Next Article in Journal
Design of Distributed Discrete-Event Simulation Systems Using Deep Belief Networks
Previous Article in Journal
Technological Aspects of Blockchain Application for Vehicle-to-Network
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Systematic Review of the Application of Maturity Models in Universities

by
Esteban Tocto-Cano
1,2,
Sandro Paz Collado
1,
Javier Linkolk López-Gonzales
2,* and
Josué E. Turpo-Chaparro
3
1
Doctorado en Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima 32, Peru
2
Facultad de Ingeniería y Arquitectura, Universidad Peruana Unión, Lima 15, Peru
3
Escuela de Posgrado, Universidad Peruana Unión, Lima 15, Peru
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Information 2020, 11(10), 466; https://doi.org/10.3390/info11100466
Submission received: 22 August 2020 / Revised: 24 September 2020 / Accepted: 27 September 2020 / Published: 1 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Information Applications)

Abstract

A maturity model is a widely used tool in software engineering and has mostly been extended to domains such as education, health, energy, finance, government, and general use. It is valuable for evaluations and continuous improvement of business processes or certain aspects of organizations, as it represents a more organized and systematic way of doing business. In this paper, we only focus on college higher education. For this reason, we present a novel approach that allows detecting some gaps in the existing maturity models for universities, as they are not models that address the dimensions in their entirety. To identify these models and their validities, as well as a classification of models that were identified in universities, we carried out a systematic literature review on 27,289 articles retrieved with respect to maturity models and published in peer-reviewed journals between 2007 and 2020. We found 23 articles that find maturity models applied in universities, through exclusion and inclusion criteria. We then grouped these items into nine categories with specific purposes. We concluded that maturity models used in Universities move towards agility, which is supported by the semantic web.
Keywords: maturity model; universities; CMMI; evaluation; continuous improvement maturity model; universities; CMMI; evaluation; continuous improvement

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tocto-Cano, E.; Paz Collado, S.; López-Gonzales, J.L.; Turpo-Chaparro, J.E. A Systematic Review of the Application of Maturity Models in Universities. Information 2020, 11, 466. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11100466

AMA Style

Tocto-Cano E, Paz Collado S, López-Gonzales JL, Turpo-Chaparro JE. A Systematic Review of the Application of Maturity Models in Universities. Information. 2020; 11(10):466. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11100466

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tocto-Cano, Esteban, Sandro Paz Collado, Javier Linkolk López-Gonzales, and Josué E. Turpo-Chaparro. 2020. "A Systematic Review of the Application of Maturity Models in Universities" Information 11, no. 10: 466. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11100466

APA Style

Tocto-Cano, E., Paz Collado, S., López-Gonzales, J. L., & Turpo-Chaparro, J. E. (2020). A Systematic Review of the Application of Maturity Models in Universities. Information, 11(10), 466. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11100466

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop