Author Contributions
Conceptualization, J.D., M.-Y.C. and Y.-F.W.; Data curation, J.D. and M.-Y.C.; Formal analysis, J.D. and M.-Y.C.; Methodology, J.D. and Y.-F.W.; Software, J.D. and M.-Y.C.; Supervision, M.-Y.C.; Writing—original draft, J.D. and Y.-F.W.; Writing—review and editing, J.D. and Y.-F.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Science Council, Taiwan (MOST 107-2627-H-003 -001-MY5).
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Liang-Yu Hsu for the data collection.
Conflicts of Interest
No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and the manuscript is approved by all authors for publication.
References
- Ozdemir, A.; Tozlu, E.; Şen, E.; Ateşoğlu, H. Analyses of word-of-mouth communication and its effect on students’ university preferences. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016, 235, 22–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wakefiled, L.T.; Bennet, G. Sports fan experience: Electronic word-of-mouth in ephemeral social media. Sport Manag. Rev. 2018, 21, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popp, B.; Woratschek, H. Introducing branded communities in sport for building strong brand relations in social media. Sport Manag. Rev. 2016, 19, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yoshida, M.; James, J. Customer satisfaction with game and service experience: Antecedents and consequences. J. Sport Manag. 2010, 24, 338–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whiteside, K. If London was Twitter Olympics, Call Sochi the Viral Games. USA Today. 2014. Available online: http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/olympics/sochi/2014/02/10/sochi-russia-social-media-winter-olympic-games/5381185/ (accessed on 4 April 2014).
- Anastasiei, B.; Dospinescu, N. A model of the relationship between the Big Five personality traits and the motivations to deliver word-of-mouth online. Psihologija 2018, 51, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Piwek, L.; Joinson, A. What do they snapchat about? Patterns of use in time-limited instant messaging service. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 54, 358–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Constine, J. Snapchat Reportedly Hit 160 M Daily Users and $400 M Revenue in 2016. Available online: https://techcrunch.com/2017/02/02/snap-ipo/ (accessed on 17 March 2017).
- Anastasiei, B.; Dospinescu, N. Facebook advertising: Relationship between types of message, brand attitude and preceived buying risk. Ann. Constant Brâncuşi Univ. Târgu Jiu Econ. Ser. 2017, 6, 18–26. [Google Scholar]
- Du, J.; Chen, M.-Y.; Wu, Y.-F. Consumers’ Purchasing Intention and Exploratory Buying Behavior Tendency for Wearable Technology: The Moderating Role of Sport Involvement. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM), Shanghai, China, 25–27 September 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Katz, E.; Lazarsfeld, P.F. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communication; Free Press: Glencoe, IL, USA, 1955. [Google Scholar]
- Alexandris, K.; Dimitriadis, N.; Kasiara, A. The behavioural consequences of perceived service quality: An exploratory study in the context of private fitness clubs in Greece. Eur. Sport Manag. Q. 2001, 1, 280–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anastasiei, B.; Dospinescu, N. Electronic word-of-mouth for online retailers: Predictors of volume and valence. Sustainability 2019, 11, 814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Taylor, D.G.; Lewin, J.E.; Strutton, D. Friends, fans, and followers: Do ads work on social networks? J. Advert. Res. 2011, 51, 258–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoo, J.J.; Arnold, T.J.; Frankwuck, G.L. Effects of positive customer-to-customer service interaction. J. Bus. Res. 2012, 65, 1313–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Decrop, A.; Derbaix, C. Pride in contemporary sport consumption: A marketing perspective. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2010, 38, 586–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.H.; Kee, Y.H.; Chen, M.-Y. Why grateful adolescent athletes are more satisfied with their life: The mediating role of perceived team cohesion. Social Indic. Res. 2015, 124, 463–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, K.C.; Kek, S.W. Service quality in higher education using an enhanced SERVQUAL approach. Qual. Higher Educ. 2004, 10, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeithaml, V.A.; Bitner, M.J.; Gremler, D.D. Service Marketing: Integrating Customer Focus across the Firm, 4th ed.; McGraw-Hill/Irwin: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Lock, D.; Funk, D.C.; Doyle, J.P.; McDonald, H. Examining the longitudinal structure, stability, and dimensional interrelationships of team identification. J. Sport Manag. 2016, 28, 119–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biscaia, R.; Correia, A.; Rosado, A.; Maroco, J.; Ross, S. The effects of emotions on football spectators’ satisfaction and behavioral intentions. Eur. Sport Manag. Q. 2012, 12, 227–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bodet, G.; Bernache-Assollant, I. Consumer loyalty in sport spectatorship services: The relationships with consumer satisfaction and team identification. Psychol. Mark. 2011, 28, 781–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.C.; Yen, D.C.; Hwang, M.I. Factors influencing the continuance intention to the usage of Web 2.0: An empirical study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2012, 28, 933–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L.; Black, W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed.; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Arnold, W.E.; McCroskey, J.C.; Prichard, S.V.O. The Likert-type scale. Today’s Speech 1967, 15, 31–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casaló, L.V.; Flavian, C.; Guinaliu, M. The role of satisfaction and website usability in developing customer loyalty and positive word-of-mouth in the e-banking services. Int. J. Bank Mark. 2008, 26, 399–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajaguru, R.; Hassanli, N. The role of trip purpose and hotel star rating on guests’ satisfaction and WOM. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 30, 2268–2286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
Table 1.
Descriptive statistics of respondent background variables.
Factors | Sampling Results | N | % |
---|
Gender | Male | 242 | 42.3 |
female | 329 | 57.5 |
The level of understanding of the Universiade | high | 111 | 19.4 |
medium | 299 | 52.4 |
low | 161 | 28.2 |
Frequency of use of social media | several times a day | 475 | 83.0 |
once a day | 82 | 14.3 |
once or twice a week | 10 | 1.7 |
several intervals over 7 days in a month | 2 | 0.3 |
less than once a month | 3 | 0.5 |
Media use duration | one hour or less | 245 | 42.8 |
two–four hours | 263 | 46.0 |
five–seven hours | 42 | 7.3 |
eight hours or more | 22 | 3.8 |
Table 2.
t test for word of mouth (WOM) communication by gender.
| Gender | N | M | SD | t | p | d |
---|
WOM communication | male | 242 | 2.92 | 0.81 | 1.52 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
female | 329 | 2.82 | 0.77 | | | |
WOM search | male | 242 | 3.06 | 0.92 | 0.33 | 0.74 | 0.03 |
female | 329 | 3.03 | 0.88 | | | |
WOM dissemination | male | 242 | 2.77 | 0.86 | 2.47 * | 0.01 * | 0.21 |
female | 329 | 2.60 | 0.82 | | | |
Table 3.
t test for satisfaction by gender.
| Gender | N | M | SD | t | p | d |
---|
Overall satisfaction | male | 242 | 4.22 | 1.06 | 1.80 | 0.07 | 0.15 |
female | 329 | 4.05 | 1.10 | | | |
Service satisfaction | male | 242 | 4.15 | 1.17 | 1.57 | 1.57 | 0.13 |
female | 329 | 3.99 | 1.18 | | | |
Site satisfaction | male | 242 | 4.28 | 1.15 | 1.78 | 0.07 | 0.14 |
female | 329 | 4.11 | 1.16 | | | |
Table 4.
Variance analysis of different levels of understanding in WOM.
Source | SS | df | MS | F | Post hoc |
---|
WOM search | Between Groups | 40.35 | 2 | 20.17 | 26.92 * | A > B > C |
Within Groups | 425.55 | 568 | 0.74 | | |
Total | 465.90 | 570 | | | |
WOM dissemination | Between Groups | 40.31 | 2 | 20.15 | 31.07 * | A > B > C |
Within Groups | 368.47 | 568 | 0.64 | | |
Total | 408.78 | 570 | | | |
Table 5.
Variance analysis of different levels of understanding in overall satisfaction.
| Source | SS | df | MS | F | Post hoc |
---|
service satisfaction | Between Groups | 97.45 | 2 | 48.73 | 39.04 * | A > B > C |
Within Groups | 708.91 | 568 | 1.24 | | |
Total | 806.37 | 570 | | | |
site satisfaction | Between Groups | 110.75 | 2 | 55.38 | 47.19 * | A > B > C |
Within Groups | 666.53 | 568 | 1.17 | | |
Total | 777.29 | 570 | | | |
Table 6.
Variance analysis of the level of events understanding and the media duration on WOM.
Source | SS | df | MS | F | p | ηp2 |
---|
Level of understanding of the event | 22.20 | 2 | 11.10 | 20.11 *** | 0.00 | 0.06 |
B media duration | 40.31 | 2 | 0.98 | 1.78 | 0.16 | 0.00 |
A × B | 3.10 | 4 | 0.77 | 1.40 | 0.23 | 0.01 |
Error | 310.29 | 562 | 0.55 | | | |
Total | 354.99 | 570 | | | | |
Table 7.
Variance analysis of the level of understanding of events and the media duration on overall satisfaction.
Source | SS | df | MS | F | p | ηp2 |
---|
(A) Level of understanding of the event | 64.24 | 2 | 32.12 | 31.08 *** | 0.00 | 0.10 |
(B) media use duration | 1.12 | 2 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.00 |
A × B | 1.19 | 4 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.88 | 0.00 |
Error | 580.68 | 562 | 1.03 | | | |
Total | 686.63 | 570 | | | | |
Table 8.
Descriptive statistics, reliabilities and correlations of the variables.
Variables | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
---|
1. WOM search | 3.05 | 0.90 | - | | | | |
2.WOM dissemination | 2.67 | 0.84 | 0.62 ** | - | | | |
3. Service satisfaction | 4.06 | 1.18 | 0.43 ** | 0.58 ** | - | | |
4. Site satisfaction | 4.18 | 1.16 | 0.42 ** | 0.54 ** | 0.73 ** | - | |
5. WOM communication | 2.86 | 0.78 | 0.90 ** | 0.89 ** | 0.56 ** | 0.53 ** | - |
6. Overall satisfaction | 4.12 | 1.09 | 0.46 ** | 0.61 ** | 0.93 ** | 0.93 ** | 0.59 ** |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).