Next Article in Journal
Three-Dimensional Direct Numerical Simulations of a Yawed Square Cylinder in Steady Flow
Next Article in Special Issue
URANS Calculation of Ship Heave and Pitch Motions in Marine Simulator Based on Overset Mesh
Previous Article in Journal
Scattering and Directionality Effects of Noise Generation from Flapping Thrusters Used for Propulsion of Small Ocean Vehicles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fast Multigrid Algorithm for Non-Linear Simulation of Intact and Damaged Ship Motions in Waves
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessment of CFD-Based Ship Maneuvering Predictions Using Different Propeller Modeling Methods

1
School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
3
Faculty of Maritime and Transportation, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10(8), 1131; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10081131
Submission received: 21 June 2022 / Revised: 8 August 2022 / Accepted: 15 August 2022 / Published: 17 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hydrodynamic Analysis on Ship Performance)

Abstract

Propeller modeling in virtual captive model tests is crucial to the prediction accuracy of ship maneuvering motion. In the present study, the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) method with two propeller modeling methods, Sliding Mesh (SM) and Multiple Reference Frames (MRF), was used to simulate the captive model tests for a KVLCC2 tanker model. The virtual captive model tests, including for resistance, self-propulsion, rudder force, oblique towing, circular motion, oblique towing and steady turning tests with rudder angle, were conducted by solving the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations. The computed hydrodynamic forces, hydrodynamic derivatives, and hull-propeller-rudder interaction coefficients were validated against the available captive model test data and the CFD results obtained by a Body Force (BF) method in the literature. Then the standard turning circle and zig-zag maneuvers were simulated by using the MMG (Maneuvering Modeling Group) model with the computed hydrodynamic derivatives and hull-propeller-rudder interaction coefficients, and the results were validated against available free-running model test data. The most satisfactory agreement in terms of the ship hydrodynamic forces and maneuvering parameters and the most accurate rudder normal force were obtained by the SM method rather than by the MRF or the BF methods, while the lateral forces and yaw moments obtained by the SM and the MRF methods were all in good agreement with the model test data.
Keywords: ship maneuvering; MMG model; virtual captive model tests; propeller modeling; SM method; MRF method ship maneuvering; MMG model; virtual captive model tests; propeller modeling; SM method; MRF method

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, C.; Zou, L.; Zou, Z.; Guo, H. Assessment of CFD-Based Ship Maneuvering Predictions Using Different Propeller Modeling Methods. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1131. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10081131

AMA Style

Chen C, Zou L, Zou Z, Guo H. Assessment of CFD-Based Ship Maneuvering Predictions Using Different Propeller Modeling Methods. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2022; 10(8):1131. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10081131

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Changzhe, Lu Zou, Zaojian Zou, and Haipeng Guo. 2022. "Assessment of CFD-Based Ship Maneuvering Predictions Using Different Propeller Modeling Methods" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 10, no. 8: 1131. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10081131

APA Style

Chen, C., Zou, L., Zou, Z., & Guo, H. (2022). Assessment of CFD-Based Ship Maneuvering Predictions Using Different Propeller Modeling Methods. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(8), 1131. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10081131

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop