Next Article in Journal
Pressure Signal Analysis for the Characterization of High-Viscosity Two-Phase Flows in Horizontal Pipes
Previous Article in Journal
An Improved Cleaning Protocol for Foraminiferal Calcite from Unconsolidated Core Sediments: HyPerCal—A New Practice for Micropaleontological and Paleoclimatic Proxies
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Nonlinear Destructive Interaction between Wind and Wave Loads Acting on the Substructure of the Offshore Wind Energy Converter: A Numerical Study

J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8(12), 999; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8120999
by Yong Jun Cho
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8(12), 999; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8120999
Submission received: 11 November 2020 / Revised: 3 December 2020 / Accepted: 4 December 2020 / Published: 7 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Coastal Engineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Just a few observations:

Line 173 – aerodynamic damping relation with Uair not with Uair2

Measurement units in figures: Hz not HZ, N not Newton

Figure 19, c – m2/s  not m2/as

Figure 21 is missing

Author Response

Thank you for your comments and suggestions.

The manuscript is revised as requested by reviewer.

The Change highlighted using the blue color can be summarized such as the following:

 

  1. Line 173 – aerodynamic damping relation with Uair not with Uair2

As requested by reviewer, the manuscript is revised such as the following:

 

Therefore, the aerodynamic damping  is additionally introduced.

    2.Measurement units in figures: Hz not HZ, N not Newton

As requested by reviewer, the Figure 19 is modified such as the following:

Figure 20. Trajectories of the drag force and inertia force that comprise the wave force

3.Figure 19, c – m2/s not m2/as

As requested by reviewer, the Figure 19 is modified such as the following:

  1. Figure 21 is missing

As requested by reviewer, the Figure 21 is added:

Figure 21. Trajectories of the wave force and wind force.

 

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors, please find here some minor comments.

 

Align the equation numbers to the right

L33: Power generation via offshore wind energy is expected to grow to 75 GW by 2020--> add a reference

L42: high-quality wind -> explain better 

L67: large eddies that swirl clockwise: should the rotation direction depend upon the latitude?

L197: sigmaU not defined

L412: do not use italic for the unit of measures if not done elsewhere in the manuscript

Author Response

Thank you for your comments and suggestions.

The manuscript is revised as requested by reviewer.

The Change highlighted using the blue color can be summarized such as the following:

 

  1. Align the equation numbers to the right

To my understanding, after accepted, the manuscript will be edited by the editorial staff.

  1. L33: Power generation via offshore wind energy is expected to grow to 75 GW by 2020--> add a reference

As requested by reviewer, the manuscript is revised such as the following:

1.Introduction

Power generation via offshore wind energy is expected to grow to 75 GW by 2020 [1,2]. Thus, the growth potential for the offshore wind industry is immense. However, the offshore wind industry is still suffering from problems, such as the large initial capital requirements. Most initial capital expenditures occur during the process of assembly and mounting, and the remaining costs are incurred by the actual sub-structure and maintenance

  1. L42: high-quality wind -> explain better 

As requested by reviewer, the manuscript is revised such as the following:

 

in deep waters where the wind velocity fast enough for power generation is sustained longer,

 

  1. L67: large eddies that swirl clockwise: should the rotation direction depend upon the latitude?

To the best of my knowledge, large eddies that swirl clockwise does not depend on the latitude.

  1. L197: sigmaU not defined

As requested by reviewer, the manuscript is revised such as the following:

and the turbulence intensity  is defined as the standard deviation of the wind velocity  around its mean value

  1. L412: do not use italic for the unit of measures if not done elsewhere in the manuscript

As requested by reviewer, the unit of measures in the whole manuscript is revised  in italic.

Back to TopTop