Next Article in Journal
Addition of Fish Oil to Cream Cheese Affects Lipid Oxidation, Sensory Stability and Microstructure
Next Article in Special Issue
Potential of Waste Water Use for Jatropha Cultivation in Arid Environments
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Water Use and Water-Use Efficiency of Three Perennial Bioenergy Grass Crops in Florida
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Agricultural Ethics of Biofuels: The Food vs. Fuel Debate

by
Paul B. Thompson
1,2,3
1
Department of Philosophy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1032, USA
2
Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1032, USA
3
Department of Community, Agriculture, Recreation and Resource Studies, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1032, USA 
Agriculture 2012, 2(4), 339-358; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture2040339
Submission received: 18 September 2012 / Revised: 25 October 2012 / Accepted: 26 October 2012 / Published: 6 November 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofuels, Food Security, and Accompanying Environmental Concerns)

Abstract

Plant-based transportation fuels were the focus of extended criticism in the press, especially during 2008 when a portion of the blame for a spike in global food prices was associated with growth of the United States’ corn ethanol industry. The critique is based on an unsophisticated portrayal of the ethical issues at stake in the food security implications of biofuel. Three ethical critiques can be leveled at the food vs. fuel debate. First, although market drivers of biofuels indeed skew consumption of agricultural grains, this is not a problem that is unique to biofuels. Second, the critique does not reflect an adequate understanding of the way that rising food prices and changes in agricultural technology affect the food security of the poorest people. Third, although rising food prices could be beneficial to poor farm producers among the world’s poor, it is unlikely that benefits will materialize in the absence of concerted programs to deliberately select biofuel development strategies that are targeted to strengthen food security for poor and small-holding producers. An adequate agricultural ethics for biofuels will require commitment by both private and public sector biofuel developers to ensure that potentially positive attributes of biofuel development are realized.
Keywords: hunger; food security; food prices; moral responsibility; transportation fuels hunger; food security; food prices; moral responsibility; transportation fuels

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Thompson, P.B. The Agricultural Ethics of Biofuels: The Food vs. Fuel Debate. Agriculture 2012, 2, 339-358. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture2040339

AMA Style

Thompson PB. The Agricultural Ethics of Biofuels: The Food vs. Fuel Debate. Agriculture. 2012; 2(4):339-358. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture2040339

Chicago/Turabian Style

Thompson, Paul B. 2012. "The Agricultural Ethics of Biofuels: The Food vs. Fuel Debate" Agriculture 2, no. 4: 339-358. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture2040339

APA Style

Thompson, P. B. (2012). The Agricultural Ethics of Biofuels: The Food vs. Fuel Debate. Agriculture, 2(4), 339-358. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture2040339

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop