Next Article in Journal
Optical Constants and Structural Properties of Epitaxial MoS2 Monolayers
Previous Article in Journal
Funneling Spontaneous Emission into Waveguides via Epsilon-Near-Zero Metamaterials
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/nano11061412
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Theoretical Investigation of the Prospect to Tailor ZnO Electronic Properties with VP Thin Films

by
Anastasiia S. Kholtobina
1,
Evgenia A. Kovaleva
2,*,
Julia Melchakova
3,
Sergey G. Ovchinnikov
2 and
Alexander A. Kuzubov
2,†
1
Materials Science and Engineering, Industrial Engineering & Management School, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Brinellvågen 23, 11428 Stockholm, Sweden
2
Kirensky Institute of Physics, Federal Research Center KSC Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Akademgorodok 50, bld. 38, 660036 Krasnoyarsk, Russia
3
Faculty of Physics, Tomsk State University, 36 Lenin Ave, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Deceased 31 September 2016.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(6), 1412; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061412
Submission received: 30 April 2021 / Revised: 23 May 2021 / Accepted: 24 May 2021 / Published: 27 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Nanocomposite Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The atomic and electronic structure of vanadium phosphide one- to four-atomic-layer thin films and their composites with zinc oxide substrate are modelled by means of quantum chemistry. Favorable vanadium phosphide to ZnO orientation is defined and found to remain the same for all the structures under consideration. The electronic structure of the composites is analyzed in detail. The features of the charge and spin density distribution are discussed.

1. Introduction

Zinc oxide has been of particular interest to the researchers during the last several decades due to its chemical stability and non-toxicity along with the low cost. This material is promising for a number of potential applications such as photoelectric elements [1,2,3,4,5,6,7], light-emitting diodes (LEDs) [8,9,10,11,12], gas sensors [13,14,15], biosensors [16], photodetectors [17,18] and photocatalytic devices [19,20].
Electronic properties of ZnO are strongly affected by the synthesis conditions and method. This fact is associated with the point defects (oxygen/zinc vacancy and oxygen/zinc interstitials) acting as dopants and influencing physical and chemical characteristics of material [21,22,23,24]. ZnO doping enhances its physical properties—namely, electric conductivity [25], and transparency [26]—and decreases the electron work function [27]. Ferromagnetic properties [28,29] may also occur in doped ZnO while the pristine material is non-magnetic.
n-doping of ZnO is usually reached by XIII group elements (i.e., B [30], Al [31,32], Ga [33,34], In [35]) as well as transition metals such as Ti [36]. On the other hand, XV group elements (N [37,38], P [39,40] and Sb [41]) are promising p-type dopants substituting oxygen atoms in ZnO structure. ZnO doped by transition metal atoms arouses great interest due to the opportunity to obtain diluted magnetic semiconductors (DMS) for new device applications.
Besides the doping of ZnO with different elements of periodic table, the formation of thin films-based composites is another popular way to tune its properties. For instance, synthesis and enhanced photocatalytic properties have been recently reported for ZnO-based composites with graphene [42,43,44,45]. Another way to improve ZnO photocatalytic activity is using MXenes, a promising family of materials defined by Mn+1XnTx composition where M is an early transition metal, X is carbon and/or nitrogen atom and T represents the surface-terminating functional groups [46,47,48]. Thus, investigations of zinc oxide-based metamaterials obtained by its doping as well as growing thin films of transition metals compounds on ZnO substrate are a promising direction of modern materials science.
Transition metal phosphides (TMP), one more promising family of two-dimensional transition metal compounds, have gained significant research interest due to their unique properties and catalytic activity in hydrogen evolution reaction [49,50,51,52,53]. Some of them have even been predicted to be comparable with Pt (111) surface [54]. Extensive theoretical studies of M2P monolayers have shown them as promising candidates for catalysis and electrode materials [55,56,57]. The most recent study of tetragonal VP monolayer reveals its half-metallicity and interesting optical properties [58].
The present paper aims to show how ZnO electronic structure changes when forming nanoscale composites with VP thin films. First, thin films of vanadium phosphide with various thickness and composition are characterized by means of density functional theory. After that, ZnO/VP stacking, electronic and magnetic properties are discussed.

2. Computational Methods

All quantum chemical calculations were performed within the framework of density functional theory using the plane wave basis set and projector-augmented wave method [59,60], as implemented in Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package [61,62,63,64]. GGA-PBE spin-polarized exchange-correlation functional [65] and Grimme correction [66] for van der Waals interactions were used for electronic and structural optimization. The residual forces acting on atoms being less than 10−3 eV/Å were used as stopping criteria for cell vectors and geometry optimization. Monkhorst-Pack k-point first Brilloin zone sampling [67] was used with k-point mesh containing 12 × 12 × 6 points along three translation vectors for bulk ZnO and VP calculations. When calculating the slabs and interfaces, the vacuum interval of 15 Å was used to guarantee the absence of interactions between slab images in periodic boundary conditions. For these structures, 12 × 12 × 1 k-point mesh was used.
The surface energy for all slabs was estimated as:
E s u r f = ( E s c − n ⋅ E u c ) / ( 2 ⋅ S )
where E s u r f , E s c , E u c , n, S correspond to the surface energy, total energy of the surface supercell, total energy of ZnO unit cell, number of unit cells in the supercell, and the area of ZnO slab unit cell, respectively.
The most favorable orientation of VP slab with respect to ZnO surface was determined by comparing stacking energies of each configuration estimated using the equation:
Estack = Ecomp − EZnO − EVP
where Ecomp, EZnO, EVP correspond to the total energies of composite, pure ZnO slab and pure VP slab, respectively.

3. Results and Discussions

At the first step, the correspondence of the ZnO (0001) surface and vanadium phosphide hexagonal lattices was proved. The zinc oxide hexagonal unit cell belongs to the space group P63mc with lattice parameters a = b = 3.25, c = 5.21 Å [68] while the VP hexagonal unit cell belongs to the space group P63/mmc with lattice parameters a = b = 3.180, c = 6.220 Å [69]. A set of free-standing ZnO (0001) slabs with the number of atomic layers varying from 7 to 12 were modelled. It was found that the values of Esurf are close to each other and lie in the range of 1.854 to 1.883 J/m2. Thus, the one with the smallest number of atoms was used as the surface unit cell for further calculations. Next, VP slabs cut from the bulk crystal with the number of layers decreasing from four to one were modelled.
Lattice parameter a as well as the corresponding magnetic moments for VP are presented in Table 1. Structural parameters of bulk VP are in good agreement with experimental data [69]. The structure stoichiometries correspond to the number of each element’s atomic layers. Thin films of two or more layers are close to the original bulk structure while monolayers demonstrate fluctuations of a parameter which can be explained in terms of structural instability. The stoichiometric compositions of VP thin films are characterised by larger magnetic moments on vanadium atoms caused by the V dangling bonds while their non-stoichiometric counterparts have magnetic moments close to zero (Figure 1 illustrates atomic structure for stoichiometric and non-stoichiometric bilayer of VP). In this work, we mainly focus on stoichiometric structures as V-terminated surfaces possessing larger magnetic moments. Magnetic catalysts are considered to be environmentally friendly as they can be easily and completely separated from reactants using an external magnet without any loss, unlike other heterogeneous catalysts requiring filtration, centrifugation and other techniques that might be quite sophisticated [70]. It is also known that not only charge transfer but also spin transfer may occur when the molecule is adsorbed on magnetic surface, enhancing its catalytic properties [71] and expanding the area of potential applications in spintronic devices [72]. Non-stoichiometric ones are presented both for the reference and as an intermediate step of thin films formation.
The manifold of composite structures considered included different VP film orientations with respect to ZnO (see Figure 2 for the notations: A_top_B corresponds to the atom A of VP being on top of the atom B of ZnO; A_hex represents hexagonal hollow site below the atom A of VP).
The [P_top_Zn:V_hex] configuration of VP/ZnO composite was found to have the lowest stacking energy for both V4P4/ZnO and VP monolayer/ZnO structures (−1.273 eV and −1.167 eV, respectively, see Table 2). This configuration is also characterized by the largest values of magnetic moments, and the VP monolayer possesses the largest among all (2.285 µB). According to the common trend in stacking energies for one- and four-layer VP films, only [P_top_Zn:V_hex] configuration was constructed for two- and three-layer ones.
Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6 illustrate the total (TDOS) and partial (PDOS) densities of states for the VP/ZnO composites in favorable configuration. As can be clearly seen from A and B parts of Figure 3 and Figure 4, the ZnO slab mostly contributes to the states in the valence zone while the conduction zone is formed predominately by VP film. Analysis of C and D parts of the same figures shows how the slabs affect each other in comparison with isolated ZnO and VP thin films.
Composite formation leads to the shifting and broadening of DOS peaks, which is more prominent for the VP monolayer in VP/ZnO composite while VP thickness up to three layers leads to the change mostly in the ZnO valence zone (see Figure 4). However, the levels of zinc oxide thin film above the Fermi level are much less affected (see insets in Figure 3C and Figure 4C).
Figure 5 demonstrates element-resolved PDOS for V4P4/ZnO structure. While Zn and O states are highly hybridized, V contribution is dominating for VP and PDOS of P are almost negligible. Figure 6, similarly to Figure 3C,D, demonstrates more prominent redistribution of ZnO valence band states and less that of its conduction band.
For the reference, non-stoichiometric configurations of one and three-layer thick VP/ZnO hybrid structure were modelled (see Table 3). The calculated stacking energies revealed that favorable configuration of VP and ZnO slabs’ mutual arrangement remains the same ([P_top_Zn:V_hex]). These values, however, should not be compared to those obtained for stoichiometric structures directly as uniform adsorption of a whole P layer is required to turn from one to another.
In addition, the charge and spin density distributions were analyzed. The negative charge on VP slab demonstrates the electron transferred to it from the ZnO slab (Figure 7).
The amount of charge transfer estimated by the AIM (Bader) method [73,74,75] is listed in Table 4. The same non-uniform trend is observed for both charge and spin distribution as the number of layers increases. The latter is generally in agreement with values calculated for pristine VP slabs.
According to Figure 8, which demonstrates spin density spatial distribution, the topmost V layer gains the most of the magnetic moment while the magnetism in deeper-lying V atoms is rather quenched with the increase in the number of VP layers in the composite.

4. Conclusions

The atomic and electronic structure of VP thin films was calculated and the possibility of VP/ZnO composite formation was proven by quantum chemical modelling. Configuration characterized by phosphorous atoms being atop the Zn ones and vanadium atoms placed above the hexagon centre was found to be favourable for all structures considered regardless of the number of VP layers and stoichiometry of structure. The valence band is mostly formed by the ZnO slab while VP states are more prominent in the conduction band. Zinc and oxygen states are highly hybridized whereas VP DOS rises mainly from vanadium atoms. The topmost V atoms are visibly spin-polarized which opens opportunities for various applications of these structures in spintronics as magnetic substrates for organic molecules or metal complexes adsorption and in catalysis as magnetic catalysts that can be removed from the solution with external magnet. These applications are to be further investigated.

Author Contributions

Quantum chemical calculations were performed by J.M., A.S.K., E.A.K. using computational resources of Laboratory of Physics of Magnetic Phenomena, Kirensky Institute of Physics headed by S.G.O. Original draft prepared by A.S.K., edited by E.A.K., supervised by S.G.O. The concept inspired by A.A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation, grant number 20-73-00179.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Information Technology Centre, Novosibirsk State University for providing access to their supercomputers. The authors dedicate this article to the memory of Alexander A. Kuzubov.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Galdámez-Martinez, A.; Santana, G.; Güell, F.; Martínez-Alanis, P.R.; Dutt, A. Photoluminescence of ZnO Nanowires: A Review. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Boujnah, M.; Boumdyan, M.; Naji, S.; Benyoussef, A.; El Kenz, A.; Loulidi, M. High efficiency of transmittance and electrical conductivity of V doped ZnO used in solar cells applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 671, 560–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, Q.; Hou, S.; Li, C. Titanium Dioxide-Coated Zinc Oxide Nanorods as an Efficient Photoelectrode in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ahmed, F.; Arshi, N.; Dwivedi, S.; Koo, B.H.; Azam, A.; Alsharaeh, E. Low temperature growth of ZnO nanotubes for fluorescence quenching detection of DNA. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2016, 27, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Saleem, M.; Farooq, W.A.; Khan, M.I.; Akhtar, M.N.; Rehman, S.U.; Ahmad, N.; Khalid, M.; Atif, M.; AlMutairi, M.A.; Irfan, M. Effect of ZnO Nanoparticles Coating Layers on Top of ZnO Nanowires for Morphological, Optical, and Photovoltaic Properties of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Micromachines 2019, 10, 819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Li, X.; Chen, X.; Yi, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Tang, Y.; Yi, Y. Fabriction of ZnO Nanorods with Strong UV Absorption and Different Hydrophobicity on Foamed Nickel under Different Hydrothermal Conditions. Micromachines 2019, 10, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Lamson, T.L.; Khan, S.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.K.; Yu, Y.; Chen, Z.S.; Xu, H. Patterned Synthesis of ZnO Nanorod Arrays for Nanoplasmonic Waveguide Applications. Opt. Commun. 2018, 411, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lupan, O.; Pauporté, T.; Viana, B. Low-voltage UV-electroluminescence from ZnO-nanowire Array/p-GaN light-emitting diodes. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 3298–3302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pauporté, T.; Lupan, O.; Zhang, J.; Tugsuz, T.; Ciofini, I.; Labat, F.; Viana, B. Low-Temperature Preparation of Ag-Doped ZnO Nanowire Arrays, DFT Study, and Application to Light-Emitting Diode. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 11871–11880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lupan, O.; Pauporté, T.; Le Bahers, T.; Ciofini, I.; Viana, B. High Aspect Ratio Ternary Zn1−xCdxO Nanowires by Electrodeposition for Light-Emitting Diode Applications. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 14548–14558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, L.; Jiang, J.; Han, X.; Deng, G.; Chi, C.; Song, J. n-ZnO/p-GaN heterojunction light-emitting diodes featuring a buried polarization-induced tunneling junction. AIP Adv. 2016, 6, 125204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rahman, M.A.; Scott, J.A.; Gentle, A.; Phillips, M.R.; Ton-That, C. A facile method for bright, colour-tunable light-emitting diodes based on Ga-doped ZnO nanorods. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 425707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Davydova, M.; Laposa, A.; Smarhak, J.; Kromka, A.; Neykova, N.; Nahlik, J.; Kroutil, J.; Drahokoupil, J.; Voves, J. Gas-sensing behaviour of ZnO/diamond nanostructures. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Do, T.A.T.; Ho, T.G.; Bui, T.H.; Pham, Q.N.; Giang, H.T.; Do, T.T.; Nguyen, D.V.; Tran, D.L. Surface-plasmon-enhanced ultraviolet emission of Au-decorated ZnO structures for gas sensing and photocatalytic devices. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 771–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Nugraha; Saputro, A.G.; Agusta, M.K.; Yuliarto, B.; Dipojono, H.K.; Rusydi, F.; Maezono, R. Selectivity of CO and NO adsorption on ZnO (0002) surfaces: A DFT investigation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 410, 373–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lin, C.F.; Kao, C.H.; Lin, C.Y.; Chen, K.L.; Lin, Y.H. NH3 Plasma-Treated Magnesium Doped Zinc Oxide in Biomedical Sensors with Electrolyte–Insulator–Semiconductor (EIS) Structure for Urea and Glucose Applications. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Bai, Z.Q.; Liu, Z.W. A broadband photodetector based on Rhodamine B-sensitized ZnO nanowires film. Sci Rep. 2017, 7, 11384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Chen, C.; Zhou, P.; Wang, N.; Ma, Y.; San, H. UV-Assisted Photochemical Synthesis of Reduced Graphene Oxide/ZnO Nanowires Composite for Photoresponse Enhancement in UV Photodetectors. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Naghizadeh, M.; Taher, M.A.; Tamaddon, A.M. Facile synthesis and characterization of magnetic nanocomposite ZnO/CoFe2O4 hetero-structure for rapid photocatalytic degradation of imidacloprid. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Qi, K.; Xing, X.; Zada, A.; Li, M.; Wang, Q.; Liu, S.; Lin, H.; Wang, G. Transition metal doped ZnO nanoparticles with enhanced photocatalytic and antibacterial performances: Experimental and DFT studies. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 1494–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, R.; Wang, J.; Luo, S.; Xiang, L.; Li, W.; Xie, D. Unraveling photoexcited electron transfer pathway of oxygen vacancy-enriched ZnO/Pd hybrid toward visible light-enhanced methane detection at a relatively low temperature. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 264, 118554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, J.; Hu, C.; Xia, Y.; Zhang, B. Mesoporous ZnO nanosheets with rich surface oxygen vacancies for UV-activated methane gas sensing at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 333, 129547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Khai, T.V.; Thu, L.V.; Ha, L.T.T.; Thanh, V.M.; Lam, T.D. Structural, optical and gas sensing properties of vertically well-aligned ZnO nanowires grown on graphene/Si substrate by thermal evaporation method. Mater. Charact. 2018, 141, 296–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mondal, P.; Appani, S.K.; Sutar, D.S.; Major, S.S. Effect of oxygen partial pressure on the behavior of Ga-doped ZnO/p-Si heterojunction diodes fabricated by reactive sputtering. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021, 32, 4248–4257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pham, A.T.T.; Hoang, D.V.; Nguyen, T.H.; Le, O.K.T.; Wong, D.P.; Kuo, J.L.; Chen, K.H.; Phan, T.B.; Tran, V.C. Hydrogen enhancing Ga doping efficiency and electron mobility in high-performance transparent conducting Ga-doped ZnO films. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 860, 158518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Simanjuntak, F.M.; Prasad, O.K.; Panda, D.; Lin, C.A.; Tsai, T.L.; Wei, K.H.; Tseng, T.Y. Impacts of Co doping on ZnO transparent switching memory device characteristics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 108, 183506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Drewelow, G.; Reed, A.; Stone, C.; Roh, K.; Jiang, Z.T.; Truc, L.N.T.; No, K.; Park, H.; Lee, S. Work function investigations of Al-doped ZnO for band-alignment in electronic and optoelectronic applications. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 484, 990–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gao, Q.; Dai, Y.; Han, B.; Zhu, W.; Li, X.; Li, C. Enhanced gas-sensitivity and ferromagnetism performances by the Ni-doping induced oxygen vacancies in (Mn, Ni) codoped ZnO nanorods. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 490, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ali, N.; Vijaya, A.R.; Khan, Z.A.; Tarafder, K.; Kumar, A.; Wadhwa, M.K.; Singh, B.; Ghosh, S. Ferromagnetism from non-magnetic ions: Ag-doped ZnO. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 20039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hurma, T. Effect of boron doping concentration on structural optical electrical properties of nanostructured ZnO films. J. Mol. Struct. 2019, 1189, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sankar ganesh, R.; Navaneethan, M.; Mani, G.K.; Ponnusamy, S.; Tsuchiya, K.; Muthamizhchelvan, C.; Kawasaki, S.; Hayakawa, Y. Influence of Al doping on the structural, morphological, optical, and gas sensing properties of ZnO nanorods. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 698, 555–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ajala, F.; Hamrouni, A.; Houas, A.; Lachheb, H.; Megna, B.; Palmisano, L.; Parrino, F. The influence of Al doping on the photocatalytic activity of nanostructured ZnO: The role of adsorbed water. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 445, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhou, Z.F.; Ren, G.K.; Tan, X.; Liu, R.; Liu, C.; Lin, Y.H.; Nan, C.W. Enhancing the thermoelectric performance of ZnO epitaxial films by Ga doping and thermal tuning. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 24128–24135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jiang, M.; He, G.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Z.; Zheng, L.; Shan, C.; Shen, D.; Fang, X. Wavelength-Tunable Electroluminescent Light Sources from Individual Ga-Doped ZnO Microwires. Small 2017, 13, 1604034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bharath, S.P.; Bangera, K.V.; Shivakumar, G.K. Enhanced gas sensing properties of indium doped ZnO thin films. Superlattices Microstruct. 2018, 124, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chang, L.W.; Sung, Y.C.; Yeh, J.W.; Shih, H.C. Enhanced optoelectronic performance from the Ti-doped ZnO nanowires. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 109, 074318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Oliveira, J.A.; Nogueira, A.E.; Gonçalves, M.C.P.; Paris, E.C.; Ribeiro, C.; Poirier, G.Y.; Giraldi, T.R. Photoactivity of N-doped ZnO nanoparticles in oxidative and reductive reactions. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 433, 879–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kumari, V.; Mittal, A.; Jindal, J.; Yadav, S.; Kumar, N. S-, N- and C-doped ZnO as semiconductor photocatalysts: A review. Front. Mater. Sci. 2019, 13, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gayen, R.N.; Paul, R. Phosphorous doping in vertically aligned ZnO nanorods grown by wet-chemical method. Nano-Struct. Nano-Objects 2018, 13, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Murkute, P.; Sushama, S.; Ghadi, H.; Saha, S.; Chakrabarti, S. Effects of phosphorus implantation time on the optical, structural, and elemental properties of ZnO thin films and its correlation with the 3.31-eV peak. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 768, 800–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nasser, R.; Othmen, W.B.H.; Elhouichet, H. Effect of Sb doping on the electrical and dielectric properties of ZnO nanocrystals. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 8000–8007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Joshi, B.N.; Yoon, H.; Na, S.-H.; Choi, J.-Y.; Yoon, S.S. Enhanced photocatalytic performance of graphene-ZnO nanoplatelet composite thin films prepared by electrostatic spray deposition. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 3647–3654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lonkar, S.P.; Pillai, V.; Abdala, A. Solvent-free synthesis of ZnO-graphene nanocomposite with superior photocatalytic activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 465, 1107–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xue, B.; Zou, Y. High photocatalytic activity of ZnO–graphene composite. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 529, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Nguyen, V.N.; Tran, D.T.; Nguyen, M.T.; Le, T.T.T.; Ha, M.N.; Nguyen, M.V.; Pham, T.D. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange using ZnO/graphene oxide nanocomposites. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2018, 44, 3081–3095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Guo, J.; Legum, B.; Anasori, B.; Wang, K.; Lelyukh, P.; Gogotsi, Y.; Randall, C.A. Cold Sintered Ceramic Nanocomposites of 2D MXene and Zinc Oxide. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1801846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Liu, X.; Chen, C. Mxene enhanced the photocatalytic activity of ZnO nanorods under visible light. Mater. Lett. 2020, 261, 127127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lu, P.; Wu, J.; Shen, X.; Gao, X.; Shi, Z.; Lu, M.; Yu, W.W.; Zhang, Y. ZnO–Ti3C2 MXene Electron Transport Layer for High External Quantum Efficiency Perovskite Nanocrystal Light-Emitting Diodes. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 2001562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xu, Y.; Wu, R.; Zhang, J.; Shia, Y.; Zhang, B. Anion-exchange synthesis of nanoporous FeP nanosheets as electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 6656–6658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Popczun, E.J.; McKone, J.R.; Read, C.G.; Biacchi, A.J.; Wiltrout, A.M.; Lewis, N.S.; Schaak, R.E. Nanostructured Nickel Phosphide as an Electrocatalyst for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 9267–9270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tian, L.; Yan, X.; Chen, X. Electrochemical Activity of Iron Phosphide Nanoparticles in Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 5441–5448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. McEnaney, J.M.; Crompton, J.C.; Callejas, J.F.; Popczun, E.J.; Read, C.G.; Lewis, N.S.; Schaak, R.E. Electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution using amorphous tungsten phosphide nanoparticles. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 11026–11028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Callejas, J.F.; Read, C.G.; Roske, C.W.; Lewis, N.S.; Schaak, R.E. Synthesis, Characterization, and Properties of Metal Phosphide Catalysts for the Hydrogen-Evolution Reaction. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 6017–6044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, C.; Gao, H.; Wan, W.; Mueller, T. Mechanisms for hydrogen evolution on transition metal phosphide catalysts and a comparison to Pt (111). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 24489–24498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Shao, Y.; Shi, X.; Pan, H. Electronic, Magnetic, and Catalytic Properties of Thermodynamically Stable Two-Dimensional Transition-Metal Phosphides. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 8892–8900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Cheng, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, H.; Liu, H.; Yu, X.; Dai, X.; Liu, G.; Chen, G. Ti2P monolayer as a high performance 2-D electrode material for ion batteries. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020, 22, 18480–18487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liu, Q.; Xing, J.; Jiang, Z.; Jiang, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, J. 2D tetragonal transition-metal phosphides: An ideal platform to screen metal shrouded crystals for multifunctional applications. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 6776–6784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kadioglu, Y. Ballistic transport and optical properties of a new half-metallic monolayer: Vanadium phosphide. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2021, 268, 115111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Blöchl, P.E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50, 17953–17979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Kresse, G.; Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 1758–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169–11186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kresse, G.; Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 1993, 47, 558–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kresse, G.; Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal–amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 49, 14251–14269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 1996, 6, 15–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Grimme, S.; Antony, J.; Ehrlich, S.; Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 154104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Monkhorst, H.J.; Pack, J.D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 1976, 13, 5188–5192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sowa, H.; Ahsbahs, H. High-pressure X-ray investigation of zincite ZnO single crystals using diamond anvils with an improved shape. J. Appl. Cryst. 2006, 39, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Schoenberg, N. An X-ray investigation of transition metal phosphides. Acta Chem. Scand. 1954, 8, 226–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Rossi, L.M.; Costa, N.J.S.; Silva, F.P.; Wojcieszak, R. Magnetic nanomaterials in catalysis: Advanced catalysts for magnetic separation and beyond. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 2906–2933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Biz, C.; Fianchini, M.; Gracia, J. Catalysis Meets Spintronics; Spin Potentials Associated with Open-Shell Orbital Configurations Enhance the Activity of Pt3Co Nanostructures for Oxygen Reduction: A Density Functional Theory Study. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 506–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Campbell, V.E.; Tonelli, M.; Cimatti, I.; Moussy, J.-B.; Tortech, L.; Dappe, Y.J.; Rivière, E.; Guillot, R.; Delprat, S.; Mattana, R.; et al. Engineering the magnetic coupling and anisotropy at the molecule–magnetic surface interface in molecular spintronic devices. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Tang, W.; Sanville, E.; Henkelman, G. A grid-based Bader analysis algorithm without lattice bias. J. Phys. Comput. Mater. 2009, 21, 084204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Sanville, E.; Kenny, S.D.; Smith, R.; Henkelman, G. An improved grid-based algorithm for Bader charge allocation. J. Comp. Chem. 2007, 28, 899–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Henkelman, G.; Arnaldsson, A.; Jónsson, H. A fast and robust algorithm for Bader decomposition of charge density. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2006, 36, 254–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 11 01412 g001 550
Figure 1. Atomic structure of VP thin films. (A) stoichiometric (V2P2) and (B) non-stoichiometric (V2P3) VP bilayer.
Figure 1. Atomic structure of VP thin films. (A) stoichiometric (V2P2) and (B) non-stoichiometric (V2P3) VP bilayer.
Nanomaterials 11 01412 g001
Nanomaterials 11 01412 g002 550
Figure 2. VP slab orientation with respect to ZnO in VP/ZnO composites. (A) [P_top_O:V_hex]; (B) [P_top_O:P_hex]; (C) [P_top_Zn:V_hex]; (D) [V_top_O:P_hex].
Figure 2. VP slab orientation with respect to ZnO in VP/ZnO composites. (A) [P_top_O:V_hex]; (B) [P_top_O:P_hex]; (C) [P_top_Zn:V_hex]; (D) [V_top_O:P_hex].
Nanomaterials 11 01412 g002
Nanomaterials 11 01412 g003 550
Figure 3. DOS for VP monolayer/ZnO composite. (A) Black and red lines correspond to composite TDOS and ZnO PDOS; (B) black and green lines correspond to composite TDOS and VP monolayer PDOS; (C) black and red lines correspond to TDOS of pristine ZnO slab and PDOS of ZnO fragment in VP monolayer/ZnO composite; (D) black and green lines correspond to TDOS of pristine VP monolayer and PDOS of VP in the composite structure, respectively.
Figure 3. DOS for VP monolayer/ZnO composite. (A) Black and red lines correspond to composite TDOS and ZnO PDOS; (B) black and green lines correspond to composite TDOS and VP monolayer PDOS; (C) black and red lines correspond to TDOS of pristine ZnO slab and PDOS of ZnO fragment in VP monolayer/ZnO composite; (D) black and green lines correspond to TDOS of pristine VP monolayer and PDOS of VP in the composite structure, respectively.
Nanomaterials 11 01412 g003
Nanomaterials 11 01412 g004 550
Figure 4. DOS for V3P3/ZnO composite. (A) Black and red lines correspond to composite TDOS and ZnO PDOS; (B) black and green lines correspond to composite TDOS and VP PDOS; (C) black and red lines correspond to TDOS of pristine ZnO slab and PDOS of ZnO fragment in V3P3/ZnO composite; (D) black and green lines correspond to TDOS of pristine V3P3 slab and PDOS of VP in the composite structure, respectively.
Figure 4. DOS for V3P3/ZnO composite. (A) Black and red lines correspond to composite TDOS and ZnO PDOS; (B) black and green lines correspond to composite TDOS and VP PDOS; (C) black and red lines correspond to TDOS of pristine ZnO slab and PDOS of ZnO fragment in V3P3/ZnO composite; (D) black and green lines correspond to TDOS of pristine V3P3 slab and PDOS of VP in the composite structure, respectively.
Nanomaterials 11 01412 g004
Nanomaterials 11 01412 g005 550
Figure 5. DOS for V4P4/ZnO composite. Black, red (A), green (B), blue (C) and brown (D) lines corresponds to composite TDOS and Zn, O, V and P atoms PDOS, respectively.
Figure 5. DOS for V4P4/ZnO composite. Black, red (A), green (B), blue (C) and brown (D) lines corresponds to composite TDOS and Zn, O, V and P atoms PDOS, respectively.
Nanomaterials 11 01412 g005
Nanomaterials 11 01412 g006 550
Figure 6. DOS for V4P4/ZnO composite. (A) Black and red lines correspond to TDOS of pristine ZnO slab and PDOS of ZnO fragment in V4P4/ZnO composite; (B) black and green lines correspond to TDOS of pristine V4P4 slab and PDOS of VP in the composite structure, respectively.
Figure 6. DOS for V4P4/ZnO composite. (A) Black and red lines correspond to TDOS of pristine ZnO slab and PDOS of ZnO fragment in V4P4/ZnO composite; (B) black and green lines correspond to TDOS of pristine V4P4 slab and PDOS of VP in the composite structure, respectively.
Nanomaterials 11 01412 g006
Nanomaterials 11 01412 g007 550
Figure 7. Charge density distribution in V2P2/ZnO composite. Blue and yellow areas correspond to the lack and excess of charge, respectively.
Figure 7. Charge density distribution in V2P2/ZnO composite. Blue and yellow areas correspond to the lack and excess of charge, respectively.
Nanomaterials 11 01412 g007
Nanomaterials 11 01412 g008 550
Figure 8. Spin density distribution in VP/ ZnO composites with four (A), two (B) and one layer (C) of VP.
Figure 8. Spin density distribution in VP/ ZnO composites with four (A), two (B) and one layer (C) of VP.
Nanomaterials 11 01412 g008
Table
Table 1. Lattice parameter a, magnetic moment and stability of stoichiometric and non-stoichiometric configurations of VP from one to four layers.
Table 1. Lattice parameter a, magnetic moment and stability of stoichiometric and non-stoichiometric configurations of VP from one to four layers.
ConfigurationMagnetic Moment, μBa, Å
Bulk VP0.0003.130
VP monolayer2.0002.962
VP20.7563.214
V2P21.6363.058
V2P30.0003.058
V3P31.5113.078
V3P40.1473.111
V4P41.7913.086
V4P50.0253.115
Table
Table 2. Stacking energies and magnetic moments for different VP slab orientation in structures with one and four VP layers.
Table 2. Stacking energies and magnetic moments for different VP slab orientation in structures with one and four VP layers.
StructureV4P4 VP Monolayer
Estack, eVµ, µBEstack, eVµ, µB
[P_top_O:V_hex]−0.6371.159−0.4651.390
[P_top_O:P_hex]−0.6441.206−0.6552.163
[P_top_Zn:V_hex]−1.2731.242−1.1672.285
[V_top_O:P_hex]−0.7051.250−0.772
Table
Table 3. Stacking energies (Estack) for non-stoichiometric VP/ZnO composites, eV.
Table 3. Stacking energies (Estack) for non-stoichiometric VP/ZnO composites, eV.
Composite StructureVP2V3P4
[P_top_O:V_hex]−1.861−3.975
[P_top_O:P_hex]−1.651−3.781
[P_top_Zn:V_hex]−2.204−4.388
[V_top_O:P_hex]−1.662−3.781
Table
Table 4. Charge (QVP) and magnetic moment (µVP) of VP slab in VP/ZnO composites according to Bader analysis.
Table 4. Charge (QVP) and magnetic moment (µVP) of VP slab in VP/ZnO composites according to Bader analysis.
Number of LayersQVP, e−µVP, µB
4−0.1171.896
3−0.1861.355
2−0.1771.842
1−0.0792.254
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kholtobina, A.S.; Kovaleva, E.A.; Melchakova, J.; Ovchinnikov, S.G.; Kuzubov, A.A. Theoretical Investigation of the Prospect to Tailor ZnO Electronic Properties with VP Thin Films. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1412. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061412

AMA Style

Kholtobina AS, Kovaleva EA, Melchakova J, Ovchinnikov SG, Kuzubov AA. Theoretical Investigation of the Prospect to Tailor ZnO Electronic Properties with VP Thin Films. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(6):1412. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061412

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kholtobina, Anastasiia S., Evgenia A. Kovaleva, Julia Melchakova, Sergey G. Ovchinnikov, and Alexander A. Kuzubov. 2021. "Theoretical Investigation of the Prospect to Tailor ZnO Electronic Properties with VP Thin Films" Nanomaterials 11, no. 6: 1412. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061412

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop