Next Article in Journal
Facile Synthesis of g-C3N4/MoO3 Nanohybrid for Efficient Removal of Aqueous Diclofenac Sodium
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of De-Twinning on Tensile Strength of Nano-Twinned Cu Films
Previous Article in Journal
Sono-Biosynthesis and Characterization of AuNPs from Danube Delta Nymphaea alba Root Extracts and Their Biological Properties
Previous Article in Special Issue
Carrier Blocking Layer Materials and Application in Organic Photodetectors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhancement of Luminescence Efficiency of Y2O3 Nanophosphor via Core/Shell Structure

1
Korea Conformity Laboratories, 17-22, Cheomdangwagi-ro 208 beon-gil, Buk-gu, Gwangju 61011, Korea
2
Intelligent Optical Module Research Center, Korea Photonics Technology Institute, Cheomdanvenchure-ro 108 beon-gil 9, Buk-gu, Gwangju 500-779, Korea
3
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Hanyang University, 222, Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(6), 1563; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061563
Submission received: 30 April 2021 / Revised: 6 June 2021 / Accepted: 10 June 2021 / Published: 14 June 2021

Abstract

:
We successfully fabricated Y2O3:RE3+ (RE = Eu, Tb, and Dy) core and core–shell nanophosphors by the molten salt method and sol–gel processes with Y2O3 core size of the order of 100~150 nm. The structural and morphological studies of the RE3+-doped Y2O3 nanophosphors are analyzed by using XRD, SEM and TEM techniques, respectively. The concentration and annealing temperature dependent structural and luminescence characteristics were studied for Y2O3:RE3+ core and core–shell nanophosphors. It is observed that the XRD peaks became narrower as annealing temperature increased in the core–shell nanophosphor. This indicates that annealing at higher temperature improves the crystallinity which in turn enhances the average crystallite size. The emission intensity and quantum yield of the Eu3+-doped Y2O3 core and core–shell nanoparticles increased significantly when annealing temperature is varied from 450 to 550 °C. No considerable variation was noticed in the case of Y2O3:Tb3+ and Y2O3:Dy3+ core and core–shell nanophosphors.

1. Introduction

For the past few decades, nanomaterials have received particular attention for luminescence and photonic device application due to their interesting characteristics including high surface-to-volume ratio and the quantum confinement effect. When compared to bulk materials, these nanosized phosphors exhibit considerable modifications in the structure that include size, morphology, and crystallinity. Thus, in particular, rare earth-doped luminescent nanomaterials have been paid much attention as they play an important role in the luminescent devices such as displays, light emitting diodes, biological assays, and optoelectronics [1,2,3,4]. Rare-earth ions in a nanoscale host material are particularly interesting because of their unique properties such as luminescence in all spectral ranges from UV to IR, narrow emission linewidths, longer lifetime, and high quantum efficiency. Of the different sesquioxides, yttrium oxide (Y2O3) has been studied widely as a host material for rare earth ion doping in photonics and optoelectronics because of its thermo-mechanical properties, optical transparency (0.2–8 μm), and thermodynamically stable crystal structures. In addition, Y2O3 has a relatively low annealing temperature (400 °C), high refractive index (~1.8), and low maximum phonon energy (380 cm−1), which make it a very promising host material for the production of efficient luminescent media, as well as for infrared ceramics [5]. Moreover, Y2O3 can be doped with different types of RE ions to produce strong luminescence over a wide range of wavelengths due to similarities in the atomic radii, crystal structure, and lattice constant of rare earth ions [6,7]. Among the rare earth ions, the Eu3+, Tb3+ and Dy3+ are particularly interesting for display device applications as they emit the luminescence in the visible region of red, green, and blue arising from the 4f–4f transitions, respectively.
In order to enhance the luminescence efficiency, it is necessary to control the phosphor size and crystallinity. In view of the above importance, numerous studies have been focused on different methods to synthesize nanocrystalline phosphor particles with different size and morphology, such as solid state reaction, spray pyrolysis, co-precipitation, sol–gel, solution combustion, hydrothermal, etc. Of the wet chemical methods, the molten salt synthesis technique has been used to produce single-phase nanoparticles at low processing temperature with a short duration reaction time and less residual filths. It is found that the rare earth-doped phosphors have shown a decrease in luminescence as the size of these particles changes to the nanoscale from the microscale due to the presence of parasitic surface quenching sites or partial diffusion of rare earth ions in host lattices, high rare earth dopant concentrations, and energy transfer to adjacent ions, that can quench the luminescence of rare earth ions in nanoparticles [8].
Therefore, it has been demonstrated that the passive shell layer around the core can reduce the surface OH groups’ absorption and undesirable energy transfer between dopant ions, resulting increase in the luminescence properties [9,10]. The structure of the RE-doped active core as shown in the schematic diagram (see Figure 1a). As can be seen from Figure 1a, the optically active core directly interacts with the surface hydroxyl groups that can quench the luminescence intensity and lifetime of active core. A.K. Parchur et al. [9] and Dorman et al. [10] reported that the effect of the surface hydroxyl groups could be controlled by developing a passive shell layer around the core. The passive shell coated RE-doped active core is shown in the schematic diagram (Figure 1b). The core–shell nanostructures are used to increase the luminescence efficiency by removing the surface quenching sites. The purpose of the passive shell is to increase the distance between the surface quenching site and the doped ions in the core.
Thus, in the present work, RE3+ (Eu, Tb, Dy)-doped Y2O3 nanophosphors with passive shells were fabricated by the molten synthesis method and sol–gel processes and their structural, morphological and luminescence properties studied with core–shell modification for the enhancement of luminescence efficiency.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fabricated RE-Doped Y2O3 Core by the Molten Salt Method

The RE (Eu, Tb and Dy)-doped Y2O3 core nanoparticles were synthesized by molten salt synthesis using analytical grade Y(NO3)3 and RE(NO3)3 raw materials with purity of 99.9%. The RE-doped Y2O3 core nanoparticles were prepared according to the formula (Y100-xREx)2O3 (x = 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20 for Eu, Tb and Dy). In the molten salt synthesis process, the RE raw materials were mixed with a 1.7:1 mole ratio of NaNO3 and KNO3 for 10 min, forming a well-mixed powder. Then, the mixture was taken into a covered alumina crucible and heated in an electrical furnace at different temperatures of 450, 500, and 550 °C for 3 h. Then, the powders were cooled down to room temperature. The obtained powder was washed with deionized water until the salt solution was dilute enough to avoid crystallization of the supernatant. The remaining powders were dried at 100 °C overnight.

2.2. Y2O3 Passive Shell Coated Core

Deposition of the RE2O3 was carried out with the creation of a solution containing 5 mM urea (Sigma Aldrich, Seoul, Korea) and 0.1 mM RECl3 (Alfa Aesar 99.9%, Incheon, Korea), depending on the desired thickness. The thickness of the shell layer was controlled by varying the ratio (χ) between the mass of the RECl3 precursor and the mass of Y2O3 core particles. After the urea and RE salts were dissolved, 0.1 g of the Y2O3 was suspended in the solution and the liquid was sonicated for 30 min, to break apart agglomerates for complete mixing. The solution was heated at 80 °C for 4 h to promote the shell deposition. The resulting suspension was centrifuged and the resulting supernatant solutions were discarded. Afterwards, the particles were dried at 100 °C overnight. Finally, the powder was annealed at 750 °C for 3 h to remove any urea and to crystallize the RE2O3 shell.

2.3. Characterization Techniques

The structural analysis of RE-doped Y2O3 core nanophosphors was carried out using an X-ray diffractometer (PANalytical, Almelo, Netherlands) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å) as the source in the range of 10° to 80° at a step rate of 0.2°/min for crystalline phase identification. The passive shell layer structure was not analyzed using the XRD technique because of its low sensitivity as well as diffractions peaks overlapping in the range of 0° to 60°. The scanning electron microscope (SEM, Hitachi, S-4700, Houghton, Michigan, USA) was used for the identification of size of the synthesized RE-doped Y2O3 core and the Y2O3 passive shell coating thickness was confirmed using a transmission electron microscope (TEM, FEI TECNAI, F20UT, Hillsboro, Oregon, USA). The luminescence spectra were measured for the RE-doped core and core–shell nanoparticles using a spectrofluorimeter (Horiba Jobin Yvon Fluorolog3, Irvine, California, USA). The quantum yield measurements were carried out using an absolute photoluminescence quantum yields measurement system (Horiba Jobin Yvon Fluorolog3, Irvine, California, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2a–c show the diffraction patterns of the as-prepared and RE3+-doped Y2O3 nanophosphors annealed at different temperatures and were obtained by X-ray diffractometer under the same experimental conditions. The XRD spectra showed a distinctive peaks and clearly indicate crystalline nature even for the as-prepared Y2O3 sample. The observed diffraction peaks are indexed to (211), (222), (400), (440), and (622) of cubic Y2O3 and matched to the JCPDS card no. 41–1105. This indicated that the as-prepared and RE3+-doped nanoparticles have the characteristic Y2O3 cubic structure with space group of Ia3. A strong peak at 2θ = 29.5° was observed, attributed to the plane (222). Similar behavior has been reported elsewhere [11,12,13,14,15]. An annealing process was performed for the RE3+-doped nanophosphors in order to disperse the RE ions into the lattice and in turn to increase the total luminescence of the nanoparticles. The samples were annealed in the range from 450 to 550 °C for 3 h. The position of the diffraction peaks was not changed with the applied annealing temperature and confirm the presence of single cubic crystalline structure of RE-doped Y2O3 nanoparticles. Figure 2d depicts the variation of peak width (FWHM) as a function of annealing temperature varied from 450 to 550 °C in RE3+-doped Y2O3 nanophosphors. It can be observed that the XRD peaks become narrower on annealing the samples at higher temperatures. Based on the narrowing of the diffraction peaks, it can be concluded that the size of the crystallites increases. An indication of crystallinity increase could be flattening of the amorphous hump (if present) or possibly lowering of the baseline. The crystallize size (D) of RE3+-doped nanophosphors can be estimated from the well-known Debye–Scherrer’s equation shown below [16],
D = 0.9 λ β cos θ
where λ is the wavelength of the X-ray source (1.5406 Å), β is the full width at half maximum of intense diffraction peak (222) in the XRD pattern, and θ is the Bragg diffraction angle. The crystallite size of the RE3+-doped nanophosphors annealed at different temperatures was calculated using the Scherrer’s equation and tabulated in Table 1. It was noted that the crystallite size of the nanophosphors increased as the annealing temperature increased from 450 °C to 550 °C. The crystallite size of the present nanophosphors calculated from the Scherrer’s equation was compared to the crystallite size of the RE3+-doped nanophosphors determined from the Hall–Williamsons equation as shown in Table 1.
The morphology of the synthesized undoped and RE3+-doped nanophosphors was analyzed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM) techniques. Figure 3a–d show the SEM images of undoped Y2O3 and RE3+-Y2O3 (RE = Eu, Tb, and Dy) nanophosphors. It is noticed that the resultant nanoparticles are in a spherical shape and uniform with an average size of approximately 100~150 nm. The inset of Figure 3a–d shows the TEM images of the undoped Y2O3 and Y2O3:RE3+ (RE = Eu, Tb, and Dy) nanophosphors. The change in mass ratio of the YCl3 raw material and Y2O3 core can control the shell layer thickness deposited around the core. TEM images confirmed the thickness of the core–shell nanoparticles. It is found that the surface of Y2O3 nanoparticles have irregular shell structures. It is worth mentioning that the exact thickness of the shell layer is difficult to determine from the TEM images due to slight contrast at core–shell interface.
Figure 4a shows the luminescence spectra of 0.05 mMol%Eu3+:Y2O3 nanophosphor, obtained under 254 nm excitation, respectively. As can be seen from the figure, the luminescence spectra exhibited emission lying between 580 nm and 700 nm originating from the 5D07Fj (j = 0–3) transitions of the Eu3+ ion. Among the emission peaks, the strongest peak at 611 nm and a less intense peak at 630 nm attributed to the 5D07F2 electric-dipole hypersensitive transition of Eu3+ ion in the yttrium oxide host and its intensity is sensitive to the environment, while the weak emission peaked at 580 nm corresponds to the 5D07F0 transition. The weak emission in the region 587–600 nm corresponds to the 5D07F1 magnetic-dipole transition of Eu3+ ion. Generally, the emission band at 611 nm can show strong emission when Eu3+ is located at a lower symmetry (without an inversion center), whereas the emission of magnetic dipole transition at 590 nm is stronger when Eu3+ is located at a higher symmetry (with an inversion center). From the emission spectrum of Eu3+ ion, it is clearly indicated that the Eu3+ ions are situated at lower symmetry as the emission at 611 nm corresponding to the 5D07F2 transition is dominant. From the emission spectrum in Figure 4a, it is confirmed that Eu3+ ions are preferably situated at crystallographic site without inversion center (C2) [19]. Figure 4b depicts the emission spectrum of Y2O3:0.05 mMol% Tb3+, obtained under 280 nm excitation. The luminescence spectrum exhibits its strongest peaks at around 545 nm (green emission), and a weak peak centered at 583 nm attributed to the 5D47F5, and 5D47F4 transitions of Tb3+ ion, respectively. Figure 4c displays the luminescence spectrum of the Dy3+-doped Y2O3 nanophosphors, obtained under an excitation wavelength of 350 nm. As can be seen from the emission spectrum of the Tb3+ ion, it is observed that the Dy3+ ion exhibits strong blue emission at around 472 nm attributed to the 4F9/26H15/2 transition of the Dy3+ ion (magnetic-dipole transition, insensitive to the local environment).
Based on the reported literature, it can be noticed that the RE3+ ion’s luminescence is often improved by thermal treatment. In this study, the effect of the annealing temperature on the luminescence properties of nanophosphors was investigated. The RE3+-doped Y2O3 nanophosphors were annealed in the temperature range from 450 to 550 °C. Figure 5a shows the variation of the luminescence intensity of RE3+-doped Y2O3 nanophosphor in the dependence of annealing temperature. It was found that the emission intensity of Eu3+ ion increased with the increase in annealing temperature due to the improvement of crystallite size in the Y2O3 nanophosphors. The same trend was observed in Eu3+-doped Y2O3 nanoparticles synthesized by the other methods [11,18,20]. The variation of emission intensity in Tb3+-doped Y2O3 nanophosphors in the dependence of annealing temperature as shown in Figure 5a. The emission intensity of Tb3+ ions at the green region increased with the increase in annealing temperature which changed from 450 to 550 °C. The trend of emission intensity in the dependence of annealing temperature could be due to a reduction in surface OH groups and the improvement of crystallite size of the nanophosphors. Figure 5a shows the variation of emission intensity for different annealing temperatures in Dy3+-doped Y2O3 nanophosphors. No considerable variation in the emission intensity for the annealed Dy3+-doped nanophosphors. This indicates that the Dy3+ environment was not changed with annealing temperature.
The effect of Eu3+ ions concentration on luminescence properties in Y2O3 nanophosphors was investigated as shown in Figure 5b. The emission intensity of Eu3+-doped Y2O3 nanophosphors (at 611 nm) increased with the increase in Eu3+ concentration up to 0.1 mol% and then decreased for further increase in Eu3+ ion concentration. The optimum Eu doping concentration in Y2O3 nanophosphor was obtained as 0.1 mol%. The enhanced intensity can be attributed to the increased luminescence active centers, while it decreased for higher Eu doping due to energy transfer through the cross-relaxation mechanism: Eu3+ (5D1) + Eu3+ (7F0) → Eu3+ (5D0) + Eu3+ (7F1) [21]. Figure 5b shows the emission intensity of Tb3+-doped Y2O3 nanophosphor with varying concentration. As the concentration of Tb3+ increases, the luminescence intensity decreases in the synthesized nanphosphors. The trend of the Tb3+ ion emission intensity with respect to concentration due to the energy transfer through the cross-relaxation mechanism between neighboring Tb3+ ions: Tb3+ (5D3) + Tb3+ (7F6) → Tb3+ (5D4) + Tb3+ (7F0). The intensity of the Dy3+ characteristic transition was not changed considerably with respect to the Dy3+ concentration varied from 0.05 to 0.2 mol% as shown in Figure 5b.
The photoluminescence QY of RE3+-doped Y2O3 nanophosphors was analyzed for different annealing temperatures and RE3+ ion concentrations as shown in Figure 5c,d. In the case of Eu3+-doped Y2O3 nanophosphor, the QY increased when the annealing temperature varied from 450 to 550 °C. When we consider the concentration, QY initially increases up to 0.1 mol% and then decreases after further increase in concentration up to 0.2 mol%. This illustrates the importance of considering different concentrations. The QY of Y2O3:Tb3+ and Y2O3:Dy3+ nanophosphors showed slight variation when annealing temperature and concentration varied as illustrated in Figure 5c,d.
Figure 6a–c show the diffraction patterns of the as-prepared and RE3+-doped Y2O3 core with Y2O3 passive shell nanophosphors annealed in the temperature range from 450 to 550 °C. From the figure, it is clear that the similar XRD patterns are observed for RE3+-doped Y2O3 core with Y2O3 passive shell nanophosphors when compared to the core nanoparticles. This indicates that the RE3+-doped nanoparticles exhibited a Y2O3 cubic crystal structure even with RE doping, a core–shell structure and annealed at different temperatures. Figure 6d presents the variation of FWHM with respect to the annealing temperature for the RE3+-doped Y2O3 core with Y2O3 passive shell. It is observed that the FWHM of RE3+-doped Y2O3 core with Y2O3 passive shell were analogous to the RE3+-doped Y2O3 core nanoparticles. The crystallite size of the nanophosphors was also improved with the core–shell nanostructure.
The 0.10 mMol% of Eu3+, 0.05 mMol% of Tb3+, and 0.05 mMol% of Dy3+-doped Y2O3 samples were chosen to compare the luminescence properties of RE3+-doped Y2O3 cores and RE3+-doped Y2O3 cores with Y2O3 passive shells as they exhibited the optimum luminescence intensity. Figure 7 definitively shows that the core–shell phosphors revealed a higher peak intensity as compared to the core nanoparticles due to increase in distance between surface quenching sites and RE3+ active ions. After the passive shell coating, the QY was also measured for the RE3+-doped core–shell nanoparticles along with RE3+-doped core nanoparticles (see Figure 8). Variation in emission intensity (Figure 4 and Figure 5a,b) is qualitative. In order to perform quantitative measurement, the photoluminescence quantum yield (QY) (based on integrated sphere) was carried out for the synthesized RE3+-doped nanophosphors with a core–shell structure. The photoluminescence QY is defined as the ratio of number of photons emitted to the number of photons absorbed. All of the reflected and emitted light can be collected where the concern regarding the angular dependence of the photoluminescence emission is no longer needed by implementing integrating sphere into photoluminescence QY measurements. Mello et al. [22] developed an equation for the determination of absolute photoluminescence QY as shown below,
Φ P L = E i n λ 1 α E o u t λ X e m p t y λ α
with
α = X o u t λ X i n λ X o u t λ
In the above equations, Ein(λ) and Eout(λ) are the integrated luminescence as a result of direct excitation and secondary excitation of the sample, respectively. The latter emission is due to reflected excitation light from sphere walls hitting the sample. Xempty(λ) is the integrated excitation profile with the empty sphere. α is the sample absorbance. The product of the photoluminescence QY and absorption coefficient reveals the brightness of a photoluminescent nanoparticle of the material. The absorption is an intrinsic characteristic of the material, while photoluminescence QY depends on the architecture of the nanoparticle and its immediate environment. It is widely accepted that core/shell engineering of RE-doped nanophosphors allows researchers to substantially improve the photoluminescence QY of the nanophosphors and subsequently their brightness, by means of an optically undoped passive layer. Safeguarding the emission intensity by a passive layer is attained by spatially separating the optically active core from the structural surface defects at the core interface. It can be seen that the QY increased significantly after shell coating in the Y2O3:Eu3+ nanophosphor. No considerable variation was noticed in the case of Y2O3:Tb3+ and Y2O3:Dy3+ nanophosphors.

4. Conclusions

In this work, the luminescence properties of RE3+-doped Y2O3 core and core–shell nanoparticles synthesized by the molten salt synthesis and sol–gel processes were investigated in the dependence of annealing temperature and active ion concentration. The morphology studies of the Y2O3 core and core–shell nanoparticles confirmed the nanoparticle size as approximately 100–150 nm in diameter with shell layer thickness up to 8 nm. The diffraction patterns of as-prepared, RE-doped core, and core–shell nanoparticles annealed at different temperatures showed a cubic Y2O3 crystal structure (JCPDS 41-1105). The optimum active ion concentration based on luminescence intensity was found to be 0.10 mMol%, 0.05 mMol%, and 0.05 mMol% for Eu3+-, Tb3+-, and Dy3+-doped nanophosphors, respectively. The luminescence intensity and quantum yield of RE-doped core–shell nanoparticles were compared with the Y2O3 core nanoparticles. The luminescence intensity and quantum yield of Eu3+-doped core nanophosphors enhanced after coating with the Y2O3 passive shell layer. No considerable variation was noticed in case of Tb3+- and Dy3+-doped Y2O3 nanophosphors.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.-B.I. and J.-H.C.; methodology, J.-Y.H. and K.-H.K.; formal analysis, K.L. and J.-P.K.; investigation, J.-P.K. and J.-H.C.; writing—original draft preparation, J.-Y.H. and K.-H.K.; writing—review and editing, K.L., W.-B.I. and J.-H.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Materials and Components Technology Development Program of MOTIE/KEIT, 20011325 (High refractive optical glass for GMP).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ronda, C.R. Phosphors for lamps and displays. J. Alloys Compd. 1995, 225, 534–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Song, H.W.; Chen, B.J.; Peng, H.S.; Zhang, J.S. Light-induced change of charge transfer band in nanocrystalline Y2O3:Eu3+. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81, 1776–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Wegh, R.T.; Donker, H.; Oskam, K.D.; Meijerink, A. Visible quantum cutting in LiGdF4:Eu3+ through downconversion. Science 1999, 283, 663–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mao, Y.; Tran, T.; Guo, X.; Huang, J.Y.; Shih, C.K.; Wang, K.L.; Chang, J.P. Luminescence of nanocrystalline erbium-doped yttria. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 748–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Singh, L.R.; Ningthoujam, R.S.; Sudarsan, V.; Srivastava, I.; Singh, S.D.; Dey, G.K.; Kulshreshtha, S.K. Luminescence study on Eu3+ doped Y2O3 nanoparticles: Particle size, concentration and core-shell formation effects. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 055201–055210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kodaira, C.A.; Stefani, R.; Maia, A.S.; Felinto, M.C.F.C.; Brito, H.F. Optical investigation of Y2O3:Sm3+ nanophosphor prepared by combustion and Pechini methods. J. Lumin. 2007, 127, 616–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, Z.X.; Hong, Z.; Zhao, Q.; Peng, L.; Zhang, P. Preparation and Luminescence Properties of Y2O3: Eu3+ Nanorods via Post Annealing Process. J. Rare Earths 2006, 24, 111–114. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yan, Y.; Faber, A.J.; de Waal, H. Luminescence quenching by OH groups in highly Er-doped phosphate glasses. J. Non Cryst. Solids 1995, 181, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Parchur, A.K.; Prasad, A.I.; Ansari, A.A.; Rai, S.B.; Ningthoujam, R.S. Luminescence properties of Tb3+-doped CaMoO4 nanoparticles: Annealing effect, polar medium dispersible, polymer film and core-shell formation. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 11032–11045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dorman, J.A.; Choi, J.H.; Kuzmanich, G.; Chang, J.P. Elucidating the Effects of a Rare-Earth Oxide Shell on the Luminescence Dynamics of Er3+:Y2O3 Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 10333–10340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hari Krishna, R.; Nagabhushana, B.M.; Nagabhushana, H.; Suriya Murthy, N.; Sharma, S.C.; Shivakumara, C.; Chakradhar, R.P.S.J. Effect of Calcination Temperature on Structural, Photoluminescence, and Thermoluminescence Properties of Y2O3:Eu3+ Nanophosphor. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 1915–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, Z.; Yu, L.; Wang, Q.; Tao, Y.; Yang, H. Effect of Eu,Tb codoping on the luminescent properties of Y2O3 nanorods. J. Lumin. 2011, 131, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Park, J.-H.; Back, N.G.; Hong, K.-S.; Kim, C.-S.; Yoo, D.-H.; Kwak, M.G.; Han, J.-I.; Sung, J.-H.; Moon, B.K.; Seo, H.-J. Annealing effect on photoluminescence intensity of Eu-doped Y2O3 nanocrystals. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2005, 47, S368–S371. [Google Scholar]
  14. Li, R.; Zi, W.; Li, L.; Zhang, J.; Zou, L.; Gan, S. Monodisperse and hollow structured Y2O3:Ln3+ (Ln = Eu, Dy, Er, Tm) nanospheres: A facile synthesis and multicolor-tunable luminescence properties. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 617, 498–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Atabaev, T.S.; Hwang, Y.-H.; Kim, H.-K. Color-tunable properties of Eu3+-and Dy3+-codoped Y2O3 phosphor particles. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2012, 7, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Khachatourian, A.M.; Golestani-Fard, F.; Sarpoolaky, H.; Vogt, C.; Vasileva, E.; Mensi, M.; Popov, S.; Toprak, M.S. Microwave synthesis of Y2O3:Eu3+ nanophosphors: A study on the influence of dopant concentration and calcination temperature on structural and photoluminescence properties. J. Lumin. 2016, 169, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Som, S.; Sharma, S.K. Eu3+/Tb3+-codoped Y2O3 nanophosphors: Rietveld refinement, bandgap and photoluminescence optimization. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2012, 45, 415102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Boukerika, A.; Guerbous, L. Annealing effects on structural and luminescence properties of red Eu3+-doped Y2O3 nanophosphors prepared by sol–gel method. J. Lumin. 2014, 145, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, L.; Jia, H.; Yu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Du, P.; Xi, Z.; Jin, D. Optimization of the Photoluminescence Properties of Electrodeposited Y2O3 : Eu3 + Thin-Film Phosphors. Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 2009, 12, E20–E22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xiao, Y.; Wu, D.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, N.; Liu, J.; Jiang, K. Nano-sized Y2O3:Eu3+ hollow spheres with enhanced photoluminescence properties. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 5755–5760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mueller, R.; Madler, L.; Pratsinis, S.E. Nanoparticle synthesis at high production rates by flame spray pyrolysis. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2003, 58, 1969–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. De Mello, J.C.; Wittmann, H.F.; Friend, R.H. An improved experimental determination of external photoluminescence quantum efficiency. Adv. Mater. 1997, 9, 230–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the structure of RE-doped (a) active core and (b) active core@passive shell.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the structure of RE-doped (a) active core and (b) active core@passive shell.
Nanomaterials 11 01563 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of the RE-doped Y2O3 for different annealing temperatures at 450, 500, 550 °C. (a) 0.05 mM of Eu3+-doped Y2O3 core, (b) 0.05 mM of Tb3+-doped Y2O3 core and (c) 0.05 mM of Dy3+-doped Y2O3 core, and (d) FWHM of RE (Eu, Tb and Dy)-doped Y2O3 at 450, 500, 550 °C.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of the RE-doped Y2O3 for different annealing temperatures at 450, 500, 550 °C. (a) 0.05 mM of Eu3+-doped Y2O3 core, (b) 0.05 mM of Tb3+-doped Y2O3 core and (c) 0.05 mM of Dy3+-doped Y2O3 core, and (d) FWHM of RE (Eu, Tb and Dy)-doped Y2O3 at 450, 500, 550 °C.
Nanomaterials 11 01563 g002
Figure 3. SEM and TEM images (a) Y2O3 NP core sintered at 550℃ for 3 h, (b) Eu-doped Y2O3 NP active core with a passive Y2O3 shell, (c) Tb-doped Y2O3 NP active core with a passive Y2O3 shell, (d) Dy-doped Y2O3 NP active core with a passive Y2O3 shell. The inset TEM images show the coating thickness of each sample.
Figure 3. SEM and TEM images (a) Y2O3 NP core sintered at 550℃ for 3 h, (b) Eu-doped Y2O3 NP active core with a passive Y2O3 shell, (c) Tb-doped Y2O3 NP active core with a passive Y2O3 shell, (d) Dy-doped Y2O3 NP active core with a passive Y2O3 shell. The inset TEM images show the coating thickness of each sample.
Nanomaterials 11 01563 g003
Figure 4. Luminescence spectra of (a) 0.05 mMol% Eu:Y2O3, (b) 0.05 mMol% Tb:Y2O3,, and (c) 0.05 mMol% Dy:Y2O3 nanophosphors.
Figure 4. Luminescence spectra of (a) 0.05 mMol% Eu:Y2O3, (b) 0.05 mMol% Tb:Y2O3,, and (c) 0.05 mMol% Dy:Y2O3 nanophosphors.
Nanomaterials 11 01563 g004
Figure 5. (a) Variation of emission intensity with annealing temperature at 450, 500, 550 °C, (b) Variation of emission intensity with concentration at 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20 mMol%, (c) Variation of quantum yield with annealing temperature at 450, 500, 550 °C, and (d) Variation of quantum yield with concentration at 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20 mMol% in RE3+ (Eu, Tb, Dy)-doped nanophosphors.
Figure 5. (a) Variation of emission intensity with annealing temperature at 450, 500, 550 °C, (b) Variation of emission intensity with concentration at 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20 mMol%, (c) Variation of quantum yield with annealing temperature at 450, 500, 550 °C, and (d) Variation of quantum yield with concentration at 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20 mMol% in RE3+ (Eu, Tb, Dy)-doped nanophosphors.
Nanomaterials 11 01563 g005
Figure 6. XRD patterns of the RE-doped Y2O3 core coated with Y2O3 passive shell via different annealing temperatures at 450, 500, 550 °C. (a) An amount of 0.05 mM of Eu3+-doped Y2O3 core with a Y2O3 passive shell, (b) 0.05 mM of Tb3+-doped Y2O3 core with a Y2O3 passive shell and (c) 0.05 mM of Dy3+-doped Y2O3 core with a Y2O3 passive shell, and (d) FWHM of RE (Eu, Tb and Dy)-doped Y2O3 core with a Y2O3 passive shell at 450, 500, 550 °C.
Figure 6. XRD patterns of the RE-doped Y2O3 core coated with Y2O3 passive shell via different annealing temperatures at 450, 500, 550 °C. (a) An amount of 0.05 mM of Eu3+-doped Y2O3 core with a Y2O3 passive shell, (b) 0.05 mM of Tb3+-doped Y2O3 core with a Y2O3 passive shell and (c) 0.05 mM of Dy3+-doped Y2O3 core with a Y2O3 passive shell, and (d) FWHM of RE (Eu, Tb and Dy)-doped Y2O3 core with a Y2O3 passive shell at 450, 500, 550 °C.
Nanomaterials 11 01563 g006
Figure 7. Relative luminescence spectra of the RE-doped Y2O3 core and Y2O3 passive shell-coated Y2O3:RE core. (a) Relative luminescence spectra of 0.10 mM of Eu3+-doped Y2O3 core and Y2O3:Eu@Y2O3, (b) relative luminescence spectra of 0.05 mM of Tb3+-doped Y2O3 core and Y2O3:Tb@Y2O3, (c) relative luminescence spectra of 0.05 mM of Dy3+-doped Y2O3 core and Y2O3:Dy@ Y2O3. All the core samples were annealed at 550 °C for 3 h and passive shells were annealed at 750 °C for 3 h.
Figure 7. Relative luminescence spectra of the RE-doped Y2O3 core and Y2O3 passive shell-coated Y2O3:RE core. (a) Relative luminescence spectra of 0.10 mM of Eu3+-doped Y2O3 core and Y2O3:Eu@Y2O3, (b) relative luminescence spectra of 0.05 mM of Tb3+-doped Y2O3 core and Y2O3:Tb@Y2O3, (c) relative luminescence spectra of 0.05 mM of Dy3+-doped Y2O3 core and Y2O3:Dy@ Y2O3. All the core samples were annealed at 550 °C for 3 h and passive shells were annealed at 750 °C for 3 h.
Nanomaterials 11 01563 g007
Figure 8. Relative quantum yield spectra of the RE-doped Y2O3 core and Y2O3 passive shell-coated Y2O3:RE core. (a) Relative quantum yield of 0.10 mM of Eu3+-doped Y2O3 core and Y2O3:Eu@Y2O3, (b) relative quantum yield of 0.05 mM of Tb3+-doped Y2O3 core and Y2O3:Tb@ Y2O3, (c) relative quantum yield of 0.05 mM of Dy3+-doped Y2O3 core and Y2O3:Dy@ Y2O3. All the core samples were annealed at 550 °C for 3 h and passive shells were annealed at 750 °C for 3 h.
Figure 8. Relative quantum yield spectra of the RE-doped Y2O3 core and Y2O3 passive shell-coated Y2O3:RE core. (a) Relative quantum yield of 0.10 mM of Eu3+-doped Y2O3 core and Y2O3:Eu@Y2O3, (b) relative quantum yield of 0.05 mM of Tb3+-doped Y2O3 core and Y2O3:Tb@ Y2O3, (c) relative quantum yield of 0.05 mM of Dy3+-doped Y2O3 core and Y2O3:Dy@ Y2O3. All the core samples were annealed at 550 °C for 3 h and passive shells were annealed at 750 °C for 3 h.
Nanomaterials 11 01563 g008
Table 1. Structural parameters of the RE3+-doped nanophosphors.
Table 1. Structural parameters of the RE3+-doped nanophosphors.
SampleAnnealing Temperature (°C)Crystallite Size, D (nm)Reference
Debye–ScherrerHall–Williamsons
Y2O3:Eu45023 Present work
50025
55034
Y2O3:Tb45022
50021
55031
Y2O3:Dy45030
50019
55030
Y2O3:Tb500 15[17]
Y2O3:Eu500 18[18]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hyun, J.-Y.; Kim, K.-H.; Kim, J.-P.; Im, W.-B.; Linganna, K.; Choi, J.-H. Enhancement of Luminescence Efficiency of Y2O3 Nanophosphor via Core/Shell Structure. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1563. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061563

AMA Style

Hyun J-Y, Kim K-H, Kim J-P, Im W-B, Linganna K, Choi J-H. Enhancement of Luminescence Efficiency of Y2O3 Nanophosphor via Core/Shell Structure. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(6):1563. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061563

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hyun, Jae-Young, Ki-Hyun Kim, Jae-Pil Kim, Won-Bin Im, Kadathala Linganna, and Ju-Hyeon Choi. 2021. "Enhancement of Luminescence Efficiency of Y2O3 Nanophosphor via Core/Shell Structure" Nanomaterials 11, no. 6: 1563. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061563

APA Style

Hyun, J. -Y., Kim, K. -H., Kim, J. -P., Im, W. -B., Linganna, K., & Choi, J. -H. (2021). Enhancement of Luminescence Efficiency of Y2O3 Nanophosphor via Core/Shell Structure. Nanomaterials, 11(6), 1563. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11061563

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop