3. Principle and Design Method
Figure 2 illustrates the impact of the transistor sizing on the reflection coefficient
. The proposed design (Case C) achieves a lower
compared to Cases A and B across various W/L ratios, indicating better impedance matching. This improvement is attributed to the optimized matching network, which effectively reduces the input impedance variations and enhances the power transfer efficiency. In the RF rectifier design, achieving a lower
is crucial for minimizing the power losses due to reflection, thereby improving the overall power conversion efficiency (PCE). Compared to traditional inductor-less designs, our modified matching approach provides a more stable impedance profile, leading to superior performance under varying input conditions.
Figure 3 provides the relationship between transistor width and PCE for different rectifier topologies. The new design always offers a higher PCE for every
ratio, with the best point where efficiency is the highest. This is due to the influence of the
ratio on the transistor transconductance (
), which influences the conduction losses as well as the switching behavior. An increase in the
ratio increases gm, decreasing Ron and enhancing the current conduction. However, at a certain stage, the oversized transistor contributes to higher parasitic capacitances, degrading high-frequency operation. The compromise proves the imperative of prudent transistor sizing in designing an RF rectifier. The outcome is in accordance with the previous literature on CMOS rectifiers that states that a tradeoff between the efficiency of conduction and parasitic loss is accountable for providing a high PCE.
In the proposed schematic shown in
Figure 1c, transistors M1 and M2 are utilized for impedance matching, supporting the main rectifier structure formed by transistors M3 and M4 in a Dickson (voltage doubler) configuration, which serves the purpose of raising the voltage at the rectifier output. This setup is particularly beneficial in RF energy harvesting and wireless power transfer applications, as it allows the circuit to deliver a higher DC output voltage from the input RF signal. The operation of the voltage doubler relies on the alternative charging and discharging cycle of the transistors, where M3 is in conduction in the positive half-cycle to store charge, and M4 is in conduction in the negative half-cycle to transfer the stored charge to the output.
Figure 4 also examines the impact of transistor sizing on the PCE by taking a close-up of M3 and M4, the core of the voltage doubler. The novel design (Case C) outperforms Cases A and B, demonstrating the efficacy of the body-biasing technique at improving the conduction efficiency. The body-biasing technique reduces the threshold voltage (
) of the transistors, reducing the power loss during rectification. As a result, the suggested rectifier achieves better efficiency for a wide variety of
ratios. The trend here is consistent with the prior research on body-biasing for RF rectifiers, in which threshold voltage adjustment plays a significant role in PCE optimization.
This improvement is attributed to the effect of the ratio on the transistors’ transconductance (). As the ratio increases, the on-resistance () in the saturation region, which is inversely proportional to (), decreases. A higher value leads to a lower , enhancing the overall efficiency of the proposed design.
Figure 5 illustrates the PCE as a function of the input power at various load resistances. The new design continues to maintain the PCE above 50% over a broad range of input power with better performance compared to Cases A and B. At low input power, Case A exhibits competitive efficiency with reduced structural complexity. However, as the input power level rises, the advantage of the improved matching network and body-biasing technique in Case C is even clearer and allows it to be very efficient even under 20 dBm input power. This is a critical advantage for high-power RF energy harvesting systems, where rectifiers need to operate efficiently under various input levels. Compared with other CMOS rectifier circuits, our proposed solution has an improved figure of merit (FoM) through a broader range of efficient operation and smaller chip area.
To further evaluate the robustness of the proposed design, we analyzed the impact of temperature and process variations on PCE.
Figure 6 indicates that PCE decreases with an increase in temperature, demonstrating the degradation in performance due to increased thermal effects. The impact is worse at higher input power levels (20 dBm) compared to 15 dBm, where the efficiency drops consistently across the −40 °C to 120 °C temperature range. The simulation also considers the impact of different process corners, i.e., typical/typical, fast/fast, slow/slow, fast/slow, and slow/fast variations. The PCE is maximum for the fast/fast process, while the minimum efficiency is obtained for the slow/slow process, demonstrating the significance of manufacturing variations on the performance of the rectifier. Furthermore, at low input powers, PCE is more susceptible to process variation, which means design consideration must be careful in order to realize stable efficiency over different environmental and fabrication conditions.
5. Discussion
The optimized matching network and dynamic body-biasing based new pMOS-based rectifier shows high improvements in power conversion efficiency (PCE) for wideband radio-frequency (RF) energy harvesting and wireless power transfer systems. The body-biasing improves the conduction efficiency of the transistor by reducing the threshold voltage, which causes reduced power loss and a larger operating frequency range. Unlike conventional rectifiers that depend on precise impedance matching to optimize their performance, this topology exhibits robustness under input mismatched conditions, making it highly suitable for beam-forming wireless power transfer (WPT) systems.
One of the strong advantages of the proposed method is that it maintains a high PCE even in mismatched conditions of input. Traditional rectifiers, whose performance depends on narrowband impedance-matching circuits, suffer losses when input conditions deviate from their optimum design values. Utilizing a custom-tailored matching network, our rectifier ensures stable PCE across an extensive frequency bandwidth with minimal loss through reflection. The results indicate that the proposed design achieves the highest PCE of 60.5% at 0.7 GHz and has over 50% efficiency up to 2.5 GHz, which is better than conventional impedance-matching-based designs. This property is particularly desirable in dynamic RF environments where frequency variations are common.
The impact of transistor on-resistance () on the PCE is also critical. The value of controls the impedance matching condition, and at frequencies where is close to 50 Ω, the rectifier achieves better matching and higher efficiency. Conversely, at frequencies where deviates significantly from 50 Ω, the matching degrades, leading to a drop in the PCE. The proposed design effectively minimizes through body-biasing and optimized transistor width-to-length () ratios, ensuring improved efficiency across a broader frequency range. Compared to conventional rectifiers that rely on fixed impedance-matching networks, this approach provides greater adaptability and robustness.
While the proposed matching technique enhances wideband performance, there are sacrifices in terms of conventional impedance-matching techniques. Conventional matching networks are optimum for narrowband rectifiers, with improved peak PCE at a given frequency but reduced efficiency when frequency drifts occur. The proposed method, however, sacrifices minor peak PCE for broader frequency operation. This makes it ideal for use in applications that require uniform performance across varying input conditions but less than ideal for heavily optimized narrowband applications.
The other limitation is that while the design realizes high PCE at input power levels of between 15 dBm and 20 dBm, with very low power levels (<0 dBm) its performance can be undermined by the drop in threshold voltage across the CMOS transistors. Conventional diode-connected rectifiers can yield better efficiency in ultra-low-power operations. Similarly, at input power levels greater than 25 dBm, self-heating and reliability problems can undermine the operation of the rectifier.
Scalability to yet higher CMOS process nodes is yet another consideration. Advanced nodes have lower threshold voltages and better transistor mobility, which would make the PCE even more efficient. Experimental validation of the proposed rectifier via prototyping and experimentation is an important area of research for future investigation. While this study primarily focused on circuit-level optimization, we acknowledge that environmental factors such as reflection medium, distance, and multipath effects in wireless power transfer (WPT) scenarios can impact efficiency. Future experimental work will explore these system-level interactions to provide a more comprehensive validation of the proposed rectifier design. Additionally, future studies will investigate the influence of varying transmission distances and different reflection surfaces on received power levels, enabling a broader understanding of real-world deployment challenges.
In summary, the new rectifier offers high efficiency, wideband operation, and input mismatch insensitivity, and is therefore an extremely promising candidate for future RF energy harvesting and WPT applications. While conventional impedance-matching techniques can still be employed for optimal-case narrowband designs, this paper highlights the benefits of hybridizing body-biasing and compensated matching techniques for enhanced performance in different RF environments. Future work will involve experimental validation and extending the design to the higher power levels and frequencies.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, W.J.; methodology, W.J., A.B. and B.G.; software, W.J., A.B. and R.K.P.; writing—original draft preparation, W.J.; writing—review and editing, W.J., A.B. and R.K.P.; supervision, R.K.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
The study did not involve humans.
Data Availability Statement
The data are contained in the paper.
Acknowledgments
This research work was supported in part by the MIC/SCOPE Grant Number: JP215010003 and in part by the JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number: 22K14260. This work was also supported by the activities of VLSI Design and Education Center (VDEC), The University of Tokyo in collaboration with the Cadence Corporation, the Mentor Graphics Corporation, and Keysight Technologies Japan, Ltd.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
FoM | Figure of Merit |
IoT | Internet of Things |
PCE | Power Conversion Efficiency |
RF | Radio Frequency |
References
- Li, L.; Zhao, X.; Geng, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, L. Robust Beamforming Design for Swipt-Based Multi-Radiowireless Mesh Network with Cooperative Jamming. Information 2020, 11, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, W.; Zhan, M. Beamforming and Antenna Grouping Design for the Multi-Antenna Relay with Energy Harvesting to Improve Secrecy Rate. Information 2016, 7, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nariman, M.; Shirinfar, F.; Pamarti, S.; Rofougaran, M.; Rofougaran, R.; De Flaviis, F. A Compact Millimeter-Wave Energy Transmission System for Wireless Applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, Seattle, WA, USA, 2–4 June 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Hashimoto, T.; Tanzawa, T. Design Space Exploration of Antenna Impedance and On-Chip Rectifier for Microwave Wireless Power Transfer. Electronics 2022, 11, 3218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, P.; Huang, S.Y.; Zhou, W.; Ren, Z.H.; Liu, Z.; Huang, K.; Liu, C. High-Efficient Rectifier with Extended Input Power Range Based on Self-Tuning Impedance Matching. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2018, 28, 1116–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansour, M.M.; Torigoe, S.; Yamamoto, S.; Kanaya, H. Compact and Simple High-Efficient Dual-Band RF-DC Rectifier for Wireless Electromagnetic Energy Harvesting. Electronics 2021, 10, 1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fokin, G.; Volgushev, D. Model for Interference Evaluation in 5G Millimeter-Wave Ultra-Dense Network with Location-Aware Beamforming. Information 2023, 14, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamed, M.M.; Fahmy, G.A.; Abdel-Rahman, A.B.; Allam, A.; Barakat, A.; Abo-Zahhad, M.; Jia, H.; Pokharel, R.K. High-Efficiency CMOS RF-to-DC Rectifier Based on Dynamic Threshold Reduction Technique for Wireless Charging Applications. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 46826–46832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awad, M.; Benech, P.; Duchamp, J.M. Performance Comparison of RF Energy Harvesting Rectifiers Designed in CMOS FDSOI 28 Nm with Dynamic Back Gate Biasing and BiCMOS 55 Nm Technology. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2021, 63, 1411–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Absi, M.A.; Alkhalifa, I.M.; Mohammed, A.A.; Al-Khulaifi, A.A. A CMOS Rectifier Employing Body Biasing Scheme for RF Energy Harvesting. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 105606–105611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Godinho, A.; Yang, Z.; Dong, T.; Gonçalves, L.; Mendes, P.; Wen, Y.; Li, P.; Jiang, Z. A Dynamic Threshold Cancellation Technique for a High-Power Conversion Efficiency Cmos Rectifier. Sensors 2021, 21, 6883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jordan, W.; Barakat, A.; Gyawali, B.; Pokharel, R.K. High-Efficiency Wideband Inductor-Less Platinum-Band CMOS Rectifier. AEU—Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2025, 193, 155737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, R.; Qi, Y.; Lavasani, H.M. A Highly Efficient CMOS Rectifier for Ultra-Low-Power Ambient RF Energy Harvesting. In Proceedings of the Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Lansing, MI, USA, 9–11 August 2021; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 212–215. [Google Scholar]
- Jordan, W.; Barakat, A.; Gyawali, B.; Pokharel, R.K. High-Efficiency Platinum-Band CMOS Rectifier Using Modified Body-Biasing Technique. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Technol. Lett. 2024, 34, 1290–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abouzied, M.A.; Ravichandran, K.; Sanchez-Sinencio, E. A Fully Integrated Reconfigurable Self-Startup RF Energy-Harvesting System with Storage Capability. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2017, 52, 704–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsai, C.H.; Liao, I.N.; Pakasiri, C.; Pan, H.C.; Wang, Y.J. A Wideband 20 MW UHF Rectifier in CMOS. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2015, 25, 388–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, Z.; Shen, S.; Zhong, X.; Li, X.; Tsui, C.Y.; Bermak, A.; Murch, R.; Sanchez-Sinencio, E. Design of Sub-Gigahertz Reconfigurable RF Energy Harvester From-22 to 4 DBm with 99.8% Peak MPPT Power Efficiency. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2019, 54, 2601–2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Lu, Y.; Huang, M.; Martins, R.P. A 2.4-GHz Mid-Field CMOS Wireless Power Receiver Achieving 46% Maximum PCE and 163-MW Output Power. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs 2020, 67, 360–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gyawali, B.; Pokharel, R.K.; Thapa, S.K.; Barakat, A.; Shinohara, N. New Rectification Technique Employing Auxiliary Rectifier for Resonance Control Achieving Compact Size and High Efficiency in CMOS. IEEE Solid. State Circuits Lett. 2024, 7, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).