Next Article in Journal
Negotiating the Affordance of Greco-Roman Spiritual Exercise for Community Flourishing: From and beyond Foucauldian Care of the Self
Next Article in Special Issue
Mosaic of Meaning: A Redemptive Reading of Genesis 3:16 in Light of Its Biblical Contexts and Inter-Texts
Previous Article in Journal
Public Theology as a Theology of Resilience in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Public Pastoral Care Contribution
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reverse the Curse: Genesis, Defamiliarization, and the Song of Songs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Unbinding Genesis 3:16: A Theocentric Critique of Sex-Based Power

Theological Seminary, Department of Theology and Christian Philosophy, Andrews University, Berrien Springs, MI 49103, USA
Religions 2024, 15(10), 1214; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15101214
Submission received: 27 June 2024 / Revised: 26 September 2024 / Accepted: 27 September 2024 / Published: 7 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Eve’s Curse: Redemptive Readings of Genesis 3:16)

Abstract

The judgment of Eve in Genesis 3:16 has traditionally been construed as an etiological curse on the relationship dynamics between genders, garnering scholarly scrutiny on the terms for desire and rule. Many exegetes regard this verse as the biblical rationale for patriarchal cultures throughout history. Despite attempts to ameliorate the notion of husbandly rule to protectorship, guidance, and loving servant-leadership, the power asymmetry between genders hinges on the interpretation of a simple Hebrew preposition be, commonly translated as “over” at the end of Genesis 3:16 as “he shall rule over you”. This article re-examines the semantics of the linguistic pairing of the particular ruling verb māšal followed by the preposition be through three verses in close proximity: Genesis 1:18, Genesis 3:16, and Genesis 4:7. Given the contextual sensitivity inherent in flexible prepositions, a theocentric reinterpretation of the surrounding narrative opens the possibility for a new redemptive reading by rendering the preposition as “with,” a meaning well within its semantic spectrum. In that case, to a woman hurt by betrayals from the animal, botanical, and human realms of her new existence, God promises help in healing her damaged marriage by intensifying her emotional desire for her husband, then chiding Eve to include him in her future decisions: “and he must rule with you”.
Keywords: Eve’s curse; Genesis 3:16; biblical exegesis; hermeneutics; the Fall; Adam and Eve; teshuqah; Cain and Abel; judgment; Genesis 4:7 Eve’s curse; Genesis 3:16; biblical exegesis; hermeneutics; the Fall; Adam and Eve; teshuqah; Cain and Abel; judgment; Genesis 4:7

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Drew, A.S. Unbinding Genesis 3:16: A Theocentric Critique of Sex-Based Power. Religions 2024, 15, 1214. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15101214

AMA Style

Drew AS. Unbinding Genesis 3:16: A Theocentric Critique of Sex-Based Power. Religions. 2024; 15(10):1214. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15101214

Chicago/Turabian Style

Drew, Arlyn S. 2024. "Unbinding Genesis 3:16: A Theocentric Critique of Sex-Based Power" Religions 15, no. 10: 1214. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15101214

APA Style

Drew, A. S. (2024). Unbinding Genesis 3:16: A Theocentric Critique of Sex-Based Power. Religions, 15(10), 1214. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15101214

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop