Next Article in Journal
Effects of Peer and Teacher Support on Students’ Creative Thinking: Emotional Intelligence as a Mediator and Emotion Regulation Strategy as a Moderator
Previous Article in Journal
The Importance of Individual and Expert Knowledge Grows as Clan Identity Diminishes: The Bedouin of Southern Israel Adapt to Anthropocene Ecology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Systematic Review

The Relationship Between Children’s Indoor Loose Parts Play and Cognitive Development: A Systematic Review

1
Early Childhood Curriculum Studies, MacEwan University, Edmonton, AB T5J 4S2, Canada
2
Community University Partnership, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada
3
Department of Educational Counselling, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB T1K 3M4, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Intell. 2025, 13(5), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13050052
Submission received: 6 February 2025 / Revised: 22 March 2025 / Accepted: 15 April 2025 / Published: 23 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Studies on Cognitive Processes)

Abstract

Children’s engagement with toys and play materials can contribute to the foundational cognitive processes that drive learning. Loose parts are interactive, open-ended materials originally not designed as toys but can be incorporated into children’s play (e.g., acorns, cardboard, and fabric). Practitioners and researchers widely endorse loose parts for fostering creativity, divergent thinking, and problem-solving skills. Despite these recommendations, research on their specific role in young children’s cognitive development remains limited. This systematic review examines how indoor loose parts play has been studied in relation to young children’s (0–6 years) cognitive development. Following PRISMA guidelines, searches in bibliographic databases and forward and backward citation tracking identified 5721 studies published until December 2024. We identified 25 studies and evaluated the quality and risk of bias. Studies focused on children’s general cognitive outcomes, language development, and specific cognitive subdomains, with many reporting positive associations between children’s play materials and cognitive development. However, five studies found no such associations, and another seven did not address the relationship between play materials and outcomes. Despite methodological variation across studies, our systematic review identified a relationship between play materials similar to loose parts and children's problem-solving, creativity, academic skills (reading and math), and both convergent and divergent thinking. Notably, only one study explicitly used the term “loose parts.”Our review identified empirical and methodological gaps regarding the relationship between play materials and cognitive development, which can inform future research.
Keywords: play; cognitive development; loose parts; loose parts play; LPP; indoor play play; cognitive development; loose parts; loose parts play; LPP; indoor play

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cankaya, O.; Martin, M.; Haugen, D. The Relationship Between Children’s Indoor Loose Parts Play and Cognitive Development: A Systematic Review. J. Intell. 2025, 13, 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13050052

AMA Style

Cankaya O, Martin M, Haugen D. The Relationship Between Children’s Indoor Loose Parts Play and Cognitive Development: A Systematic Review. Journal of Intelligence. 2025; 13(5):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13050052

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cankaya, Ozlem, Mackenzie Martin, and Dana Haugen. 2025. "The Relationship Between Children’s Indoor Loose Parts Play and Cognitive Development: A Systematic Review" Journal of Intelligence 13, no. 5: 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13050052

APA Style

Cankaya, O., Martin, M., & Haugen, D. (2025). The Relationship Between Children’s Indoor Loose Parts Play and Cognitive Development: A Systematic Review. Journal of Intelligence, 13(5), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13050052

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop