Next Article in Journal
Research on the Directional Characteristics of the Reflectance of Oil-Contaminated Sea Ice
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of Multi-Timescale Sea Level Variability near Jamaica in the Caribbean Using Satellite Altimetry Records
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Scenario-Based Hazard Assessment of Local Tsunami for Coastal Areas: A Case Study of Xiamen City, Fujian Province, China

1
School of Emergency Management Science and Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
2
National Institute of Natural Hazards, Ministry of Emergency Management of China, Beijing 100085, China
3
Key Laboratory of Compound and Chained Natural Hazards Dynamics, Ministry of Emergency Management of China, Beijing 100085, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11(8), 1501; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11081501
Submission received: 10 July 2023 / Revised: 23 July 2023 / Accepted: 26 July 2023 / Published: 28 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Marine Hazards)

Abstract

:
In this study, three worst-case credible tsunamigenic scenarios (Mw8.0) from Xiamen fault 1 (XF 1), Xiamen fault 2 (XF 2) and Xiamen fault 3 (XF 3) located off the coast of Xiamen were selected to assess the local tsunami hazard for Xiamen city, Fujian province, China. The GeoClaw model was utilized to compute the propagation and inundation of the tsunami for each scenario. The simulation results show that local tsunamis from XF 1–3 hit Xiamen within 1.5 h of earthquakes. The highest level of tsunami hazard in Xiamen is level II, which corresponds to an inundation depth ranging from 1.2 to 3.0 m. The areas with tsunami hazard level II in each scenario are primarily concentrated in the coastal areas of southern Haicang district and eastern Siming district, which are in the primary propagation direction of the tsunami. Since XF 2 and XF 3 are aligned almost parallel to the coastline of Xiamen, local tsunamis from XF 2 and XF 3 could cause more serious hazards to the coastal areas of Xiamen city. This work provides a typical case for researchers to understand the local tsunami hazard assessment for coastal cities. The research results can provide scientific references for the development of tsunami hazard assessment and early warning systems for coastal cities in southeastern China.

1. Introduction

Tsunamis are widely recognized as one of the most destructive natural disasters, posing a significant threat to human life and property safety. Although tsunamis can be generated by earthquakes, submarine landslides, volcanic eruptions, and meteorite impacts [1,2,3,4], earthquakes are responsible for generating around 80% of all tsunamis, as indicated by the global historical record [5]. For example, the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami and the 2011 Great East Japan tsunami were megatsunamis triggered by earthquakes, all of which caused huge human and economic losses [6,7]. These catastrophic tsunami events have caused countries around the world to pay great attention to the hazard assessment of earthquake-induced tsunamis in coastal areas.
There are two dominant approaches used for tsunami hazard assessment, the probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment (PTHA) and the scenario-based tsunami hazard assessment (also known as deterministic tsunami hazard assessment, DTHA). PTHA, which typically considers all potential tsunami events to assess the probability of a tsunami wave height exceeding the threshold level at a particular site over a certain period in the future, has been used in many previous studies. Horspool et al. [8] performed a probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment for Indonesia based on tsunamis generated from local, regional, and distant sources. The results suggest that Sumatra, Java, and northern Papua have a 1–10% probability of experiencing a tsunami of height greater than 3.0 m per year. Liu et al. [9] developed a PTHA framework for the southeastern coastal region of China based on regional and local tsunami sources. The results showed that southern and central Fujian provinces had the highest hazard level. Scenario-based tsunami hazard assessment methods [10,11], which evaluate the tsunami hazard at a specific site by qualitatively defining and simulating a worst-case credible tsunamigenic scenario in one tsunami source qualitatively, have been widely used in many coastal countries in recent years. For example, Al-Habsi et al. [12] selected two worst-case credible tsunamigenic scenarios from western and eastern segments of the Makran subduction zone and simulated the tsunamis in each scenario for the Qurayyat region, northeast Oman. Based on the simulation results, tsunami hazard maps were produced for Qurayyat in each scenario. Santos et al. [13] took the 1755 Lisbon earthquake–tsunami event as the worst tsunami scenario and used the TUNAMI-N2 model to simulate the generation and propagation of the tsunami. They conducted a tsunami hazard assessment at Oeiras municipality (Portugal) based on the tsunami arrival time and water level height. Fan et al. [14] used the COMCOT model to simulate a worst-case local tsunami scenario caused by the maximum credible earthquake (Mw8.0) occurring at the Quanzhou fault along China’s southeast coast and conducted a tsunami hazard analysis of the coastal area of Putian City based on the tsunami inundation depth. The results of these studies are essential for the prevention and mitigation of tsunami disasters in the affected regions.
China’s coastline is 18,000 km long, and coastal areas are economically developed [15]. To predict and prevent possible future tsunami hazards, researchers have conducted numerous studies on potential earthquake-induced tsunami hazards in and around China’s sea area [9,16,17,18,19,20]. The Ryukyu Trench and Manila Trench, as the main regional tsunami sources in China, have received extensive attention for a long time [21,22,23,24,25]. In addition, there are eight local tsunami sources near the continental shelf in the South China Sea [26,27]. Tsunamis from these local potential sources could affect coastal cities in southeast China. Xiamen is situated on the southeast coast of Fujian province in China and is one of the first groups of special economic zones established by the country, with a developed and densely populated economy. Three of the known potential local tsunami sources identified by previous studies [26,27] are located off Xiamen, which are Xiamen fault 1 (XF 1), Xiamen fault 2 (XF 2) and Xiamen fault 3 (XF 3). The local tsunamis from XF 1–3 could cause severe damage to coastal areas of Xiamen due to the short distance between the tsunami sources and the city’s coastline and limited emergency response time. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct the hazard assessment of local tsunami for Xiamen city.
In this study, three worst-case credible tsunamigenic scenarios from XF 1–3 were selected to assess the local tsunami hazard for Xiamen city. The magnitude of the tsunamigenic earthquake in each scenario was determined as Mw8.0 according to the upper-limit earthquake magnitude of the local source. We then simulated the propagation and inundation of the local tsunami for each scenario based on the GeoClaw model. Finally, we produced the local tsunami hazard maps for Xiamen city based on the simulation results. The results will be beneficial for coastal cities in developing refined tsunami disaster contingency plans.

2. Study Area

Xiamen is in the southeast of Fujian province, adjacent to the Taiwan Strait to the east, and bordering Zhangzhou and Quanzhou (Figure 1). It is an important foreign trade port and a popular tourist city in China. Xiamen is administratively divided into six districts, namely Siming, Huli, Jimei, Haicang, Tong’an, and Xiang’an (Figure 1c). Xiamen’s topography is mostly flat, with slightly higher elevation in the northwest and lower elevation in the southeast. The elevation of the coastal area is below 10 m. The flat terrain of Xiamen’s coastal area makes it susceptible to potential tsunami events, which may cause significant damage to ports and coastal scenic areas.
Figure 1b shows the earthquake-induced tsunamis and earthquakes with magnitudes of 6.0 or higher occurred in the vicinity of the southeastern coast of China between 1000 BC and 2023 AD. Historical tsunami data were collected from the Global Historical Tsunami Database, which is released by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Centers for Environmental Information (www.ngdc.noaa.gov (accessed on 20 March 2023)), and historical earthquake data were obtained from the earthquake catalog of the United States Geological Survey (www.earthquake.usgs.gov (accessed on 21 March 2023)) and the earthquake statistical data recorded by the China Earthquake Networks Center (www.ceic.ac.cn (accessed on 20 March 2023)). Throughout history, the waters near Xiamen have experienced several tsunamis. In 1604, a tsunami was induced by a Mw7.5 earthquake that occurred along the coast of Quanzhou [14,28]. In 1918, a descending tsunami induced by the Mw7.5 earthquake off the coast of Nan’ao Island affected several cities along the coast of southern China [29,30]. These historical events indicate that Xiamen may be affected by local tsunamis from adjacent sea areas. By analyzing the Seismic Ground Motion Parameter Zonation Map of China (GB 18306-2015) and taking into account the regional geological structure, seismic activity, and stress field distribution, Ren et al. [27] identified eight potential local tsunami sources in the southeast coast of China. The Xiamen fault 1–3 (XF 1–3), located off Xiamen city, are three of the eight local sources, as shown in Figure 1b. Building on the findings of Ren et al. [27], we simulated the propagation and inundation of tsunamis triggered by the maximum credible earthquakes in XF 1–3, respectively. A total of ten evenly distributed virtual points (Figure 1c) were selected at a water depth of 10 m in the waters around Xiamen to analyze the tsunami wave propagation characteristics off the coast of Xiamen.

3. Data and Methods

3.1. Data

Detailed and accurate bathymetry and topographic data are required to obtain good results for tsunami simulations. The bathymetry and topographic data used in this study are shown in Table 1. Bathymetry data were obtained from the General Bathymetric Chart of Oceans 2022 (GEBCO_2022) data jointly released by the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) and the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC). Topographic data were obtained from ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V3 (ASTER GDEM V3) data jointly released by National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) of Japan. The modelling domains are formed from these two data for tsunami modelling.

3.2. Methods

3.2.1. Design of the Earthquake Scenarios

Table 2 provides a list of the notation of parameters used in this study. Supposing that XF 1, XF 2 and XF 3 are all thrust-type faults, three worst-case credible tsunamigenic scenarios from XF 1–3 were selected. Referring to the upper-limit earthquake magnitude of these three local sources proposed by Ren et al. [27], the magnitude of the tsunamigenic earthquake in each scenario is determined as Mw8.0. The fault strike, rake, dip and source depth were set to the values provided by Ren et al. [27].
The fault length and width are estimated by the empirical relationship formula proposed by Blaser et al. [31]:
l o g L = 2.37 + 0.57 × M w
l o g W = 1.86 + 0.46 × M w
where Mw is the seismic moment magnitude, L is the length of the fault plane and W is the width of the fault plane.
The average slip was estimated using the following equation [32]:
M 0 = μ L W D
where M0 is the seismic moment, D is the average coseismic slip and μ is the shear rigidity of the Earth’s crust. In this study, μ was set to 35 GPa for the Chinese mainland [9,27]. M0 could be estimated based on the conversion relationship between Mw and M0 [33]:
M w = 2 3 l o g M 0 10.7
The earthquake parameters used in each scenario are shown in Table 3. We simply adopted the instantaneous rupture as the fault rupture model. Previous numerical simulation studies of earthquake-induced tsunamis have extensively used instantaneous rupture models [15,34]. In recent years, it has been demonstrated that the tsunami wave height is sensitive to the fault rupture process [35,36]. However, considering the complexity of the fault rupture process and the difficulty of accurate prediction, the use of instantaneous rupture without the support of more observational data is acceptable in this study.

3.2.2. Tsunami Numerical Model

The propagation and inundation of tsunamis are simulated in this paper using the GeoClaw numerical model [37]. The GeoClaw model is grounded on the nonlinear shallow water equation, which implements a high-resolution finite volume method on a rectangular grid and adopts adaptive mesh refinement (AMR). The nonlinear effects of tsunami wave propagation in coastal oceans are considered in the model. The 2D nonlinear shallow water equations are written as
h t + h u x + h v y = 0
h u t + x h u 2 + 1 2 g h 2 + h u v y = g h b x τ x
h v t + h u v x + y h v 2 + 1 2 g h 2 = g h b y τ y
where t represents time, h (x, y, t) is total water depth, b (x, y) is the bottom elevation function, u (x, y, t) and v (x, y, t) denote the depth-averaged velocities in x and y directions respectively, g is the acceleration due to gravity. The bottom friction terms could be written as
τ x = g n 2 h 7 3 h u h u 2 + h v 2
τ y = g n 2 h 7 3 h v h u 2 + h v 2
where n is the Manning coefficient and represents the roughness of the bottom.
In this study, the computational domain ranges from 115° E to 122° E and 20° N to 28° N (Figure 1b). Three mesh layers were used to simulate for the AMR, with a ratio of 1:8:15. The resolution of the coarsest grid was set to 2 arcmin; the resolution of the finest grid was set to 1 arcsec. Referring to the model setup of Li et al. [30] in simulating the impact of the 1918 Nan’ao earthquake-induced tsunami on the southeast coast of China, we set the Manning coefficient as 0.013 in the computational domain. The computing platform used for the numerical simulation was an Inter (R) Xeon (R) Sliver 4216 CPU @ 2.10 GHz with 64 gigabytes of memory and 32 cores. The simulation time was 6 h from the beginning of the earthquake.

4. Results

4.1. Characteristics of Tsunami Wave Generation and Propagation

The initial sea surface elevation was calculated using the Okada model [38] based on earthquake source parameters. Figure 2a–c show that negative waves close to −2.0 m appear on the landward side and positive waves close to 2.5 m on the seaward side in the direction perpendicular to the fault for each scenario. The wave height is uniformly distributed along the strike of the fault.
As shown in Figure 3a–c, due to the close location between tsunami sources, the tsunami in each scenario reaches the nearest coast of Xiamen within 1.5 h of the earthquake and spreads to all coasts of Xiamen about 2 h later. Figure 3a shows that the tsunami from XF 1 hits the coast of Zhejiang province 4 h after the earthquake and reaches the coast of Guangdong province 2 h later. Figure 3b,c show that the tsunamis from XF 2 and XF 3 arrive at the coast of Zhejiang province 4.5 h after the earthquake and spread to the coast of Guangdong province 1.5 h later. Moreover, the decisive effect of submarine topography on tsunami propagation can be seen in Figure 3. Since the speed of tsunami propagation is proportional to the square root of the water depth, tsunami waves propagate faster in deep ocean areas than in near-shore waters. This is also reflected by the denser isochrones on the coastal shelf in Figure 3a–c. In summary, we conclude that the continental slope and shelf area slows down the propagation speed of the tsunami and the time to reach the coast.
Figure 4 shows that the surface elevation timeseries for each scenario at 10 virtual points around the Xiamen coast. The phenomenon of water recession is first observed in the coastal areas of Xiamen after the earthquake. The tsunami from XF 1 takes the shortest time to reach Xiamen, and the tsunami from XF 3 arrives at the coastline of Xiamen the latest. In each scenario, the tsunami first spreads to Dadeng waters (P1) and east Xiamen waters (P4) within 1.5 h of the earthquake. Then, the tsunami propagates to west Xiamen waters (P7) and south of Tong’an Bay (P10), which are in the inner part of Xiamen city, two hours later. Since the tsunamigenic earthquakes have the same magnitude, the tsunami amplitudes at the same virtual point for all scenarios do not differ significantly, and only the maximum tsunami amplitude is slightly higher in the S2 and S3 scenarios (Figure 4). Therefore, we believe that the nearshore tsunami wave amplitude is affected by the magnitude of the earthquake. In addition, the tsunami displays different waveforms at different virtual points of the same scenario but shows significant waveform similarity at the same virtual point of different scenarios (Figure 4). Combined with the characteristics of Xiamen’s coastal terrain, we conclude that coastal terrain is an important influence on the propagation of tsunamis in the nearshore.
The tsunami wave height at the virtual points located in Dadeng waters (P1, P2), west Xiamen waters (P7) and Tong‘an Bay (P8, P9, P10) does not exceed 1.2 m for all three scenarios, as shown in Figure 4. The maximum water surface elevation at P5 located in south Xiamen waters is 1.3 m, 1.6 m and 1.6 m for S1, S2 and S3 scenarios, respectively. The maximum water surface elevations at P6 located in the Jiulong River estuary are 1.0 m, 1.4 m and 1.2 m for S1, S2 and S3 scenarios, respectively. The maximum surface elevation at P4 located in east Xiamen waters reaches 1.4 m for the S1 scenario and 1.7 m for both S2 and S3 scenarios. This indicates that due to the closer proximity to the tsunami sources, the east Xiamen waters may experience greater tsunami wave amplitude in a shorter period and vessels located in these waters may be affected.

4.2. Spatial Distribution of the Maximum Amplitude

Figure 5 displays the way in which the maximum tsunami amplitude is spatially distributed in the near field for each scenario. It shows that tsunami waves propagate along the vertical direction of the fault towards the coastal area of mainland China and the deep-sea area in the southeast for each scenario, respectively. The coastal cities most severely affected by the tsunami in southeastern China are mainly Xiamen, Zhangzhou and Quanzhou. Most of the tsunami propagation to Xiamen is blocked by Kinmen island and Liehyu island, but tsunami waves can still surge into Xiamen city waters via Xiamen Bay and Weitou Bay. Figure 5a shows the maximum amplitude distribution of the tsunami for the S1 scenario, with the maximum wave height reaching about 4 m near the eastern coast of Quanzhou, Kinmen island, and Liehyu island. Binhai Street of Siming district may encounter a maximum tsunami amplitude of about 2 m, and the maximum amplitude near the coast of Haicang Street in Haicang district is about 1 m (Figure 6a). For the S2 scenario, the northeastern part of Zhangzhou, Kinmen island, Liehyu island, and the southern part of Quanzhou are most affected, with the maximum tsunami amplitude reaching about 5 m (Figure 5b). The maximum amplitude reaches 2.5–3 m near shore at Binhai Street and 1.5 m near shore at Haicang Street (Figure 6b). For the S3 scenario, the maximum amplitude at the nearshore of Zhangzhou, Kinmen island, Liehyu island and Quanzhou is about 5 m (Figure 5c). The maximum amplitudes at the coast of Binhai Street and Haicang Street are about 2.5 m and 1.5 m, respectively (Figure 6c). Compared to XF 1, XF 2 and XF 3 are significantly farther away from Xiamen, but the maximum tsunami amplitudes near Xiamen are larger for scenarios S2 and S3. The same results were obtained for the analysis of the surface elevation timeseries for all virtual points (Figure 4). This is because XF 2 and XF 3 are aligned parallel to the coastline, resulting in tsunami energy being able to concentrate more on the coasts of the southeastern Siming district and the southern Haicang district, which are close to Xiamen Bay.

4.3. Tsunami Hazard Analysis

Referring to the Technical Directives for Tsunami Risk Assessment and Zoning of China—Part 3: Tsunami [39], we obtained the tsunami hazard maps of Xiamen for all three scenarios based on tsunami inundation depths. Figure 7a–c show that there are no areas with tsunami inundation depths more than 3 m in Xiamen for all three scenarios. Most of Xiamen has tsunami hazard levels of Level III and IV, with tsunami inundation depths below 1.2 m. For S1 scenario (Figure 7a), the total inundation area of Xiamen is 117.18 km2, and the area at tsunami hazard level II reaches 2.04 km2. For S2 scenario (Figure 7b), the total inundation area of Xiamen is 117.45 km2, and the area at tsunami hazard level II reaches 8.93 km2. For S3 scenario (Figure 7c), the total inundation area of Xiamen is 117.31 km2, and the area at tsunami hazard level II reaches 7.71 km2. The statistical results of the inundation area for the three scenarios indicate that the area at the tsunami hazard level II in Xiamen is larger for the S2 and S3 scenarios; local tsunamis from XF 2 and XF 3 may cause more severe hazards to the coastal areas of Xiamen compared to XF 1. It is recommended to pay more attention to the local earthquakes occurring in XF 2 and XF 3. In addition, Figure 7a–c show that the highest hazard level is level III in Jimei and Tong’an districts, located northwest of Xiamen. This is because most of the tsunami waves propagating towards these two districts are blocked by the Xiang’an, Huli and Siming districts, so the coastal areas of the Jimei and Tong’an districts will not be directly affected by the tsunami. The areas with the tsunami hazard level II are primarily concentrated on the coast of the southern Haicang district, the eastern Siming district, and Xiang’an district, which are in the primary propagation direction of the tsunami. Considering that there are many marinas as well as tourist-preferred beaches along the coast of Haicang district and Siming district, authorities should pay attention to tsunami disaster prevention and mitigation planning in these areas.

5. Discussion

The spatial distribution of the maximum wave amplitude in the coastal areas of Xiamen for the three scenarios indicates that the strike of the fault is a controlling factor for the size and impact range of the tsunami. The more parallel the earthquake fault alignment is to the coastline of the affected area, the greater the nearshore tsunami wave amplitude in the affected area and the higher the tsunami hazard level. This conclusion is consistent with the findings of Hou et al. [40], Mao et al. [41] and Ren et al. [27]. The influence of other earthquake parameters on the results of tsunami simulations has also received attention. Li et al. [30] quantitatively analyzed the influence of the change in fault dip angle and rake angle on the tsunami. They proposed that the increase in dip angle will increase the amplitude of initial negative wave. The change in fault rake angle will affect the vertical seabed displacement, thus determining the size of the tsunami. In the study conducted by Fan et al. [14], the sensitivity of maximum tsunami amplitude and coastal inundation to rake and strike angle was investigated. They deduced that the tsunami hazard of affected area is more influenced by the rake angle than by the strike angle for a local fault based on analysis of the distribution of maximum tsunami amplitude in the near shore. These studies assumed that other parameters remained constant and analyzed only the effect of changes in individual earthquake parameters on the maximum tsunami amplitude or inundation. However, the fault geometry and size that have the greatest impact on the generation and propagation of earthquake-induced tsunamis are jointly determined by earthquake parameters such as strike angle, dip angle, rake angle, fault length, fault width and slip amount [42]. Therefore, to accurately assess the impact of earthquake parameter uncertainty on tsunami hazard assessment, the interaction between the source parameters is also a factor that must be considered.
The results of the tsunami hazard analysis of Xiamen city show that the highest tsunami hazard level is level III in the coastal areas of the Jimei and Tong’an districts, while most of the tsunami hazard level II areas are concentrated in the Siming, Haicang and Xiang’an districts. This indicates that even within the same city, tsunami prevention measures in different regions may vary greatly due to coastal terrain [14,43,44]. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct refined tsunami hazard and risk assessments for important coastal cities and develop specialized emergency plans for high-risk areas to minimize potential significant losses in the future.
Our simulation results suggest that Xiamen would be hit by local tsunamis from XF 1–3 within 1.5 h of the earthquake. Such a short emergency response time requires authorities to issue rapid and accurate tsunami warnings. Traditional tsunami warning methods simulate nearshore tsunami wave amplitude and inundation based on estimates of the seismic slip distribution [45]. This method can provide fast forecasts for earthquake-induced tsunamis, but it is difficult to guarantee the accuracy of the forecasts [46]. Offshore tsunami measurements can provide direct tsunami monitoring information before the tsunami reaches the nearshore [47]. Based on offshore tsunami observations, the source information can be estimated to calculate the tsunami wave field [48], or the tsunami wave field can be constructed directly without considering the source information [49]. Therefore, tsunami warning systems based on offshore observations can provide more accurate tsunami forecasts and are an important complement to traditional warning methods [50]. Currently, coastal countries such as the United States and Japan have established offshore observation networks for rapid and accurate tsunami warning [51,52]. To better ensure the safety of people’s lives and properties, the coastal cities in southeast China should emphasize the construction of tsunami observation networks and tsunami warning systems based on offshore observation in the future.
This paper has several limitations. Since the near-shore bathymetry of Xiamen is not open-source, we chose to simulate tsunami propagation using GEBCO_2022, a currently commonly used open-source bathymetry dataset, but with lower resolution (~460 m). The results of Xie et al. [53] suggest that the tsunami hazard may be over/underestimated using low-resolution near-shore bathymetry data. In the future, we will consider taking higher resolution nearshore bathymetry data to improve the accuracy of tsunami inundation simulations. In addition, tsunami protection facilities such as breakwaters are not considered in the simulation of tsunami inundation. Previous studies have shown that breakwaters can be effective in weakening the energy of near-shore tsunami waves [54,55]. Therefore, the simulated inundation area in this study may be larger than the actual situation. The earthquake parameters used in this study refer to the values provided by Ren et al. [27]. Detailed marine geophysical surveys are necessary to gain a better understanding of the fault geometry characteristics of potential local tsunami sources such as XF 1, XF 2 and XF 3 that could affect Xiamen, and to reduce uncertainties in the assessment of the local tsunami hazard for Xiamen. In addition, the tsunami hazard assessment in this study only considered tsunamis triggered by earthquakes. Wang et al. [4] showed that tsunami wave amplitudes up to 13.0 cm were monitored in and around Lingding Bay in China after the 2022 Tonga volcanic eruption. Tsunami hazard assessment for coastal areas should consider the tsunamis from nonseismic origins in the future.

6. Conclusions

There are multiple local tsunami sources near the continental shelf of the South China Sea that pose a potential tsunami threat to coastal areas. To predict and prevent possible tsunami disasters in the future, it is necessary to carry out the hazard assessment of local tsunami for important coastal cities. In this study, three worst-case credible tsunamigenic scenarios (Mw8.0) from Xiamen fault 1 (XF 1), Xiamen fault 2 (XF 2) and Xiamen fault 3 (XF 3) were selected to assess the local tsunami hazard for Xiamen city. The propagation and inundation of the tsunami for each scenario was simulated based on the GeoClaw model. The simulation results indicated that the tsunamis from XF 1–3 would be the first to hit the coast of Dadeng island in Xiamen within 1.5 h and spread to all coasts of Xiamen about 2 h later. Tsunamis from XF 2 and XF 3 could reach heights exceeding 1.7 m in the east Xiamen water within 1.5 h. This may have an impact on vessels sailing in this area. The highest tsunami hazard of the southern coast of Haicang district and part of the eastern coast of Siming district reached level II, with an inundation depth of 1.2–3.0 m. Since the fault strikes of XF 2 and XF 3 are almost parallel to Xiamen’s coastline, local tsunamis from XF 2 and XF 3 could cause more severe damage. Authorities should pay close attention to the seismic activity of XF 2 and XF 3. This work simulated the propagation of tsunamis triggered by Mw8.0 earthquakes occurring on three offshore faults, revealing the maximum local tsunami inundation depth and hazard that Xiamen city may experience, and provides a typical case for researchers to understand the local tsunami hazard assessment for coastal cities. The results can provide scientific references for the development of tsunami hazard assessment and early warning systems for coastal cities in southeastern China.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.C. and C.X.; methodology, Z.C., W.Q. and C.X.; software, Z.C.; investigation, Z.C., W.Q. and C.X.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.C.; writing—review and editing, W.Q. and C.X.; visualization, Z.C.; supervision, W.Q. and C.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the State Administration of Science, Technology and Industry for National Defence, PRC (No. KJSP2020020303) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42077259).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Randall J. LeVeque of the University of Washington for providing the GeoClaw model. We would also like to thank the three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments, which contributed to the improvement of our manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Smit, A.; Kijko, A.; Stein, A. Probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment from incomplete and uncertain historical catalogues with application to tsunamigenic regions in the Pacific Ocean. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2017, 174, 3065–3081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Tan, H.; Ruffini, G.; Heller, V.; Chen, S. A numerical landslide-tsunami hazard assessment technique applied on hypothetical scenarios at Es Vedrà, Offshore Ibiza. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2018, 6, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Dolgikh, G.; Dolgikh, S.; Ovcharenko, V. Initiation of infrasonic geosphere waves caused by explosive eruption of Hunga Tonga-Hunga Haʻapai Volcano. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, Y.; Wang, P.; Kong, H.; Wong, C.S. Tsunamis in Lingding Bay, China, caused by the 2022 Tonga volcanic eruption. Geophys. J. Int. 2022, 232, 2175–2185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Reid, J.A.; Mooney, W.D. Tsunami occurrence 1900–2020: A global review, with examples from Indonesia. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2023, 180, 1549–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lay, T.; Kanamori, H.; Ammon, C.J.; Nettles, M.; Ward, S.N.; Aster, R.C.; Beck, S.L.; Bilek, S.L.; Brudzinski, M.R.; Butler, R. The great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake of 26 December 2004. Science 2005, 308, 1127–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Tanaka, H.; Tinh, N.X.; Umeda, M.; Hirao, R.; Pradjoko, E.; Mano, A.; Udo, K. Coastal and estuarine morphology changes induced by the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake Tsunami. Coast. Eng. J. 2012, 54, 547–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Horspool, N.; Pranantyo, I.; Griffin, J.; Latief, H.; Natawidjaja, D.H.; Kongko, W.; Cipta, A.; Bustaman, B.; Anugrah, S.D.; Thio, H.K. A probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment for Indonesia. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2014, 14, 3105–3122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Liu, Y.; Ren, Y.; Wen, R.; Wang, H. Probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment for the Southeast Coast of China: Consideration of both regional and local potential sources. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2021, 178, 5061–5084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tonini, R.; Armigliato, A.; Pagnoni, G.; Zaniboni, F.; Tinti, S. Tsunami hazard for the city of Catania, eastern Sicily, Italy, assessed by means of Worst-case Credible Tsunami Scenario Analysis (WCTSA). Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2011, 11, 1217–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Løvholt, F.; Glimsdal, S.; Harbitz, C.B.; Horspool, N.; Smebye, H.; De Bono, A.; Nadim, F. Global tsunami hazard and exposure due to large co-seismic slip. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2014, 10, 406–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Al-Habsi, Z.; Hereher, M.; El-Hussain, I.; Omira, R.; Ana Baptista, M.; Deif, A.; Al-Awadhi, T.; Al-Nasiri, N. Tsunami hazard and risk zoning for Qurayyat in northeast Oman coast: Worst-case credible scenarios along the Makran Subduction Zone, Western Asia. J. Asian Earth Sci. X 2022, 8, 100103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Santos, A.; Fernandes, J.; Mileu, N. Tsunami hazard assessment at Oeiras Municipality, Portugal. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fan, T.; Hou, J.; Xu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, L.; Gao, Y.; Wang, P. Investigation of local tsunami effect on coastal areas: A case study of Putian City, Fujian Province, China. Sustainability 2023, 15, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ren, Z.; Gao, Y.; Ji, X.; Hou, J. Deterministic tsunami hazard assessment and zoning approach using far-field and near-field sources: Study of Cixi County of Zhejiang Province, China. Ocean Eng. 2022, 247, 110487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hou, J.; Li, X.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, P. Tsunami hazard assessment along the Chinese mainland coast from earthquakes in the Taiwan region. Nat. Hazards 2016, 81, 1269–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Feng, X.; Yin, B.; Gao, S.; Wang, P.; Bai, T.; Yang, D. Assessment of tsunami hazard for coastal areas of Shandong Province, China. Appl. Ocean Res. 2017, 62, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hou, J.; Yuan, Y.; Li, T.; Ren, Z. Tsunami hazard analysis for Chinese coast from potential earthquakes in the western North Pacific. Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk 2020, 11, 967–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hui, C.; Ning, L.; Cheng, C. Risk assessment of tsunamis along the Chinese coast due to earthquakes. Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci. 2022, 13, 275–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, L.; Qiu, Q.; Li, Z.; Zhang, P. Tsunami hazard assessment in the South China Sea: A review of recent progress and research gaps. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2022, 65, 783–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pan, W.; Wang, S.; Cai, S. Simulation of potential tsunami hazards in the South China Sea. J. Trop. Ocean. 2009, 28, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ren, Z.; Zhao, X.; Wang, B.; Dias, F.; Liu, H. Characteristics of wave amplitude and currents in South China Sea induced by a virtual extreme tsunami. J. Hydrodyn. 2017, 29, 377–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qiu, Q.; Li, L.; Hsu, Y.J.; Wang, Y.; Chan, C.H.; Switzer, A.D. Revised earthquake sources along Manila trench for tsunami hazard assessment in the South China Sea. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2019, 19, 1565–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Huang, Q.; Jing, H.; Hu, P. Study on the potential tsunami hazard of adjacent trenches in the southeast coast of China. Mar. Environ. Sci. 2019, 38, 594–601. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ma, F.; Zhao, G.; Gao, X.; Niu, X. Spatial distribution of tsunami hazard posed by earthquakes along the Manila Trench. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ren, Y.; Wen, R.; Song, Y. Recent progress of tsunami hazard mitigation in China. Epis. J. Int. Geosci. 2014, 37, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ren, Y.; Wen, R.; Zhang, P.; Yang, Z.; Pan, R.; Li, X. Implications of local sources to probabilistic tsunami hazard analysis in south Chinese coastal area. J. Earthq. Tsunami 2017, 11, 1740001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mak, S.; Chan, L.S. Historical tsunamis in South China. Nat. Hazards 2007, 43, 147–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Peng, C.; Li, Y.; Wu, M. Analysis of seismogenic structure mechanism of the Nanao earthquake in 1918. South China J. Seismol. 2017, 37, 1–14. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, L.; Li, F.; Qiu, Q.; Li, Z.; Zhang, D.; Hui, G. Tsunami simulation of the 1918 Nan’ao earthquake and its implication. Acta Sci. Nat. Univ. Sunyatseni 2022, 61, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Blaser, L.; Krüger, F.; Ohrnberger, M.; Scherbaum, F. Scaling relations of earthquake source parameter estimates with special focus on subduction environment. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 2010, 100, 2914–2926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Aki, K. Generation and propagation of G waves from the Niigata earthquake of June 16, 1964. Part 2. Estimation of earthquake moment, released energy, and stress-strain drop from the G wave spectrum. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Tokyo Univ. 1966, 44, 73–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hanks, T.C.; Kanamori, H. A moment magnitude scale. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 1979, 84, 2348–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Takabatake, T.; St-Germain, P.; Nistor, I.; Stolle, J.; Shibayama, T. Numerical modelling of coastal inundation from Cascadia Subduction Zone tsunamis and implications for coastal communities on western Vancouver Island, Canada. Nat. Hazards 2019, 98, 267–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ren, Z.; Liu, H.; Zhao, X.; Wang, B.; An, C. Effect of kinematic fault rupture process on tsunami propagation. Ocean Eng. 2019, 181, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Riquelme, S.; Schwarze, H.; Fuentes, M.; Campos, J. Near-field effects of earthquake rupture velocity into tsunami runup heights. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2020, 125, e2019JB018946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. LeVeque, R.J.; George, D.L.; Berger, M.J. Tsunami modelling with adaptively refined finite volume methods. Acta Numer. 2011, 20, 211–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Okada, Y. Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 1985, 75, 1135–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. HY/T 0273.3-2021; Technical Directives for Risk Assessment and Zoning of Marine Disaster-Part 3: Tsunami. Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 2021.
  40. Hou, J.; Yu, F.; Wang, P. Numerical study on tsunami inundation for the urban area of Shantou City. Mar. Forecast. 2014, 31, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mao, X.; Zhu, Q.; Wei, Y. Risk analysis of potential regional earthquake tsunami on the coast of Zhejiang Province. Haiyang Xuebao 2015, 37, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Satake, K.; Ishibe, T.; Murotani, S.; Mulia, I.E.; Gusman, A.R. Effects of uncertainty in fault parameters on deterministic tsunami hazard assessment: Examples for active faults along the eastern margin of the Sea of Japan. Earth Planets Space 2022, 74, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Windupranata, W.; Hanifa, N.R.; Nusantara, C.A.D.S.; Aristawati, G.; Arifianto, M.R. Analysis of tsunami hazard in the southern coast of West Java Province-Indonesia. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 618, 012026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hassan, H.M.; Frischknecht, C.; ElGabry, M.N.; Hussein, H.; ElWazir, M. Tsunami hazard and risk assessment for Alexandria (Egypt) based on the maximum credible earthquake. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2020, 162, 103735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ren, Z.; Hou, J.; Wang, P.; Li, T.; Yuan, Y.; Zhao, L. Study and application of the refined tsunami real time warning system including tsunamigenic wave and current. Haiyang Xuebao 2019, 41, 145–155. [Google Scholar]
  46. Cienfuegos, R.; Catalán, P.A.; Urrutia, A.; Benavente, R.; Aránguiz, R.; González, G. What can we do to forecast tsunami hazards in the near field given large epistemic uncertainty in rapid seismic source inversions? Geophys. Res. Lett. 2018, 45, 4944–4955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sheehan, A.F.; Gusman, A.R.; Heidarzadeh, M.; Satake, K. Array observations of the 2012 Haida Gwaii tsunami using Cascadia Initiative absolute and differential seafloor pressure gauges. Seismol. Res. Lett. 2015, 86, 1278–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tsushima, H.; Hino, R.; Fujimoto, H.; Tanioka, Y.; Imamura, F. Near-field tsunami forecasting from cabled ocean bottom pressure data. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2009, 114, B06309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Maeda, T.; Obara, K.; Shinohara, M.; Kanazawa, T.; Uehira, K. Successive estimation of a tsunami wavefield without earthquake source data: A data assimilation approach toward real-time tsunami forecasting. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2015, 42, 7923–7932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, Y.; Tsushima, H.; Satake, K.; Navarrete, P. Review on recent progress in near-field tsunami forecasting using offshore tsunami measurements: Source inversion and data assimilation. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2021, 178, 5109–5128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. González, F.I.; Bernard, E.N.; Meinig, C.; Eble, M.C.; Mofjeld, H.O.; Stalin, S. The NTHMP Tsunameter Network. Nat. Hazards 2005, 35, 25–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mulia, I.E.; Satake, K. Developments of tsunami observing systems in Japan. Front. Earth Sci. 2020, 8, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Xie, X.; Chen, C.; Li, L.; Wu, S.; Yuen, D.A.; Wang, D. Tsunami hazard assessment for atoll islands inside the South China Sea: A case study of the Xisha Archipelago. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2019, 290, 20–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lotfollahi-Yaghin, M.A.; Nassiraei, H. Numerical simulation of tsunami waves forces on coastal structures. J. Oceanogr. 2016, 6, 23–30. [Google Scholar]
  55. Nassiraei, H.; Heidarzadeh, M.; Shafieefar, M. Numerical simulation of long waves (tsunami) forces on caisson breakwaters. Sharif J. Civ. Eng. 2016, 32, 3–12. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Location of the study area. (b) Location of the local tsunami sources considered in present study and historical earthquakes and tsunamis occurred in the vicinity of the southeastern coast of China (1000 BC to 2023 AD). (c) Administrative divisions of Xiamen City and 10 virtual points in the model. XF 1: Xiamen fault 1; XF 2: Xiamen fault 2; XF 3: Xiamen fault 3.
Figure 1. (a) Location of the study area. (b) Location of the local tsunami sources considered in present study and historical earthquakes and tsunamis occurred in the vicinity of the southeastern coast of China (1000 BC to 2023 AD). (c) Administrative divisions of Xiamen City and 10 virtual points in the model. XF 1: Xiamen fault 1; XF 2: Xiamen fault 2; XF 3: Xiamen fault 3.
Jmse 11 01501 g001
Figure 2. Spatial distributions of initial sea surface elevation for S1 (a), S2 (b) and S3 (c) scenarios.
Figure 2. Spatial distributions of initial sea surface elevation for S1 (a), S2 (b) and S3 (c) scenarios.
Jmse 11 01501 g002
Figure 3. Tsunami travel time for S1 (a), S2 (b) and S3 (c) scenarios.
Figure 3. Tsunami travel time for S1 (a), S2 (b) and S3 (c) scenarios.
Jmse 11 01501 g003
Figure 4. Surface elevation timeseries at the 10 virtual points around the Xiamen coast. The black line represents the surface elevation at the virtual point for S1 scenario. The red line represents the surface elevation at the virtual point for S2 scenario. The blue line represents the surface elevation at the virtual point for S3 scenario.
Figure 4. Surface elevation timeseries at the 10 virtual points around the Xiamen coast. The black line represents the surface elevation at the virtual point for S1 scenario. The red line represents the surface elevation at the virtual point for S2 scenario. The blue line represents the surface elevation at the virtual point for S3 scenario.
Jmse 11 01501 g004
Figure 5. Spatial distributions of maximum tsunami amplitude for S1 (a), S2 (b) and S3 (c) scenarios in the near field.
Figure 5. Spatial distributions of maximum tsunami amplitude for S1 (a), S2 (b) and S3 (c) scenarios in the near field.
Jmse 11 01501 g005
Figure 6. Spatial distributions of maximum tsunami amplitude for S1 (a), S2 (b) and S3 (c) scenarios near Xiamen.
Figure 6. Spatial distributions of maximum tsunami amplitude for S1 (a), S2 (b) and S3 (c) scenarios near Xiamen.
Jmse 11 01501 g006
Figure 7. Tsunami hazard maps for S1 (a), S2 (b) and S3 (c) scenarios in terms of tsunami inundation depth.
Figure 7. Tsunami hazard maps for S1 (a), S2 (b) and S3 (c) scenarios in terms of tsunami inundation depth.
Jmse 11 01501 g007
Table 1. Bathymetry and topographic data for tsunami modelling.
Table 1. Bathymetry and topographic data for tsunami modelling.
NameTypeCoordinatesResolution
GEBCO_2022Bathymetric dataGeographic15 arc second (~460 m)
ASTER GDEM V3Topographic dataGeographic1 arc second (~30 m)
Table 2. Notations.
Table 2. Notations.
NotationDefinition
MwSeismic moment magnitude
LLength of the fault plane
WWidth of the fault plane
M0Seismic moment
DAverage coseismic slip
μShear rigidity of the Earth’s crust
tTime
hTotal water depth
bBottom elevation function
uDepth-averaged velocities in x directions
vDepth-averaged velocities in y directions
gGravity acceleration
nManning coefficient
τxBottom friction terms in x directions
τyBottom friction terms in y directions
Table 3. Earthquake parameters used in each scenario.
Table 3. Earthquake parameters used in each scenario.
ScenarioLocationMwLength
(km)
Width
(km)
Strike
(°)
Dip
(°)
Rake
(°)
Depth
(km)
Slip
(m)
S1XF 18.015566586090203.13
S2XF 28.015566576090203.13
S3XF 38.015566536090203.13
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Z.; Qi, W.; Xu, C. Scenario-Based Hazard Assessment of Local Tsunami for Coastal Areas: A Case Study of Xiamen City, Fujian Province, China. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 1501. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11081501

AMA Style

Chen Z, Qi W, Xu C. Scenario-Based Hazard Assessment of Local Tsunami for Coastal Areas: A Case Study of Xiamen City, Fujian Province, China. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2023; 11(8):1501. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11081501

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Zhaoning, Wenwen Qi, and Chong Xu. 2023. "Scenario-Based Hazard Assessment of Local Tsunami for Coastal Areas: A Case Study of Xiamen City, Fujian Province, China" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 11, no. 8: 1501. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11081501

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop