Next Article in Journal
Properties and Mechanism of PEALD-In2O3 Thin Films Prepared by Different Precursor Reaction Energy
Next Article in Special Issue
Comprehensive Thermal Analysis of Diamond in a High-Power Raman Cavity Based on FVM-FEM Coupled Method
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis of Polystyrene-Based Cationic Nanomaterials with Pro-Oxidant Cytotoxic Activity on Etoposide-Resistant Neuroblastoma Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Various Allotropes of Diamond Nanoparticles Generated in the Gas Phase during Hot Filament Chemical Vapor Deposition
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Monitoring Dark-State Dynamics of a Single Nitrogen-Vacancy Center in Nanodiamond by Auto-Correlation Spectroscopy: Photonionization and Recharging

Nanomaterials 2021, 11(4), 979; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11040979
by Mengdi Zhang 1,2, Bai-Yan Li 1,* and Jing Liu 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(4), 979; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11040979
Submission received: 1 March 2021 / Revised: 25 March 2021 / Accepted: 31 March 2021 / Published: 10 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanodiamonds: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have studied  the  photon-induced  charge  conversion  dynamics  of  a  single  (NV)  center  in  nanodiamond  between  two  charge  states,  using the auto-correlation function.

The subject is interesting; however, I have some remarks that should be considered in the revised version:    

  • The section I introduces the NV centers but I feel it is enough theory and motivations.

The reference: Scientific Reports 10, 1-11 (2020) could be helpful as well the references therein.

  • The authors used the classical definition of the autocorrelation function, they should justify why they did not consider the autocorrelation with ordered operators. The reference: Laser Physics Letters 2, 253-257 (2005) and references therein can be helpful.
  • I feel that the interpretation of the experimental results is incomplete and needs more details.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

I find the paper quite interesting and suggest that it can be published after a few corrections.

  1. Abstract should be completed with the information of the measurements accomplished in these studies.
  2. Introduction contains Fig.1, which (according to the explanation from the paper) presents the data from the literature. [17, 23, 24]. Hence, the captions under the Figure should be completed with the phrase “with the publisher permit…”, and so on.
  3. Line 227. The sentence “Our work…” provides nothing new and valuable, so it can be removed from the paper.
  4. Line 246. Ref.[49] is not on the list of references.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The revised version is Ok. I accept it.

Back to TopTop