Pilau, E.J.; Martins, A.F.; Bonafé, E.G.; Matsushita, M. Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography supports a new reaction mechanism between free radicals and ferulic acid with antimicrobial and antioxidant activities. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 154, 112701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Solís-Salas, L.M.; Sierra-Rivera, C.A.; Cobos-Puc, L.E.; Ascacio-Valdés, J.A.; Silva-Belmares, S.Y. Antibacterial potential by rupture membrane and antioxidant capacity of purified phenolic fractions of Persea americana leaf extract. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Ruan, X.; Deng, X.; Tan, M.; Yu, C.; Zhang, M.; Sun, Y.; Jiang, N. In vitro antibiofilm activity of resveratrol against avian pathogenic Escherichia coli. BMC Vet. Res. 2021, 17, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Skroza, D.; Simat, V.; Mozina, S.S.; Katalinic, V.; Boban, N.; Mekinic, I.G. Interactions of resveratrol with other phenolics and activity against food-borne pathogens. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 2312–2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. General process diagram of bioactive activity and chemical evaluation of Lippia graveolens by-product valorization through SSF process.
Figure 1. General process diagram of bioactive activity and chemical evaluation of Lippia graveolens by-product valorization through SSF process.
Agriculture 14 01342 g001
Figure 2. Polyphenolic compounds concentration in fermentative extracts obtained from SSF process using L. mesenteroides. (A) Total polyphenolic content (TPC) and (B) total flavonoid content (TFC). Different letters show significant differences (α = 0.05).
Figure 2. Polyphenolic compounds concentration in fermentative extracts obtained from SSF process using L. mesenteroides. (A) Total polyphenolic content (TPC) and (B) total flavonoid content (TFC). Different letters show significant differences (α = 0.05).
Agriculture 14 01342 g002
Figure 3. Antioxidant activity of fermentative extracts via the SSF process using L. mesenteroides; (A) FRAP assay and (B) DPPH assay. The different letters show significant differences (α = 0.05).
Figure 3. Antioxidant activity of fermentative extracts via the SSF process using L. mesenteroides; (A) FRAP assay and (B) DPPH assay. The different letters show significant differences (α = 0.05).
Agriculture 14 01342 g003
Table 1. Antimicrobial activity against E. coli and α-amylase inhibition of fermented extracts under SSF process using L. mesenteroides.
Table 1. Antimicrobial activity against E. coli and α-amylase inhibition of fermented extracts under SSF process using L. mesenteroides.
Fermentation Time (h)Bioactivities
Antimicrobial Activity (E. coli) Inhibition mmα-Amylase Inhibition (%)
03.3 ± 0.56 C3.24 ± 1.28 C
244.73 ± 1.3 C2.17 ± 1.28 C
482.96 ± 1.72 C4.22 ± 1.03 C
724.03 ± 0.45 C4.61 ± 1.27 C
9612.06 ± 2.66 B11.32 ± 3.7 B
1202.8 ± 0.1 C14.10 ± 0.45 B
Tetracycline (1 mg/mL)22.36 ± 0.55 A___
Acarbose (1 mg/mL)____94.07 ± 2.6 A
The letters show significant differences according to the comparison of means of all experiments (α = 0.05).
Table 2. Identified compounds via RP-HPLC-ESI-MS from the SSF of Mexican oregano by-products using L. mesenteroides.
Table 2. Identified compounds via RP-HPLC-ESI-MS from the SSF of Mexican oregano by-products using L. mesenteroides.
IDTentative Assignment[M − H] (m/z)ClassFermentation Time (h)
024487296120
1Caffeic acid 4-O-glucoside341.1Hydroxycinnamic acidsXXXX
25-nonadecylresorcino375.1AlkylphenolsXXX
3Medioresinol387.2LignansXXXXXX
4Sinensetin371.1MethoxyflavonesXXXXXX
5Phlorin287.1Other polyphenolsX
6Petunidin 3-O-(6″-acetyl-glucoside)520.4AnthocyaninsX
7Kaempferol 3-O-(2″-rhamnosyl-6″-acetyl-galactoside) 7-O-rhamnoside783.2Flavonols X
8Resveratrol 3-O-glucoside389.1Stilbenes XXXXX
9Gardenin B357.3Methoxyflavones X
103,4-DHPEA-EA377.1Tyrosols X
11Trachelogenin387.2Lignans X
12Quercetin 3-O-glucuronide447.1Flavonols X
13Phloretin273Dihydrochalcones XX
145-O-galloylquinic acid343.1Hydroxybenzoic acids X
15p-coumaroyl tyrosine327.2Hydroxycinnamic acids X
16Ferulic acid193.1Methoxycinnamic acids X
17Hydroxycaffeic acid195.1Hydroxycinnamic acids X
18Feruloyl glucose355.1Methoxycinnamic acids X
19Tangeretin1075Methoxyflavones X
The X represents the presence of the identified compounds at that time of fermentation. Blanks indicate the absence of the compounds at that time of fermentation.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bautista-Hernández, I.; Gómez-García, R.; Aguilar, C.N.; Martínez-Ávila, G.C.G.; Torres-León, C.; Chávez-González, M.L. Solid-State Fermentation for Phenolic Compounds Recovery from Mexican Oregano (Lippia graveolens Kunth) Residual Leaves Applying a Lactic Acid Bacteria (Leuconostoc mesenteroides). Agriculture 2024, 14, 1342. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14081342

AMA Style

Bautista-Hernández I, Gómez-García R, Aguilar CN, Martínez-Ávila GCG, Torres-León C, Chávez-González ML. Solid-State Fermentation for Phenolic Compounds Recovery from Mexican Oregano (Lippia graveolens Kunth) Residual Leaves Applying a Lactic Acid Bacteria (Leuconostoc mesenteroides). Agriculture. 2024; 14(8):1342. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14081342

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bautista-Hernández, Israel, Ricardo Gómez-García, Cristóbal N. Aguilar, Guillermo C. G. Martínez-Ávila, Cristian Torres-León, and Mónica L. Chávez-González. 2024. "Solid-State Fermentation for Phenolic Compounds Recovery from Mexican Oregano (Lippia graveolens Kunth) Residual Leaves Applying a Lactic Acid Bacteria (Leuconostoc mesenteroides)" Agriculture 14, no. 8: 1342. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14081342

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop