Next Article in Journal
The Role of Polymeric Coatings for a Safe-by-Design Development of Biomedical Gold Nanoparticles Assessed in Zebrafish Embryo
Next Article in Special Issue
pH-Sensitive Chitosan Nanoparticles for Salivary Protein Delivery
Previous Article in Journal
Probing the Surface Chemistry of Nanoporous Gold via Electrochemical Characterization and Atom Probe Tomography
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effect of Morphologically Controlled Hematite Nanoparticles on the Properties of Fly Ash Blended Cement

Nanomaterials 2021, 11(4), 1003; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11041003
by Pantharee Kongsat 1,2, Sakprayut Sinthupinyo 3, Edgar A. O’Rear 4 and Thirawudh Pongprayoon 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(4), 1003; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11041003
Submission received: 18 March 2021 / Revised: 9 April 2021 / Accepted: 9 April 2021 / Published: 14 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synthesis and Application of Nanoparticles in Novel Composites)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I suggest that the paper is clearly presented and the methods and results are well described.    

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you for your consideration on our manuscript. As your suggestion in some points, we have improved and answered as attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Article titled: Effect of morphologically controlled hematite nanoparticles on the properties of fly ash blended cement, presents very interesting investigation. In my opinio it can be publshed after some fullfilments and improvements.

In the article authors synthesized nanoparticles of hematite, hovewer there is no explanation target of this activities. I mean economic aspects? There is lack of information about even appoximately estimation of costs synthesis especially that cost of proces with usage of reagents such as CTAB are high.

Second isse why authors conisde maxiumum period of time for ageing only 90 days. Most of investigation presents in literature carreid out some test also after one year. In such case authors should mention in conclusion chapter about further plans.

And Conclusion constitued rather summary rather than main conslusion, therefore it sould be improved. 

Author Response

Thank you for your consideration on our manuscript. As your suggestion in some points, we have improved and answered as attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Some of the Figures need improvement, see comments in the pdf

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you for your consideration on our manuscript. As your suggestion in some points, we have improved and answered as attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop