Overcoming the Imperialist Seduction: A Polylogue Reading of Mary towards a Theology of Peace
Victor Shnirelman
Irena Pavlovic
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Please see the attachment.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Author claims to write from a Christian perspective. Here, however, a Roman Catholic position is clearly represented ans dominate.
For example the distinction between Roman Catholic and Christian Orthodox understanding of Mariology was not mentioned.
Viewing Russian aggression as an imperial project is a Western interpretation of war. There are also another interpretationens/narratieves, like dekolonial interpretation.
The exact explication of political theology is missing. Political theologies are a very disparate field.
Empires from the past, such as Byzantium, are not to be equated with present states.
Very creative approach to impelemte islam view on use/missuse of Ikons of Mary!
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
The author clarified several important points, and now it looks better. But with respect to local names and expressions I would recommend to follow native speakers. Russian Viktor Zolotov would never be Wiktor Solodow. And there is the Ukrainian expression "Mista nema a more zostalos'" ("a more" means "but sea". There are two words). "Ammore" is non sense.
