Next Article in Journal
Titanium Dioxide Microscale and Macroscale Structures: A Mini-Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Relationship between Nanomechanical Responses of Interfacial Intermetallic Compound Layers and Impact Reliability of Solder Joints
Previous Article in Journal
Graphene Oxide-Polypyrrole Coating for Functional Ceramics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Size Distribution, Mechanical and Electrical Properties of CuO Nanowires Grown by Modified Thermal Oxidation Methods
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 10
Issue 6
10.3390/nano10061189
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Vertically-Aligned Multi-Walled Carbon Nano Tube Pillars with Various Diameters under Compression: Pristine and NbTiN Coated

by
Amir Mirza Gheitaghy
*,
René H. Poelma
,
Leandro Sacco
,
Sten Vollebregt
and
Guo Qi Zhang
Department of Microelectronics, Delft University of Technology, Feldmannweg 17, 2628CT Delft, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(6), 1189; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10061189
Submission received: 18 April 2020 / Revised: 16 June 2020 / Accepted: 17 June 2020 / Published: 18 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nano Mechanical Testing of Materials and Devices)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this paper, the compressive stress of pristine and coated vertically-aligned (VA) multi-walled (MW) carbon nanotube (CNT) pillars were investigated using flat-punch nano-indentation. VA-MWCNT pillars of various diameters (30–150 µm) grown by low-pressure chemical vapor deposition on silicon wafer. A conformal brittle coating of niobium-titanium-nitride with high superconductivity temperature was deposited on the VA-MWCNT pillars using atomic layer deposition. The coating together with the pillars could form a superconductive vertical interconnect. The indentation tests showed foam-like behavior of pristine CNTs and ceramic-like fracture of conformal coated CNTs. The compressive strength and the elastic modulus for pristine CNTs could be divided into three regimes of linear elastic, oscillatory plateau, and exponential densification. The elastic modulus of pristine CNTs increased for a smaller pillar diameter. The response of the coated VA-MWCNTs depended on the diffusion depth of the coating in the pillar and their elastic modulus increased with pillar diameter due to the higher sidewall area. Tuning the material properties by conformal coating on various diameter pillars enhanced the mechanical performance and the vertical interconnect access (via) reliability. The results could be useful for quantum computing applications that require high-density superconducting vertical interconnects and reliable operation at reduced temperatures.

1. Introduction

Carbon nanotube (CNT) based structures have attracted widespread scientific interest due to their exceptional mechanical and electrical performance rendering them as promising candidates for advanced applications on various scales [1]. On the macroscopic scale, great progress has been made in CNT actuations by coupling their mechanical and electrical properties in electrostatic [2], electrochemical [3], and electro-thermal [4] actuations. On the micro/nanoscopic scale, CNTs have demonstrated promising applications in Nano Electro Mechanical Systems (NEMS) through successful demonstrations on high-frequency oscillators [5], rotational actuators [6], nanometer tweezers [7], drug delivery [8], and vertical interconnect access (via) [9]. Extremely attractive performances of individual tubes are difficult to reach when they are assembled in the large bundles necessary to make real vias or lines in integrated chips. Two proposed approaches to overcome the current limitations are either to make very tiny local connections that will be needed in future advanced chips or to make carbon–metal composite structures that will be compatible with existing microelectronic processes.
CNTs for electrical interconnects application in integrated chips (IC) have been studied since 2001 [10], but few researchers have investigated CNTs as superconductor interconnect applications and specifically the mechanical strength of the structure under compression for practical applications. One of the required functions for superconductive via is operating under the mechanical loads of packaging. Using the CNT pillar as through silicon via (TSV) filling material [11] or as microbumps in flip-chip packaging [12], needs mechanical strength under compression. To make the superconductive vias, a thin layer of superconducting material with a thickness larger than the London penetration depth (50 nm) is needed to effectively shield radiation [13]. The usual method for superconductive VIA is to deposit a thin layer of superconductive material inside the TSV [14] or to use superconductive microbumps [15].
CNTs are the strongest and stiffest materials in terms of tensile strength, but not nearly as strong under compression. Because of their hollow structure and high aspect ratio, individual tubes tend to undergo buckling when placed under compressive, torsional, or bending stress [16]. Compressive performance of various pristine CNT forms such as individual [17], forest [18], film [19], turf [20], array [21,22], and pillars [23], have been considered in the literature. Among them, vertically aligned (VA) CNT pillars have been recognized as a promising structural material for the fabrication of high aspect ratio (AR) 3D micro- and nano-architectures [24,25]. VACNT pillars represent a promising class of mechanically strong and resilient lightweight materials, capable of supporting large reversible deformation and absorbing mechanical energy [26]. The mechanical response of VACNTs to uniaxial compression depends on various factors, including the material microstructure, density, height, rate of deformation, and the nature of the interaction between the CNTs and the compressing indenter [27]. For instance, vertical gradients in CNT morphology dictate the location of incipient buckling and distinct deformation mechanisms [18]. In addition, the horizontal gradient along the direction of the precursor flow varies bulk density and affects the peak stress and the modulus of the freestanding CNT arrays [28]. In order to tune the compressive strength of CNTs, various methods of mixing with epoxy composite [29], processing with CVD treatment [30], and coating with hard materials [31] have been investigated.
Beside the investigation of pristine CNTs, researchers have made a considerable effort to optimize the full potential of individual CNTs by application of conformal coatings of metal [32], ceramic [33] or even graphene [34]. Coated CNT arrays have received significant attention for potential use in electrical [35], optical [36], thermal [37], chemical [38], and mechanical [31] fields. Though the compressive performance of coated CNTs is expected to contribute significantly to the performance of these applications, relatively little is known about the collective mechanical behavior of coated CNT arrays and how their morphology may influence the mechanical response. Abadi et al. [39] investigated the mechanical properties of CNT forests coated with alumina using an atomic layer deposition (ALD) process. Poelma et al. [40] investigated the compressive strength of CNT arrays coated with SiC using the low-pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) process. In both publications, the material properties could be accurately tuned using different coating thicknesses and the compressive strength increased as a function of the coating thickness.
Recently the use of coated CNT as an electrical superconductor was presented. Kim et al. [41] fabricated superconducting fiber by sputter deposition of an NbN layer on free-standing CNT sheets, followed by post-twisting. Salvato et al. [42] proposed using Nb deposited on MWCNT film as a horizontal interconnect in superconducting nanoelectronics. The coating approach offers an interesting solution to fabricate fine pitch, high aspect ratio (AR), and superconductive interconnect by conformal superconductive coating to vertically aligned CNT pillars. The CNT bundle can provide sufficient toughness and high AR matrix, and meanwhile, the superconductive coatings do not only provide superconductivity, but can also improve the morphology and density of the CNT pillar, and therefore the mechanical properties of the pillar.
In this study, we first fabricated various diameter (30–150 µm) MWCNT pillars with a height of 120 µm by catalytic LPCVD. Then, the conformal coating of VA-MWCNT pillars was performed by ALD, with 20 nm thickness of niobium-titanium-nitride (NbTiN) as superconductor material. The morphology and structure of pristine and coated VA-MWCNT were investigated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), focused ion beam (FIB) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). To characterize the compressive response, flat-punch nano-indentation measurements on pristine and coated CNT pillars were performed. We analyzed the mechanical response by measuring the force-displacement curve and SEM inspection after compression. The proposed structure opens new perspectives on the possibility of using VA-MWCNT pillar as vertical interconnect for superconducting applications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. VA-MWCNT Pillar Growth with LPCVD

Growth of CNT on a silicon wafer needs three main ingredients: a barrier layer, catalyst nanoparticles, and a carbon source. The barrier layer prevents the diffusion of the catalyst into the silicon substrate and enables the transition metal catalyst film to break up into nanoparticles instead of forming an agglomeration. Regarding superconductor interconnect applications, an electrically conductive layer has to be used. Particularly, TiN is a diffusion barrier often used in semiconductor technology, which has the advantage of being electrically conductive at room temperature and can be superconductive at 4K. A transition metal catalyst which can be used on TiN to form CNTs is Fe, as was shown in previous work [43]. Fe nanoparticles are among the most used catalysts due to their high surface energy. However, it is important to point out that their size, structure, composition, type, and state of catalyst all influence CNT growth. In this study, LPCVD was employed to grow vertically aligned CNTs due to its scalability and the ability to grow long, high-density CNTs on controllable locations by patterning the catalyst.
Figure 1 represents the fabrication process of the coated VA-MWCNT pillars. We use a 100 mm p-type (100) silicon wafer as a substrate for CNT growth [44]. First, a 500 nm thick thermal silicon oxide layer is grown for electrical insulation of the TiN from the substrate. Next, a 10/50 nm layer of Ti/TiN is sputtered to enable the CNT growth from the catalyst particles. Then, a 5 nm thin layer of iron (Fe) catalyst is deposited by electron beam evaporation. The catalyst is patterned using optical lithography and a lift-off process. For the lift-off process, we spin coat a film of 1.5 µm thick negative photo-resist (AZ Nlof2020, Microchemicals GmbH) and use an NMP solvent at 70 °C for dissolving the resist during the lift-off. Next, MWCNT pillars are grown by LPCVD in a commercial deposition system (Black Magic Pro, Aixtron, Herzogenrath, Germany). The CNTs are grown at a temperature of 650 °C using a gas flow mixture of 700 sccm hydrogen over 50 sccm acetylene (H2/C2H2) at 80 mbar for 10 min.

2.2. NbTiN Coating on CNT Pillar with ALD

NbTiN is widely applied in superconducting electronic devices due to its merits of having a wide energy gap, high superconducting temperature, and mitigated requirement as well as compatibility with microfabrication processes [45]. For uniform deposition on high aspect ratio CNTs, atomic layer deposition (ALD) was used because it provides excellent homogeneity, high surface conformity, and low pinhole density along with nearly perfect thickness control.
NbTiN with a thickness of 20 nm was deposited on VA-CNT pillar with an Ultratech/CNT Fiji ALD system. Tris(diethylamido)(tert-butylimido) niobium (TBTDEN) and tetrakis(dimethylamino) titanium (TDMAT) were used as the niobium and titanium precursors and were maintained at 100 °C and 75 °C, respectively. The precursors were delivered to the system with a BoostTM system which introduces a charge of argon gas into the precursor cylinder before pulsing the precursor into the ALD reactor and substantially improving the transfer of low vapor pressure material from the cylinder to the substrate surface [46]. The ALD process consisted of repeated supercycles of precursor pulses and plasma exposure alternated with fixed purge periods. An individual Nb sequence consisted of a 500 ms boosted pulse of TBTDEN followed by a 5 s purge, repeated 3 times. An individual Ti sequence consisted of a 750 ms pulse of TDMAT followed by a 5 s purge. The plasma exposure times for the Nb and Ti sequences were 40 s and 20 s, respectively. For Ti cycles, the plasma gas contained 5 sccm N2, while an additional 80 sccm H2 was delivered during the Nb cycles. The plasma power was kept at 300 W for ALD runs. The layer thickness was controlled by the number of cycle/timing of the deposition process for 122 cycles, with a deposition rate of about 0.5 Å/min.

2.3. Compression Testing with Nano-Indentation

Nano-indentation can be used for testing the mechanical properties of microscale materials. The method employs high precision instrumentation to monitor the force and displacement of an indenter tip during compressive loading of a sample [47]. To evaluate the elastic properties as a continuous function of penetration depth, the continuous stiffness measurement (CSM) technique introduces relatively high-frequency loading and unloading cycles by imparting a small sinusoidal displacement at the indenter tip superimposed upon the larger steady tip displacement rate [48]. In such a way, stiffness and elastic properties may be evaluated at each data collection interval. The measurement of critical strain and average modulus is determined according to the classical three-region stress–strain curves, which have been reported widely in polymer and foam/cell material compression [49].
In this research, Nano-indentation was used to understand the effect of brittle coating on the mechanical performance of superconductive interconnects which is vital to the reliability of microsystem packages. The effect of coating on the compressive response of CNT pillars was characterized using an Agilent MTS nano-indenter XP G200. The Nano Indenter G200 is powered by electromagnetic transducers and utilizes the XP indentation head with a loading capability of 500 mN, delivering 500μm maximum indentation depth and 10 pm displacement resolution. Vertically oriented cylindrical pillars with an average height of about (120 ± 5) µm and diameters ranging from (30 ± 1) µm to (150 ± 2) µm were synthesized for cyclic compression tests. The uniaxial compression test of the CNT pillars was performed in air using a diamond punch tip of 150 μm diameter. The flat surface of the tip enables accurate detection of the CNT pillar surface and maintains a uniform contact area during compression. The pillars were compressed for 70% of strain and the compressive stress–strain response was recorded only for the loading process. The CSM parameters used were 2 nm amplitude, 45 Hz frequency, sensitive 100 N.m−1 surface detection and a strain rate of 0.01 s−1.

2.4. Pillar Characterization

The microstructure and morphology of the pristine and 20 nm-coated VACNT along the longitudinal direction were characterized by SEM (FEI XL50, Hillsboro, OR, USA). TEM and elemental mapping were measured using an FEI Titan. For the TEM analyses of all the synthesized samples, cross-section lamella preparation was prepared within a Scios DualBeam instrument, a combination of an SEM operating at 30 kV that produces enlarged images of the studied materials and an FIB system containing a Gallium(Ga) source that enables fast and precise milling of the materials [50]. The average CNT diameters and number of layers were obtained with over 10 individual multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) in different TEM images. The cross-section area and second moment of the area were deduced from the average outer/inner diameters of the nanotubes.
The chemical inertness of CNT requires some degree of defect for controlled deposition through ALD. The type, quantity, and distribution of such defects rules the deposition rate and defines the growth behavior. Raman spectroscopy was used to gather further information on the defect degree of the VACNTs. We conducted Raman spectroscopy measurements on three VACNT samples of each type at five different characterization positions along the longitudinal direction from the top to the bottom of each sample. We used the IG/ID ratio to correlate the structural purity of the graphitic materials to the disordered graphite via X-ray diffraction. Raman characterization was done using a Renishaw inVia system with a 514 nm wavelength Ar+ laser to determine the presence of defects on the CNTs and the effects of NbTiN deposition.

3. Results

3.1. Morphological and Structural Characterization

3.1.1. SEM and TEM Images

The surface morphology of the VACNTs pillars and their CNTs structure were examined by SEM and TEM. Figure 2 summarizes the as-grown CNT pillar with circular cross-sections and their nanostructures. Figure 2a shows SEM images that qualitatively illustrate the aligned distribution and morphology of the VACNTs along the longitudinal CNT direction. Figure 2b shows representative TEM images of MWCNTs extracted from the VA-MWCNT pillar. From the ensemble of these images, it was calculated that the nanotube average diameter, is 30 ± 4 nm and the tube density within the pillar is around 110 ± 10 tubes/µm2 with homogeneity, high surface conformity, and low pinhole density along with nearly perfect thickness control.
Figure 3 shows the morphology analysis of the MWCNT pillar after 20 nm NbTiN coating. Figure 3a shows the SEM images at different magnifications which reflect uniform deposition around the nanotube at top and bottom. The initial vertical orientation and the high surface area of the CNT array are retained, while in correspondence to the CNT–CNT junctions some localized aggregations are formed. The average coated CNT diameter is 60 ± 7 nm. Therefore, the average coating thicknesses deposited on the MWCNT surface is about 18 nm. To investigate the morphology and the coating infiltration depth within the VA-CNT arrays, we performed FIB preparation in Figure 3b with further analysis by TEM, as shown in Figure 3c. Due to changing the coating structure by using high energy ion milling, we also scratched the pillar with the needle to estimate the penetration of coating. The coating uniformity and the penetration depth was investigated along the radial and vertical direction. Cycle-to-cycle variations in both precursor dose and purging time were used to achieve a uniform monolayer on a CNT [51]. The coating thickness reduces roughly 2 nm for every 1 µm from the sidewall to the core. The penetration depth from the top is less than 5 µm. The low penetration depth and the uneven uniformity of the ALD coating within the intricate CNT foam-like morphology has been the object of several studies [52,53]. Figure 3d shows the emission profiles of carbon, titanium, nitrogen, and niobium. The Ti, N, and Nb elements are relatively homogeneously concentrated on top of the pillar, indicating a low diffusion of coating inside the dense pillar, which agrees well with the FIB results.

3.1.2. Raman Spectroscopy

Figure 4a shows the Raman spectrum intensity of the CNT pillar which was normalized to the G-peak intensity. The peaks near 1350 cm−1 and 1580 cm−1 in the first-order region correspond with the defects of any kind (D) and sp2 carbon (G) modes of the CNTs. The G-peak has convolved with a shoulder peak at 1620 cm−1, which is known as the D’-peak and is also associated with defects within the graphite hexagons originating from different points in the Brillouin zone. The intensity of the disordered graphite peak, with respect to the G-peak, refers to the number of defects present in the graphitic shells. The intensity ratio IG/ID of the peaks can be used to evaluate the quality of the CNTs, a higher ratio generally indicates better quality.
The data shows modulation of the graphite (G) and disordered graphite (D) peaks due to the broad NbTiN Raman features at lower wavenumbers, as is also visible in the spectrum of NbTiN on TiN in Figure 4b. For thicker NbTiN coatings the noise in the spectrum also increases, as the signal from the CNT is reduced. Deconvolution of the peaks using a least-square fitting procedure showed that the intensity ratio IG/ID is equal to 0.67 for uncoated tubes, revealing the low crystallinity degree of the CNT sample. Therefore, due to their intrinsic defectivity, no functionalization treatments were performed on the CNT scaffold before the coating procedures as defects can act as absorption sites. No relevant changes of the spectra of the CNTs occurred during the ALD deposition, suggesting that the CNTs were not damaged by the coating process, the apparent increase in IG/ID (which suggests an improvement of crystallinity) is attributed to inaccuracies in the fitting.
Figure 4b shows the Raman spectra from various points on the substrate of a 20 nm NbTiN layer. Deposition of NbTiN directly on bare and oxidized Si substrate shows a sharp feature at 520 cm−1 and a smaller feature around 970 cm−1 which originate from the crystalline Si substrate. Besides that several broad features are visible below 1000 cm−1 which likely originate from the NbTiN.

3.2. Mechanical Characterization

3.2.1. Stiffness of VA-MWCNT with Various Diameters

Indentation testing was performed on CNT pillars with the same height and various diameters. SEM images of pristine CNT pillars after 70% compression, as shown in Figure 5, reveal that the pillar failure mode is a type of localized periodic buckling. The deformation was similar to the deformation of uncoated CNT pillars in a prior study [40]; the buckling moves spatially along the pillar axis, which initiates at the base and propagates upwards throughout the entire bundle for increased compression depth. Large diameter pillars with an aspect ratio (AR) about 1 (D ~ 80–150 μm) show buckles at wavelength of about 2–5 μm and the smaller diameter pillars with AR of 0.5 (D ~ 40–60 μm) show buckling in the wavelength range of 10 to 15 μm. For needle-like pillars with AR of less than 0.25 (D ~ 20–30 μm), the bending occurs from the middle of the pillar. These typical buckling characteristics appear to be unique for CNT pillars. More importantly, the localized periodic buckling events are very reproducible and in excellent agreement with the in-situ CNT pillar compression observations from Hutchens et al. [54]. Smaller pillars tend to recover most of their original height upon release of a compressive load, allowing them to be repeatedly loaded.
The criterion for ductile behavior according to classical continuum mechanics cannot be directly satisfied for pristine VA-MWCNT arrays. Collective bending of the individual CNTs inside the discrete structure of the pristine array during compression causes interacts which stick to each other through van der Waals forces. During unloading, the CNTs remain stuck to each other thus preventing full elastic recovery. This localized bending and stiction-like deformation of the CNTs inside the pillar can be perceived as a permanent deformation of the pillar which can exhibit as high ductility.
The compressive load-displacement and stress–strain response of uncoated CNT pillars are shown in Figure 6a,b, respectively. Engineering stress and strain were calculated using the initial diameter and height of the pillar [55]. Despite their complex hierarchical microstructure, the general compressive behavior of VACNTs is akin to that of typical open-cell foams, as was first reported by Cao et al. [56]. In the spirit of the overall foam-like response, the stress–strain curves of VACNTs are characterized by three distinct regimes: (1) a short initial linear elastic section (<5%) up to the yield point followed by (2) a sloped oscillatory plateau (5–50%) with characteristic wavy features corresponding to buckle formation and (3) subsequent hardening to densification (>50%) characterized by rapid stress increase and finally locking. At the scale of its constituents, however, the response of VACNTs is quite different from that of traditional foams. In VACNT bundles, the post-elastic compressive strain is accommodated entirely via the formation of lateral folds or buckles usually close to the bottom of the bundle, while the remaining portion remains virtually unscathed. This is in contrast to traditional foams, where cell-edge bending and cell collapse are primarily responsible for the elastic-plastic foam response. In our VACNT samples, the formation of the first buckle at the bottom signals the transition from elastic to plateau regime. The inherent axial property gradient is responsible for the sequential nature of the buckling. Each buckle is of the order of 10–20 μm in size (depending on pillar diameter) so that several tens of buckles form during deformation. The post-elastic plateau region in the stress–strain curve also shows marked differences from that of an open-cell foam response, as evidenced by its nonzero positive slope and wave-like shape, where each undulation can be traced to subsequent buckling events. Unstable deformation and localization showing plateaus and serrations is highly stochastic, as the stress–strain curves are manifested by multiple strain bursts [57] and the size-dependent serrated behavior can be interpreted through combined gradient-stochastic models [58].

3.2.2. Stiffness of 20 nm Coated VA-MWCNT with Various Diameters

Figure 7 shows the deformation of the CNT pillar coated by the ALD method. For all pillar diameters, for the NbTiN that coats the pillars the brittle fails, and the MWCNTs exhibited formation of local periodic buckles starting from the bottom of the CNT pillar, as evidenced in Figure 8, where coated and pristine pillars are shown. It was concluded that NbTiN only penetrates inside the pillar for a few micrometers as already characterized. Therefore, the MWCNTs at the surfaces of the pillar are coated instead with internal MWCNTs in the pillar. This coating mode explains that CNTs buckle at the top of the buckled nanotubes and gradually develop upwards with applied loading. In this way, the buckling waves progressively develop upwards one by one with strain increase.
As shown in Figure 8, for coated and pristine CNTs as an example of the nanotube buckling process, the bottom of the nanotubes have already buckled and deformed, while the top of the nanotubes have started to buckle progressively. The plastic deformation of pristine CNTs is linearly dependent on strain and reaches up to 40% when the strain is 60%; while the coated CNTs have less than 30% plastic deformation in the same strain range. Theoretically, the larger bending stiffness of individual CNTs within the arrays could lead to better recovery effects and resilience. Localized damage of the coating material in foams causes softening in concentrated regions and leads to fluctuations on the stress plateau in its macroscopic behavior. Hybrid foam with high-ductility coating will have a failure mode similar to that exhibited by homogeneous metal foams. Otherwise, hybrid foams with low-ductility coatings will exhibit a more brittle failure and non-uniform damage regions; especially highly reinforced foams through thicker or stronger coatings.
Figure 9 reveals that the larger CNT pillars show the highest elastic modulus, suggesting that an area of coated CNT structure may play an important role in large strain compression when nanotubes start to contact each other and the behavior of CNTs changes from buckling to packing and folding. Plateau stress increases stepwise with some variation corresponding to the formation and propagation of localized strain bands [59]. It seems that the coating prevents the densification phase under compression. In comparison to pristine pillars, the compressive stress magnitude of larger coated CNTs is more due to the area of the coating. For smaller pillars (D < 60 µm) the stress magnitude of the coated pillar is less than a pristine pillar. Besides, the plateau regime in coated pillars increases with more stable steps in magnitude in comparison to pristine CNTs.

3.3. Modelling

Despite the difference in local response of the foam with CNT, it is possible to use the foam-like model to predict the behavior of CNT pillar with highly porous nature. In CNTs, the accommodation of strain during uniaxial compression is accomplished entirely through the formation of folds or buckles of small regions of the structure while the remaining portion remains nearly undeformed. This superposition of an overall foam-like response with localized strain accommodation is the key characteristic of CNT deformation [60].
Stress–strain experimental data were fitted to Equation (A8) in Appendix A using MATLAB and the build-in curve fitting toolbox. The extracted parameters for pristine MWCNT are presented in Table 1. Figure 10 shows good agreement between the curve fitting of the foam models with the experimental tests from pristine pillars with diameters ranging from 30 µm to 150 µm. Even for 30 µm pillars with no plateau region which is attributed to the different bending behaviors, we observed a good match. By increasing the diameter of the pillars, the Young’s modulus generally decreased which might be attributed to better alignment and a lower level of waviness along the length for smaller diameters. From a material point of view, it is interesting to specify the relaxation time which is given by the ratio of the damping coefficient C to the spring coefficient K of the Maxwell arm. Relaxation time is a characteristic time length that indicates the amount of viscous forces of the Maxwell arm with respect to elastic forces with unit of time. In Table 1, extracted relation times (T) revealed that pillars with a 100 µm diameter have the highest viscoelastic behavior, which drastically decreases for pillars ranging from 80 µm to 30 µm. Plateau regime represents the bulk of energy absorption in the material, since the area under this region of the stress–strain curve corresponds to the work done on the material. Regarding the plateau region, CNT pillars of 150 µm and 100 µm have similar positive values, revealing the fact that the stress is higher than the damper viscosity, which is not the case for CNT pillars with lower diameters. The intensification region is characterized by a strong non-linear behavior with an exponential function, which is determined by the parameters γ and n of the proposed model. The γ values are similar for all CNT pillars diameters, except for pillars with 30 µm diameter. This can be attributed to the fact that the intensification regime is not fully reached in this case.
The future directions of the present research must include experimentation of in situ and operando SEM nanoindentation observations to consider the complex deformation mechanisms involved in the VACNT pillar arrays. These can shed light on array deformation and the permanent deformation through damage mechanisms in order to obtain a better understanding of the transitions among the three compression regimes which can be incorporated in a future model.

4. Conclusions

This paper presented the nano-indentation test on a coated VA-MWCNT pillar for superconductor applications. The compressive stress–strain measurements of pristine VA-MWCNT showed that the three-regions of elasticity, plateau, and densification regime were nearly independent of pillar diameter. The curve fit modelling for foam-like behavior was used to predict the behavior of the CNT pillar. The coated pillars showed step-increase of the stress magnitude due to the brittle coating around the pillar which depended on the coverage area for various diameters. The aim was to assess the mechanical response and fracture mechanism of a brittle coated VA-MWCNT pillar as a vertical superconductor interconnect. The results showed that characterizing and understanding material behavior is important for designing new systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.G.; Data curation, L.S.; Formal analysis, S.V.; Investigation, A.M.G.; Methodology, A.M.G. and R.H.P.; Project administration, G.Q.Z.; Resources, S.V.; Software, L.S.; Supervision, G.Q.Z.; Validation, R.H.P.; Writing—original draft, A.M.G.; Writing—review and editing, R.H.P. and S.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Parts of this research have been funded within the framework of the 4TU. High-Tech Materials research program ‘New Horizons in designer materials’ (www.4tu.nl/htm).

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to express their gratitude to technical staff at the EKL cleanroom of TUDelft which provided support in the fabrication process of CNTs, Alessandro Bruno at the Kavli cleanroom of TUDelft for support on the ALD process, Majid Ahmadi from the HREM group of TUDelft for FIB and TEM images, and Erik Schlangen and Hongzhi Zhang in the department of structural engineering of TUDelft for nano-indentation tests.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

The foam model consists of three systems in parallel (Figure 6a). The first, referred to as the Maxwell arm, contains a spring (stiffness k) and dashpot (viscosity c) in series. The other two systems contain only springs (kP and kD). This model can be used to accurately predict the general shape of the compressive stress–strain curve. Stiffness coefficient k is equivalent to the foam Young’s modulus, damping coefficient C is equivalent to plateau stress, stiffness kP represents the slope of the plateau stress and stiffness coefficient kD is a function of strain.
To model this system, the following physical relations for parallel and series components must be realized [61]. The compressive stress (σ) and strain (ε) satisfy:
σ M =   σ K = σ C
ε M = ε C + ε K
σ = σ M + σ P + σ D
ε = ε M = ε P = ε D
σ and ε are related as:
σ K = k ε K
σ C = c   d ε C d t
σ P = k P ε P  
σ D = k D ε D = γ ( 1 − e ε D ) n ε D  
where k D is 2-parameters exponential function of strain.
k D ( ε ) = γ ( 1 − e ε ) n
Then, the time evolution is governed by:
d ε M d t =   d ( ε C +   ε K ) d t = 1 K d σ M d t + 1 C d σ C d t =   1 K d σ M d t + 1 C σ M
During our experiment strain rate was 0.01 s−1. Then, σ(t) satisfies:
σ M ( t ) = e − K t C ( e K t C − 1 ) C d ε M d t
Applying a substitution of time t by strain ε M , gives:
t =   ε M d ε C d t   and   d ε C d t = 0.01   s − 1
and substitution in Equation (A5) results in:
σ M ( ε ) =   e − K ε M C d ε C d t ( e K ε M C d ε C d t − 1 ) C 100 = e − K ε C / 100 ( e K ε C / 100 − 1 ) C 100
Then the final expression of σ as a function of ε is expressed in terms of the parameters K , k P ,   C ,   γ   and n :
σ ( ε ) =   e − K ε C / 100 ( e K ε C / 100 − 1 ) C 100 +   ε ( k P +   γ ( 1 − e ε ) n )
In summary, we could fit these curves with the experimental data and extract the value of each parameter [1].

References

  1. Harik, V. Mechanics of Carbon Nanotubes: Fundamentals, Modelling and Safety; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 135–164. [Google Scholar]
  2. Caruntu, D.I.; Luo, L. Frequency response of primary resonance of electrostatically actuated CNT cantilevers. Nonlinear Dyn. 2014, 78, 1827–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, L.; Weng, M.; Zhou, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, L.; Li, J.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, W.; Liu, C.; Fan, S.; et al. Large-deformation curling actuators based on carbon nanotube composite: Advanced-structure design and biomimetic application. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 12189–12196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dong Kyun, S.; Tae June, K.; Dae Weon, K.; Yong Hyup, K. Twistable and bendable actuator: A CNT/polymer sandwich structure driven by thermal gradient. Nanotechnology 2012, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hüttel, A.K.; Steele, G.A.; Witkamp, B.; Poot, M.; Kouwenhoven, L.P.; Van Der Zant, H.S.J. Carbon nanotubes as ultrahigh quality factor mechanical resonators. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 2547–2552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Li, Y.; Shang, Y.; He, X.; Peng, Q.; Du, S.; Shi, E.; Wu, S.; Li, Z.; Li, P.; Cao, A.; et al. Overtwisted, resolvable carbon nanotube yarn entanglement as strain sensors and rotational actuators. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 8128–8135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Farrokhabadi, A.; Koochi, A.; Abadyan, M. Modeling the instability of CNT tweezers using a continuum model. Microsyst. Technol. 2013, 20, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kuche, K.; Maheshwari, R.; Tambe, V.; Jogi, H.; Raval, N.; Pichika, M.R.; Tekade, R.K.; Mak, K.-K. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) based advanced dermal therapeutics: Current trends and future potential. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 8911–8937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vollebregt, S.; Ishihara, R. The direct growth of carbon nanotubes as vertical interconnects in 3D integrated circuits. Carbon 2016, 96, 332–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wei, B.Q.; Vajtai, R.; Ajayan, P.M. Reliability and current carrying capacity of carbon nanotubes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 79, 1172–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vollebregt, S.; Ishihara, R. Carbon nanotubes as vertical interconnects for 3D integrated circuits. In Carbon Nanotubes for Interconnects; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 195–213. [Google Scholar]
  12. Baillargeat, D.; Tay, E.B.K.; Tay, B.K. Carbon nanotubes as microbumps for 3D integration. In Carbon Nanotubes for Interconnects; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 215–245. [Google Scholar]
  13. Vahidpour, M.; O’Brien, W.; Whyland, J.T.; Angeles, J.; Marshall, J.; Scarabelli, D.; Crossman, G.; Yadav, K.; Mohan, Y.; Bui, C.; et al. Superconducting through-silicon vias for quantum integrated circuits. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1708.02226. [Google Scholar]
  14. Alfaro-Barrantes, J.A.; Mastrangeli, M.; Thoen, D.J.; Visser, S.; Bueno, J.; Baselmans, J.J.A.; Sarro, P.M. Superconducting high-aspect ratio through-silicon vias with DC-sputtered Al for quantum 3D integration. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2020, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rosenberg, D.; Kim, D.; Das, R.; Yost, D.; Gustavsson, S.; Hover, D.; Krantz, P.; Melville, A.; Racz, L.; Samach, G.O.; et al. 3D integrated superconducting qubits. npj Quantum Inf. 2017, 3, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jensen, K.; Mickelson, W.; Kis, A.; Zettl, A. Buckling and kinking force measurements on individual multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 76, 195436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yap, H.W.; Lakes, R.S.; Carpick, R.W. Mechanical instabilities of individual multiwalled carbon nanotubes under cyclic axial compression. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 1149–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abadi, P.P.S.S.; Hutchens, S.B.; Greer, J.R.; Cola, B.A.; Graham, S. Effects of morphology on the micro-compression response of carbon nanotube forests. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 3373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Volkov, A.N.; Zhigilei, L.V. Structural stability of carbon nanotube films: The role of bending buckling. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 6187–6195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Zbib, A.A.; Mesarovic, S.; Lilleodden, E.T.; McClain, D.; Jiao, J.; Bahr, D.F. The coordinated buckling of carbon nanotube turfs under uniform compression. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 175704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, Y.; Kang, J.; Choi, J.-B.; Nam, J.-D.; Suhr, J. Determination of material constants of vertically aligned carbon nanotube structures in compressions. Nanotechnology 2015, 26, 245701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Raney, J.; Fraternali, F.; Daraio, C. Rate-independent dissipation and loading direction effects in compressed carbon nanotube arrays. Nanotechnology 2013, 24, 255707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Brown, J.; Hajilounezhad, T.; Dee, N.T.; Kim, S.; Hart, A.J.; Maschmann, M.R. Delamination mechanics of carbon nanotube micropillars. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 35221–35227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Abdalla, S.; Al-Marzouki, F.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Abdel-Daiem, A. Different technical applications of carbon nanotubes. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2015, 10, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Fan, K.; Li, J.; Li, L.; Li, J.; Hu, J. Functionalization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes and its application in preparing the 3D graphene/carbon nanotubes hybrid architectures. Full. Nanotub. Carbon Nanostruct. 2018, 26, 226–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wittmaack, B.K.; Banna, A.H.; Volkov, A.N.; Zhigilei, L.V. Mesoscopic modeling of structural self-organization of carbon nanotubes into vertically aligned networks of nanotube bundles. Carbon 2018, 130, 69–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wittmaack, B.K.; Volkov, A.N.; Zhigilei, L.V. Mesoscopic modeling of the uniaxial compression and recovery of vertically aligned carbon nanotube forests. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2018, 166, 66–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Misra, A.; Raney, J.; Craig, A.E.; Daraio, C. Effect of density variation and non-covalent functionalization on the compressive behavior of carbon nanotube arrays. Nanotechnology 2011, 22, 425705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dassios, K.; Musso, S.; Galiotis, C. Compressive behavior of MWCNT/epoxy composite mats. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2012, 72, 1027–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bradford, P.D.; Wang, X.; Zhao, H.; Zhu, Y. Tuning the compressive mechanical properties of carbon nanotube foam. Carbon 2011, 49, 2834–2841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Poelma, R.H.; Morana, B.; Vollebregt, S.; Schlangen, E.; Van Zeijl, H.W.; Fan, X.; Zhang, G. Tailoring the mechanical properties of high-aspect-ratio carbon nanotube arrays using amorphous silicon carbide coatings. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 5737–5744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Barberio, M.; Stranges, F.; Xu, F. Coating geometry of Ag, Ti, Co, Ni, and Al nanoparticles on carbon nanotubes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 334, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhao, H.; Jacob, C.; Stone, H.A.; Hart, A.J. Liquid imbibition in ceramic-coated carbon nanotube films. Langmuir 2016, 32, 12686–12692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, X.; Jin, J.; Yan, P.; Xu, J.; Zhang, R.; Wu, C. Structure and electrochemical performance of graphene/porous carbon coated carbon nanotube composite for supercapacitors. Mater. Lett. 2015, 160, 190–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Daoush, W.M.; Lim, B.K.; Mo, C.B.; Nam, D.H.; Hong, S.H. Electrical and mechanical properties of carbon nanotube reinforced copper nanocomposites fabricated by electroless deposition process. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2009, 513, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Allsop, T.; Arif, R.; Neal, R.; Kalli, K.; Kundrát, V.; Rozhin, A.; Culverhouse, P.; Webb, D. Photonic gas sensors exploiting directly the optical properties of hybrid carbon nanotube localized surface plasmon structures. Light. Sci. Appl. 2016, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Silvestri, C.; Riccio, M.; Poelma, R.H.; Jović, A.; Morana, B.; Vollebregt, S.; Irace, A.; Zhang, G.Q.; Sarro, P. Effects of Conformal nanoscale coatings on thermal performance of vertically aligned carbon nanotubes. Small 2018, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jin, Z.-H.; Liu, Y.-L.; Chen, J.-J.; Cai, S.-L.; Xu, J.-Q.; Huang, W.-H. Conductive polymer-coated carbon nanotubes to construct stretchable and transparent electrochemical sensors. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 2032–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Abadi, P.P.S.S.; Matthew, R.M.; Jeffery, W.B.; Samuel, G.; Baratunde, A.C. Deformation response of conformally coated carbon nanotube forests. Nanotechnology 2013, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Poelma, R.H.; Fan, X.; Hu, Z.-Y.; Van Tendeloo, G.; Van Zeijl, H.W.; Zhang, G. Effects of nanostructure and coating on the mechanics of carbon nanotube arrays. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 1233–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kim, J.-G.; Kang, H.; Lee, Y.; Park, J.; Kim, J.; Truong, T.K.; Kim, E.S.; Yoon, D.H.; Lee, Y.H.; Suh, D.; et al. Carbon-nanotube-templated, sputter-deposited, flexible superconducting NbN nanowire yarns. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Salvato, M.; Cirillo, C.; Fittipaldi, R.; Prischepa, S.L.; Vecchione, A.; De Nicola, F.; Castrucci, P.; De Crescenzi, M.; Scarselli, M.; Attanasio, C.; et al. Transport properties in aggregates of Nb nanowires templated by carbon nanotube films. Carbon 2016, 105, 544–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Vollebregt, S.; Ishihara, R.; Derakhshandeh, J.; Van Der Cingel, J.; Schellevis, H.; Beenakker, C. Integrating low temperature aligned carbon nanotubes as vertical interconnects in Si technology. In Proceedings of the 2011 11th IEEE International Conference on Nanotechnology, Portland, OR, USA, 15–18 August 2011; pp. 985–990. [Google Scholar]
  44. Fiorentino, G.; Vollebregt, S.; Ishihara, R.; Sarro, P.M. Multilayer conformal coating of highly dense multi-walled carbon nanotubes bundles. In Proceedings of the 2012 12th IEEE International Conference on Nanotechnology (IEEE-NANO), Birmingham, UK, 20–23 August 2012; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  45. Dorenbos, S.N.; Reiger, E.M.; Perinetti, U.; Zwiller, V.; Zijlstra, T.; Klapwijk, T.M. Low noise superconducting single photon detectors on silicon. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 93, 131101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Yemane, Y.T.; Sowa, M.J.; Zhang, J.; Ju, L.; Deguns, E.W.; Strandwitz, N.C.; Prinz, F.B.; Provine, J. Superconducting niobium titanium nitride thin films deposited by plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 2017, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hay, J. Introduction to instrumented indentation testing. Exp. Tech. 2009, 33, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Oliver, W.C.; Pharr, G.M. Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: Advances in understanding and refinements to methodology. J. Mater. Res. 2004, 19, 3–20. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ashby, M.F.; Jones, D.R.H. Chapter 25—Mechanical properties of polymers. In Engineering Materials 2, 4th ed.; Ashby, M.F., Jones, D.R.H., Eds.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Boston, MA, USA, 2013; pp. 419–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ke, X.; Bals, S.; Negreira, A.R.; Hantschel, T.; Bender, H.; Van Tendeloo, G. TEM sample preparation by FIB for carbon nanotube interconnects. Ultramicroscopy 2009, 109, 1353–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fiorentino, G.; Vollebregt, S.; Tichelaar, F.D.; Ishihara, R.; Sarro, P. Impact of the atomic layer deposition precursors diffusion on solid-state carbon nanotube based supercapacitors performances. Nanotechnology 2015, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yazdani, N.; Chawla, V.; Edwards, E.; Wood, V.; Park, H.G.; Utke, I. Modeling and optimization of atomic layer deposition processes on vertically aligned carbon nanotubes. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2014, 5, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Acauan, L.H.; Dias, A.C.; Pereira, M.B.; Horowitz, F.; Bergmann, C.P. Influence of different defects in vertically aligned carbon nanotubes on TiO2 nanoparticle formation through atomic layer deposition. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 16444–16450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Maschmann, M.R.; Zhang, Q.; Wheeler, R.; Du, F.; Dai, L.; Baur, J. In situ SEM observation of column-like and foam-like CNT array nanoindentation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 648–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hutchens, S.B.; Hall, L.J.; Greer, J.R. In situ mechanical testing reveals periodic buckle nucleation and propagation in carbon nanotube bundles. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20, 2338–2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Cao, A.; Dickrell, P.L.; Sawyer, W.G.; Ghasemi-Nejhad, M.N.; Ajayan, P. Super-compressible foamlike carbon nanotube films. Science 2005, 310, 1307–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Konstantinidis, A.; Aifantis, K.E.; De Hosson, J.T.M. Capturing the stochastic mechanical behavior of micro and nanopillars. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2014, 597, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Aifantis, E.C. Chapter one—Internal Length Gradient (ILG) material mechanics across scales and disciplines. In Advances in Applied Mechanics; Bordas, S.P.A., Balint, D.S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; Volume 49, pp. 1–110. [Google Scholar]
  59. Aifantis, K.E.; Konstantinidis, A.; Forest, S. Modeling strain localization bands in metal foams. J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 2010, 7, 360–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hutchens, S.B.; Pathak, S. Vertically aligned carbon nanotubes, collective mechanical behavior. In Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology; Bhushan, B., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 2809–2818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Goga, V. New phenomenological model for solid foams. In Computational Modelling and Advanced Simulations; Murín, J., Kompiš, V., Kutiš, V., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 67–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 10 01189 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic of microfabrication process; (1) SiO2 deposited and Ti/TiN (10/50 nm) sputtered on a silicon wafer as a barrier layer, (2) photoresist (1.4 µm) coated and baked, (3) wafer aligned and exposed under the photomask, (4) pattern developed, (5) Fe nanoparticle (5 nm thickness) evaporated as a catalyst, followed by, (6) a lift-off process to define the CNT growth regions, (7) Vertically aligned multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) bundles (120 µm) grown in an AIXTRON Black Magic chemical vapor deposition reactor, (8) Finally, NbTiN (20 nm) deposited by atomic layer deposition (ALD) on the structure.
Figure 1. Schematic of microfabrication process; (1) SiO2 deposited and Ti/TiN (10/50 nm) sputtered on a silicon wafer as a barrier layer, (2) photoresist (1.4 µm) coated and baked, (3) wafer aligned and exposed under the photomask, (4) pattern developed, (5) Fe nanoparticle (5 nm thickness) evaporated as a catalyst, followed by, (6) a lift-off process to define the CNT growth regions, (7) Vertically aligned multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) bundles (120 µm) grown in an AIXTRON Black Magic chemical vapor deposition reactor, (8) Finally, NbTiN (20 nm) deposited by atomic layer deposition (ALD) on the structure.
Nanomaterials 10 01189 g001
Nanomaterials 10 01189 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of pristine vertically aligned (VA)-MWCNT pillar and (b) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of pristine MWCNT, at different magnifications.
Figure 2. (a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of pristine vertically aligned (VA)-MWCNT pillar and (b) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of pristine MWCNT, at different magnifications.
Nanomaterials 10 01189 g002
Nanomaterials 10 01189 g003 550
Figure 3. VA-MWCNT pillar with 20 nm NbTiN coated. (a) SEM images of coated VA-MWCNT pillar; (b) SEM image of FIB on pillar; (c) STEM and TEM images of focused ion beam (FIB) prepared lamella; (d) energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) mapping of the lamella.
Figure 3. VA-MWCNT pillar with 20 nm NbTiN coated. (a) SEM images of coated VA-MWCNT pillar; (b) SEM image of FIB on pillar; (c) STEM and TEM images of focused ion beam (FIB) prepared lamella; (d) energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) mapping of the lamella.
Nanomaterials 10 01189 g003
Nanomaterials 10 01189 g004 550
Figure 4. Normalized Raman spectra of (a) coated MWCNT with different thicknesses of NbTiN and (b) 20 nm NbTiN on various points of the substrate.
Figure 4. Normalized Raman spectra of (a) coated MWCNT with different thicknesses of NbTiN and (b) 20 nm NbTiN on various points of the substrate.
Nanomaterials 10 01189 g004
Nanomaterials 10 01189 g005 550
Figure 5. SEM images of pristine CNT pillars after 70% compressed strain of various diameters.
Figure 5. SEM images of pristine CNT pillars after 70% compressed strain of various diameters.
Nanomaterials 10 01189 g005
Nanomaterials 10 01189 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Compression force-displacement and (b) stress–strain curves for pristine CNT pillars of various diameters.
Figure 6. (a) Compression force-displacement and (b) stress–strain curves for pristine CNT pillars of various diameters.
Nanomaterials 10 01189 g006
Nanomaterials 10 01189 g007 550
Figure 7. SEM images of 20 nm NbTiN coated CNT pillars after 70% compressed strain of various diameters.
Figure 7. SEM images of 20 nm NbTiN coated CNT pillars after 70% compressed strain of various diameters.
Nanomaterials 10 01189 g007
Nanomaterials 10 01189 g008 550
Figure 8. SEM images of compressed coated and pristine CNT pillars with 100 μm diameters after 40 μm compression.
Figure 8. SEM images of compressed coated and pristine CNT pillars with 100 μm diameters after 40 μm compression.
Nanomaterials 10 01189 g008
Nanomaterials 10 01189 g009 550
Figure 9. (a) Compression force-displacement and (b) stress–strain curves for 20 nm NbTiN coated CNT in various diameters.
Figure 9. (a) Compression force-displacement and (b) stress–strain curves for 20 nm NbTiN coated CNT in various diameters.
Nanomaterials 10 01189 g009
Nanomaterials 10 01189 g010a 550Nanomaterials 10 01189 g010b 550
Figure 10. Measured and fitting curves for stress–strain curves for pristine CNT pillars with diameters ranging from 150 µm to 30 µm.
Figure 10. Measured and fitting curves for stress–strain curves for pristine CNT pillars with diameters ranging from 150 µm to 30 µm.
Nanomaterials 10 01189 g010aNanomaterials 10 01189 g010b
Table
Table 1. Model parameters for foam-like behavior of pristine vertically-aligned multi-walled carbon nanotube (VA-MWCNT) pillars.
Table 1. Model parameters for foam-like behavior of pristine vertically-aligned multi-walled carbon nanotube (VA-MWCNT) pillars.
Pillar Diameter [µm]K [MPa]C [MPa·Sec]T = C/K [Sec]kP [MPa]γ [MPa]n
15043 ± 0.5215 ± 55.0 ± 0.21.8 ± 0.113.1 ± 0.18
10030 ± 1226 ± 127.5 ± 0.62.2 ± 0.216.0 ± 0.110
80108 ± 3270 ± 32.5 ± 0.1−1.30 ± 0.0717.5 ± 0.56
60307 ± 18209 ± 30.70 ± 0.05−1.10 ± 0.0616.5 ± 0.16
50270 ± 11185 ± 60.70 ± 0.05−1.90 ± 0.0614.0 ± 0.66
30344 ± 50212 ± 40.6 ± 0.1−3.00 ± 0.154.4 ± 0.24

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mirza Gheitaghy, A.; Poelma, R.H.; Sacco, L.; Vollebregt, S.; Zhang, G.Q. Vertically-Aligned Multi-Walled Carbon Nano Tube Pillars with Various Diameters under Compression: Pristine and NbTiN Coated. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1189. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10061189

AMA Style

Mirza Gheitaghy A, Poelma RH, Sacco L, Vollebregt S, Zhang GQ. Vertically-Aligned Multi-Walled Carbon Nano Tube Pillars with Various Diameters under Compression: Pristine and NbTiN Coated. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(6):1189. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10061189

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mirza Gheitaghy, Amir, René H. Poelma, Leandro Sacco, Sten Vollebregt, and Guo Qi Zhang. 2020. "Vertically-Aligned Multi-Walled Carbon Nano Tube Pillars with Various Diameters under Compression: Pristine and NbTiN Coated" Nanomaterials 10, no. 6: 1189. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10061189

APA Style

Mirza Gheitaghy, A., Poelma, R. H., Sacco, L., Vollebregt, S., & Zhang, G. Q. (2020). Vertically-Aligned Multi-Walled Carbon Nano Tube Pillars with Various Diameters under Compression: Pristine and NbTiN Coated. Nanomaterials, 10(6), 1189. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10061189

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop