1. Introduction
For the past few decades, nanomaterials have received particular attention for luminescence and photonic device application due to their interesting characteristics including high surface-to-volume ratio and the quantum confinement effect. When compared to bulk materials, these nanosized phosphors exhibit considerable modifications in the structure that include size, morphology, and crystallinity. Thus, in particular, rare earth-doped luminescent nanomaterials have been paid much attention as they play an important role in the luminescent devices such as displays, light emitting diodes, biological assays, and optoelectronics [
1,
2,
3,
4]. Rare-earth ions in a nanoscale host material are particularly interesting because of their unique properties such as luminescence in all spectral ranges from UV to IR, narrow emission linewidths, longer lifetime, and high quantum efficiency. Of the different sesquioxides, yttrium oxide (Y
2O
3) has been studied widely as a host material for rare earth ion doping in photonics and optoelectronics because of its thermo-mechanical properties, optical transparency (0.2–8 μm), and thermodynamically stable crystal structures. In addition, Y
2O
3 has a relatively low annealing temperature (400 °C), high refractive index (~1.8), and low maximum phonon energy (380 cm
−1), which make it a very promising host material for the production of efficient luminescent media, as well as for infrared ceramics [
5]. Moreover, Y
2O
3 can be doped with different types of RE ions to produce strong luminescence over a wide range of wavelengths due to similarities in the atomic radii, crystal structure, and lattice constant of rare earth ions [
6,
7]. Among the rare earth ions, the Eu
3+, Tb
3+ and Dy
3+ are particularly interesting for display device applications as they emit the luminescence in the visible region of red, green, and blue arising from the 4f–4f transitions, respectively.
In order to enhance the luminescence efficiency, it is necessary to control the phosphor size and crystallinity. In view of the above importance, numerous studies have been focused on different methods to synthesize nanocrystalline phosphor particles with different size and morphology, such as solid state reaction, spray pyrolysis, co-precipitation, sol–gel, solution combustion, hydrothermal, etc. Of the wet chemical methods, the molten salt synthesis technique has been used to produce single-phase nanoparticles at low processing temperature with a short duration reaction time and less residual filths. It is found that the rare earth-doped phosphors have shown a decrease in luminescence as the size of these particles changes to the nanoscale from the microscale due to the presence of parasitic surface quenching sites or partial diffusion of rare earth ions in host lattices, high rare earth dopant concentrations, and energy transfer to adjacent ions, that can quench the luminescence of rare earth ions in nanoparticles [
8].
Therefore, it has been demonstrated that the passive shell layer around the core can reduce the surface OH
− groups’ absorption and undesirable energy transfer between dopant ions, resulting increase in the luminescence properties [
9,
10]. The structure of the RE-doped active core as shown in the schematic diagram (see
Figure 1a). As can be seen from
Figure 1a, the optically active core directly interacts with the surface hydroxyl groups that can quench the luminescence intensity and lifetime of active core. A.K. Parchur et al. [
9] and Dorman et al. [
10] reported that the effect of the surface hydroxyl groups could be controlled by developing a passive shell layer around the core. The passive shell coated RE-doped active core is shown in the schematic diagram (
Figure 1b). The core–shell nanostructures are used to increase the luminescence efficiency by removing the surface quenching sites. The purpose of the passive shell is to increase the distance between the surface quenching site and the doped ions in the core.
Thus, in the present work, RE3+ (Eu, Tb, Dy)-doped Y2O3 nanophosphors with passive shells were fabricated by the molten synthesis method and sol–gel processes and their structural, morphological and luminescence properties studied with core–shell modification for the enhancement of luminescence efficiency.
3. Results and Discussion
Figure 2a–c show the diffraction patterns of the as-prepared and RE
3+-doped Y
2O
3 nanophosphors annealed at different temperatures and were obtained by X-ray diffractometer under the same experimental conditions. The XRD spectra showed a distinctive peaks and clearly indicate crystalline nature even for the as-prepared Y
2O
3 sample. The observed diffraction peaks are indexed to (211), (222), (400), (440), and (622) of cubic Y
2O
3 and matched to the JCPDS card no. 41–1105. This indicated that the as-prepared and RE
3+-doped nanoparticles have the characteristic Y
2O
3 cubic structure with space group of
Ia3. A strong peak at 2θ = 29.5° was observed, attributed to the plane (222). Similar behavior has been reported elsewhere [
11,
12,
13,
14,
15]. An annealing process was performed for the RE
3+-doped nanophosphors in order to disperse the RE ions into the lattice and in turn to increase the total luminescence of the nanoparticles. The samples were annealed in the range from 450 to 550 °C for 3 h. The position of the diffraction peaks was not changed with the applied annealing temperature and confirm the presence of single cubic crystalline structure of RE-doped Y
2O
3 nanoparticles.
Figure 2d depicts the variation of peak width (FWHM) as a function of annealing temperature varied from 450 to 550 °C in RE
3+-doped Y
2O
3 nanophosphors. It can be observed that the XRD peaks become narrower on annealing the samples at higher temperatures. Based on the narrowing of the diffraction peaks, it can be concluded that the size of the crystallites increases. An indication of crystallinity increase could be flattening of the amorphous hump (if present) or possibly lowering of the baseline. The crystallize size (D) of RE
3+-doped nanophosphors can be estimated from the well-known Debye–Scherrer’s equation shown below [
16],
where λ is the wavelength of the X-ray source (1.5406 Å), β is the full width at half maximum of intense diffraction peak (222) in the XRD pattern, and θ is the Bragg diffraction angle. The crystallite size of the RE
3+-doped nanophosphors annealed at different temperatures was calculated using the Scherrer’s equation and tabulated in
Table 1. It was noted that the crystallite size of the nanophosphors increased as the annealing temperature increased from 450 °C to 550 °C. The crystallite size of the present nanophosphors calculated from the Scherrer’s equation was compared to the crystallite size of the RE
3+-doped nanophosphors determined from the Hall–Williamsons equation as shown in
Table 1.
The morphology of the synthesized undoped and RE
3+-doped nanophosphors was analyzed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM) techniques.
Figure 3a–d show the SEM images of undoped Y
2O
3 and RE
3+-Y
2O
3 (RE = Eu, Tb, and Dy) nanophosphors. It is noticed that the resultant nanoparticles are in a spherical shape and uniform with an average size of approximately 100~150 nm. The inset of
Figure 3a–d shows the TEM images of the undoped Y
2O
3 and Y
2O
3:RE
3+ (RE = Eu, Tb, and Dy) nanophosphors. The change in mass ratio of the YCl
3 raw material and Y
2O
3 core can control the shell layer thickness deposited around the core. TEM images confirmed the thickness of the core–shell nanoparticles. It is found that the surface of Y
2O
3 nanoparticles have irregular shell structures. It is worth mentioning that the exact thickness of the shell layer is difficult to determine from the TEM images due to slight contrast at core–shell interface.
Figure 4a shows the luminescence spectra of 0.05 mMol%Eu
3+:Y
2O
3 nanophosphor, obtained under 254 nm excitation, respectively. As can be seen from the figure, the luminescence spectra exhibited emission lying between 580 nm and 700 nm originating from the
5D
0 →
7Fj (j = 0–3) transitions of the Eu
3+ ion. Among the emission peaks, the strongest peak at 611 nm and a less intense peak at 630 nm attributed to the
5D
0→
7F
2 electric-dipole hypersensitive transition of Eu
3+ ion in the yttrium oxide host and its intensity is sensitive to the environment, while the weak emission peaked at 580 nm corresponds to the
5D
0 →
7F
0 transition. The weak emission in the region 587–600 nm corresponds to the
5D
0 →
7F
1 magnetic-dipole transition of Eu
3+ ion. Generally, the emission band at 611 nm can show strong emission when Eu
3+ is located at a lower symmetry (without an inversion center), whereas the emission of magnetic dipole transition at 590 nm is stronger when Eu
3+ is located at a higher symmetry (with an inversion center). From the emission spectrum of Eu
3+ ion, it is clearly indicated that the Eu
3+ ions are situated at lower symmetry as the emission at 611 nm corresponding to the
5D
0→
7F
2 transition is dominant. From the emission spectrum in
Figure 4a, it is confirmed that Eu
3+ ions are preferably situated at crystallographic site without inversion center (C
2) [
19].
Figure 4b depicts the emission spectrum of Y
2O
3:0.05 mMol% Tb
3+, obtained under 280 nm excitation. The luminescence spectrum exhibits its strongest peaks at around 545 nm (green emission), and a weak peak centered at 583 nm attributed to the
5D
4→
7F
5, and
5D
4→
7F
4 transitions of Tb
3+ ion, respectively.
Figure 4c displays the luminescence spectrum of the Dy
3+-doped Y
2O
3 nanophosphors, obtained under an excitation wavelength of 350 nm. As can be seen from the emission spectrum of the Tb
3+ ion, it is observed that the Dy
3+ ion exhibits strong blue emission at around 472 nm attributed to the
4F
9/2 →
6H
15/2 transition of the Dy
3+ ion (magnetic-dipole transition, insensitive to the local environment).
Based on the reported literature, it can be noticed that the RE
3+ ion’s luminescence is often improved by thermal treatment. In this study, the effect of the annealing temperature on the luminescence properties of nanophosphors was investigated. The RE
3+-doped Y
2O
3 nanophosphors were annealed in the temperature range from 450 to 550 °C.
Figure 5a shows the variation of the luminescence intensity of RE
3+-doped Y
2O
3 nanophosphor in the dependence of annealing temperature. It was found that the emission intensity of Eu
3+ ion increased with the increase in annealing temperature due to the improvement of crystallite size in the Y
2O
3 nanophosphors. The same trend was observed in Eu
3+-doped Y
2O
3 nanoparticles synthesized by the other methods [
11,
18,
20]. The variation of emission intensity in Tb
3+-doped Y
2O
3 nanophosphors in the dependence of annealing temperature as shown in
Figure 5a. The emission intensity of Tb
3+ ions at the green region increased with the increase in annealing temperature which changed from 450 to 550 °C. The trend of emission intensity in the dependence of annealing temperature could be due to a reduction in surface OH groups and the improvement of crystallite size of the nanophosphors.
Figure 5a shows the variation of emission intensity for different annealing temperatures in Dy
3+-doped Y
2O
3 nanophosphors. No considerable variation in the emission intensity for the annealed Dy
3+-doped nanophosphors. This indicates that the Dy
3+ environment was not changed with annealing temperature.
The effect of Eu
3+ ions concentration on luminescence properties in Y
2O
3 nanophosphors was investigated as shown in
Figure 5b. The emission intensity of Eu
3+-doped Y
2O
3 nanophosphors (at 611 nm) increased with the increase in Eu
3+ concentration up to 0.1 mol% and then decreased for further increase in Eu
3+ ion concentration. The optimum Eu doping concentration in Y
2O
3 nanophosphor was obtained as 0.1 mol%. The enhanced intensity can be attributed to the increased luminescence active centers, while it decreased for higher Eu doping due to energy transfer through the cross-relaxation mechanism: Eu
3+ (
5D
1) + Eu
3+ (
7F
0) → Eu
3+ (
5D
0) + Eu
3+ (
7F
1) [
21].
Figure 5b shows the emission intensity of Tb
3+-doped Y
2O
3 nanophosphor with varying concentration. As the concentration of Tb
3+ increases, the luminescence intensity decreases in the synthesized nanphosphors. The trend of the Tb
3+ ion emission intensity with respect to concentration due to the energy transfer through the cross-relaxation mechanism between neighboring Tb
3+ ions: Tb
3+ (
5D
3) + Tb
3+ (
7F
6) → Tb
3+ (
5D
4) + Tb
3+ (
7F
0). The intensity of the Dy
3+ characteristic transition was not changed considerably with respect to the Dy
3+ concentration varied from 0.05 to 0.2 mol% as shown in
Figure 5b.
The photoluminescence QY of RE
3+-doped Y
2O
3 nanophosphors was analyzed for different annealing temperatures and RE
3+ ion concentrations as shown in
Figure 5c,d. In the case of Eu
3+-doped Y
2O
3 nanophosphor, the QY increased when the annealing temperature varied from 450 to 550 °C. When we consider the concentration, QY initially increases up to 0.1 mol% and then decreases after further increase in concentration up to 0.2 mol%. This illustrates the importance of considering different concentrations. The QY of Y
2O
3:Tb
3+ and Y
2O
3:Dy
3+ nanophosphors showed slight variation when annealing temperature and concentration varied as illustrated in
Figure 5c,d.
Figure 6a–c show the diffraction patterns of the as-prepared and RE
3+-doped Y
2O
3 core with Y
2O
3 passive shell nanophosphors annealed in the temperature range from 450 to 550 °C. From the figure, it is clear that the similar XRD patterns are observed for RE
3+-doped Y
2O
3 core with Y
2O
3 passive shell nanophosphors when compared to the core nanoparticles. This indicates that the RE
3+-doped nanoparticles exhibited a Y
2O
3 cubic crystal structure even with RE doping, a core–shell structure and annealed at different temperatures.
Figure 6d presents the variation of FWHM with respect to the annealing temperature for the RE
3+-doped Y
2O
3 core with Y
2O
3 passive shell. It is observed that the FWHM of RE
3+-doped Y
2O
3 core with Y
2O
3 passive shell were analogous to the RE
3+-doped Y
2O
3 core nanoparticles. The crystallite size of the nanophosphors was also improved with the core–shell nanostructure.
The 0.10 mMol% of Eu
3+, 0.05 mMol% of Tb
3+, and 0.05 mMol% of Dy
3+-doped Y
2O
3 samples were chosen to compare the luminescence properties of RE
3+-doped Y
2O
3 cores and RE
3+-doped Y
2O
3 cores with Y
2O
3 passive shells as they exhibited the optimum luminescence intensity.
Figure 7 definitively shows that the core–shell phosphors revealed a higher peak intensity as compared to the core nanoparticles due to increase in distance between surface quenching sites and RE
3+ active ions. After the passive shell coating, the QY was also measured for the RE
3+-doped core–shell nanoparticles along with RE
3+-doped core nanoparticles (see
Figure 8). Variation in emission intensity (
Figure 4 and
Figure 5a,b) is qualitative. In order to perform quantitative measurement, the photoluminescence quantum yield (QY) (based on integrated sphere) was carried out for the synthesized RE
3+-doped nanophosphors with a core–shell structure. The photoluminescence QY is defined as the ratio of number of photons emitted to the number of photons absorbed. All of the reflected and emitted light can be collected where the concern regarding the angular dependence of the photoluminescence emission is no longer needed by implementing integrating sphere into photoluminescence QY measurements. Mello et al. [
22] developed an equation for the determination of absolute photoluminescence QY as shown below,
with
In the above equations, Ein(λ) and Eout(λ) are the integrated luminescence as a result of direct excitation and secondary excitation of the sample, respectively. The latter emission is due to reflected excitation light from sphere walls hitting the sample. Xempty(λ) is the integrated excitation profile with the empty sphere. α is the sample absorbance. The product of the photoluminescence QY and absorption coefficient reveals the brightness of a photoluminescent nanoparticle of the material. The absorption is an intrinsic characteristic of the material, while photoluminescence QY depends on the architecture of the nanoparticle and its immediate environment. It is widely accepted that core/shell engineering of RE-doped nanophosphors allows researchers to substantially improve the photoluminescence QY of the nanophosphors and subsequently their brightness, by means of an optically undoped passive layer. Safeguarding the emission intensity by a passive layer is attained by spatially separating the optically active core from the structural surface defects at the core interface. It can be seen that the QY increased significantly after shell coating in the Y2O3:Eu3+ nanophosphor. No considerable variation was noticed in the case of Y2O3:Tb3+ and Y2O3:Dy3+ nanophosphors.