Next Article in Journal
Mathematical Modeling: Global Stability Analysis of Super Spreading Transmission of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Toward Building a Functional Image of the Design Object in CAD
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Concept of High-Tech Enterprise Development Management in the Context of Digital Transformation
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Mathematical Models and Nonlinear Optimization in Continuous Maximum Coverage Location Problem

Computation 2022, 10(7), 119; https://doi.org/10.3390/computation10070119
by Sergiy Yakovlev 1,2,*, Oleksii Kartashov 1 and Dmytro Podzeha 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Computation 2022, 10(7), 119; https://doi.org/10.3390/computation10070119
Submission received: 15 June 2022 / Revised: 4 July 2022 / Accepted: 6 July 2022 / Published: 11 July 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1. A continuous version of the maximal covering location problem is relatively new, the contribution of this manuscript should be more clear compared to other publications such as:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305054821000988

2. The formation time charts need a higher resolution. 

3. Extensive proofreading is necessary, e.g., 

(Abstract) an location -> a location, Pyton -> Python

(Conclusion) The authors plan to direct their further research to the study of precisely the optimization problems of packing and covering in areas with variable metric parameters. -> needs to be rewritten

4. It is recommended that Table 1 is moved to Appendix if possible.

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

  In this article, the maximum coverage location 

problem (MCLP), in a continuous formulation, is considered. 

 

  The background is reviewed in Section 2. 

The mathematical model is described in section 3.1. 

The complex object is given by (2), and the optimized 

function is formulated as (5)-(8). In turn, the 

nonlinear unconstrained optimization problem becomes (9). 

 

  The computer approach and optimization software is 

outlined in section 3.2. 

 

  Finally, sone numerical results are presented in 

Section 4. 

 

  The mathematical problem is of scientific importance, 

with extensive applications, and the scientific approach 

seems convincing.   

 

  The reviewer believes this work deserves a publication 

at "Computation" after the following improvements are made. 

 

 

(1) The reviewer wonders whether a theoretical analysis 

could be derived for the numerical method to the optimized 

problem (9). 

 

  The authors should make a remark on this issue in 

the revision. 

 

 

(2) In the existing literature, there have been quite a 

few theoretical analysis for the iterative numerical 

solvers for certain nonlinear optimization problems, 

such as the preconditioned steepest descent (PSD) method. 

These existing works include: 

 

Preconditioned steepest descent methods for some 

nonlinear elliptic equations involving p-Laplacian terms

 

A uniquely solvable, energy stable numerical scheme 

for the functionalized Cahn-Hilliard equation and its 

convergence analysis

 

A second-order energy stable Backward Differentiation 

Formula method for the epitaxial thin film equation 

with slope selection

 

An energy stable Fourier pseudo-spectral numerical 

scheme for the square phase field crystal equation

 

Structure-preserving, energy stable numerical 

schemes for a liquid thin film coarsening model

 

An iteration solver for the Poisson-Nernst-Planck 

system and its convergence analysis

 

  These related reference works should be cited 

in the revision. 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

-check the figures 1-3

-add a flowchart to describe your approach

-in the problem description section add some basic theorem to better explain the problem

-add some more illustrations about the equations, how eq. 11 is obtained?

-in the result section, there are no comparisons, to better show the advantages of your algorithms, some comparisons with new related, methods are required

-add some remarks about the potential improvement by the use of a new optimization scheme such as:Deep learned recurrent type-3 fuzzy system: Application for renewable energy modeling/prediction

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Line 202: "In [29, 30], ... (line 202)" should use Ref [29, 30] or AuthorName depending on the citation rules of this journal

 

Lines 218-215 (Eq.(4)) :  the g^0 (?) symbols are garbled

Lines 298-313 (Eq.(14)) : same as above

Line 335: same as above, please look for more such occurrences yourself

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The paper can be accepted in my opinion,

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop