Peer-Review Record
Human Sovereignty and the Logical Problem of Evil
Religions 2022, 13(8), 766; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13080766
Reviewer 1:
Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Anonymous
Religions 2022, 13(8), 766; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13080766
Submission received: 21 July 2022
/
Revised: 18 August 2022
/
Accepted: 19 August 2022
/
Published: 22 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Do We Now Have a Logical Argument from Evil?)
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The thesis is original and interesting; and the argument is clear and compelling.
I have only minor comments to do with (what I suspect are) typos.
On p. 4, at line 167: "...and that that which is is all around us." (I don't even have a guess as to what this means.)
On p. 7, at line 323: I believe the author means "...once again..." (not 'one again').
On p. 10, at line 446: I think the author means to say "...possible objections..." (plural).
Author Response
Thanks, all typos fixed.
Reviewer 2 Report
This paper responds to the arguments of Sterba (2019, 2020, 2021) against theism based on the logical problem of evil. It is original and borrows the relevance of the articles by Sterba. As a response to a single author, it does not add much to the field, but it does answer a prominent voice. Methodologically the paper is a straightforward analysis with no issues to address. The conclusions drawn are well supported and directly on point. References are appropriate if somewhat parochial, though this is understandable given the limited scope of the paper.
Author Response
Thanks for the helpful feedback
