Digitalization in the Maritime Logistics Industry: A Systematic Literature Review of Enablers and Barriers
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methodology
2.1. Phase 1: Planning the Research Process
2.2. Phase 2: Conducting the Review Process
2.3. Phase 3: Reporting and Dissemination
3. Results
3.1. Descriptive Analysis
3.1.1. Bibliometric Analysis
3.1.2. Co-Citation Analysis
3.1.3. Keyword Co-Occurrence Networks Analysis
3.1.4. “Time-Zone” Analysis of Co-Occurrence Keywords
3.2. The Enablers and Barriers to Digitalization in Maritime Logistics
3.2.1. Enablers
Technological Context
- Technology
- Information sharing
- Efficiency
- Security
- Visibility
- Integration
- Risk reduction
Organizational Context
- Awareness
- Cost reduction
- Investment
- Streamlining operations
- Skilled workforce and digitalization knowledge
- Use of data
- Resources and infrastructure
Environmental Context
- Sustainability
- Trade development
- Regulation
- Pandemic
- Competitive environment and market requirements
3.2.2. Barriers
Technological Context
- Data acquisition and inconsistent information flows
- Risk and security
Organizational Context
- Infrastructure and resources
- Limited knowledge
- Reliance on physical documents
- Lack of awareness and resistance to change
- High costs
Environmental Context
- Regulation
- Complexity
- Imbalance of efforts
4. Discussion, Contributions, Limitations, and Implications
4.1. Discussion
4.2. Contribution
4.3. Limitations
4.4. Implications for Research
- Technological context: The maritime sector is experiencing a rapid transformation in its implementation of digitalization [162]. One of the main streams of research is the use of digital technologies [27,38]. While blockchain [18,33,89,119] is at the heart of this transformation, research into the development and adoption of other emerging technologies remains scarce. Despite the increased interest in these topics in prior research, research in the adoption, implementation, and diffusion of these technologies in the maritime context is limited. Case study research [28,46] and empirical study research [25,33] underpinned by relevant theories are suggested to investigate the use of emerging technologies into maritime logistics operations [136].
- Organizational context: Resistance to change is an essential barrier of organizations implementing digital technologies and digitalization [78]. One of the main ideas behind this stream of research is how to motivate organizations in this context to implement digitalization and ensure successful implementation within organizations as well as between supply chain partners. Since the maritime logistics industry is complex due to the involvement of multiple stakeholders across different nations [65], it is expected that successful digitalization should have supply chain partners included to increase the overall operations in this context. Therefore, future studies are suggested to consider other supply chain partners or stakeholders while conducting studies on digitalization in maritime logistics disciplines in future studies. Furthermore, existing research on the organizational barriers to digitalization in maritime logistics has predominantly focused on the factors at the firm level, such as the rigid internal structure and limited investment. However, the role of the non-managerial workforce in the digital transition remains underexplored. Issues such as low levels of digital literacy, resistance to technological change, and insufficient training opportunities can significantly hinder the success of digital adoption at the operational level. Future research could build upon the existing developments, e.g., recent EU-funded initiatives aiming to enhance the digital capabilities of seafarers and shore-based operational personnel, by investigating how organizational support mechanisms and training programs impact the digital readiness from an individual level. Incorporating this perspective would provide a more holistic understanding of organizational dynamics in maritime digitalization.
- Environmental context: Maritime logistics is heavily affected by the external environment of organizations, e.g., regulations [41,45] and pandemics [70,80], suggesting that future research to investigate how different external environments influence digitalization in maritime logistics is necessary. Developing theories that explain the interplay between the environment (e.g., regulations) and innovation in this context could provide valuable insights for both academics, practitioners, and policymakers. Additionally, given the increasing focus on sustainability in global supply chains [2,29], future research could explore the environmental implications of digitalization in maritime logistics. This includes accessing the potential of digitalization to reduce carbon footprints, improve resource efficiency, and enhance overall sustainability practices within the industry. Investigating the long-term environmental benefits and challenges associated with digitalization can help to align industry practices with global sustainability goals [37,79].
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ichimura, Y.; Dalaklis, D.; Kitada, M.; Christodoulou, A. Shipping in the era of digitalization: Mapping the future strategic plans of major maritime commercial actors. Digit. Bus. 2022, 2, 100022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavlinovic, M.; Racic, M.; Misura, A. The Importance of Digitalisation for Sustainable Development of Maritime Industry. Trans. Marit. Sci.-Toms 2023, 12. [Google Scholar]
- Saberi, S.; Kouhizadeh, M.; Sarkis, J.; Shen, L. Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 2117–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Z.; Xie, S.; Dai, H.; Chen, X.; Wang, H. An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigData Congress), Honolulu, HI, USA, 25–30 June 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Maersk. Maersk Spot. Available online: https://www.maersk.com.cn/transportation-services/maersk-spot (accessed on 20 August 2024).
- MSC. Smart Containers. Available online: https://www.msc.com/en/solutions/digital-solutions/smart-containers (accessed on 20 August 2024).
- Balci, G. Digitalization in container shipping: Do perception and satisfaction regarding digital products in a non-technology industry affect overall customer loyalty? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 172, 121016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hirata, E. Service characteristics and customer satisfaction in the container liner shipping industry. Asian J. Shipp. Logist. 2019, 35, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaklis, D.; Varlamis, I.; Giannakopoulos, G.; Varelas, T.J.; Spyropoulos, C.D. Enabling digital twins in the maritime sector through the lens of AI and industry 4.0. Int. J. Inf. Manag. Data Insights 2023, 3, 100178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Senarak, C. Port cybersecurity and threat: A structural model for prevention and policy development. Asian J. Shipp. Logist. 2021, 37, 20–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dalaklis, D.; Christodoulou, A.; Ölcer, A.I.; Ballini, F.; Dalaklis, A.; Lagdami, K. The port of Gothenburg under the influence of the fourth stage of the industrial revolution: Implementing a wide portfolio of digital tools to optimize the conduct of operations. Marit. Technol. Res. 2022, 4, 253844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jensen, T.; Hedman, J.; Henningsson, S. How TradeLens delivers business value with blockchain technology. MIS Q. Exec. 2019, 18, 221–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kouhizadeh, M.; Saberi, S.; Sarkis, J. Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2021, 231, 107831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jović, M.; Radovanović, M.; Radovanović, D. Factors of digital transformation in the maritime transport sector. Transp. Rev. 2022, 42, 525–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balci, G. Digitalization in Container Shipping Services: Critical Resources for Competitive Advantage. J. ETA Marit. Sci. 2021, 9, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raza, Z.; Woxenius, J.; Vural, C.; Lind, M. Digital transformation of maritime logistics: Exploring trends in the liner shipping segment. Comput. Ind. 2023, 145, 103811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tranfield, D.; Denyer, D.; Smart, P. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br. J. Manag 2003, 14, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Surucu-Balci, E.; Iris, Ç.; Balci, G. Digital information in maritime supply chains with blockchain and cloud platforms: Supply chain capabilities, barriers, and research opportunities. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2024, 198, 122978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Webster, J.; Watson, R.T. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Q. 2002, 26, xiii–xxiii. [Google Scholar]
- Daneshvar Kakhki, M.; Gargeya, V.B. Information systems for supply chain management: A systematic literature analysis. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 5318–5339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerow, J.E.; Grover, V.; Thatcher, J.; Roth, P.L. Looking Toward the Future of IT-Business Strategic Alignment Through the Past: A Meta-Analysis. MIS Q. 2014, 38, 1059–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madanaguli, A.; Parida, V.; Sjödin, D.; Oghazi, P. Literature review on industrial digital platforms: A business model perspective and suggestions for future research. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2023, 194, 122606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, C.; Wang, L. Mapping digital innovation: A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2023, 194, 122706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tornatzky, L.G.; Fleischer, M. The Process of Technological Innovation; Lexington Books: Lexington, MA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Zeng, F.; Chan, H.; Pawar, K. The adoption of open platform for container bookings in the maritime supply chain. Transp. Res. Part E-Logist. Transp. Rev. 2020, 141, 102019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pu, S.; Lam, J.S.L. Blockchain adoptions in the maritime industry: A conceptual framework. Marit. Policy Manag. 2021, 48, 777–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tijan, E.; Jović, M.; Aksentijević, S.; Pucihar, A. Digital transformation in the maritime transport sector. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 170, 120879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Göçer, A.; Altuntas Vural, C.; Lind, F. An ICT-based start-up entering maritime logistics networks: Facilitation of value cocreation patterns. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2022, 38, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forti, N.; D’Afflisio, E.; Braca, P.; Millefiori, L.; Willett, P. Next-Gen Intelligent Situational Awareness Systems for Maritime Surveillance and Autonomous Navigation [Point of View]. Proc. IEEE 2022, 110, 1532–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lambourdiere, E.; Corbin, E. Blockchain and maritime supply-chain performance: Dynamic capabilities perspective. Worldw. Hosp. Tour. Themes 2020, 12, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Senarak, C. Shipping-collaboration model for the new generation of container port in innovation district: A case of Eastern Economic Corridor. Asian J. Shipp. Logist. 2020, 36, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akyuz, E.; Cicek, K.; Celik, M. A comparative research of machine learning impact to future of maritime transportation. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019, 158, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.; Lin, M. The impact of digitalization and digital logistics platform adoption on organizational performance in maritime logistics of taiwan. Marit. Policy Manag. 2023, 51, 1884–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kapkaeva, N.; Gurzhiy, A.; Maydanova, S.; Levina, A. Digital Platform for Maritime Port Ecosystem: Port of Hamburg Case. Int. Sci. Sib. Transp. Forum—TransSiberia 2021, 54, 909–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martelli, M.; Virdis, A.; Gotta, A.; Cassarà, P.; di Summa, M. An Outlook on the Future Marine Traffic Management System for Autonomous Ships. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 157316–157328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, Y.; Li, K.X.; Qi, G.; Jin, M. Game relations between platform enterprises and participants of digital interaction-sharing platforms in the maritime logistics industry. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2023, 178, 103292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blažina, A.; Ivče, R.; Mohović, Đ.; Mohović, R. Analysis of empty container management. Pomorstvo 2022, 36, 305–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luchenko, D.; Georgiievskyi, I.; Bielikova, M. Challenges and Developments in the Public Administration of Autonomous Shipping. Lex Portus 2023, 9, 20–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janssen, T.; Baldauf, M.; Claresta, G. From Ship to Shore-Studies Into Potential Practical Consequences of Autonomous Shipping on VTS Operation and Training. TransNav-Int. J. Mar. Navig. Saf. Sea Transp. 2023, 17, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mekkaoui, S.E.; Benabbou, L.; Berrado, A. Machine Learning Models for Efficient Port Terminal Operations: Case of Vessels’ Arrival Times Prediction. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2022, 55, 3172–3177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wedemeier, J.; Wolf, L. Navigating Rough Waters: Global Shipping and Challenges for the North Range Ports. Intereconomics 2022, 57, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aiello, G.; Giallanza, A.; Mascarella, G. Towards Shipping 4.0. A preliminary gap analysis. Procedia Manuf. 2020, 42, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, Y.; Chen, Z.; McNeil, L. Digital empowerment for shipping development: A framework for establishing a smart shipping index system. Marit. Policy Manag. 2022, 49, 850–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sullivan, B.P.; Desai, S.; Sole, J.; Rossi, M.; Ramundo, L.; Terzi, S. Maritime 4.0—Opportunities in Digitalization and Advanced Manufacturing for Vessel Development. Procedia Manuf. 2020, 42, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wohlleber, A.J.; Bock, M.; Birkel, H.; Hartmann, E. Implementing Vital Dynamic Capabilities to Succeed in Digital Transformation: A Multiple-Case Study in Maritime Container Shipping. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2022, 71, 13627–13645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, X.; Kong, Y.; Cheng, L. Strategies and mechanisms for building digital resilience of container shipping platform in crisis situations: A network orchestration perspective. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2023, 246, 106887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paulauskas, V.; Filina-dawidowicz, L.; Paulauskas, D. Ports digitalization level evaluation. Sensors 2021, 21, 6134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alop, A. The Main Challenges and Barriers to the Successful “Smart Shipping”. TransNav-Int. J. Mar. Navig. Saf. Sea Transp. 2019, 13, 521–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, S. Financial challenges in adopting digital technologies in maritime logistics. J. Marit. Econ. 2019, 36, 178–192. [Google Scholar]
- Dalaklis, D.; Katsoulis, G.; Kitada, M.; Schröder-Hinrichs, J.-U.; Ölcer, A.I. A “Net-Centric” conduct of navigation and ship management. Marit. Technol. Res. 2020, 2, 90–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, N.A.; Jakobsen, J.J.; Weber, R.; Lundh, M.; MacKinnon, S.N. Assessing a maritime service website prototype in a ship bridge simulator: Navigators’ experiences and perceptions of novel e-Navigation solutions. WMU J. Marit. Aff. 2018, 17, 521–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dashtimanesh, A.; Ghaemi, M.H.; Wang, Y.; Karczewski, A.; Bilandi, R.N.; Hirdaris, S. Digitalization of High Speed Craft Design and Operation Challenges and Opportunities. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2022, 200, 566–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koh, L.; Li, X.; Wang, X.; Yuen, K. Key knowledge domains for maritime shipping executives in the digital era: A knowledge-based view approach. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2022, 36, 1646–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lipis, E.; Schislyaeva, E. Qualification and mobility of transport complex personnel in the digitalization of shipbuilding. Transp. Res. Procedia 2022, 63, 2138–2150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nsikan, J.; Micheal, R.; Mercy, O.; Adebukola, A.; Briggs, I.; Inegbedion, D. Robust practices for managing maritime supply chain risks: A survey of Nigeria’s seaports. Asian J. Shipp. Logist. 2023, 39, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolomiiets, Y. Sustainability challenges for the modern shipping: Legal analysis. Lex Portus 2019, 19, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Im, I.; Shin, D.; Jeong, J. Components for Smart Autonomous Ship Architecture Based on Intelligent Information Technology. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2018, 134, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Senarak, C. Cybersecurity knowledge and skills for port facility security officers of international seaports: Perspectives of IT and security personnel. Asian J. Shipp. Logist. 2021, 37, 345–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, R.; Wang, S.; Zhen, L.; Laporte, G. Emerging approaches applied to maritime transport research: Past and future. Commun. Transp. Res. 2021, 1, 100011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melnyk, O.; Onyshchenko, S.; Onishchenko, O.; Lohinov, O.; Ocheretna, V. Integral Approach to Vulnerability Assessment of Ship’s Critical Equipment and Systems. Trans. Marit. Sci. 2023, 12, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nielsen, R.E.; Papageorgiou, D.; Nalpantidis, L.; Jensen, B.T.; Blanke, M. Machine learning enhancement of manoeuvring prediction for ship Digital Twin using full-scale recordings. Ocean Eng. 2022, 257, 111579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jovanovic, M.; Kostic, N.; Sebastian, I.; Sedej, T. Managing a blockchain-based platform ecosystem for industry-wide adoption: The case of TradeLens. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022, 184, 121981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giering, J.; Dyck, A. Maritime Digital Twin architecture A concept for holistic Digital Twin application for shipbuilding and shipping. at-Automatisierungstechnik 2021, 69, 1081–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perera, L.; Mo, B. Ship performance and navigation information under high-dimensional digital models. J Ournal Mar. Sci. Technol. 2020, 25, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, F.; Chan, H.; Pawar, K. The effects of inter- and intraorganizational factors on the adoption of electronic booking systems in the maritime supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2021, 236, 108119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aksentijević, S.; Tijan, E.; Kapidani, N.; Žgaljić, D. Dynamic Smart Numbering of Modular Cargo Containers. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hafeez, W.; Suominen, J.; Sairanen, T.; Gorle, J. Cloud-based platform to enable autonomous container handling. Transp. Res. Procedia 2023, 72, 3205–3211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mandal, J.; Goswami, A.; Kumari, S.; Mishra, N. A multi-agent framework for container booking and slot allocation in maritime shipping. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2024, 62, 3044–3058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urciuoli, L. An algorithm for improved ETAs estimations and potential impacts on supply chain decision making. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 25, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodrigue, J.P.; Verny, J.; Oulmakki, O.; Jbill, N. Container shortages under the covid-19 pandemic: The role of digital technologies. Transp. Res. Procedia 2023, 72, 3769–3776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Behforouzi, M.; Dadwal, S.D.S.; Hassan, K.; Tugsan, A.; Mostafa, E.; Ghoneim, N.I.; Soltani, H.R. Implementing Digitalization and Authentication of Seafarer’s Identification and Certification in the Sultanate of Oman. J. Marit. Res. 2022, 19, 68–76. [Google Scholar]
- Seo, J.; Lee, B.K.; Jeon, Y. Digitalization strategies and evaluation of maritime container supply chains. Bus. Process Manag. J. 2023, 29, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Mekkaoui, S.; Benabbou, L.; Caron, S.; Berrado, A. Deep Learning-Based Ship Speed Prediction for Intelligent Maritime Traffic Management. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, H.; Zhang, F.; Gu, Y. A Stackelberg game based two-stage framework to make decisions of freight rate for container shipping lines in the emerging blockchain-based market. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2021, 149, 102303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, C.; Xu, J.; Miller-Hooks, E.; Zhou, W.; Chen, C.-H.; Lee, L.H.; Chew, E.P.; Li, H. Analytics with digital-twinning: A decision support system for maintaining a resilient port. Decis. Support Syst. 2021, 143, 113496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Li, G.; Hatledal, L.; Chu, Y.; Ellefsen, A.; Han, P.; Major, P.; Skulstad, R.; Wang, T.; Hildre, H. A Digital Twin of the Research Vessel Gunnerus for Lifecycle Services: Outlining Key Technologies. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 2023, 30, 6–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olapoju, O.M. Autonomous ships, port operations, and the challenges of African ports. Marit. Technol. Res. 2023, 5, 260194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suvadarshini, P.; Dandapat, P. Digitalizing the maritime supply chain: The case of Rotterdam’s port call operations. J. Inf. Technol. Teach. Cases 2023, 13, 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heikkilä, M.; Saarni, J.; Saurama, A. Innovation in Smart Ports: Future Directions of Digitalization in Container Ports. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Przybyłowski, A.; Suchanek, M.; Miszewski, P. COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on a Global Liner Shipping Company Employee Work Digitalization. TransNav 2022, 16, 759–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petrenko, O.; Raicheva, L.; Horban, A.; Tykhonina, I.; Nechyporuk, A.; Sodoma, R. Main routes for improving the efficiency of maritime transport in the face of negative externalities. Ad Alta—J. Interdiscip. Res. 2023, 13, 47–51. [Google Scholar]
- Aiello, G.; Giallanza, A.; Vacante, S.; Fasoli, S.; Mascarella, G. Propulsion Monitoring System for Digitized Ship Management: Preliminary Results from a Case Study. Procedia Manuf. 2020, 42, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Storms, K.; Sys, C.; Vanelslander, T.; Van Deuren, R. Demurrage and detention: From operational challenges towards solutions. J. Shipp. Trade 2023, 8, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iman, N.; Amanda, M.T.; Angela, J. Digital transformation for maritime logistics capabilities improvement: Cases in Indonesia. Mar. Econ. Manag. 2022, 5, 188–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salsas, J.; Saurí, S.; Raventós, E.; Rúa, C.; Torrent, J. Emerging Trends Defining the Future Role of Ports: Application of the Delphi Method. Transp. Res. Rec. 2022, 2676, 571–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahbakhsh, M.; Emad, G.R.; Cahoon, S. Industrial revolutions and transition of the maritime industry: The case of Seafarer’s role in autonomous shipping. Asian J. Shipp. Logist. 2022, 38, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaczerska, D.; Kizielewicz, J.; Skrzeszewska, K. Digital Transformation in Ferry Shipping-Case Study in the Baltic Sea Region. TransNav-Int. J. Mar. Navig. Saf. Sea Transp. 2023, 17, 553–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beškovnik, B.; Zanne, M.; Golnar, M. Dynamic Changes in Port Logistics Caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C. Maritime shipping digitalization: Blockchain-based technology applications, future improvements, and intention to use. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2019, 131, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bui, K.; Perera, L. Advanced data analytics for ship performance monitoring under localized operational conditions. Ocean Eng. 2021, 235, 109392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fahim, P.; Rezaei, J.; Jayaraman, R.; Poulin, M.; Montreuil, B.; Tavasszy, L. The Physical Internet and Maritime Ports: Ready for the Future? IEEE Eng. Manag. Rev. 2021, 49, 136–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, Q.; Liu, Y.; Dong, Y.; Li, T.; Li, W. A digital twin framework for real-time ship routing considering decarbonization regulatory compliance. Ocean Eng. 2023, 278, 114407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, R.; Wu, S.; Jin, Y.; Cao, J.; Wang, S. Efficient and explainable ship selection planning in port state control. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2022, 145, 103924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, T.-E.; Perera, L.P.; Sollid, M.-P.; Batalden, B.-M.; Sydnes, A.K. Safety challenges related to autonomous ships in mixed navigational environments. WMU J. Marit. Aff. 2022, 21, 141–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Selvaduray, M.; Suhrab, M.I.R.; Somu, R.; Jeevan, J.; Mohd Salleh, N.H.; Zain, R.M. The fourth industrial revolution: A catalyst for regional development in Malaysian seaport sector. Aust. J. Marit. Ocean Aff. 2023, 15, 284–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedersen, T.A.; Glomsrud, J.A.; Ruud, E.-L.; Simonsen, A.; Sandrib, J.; Eriksen, B.-O.H. Towards simulation-based verification of autonomous navigation systems. Saf. Sci. 2020, 129, 104799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fjørtoft, K.; Parvasi, S.P.; Nesheim, D.A.; Lien Wennerberg, L.A.; Mørkrid, O.E.; Psaraftis, H.N. Assessing the resilience of sustainable autonomous shipping: New methodology, challenges, opportunities. Clean. Logist. Supply Chain. 2023, 9, 100126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Defraeye, T.; Tagliavini, G.; Wu, W.; Prawiranto, K.; Schudel, S.; Assefa Kerisima, M.; Verboven, P.; Bühlmann, A. Digital twins probe into food cooling and biochemical quality changes for reducing losses in refrigerated supply chains. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 149, 778–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasan, A.; Widyotriatmo, A.; Fagerhaug, E.; Osen, O. Predictive digital twins for autonomous surface vessels. Ocean Eng. 2023, 288, 116046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chit, T.W.; Toro, C.; Lim, H.C.; Muthu, R. Scalable Remote Cloud Data Center for Vessel Equipment Predictive Maintenance Service-as-a-Product (SaaP). Procedia Comput. Sci. 2023, 225, 2826–2834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altan, Y.C.; Otay, E.N. Spatial mapping of encounter probability in congested waterways using AIS. Ocean Eng. 2018, 164, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peynirci, E. The rise of emerging technologies: A quantitative-based research on “maritime single window” in Turkey. Themed Vol. Transp. Effic. 2023, 46, 100770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larsen, M.; Lund, M.; Bjorneseth, F. A model of factors influencing deck officers’ cyber risk perception in offshore operations. Marit. Transp. Res. 2022, 3, 100065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agarwala, P.; Chhabra, S.; Agarwala, N. Using digitalisation to achieve decarbonisation in the shipping industry. J. Int. Marit. Saf. Environ. Aff. Shipp. 2021, 5, 161–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonzalez, O.; Koivisto, H.; Mustonen, J.; Keinänen-Toivola, M. Digitalization in Just-In-Time Approach as a Sustainable Solution for Maritime Logistics in the Baltic Sea Region. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanchez-Gonzalez, P.; Díaz-Gutiérrez, D.; Núñez-Rivas, L. Digitalizing Maritime Containers Shipping Companies: Impacts on Their Processes. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kapalidis, C.; Karamperidis, S.; Watson, T.; Koligiannis, G. A Vulnerability Centric System of Systems Analysis on the Maritime Transportation Sector Most Valuable Assets: Recommendations for Port Facilities and Ships. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brrar, S.; Lee, E.; Yip, T.L. An Exploratory Study of the Critical Success Factors of the Global Shipping Industry in the Digital Era. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2023, 18, 795–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saafi, S.; Vikhrova, O.; Fodor, G.; Hosek, J.; Andreev, S. AI-Aided Integrated Terrestrial and Non-Terrestrial 6G Solutions for Sustainable Maritime Networking. IEEE Netw. 2022, 36, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Yang, B. Analysis on the evolution of shipping logistics service supply chain market structure under the application of blockchain technology. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2022, 53, 101714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fahim, P.B.M.; Martinez de Ubago Alvarez de Sotomayor, M.; Rezaei, J.; van Binsbergen, A.; Nijdam, M.; Tavasszy, L. On the evolution of maritime ports towards the Physical Internet. Futures 2021, 134, 102834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hofmann, W.; Branding, F. Implementation of an IoT- and Cloud-based Digital Twin for Real-Time Decision Support in Port Operations. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2019, 52, 2104–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grønsund, T.; Aanestad, M. Augmenting the algorithm: Emerging human-in-the-loop work configurations. Strateg. Perspect. Digit. Work Organ. Transform. 2020, 29, 101614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demirel, E. Maritime Education and Training in the Digital Era. Univers. J. Educ. Res. 2020, 8, 4129–4142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyer, C.; Gerlitz, L.; Henesey, L. Cross-Border Capacity-Building for Port Ecosystems in Small and Medium-Sized Baltic Ports. Taltech J. Eur. Stud. 2021, 11, 113–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, G.; Cai, J.; Rytter, N.; Lützen, M. A Practical Data Quality Assessment Method for Raw Data in Vessel Operations. J. Mar. Sci. Appl. 2023, 22, 370–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peoples, C.; Moore, A.; Georgalas, N. Port Sustainability as a Service: The Design of Bespoke Service Level Agreements (SLAs) to Improve Operational Efficiency at Harbours by Prioritising Social Satisfaction. Front. Sustain. 2022, 3, 928994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flikkema, M.; Will, R.; Polman, A.-J.; Fortin, T.; van Meijeren, J.; Dalhuisen, M.; Graugaard, C.; Streng, M. MAGPIE: Towards the European Green port of the Future. Transp. Res. Procedia 2023, 72, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pu, S.; Lam, J. Greenhouse gas impact of digitalizing shipping documents: Blockchain vs. Centralized systems. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2021, 97, 102942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, S.; Chen, P.; Du, Y. Blockchain adoption in container shipping: An empirical study on barriers, and recommendations. Mar. Policy 2023, 155, 105724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.; Mangla, S.K.; Kumar, P. Using data analytics for operational risk management in maritime supply chains. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2020, 137, 101923. [Google Scholar]
- Brown, S. The impact of trade development on digital technologies in maritime logistics. Marit. Stud. 2019, 26, 456–468. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, H. The impact of COVID-19 on digitalization in maritime logistics. J. Logist. Supply Chain Manag. 2021, 40, 175–188. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, K. The economic impact of digital technologies on maritime logistics. J. Marit. Financ. 2020, 22, 78–92. [Google Scholar]
- Hvolby, H.-H.; Steger-Jensen, K.; Bech, A.; Vestergaard, S.; Svensson, C.; Neagoe, M. Information exchange and block chains in short sea maritime supply chains. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2021, 181, 722–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Notteboom, T.; Pallis, A.A.; Rodrigue, J.P. Port Economics, Management and Policy; Routledge: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Tao, F.; Cheng, J.; Zhang, H. Digital twin-driven product design framework. J. Manuf. Syst. 2018, 94, 3563–3573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanwal, K.; Shi, W.; Kontovas, C.; Yang, Z.; Chang, C. Maritime cybersecurity: Are onboard systems ready? Marit. Policy Manag. 2024, 51, 484–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bielawski, A.; Lazarowska, A. Discussing cybersecurity in maritime transportation. Marit. Technol. Res. 2021, 4, 252151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mrakovic, I.; Vojinovic, R. Maritime Cyber Security Analysis—How to Reduce Threats? Trans. Marit. Sci. 2019, 8, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hult, C.; Praetorius, G.; Sandberg, C. On the Future of Maritime Transport—Discussing Terminology and Timeframes. TransNav-Int. J. Mar. Navig. Saf. Sea Transp. 2019, 13, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vasanthan, C.; Nguyen, D.T. Combining Supervised Learning and Digital Twin for Autonomous Path-planning. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2021, 54, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hagaseth, M.; Rødseth, Ø.J.; Krogstad, T.; Bakke, M. A New Architectural Framework for Digitalization of Maritime Intelligent Transport Systems. TransNav 2023, 17, 769–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodrigue, J.P.; Notteboom, T. The Geography of Transport Systems; Routledge: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Ben-Daya, M.; Hassini, E.; Bahroun, Z. Internet of Things and supply chain management: A literature review. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 4719–4742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, F.; Chan, H.K.; Pawar, K. Exploring the adoption of e-commerce platform for container shipping bookings. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2024, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raza, S.; Bhatti, Z.A.; Khalid, M. Opportunities and challenges of digitalization in liner shipping. Marit. Policy Manag. 2023, 50, 231–250. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, J.; Wu, J.; Tsai, H. Leveraging machine learning for efficient maritime logistics operations. J. Transp. Eng. 2021, 147, 04021013. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, X.; Hu, R.; Luo, K.; Wu, H.; Biancardo, S.A.; Zheng, Y.; Xian, J. Intelligent ship route planning via an A* search model enhanced double-deep Q-network. Ocean Eng. 2025, 327, 120956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Q.; Zhong, Y.; Deng, H.; Wang, X.; Chen, X. Scheduling on tractor and trailer transportation considering the influence of disrupted events based on the contract net and simulated annealing algorithm. Digit. Transp. Saf. 2024, 3, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Zhao, P.; Qiao, S. Smartness-induced transport inequality: Privacy concern, lacking knowledge of smartphone use and unequal access to transport information. Transp. Policy 2020, 99, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kechagias, E.P.; Chatzistelios, G.; Papadopoulos, G.A.; Apostolou, P. Digital transformation of the maritime industry: A cybersecurity systemic approach. Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 2022, 37, 100526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, Z.P.; Wu, X.Y.; Cao, B.B. Considering the traceability awareness of consumers: Should the supply chain adopt the blockchain technology? Ann. Oper. Res. 2020, 309, 837–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antonopoulos, A.; Karakostas, B.; Katsoulakos, T.; Mavrakos, A.; Tsaousis, T. A digital twin enabled decision support framework for ship operational optimization towards decarbonization. In Proceedings of Eighth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology; Springer: Singapore, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Queiroz, M.M.; Telles, R.; Bonilla, S.H. Blockchain and supply chain management integration: A systematic review of the literature. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2019, 24, 698–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Y.; Li, Z.; Mou, J.; Hu, W.; Li, L.; Wang, B. Collision-avoidance path planning for multi-ship encounters considering ship manoeuvrability and COLREGs. Transp. Saf. Environ. 2021, 3, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Issa, A.; Hatiboglu, B.; Bildstein, A.; Bauernhansl, T. Industrie 4.0 roadmap: Framework for digital transformation based on the concepts of capability maturity and alignment. Procedia Cirp 2018, 72, 973–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fitzgerald, M.; Kruschwitz, N.; Bonnet, D.; Welch, M. Embracing digital technology: A new strategic imperative. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2014, 55, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Rodrigue, J.P.; Notteboom, T. The digital transformation of maritime transport. Transp. Rev. 2020, 40, 487–500. [Google Scholar]
- Heilig, L.; Lalla-Ruiz, E.; Voß, S. Digital transformation in maritime ports: Analysis and a game theoretic framework. Netnomics Econ. Res. Electron. Netw. 2017, 18, 227–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, P.T.W.; Lam, J.S.L. Developing the fifth generation port concept for the next generation of port management. J. Shipp. Trade 2016, 1, 186. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, W. Complexity in maritime logistics and the need for digital capabilities. J. Transp. Res. 2021, 45, 210–225. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson, R. Maersk’s digital platform development. J. Int. Trade 2019, 18, 300–315. [Google Scholar]
- Lam, J.S.L.; Zhang, X. Innovative solutions for enhancing customer value in liner shipping. Transp. Policy 2019, 82, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basnet, S.; BahooToroody, A.; Chaal, M.; Lahtinen, J.; Bolbot, V.; Valdez Banda, O.A. Risk analysis methodology using STPA-based Bayesian network- applied to remote pilotage operation. Ocean Eng. 2023, 270, 113569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, S.; Chen, P.; Du, Y. Risk assessment of maritime container shipping blockchain-integrated systems: An analysis of multi-event scenarios. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2022, 163, 102764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, A. Data exploitation challenges in maritime logistics. J. Marit. Inform. 2020, 25, 147–159. [Google Scholar]
- Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Perano, M.; Cammarano, A.; Varriable, V.; Del Regno, C.; Michelino, F.; Caputo, M. Embracing supply chain digitalization and unphysicalization to enhance supply chain performance: A conceptual framework. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2023, 53, 628–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pournader, M.; Shi, Y.; Seuring, S.; Koh, S.C. Blockchain applications in supply chains, transport and logistics: A systematic review of the literature. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 2063–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cichosz, M.; Wallenburg, C.M.; Knemeyer, A.M. Digital transformation at logistics service providers: Barriers, successful factors and leading practices. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2020, 31, 209–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuo, H.; Chen, T.; Yang, C. The effects of institutional pressures on shipping digital transformation in Taiwan. Marit. Bus. Rev. 2022, 7, 175–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Years | The Number of Publications per Year |
---|---|
2018 | 4 |
2019 | 10 |
2020 | 11 |
2021 | 22 |
2022 | 35 |
2023 | 35 |
Total | 117 |
Name of Journal | The Number of Published Articles |
---|---|
Ocean Engineering | 8 |
The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics | 6 |
Transportation Research Procedia | 5 |
Procedia Computer Science | 5 |
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review | 5 |
TransNav-The International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation | 5 |
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering | 4 |
Maritime Technology and Research | 4 |
Maritime Policy and Management | 3 |
Others | 72 |
Enablers | |||||
Technological context | No. of papers | Organizational context | No. of papers | Environmental context | No. of papers |
Technology | 44 | Awareness | 14 | Sustainability | 22 |
Information Sharing | 10 | Cost Reduction | 30 | Trade Development | 2 |
Efficiency | 34 | Investment | 2 | Regulation | 5 |
Security | 12 | Streamlining Operation | 11 | Pandemic | 12 |
Visibility | 18 | Skilled Workforce and Digitalization Knowledge | 12 | Competitive Environment and Market Requirement | 15 |
Integration | 4 | Use of Data | 8 | ||
Risk reduction | 22 | Resource and Infrastructure | 3 | ||
Barriers | |||||
Technological context | No. of papers | Organizational context | No. of papers | Environmental context | No. of papers |
Data Acquisition and Inconsistent Information Flows | 11 | Infrastructure and Resources | 4 | Regulation | 11 |
Risk and Security | 26 | Limited Knowledges | 4 | Complexity | 10 |
Reliance on Physical Documents | 3 | Imbalance | 3 | ||
Lack of Awareness and Resistance to change | 11 | ||||
High Cost | 1 |
Group | Factors | Comments | Sources |
---|---|---|---|
Enablers in technological context | Technology | The maritime logistics sector is undergoing a transformation by introducing new technologies. | [1,2,7,9,10,11,16,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65] |
Information sharing | Digitalization offers the maritime logistics sector more opportunities to facilitate the information sharing. | [25,30,50,66,67,68,69,70,71,72] | |
Efficiency | Digitalization provides shipping industry with efficiency. | [7,9,10,11,16,31,32,34,36,40,41,43,44,47,67,68,70,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88] | |
Security | Digitalization can prevent piracy, kidnapping, or other potential hazards about security. | [29,32,33,34,44,47,66,71,77,81,87,89] | |
Visibility | Digitalization changed the maritime logistics industry by driving information visibility and efficiency | [2,9,16,28,30,34,36,65,66,69,70,73,74,83,84,85,90,91] | |
Integration | Integration from digitalization is the one of most important resources for competitive advantage. | [7,28,30,68] | |
Risk reduction | Digitalization is able to reduce operational risks and errors and facilitate safety as well as reliability, such as navigation safety. | [2,34,35,38,44,66,70,71,73,75,76,86,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101] | |
Enablers in organizational context | Awareness | The managers can realize the importance of applying digitalization so that it can be promoted. | [7,25,50,51,65,77,80,84,89,102,103,104,105,106] |
Cost reduction | Actors will be motivated by the cost reduction from digitalization. | [2,16,28,29,30,34,36,38,43,44,47,48,56,66,68,69,75,76,77,81,85,89,94,95,96,107,108,109,110] | |
Investment | Introducing new digital technologies means organizations need enough investments and funds to digitize. | [30,95] | |
Streamlining operation | Digitalization can optimize operations, improve efficiencies and save operational times. | [34,36,47,52,69,78,84,89,107,111,112] | |
Skilled workforce and digitalization knowledge | Introducing digitalization means more technical personnels are required. Digitalization knowledge is the most import factor for maritime shipping executives. | [1,37,38,39,47,53,58,86,99,113,114,115] | |
Use of data | The operations in ports and ships produce lots of data, offering an opportunity to use digitalization to handle issues. | [40,42,44,47,72,86,90,116] | |
Resource and infrastructure | Digitalization needs sufficient resources and qualified infrastructures to support it. | [77,117,118] | |
Enablers in environmental context | Sustainability | Digitalization needs to respond to the call for green and sustainable development in the world. | [2,16,29,31,32,36,37,38,40,44,53,63,70,73,78,79,86,92,96,104,109,119] |
Trade development | The trade level and trade development will facilitate the adoption of new technologies. | [70,77] | |
Regulation | Regulations promote the adoption of digitalization in the maritime logistics sector. | [2,38,44,45,120] | |
Pandemic | The pandemic enhanced the requirements for faster digitalization in the logistics sector. | [2,7,16,33,46,53,70,80,85,86,88,119] | |
Competitive environment and market requirement | Rising competition and constantly evolving needs are enabling the digitalization in the maritime logistics sector. Market pressures require actors like shipyards and carriers to respond to the call of the digital era to satisfy market and customers’ needs. | [11,12,16,25,39,44,47,55,79,117,121,122,123,124,125] |
Group | Factors | Comments | Sources |
---|---|---|---|
Barriers in technological context | Data acquisition and inconsistent information flows | The adoption of new technologies in the maritime logistics sector is limited due to the data acquisition in this field being narrow and complex. Limited information is a weakness of the digitalization level of ports or terminals. | [28,30,34,47,50,51,65,88,97,105,110] |
Risk and security | The development of digitalization leads to growing risks. One of the major concerns in maritime shipping computing is vulnerability for cyber security. | [9,10,16,25,30,36,42,49,62,66,77,78,81,84,86,93,94,97,103,107,120,126,127,128,129,130] | |
Barriers in organizational context | Infrastructure and resources | A lack of infrastructure development influences new technology implementation in ports. | [16,47,78,91] |
Limited knowledges | Employees who lack knowledge of various systems and how to operate them will be a crucial challenge for maritime logistics companies’ digitalization. | [37,44,97,110] | |
Reliance on physical documents | Digitalization level of the maritime logistics sector was left behind because it still requires significant manual work. | [28,30,78] | |
Lack of awareness and resilience to change | There is resistance to the introduction of technology in the maritime logistics domain or there is a lack of preparedness to follow technical innovation. | [16,37,48,78,79,82,89,93,117,120,131] | |
High cost | Introducing new digital technologies means organizations need enough investments and funds to digitize. | [81] | |
Barriers in environmental context | Regulation | Lack of sufficient transport policy to support ports’ development and management has become a problem. | [36,38,47,65,91,95,111,120,129,132,133] |
Complexity | The maritime logistics sector has a huge amount of data, and its external conditions increase the complexity. | [16,25,40,42,48,73,83,117,120,132] | |
Imbalance | Digitalization in every corner of one country may be imbalanced, which results in high costs and low competitiveness. | [42,66,84] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zeng, F.; Chen, A.; Xu, S.; Chan, H.K.; Li, Y. Digitalization in the Maritime Logistics Industry: A Systematic Literature Review of Enablers and Barriers. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13, 797. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13040797
Zeng F, Chen A, Xu S, Chan HK, Li Y. Digitalization in the Maritime Logistics Industry: A Systematic Literature Review of Enablers and Barriers. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2025; 13(4):797. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13040797
Chicago/Turabian StyleZeng, Fangli, Anqi Chen, Shuojiang Xu, Hing Kai Chan, and Yusong Li. 2025. "Digitalization in the Maritime Logistics Industry: A Systematic Literature Review of Enablers and Barriers" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 13, no. 4: 797. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13040797
APA StyleZeng, F., Chen, A., Xu, S., Chan, H. K., & Li, Y. (2025). Digitalization in the Maritime Logistics Industry: A Systematic Literature Review of Enablers and Barriers. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 13(4), 797. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13040797