Evaluating the Impact of Instagram Engagement Metrics on Corporate Revenue Growth: Introducing the Loyalty Rate
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- -
- What is the relationship between revenue growth and social media measures like reach, impressions, and interaction rate?
- -
- Is the loyalty rate, as suggested in this study, a reliable and accurate way to gauge Instagram follower loyalty?
- -
- In terms of revenue forecasting, what is the statistical correlation between the company’s monthly revenue and the loyalty rate, and how does this indicator stack up against other traditional metrics?
- -
- How can businesses use these insights to increase the return on their digital strategy, and what are the practical implications for social media management based on the data obtained?
2. Social Media Marketing
2.1. Contextualization of the Role of Social Networks in the Business World
2.2. Digital Marketing vs. Traditional Methods: Competitors or the Perfect Synergy?
2.3. Social Media’s Function in Marketing Goals
2.4. Social Network Consumer Behavior
2.4.1. Brand Awareness
2.4.2. Perception of Brand Awareness Among Consumers
2.5. Theories and Models of Social Media Marketing
2.5.1. Theories of Personal Behaviour
- Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): this model is used to understand how the perception of ease of use and usefulness affects the adoption of technologies, often applied to the study of social media [37].
- Theory of Reasoned Action and Theory of Planned Behaviour: both predict behaviours based on attitudes and social norms, which is useful for understanding voluntary participation in activities on social networks [38].
2.5.2. Theories of Social Behaviour
2.5.3. Theories of Mass Communication
2.5.4. Integrated Communication Theories with Metrics Analysis
2.6. Metrics on Social Media Are Crucial for Evaluating Performance and Sales Impact
2.7. How to Evaluate Metrics
2.7.1. Social Network Analysis Steps
- Discovery: finding hidden patterns and structures.
- Monitoring: selecting the data source, such Facebook or Twitter, and establishing the strategy and technique to be used.
- Preparation: although the original model does not completely outline the required processes, this phase gets the data ready for analysis.
- Analysis: various techniques, such as opinion extraction and social network analysis, are used, depending on the goals of the study.
2.7.2. Technologies and Tools for Social Network Analysis
3. Methods
3.1. Methodology of Research
3.2. Data Source
- (a)
- Reach (unique number of people who saw the content);
- (b)
- Impressions (likes, shares, comments, and number of times the content was viewed);
- (c)
- Virality rate (actions taken by users who saw the content);
- (d)
- Growth of followers over time;
- (e)
- Frequency of publications and content format (reels, posts, and carousels);
- (f)
- Financial data: company revenue data for the last three years by month.
- (a)
- Impressions = Number provided by Facebook’s MetaBusiness.
- (b)
- Reach = Number provided by Facebook’s MetaBusiness.
- (c)
- No. of Interactions = Number provided by Facebook’s MetaBusiness.
- (d)
- Page interaction rate = (Accounts with interaction/Accounts reached) × 100.
- (e)
- Virality rate = (Interactions/Impressions) × 100.
- (f)
- Δ% Posts = (Current month’s posts/Previous month’s posts)/Previous month’s posts.
- (g)
- Δ% Impressions = (Current month’s impressions/Previous month’s impressions)/Previous month’s impressions.
- (h)
- Δ% Reach = (Current month’s reach/Previous month’s reach)/Previous month’s reach.
- (i)
- Δ% No. of interactions = (Current month’s interactions/Previous month’s interactions)/Previous month’s interactions.
- (j)
- Δ% Page Interaction Rate = (Current Month’s Interaction Rate/Previous Month’s Interaction Rate)/Previous Month’s Interaction Rate.
- (k)
- Δ% Virality rate = (Current month’s virality rate/Previous month’s virality rate)/Previous month’s virality rate.
3.3. Data Collection Method
- (a)
- Annual Reach = Unique number of people who viewed the content throughout each year;
- (b)
- Annual Impressions = Total content views, including all interactions for each year;
- (c)
- Annual Virality Rate = Percentage of actions (likes, shares, and comments) performed by users who saw the content in relation to the total number of people reached per year;
- (d)
- Annual Follower Growth = Increase in the number of followers throughout each year.
- (a)
- Monthly Billing = Total revenue generated by the company at the end of each month.
- (b)
- Monthly Revenue Growth Rate = Percentage of revenue growth from one month to the next.
3.4. Results Analysis
- (a)
- Averages: used to comprehend the typical monthly performance of income and social media analytics.
- (b)
- Standard Deviations: used to quantify the extent to which data deviate from the monthly average.
- (c)
- Minimum and Maximum Values: used to determine the lowest and maximum points in the revenue and performance of social media throughout the course of the months.
- (d)
- Correlation: Used to ascertain the connection between social media metrics and monthly revenue, using Pearson’s correlation. This assisted in determining whether the variables under analysis have a positive or negative connection.
4. Analysis and Discussion of Results
4.1. Descriptive Analysis of Metrics
4.2. Correlation Between Metrics
4.3. Regression Analysis
4.4. New Proposed Metric: Loyalty Rate
5. Discussion
5.1. Theoretical Implications
5.2. Practical Implications
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Alalwan, A.A.; Rana, N.P.; Dwivedi, Y.K.; Algharabat, R. Social media in marketing: A review and analysis of the existing literature. Telemat. Inform. 2017, 34, 1177–1190. [Google Scholar]
- Dwivedi, Y.K.; Ismagilova, E.; Hughes, D.L.; Carlson, J.; Filieri, R.; Jacobson, J.; Jain, V.; Karjaluoto, H.; Kefi, H.; Krishen, A.S.; et al. Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2021, 59, 102168. [Google Scholar]
- Duffett, R.G. The YouTube marketing communication effect on cognitive, affective and behavioural attitudes among Generation Z consumers. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hudson, S.; Roth, M.S.; Madden, T.J.; Hudson, R. The effects of social media on emotions, brand relationship quality, and word of mouth: An empirical study of music festival attendees. Tour. Manag. 2016, 47, 68–76. [Google Scholar]
- Batra, R.; Keller, K.L.; Strecher, A. Leveraging consumer insights to improve digital and social media marketing. J. Consum. Psychol. 2018, 28, 165–169. [Google Scholar]
- Felix, R.; Rauschnabel, P.A.; Hinsch, C. Elements of strategic social media marketing: A holistic framework. J. Bus. Res. 2017, 70, 118–126. [Google Scholar]
- Lamberton, C.; Stephen, A.T. A thematic exploration of digital, social media, and mobile marketing: Research evolution from 2000 to 2015 and an agenda for future inquiry. J. Mark. 2016, 80, 146–172. [Google Scholar]
- De Vries, N.J.; Gensler, S.; Leeflang, P.S. Effects of traditional advertising and social messages on brand-building metrics and customer acquisition. J. Mark. 2017, 81, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- Statista. Global Social Networks Ranked by Number of Users 2020. Statistica. 2020. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/ (accessed on 24 April 2024).
- Zachlod, C.; Samuel, O.; Ochsner, A.; Werthmüller, S. Analytics of social media data—State of characteristics and application. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 144, 1064–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saravanakumar, M.; Suganthalakshmi, T. Social Media Marketing. Life Sci. J. 2012, 9, 4444–4451. [Google Scholar]
- Scott, D.M. The New Rules of Marketing and PR: How to Use News Releases, Blogs, Podcasting, Viral Marketing and Online Media to Reach Buyers Directly; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Chatterjee, S.; Kar, A.K. Why do small and medium enterprises use social media marketing and what is the impact: Empirical insights from India. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 53, 102103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harrigan, P.; Miles, M.P.; Fang, Y.; Roy, S.K. The role of social media in the engagement and information processes of social CRM. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 54, 102151. [Google Scholar]
- Gillin, P. The New Influencers: A Marketer’s Guide to the New Social Media; Linden Publishing: Fresno, CA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Dubbelink, S.I.; Herrando, C.; Constantinides, E. Social media marketing as a branding strategy in extraordinary times: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evans, D. Social Media Marketing: The Next Generation of Business Engagement; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Ilodigwe, A.O.; Uzoh, B.C. Utilization of social media for marketing by entrepreneurs in Anambra state: Challenges and opportunities. Afr. J. Soc. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14, 4444–4451. [Google Scholar]
- Vinerean, S.; Opreana, A. Measuring customer engagement in social media marketing: A higher-order model. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2021, 16, 2633–2654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tuten, T.L.; Solomon, M.R. Social Media Marketing; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Moorman, C. Capitalizing on Social Media Investments. The CMO Survey. 2020. Available online: https://cmosurvey.org/tag/investments/ (accessed on 12 April 2024).
- Hadad, C. Why Some 13-Year-Olds Check Social Media 100 Times a Day. CNN.com. 13 October 2015. Available online: http://edition.cnn.com/2015/10/05/health/being-13-teens-social-media-study/index.html (accessed on 12 April 2024).
- Lee, K.-H.; Kim, J.W. Integrating suppliers into green product innovation development: An empirical case study in the semiconductor industry. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2011, 20, 527–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alghizzawi, M. The role of digital marketing in consumer behavior: A survey. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Lang. Stud. 2019, 3, 24–31. [Google Scholar]
- Cao, G.; Duan, Y.; Edwards, J.S.; Dwivedi, Y.K. Understanding managers’ attitudes and behavioral intentions towards using artificial intelligence for organizational decision-making. Technovation 2021, 106, 102312. [Google Scholar]
- Dazeinfo. The Number of Internet Users Worldwide Reached 4.1 Billion In July 2018. Dazeinfo. 2018. Available online: https://dazeinfo.com/2018/07/27/facebook-internet-users-worldwide-online/ (accessed on 12 April 2024).
- Shahbaznezhad, H.; Dolan, R.; Rashidirad, M. The role of social media content format and platform in users’ engagement behavior. J. Interact. Mark. 2021, 53, 47–65. [Google Scholar]
- Ghazie, D.A.; Dolah, J. How digital marketing affects consumer behavior. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Creative Media, Design & Technology, Surkarta, Indonesia, 25 September 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Revythi, A.; Tselios, N. Extension of technology acceptance model by using system usability scale to assess behavioral intention to use e-learning. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2019, 24, 2341–2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peters, L. The new interactive media: One-to-one, but who to whom? Mark. Intell. Plan. 1998, 16, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanna, R.; Rohm, A.; Crittenden, V.L. We’re all connected: The power of the social media ecosystem. Bus. Horiz. 2011, 54, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ngai, E.W.T.; Tao, S.S.C.; Moon, K.K.L. Social media research: Theories, constructs, and conceptual frameworks. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2015, 35, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babatunde, S.O.; Odejide, O.A.; Edunjobi, T.E.; Ogundipe, D.O. The role of AI in marketing personalization: A theoretical exploration of consumer engagement strategies. Int. J. Manag. Entrep. Res. 2024, 6, 936–949. [Google Scholar]
- Roos, J.M.; Kazemi, A. The five factor model of personality as predictor of online shopping: Analyzing data from a large representative sample of Swedish internet users. Cogent Psychol. 2022, 9, 2024640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Digman, J.M. Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 1990, 41, 417–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allbeck, J.M.; Badler, N.I. Creating crowd variation with the ocean personality model. In Proceedings of the AAMAS08: 7th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems, Estoril, Portugal, 12–16 May 2008; Volume 3, pp. 1217–1220. [Google Scholar]
- Musa, H.G.; Fatmawati, I.; Nuryakin, N.; Suyanto, M. Marketing Research Trends Using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): A Comprehensive Review Of Researches (2002–2022). Cogent Bus. Manag. 2024, 11, 2329375. [Google Scholar]
- Sok, J.; Borges, J.R.; Schmidt, P.; Ajzen, I. Farmer behaviour as reasoned action: A critical review of research with the theory of planned behaviour. J. Agric. Econ. 2021, 72, 388–412. [Google Scholar]
- Kelman, H.C. Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change. J. Confl. Resolut. 1958, 2, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poecze, F.; Strauss, C. Social capital on social media: Concepts, measurement techniques and trends in operationalization. Information 2020, 11, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colliander, J.; Dahlén, M. Following the fashionable friend: The power of social media weighing the publicity effectiveness of blogsversus online magazines. J. Advert. Res. 2011, 51, 313–320. [Google Scholar]
- Zhong, Y.; Shapoval, V.; Busser, J. The role of parasocial relationship in social media marketing: Testing a model among baby boomers. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2021, 33, 1870–1891. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Y.; Mak, P.I.; Zhou, Y. Self-tracking charge pump for fast-locking PLL. Electron. Lett. 2010, 46, 755–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reinold, T.; Tropp, J. Integrated marketing communications: How can we measure its effectiveness? J. Mark. Commun. 2012, 18, 113–132. [Google Scholar]
- Blakeman, R. Integrated Marketing Communication: Creative Strategy from Idea to Implementation; Rowman & Littlefield: Lanham, MD, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Marques, V. Marketing Digital de A a Z; Digital 360: Milan, Italy, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Swonkie. Swonkie: A Social Media Management Platform. 2024. Available online: https://swonkie.com (accessed on 24 May 2024).
- Singh, P.; Dwivedi, Y.K.; Kahlon, K.S.; Sawhney, R.S.; Alalwan, A.A.; Rana, N.P. Smart Monitoring and Controlling of Government Policies Using Social Media and Cloud Computing. Inf. Syst. Front. 2020, 22, 315–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaplan, A.M.; Haenlein, M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus. Horiz. 2010, 53, 59–68. [Google Scholar]
- Zeferino, A. Digital Marketing Analytics; Sabedoria Alternativa Edições: Lisboa, Portugal, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Crisci, A.; Grasso, V.; Nesi, P.; Pantaleo, G.; Paoli, I.; Zaza, I. Predicting TV programme audience by using Twitter based metrics. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2018, 77, 12203–12232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, D.; Chen, H.; Lusch, R.; Li, S.H. Social media analytics and intelligence. IEEE Intell. Syst. 2010, 25, 13–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, W.; Gordon, M.D. The power of social media analytics. Commun. ACM 2014, 57, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stieglitz, S.; Dang-Xuan, L.; Bruns, A.; Neuberger, C. Social media analytics. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2014, 6, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belcastro, L.; Marozzo, F.; Talia, D.; Trunfio, P. A parallel library for social media analytics. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on High Performance Computing & Simulation (HPCS), Genoa, Italy, 17–21 July 2017; pp. 683–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arnaboldi, M.; Azzone, G.; Sidorova, Y. Governing social media: The emergence of hybridised boundary objects. Account. Audit. Account. J. 2017, 30, 821–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baur, A.W. Harnessing the social web to enhance insights into people’s opinions in business, government and public administration. Inf. Syst. Front. 2017, 19, 231–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parsons, A.L.; Lepkowska-White, E. Social Media Marketing Management: A Conceptual Framework. J. Internet Commer. 2018, 17, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.H.; Sabherwal, R.; Bock, G.W.; Kim, H.M. Understanding Social Media Monitoring and Online Rumors. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2021, 61, 507–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Misirlis, N.; Vlachopoulou, M. Social media metrics and analytics in marketing–S3M: A mapping literature review. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2018, 38, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoffman, D.L.; Fodor, M. Can You Measure the ROI of Your Social Media Marketing? MIT Sloan Management Review. 2010. Available online: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/can-you-measure-the-roi-of-your-social-media-marketing/ (accessed on 23 March 2024).
- Stieglitz, S.; Dang-Xuan, L. Social media and political communication: A social media analytics framework. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 2013, 3, 1277–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stieglitz, S.; Mirbabaie, M.; Ross, B.; Neuberger, C. Social media analytics—Challenges in topic discovery, data collection, and data preparation. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2018, 39, 156–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aral, S.; Dellarocas, C.; Godes, D. Introduction to the special issue—Social media and business transformation: A framework for research. Inf. Syst. Res. 2013, 24, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacobsen, B.N.; Beer, D. Quantified nostalgia: Social media, metrics, and memory. Soc. Media+ Soc. 2021, 7, 20563051211008822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cvijikj, I.P.; Michahelles, F. Online engagement factors on Facebook brand pages. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 2013, 3, 843–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Griffiths, M.; McLean, R. Unleashing corporate communications via social media: A UK study of brand management and conversations with customers. J. Cust. Behav. 2015, 14, 147–162. [Google Scholar]
- Misirlis, N.; Vlachopoulou, M. A Unified Framework for Decision-Making Process on Social Media Analytics. In Operational Research in the Digital Era–ICT Challenges; Sifaleras, A., Petridis, K., Eds.; Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- KOR Creatives. Dados Fornecidos Pela Kor Creatives; KOR Creatives: Faro, Portugal, 2024. [Google Scholar]
Priorities | % of What Companies Use |
---|---|
Brand awareness and building | 84.2 |
Customer retention | 54.3 |
Acquisition of new customers | 51.1 |
Brand promotions | 48.4 |
New product introduction | 45.1 |
Customer service | 39.1 |
Recruitment | 38.0 |
Market study | 22.3 |
Target new markets | 17.4 |
Identify new product opportunities | 15.2 |
Sales with VAT | January EUR | February EUR | March EUR | April EUR | May EUR | June EUR | July EUR | August EUR | September EUR | October EUR | November EUR | December EUR | Total EUR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022 | 28,875.65 | 13,597.51 | 26,117.35 | 26,059.13 | 26,957.13 | 38,176.41 | 57,265.23 | 69,533.34 | 32,578.86 | 53,494.95 | 62,909.43 | 36,395.25 | 471,960.62 |
2023 | 25,416.87 | 38,090.20 | 45,601.95 | 57,670.55 | 91,351.54 | 59,796.45 | 92,513.32 | 86,478.51 | 54,109.00 | 38,313.96 | 66,132.42 | 56,938.41 | 712,413.18 |
2024 | 48,992.84 | 56,687.83 | 86,179.58 | 55,923.23 | 58,585.78 | 89,948.47 | 107,134.27 | 79,474.50 |
Month | Followers | Δ% | Posts | Δ% | Impressions | Δ% | Reach | Δ% | No Interactions | Δ% | Page Interaction Rate | Δ% | Virality Rate | Δ% | Loyalty Rate | Δ% | Revenue EUR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
December 2022 | 825 | 23 | 32,272 | 4541 | 10,279 | 8.7% | 31.9% | 27.2% | 36,395.27 | ||||||||
January 2023 | 879 | 6.5% | 22 | −4.3% | 39,909 | 23.7% | 5376 | 18.4% | 15,591 | 51.7% | 11.6% | 34.0% | 39.1% | 22.7% | 29.7% | 2.5% | 25,416.87 |
February 2023 | 907 | 3.2% | 23 | 4.5% | 41,943 | 5.1% | 4848 | −9.8% | 17,730 | 13.7% | 12.5% | 8.1% | 42.3% | 8.2% | 29.6% | 0.0% | 38,090.20 |
March 2023 | 914 | 0.8% | 22 | −4.3% | 39,354 | −6.2% | 39,354 | 711.8% | 180,790 | 919.7% | 12.1% | −3.1% | 45.9% | 8.7% | 26.4% | −3.2% | 45,601.95 |
April 2023 | 1010 | 10.5% | 18 | −18.2% | 48,624 | 23.6% | 9379 | −76.2% | 27,921 | −84.6% | 16.6% | 36.5% | 57.4% | 25.0% | 28.9% | 2.4% | 57,670.55 |
May 2023 | 1056 | 4.6% | 25 | 38.9% | 55,802 | 14.8% | 6197 | −33.9% | 29,035 | 4.0% | 14.4% | −13.1% | 52.0% | −9.4% | 27.7% | −1.2% | 91,351.54 |
June 2023 | 1075 | 1.8% | 17 | −32.0% | 41,746 | −25.2% | 5234 | −15.5% | 23,049 | −20.6% | 13.9% | −3.3% | 55.2% | 6.1% | 25.2% | −2.5% | 59,796.45 |
July 2023 | 1110 | 3.3% | 16 | −5.9% | 55,208 | 32.2% | 5723 | 9.3% | 23,245 | 0.9% | 92,513.32 | ||||||
August 2023 | 1128 | 1.6% | 24 | 50.0% | 48,598 | −12.0% | 4291 | −25.0% | 86,478.51 | ||||||||
September 2023 | 1163 | 3.1% | 19 | −20.8% | 49,688 | 2.2% | 2851 | −33.6% | 9810 | 12.9% | 19.7% | 65.2% | 65.2% | 54,109.00 | |||
October 2023 | 1202 | 3.4% | 25 | 31.6% | 51,681 | 4.0% | 5760 | 102.0% | 21,376 | 117.9% | 9.2% | −28.4% | 41.4% | 109.5% | 22.3% | −42.9% | 38,313.96 |
November 2023 | 1221 | 1.6% | 21 | −16.0% | 37,571 | −27.3% | 5494 | −4.6% | 12,758 | −40.3% | 6.7% | −26.8% | 34.0% | −17.9% | 19.9% | −2.4% | 66,132.42 |
December 2023 | 1244 | 1.9% | 20 | −4.8% | 42,396 | 12.8% | 5601 | 1.9% | 355 | −97.2% | 0.4% | −94.7% | 0.1% | −99.8% | 42.9% | 23.0% | 56,938.41 |
January 2024 | 1271 | 2.2% | 20 | 0.0% | 38,920 | −8.2% | 3455 | −38.3% | 754 | 112.4% | 1.9% | 131.4% | 48,992.84 | ||||
February 2024 | 1319 | 3.8% | 20 | 0.0% | 52,135 | 34.0% | 3847 | 11.3% | 881 | 16.8% | 1.7% | −12.9% | 56,687.83 | ||||
March 2024 | 1380 | 4.6% | 21 | 5.0% | 68,399 | 31.2% | 8052 | 109.3% | 1000 | 13.5% | 1.5% | −13.5% | 86,179.58 | ||||
April 2024 | 1419 | 2.8% | 22 | 4.8% | 64,506 | −5.7% | 8703 | 8.1% | 946 | −5.4% | 1.5% | 31.0% | 55,923.23 | ||||
May 2024 | 1450 | 2.2% | 21 | −4.5% | 71,177 | 10.3% | 11,846 | 36.1% | 891 | −5.8% | 2.8% | 2.8% | 1.3% | −14.6% | 221.6% | 221.6% | 58,585.78 |
June 2024 | 1495 | 3.1% | 23 | 9.5% | 68,189 | −4.2% | 11,135 | −6.0% | 1303 | 46.2% | 4.1% | 1.4% | 1.9% | 52.7% | 216.2% | −5.4% | 89,948.47 |
July 2024 | 1584 | 6.0% | 33 | 43.5% | 368,299 | 440.1% | 127,641 | 1046.3% | 2151 | 65.1% | 0.5% | −3.7% | 0.1% | −69.4% | 82.8% | −133.5% | 107,134.27 |
August 2024 | 1606 | 1.4% | 20 | −39.4% | 471,699 | 28.1% | 161,275 | 26.4% | 837 | −61.1% | 0.2% | −0.3% | 0.2% | −69.6% | 122.2% | 39.5% | 79,474.50 |
N | Minimum | Maximum | Average | St. Deviation | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reach | 21 | 2851 | 161,275 | 20,981.10 | 42,082.48 |
Impressions | 21 | 32,272 | 471,699 | 85,148.38 | 113,048.37 |
Revenue | 21 | 25,416.87 | 107,134.27 | 63,415.95 | 22,167.53 |
Revenue | Reach | ||
---|---|---|---|
Revenue | Pearson’s correlation | 1 | 0.401 |
Sig. (bilateral) | 0.072 | ||
N | 21 | 21 | |
Reach | Pearson correlation | 0.401 | 1 |
Sig. (bilateral) | 0.072 | ||
N | 21 | 21 |
Coefficients a | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Unstandardised Coefficients | Standardised Coefficients | |||
Model | B | Error | Beta | t |
(Constant) | −65,120.64 | 49,551.60 | −1.314 | |
Reach | 1.25 | 2.34 | 2.64 | 0.533 |
Impressions | −0.442 | 0.882 | −2.54 | −0.502 |
No. of interactions | −0.236 | 0.509 | −0.456 | −0.464 |
Page interaction rate | 2512.92 | 2096.75 | 0.611 | 1.198 |
Followers | 101.27 | 44.87 | 1.13 | 2.26 |
N | Minimum | Maximum | Average | St. Deviation | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Loyalty rate | 15 | 19.9% | 221.6% | 65.8% | 68.2% |
Valid N | 15 |
Loyalty Rate | Revenue | ||
---|---|---|---|
Loyalty rate | Pearson’s correlation | 1 | 0.423 |
Sig. (bilateral) | 0.116 | ||
N | 15 | 15 | |
Revenue | Pearson correlation | 0.423 | 1 |
Sig. (bilateral) | 0.116 | ||
N | 15 | 21 |
Model Summary | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Model | R | R square | Adjusted R square | St. Error of estimate |
1 | 0.423 a | 0.179 | 0.116 |
ANOVA a | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. |
Regression | 1,341,119,759.598 | 1 | 1,341,119,759.598 | 2.840 | 0.116 b |
Residuals | 6,137,922,050.809 | 13 | 472,147,850.062 | ||
Total | 7,479,041,810.407 | 14 |
Coefficients a | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unstandardised Coefficients | Standardised Coefficients | ||||
Model | B | Error | Beta | t | Sig. |
(Constant) | 50,875.31 | 13 | 7934.19 | 6.412 | <0.001 |
Loyalty rate | 143.61 | 14 | 0.423 | 1.685 | 0.116 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sanches, E.; Ramos, C.M.Q. Evaluating the Impact of Instagram Engagement Metrics on Corporate Revenue Growth: Introducing the Loyalty Rate. Information 2025, 16, 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040287
Sanches E, Ramos CMQ. Evaluating the Impact of Instagram Engagement Metrics on Corporate Revenue Growth: Introducing the Loyalty Rate. Information. 2025; 16(4):287. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040287
Chicago/Turabian StyleSanches, Eva, and Célia M.Q. Ramos. 2025. "Evaluating the Impact of Instagram Engagement Metrics on Corporate Revenue Growth: Introducing the Loyalty Rate" Information 16, no. 4: 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040287
APA StyleSanches, E., & Ramos, C. M. Q. (2025). Evaluating the Impact of Instagram Engagement Metrics on Corporate Revenue Growth: Introducing the Loyalty Rate. Information, 16(4), 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040287