Next Article in Journal
Detection of Neonatal Calf Diarrhea Using Suckle Pressure and Machine Learning
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation and Analysis of Microbial Diversity in Rice Husk-Based Fermentation Bed Material
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of High Nitrogen Doses and Living Mulch on Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of Young Apple Trees (cv. ‘Sampion’)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

The Impact of Environmental Factors on the Quality of Horticultural Commodities

by
Grzegorz P. Łysiak
Department of Ornamental Plants, Dendrology and Pomology, University of Life Sciences in Poznan, Dąbrowskiego 159, 60-594 Poznan, Poland
Agriculture 2025, 15(17), 1829; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15171829
Submission received: 19 August 2025 / Accepted: 22 August 2025 / Published: 28 August 2025
The Sustainable Development Goals popularised by the United Nations include achieving food security, improving nutrition, eliminating hunger and poverty, promoting sustainable agriculture, and ensuring healthy lifestyles [1]. Limited access to safe and nutrient-rich foods increases the risk of malnutrition and hunger, and it can even cause mental imbalances. Horticultural production, as a branch of agriculture, is placing increasing emphasis on the sustainable development and biological balance of ecosystems. Without losing sight of this overarching goal, measures are being taken to ensure that crops are highly productive, high-quality, and environmentally friendly. All stages of horticultural activities, including cultivation, agrotechnical activities, distribution, storage, and preparation for consumption, have a direct impact on the quality, safety, and sustainability of crops, as well as their effects on human health. So far, the main goals of horticultural activity have been to increase the volume of production and improve commercial quality. The change in approach is also due to the fact that the intensive use of chemicals in agriculture has a negative impact on the environment, biodiversity, natural resources, and human health [1]. Research currently focuses on friendly production systems in which cultivation methods and techniques are strongly based on environmental conditions.
Another element with an increasingly disruptive impact on the growing ecosystem is climate change, which can largely limit the cultivation of many horticultural species or at least necessitate measures to support plants through changes in agricultural technology, protection, fertilisation, and cultivation systems [2,3]. Currently, the cultivation systems used often do not tolerate or poorly tolerate large fluctuations in temperature, rainfall, solar radiation, and violent winds. This is compounded by the enormous pressure of pathogens, which, due to their short development period and high multiplication rate, adapt more quickly to changing conditions. Horticultural production, which is an intensive form of production, is therefore under very strong pressure from climate change. In this field, researchers are currently focusing on reducing the impact of climate change through adapting plant cultivars or even introducing new species, making changes and improvements to the cultivation technologies used [4,5], enhancing protection, and introducing new ways of storing and processing horticultural products. Natural substances are increasingly being used to biostimulate transformations in plants and promote greater accumulation of health-promoting substances [6,7].
The popularisation of organic farming and agroecological approaches is conducive to reducing environmental changes [8]. This reduces dependence on chemicals in production and the harmful effects of chemical products on humans, animals, and the environment. Assessing the sensitivity or tolerance of plants to harmful substances found in the soil or air due to human activity is also a research topic that facilitates sustainable development [9]. Such a change in approach is also expected by consumers. Desirable methods include the breeding and selection of varieties with increased resistance to adverse factors, as well as activities that support the preservation of biodiversity, including the improvement of soil fertility with the use of natural resources and biofertilizers [10,11,12] and the stimulation of biological processes in the rhizosphere through crop rotation and organic [13,14] and living mulching [15,16]. With the aim of maintaining biodiversity and pro-environmental activities, natural biological preparations are being increasingly used for plant protection and controlled plant nutrition is being used in fertilisation. Research is also focusing on developing strategies to monitor pests and diseases, which minimises excessive pesticide use. Additionally, innovations in integrated technology increase environmental safety and balance horticultural production. Newly introduced species are of particular interest to breeders. Self-pollinating cultivars are sought after in order to obtain high yields with high-quality fruit [17]. One of the most important features of new cultivars is their qualitative assessment and storability [18]. For the storage of horticultural products, in order to maintain high quality, a controlled atmosphere (KA) in cold stores is increasingly used. Modified Atmosphere Packaging (MAP) is also used to store products, along with additional substances to delay ripening [19,20].
Monitoring and adapting to changes are also possible through the use of increasingly sophisticated risk assessment methods, growth rate assessment, and monitoring the types of changes in a plant [5,12,21]. Factors affecting the accumulation and stability of health-promoting substances in fruits and vegetables, as well as edible flowers, have been studied [22,23]. Mathematical patterns are increasingly being developed to assess growth rates and simulate possible processes or plant behaviour, increasingly supported by the use of artificial intelligence [21].
Like other food products, horticultural products offered to consumers should be high-quality and, above all, safe for consumption. Each stage from farm to fork must be subject to procedures that ensure that the relevant quality requirements are met. Fruit, vegetables, edible flowers, and other horticultural goods must meet the highest quality standards, which, according to the literature, comprise sensory quality, health-promoting properties, and their availability, as well as symbolic quality.
Horticultural production is one of the fastest changing branches of agriculture. Regardless of where it is conducted, new challenges are being faced. The main factors necessitating changes, apart from environmental considerations, are the growing requirements of consumers, who not only expect an aesthetically appealing product but also high nutritional value, an abundance of health-promoting substances, and environmentally friendly production methods. Due to the complexity of this problem, the following question arises: how can results be achieved that satisfy the producer, the consumer, and the trade? The papers published in this Special Issue attempt to address some relevant questions by modifying cultivation technology and horticultural product handling procedures at every stage, from production to their preparation for sale and consumption, ensuring that the growing demands of consumers are met to the greatest extent possible.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. What are the Sustainable Development Goals? United Nations Development Programme. Available online: https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals (accessed on 10 August 2025).
  2. Raju, C.; Pazhanivelan, S.; Perianadar, I.V.; Kaliaperumal, R.; Sathyamoorthy, N.K.; Sendhilvel, V. Climate Change as an Existential Threat to Tropical Fruit Crop Production—A Review. Agriculture 2024, 14, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Danko, R.; Pavloušek, P.; Kapłan, M.; Klimek, K.E. Conception, Consequences and Design of Cool Climate Viticulture Training Systems. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Małachowska, M.; Majak, T.; Krupa, T.; Tomala, K. Increasing Productivity and Fruit Quality of ‘Mutsu’ Apple Orchard by Dwarfing Treatments. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kapłan, M.; Klimek, K.E.; Buczyński, K. Analysis of the Impact of Treatments Stimulating Branching on the Quality of Maiden Apple Trees. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wojciechowicz-Żytko, E.; Kunicki, E.; Nawrocki, J. Influence of Biostimulants and Microbiological Preparations on the Yield and the Occurrence of Diseases and the European Corn Borer (Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn, Lepidoptera, Crambidae) on Sweet Corn (Zea mays L. Var. saccharata). Agriculture 2024, 14, 1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kunicki, E.; Capecka, E.; Wojciechowicz-Żytko, E. The Effect of Chosen Biostimulants on the Yield of White Cabbage. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mikiciuk, G.; Miller, T.; Kisiel, A.; Cembrowska-Lech, D.; Mikiciuk, M.; Łobodzińska, A.; Bokszczanin, K. Harnessing Beneficial Microbes for Drought Tolerance: A Review of Ecological and Agricultural Innovations. Agriculture 2024, 14, 2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Antkowiak, W.; Bosiacki, M.; Sowelo, M. Potential of Selected Species of Spiraea L. for Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals from Soils of Urban Areas. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Przybyłko, S.; Marszał, J.; Kowalczyk, W.; Szpadzik, E. Effect of Kaolin Clay on Post-Bloom Thinning Efficacy, Cropping, and Fruit Quality in ‘Gala Vill’ Apple (Malus × domestica) Cultivation. Agriculture 2025, 15, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kozioł, A.; Paliwoda, D.; Mikiciuk, G.; Benhadji, N. Biochar as a Multi-Action Substance Used to Improve Soil Properties in Horticultural and Agricultural Crops—A Review. Agriculture 2024, 14, 2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rokosa, M.; Mikiciuk, M.; Ptak, P. Assessment of Physiological Traits of Fragaria vesca Genotypes Under Water Deficit Conditions. Agriculture 2025, 15, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Adamczewska-Sowińska, K.; Bykowy, J.; Jaworska, J. Effect of Biodegradable Mulch and Different Synthetic Mulches on Growth and Yield of Field-Grown Small-Fruited Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Agriculture 2025, 15, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Adamczewska-Sowińska, K. The Use of Soil Surface Mulching on Melon (Cucumis melo L.) Production under Temperate Climate Conditions. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Licznar-Małańczuk, M. Impact of High Nitrogen Doses and Living Mulch on Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of Young Apple Trees (cv. ‘Sampion’). Agriculture 2025, 15, 724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Licznar-Malanczuk, M.; Baluszynska, U.B. Do Living Mulches or Environmental Conditions Have a Greater Impact on the External Quality of the Apple Fruit ‘Chopin’ Cultivar? Agriculture 2024, 14, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Parveze, M.U.; Mir, M.M.; Rehman, M.U.; Iqbal, U.; Khan, S.Q.; Khan, F.A.; Khan, I.; Qayoom, S.; Mushtaq, I.; Shah, H.K.; et al. Regulation of crop load and quality in sweet cherry cv. ‘Sweet Heart’ using blossom thinning. Folia Hortic. 2024, 36, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Małachowska, M.; Tomala, K. Apple Quality during Shelf-Life after Long-Term Storage and Simulated Transport. Agriculture 2023, 13, 2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kowalczyk, B.A.; Bieniasz, M.; Błaszczyk, J. Effect of Short-Term Storage in Modified Atmosphere Packaging (MAP) and Controlled Atmosphere (CA) on Total Polyphenol Content and Antioxidant Activity in Juices from Haskap Berry (Lonicera caerulea L.). Agriculture 2025, 15, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Małachowska, M.; Tomala, K. Effect of Preharvest and Postharvest Application of 1-MCP on the Quality of Gala Schniga® SchniCo Red(s) Apples during Long-Term Storage. Agriculture 2022, 12, 2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Łysiak, G.P.; Szot, I. The Use of Temperature Based Indices for Estimation of Fruit Production Conditions and Risks in Temperate Climates. Agriculture 2023, 13, 960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hęś, M.; Antkowiak, W.; Stuper-Szablewska, K.; Dziedzic, K.; Jessa, M.; Ratajczak, P. Assessment of the Antioxidative Properties of Extracts from the Fruits of Pyrus pyraster (L.) Burgsd and Pyrus × myloslavensis Czarna & Antkowiak Grown under Natural Environmental Conditions. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Aninbon, C.; Surach, N.; Phungam, N.; Janket, A.; Bunphan, D.; Charirak, P.; Ruttanaprasert, R. Stability of anthocyanin, carotenoid and root yield of 10 sweet potato genotypes. Folia Hortic. 2025, 36, 475–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Łysiak, G.P. The Impact of Environmental Factors on the Quality of Horticultural Commodities. Agriculture 2025, 15, 1829. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15171829

AMA Style

Łysiak GP. The Impact of Environmental Factors on the Quality of Horticultural Commodities. Agriculture. 2025; 15(17):1829. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15171829

Chicago/Turabian Style

Łysiak, Grzegorz P. 2025. "The Impact of Environmental Factors on the Quality of Horticultural Commodities" Agriculture 15, no. 17: 1829. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15171829

APA Style

Łysiak, G. P. (2025). The Impact of Environmental Factors on the Quality of Horticultural Commodities. Agriculture, 15(17), 1829. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15171829

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop