AGRARIAN: A Hybrid AI-Driven Architecture for Smart Agriculture
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Related Technologies
2.1. AI for Crop Protection and Environmental Monitoring
2.2. DSS for Water Resource and Livestock Management
2.3. Circular Bioeconomy and Smart Supply Chains
2.4. Convergence of Digital Agriculture Technologies
2.5. Challenges and Infrastructure Considerations
- Connectivity Gaps: Many rural farming areas suffer from limited broadband access, restricting the adoption of real-time IoT monitoring and AI-driven decision systems [19].
- Interoperability Issues: The diverse range of agricultural IoT devices, cloud platforms, and AI models creates integration challenges, requiring standardized data exchange protocols [20].
2.6. Edge Computing and Federated AI for Real-Time Farming
3. AGRARIAN Architecture
- Agricultural Decision Support System (ADSS): Analyzes sensor, satellite, and UAV data to provide actionable insights on crop health, livestock management, and irrigation scheduling.
- Livestock Monitoring and Anomaly Detection: Uses AI-driven video analytics and GPS tracking to identify anomalous animal behavior, potential health risks, and missing livestock.
- Crop Growth and Yield Forecasting: Predicts crop productivity, pest risks, and optimal harvesting times based on machine learning algorithms and real-time environmental data.
- Smart Irrigation and Water Management: Uses soil moisture analytics, weather forecasts, and AI-based optimization to ensure efficient water usage and minimize waste.
- Disease and Pest Alert Systems: AI models process multispectral and SAR data to predict disease outbreaks and recommend timely interventions.
- Supply Chain Traceability and Food Safety: Blockchain-enabled traceability solutions ensure transparent farm-to-market logistics, improving food safety and regulatory compliance.
- Edge AI and Federated Learning: Distributed AI models are deployed on satellites, UAVs, and farm-based edge nodes, allowing real-time inference for disease detection, irrigation control, and crop monitoring.
- CI/CD Pipelines for AI Model Deployment: Continuous integration and deployment pipelines ensure real-time AI model updates for improved analytics and decision-making.
- Cloud-Native Orchestration (Kubernetes, KubeEdge, and K3s): Supports scalable, fault-tolerant, and distributed AI computing for precision farming applications.
- Satellite AI Processing: Enables onboard AI inference on CubeSats, reducing latency and bandwidth consumption while providing actionable insights directly from space-based monitoring.
- Data Storage and Integration with External Sources: Ensures secure, efficient storage and retrieval of environmental, livestock, and field data, integrating external climate databases, weather APIs, and agricultural knowledge repositories.
- 5G-Based Communication: Provides high-speed, low-latency connectivity for real-time sensor data transmission and remote farm monitoring.
- Hybrid Satellite Communications (LEO and GEO): LEO satellites facilitate low-latency broadband access, while GEO satellites provide continuous global coverage.
- Edge Network Infrastructure: Supports real-time AI model deployment and inference at the farm level, reducing dependency on centralized cloud computing.
- Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) and IoT Protocols: Allow efficient data transmission in rural and disconnected environments, ensuring that time-sensitive agricultural data is not lost.
- Ground Network Infrastructure: Includes 5G base stations, ground terminals, and IoT gateways, allowing seamless integration of AGRARIAN’s sensor networks with cloud-based decision support systems.
- IoT and Ground Sensors: Measure soil moisture, temperature, air humidity, and precipitation, providing critical data for precision irrigation and crop health analysis.
- UAV-Based Sensors: Equipped with multispectral cameras, RGB cameras, and real-time kinematic (RTK) sensors to provide high-resolution field images and topographical mapping.
- Weather and Climate Stations: Monitor meteorological parameters such as wind speed, temperature, solar radiation, and frost prediction, supporting weather-based agricultural decision-making.
- Satellite Earth Observation (EO) Systems: Utilize Sentinel-based multispectral imaging and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) to provide wide-area, high-resolution monitoring for crop health, soil moisture levels, and yield estimation.
- Livestock Tracking Devices: Sensors embedded in wearables and drones to track animal movement, health status, and anomaly detection.
4. Preliminary Validation of AGRARIAN over 5G Network Slicing for Data Processing and Sensor Layers
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
AI | Artificial Intelligence |
DSS | Decision Support System |
IoT | Internet of Things |
UAV | Unmanned Aerial Vehicle |
LEO | Low Earth Orbit |
GEO | Geostationary Earth Orbit |
SAR | Synthetic Aperture Radar |
5G NTN | 5G Non-Terrestrial Network |
RINA | Recursive InterNetwork Architecture |
NETCONF | Network Configuration Protocol |
YANG | Yet Another Next Generation |
DTN | Delay-Tolerant Networking |
MCDA | Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis |
GIS | Geographic Information System |
EO | Earth Observation |
References
- European Commission. The Digitalisation of the European Agricultural Sector. Available online: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/digitalisation-agriculture (accessed on 6 September 2024).
- De Clercq, M.; Vats, A.; Biel, A. Agriculture 4.0: The Future of Farming Technology. In Proceedings of the World Government Summit, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 11–13 February 2018. [Google Scholar]
- European Union. Common Agricultural Policy. Available online: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy_en (accessed on 6 September 2024).
- European Commission. Explore Farm Incomes in the EU, Farm Economics Overview Based on 2021 FADN Data; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council—Summary of CAP Strategic Plans for 2023–2027: Joint Effort and Collective Ambition; Brussels, Belgium, November 2023. Available online: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/document/download/6b1c933f-84ef-4b45-9171-debb88f1f757_en?filename=com-2023-707-report_en.pdf (accessed on 6 September 2024).
- Latruffe, L. Competitiveness, Productivity and Efficiency in the Agricultural and Agri-Food Sectors; OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 30; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eurostat. Agricultural Labour Input (Annual Rate of Change, 2022–2023). Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=File:F4rv_Agricultural_labour_input_(%25,_annual_rate_of_change,_2022-2023).png (accessed on 6 September 2024).
- Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development. Catalogue of CAP Interventions. Available online: https://agridata.ec.europa.eu/extensions/DashboardCapPlan/catalogue_interventions.html (accessed on 6 September 2024).
- Oppong, R.A. Integration of IoT-Based Sprinklers, Embedded Systems, Data, and Cloud Computing for Smart Irrigation Management. World J. Adv. Res. Rev. 2025, 25, 126–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vasylishyn, S. FADNFSDN as a Tool for Accounting Information and Statistical Support of Ukraine’s State Agrarian Policy in the Context of European Integration. J. Agric. Econ. 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Jensen, A.; Brown, P.; Groves, K.; Morshed, A. Next Generation Crop Protection: A Systematic Review of Trends in Modelling Approaches for Disease Prediction. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2025, 234, 110245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calka, B.; Szostak, M. GIS-Based Environmental Monitoring and Analysis. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 3155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Firoozzare, A.; Dourandish, A.; Sabouhi, M. Group Decision-Making of Agricultural Stakeholders Towards Sustainable Groundwater Resources Management: A Case Study in North Khorasan. J. Environ. Agric. Dev. 2025, 38, 443–460. [Google Scholar]
- Distante, D.; Albanello, C.; Zaffar, H.; Faralli, S. Artificial Intelligence Applied to Precision Livestock Farming: A Tertiary Study. Smart Agric. Syst. 2025, 11, 100889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaynak, T.; Gümüş, M.G. Biogas Potential Estimation and Geospatial Decision-Making: A Hybrid MCDA Approach to Optimizing Biogas Facility Locations. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.H.; Wang, X.; Utomo, D.; Gage, E.; Xu, B. Circular Bioeconomy and Sustainable Food Systems: What Are the Possible Mechanisms? Clean. Circ. Econ. 2025, 11, 100145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De, S.; Sanyal, D.K.; Mukherjee, I. Fine-Tuned Encoder Models with Data Augmentation Beat ChatGPT in Agricultural Named Entity Recognition and Relation Extraction. Expert Syst. Appl. 2025, 277, 127126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krachunova, T.; Geppert, F.; Lemke, N. Digital Technologies Commercially Available in Germany in the Context of Nature Conservation and Ecosystem Service Provisioning in Agriculture. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2025, 9, 1464020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKeown, N.; Anderson, T.; Balakrishnan, H.; Parulkar, G.; Peterson, L.; Rexford, J.; Shenker, S.; Turner, J. OpenFlow: Enabling Innovation in Campus Networks. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 2008, 38, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Enns, R.; Björklund, M.; Bierman, A.; Schönwälder, J. Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF); Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF): Wilmington, DE, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Björklund, M. YANG—A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF); Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF): Wilmington, DE, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ETSI-GR NGP 009; Next Generation Protocols (NGP); An Example of a Non-IP Network Protocol Architecture Based on RINA Design Principles. European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI): Sophia Antipolis, France, 2019.
- Maffione, V.; Salvestrini, F.; Grasa, E.; Bergesio, L.; Tarzan, M. A Software Development Kit to Exploit RINA Programmability. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 22–27 May 2016; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Q.; Zhao, H.; Feng, Y.; Wang, Z.; Ning, Z.; Luo, T. Edge Computing-Oriented Smart Agricultural Supply Chain Mechanism with Auction and Fuzzy Neural Networks. J. Cloud Comput. 2024, 13, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
AGRARIAN Component | Author, Year, Ref. No. | How AGRARIAN Benefits the Field | Mapped AGRARIAN Layer(s) | Benefit to Agriculture |
IoT and 5G for Smart Irrigation | Oppong, R.A. (2025) [9] | Enhances precision irrigation by leveraging real-time sensor data. | Sensor Layer, Network Layer | Enhances irrigation efficiency, prevents overwatering, and improves water conservation. |
Decision Support Systems (DSS) for Agrarian Policy | Vasylishyn, S. (2025) [10] | Provides AI-driven policy recommendations based on real-time agricultural data. | Application Layer, Data Processing Layer | Optimizes agricultural resource allocation, policy effectiveness, and economic sustainability. |
AI-Based Crop Protection and DSS | Jensen, A. et al. (2025) [11] | Enables early disease detection and pest management through AI-powered analytics. | Data Processing Layer, Sensor Layer | Reduces pesticide use, increases farm productivity, and enhances sustainability. |
CubeSats for Agricultural Monitoring | Calka, B.; Szostak, M. (2025) [12] | Offers high-resolution environmental monitoring for precision farming. | Sensor Layer, Network Layer | Provides real-time insights into soil health, crop growth, and environmental conditions. |
Smart Agriculture and DSS for Water Resource Management | Firoozzare, A. et al. (2025) [13] | Improves sustainable water resource management using AI-driven climate data. | Application Layer, Data Processing Layer | Ensures sustainable water allocation, mitigates drought impacts, and supports climate resilience. |
AI for Precision Livestock Farming | Distante, D. et al. (2025) [14] | Enhances livestock welfare via real-time biometric monitoring and disease detection. | Sensor Layer, Data Processing Layer | Reduces livestock mortality, increases efficiency, and improves farm profitability. |
Sustainable Agricultural Planning using DSS | Kaynak, T.; Gümüş, M.G. (2025) [15] | Supports energy-efficient agriculture through AI-driven biogas plant planning. | Application Layer, Network Layer | Supports renewable energy integration and reduces the carbon footprint in agriculture. |
Circular Bioeconomy and DSS in Agriculture | Nguyen, T.H. et al. (2025) [16] | Facilitates circular agriculture by optimizing waste recycling. | Application Layer, Data Processing Layer | Promotes waste reduction, circular economy strategies, and resource-efficient food production. |
Digital Agriculture and AI Decision Systems | De, S.; Sanyal, D.K.; Mukherjee, I. (2025) [17] | Improves real-time farm management with AI-enhanced automation tools. | Application Layer, Data Processing Layer | Enhances farm decision-making with AI-driven insights and real-time analytics. |
Digital Technologies for Sustainable Agriculture | Krachunova, T. et al. (2025) [18] | Enables sustainable farming through AI-integrated remote sensing and DSS tools. | Application Layer, Sensor Layer, Network Layer | Encourages climate-smart farming through AI, IoT, and sustainable land management practices. |
Configuration | srPeriod | Slot Duration | Expected Latency |
---|---|---|---|
Config 1 (Min Latency) | 1 | 2.5 | ~10 ms |
Config 2 | 1 | 5.0 | ~15–18 ms |
Config 3 | 10 | 2.5 | ~20–25 ms |
Config 4 | 10 | 5.0 | ~30 ms |
Config 5 | 40 | 2.5 | ~35 ms |
Config 6 (Max Latency) | 40 | 5.0 | ~40 ms |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Batistatos, M.C.; de Cola, T.; Kourtis, M.A.; Apostolopoulou, V.; Xilouris, G.K.; Sagias, N.C. AGRARIAN: A Hybrid AI-Driven Architecture for Smart Agriculture. Agriculture 2025, 15, 904. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15080904
Batistatos MC, de Cola T, Kourtis MA, Apostolopoulou V, Xilouris GK, Sagias NC. AGRARIAN: A Hybrid AI-Driven Architecture for Smart Agriculture. Agriculture. 2025; 15(8):904. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15080904
Chicago/Turabian StyleBatistatos, Michael C., Tomaso de Cola, Michail Alexandros Kourtis, Vassiliki Apostolopoulou, George K. Xilouris, and Nikos C. Sagias. 2025. "AGRARIAN: A Hybrid AI-Driven Architecture for Smart Agriculture" Agriculture 15, no. 8: 904. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15080904
APA StyleBatistatos, M. C., de Cola, T., Kourtis, M. A., Apostolopoulou, V., Xilouris, G. K., & Sagias, N. C. (2025). AGRARIAN: A Hybrid AI-Driven Architecture for Smart Agriculture. Agriculture, 15(8), 904. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15080904