Next Article in Journal
Kubernetes-Powered Cardiovascular Monitoring: Enhancing Internet of Things Heart Rate Systems for Scalability and Efficiency
Next Article in Special Issue
Memristor-Based Neuromorphic System for Unsupervised Online Learning and Network Anomaly Detection on Edge Devices
Previous Article in Journal
Smart Car Damage Assessment Using Enhanced YOLO Algorithm and Image Processing Techniques
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhancing Real-Time Cursor Control with Motor Imagery and Deep Neural Networks for Brain–Computer Interfaces
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced RF Power Conversion for Sensor Networks and Embedded Sensors

Graduate School of Information Science and Electrical Engineering, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Information 2025, 16(3), 212; https://doi.org/10.3390/info16030212
Submission received: 31 January 2025 / Revised: 2 March 2025 / Accepted: 8 March 2025 / Published: 10 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intelligent Information Processing for Sensors and IoT Communications)

Abstract

:
Wireless power transfer using beamforming technology has recently gained significant attention for sensor networks and embedded systems. This technology uses array antennas and mid-range RF power (15–20 dBm) rectifiers for efficient power delivery to sensors. Despite its potential, research on mid-range RF power CMOS rectifiers remains limited. Addressing this gap, we propose a high-efficiency pMOS-based rectifier employing a body-biasing technique—a proven method for enhancing device performance—specifically designed for wideband and mid-range RF power RF applications. Conventional rectifiers often depend on precise input impedance matching to achieve high power conversion efficiency (PCE), which restricts bandwidth and limits practicality in dynamic environments. To overcome these challenges, the proposed design integrates a modified matching network, combined with dynamic body-biasing, which lowers the pMOS threshold voltage and minimizes power losses. Simulations reveal a peak PCE of 60.5%, with efficiency exceeding 50% across a broad frequency range up to 2.5 GHz—significantly outperforming traditional designs. Unlike conventional impedance-matching solutions, this rectifier maintains robust performance under input mismatches, making it well-suited for beamforming-based WPT systems. This study highlights the potential of integrating body-biasing with advanced matching networks for efficient wideband rectifiers.

1. Introduction

Wideband rectifiers are essential for high-frequency power applications, including wireless power transfer, the Internet of Things (IoT), and radio frequency (RF) energy harvesting [1,2,3]. For optimal performance, these rectifiers must achieve high power conversion efficiency (PCE) over a broad frequency range while managing significant input power ( P i n ). However, conventional rectifier designs often rely on precise impedance matching [4,5], which limits bandwidth and reduces efficiency in dynamic environments. This constraint makes them less suitable for emerging mid-range RF power and wideband applications.
In addition, dual-band rectifier topologies have also been of interest in the sense that they enable energy harvesting from multiple frequency bands with higher overall power conversion efficiency and compact circuit footprint [6]. Continuing with the enhancements, this paper introduces a new CMOS rectifier which incorporates a reconfigurable impedance matching network along with body-biasing techniques to enhance efficiency and widen the operating frequency range. While extensive research has focused on low-power CMOS rectifiers [7,8,9], the development of mid-range RF power CMOS rectifiers remains relatively unexplored.
Much research has focused on improving the efficiency of CMOS rectifiers for wireless power transfer (WPT) applications through the minimization of threshold voltage losses and impedance mismatch. Ref. [10] introduced a CMOS rectifier with an adaptive body-biasing method to dynamically reduce the transistor threshold voltage (Vth) when the PMOS is ON, thereby increasing the conduction current and power conversion efficiency (PCE). The device exhibited a peak PCE of 78.2% at −27.5 dBm input power, with improved efficiency at low powers. Its operation, however, degraded at high input powers due to leakage current through parasitic diodes, requiring additional mechanisms to inhibit reverse current flow.
The authors of [5] presented a self-tuning impedance matching (STIM) technique to combat impedance variations in rectifiers. Their rectifier, which was conceived at 2.4 GHz, reached more than 50% PCE over an extended input power interval of 2.5–25.5 dBm, surpassing conventional designs. The main drawback was increased circuit complexity and additional components, which could cause insertion losses in practice. Ref. [11] introduced a dynamic threshold cancellation (DTC) technique, integrating a negative voltage converter and an active rectifier to reduce threshold voltage losses and inhibit reverse leakage currents. Their CMOS rectifier, fabricated in a 130 nm process, achieved a great PCE of 90% at 0.45 V input voltage and is suitable for ultra-low-power applications. The design was optimized, however, for low-frequency operation (800 Hz–51.2 kHz), limiting its application to high-frequency RF energy harvesting.
These works emphasize the importance of body-biasing, adaptive impedance matching, and dynamic threshold cancellation for CMOS rectifier performance improvement. The existing solutions, however, continue to experience problems such as efficiency degradation at high powers, circuit complexity, and frequency limitations. To address this gap, this study proposes a high-efficiency pMOS-based rectifier utilizing a dynamic body-biasing technique to enhance conduction efficiency and minimize power losses. Unlike conventional impedance-matching approaches, the proposed design integrates a modified matching network that enables robust operation even under input mismatch conditions. Simulation results demonstrate a peak PCE of 60.5%, with efficiency exceeding 50% across a wide frequency range up to 2.5 GHz. These findings highlight the potential of body-biasing and advanced matching techniques for next-generation wideband rectifiers, particularly in beam-forming wireless power transfer systems.

2. Overview of the Proposed Method

This section explores the development of a modified matching and body-biasing CMOS rectifier utilizing pMOS transistors. Our earlier research focused on designing a wideband inductor-less nMOS native rectifier [12]. Even for the earlier research on an inductor-less nMOS native rectifier, the chip size active area was 0.44 mm2, which is still considered large because of the inductor’s replacement with a capacitor. In CMOS technology, pMOS transistors are commonly used to emulate diode behavior, and their performance can be enhanced by supplying voltage to the body terminal. Traditionally, this voltage is supplied via the output terminal [13], which serves as the highest voltage node. In our other work [14], the body terminal of each pMOS transistor was connected to its respective drain terminal. The problem with [14] is that the inductance value needed is too large and will consume a huge proportion of the chip active area. All of the above works in CMOS technology suffers from bandwidth limitations, despite the increasing bandwidth demands of rectifiers in beamforming-based WPT systems.
To address this bandwidth issue, this study examines the impact of using an inductor as a transmission line to implement a modified matching technique, combined with the body-biasing approach [14], to design a wideband rectifier. This study has a considerable chip size, where even with using one inductor, this study’s chip active area is 0.48 mm2 that is almost in similar size to the previous inductor-less work [12]. In addition, this study also managed to reduce the size of the inductor to 26% of the inductance value needed in [14] and to achieve the higher FoM of 198.587 with the 2.3 GHz range of wideband with a more than 50% PCE, which is wider and better. For comparison, three configurations are analyzed: the inductor-less nMOS native rectifier from the prior work (Case A), the pMOS rectifier with body-biasing via the output voltage (Case B), and the proposed design (Case C). These configurations are depicted in Figure 1a–c, while Figure 1d compares their power conversion efficiency (PCE). The results indicate that the proposed design reaches a peak PCE of 60.5% at 0.7 GHz and sustains over 50% efficiency up to 2.5 GHz.

3. Principle and Design Method

Figure 2 illustrates the impact of the transistor sizing on the reflection coefficient S 11 . The proposed design (Case C) achieves a lower S 11 compared to Cases A and B across various W/L ratios, indicating better impedance matching. This improvement is attributed to the optimized matching network, which effectively reduces the input impedance variations and enhances the power transfer efficiency. In the RF rectifier design, achieving a lower S 11 is crucial for minimizing the power losses due to reflection, thereby improving the overall power conversion efficiency (PCE). Compared to traditional inductor-less designs, our modified matching approach provides a more stable impedance profile, leading to superior performance under varying input conditions. Figure 3 provides the relationship between transistor width and PCE for different rectifier topologies. The new design always offers a higher PCE for every W L ratio, with the best point where efficiency is the highest. This is due to the influence of the W L ratio on the transistor transconductance ( g m ), which influences the conduction losses as well as the switching behavior. An increase in the W L ratio increases gm, decreasing Ron and enhancing the current conduction. However, at a certain stage, the oversized transistor contributes to higher parasitic capacitances, degrading high-frequency operation. The compromise proves the imperative of prudent transistor sizing in designing an RF rectifier. The outcome is in accordance with the previous literature on CMOS rectifiers that states that a tradeoff between the efficiency of conduction and parasitic loss is accountable for providing a high PCE.
In the proposed schematic shown in Figure 1c, transistors M1 and M2 are utilized for impedance matching, supporting the main rectifier structure formed by transistors M3 and M4 in a Dickson (voltage doubler) configuration, which serves the purpose of raising the voltage at the rectifier output. This setup is particularly beneficial in RF energy harvesting and wireless power transfer applications, as it allows the circuit to deliver a higher DC output voltage from the input RF signal. The operation of the voltage doubler relies on the alternative charging and discharging cycle of the transistors, where M3 is in conduction in the positive half-cycle to store charge, and M4 is in conduction in the negative half-cycle to transfer the stored charge to the output. Figure 4 also examines the impact of transistor sizing on the PCE by taking a close-up of M3 and M4, the core of the voltage doubler. The novel design (Case C) outperforms Cases A and B, demonstrating the efficacy of the body-biasing technique at improving the conduction efficiency. The body-biasing technique reduces the threshold voltage ( V t h ) of the transistors, reducing the power loss during rectification. As a result, the suggested rectifier achieves better efficiency for a wide variety of W L ratios. The trend here is consistent with the prior research on body-biasing for RF rectifiers, in which threshold voltage adjustment plays a significant role in PCE optimization.
This improvement is attributed to the effect of the W L ratio on the transistors’ transconductance ( g m ). As the W L ratio increases, the on-resistance ( R o n ) in the saturation region, which is inversely proportional to g m ( R o n = 1 g m ), decreases. A higher g m value leads to a lower R o n , enhancing the overall efficiency of the proposed design.
Figure 5 illustrates the PCE as a function of the input power at various load resistances. The new design continues to maintain the PCE above 50% over a broad range of input power with better performance compared to Cases A and B. At low input power, Case A exhibits competitive efficiency with reduced structural complexity. However, as the input power level rises, the advantage of the improved matching network and body-biasing technique in Case C is even clearer and allows it to be very efficient even under 20 dBm input power. This is a critical advantage for high-power RF energy harvesting systems, where rectifiers need to operate efficiently under various input levels. Compared with other CMOS rectifier circuits, our proposed solution has an improved figure of merit (FoM) through a broader range of efficient operation and smaller chip area.
To further evaluate the robustness of the proposed design, we analyzed the impact of temperature and process variations on PCE. Figure 6 indicates that PCE decreases with an increase in temperature, demonstrating the degradation in performance due to increased thermal effects. The impact is worse at higher input power levels (20 dBm) compared to 15 dBm, where the efficiency drops consistently across the −40 °C to 120 °C temperature range. The simulation also considers the impact of different process corners, i.e., typical/typical, fast/fast, slow/slow, fast/slow, and slow/fast variations. The PCE is maximum for the fast/fast process, while the minimum efficiency is obtained for the slow/slow process, demonstrating the significance of manufacturing variations on the performance of the rectifier. Furthermore, at low input powers, PCE is more susceptible to process variation, which means design consideration must be careful in order to realize stable efficiency over different environmental and fabrication conditions.

4. Implementation and Simulation

The proposed rectifier layout was implemented using 180 nm CMOS technology (PDK is by TSMC, Taiwan), occupying an active area of 0.6 mm × 0.8 mm, as illustrated in Figure 7a. Post-layout simulation of the S 11 parameter was also performed, with the results shown in Figure 7b. The rectifier exhibited excellent S 11 performance, maintaining values below −8 dB across the frequency range of 0.1 to 2.5 GHz for input power levels of 16, 18, and 20 dBm under optimal load resistance conditions.
To evaluate its performance, simulations were carried out with three different load resistances. Figure 8a shows the post-layout simulation power conversion efficiencies (PCE) versus input power for varying load resistances. The highest PCE, exceeding 50%, was achieved at 700 MHz for an input power range of 16–20 dBm with an optimal load resistance of 1.15 KΩ, reaching its peak at 20 dBm. Figure 8b illustrates the post-layout simulation PCE versus frequency with the optimal load resistance, with a maximum PCE of 60.5% observed at 0.7 GHz for an input power of 20 dBm. Having already fabricated and implemented two CMOS rectifier designs ([12,14]), and since this design also adheres to the same design rules (DRC, LVS, and parasitic extraction), the expected deviation between the presented results and measured values should be within 5%.
Table 1 presents a performance comparison between the proposed rectifier and other designs, highlighting its ability to maintain a PCE of over 50% across a wide frequency range from 0.2 GHz to 2.5 GHz. With a peak PCE of 60.5% achieved at 0.7 GHz and 20 dBm input power, the proposed rectifier surpasses the performance of other designs in handling input power effectively.

5. Discussion

The optimized matching network and dynamic body-biasing based new pMOS-based rectifier shows high improvements in power conversion efficiency (PCE) for wideband radio-frequency (RF) energy harvesting and wireless power transfer systems. The body-biasing improves the conduction efficiency of the transistor by reducing the threshold voltage, which causes reduced power loss and a larger operating frequency range. Unlike conventional rectifiers that depend on precise impedance matching to optimize their performance, this topology exhibits robustness under input mismatched conditions, making it highly suitable for beam-forming wireless power transfer (WPT) systems.
One of the strong advantages of the proposed method is that it maintains a high PCE even in mismatched conditions of input. Traditional rectifiers, whose performance depends on narrowband impedance-matching circuits, suffer losses when input conditions deviate from their optimum design values. Utilizing a custom-tailored matching network, our rectifier ensures stable PCE across an extensive frequency bandwidth with minimal loss through reflection. The results indicate that the proposed design achieves the highest PCE of 60.5% at 0.7 GHz and has over 50% efficiency up to 2.5 GHz, which is better than conventional impedance-matching-based designs. This property is particularly desirable in dynamic RF environments where frequency variations are common.
The impact of transistor on-resistance ( R o n ) on the PCE is also critical. The value of R o n controls the impedance matching condition, and at frequencies where R o n is close to 50 Ω, the rectifier achieves better matching and higher efficiency. Conversely, at frequencies where R o n deviates significantly from 50 Ω, the matching degrades, leading to a drop in the PCE. The proposed design effectively minimizes R o n through body-biasing and optimized transistor width-to-length ( W L ) ratios, ensuring improved efficiency across a broader frequency range. Compared to conventional rectifiers that rely on fixed impedance-matching networks, this approach provides greater adaptability and robustness.
While the proposed matching technique enhances wideband performance, there are sacrifices in terms of conventional impedance-matching techniques. Conventional matching networks are optimum for narrowband rectifiers, with improved peak PCE at a given frequency but reduced efficiency when frequency drifts occur. The proposed method, however, sacrifices minor peak PCE for broader frequency operation. This makes it ideal for use in applications that require uniform performance across varying input conditions but less than ideal for heavily optimized narrowband applications.
The other limitation is that while the design realizes high PCE at input power levels of between 15 dBm and 20 dBm, with very low power levels (<0 dBm) its performance can be undermined by the drop in threshold voltage across the CMOS transistors. Conventional diode-connected rectifiers can yield better efficiency in ultra-low-power operations. Similarly, at input power levels greater than 25 dBm, self-heating and reliability problems can undermine the operation of the rectifier.
Scalability to yet higher CMOS process nodes is yet another consideration. Advanced nodes have lower threshold voltages and better transistor mobility, which would make the PCE even more efficient. Experimental validation of the proposed rectifier via prototyping and experimentation is an important area of research for future investigation. While this study primarily focused on circuit-level optimization, we acknowledge that environmental factors such as reflection medium, distance, and multipath effects in wireless power transfer (WPT) scenarios can impact efficiency. Future experimental work will explore these system-level interactions to provide a more comprehensive validation of the proposed rectifier design. Additionally, future studies will investigate the influence of varying transmission distances and different reflection surfaces on received power levels, enabling a broader understanding of real-world deployment challenges.
In summary, the new rectifier offers high efficiency, wideband operation, and input mismatch insensitivity, and is therefore an extremely promising candidate for future RF energy harvesting and WPT applications. While conventional impedance-matching techniques can still be employed for optimal-case narrowband designs, this paper highlights the benefits of hybridizing body-biasing and compensated matching techniques for enhanced performance in different RF environments. Future work will involve experimental validation and extending the design to the higher power levels and frequencies.

6. Conclusions

This study introduces a wideband pMOS rectifier with modified matching and body-biasing, designed using 0.18 μm CMOS technology. Simulations indicate that the proposed approach achieves a peak PCE of 60.5% at 700 MHz with an input power of 20 dBm. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first implementation of a rectifier combining modified matching and body-biasing to enhance the efficiency of a mid-range RF power CMOS rectifier.
The advantages of the new approach are primarily its robustness to input mismatch conditions and its ability to maintain efficiency under a wide band of frequencies. Compared to the conventional impedance-matching rectifiers, which are extremely sensitive to frequency variations and input conditions, the new configuration also shows consistent PCE behavior under dynamic operating conditions. Furthermore, analysis of transistor on-resistance ( R o n ) and body-biasing effects highlights the importance of optimal circuit design for enhanced conduction efficiency. While this effort has focused on circuit-level optimizations, subsequent research will attempt to experimentally validate the design through prototyping and extend its relevance to higher power levels and diverse RF environments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.J.; methodology, W.J., A.B. and B.G.; software, W.J., A.B. and R.K.P.; writing—original draft preparation, W.J.; writing—review and editing, W.J., A.B. and R.K.P.; supervision, R.K.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

The study did not involve humans.

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained in the paper.

Acknowledgments

This research work was supported in part by the MIC/SCOPE Grant Number: JP215010003 and in part by the JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number: 22K14260. This work was also supported by the activities of VLSI Design and Education Center (VDEC), The University of Tokyo in collaboration with the Cadence Corporation, the Mentor Graphics Corporation, and Keysight Technologies Japan, Ltd.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
FoMFigure of Merit
IoTInternet of Things
PCEPower Conversion Efficiency
RFRadio Frequency

References

  1. Li, L.; Zhao, X.; Geng, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, L. Robust Beamforming Design for Swipt-Based Multi-Radiowireless Mesh Network with Cooperative Jamming. Information 2020, 11, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lei, W.; Zhan, M. Beamforming and Antenna Grouping Design for the Multi-Antenna Relay with Energy Harvesting to Improve Secrecy Rate. Information 2016, 7, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nariman, M.; Shirinfar, F.; Pamarti, S.; Rofougaran, M.; Rofougaran, R.; De Flaviis, F. A Compact Millimeter-Wave Energy Transmission System for Wireless Applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, Seattle, WA, USA, 2–4 June 2013. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hashimoto, T.; Tanzawa, T. Design Space Exploration of Antenna Impedance and On-Chip Rectifier for Microwave Wireless Power Transfer. Electronics 2022, 11, 3218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wu, P.; Huang, S.Y.; Zhou, W.; Ren, Z.H.; Liu, Z.; Huang, K.; Liu, C. High-Efficient Rectifier with Extended Input Power Range Based on Self-Tuning Impedance Matching. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2018, 28, 1116–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mansour, M.M.; Torigoe, S.; Yamamoto, S.; Kanaya, H. Compact and Simple High-Efficient Dual-Band RF-DC Rectifier for Wireless Electromagnetic Energy Harvesting. Electronics 2021, 10, 1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fokin, G.; Volgushev, D. Model for Interference Evaluation in 5G Millimeter-Wave Ultra-Dense Network with Location-Aware Beamforming. Information 2023, 14, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mohamed, M.M.; Fahmy, G.A.; Abdel-Rahman, A.B.; Allam, A.; Barakat, A.; Abo-Zahhad, M.; Jia, H.; Pokharel, R.K. High-Efficiency CMOS RF-to-DC Rectifier Based on Dynamic Threshold Reduction Technique for Wireless Charging Applications. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 46826–46832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Awad, M.; Benech, P.; Duchamp, J.M. Performance Comparison of RF Energy Harvesting Rectifiers Designed in CMOS FDSOI 28 Nm with Dynamic Back Gate Biasing and BiCMOS 55 Nm Technology. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2021, 63, 1411–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Al-Absi, M.A.; Alkhalifa, I.M.; Mohammed, A.A.; Al-Khulaifi, A.A. A CMOS Rectifier Employing Body Biasing Scheme for RF Energy Harvesting. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 105606–105611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Godinho, A.; Yang, Z.; Dong, T.; Gonçalves, L.; Mendes, P.; Wen, Y.; Li, P.; Jiang, Z. A Dynamic Threshold Cancellation Technique for a High-Power Conversion Efficiency Cmos Rectifier. Sensors 2021, 21, 6883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jordan, W.; Barakat, A.; Gyawali, B.; Pokharel, R.K. High-Efficiency Wideband Inductor-Less Platinum-Band CMOS Rectifier. AEU—Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2025, 193, 155737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, R.; Qi, Y.; Lavasani, H.M. A Highly Efficient CMOS Rectifier for Ultra-Low-Power Ambient RF Energy Harvesting. In Proceedings of the Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Lansing, MI, USA, 9–11 August 2021; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 212–215. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jordan, W.; Barakat, A.; Gyawali, B.; Pokharel, R.K. High-Efficiency Platinum-Band CMOS Rectifier Using Modified Body-Biasing Technique. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Technol. Lett. 2024, 34, 1290–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Abouzied, M.A.; Ravichandran, K.; Sanchez-Sinencio, E. A Fully Integrated Reconfigurable Self-Startup RF Energy-Harvesting System with Storage Capability. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2017, 52, 704–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tsai, C.H.; Liao, I.N.; Pakasiri, C.; Pan, H.C.; Wang, Y.J. A Wideband 20 MW UHF Rectifier in CMOS. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2015, 25, 388–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zeng, Z.; Shen, S.; Zhong, X.; Li, X.; Tsui, C.Y.; Bermak, A.; Murch, R.; Sanchez-Sinencio, E. Design of Sub-Gigahertz Reconfigurable RF Energy Harvester From-22 to 4 DBm with 99.8% Peak MPPT Power Efficiency. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2019, 54, 2601–2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, X.; Lu, Y.; Huang, M.; Martins, R.P. A 2.4-GHz Mid-Field CMOS Wireless Power Receiver Achieving 46% Maximum PCE and 163-MW Output Power. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs 2020, 67, 360–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gyawali, B.; Pokharel, R.K.; Thapa, S.K.; Barakat, A.; Shinohara, N. New Rectification Technique Employing Auxiliary Rectifier for Resonance Control Achieving Compact Size and High Efficiency in CMOS. IEEE Solid. State Circuits Lett. 2024, 7, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Two-stage Dickson (voltage doubler) circuit for comparing the effect of the biasing technique and matching technique: (a) inductor-less nMOS native rectifier (case A), (b) pMOS body-biasing from the output voltage (case B), (c) modified matching, pMOS transistor body-biasing from the drain side (Case C proposed), and (d) PCE versus frequency from (ac). The values of the inductors, capacitors, and transistors dimensions are as follows: L 0 = 13.5 nH, L 1 = 7.24 nH, C 0 = 550 fF, C 1 = C 2 = C 3 = C 4 = 25 pF. The transistor widths are M 1 = M 2 = M 4 = 200 μm, width of M 3 = 190.4 μm, with all transistors having a length of 0.18 μm in all three cases.
Figure 1. Two-stage Dickson (voltage doubler) circuit for comparing the effect of the biasing technique and matching technique: (a) inductor-less nMOS native rectifier (case A), (b) pMOS body-biasing from the output voltage (case B), (c) modified matching, pMOS transistor body-biasing from the drain side (Case C proposed), and (d) PCE versus frequency from (ac). The values of the inductors, capacitors, and transistors dimensions are as follows: L 0 = 13.5 nH, L 1 = 7.24 nH, C 0 = 550 fF, C 1 = C 2 = C 3 = C 4 = 25 pF. The transistor widths are M 1 = M 2 = M 4 = 200 μm, width of M 3 = 190.4 μm, with all transistors having a length of 0.18 μm in all three cases.
Information 16 00212 g001
Figure 2. Simulated W L ratio versus the reflection coefficient S 11 for the transistor (a) M1 and transistor (b) M2 at the optimal center frequency ( f 0 ) of 0.7 GHz for three cases.
Figure 2. Simulated W L ratio versus the reflection coefficient S 11 for the transistor (a) M1 and transistor (b) M2 at the optimal center frequency ( f 0 ) of 0.7 GHz for three cases.
Information 16 00212 g002
Figure 3. Simulated W L ratio versus the PCE value for the transistor (a) M1 and transistor (b) M2 at the optimal center frequency ( f 0 ) of 0.7 GHz for three cases.
Figure 3. Simulated W L ratio versus the PCE value for the transistor (a) M1 and transistor (b) M2 at the optimal center frequency ( f 0 ) of 0.7 GHz for three cases.
Information 16 00212 g003
Figure 4. Simulated W L ratio versus the PCE value for the transistor (a) M3 and (b) M4 at the optimal f 0 of 0.7 GHz for three cases.
Figure 4. Simulated W L ratio versus the PCE value for the transistor (a) M3 and (b) M4 at the optimal f 0 of 0.7 GHz for three cases.
Information 16 00212 g004
Figure 5. Comparison for the simulated PCE value versus input power at (a) 1.15 KΩ, (b) 1.65 KΩ, (c) 2.15 KΩ, and (d) 2.65 KΩ.
Figure 5. Comparison for the simulated PCE value versus input power at (a) 1.15 KΩ, (b) 1.65 KΩ, (c) 2.15 KΩ, and (d) 2.65 KΩ.
Information 16 00212 g005
Figure 6. Simulated PCE of the proposed rectifier for various corners and temperatures at different input powers.
Figure 6. Simulated PCE of the proposed rectifier for various corners and temperatures at different input powers.
Information 16 00212 g006
Figure 7. (a) Layout design of the proposed rectifier; (b) post-layout simulation S 11 value for various input powers at the same optimal efficiency load resistance of 1.15 KΩ.
Figure 7. (a) Layout design of the proposed rectifier; (b) post-layout simulation S 11 value for various input powers at the same optimal efficiency load resistance of 1.15 KΩ.
Information 16 00212 g007
Figure 8. (a) Post-layout simulation peak PCE value versus input power at different load resistance value for 700 MHz frequency; (b) post-layout simulation PCE versus frequency at different input powers with 1.15 KΩ load resistance.
Figure 8. (a) Post-layout simulation peak PCE value versus input power at different load resistance value for 700 MHz frequency; (b) post-layout simulation PCE versus frequency at different input powers with 1.15 KΩ load resistance.
Information 16 00212 g008
Table 1. Comparison of proposed CMOS rectifier.
Table 1. Comparison of proposed CMOS rectifier.
Ref. f 0 (GHz)PCE (%) P i n (dBm) R L (Ω)CMOS TechnologyArea
{Active Area}
(mm2)
Figure of Merit (FoM)
(Hz/mm2)
[15]0.9152501 M180 nm5.29-
[16]0.931.8182 K65 nm0.4095-
[17]0.91534.41.310 K180 nm0.4-
[18]2.44625.52428 nm0.705-
[19]2.4–3.546.8 (peak)221 K180 nm0.4218122.048
{0.2106}
This work0.2–2.5>50201.15 K180 nm0.7007198.587
0.760.5 (peak){0.48}
FoM = η m a x × F B W A r e a ( m m 2 ) × f o [19], center frequency ( f o ) = f H + f L 2 , f H and f L are high and low frequencies respectively, fractional bandwidth (FBW) = f H f L f o .
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jordan, W.; Barakat, A.; Gyawali, B.; Pokharel, R.K. Enhanced RF Power Conversion for Sensor Networks and Embedded Sensors. Information 2025, 16, 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16030212

AMA Style

Jordan W, Barakat A, Gyawali B, Pokharel RK. Enhanced RF Power Conversion for Sensor Networks and Embedded Sensors. Information. 2025; 16(3):212. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16030212

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jordan, Willy, Adel Barakat, Babita Gyawali, and Ramesh K. Pokharel. 2025. "Enhanced RF Power Conversion for Sensor Networks and Embedded Sensors" Information 16, no. 3: 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16030212

APA Style

Jordan, W., Barakat, A., Gyawali, B., & Pokharel, R. K. (2025). Enhanced RF Power Conversion for Sensor Networks and Embedded Sensors. Information, 16(3), 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16030212

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop