Next Article in Journal
A Review on Current Designation of Metallic Nanocomposite Hydrogel in Biomedical Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Nanoarchitectonics for Ultrathin Gold Films Deposited on Collagen Fabric by High-Power Impulse Magnetron Sputtering
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ultra-Sensitive Photo-Induced Hydrogen Gas Sensor Based on Two-Dimensional CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO Heterojunction Nanocomposite

1
School of Science, Computing and Engineering Technologies, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia
2
World Research Hub Initiative (WRHI), School of Materials and Chemical Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1, Ookayama, Meguro-Ku, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(10), 1628; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12101628
Submission received: 11 April 2022 / Accepted: 6 May 2022 / Published: 10 May 2022

Abstract

:
A two-dimensional (2D) CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite has been synthesised via an environmentally friendly, energy efficient, and facile wet chemical procedure and examined for hydrogen (H2) gas sensing application for the first time. The H2 gas sensing performance of the developed conductometric sensor has been extensively investigated under different operational conditions, including working temperature up to 200 °C, UV illumination, H2 concentrations from 50–6000 ppm, and relative humidity up to 30% RH. The developed ceria-based nanocomposite sensor was functional at a relatively low working temperature (100 °C), and its sensing properties were improved under UV illumination (365 nm). The sensor’s response towards 6000 ppm H2 was drastically enhanced in a humid environment (15% RH), from 172% to 416%. Under optimised conditions, this highly sensitive and selective H2 sensor enabled the detection of H2 molecules down to 50 ppm experimentally. The sensing enhancement mechanisms of the developed sensor were explained in detail. The available 4f electrons and oxygen vacancies on the ceria surface make it a promising material for H2 sensing applications. Moreover, based on the material characterisation results, highly reactive oxidant species on the sensor surface formed the electron–hole pairs, facilitated oxygen mobility, and enhanced the H2 sensing performance.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Amongst all the clean energy sources, hydrogen (H2) is an alternative renewable source used in the carbon-neutral hydrogen technologies that can replace traditional energy sources, such as fossil fuels, to avoid carbon emissions, air pollution, and climate change [1]. Therefore, due to the growing economic demand and energy consumption, H2 is now being used in different industries to produce green energy and power for mobile and stationary applications [1,2]. Across the H2 supply chain—from generation, transportation, storage, and ultimate use—care must be taken to ensure the safe handling of this volatile fuel [3]. H2 gas is lighter than air and tends to accumulate in enclosed spaces from even small leaks. Its broad explosive range (4 to 75%), minimal ignition energy (0.017 mJ), and near colourless flame present significant hazards even under a small-scale leakage [4]. Thus, there is a critical need for the subsequent development of H2 sensing and measurement techniques that are accurate, robust, real-time, power efficient, and scalable for deployment over large spatial scales to accommodate critical data for safe, effective, and efficient H2 production, storage, and usage [1]. Many semiconducting materials are used for conductometric H2 sensing, including graphene-based materials, transition metal dichalcogenides, and metal oxides [5,6]. Many different sensing technologies have been developed for H2 sensing [7,8,9] and semiconductor-based H2 sensors mainly present high sensitivity, quick response, and good stability based on their physical and electrochemical characteristics [10,11,12,13,14]. Commonly, the exceptional physical, optical, and electrical properties of 2D semiconductors, such as high surface to volume ratios and numerous active sites, lead to promising gas sensing performance (i.e., gas selectivity, excellent response, durability, and quick response and recovery) because of a change in charge density concentration near or on the sensing layer [15,16,17,18].
Moreover, graphene-based H2 sensors can be considered suitable devices at low operating temperatures based on their excellent electrochemical stability, low resistance, and high charge carrier mobility [16,19]. However, the absence of a direct bandgap and few dangling bonds on the sensing surface result in slow recovery and poor selectivity [20]. Therefore, hybridising graphene-based materials with metal oxides and/or functionalising them with noble metals can enhance the gas sensing performance by facilitating the dissociation of the gas molecules into the sensing surface and forming a dipole layer [21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Moreover, based on the literature, UV illumination can considerably improve the recovery and response of the sensors [16,28,29]. Inspired by these studies, in this work, we combined rGO nanosheets (NSs) with Pd nanoparticles (NPs) to improve the electrocatalytic activities using an environmentally friendly and efficient technique to prevent spontaneous agglomeration of rGO NSs [30,31]. The conventional reduction technique limits the anchor sites on rGO for Pd NPs growth in addition to creating toxic and hazardous chemical residues that are damaging to the environment on a large scale [32]. Therefore, we utilised dopamine (DA), which was proved to be a green chemical for GO reduction and functionalisation to reduce the GO NSs and form a self-polymerised polydopamine (PDA) coating to prevent rGO agglomeration due to the loss of oxygen functional groups. The PDA modified rGO NSs were further functionalised with Pd NPs, to form a Pd-PDA/rGO nanocomposite [31,33].
Meanwhile, rare earth metal oxides, including ceria (CeO2), have attracted considerable attention in gas sensing applications due to their electrical conductivity, oxygen storage capacity, and oxygen deficiency [34,35,36]. Ceria is an exceedingly versatile material that has recently been used in different applications, including environmental gas monitoring, based on its excellent resistance to chemical corrosion, electrical and optical properties, non-toxicity, thermal stability, safety, and reliability [37]. More importantly, having a number of electrons in its 4f subshell results in significant oxygen mobility, a remarkable oxygen release/storage capability [38], and the unique redox reaction between Ce4+ and Ce3+ valence states [39], which enhances its gas sensing properties [40].
Although pure ceria has shown poor gas sensing performance because of its wide bandgap (3.1 eV), which requires more energy to excite the electrons to the conduction band, and is functional mainly at high temperatures [41], the modified hybrid structures of ceria have been recently used to detect CO [42], H2S [43], NO2 [35], H2O2 [44], C2H5OH [36], CS2 [45], and C3H6O [46]. However, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, there have been no studies on the H2 sensing properties of 2D ceria-based sensors, which is considered to be the initial motivation for this work. In addition, the use of ceria in the presence of noble metals (Pd, Pt, and Au) and hybridising with reduced graphene oxide can form heterojunctions between the material as well as act as a heterogeneous catalyst that enhances either oxidation or hydrogenation reactions [47,48,49]. Especially, Pd NPs have proved to be the best noble metal for H2 gas sensing due to their facilitation of the adsorption and diffusion of H2 molecules into the sensing layer and the production of PdHx species [50]. Furthermore, Ma et al. [51] reported the H2 adsorption capability of ceria, which can play a significant role in the overall efficiency of its H2 gas sensing application [40].
Herein, this work reports the development of a photoreactive semiconducting 2D CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite for H2 gas sensing with enhanced performance at a relatively low working temperature (100 °C). It is worth mentioning that the developed sensor is also functional at room temperature (30 °C). The synthesis technique, material characterisation, and H2 sensing mechanisms of the developed 2D CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite are fully explained. The experimental results confirm the potential application of 2D CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite as a high-performance H2 gas sensing device.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Material Synthesis Procedure and Gas Sensor Fabrication

Commercially produced graphene oxide (GO) powder was obtained from JCNano Inc. Advanced Materials Supplier, Nanjing, China, and the 2D cerium oxide (CeO2) dispersion was purchased from 2D Semiconductors Inc. (Scottsdale, AZ, USA); the concentration was 0.15 mg/mL and the size was less than 100 nm. All the other materials used for the synthesis of CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite, (dopamine hydrochloride (DA), palladium (II) chloride (PdCl2), and sodium borohydride (NaBH4)), were bought from Sigma-Aldrich, NSW, Australia. Figure 1 demonstrates the schematic diagram of an environmentally friendly and facile synthesis technique for the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite [31,33]. At the start, the GO NSs (10 mg) were mixed in 30 mL of Tris buffer (pH 8.5) and sonicated for 1 h. Then, 10 mg of DA was added to the suspension and sonication was continued until DA was fully dissolved. Later, the mixture was put under vigorous shaking conditions for 24 h. The GO was reduced and functionalised with polydopamine (PDA) through these steps via the self-polymerisation process. The DA initiates self-polymerisation to form polydopamine (PDA) in the presence of GO oxygen functional groups in a weak alkaline environment, with the catechol groups undergoing oxidation until producing the quinone groups, resulting in the reduction of GO [31,33].
Afterwards, the synthesised PDA/rGO nanocomposite was sonicated, centrifuged, and washed several times with deionised water (DI). Then, DI water (3 mL) and 1 mL of PdCl2 solution (5 mg/mL) were added to 1 mL of PDA/rGO (1 mg/mL) and mixed for 2 h. Next, 1 mL of freshly made NaBH4 solution (0.5 M) was added to the mixture and stirred for 5 h. The mixture was then centrifuged and washed 3 times with DI water in order to collect the final product, the Pd-PDA/rGO nanocomposite [33]. Then, 0.5 mL of DI was added to the Pd-PDA/rGO nanocomposite powder to form a homogeneous suspension. Afterwards, 1 µL of Pd-PDA/rGO dispersion (1 mg/mL) was drop-casted onto 10 × 6 mm gold interdigitated electrode fingers with a spacing of ~10 µm as a first layer of the sensor. Finally, 1 µL of CeO2 (0.15 mg/mL) dispersion was drop-casted on top of the Pd-PDA/rGO as the second layer to make the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite sensor device.

2.2. Material Surface Characterisation

The structural and morphological characteristics of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO nanocomposite were analysed using different techniques. The scanning electron microscope (EBL-SEM) (Raith150 Two, Raith Germany Co., Ltd., Dortmund, Germany), the high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM) JEOL ARM200F’ NeoARM’ (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at 200 kV, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscope (EDS) (TESCAN MIRA3 FEG-SEM combined with Thermo Scientific UltraDry EDS, ThermoFisher Scientific, Melbourne, VIC, Australia) were used to investigate the surface morphology and elemental composition of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite. An X-ray diffractometer (D8-Advanced, Bruker Corporation, Bremen, Germany) with Cu Kα and λ = 1.54 Å at 40 kV and 20 mA over the range of 5–95 degrees was applied to determine the crystal phases of the material. Raman spectroscopy (Renishaw plc, Gloucestershire, UK), using 514.5 nm laser excitation, was utilised to measure the Raman spectra of the material.

2.3. Gas Sensing Measurements

A gas sensing system [16] was used to examine the gas sensing properties of the conductometric CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite-based sensor under different operational conditions. The utilised gas sensing system consists of various parts, including six mass flow controllers (GE50A MFCs) for the regulation of the gas concentrations, temperature and humidity-controlled Linkam stage (T96, Linkam Scientific Instruments Ltd. Tadworth, UK), a built-in heater (LNP96), a Keithly Piccoammeter (model 6487) to periodically measure interval currents throughout the experiments, a humidity generator, and a UV LED (365 nm, M365D1 LED, with 8.9 µW/mm2 power-driven with a current of 700 mA), which was installed on top of the Linkam stage. The sensor was tested under different working conditions, including temperatures from RT (30 °C) up to 200 °C, relative humidity from 0 to ~30% RH at 100 °C, and H2 concentration from 50 to 6000 ppm. Before each experiment, the sensors were left in pure air for 1 h before the gas exposure. The air/gas mixture flow rate was set at 200 sccm and the target gas exposure time for each experiment was 15 min, followed by two hours of purging for the recovery. For the experiments in the humid condition, the humidity was introduced to the system from the beginning of the experiments and settled for 1 h before gas exposure. The long-term stability and gas selectivity of the sensor were also investigated. The sensor was exposed to 50 ppm of various gases, including hydrogen, nitrogen dioxide, methane, ammonia, and acetone. A bias voltage of 1 V was applied throughout the experiments, and the resistivity change in the sensor was measured upon exposure to the target gas. The response of the sensor (R) was calculated towards the target gas as follows [52,53,54]:
R = R g R a × 100
where Ra is the sensor’s resistivity in air and Rg is the sensor’s resistivity in contact with the target gas. The response and recovery times were calculated when the sensor reached 90% of its response and recovery (back to its initial baseline). Three similar sensors were fabricated for this work, and their gas sensing performance was evaluated. Each experiment was repeated at least three times under the exact operating conditions to validate the reliability and repeatability of the gas sensing process. The gas sensing results of all prepared sensors were comparable.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Material Characterisation Analysis

The morphology and surface structure of the 2D CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite have been analysed by SEM at different magnifications, as shown in Figure 2. The SEM images show the homogeneous distribution of Pd NPs with an average crystalline size of <13 nm and small nanoclusters and the heterogeneous distribution of 2D ceria nanoclusters. When the particle size is small, the surface area increases, resulting in the presence of more active atoms on the surface and consequently more oxygen vacancies accompanied by lattice strain [55]. The lattice parameter is higher for the smaller particle size of CeO2 due to the higher concentration of oxygen vacancies and their associated Ce3+ for ceria particles [55]. The porous and multi-layered structure of the PDA functionalised rGO can be seen, which confirms the PDA/rGO NSs are interconnected with some folded edges. Moreover, Figure 2b,c indicate that the PDA/rGO NSs are wrinkled and crumpled, showing the good distribution of the Pd NPs and ceria on both sides of the PDA/rGO NSs and the absence of significant agglomerations.
Elemental composition and surface coverage of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite were investigated using EDS and presented in Figure 3. The EDS spectrum (Figure 3f) confirms that the sample (drop-casted on Si substrate) is composed of five elements of carbon, oxygen, palladium, cerium, and Si (substrate). In addition, Figure 3b–e illustrates the scattering of each component on the surface, which confirms the formation of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite.
The XRD analysis of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite is shown in Figure 4 to signify its degree of crystallinity. The XRD profile confirmed a relatively broad peak at 2θ = 27.3° corresponding to the (002) graphitic plane of the partially restacked rGO NSs with the intralayer spacing of 0.326 nm between the rGO NSs, calculated from Bragg’s law (2), as shown below:
λ = 2 dsin θ
where the λ (equals 0.154 nm) is the X-ray beam wavelength, θ is the diffraction angle, and d is the intralayer spacing between the rGO NSs. Subsequently, the Scherrer Equation (3) was used to calculate the graphene layers number in rGO NSs to be less than three layers, as follows:
X = K λ β · cos θ
where the X is the number of rGO layers, K is a dimensionless shape factor, λ is the X-ray beam wavelength, β is the line broadening at half the maximum intensity (FWHM), and θ is the Bragg angle.
From the XRD pattern, the high-intensity diffraction peaks observed at 2θ = 28.6, 32.9, 47.3, 56.7, and 69.4 attributed to the (111), (200), (220), (311), and (400) crystalline planes of CeO2, respectively, which was a very good fit with the JCPDS data card No. 43-1002 [35]. The results confirm the hexagonal structure of the CeO2, which is consistent with the HRTEM results that are presented later in this section. The other sharp peaks at 2θ = 38.55, 44.15, 64.7, and 77.7 are attributed to the (111), (200), (222), and (311) lattice planes of Pd NPs, respectively, which are a good fit to the JCPDS DATA CARD No. 5-681. This result indicates the face-centred cubic (FCC) structure of the Pd NPs inside the rGO NSs [33]. Hydrogen adsorption selectivity of the sensing material is highly correlated to the morphology-dependent oxygen reducibility and oxygen vacancy concentrations [56]. Given that, different morphologies of CeO2 possess unique catalytic behaviour corresponding to the specific surface characteristics of each particular lattice plane [57,58]. For instance, the predominant (111) crystal plane is responsible for the selective hydrogenation reaction due to the lowest surface energy and highest oxygen vacancy concentration [59]. In addition, the H2 molecules occupying the oxygen vacancies on the sensor’s surface can improve the photocatalytic activity of the material due to the enhanced optical absorption and the bandgap states [48,60].
Raman analysis of the 2D ceria, Pd-PDA/rGO, and CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite was carried out using a 514 nm laser spectrometer and presented in Figure 5. Raman spectroscopy provides information about the structural transformation of the material and can detect the formation of defects inside the material. Generally, the oxygen vacancies on the surface of ceria are produced due to the reversible reduction of Ce4+ to Ce3+, based on the defect chemistry [61]. The concentration of oxygen vacancy is a critical element in the gas sensing characteristics of the ceria. As shown in Figure 5, the Raman spectrum of CeO2 shows a sharp peak at ~465 cm−1 corresponding to the F2g mode of symmetric Ce-O8 stretching vibration in the Oh group, which is sensitive to any disorder in the oxygen sublattice [62]. It can be considered a symmetric breathing mode of six oxygen atoms around the central cerium ion. The results confirm the hexagonal shape of the ceria, which is consistent with the TEM results. A small peak at ~265 cm−1 can be ascribed to the second-order transverse acoustic mode (2TA). 2D bands can be seen near ~2769 cm−1 and ~2969 cm−1, which are slightly shifted to higher wavenumbers in comparison with the 2D band of the Pd-PDA/rGO and CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite (~2730 cm−1 and ~2923 cm−1) due to the layer thickness increase [63]. The Raman spectrum of the Pd-PDA/rGO shows two characteristic peaks at ~1355 cm−1 and ~1605 cm−1 ascribed to the D and G bands, while the D and G bands of CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO are slightly shifted to the lower wavenumbers (~1352 cm−1 and 1601 cm−1), due to the formation of heterojunction between the ceria and Pd-PDA/rGO, and charge transfer [64]. The presence of D and G bands in two spectra also confirms that the Pd-PDA/rGO NSs structure has been maintained after combining with ceria. The D band is correlated with the density of defects in the sp2 material, and the G band corresponds to the active E2g phonon mode of the graphite’s symmetric structure [65,66]. However, the intensity of the D and G bands of the composite material is downshifted due to the electron transfer from the ceria to rGO NSs, confirming the formation of heterojunctions between ceria and Pd-PDA/rGO NSs, which is consistent with the TEM results [64]. The comparison of the Raman spectra of the pure ceria and CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO nanocomposite reveals that the F2g mode (Ce-O8 vibration unit) is shifted to the lower wavenumber (~446 cm−1) due to the strong interaction between the ceria Pd-PDA/rGO NSs forming the structural defects, such as oxygen vacancies, which facilitate the charge transfer from the ceria to the rGO NSs [67]. The 2D bands are broadened for the nanocomposite, indicating exfoliation of the rGO [67]. In addition, the Raman spectrum of the nanocomposite confirms that the ceria is successfully incorporated into the Pd-PDA/rGO NSs. The defect density on the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite and Pd-PDA/rGO NSs can be calculated by the intensity ratio (ID/IG) of the D band to G band, which is increased by loading the ceria to the Pd-PDA/rGO NSs. The ID/IG for Pd-PDA/rGO NSs and CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO nanocomposite were found to be 0.99 and 1.1, respectively, which reflects the higher defect density in the nanocomposite and greater oxygen vacancies on the nanocomposite surface.
Crystal structural features and internal morphology of 2D CeO2 and CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite were investigated by HRTEM, as shown in Figure 6. Figure 6a,b displays the HRTM images of the 2D CeO2 in different magnifications, confirming transparency and the 2D structure of the CeO2 and the existence of well-defined polycrystalline hexagonal structured CeO2 (111), (200), (220), (311), and (400) planes with interplanar spacings of 0.334, 0.272, 0.192, 0.162, and 0.135 nm, respectively. Likewise, Figure 6c,d demonstrates a few layers of transparent and thin film-like structure of the PDA-rGO NSs decorated with the Pd NPs and 2D CeO2. It can be seen that the Pd NPs are uniformly dispersed onto PDA/rGO NSs surface with a nearly spherical shape, and CeO2 is heterogeneously dispersed into PDA/rGO NSs with some agglomerations. These images prove that the distribution and morphology of the 2D CeO2 and Pd NPs into the PDA-rGO NSs are consistent with the SEM images. The lattice fingers of the Pd NPs planes can be seen in Figure 6d. The interplanar spacings of 0.233, 0.205, 0.144, and 0.122 nm are ascribed to the cubic Pd (111), Pd (200), Pd (222), and Pd (311) lattice planes, respectively. According to Bragg’s law (Equation (2)), the XRD pattern of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite is consistent with the obtained crystal structural features by HRTEM. As shown in Figure 6c,d, the PDA/rGO NSs are relatively thin layers that help to support the Pd NPs and nanoclusters and 2D CeO2 to form the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite.

3.2. H2 Gas Sensing Description

The effect of different operating conditions, including H2 concentration (50–6000 ppm), working temperature (30–200 °C), UV (365 nm) illumination, and relative humidity (up to 30% RH) on the H2 sensing performance of the 2D CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite sensor was investigated, respectively, and reported in the following sections.

3.2.1. Effect of Operating Temperature on the H2 Sensing Performance

The gas sensing properties of semiconductor sensors are greatly dependent on the operating temperature due to the direct relation with their chemo-resistive adsorption-desorption behaviour and, more importantly, the association with power consumption and cost of experiment [68]. Therefore, to optimise the operating temperature as a key element in gas sensing valuation, the dynamic response of the fabricated CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO sensor towards H2 with different concentrations (200–600 ppm) was examined at different working temperatures (30 °C up to 200 °C) and 0% relative humidity (% RH) in the dark environment (Figure 7). As shown in Figure 7, the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO sensor behaves as a p-type semiconductor, where its resistivity increases upon exposure to H2 (reducing gas) due to the charge transfer from the target gas molecules to the sensing layer [3]. The electrons move from H2, as an electron donor gas, to the valence band of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO nanocomposite, which reduces the hole concentration on the surface and, as a result, its conductivity.
The 2D CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite-based sensor has shown promising H2 sensing responses at low operating temperatures in dark conditions, as shown in Table 1. However, a baseline drift happens due to partly irreversible gas/material chemisorption, indicating that the sensor is not fully recovered to its baseline. This is resolved by introducing UV radiation and changing the charge carrier density on the surface of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO by stimulating the electrons from the valence band.
The change in resistivity of the sensor upon exposure to H2 gas at different concentrations was measured throughout the experiment. Based on the acceleration of the adsorption/desorption kinetics between the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO nanocomposite and H2 molecules, the sensor’s responses were enhanced by increasing the operating temperature from 30 °C up to 100 °C [6,69,70]. The maximum sensor response at 600 ppm H2 was 114% at 100 °C; thus, the 100 °C was chosen as the optimum working temperature. By further increasing the operating temperature above 100 °C, the sensing responses gradually reduced due to the Langmuir effect, where the desorption rate of H2 molecules exceeds its adsorption rate on the surface of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO nanocomposite [57]. In addition, by increasing the temperature beyond the optimum, the adsorbed H2 molecules on the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO nanocomposite surface might escape before the charge transfer due to the high activation, resulting in a poor response [71].

3.2.2. Effect of UV Radiation on the H2 Sensing Performance

The UV radiance effect on H2 sensing performance of the 2D CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite-based sensor was investigated at 100 °C and 0% RH as a function of H2 concentration. Figure 8 compares the dynamic response of the sensor upon exposure to H2 with different concentrations (200–600 ppm) at 100 °C and 0% RH without and with UV (365 nm) illumination. The resistivity change depends on the adsorption/desorption rates of the H2 molecules onto the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO sensing layer, which is correlated to the H2 concentrations [72]. By increasing the gas concentration, the number of gas molecules interacting with the surface of the sensing layer rises until the adsorption and desorption reach a balanced state [73]. Figure 8 compares the dynamic response of the sensor in the dark and under UV illumination, which indicates that the sensor was not fully recovered to its original baseline in the dark. However, the sensor is fully recovered by introducing the UV, and no drift has happened in the baseline. These results reveal that the interaction between the H2 molecules and the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO sensing layer under UV radiation is fully reversible [12,74,75].
The UV photoexcitation weakens the bonding forces between the H2 molecules and CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO nanocomposite sensing layer throughout the physisorption, leading to reversible adsorption/desorption processes [74,76,77]. Moreover, UV illumination stimulates the electrons from the valence band of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO surface [78]. It changes the charge carrier density on its surface and consequently accelerates the adsorption of H2 molecules by these photogenerated electrons from the pre-adsorbed ambient oxygen species [78]. As shown, the oxygen vacancies play a significant role in the photocatalytic activities and adsorption behaviour in semiconducting metal oxides, including CeO2, due to the creation of isolated levels below the conduction band [79]. In addition, ceria is a photocatalyst with a 4f electron configuration, which improves its adsorption capacity, especially under UV illumination. When exposed to H2 as a reducing agent, the electrons transfer into the Ce4f orbitals and consequently to oxygen, forming superoxide anion radicals [40]. In other words, under UV illumination, highly reactive oxidant species including °OH, HO2°, and O2° can be produced on the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite surface, resulting in electron–hole pair formation, i.e., where the electrons are excited from the valence band to the conduction band, leaving holes in the valence band [80]. These photoproduced electron–hole pairs migrate to the surface, giving rise to the reduction reaction of the electron acceptor (O2) to active oxygen (°O2) and the holes oxidise H2 (the electron donor), forming hydroxyl radicals and/or H2O. The active °O2 and OH° facilitate the oxidisation of the adsorbed H2 molecules, improving its H2 sensing performance [81].
The response values of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO sensor without and with UV illumination at 100 °C and 0% RH were analysed for each experiment at different H2 concentrations (200–600 ppm) and reported in Table 2.
Table 2 confirms an enhancement in the H2 sensing responses of the sensor under UV radiation, which can be attributed to the reduction in the adsorption energy barrier between the H2 molecules and the photo-induced sensing layer [82]. In addition, the wide bandgap of ceria (3.1 eV) needs UV illumination to enhance its photocatalytic reaction, resulting in increased numbers of oxygen vacancies in the CeO2 lattice and Ce3+ ions on the surface [83]. Therefore, increasing the number of H2 molecules occupying the oxygen vacancies on the sensor’s surface improves the sensor’s gas sensing activity based on the UV light effect of shifting the ceria’s bandgap and accelerating the adsorption rate [48,60]. However, the gas sensing mechanism of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite based-sensor is complicated and cannot be generalised due to various physical and chemical adsorption/desorption interactions, such as π-π interactions, van der Waals forces, oxygen molecule adsorption/desorption, formation of different chemical bonds, and charge transfer between the H2 molecules and the sensing layer [70,84].

3.2.3. Relative Humidity Effect on the H2 Sensing Performance

The above discussed H2 sensing parameters of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO nanocomposite sensor was investigated under dry ambient conditions. One of the critical environmental elements affecting the H2 sensing parameters is relative humidity (% RH) [85]. Water molecules in humid environments contribute to the adsorption/desorption mechanism, influencing physisorption and chemisorption processes [76,86]. Therefore, we studied the effect of the humid environment, changing from a dry ambient up to 30% RH, on the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO sensing parameters at different H2 concentrations and 100 °C. All experiments were performed under UV (365 nm) illumination.
Table 3 presents all the calculated H2 sensing response magnitudes of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO sensor towards H2 concentrations of 4000 and 6000 ppm at different % RH. As indicated in Table 3, the sensor’s responses are improved by raising the H2 concentration from 4000 to 6000 ppm. The sensing mechanism of the p-type CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction conductometric sensor is based on ion-sorption of H2 molecules, followed by a charge transfer directly between the H2 molecules and heterostructure-based CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO that produces a variation in the Fermi level (i.e., change in the electrical conductivity). The presence of more H2 molecules on the surface facilitates the electron transfer from the H2, as an electron donor gas, to the valence band of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO nanocomposite, decreasing the hole concentration on the surface and improving the response.
It can also be seen that the response magnitude increases by enriching the % RH up to 15%, which may be due to the participation of water molecules in physical and chemical adsorption/desorption reactions [87]. The water molecules act as electron donors, so by increasing the humidity percentage, the number of adsorbed water molecules increases on the surface, resulting in a narrowing of the depletion region and an increase in the sensor’s resistance [87,88]. This reaction leads to an enhancement in gas sensing response for the p-type CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO sensor.
Moreover, carbonyl and hydroxyl functional groups on the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO nanocomposite surface facilitate its interaction with water molecules, consequently changing the conductivity [89]. On the other hand, the surface-adsorbed active oxygen species play a significant role in the H2 sensing performance. The interaction between the oxygen species on the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO surface and adsorbed H2 molecules can form the hydroxyl active sites, improving the response [90].
Table 3 also reveals that the response magnitude declines by further elevating the humidity up to 30%. With increasing the % RH beyond 15%, the excess water molecules on the surface cause widening of the bandgap by breaking the material sublattice and symmetry (especially the rGO), which leads to a change in conductivity and a reduction in the response [91]. Moreover, in an environment with a high humidity level, the water molecules cannot be readily adsorbed on the surface of the sensing layer because the size of water molecules is greater than H2 molecules [85]. Therefore, the response of the sensor decreases.
Table 4 compares the calculated H2 sensing parameters of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO sensor, including response magnitude and response and recovery times towards H2 with various concentrations at 0 and 15% RH.
It can be seen that by raising the H2 concentration, the response of the sensor increases, which can be attributed to the increased number of H2 molecules interacting with the sensor, enhancing its adsorption rate on the surface of the sensing layer. This continues until the sensor becomes saturated and the adsorption and desorption rate reach a balance.
As shown in Table 4, the maximum response of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO sensor was 172% in dry ambient conditions towards 6000 ppm H2 at 100 °C under UV radiation. However, the sensor response drastically improved, to 416%, by raising the humidity to 15% RH under the same operational conditions. This can be attributed to the competition between the H2 and water molecules to be adsorbed on the sensing layer’s surface [75,92]. The H2O molecules participate in the adsorption process in the humid environment, influencing the chemisorption and physisorption sensing mechanisms [6,76,92]. In addition, the high response of the sensor and its sensing improvement in a humid environment can be due to the hydroxylation reaction of the water molecules and the reaction between the hydrogen and oxygen ions ( O a d s 2 and O a d s ) on the sensing layer surface [93].
Table 4 also reveals that response and recovery times of the sensor were improved by introducing 15% RH. Quick response and recovery of 70 s and 180 s were observed when the sensor was exposed to 6000 ppm H2 at 100 °C and 15% RH under UV due to the high permeability of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO sensor to water molecules.
Figure 9a demonstrates the dynamic response of the sensor at 0% and 15% RH at H2 with different concentrations and 100 °C. Figure 9b,c compares the response and recovery times trends while increasing the humidity and H2 concentrations.
Comparing these dynamic responses reveals that a slight drift happens when the sensor is functioning at 0% RH, showing that the sensor doesn’t fully recover, which affects the response. It could be because of some irreversible chemisorption reactions due to the high number of H2 molecules interacting with the sensing surface at high H2 concentrations. However, when the sensor operated at 15% RH, it is fully recovered to its original baseline after each H2 exposure as a result of the presence of H2O molecules.
In a humid environment, the response is improved because of the presence of hydroxyl active sites (as electron donors) on the surface, which enhances the electric charge density by forming the hydronium cations from the ionised H2O molecules as in [76,86]:
2H2O ↔ OH + H3O+
In addition, it is observed that by increasing the H2 concentration from 2000 to 6000 ppm, the response and recovery become quicker due to an increase in the surface coverage rate, accelerating the adsorption/desorption process of the H2 molecules [70]. Moreover, the sensor reaches its saturation level quicker when exposed to higher H2 concentrations. Another critical element affecting the fast response and recovery is the formation of the covalent bonds on the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO sensing layer because of the participation of the hydroxyl and carbonyl groups in the H2 physisorption and chemisorption reactions and also their interactions with water molecules on the surface [94]. The H2O molecules are known as electron donors, facilitating the ionisation of the OH and COOH functional groups on the sensing layer surface to generate a concentration gradient of protons [22]. This gradient induces the diffusion of the protons to the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO nanocomposite, carrying the voltage and current in the external circuit that accelerates the response [95,96].

3.2.4. Gas Selectivity and Sensor Stability

Gas selectivity of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO sensor was examined at 0% RH and optimum operating temperature of 100 °C and displayed in Figure 10a. The sensor was exposed to 50 ppm of H2, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), acetone (C3H6O), ammonia (NH3), and methane (CH4) for 30 min. It can be seen that the sensor was highly responsive to H2 in comparison with the other gases. The sensor showed a 136% response to H2 while indicating a low response towards NH3 (1.4%), C3H6O (2.6%), and CH4 (3.2%). Although the sensor showed a 38% response to NO2, it was more selective and responsive to H2.
The p-type CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO nanocomposite sensing mechanism is mainly based on the charge transfer from the H2 gas to the sensing material along with the adsorption/desorption interactions of the H2 molecules with the oxygen active sites on the surface [34,97,98]. The free electrons on the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO nanocomposite surface interact with oxygen molecules in the air to produce reactive oxygen species (O2−, O2, and O) ions. These reactive ions interact with the H2 molecules as an electron donor gas, improving the electron charge transfer to the sensing layer, lowering the hole concentration, and rising resistivity [3,34,99]. As mentioned before, the H2 adsorption selectivity of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO is highly correlated to its morphology due to oxygen vacancy concentrations [56]. Therefore, the presence of the CeO2 (111) facet facilitates the selective hydrogenation reaction based on its lowest surface energy and highest oxygen vacancy concentration [59]. The CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO sensor was repeatedly tested over seven months at 100 °C and 0% RH towards 6000 ppm H2. Figure 10b indicates comparable responses of the sensor over time, confirming its long-term stability and lack of significant degradation.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

An environmentally friendly wet chemistry procedure was used to synthesise the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite, and its H2 gas sensing behaviour was thoroughly investigated under different working conditions, including temperature up to 200 °C, H2 concentration from 50–6000 ppm, UV radiation, and relative humidity up to 30% RH. The fabricated p-type sensor performed rapidly with a maximum response of 172% towards 6000 ppm H2 at the optimum operating temperature of 100 °C in dry ambient conditions, due to the enhanced number of H2 molecules interacting with the sensing material, accelerating the adsorption/desorption rate on the surface until a balanced state is reached. The heterostructured CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO nanocomposite also showed an excellent response, of 416%, to 6000 ppm H2 at 15% RH and 100 °C, with high selectivity compared to other gases. This could be attributed to the high volume to surface area ratio of the hybrid sensing material along with the presence of defects on the surface related to oxygen vacancies, as well as the heterojunction interface between the rGO, Pd NPS, and 2D ceria, which leads to additional reaction sites [100]. The surface physical characteristics of the sensor confirmed a heterogeneous distribution of the 2D CeO2 and Pd NPs onto the PDA/rGO nanosheets. In addition, the multi-layered porous structure of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO nanocomposite improved its H2 gas sensing characteristics. The sensor efficiently exhibited a high response of 136% at a low concentration (50 ppm) of H2.
The gas sensing mechanisms of hybrid nanocomposites are still under debate. Many surface characteristics can influence the gas sensing performance, including the grain size, crystal orientation, surface thickness, and lateral dimension, which require further systematic studies on the hybridisation impact on the material’s physical, chemical, and electrical characteristics, consequently improving the sensing properties.
However, for p-type conductometric gas sensors in contact with reducing gas, the primary sensing mechanism is based on molecular adsorption and chemisorption of the oxygen species on the surface followed by a charge transfer from the reducing gas molecules to the heterostructure nanocomposite leading to a change in the Fermi level and electrical resistance [24]. The surface morphology and particle size of the materials also influence the H2 sensing properties. As mentioned before, the grain size highly affects the activity of the sensing layer and the oxygen vacancies on the surface. When the particle size decreases, the surface area and the available active atoms on the surface increase, i.e., more oxygen vacancies accompanied by lattice strain [55]. When the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO nanocomposite is exposed to H2 as a reducing gas, Ce3+ is generated through the reduction of Ce4+ by the electron left behind due to oxygen vacancies. Therefore, as the concentration of oxygen vacancies increases, the CeO2 lattice parameter rises [55]. In addition, hybridising the Pd decorated rGO NSs with ceria in the form of the p–n heterojunction nanocomposite has shown a promising influence on the H2 sensing performance at a low operating temperature (100 °C) with enhanced sensing properties compared to a Pd-rGO sensor [16] and ceria sensor [39].
Table 5 compares the H2 sensing parameters of the present work with different graphene-based materials functionalised by noble metals and/or metal oxides and pure CeO2. The adsorbed oxygen species on the sensing surface react with H2 and form H2O molecules, as shown below:
H2 → 2H°
2 H° (ads) + O (ads) → H2O + e
Since ceria is an n-type semiconductor with a bandgap of 3.1 eV, the presence of UV light reduces its bandgap and activates its photocatalytic reactions. On the other hand, when ceria is exposed to a reducing gas such as H2, it releases oxygen, forming suboxides as follows [40]:
CeO2 + xH2 ↔ CeO2−x + xH2O + xV
where V is an oxygen vacancy. Doping the ceria with noble metals such as Pd can lower the reduction temperature, while generally, the reduction requires high temperatures [101]. Doping the ceria also introduces a lattice strain that weakens Ce-O bonds, which reduces oxygen vacancy formation energy and, consequently, alters oxygen ion diffusion [101]. In addition, a further beneficial effect is the formation of Pd-O-Ce bonds in the interface, which are proposed as the active sites on Pd/CeO2 where chemisorbed H2 reacts with lattice oxygen [102,103]. In this process, at the optimum temperature, the PdO/Pd phase transforms to Pd-O-Ce, allowing the Pd NPs to adsorb H2 at low temperatures [103]. Consequently, there is a synergic effect between ceria and Pd, which helps the reducibility of the Pd at a low temperature due to the formation of active interfacial sites [37]. This synergic effect also benefits the material’s durability due to the Pd NPs anchoring to the support with Pd-O-Ce bonds [103].
On the other hand, when the CeO2(111) is exposed to H2 gas, the H atoms sit on top of the O atoms on the surface, forming hydroxyl O-H bonds [104]. The adsorption of H atoms on the ceria surface leads to the reduction of Ce ions based on the electron transfer from the H 1s to Ce 4F orbital [104]. Therefore, the reduced Ce ions can trap the H2 and increase the response. Hybridising CeO2 with rGO also affected the sensing performance via the formation of a p–n heterojunction between the rGO and CeO2 and also the appearance of C-O bonding at the interface between rGO and ceria. In summary, the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite can produce highly reactive oxidant species including °OH, HO2°, and O2° under UV illumination, where the electrons are excited from the valence band to the conduction band, leaving holes in the valence band. This results in the formation of photoproduced electron–hole pairs, which can migrate to the surface, giving rise to the reduction reaction by adsorbed H2 molecules on its surface.
The H2 adsorption selectivity of the sensing material is highly correlated to the morphology-dependent oxygen reducibility and oxygen vacancy concentrations [56]. Given that, different morphologies of CeO2 possess unique catalytic behaviour corresponding to the specific surface characteristics of each particular lattice plane [57,58]. For instance, the predominant (111) crystal plane is responsible for the selective hydrogenation reaction due to the lowest surface energy and highest oxygen vacancy concentration [59]. In addition, the H2 molecules occupying the oxygen vacancies on the sensor’s surface can improve the photocatalytic activity of the material due to the enhanced optical adsorption and the bandgap states [48,60].
More importantly, one of the critical parameters influencing the H2 sensing performance is the adsorption of atmospheric H2O molecules as a significant source of interference [17,26]. According to the literature, the effect of humidity on the gas sensing parameters is a complex challenge for most resistive H2 sensors [17,105,106]. However, fabricating H2 sensors capable of detecting H2 in a humid environment is necessary for real-world operating conditions [107]. Therefore, the effect of the % RH on the H2 sensing performance of the 2D CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite-based sensor was investigated in this study. The response of the sensor was drastically enhanced from 172% to 416% by increasing the humidity to 15% at 6000 ppm H2 and 100 °C under UV light. The response and recovery times also improved from 90 s to 70 s and 660 s to 180 s, respectively. This result can be ascribed to increasing the charge carriers on the sensing layer surface by enriching the % RH because of the adsorbed ionised water molecules. Water is known as a reducing agent and transfers electrons to the sensing layer. In a humid environment, the following reactions can happen:
OH + h+(valent band) ↔ °OH
H2O + h+(valent band) ↔ °OH + H+
OH + h+(valent band) ↔ °OH
O2 + e(conduction band) ↔ HO2°
While exposed to H2O molecules, the transition of electrons into the Ce4f orbitals and ambient oxygen develops highly reactive oxidant species including °OH, HO2°, and O2° on the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO surface, forming the electron–hole pairs and improving the sensing performance of the material [80,84].
Table 5. Summarising H2 sensing parameters of different graphene-based materials functionalised by noble metals and/or metal oxides and a pure CeO2 compared with this work.
Table 5. Summarising H2 sensing parameters of different graphene-based materials functionalised by noble metals and/or metal oxides and a pure CeO2 compared with this work.
Base MaterialHybrid MaterialSynthesis MethodH2 Conc. (ppm)Temp.
(°C)
RH (%)Response (%)Response Time (s)Recovery Time (s)
rGO [108]WO3- Pd NPsHydrothermal100RT-3852155
rGO [109]SnO2- Pd NPsMicrowave synthesis10,000RT-376
rGO [110]NiOFreeze drying10,00050-0.6428142
Graphene [111]Pd NPs-SiO2Thermal CVD500RT-4.1213600
rGO [16]Pd NPsWet chemistry50001001018.21701440
rGO [112]Pd-PtHummers’ method, Hydrothermal800025-0.52300600
rGO [109]Pt-SnO2Hummers’ method, Hydrothermal5000RT-332
CeO2 [39]-Wet chemistry100400-2420660
CeO2 [39]Pd NPsWet chemistry100350-1960360
PDA/rGO (this work)Pd NPs- 2D CeO2Wet chemistry60001001541670180
As shown in Table 5, the H2 gas sensing parameters of the developed 2D CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO nanocomposite-based sensor are more promising in comparison with the reviewed literature, including pure ceria, Pd-rGO, and metal oxide-doped rGO sensors. Based on the experimental results, reducing the GO by adding the DA, as an environmentally friendly chemical, considerably improved its reduction process, affecting the sensing performance. Moreover, hybridising the PDA/rGO with Pd NPs and 2D CeO2 suggestively enhanced the H2 sensing parameters [23]. Last, but not least, the fabricated 2D CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite was highly selective to H2 and displayed acceptable durability over seven months, as well as a very high response and quick response and recovery, and ability to function at low operating temperature.

Author Contributions

H.H.: Conceptualisation, methodology, investigation, software, sensor devices fabrications, material characterisations, gas sensing data collection, data analysis, data interpretation and validation, data visualisation, writing—original and final draft preparation. A.Y.: material synthesis, review and editing the draft, S.J. supervision, review and editing the draft, M.S.: main supervision, review and editing the draft, funding acquisition, resources. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This activity received funding from the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA) as part of ARENA’s Research and Development Program—Renewable Hydrogen for Export (Contract No. 2018/RND012). This research was supported by using the Nectar Research Cloud, a collaborative Australian research platform supported by the NCRIS-funded Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC). S.J. is grateful for financial support via ARC Linkage LP190100505 project.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The views expressed herein are not necessarily the views of the Australian Government, and the Australian Government does not accept responsibility for any information or advice contained herein. The authors would like to thank Jamie Riches for assistance in obtaining TEM images at the Central Analytical Research Facility (CARF) at QUT. We would like to acknowledge Christopher Harrison and Andrew Moore for their support in developing the gas sensing system at Swinburne.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Caliendo, C.; Russo, P.; Ciambelli, P. 13 Hydrogen safety, state of the art, perspectives, risk assessment, and engineering solutions. Util. Hydrog. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2021, 3, 433. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen, K.-H.; Niu, J.-S.; Liu, W.-C. Study of a New Hydrogen Gas Sensor Synthesized With a Sputtered Cerium Oxide Thin Film and Evaporated Palladium Nanoparticles. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2021, 68, 4077–4083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hashtroudi, H.; Atkin, P.; Mackinnon, I.D.; Shafiei, M. Low-operating temperature resistive nanostructured hydrogen sensors. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 26646–26664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Buttner, W.J.; Post, M.B.; Burgess, R.; Rivkin, C. An overview of hydrogen safety sensors and requirements. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 2462–2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mondal, B.; Gogoi, P.K. Nanoscale Heterostructured Materials Based on Metal Oxides for a Chemiresistive Gas Sensor. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2022, 4, 59–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hashtroudi, H.; Mackinnon, I.D.R.; Shafiei, M. Emerging 2D hybrid nanomaterials: Towards enhanced sensitive and selective conductometric gas sensors at room temperature. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 13108–13126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lang, Z.; Qiao, S.; Ma, Y. Acoustic microresonator based in-plane quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy sensor with a line interaction mode. Opt. Lett. 2022, 47, 1295–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Thorin, E.; Zhang, K.; Valiev, D.; Schmidt, F.M. Simultaneous detection of K, KOH, and KCl in flames and released from biomass using photofragmentation TDLAS. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 42945–42961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ma, Y.; He, Y.; Tong, Y.; Yu, X.; Tittel, F.K. Quartz-tuning-fork enhanced photothermal spectroscopy for ultra-high sensitive trace gas detection. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 32103–32110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hübert, T.; Boon-Brett, L.; Black, G.; Banach, U. Hydrogen sensors—A review. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 157, 329–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, B.L.; Wang, J.; Zou, H.L.; Garaj, S.; Lim, C.T.; Xie, J.; Li, N.B.; Leong, D.T. Low-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Nanostructures Based Sensors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 7034–7056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ilnicka, A.; Lukaszewicz, J.P. Graphene-Based Hydrogen Gas Sensors: A Review. Processes 2020, 8, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pham, T.K.N.; Brown, J.J. Hydrogen Sensors Using 2-Dimensional Materials: A Review. Chem. Sel. 2020, 5, 7277–7297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hashtroudi, H.; Savub, R.; Kumar, R.; Moshkalev, S.; Shafiei, M. Hybrid. Two-Dimensional Nanostructured Hydrogen Gas Sensors; SPIE: Melbourne, Australia, 2019; Volume 11201. [Google Scholar]
  15. Weng, Q.; Li, G.; Feng, X.; Nielsch, K.; Golberg, D.; Schmidt, O.G. Electronic and Optical Properties of 2D Materials Constructed from Light Atoms. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1801600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Hashtroudi, H.; Kumar, R.; Savu, R.; Moshkalev, S.; Kawamura, G.; Matsuda, A.; Shafiei, M. Hydrogen gas sensing properties of microwave-assisted 2D Hybrid Pd/rGO: Effect of temperature, humidity and UV illumination. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 7653–7665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Joshi, N.; Hayasaka, T.; Liu, Y.; Liu, H.; Oliveira, O.N.; Lin, L.J.M.A. A review on chemiresistive room temperature gas sensors based on metal oxide nanostructures, graphene and 2D transition metal dichalcogenides. Microchim. Acta 2018, 185, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hao, L.; Liu, Y.; Du, Y.; Chen, Z.; Han, Z.; Xu, Z.; Zhu, J.J.N.R.L. Highly Enhanced H2 Sensing Performance of Few-Layer MoS2/SiO2/Si Heterojunctions by Surface Decoration of Pd Nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Fang, W.; Yang, Y.; Yu, H.; Dong, X.; Wang, R.; Wang, T.; Wang, J.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, B.; Wang, X. An In2O3 nanorod-decorated reduced graphene oxide composite as a high-response NOx gas sensor at room temperature. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 7517–7523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Varghese, S.S.; Varghese, S.H.; Swaminathan, S.; Singh, K.K.; Mittal, V. Two-Dimensional Materials for Sensing: Graphene and Beyond. Electronics 2015, 4, 651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Shi, J.; Cheng, Z.; Gao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhao, H. Facile synthesis of reduced graphene oxide/hexagonal WO3 nanosheets composites with enhanced H2S sensing properties. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 230, 736–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Luo, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zheng, B.; Geng, X.; Debliquy, M. Hydrogen sensors based on noble metal doped metal-oxide semiconductor: A review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 20386–20397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Anand, K.; Singh, O.; Singh, M.P.; Kaur, J.; Singh, R.C. Hydrogen sensor based on graphene/ZnO nanocomposite. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 195, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Boudiba, A.; Roussel, P.; Zhang, C.; Olivier, M.-G.; Snyders, R.; Debliquy, M. Sensing mechanism of hydrogen sensors based on palladium-loaded tungsten oxide (Pd–WO3). Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 187, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Acharyya, D.; Bhattacharyya, P. Highly efficient room-temperature gas sensor based on TiO2 nanotube-reduced graphene-oxide hybrid device. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 2016, 37, 656–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bindra, P.; Hazra, A. Capacitive gas and vapor sensors using nanomaterials. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 6129–6148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Armgarth, M.; Söderberg, D.; Lundström, I. Palladium and platinum gate metal-oxide-semiconductor capacitors in hydrogen and oxygen mixtures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1982, 41, 654–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Novoselov, K. Nobel lecture: Graphene: Materials in the flatland. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2011, 83, 837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Reddeppa, M.; Park, B.-G.; Kim, M.-D.; Peta, K.R.; Chinh, N.D.; Kim, D.; Kim, S.-G.; Murali, G. H2, H2S gas sensing properties of rGO/GaN nanorods at room temperature: Effect of UV illumination. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 264, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Johnson, J.L.; Behnam, A.; Pearton, S.; Ural, A.J.A.m. Hydrogen Sensing Using Pd-Functionalized Multi-Layer Graphene Nanoribbon Networks. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 4877–4880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xu, L.Q.; Yang, W.J.; Neoh, K.-G.; Kang, E.-T.; Fu, G.D. Dopamine-induced reduction and functionalization of graphene oxide nanosheets. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 8336–8339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Silva, C.; Simon, F.; Friedel, P.; Pötschke, P.; Zimmerer, C. Elucidating the chemistry behind the reduction of graphene oxide using a green approach with polydopamine. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Fu, L.; Lai, G.; Zhu, D.; Jia, B.; Malherbe, F.; Yu, A. Advanced catalytic and electrocatalytic performances of polydopamine-functionalized reduced graphene oxide-palladium nanocomposites. J. ChemCatChem 2016, 8, 2975–2980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dong, X.; Cheng, X.; Zhang, X.; Sui, L.; Xu, Y.; Gao, S.; Zhao, H.; Huo, L. A novel coral-shaped Dy2O3 gas sensor for high sensitivity NH3 detection at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 255, 1308–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hu, J.; Zou, C.; Su, Y.; Li, M.; Ye, X.; Cai, B.; Kong, E.S.-W.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Y. Light-assisted recovery for a highly-sensitive NO2 sensor based on RGO-CeO2 hybrids. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 270, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shruthi, J.; Jayababu, N.; Reddy, M.R. Room temperature ethanol gas sensing performance of CeO2–In2O3 heterostructured nanocomposites. In AIP Conference Proceedings; AIP Publishing LLC: Melville, NY, USA, 2019; p. 030020. [Google Scholar]
  37. Montini, T.; Melchionna, M.; Monai, M.; Fornasiero, P. Fundamentals and catalytic applications of CeO2-based materials. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 5987–6041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Piotrowski, M.J.; Tereshchuk, P.; Da Silva, J.L. Theoretical investigation of small transition-metal clusters supported on the CeO2 (111) surface. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 21438–21446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Van Dao, D.; Nguyen, T.T.; Kim, D.-S.; Yoon, J.-W.; Yu, Y.-T.; Lee, I.-H. Core and dopant effects toward hydrogen gas sensing activity using Pd@ N-CeO2 core–shell nanoflatforms. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2021, 95, 325–332. [Google Scholar]
  40. Bellardita, M.; Fiorenza, R.; Palmisano, L.; Scirè, S. Photocatalytic and photothermocatalytic applications of cerium oxide-based materials. In Cerium Oxide (CeO2): Synthesis, Properties and Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 109–167. [Google Scholar]
  41. Chen, Y.-J.; Xiao, G.; Wang, T.-S.; Zhang, F.; Ma, Y.; Gao, P.; Zhu, C.-L.; Zhang, E.; Xu, Z.; Li, Q.-h. Synthesis and enhanced gas sensing properties of crystalline CeO2/TiO2 core/shell nanorods. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 156, 867–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Al-Kuhaili, M.; Durrani, S.; Bakhtiari, I. Carbon monoxide gas-sensing properties of CeO2–ZnO thin films. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 255, 3033–3039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, Z.; Niu, X.; Lin, Z.; Wang, N.; Shen, H.; Liu, W.; Sun, K.; Fu, Y.Q.; Wang, Z. Hydrothermally synthesized CeO2 nanowires for H2S sensing at room temperature. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 682, 647–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ensafi, A.A.; Mahmoodi, A.; Rezaei, B. Pd@ CeO2-SnO2 nanocomposite, a highly selective and sensitive hydrogen peroxide electrochemical sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 296, 126683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xuan, Y.; Hu, J.; Xu, K.; Hou, X.; Lv, Y. Development of sensitive carbon disulfide sensor by using its cataluminescence on nanosized-CeO2. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2009, 136, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bene, R.; Perczel, I.; Reti, F.; Meyer, F.; Fleisher, M.; Meixner, H. Chemical reactions in the detection of acetone and NO by a CeO2 thin film. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2000, 71, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cargnello, M.; Jaén, J.J.D.; Garrido, J.C.H.; Bakhmutsky, K.; Montini, T.; Gámez, J.J.C.; Gorte, R.J.; Fornasiero, P. Exceptional Activity for Methane Combustion over Modular Pd@CeO2 Subunits on Functionalized Al2O3. Science 2012, 337, 713–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Colussi, S.; Gayen, A.; Farnesi Camellone, M.; Boaro, M.; Llorca, J.; Fabris, S.; Trovarelli, A. Nanofaceted Pd–O Sites in Pd–Ce Surface Superstructures: Enhanced Activity in Catalytic Combustion of Methane. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 8481–8484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Spezzati, G.; Su, Y.; Hofmann, J.P.; Benavidez, A.D.; DeLaRiva, A.T.; McCabe, J.; Datye, A.K.; Hensen, E.J.M. Atomically Dispersed Pd–O Species on CeO2(111) as Highly Active Sites for Low-Temperature CO Oxidation. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 6887–6891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kim, W.; Jang, B.; Lee, H.-S.; Lee, W. Reliability and selectivity of H2 sensors composed of Pd Film nanogaps on an elastomeric substrate. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 224, 547–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ma, D.; Lu, Z.; Tang, Y.; Li, T.; Tang, Z.; Yang, Z. Effect of lattice strain on the oxygen vacancy formation and hydrogen adsorption at CeO2(111) surface. Phys. Lett. A 2014, 378, 2570–2575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shingange, K.; Swart, H.; Mhlongo, G.H. Design of porous p-type LaCoO3 nanofibers with remarkable response and selectivity to ethanol at low operating temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 308, 127670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, Z.; Hu, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhang, X.; Wang, B.; Tian, H.; Wang, Y.; Guan, J.; Gu, H. Fast and highly-sensitive hydrogen sensing of Nb2O5 nanowires at room temperature. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 4526–4532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Akamatsu, T.; Itoh, T.; Masuda, Y.; Shin, W.; Matsubara, I.; Kida, M. Gas sensor properties of nanopore-bearing Co3O4 particles containing Pt or Pd particles. J. Asian Ceram. Soc. 2020, 8, 138–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Hailstone, R.; DiFrancesco, A.; Leong, J.; Allston, T.; Reed, K. A study of lattice expansion in CeO2 nanoparticles by transmission electron microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 15155–15159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhou, K.; Wang, X.; Sun, X.; Peng, Q.; Li, Y. Enhanced catalytic activity of ceria nanorods from well-defined reactive crystal planes. J. Catal. 2005, 229, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nolan, M.; Parker, S.C.; Watson, G.W. The electronic structure of oxygen vacancy defects at the low index surfaces of ceria. Surf. Sci. 2005, 595, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Vilé, G.; Colussi, S.; Krumeich, F.; Trovarelli, A.; Pérez-Ramírez, J. Opposite face sensitivity of CeO2 in hydrogenation and oxidation catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 12069–12072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Liu, X.; Zhou, K.; Wang, L.; Wang, B.; Li, Y. Oxygen vacancy clusters promoting reducibility and activity of ceria nanorods. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3140–3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Tolba, S.A.; Allam, N.K. Computational design of novel hydrogen-doped, oxygen-deficient monoclinic zirconia with excellent optical absorption and electronic properties. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Choudhury, B.; Chetri, P.; Choudhury, A. Oxygen defects and formation of Ce3+ affecting the photocatalytic performance of CeO2 nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 4663–4671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Srivastava, M.; Das, A.K.; Khanra, P.; Uddin, M.E.; Kim, N.H.; Lee, J.H. Characterizations of in situ grown ceria nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide as a catalyst for the electrooxidation of hydrazine. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 9792–9801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Anema, J.R.; Li, J.-F.; Yang, Z.-L.; Ren, B.; Tian, Z.-Q. Shell-Isolated Nanoparticle-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: Expanding the Versatility of Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2011, 4, 129–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Liu, Y.; Wang, F.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, R. Charge transfer at carbon nanotube–graphene van der Waals heterojunctions. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 12883–12886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zhang, B.; Cheng, M.; Liu, G.; Gao, Y.; Zhao, L.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Liu, F.; Liang, X.; Zhang, T.; et al. Room temperature NO2 gas sensor based on porous Co3O4 slices/reduced graphene oxide hybrid. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 263, 387–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Shen, Y.; Lu, S.; Xu, W.; Lv, A.; Wang, Z.; Wang, H.; Liu, G.; Zhang, Y. Fabrication of composite material with pd nanoparticles and graphene on nickel foam for its excellent electrocatalytic performance. Electrocatalysis 2021, 11, 522–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Verma, R.; Samdarshi, S. In situ decorated optimized CeO2 on reduced graphene oxide with enhanced adsorptivity and visible light photocatalytic stability and reusability. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 22281–22290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tonezzer, M.; Iannotta, S. H2 sensing properties of two-dimensional zinc oxide nanostructures. Talanta 2014, 122, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kapoor, A.; Ritter, J.; Yang, R.T. An extended Langmuir model for adsorption of gas mixtures on heterogeneous surfaces. Langmuir 1990, 6, 660–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chauhan, P.S.; Bhattacharya, S. Hydrogen gas sensing methods, materials, and approach to achieve parts per billion level detection: A review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 26076–26099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hu, J.; Sun, Y.; Xue, Y.; Zhang, M.; Li, P.; Lian, K.; Zhuiykov, S.; Zhang, W.; Chen, Y. Highly sensitive and ultra-fast gas sensor based on CeO2-loaded In2O3 hollow spheres for ppb-level hydrogen detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 257, 124–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Rajkumar, K.; Kumar, R.R. Gas Sensors Based on Two-Dimensional Materials and Its Mechanisms. In Fundamentals and Sensing Applications of 2D Materials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 205–258. [Google Scholar]
  73. Du, H.; Xie, G.; Su, Y.; Tai, H.; Du, X.; Yu, H.; Zhang, Q. A new model and its application for the dynamic response of RGO resistive gas sensor. Sensors 2019, 19, 889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Rout, C. Fundamentals and Sensing Applications of 2D Materials; Woodhead Publishing: Duxford, England, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  75. Potje-Kamloth, K. Semiconductor junction gas sensors. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 367–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sharma, R.; Rawal, D. The Physics of Semiconductor Devices: Proceedings of IWPSD 2017; Springer: Delhi, India, 2018; Volume 215. [Google Scholar]
  77. Meng, Z.; Stolz, R.M.; Mendecki, L.; Mirica, K.A. Electrically-Transduced Chemical Sensors Based on Two-Dimensional Nanomaterials. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 478–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Kumar, R.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Kumar, M. Room-Temperature Gas Sensors Under Photoactivation: From Metal Oxides to 2D Materials. Nano-Micro Lett. 2020, 12, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Jiang, D.; Wang, W.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, Z. Insights into the surface-defect dependence of photoreactivity over CeO2 nanocrystals with well-defined crystal facets. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 4851–4858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chen, X.; Shen, S.; Guo, L.; Mao, S.S. Semiconductor-based photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6503–6570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Chen, X.; Mao, S.S. Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: Synthesis, properties, modifications, and applications. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2891–2959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Muckley, E.S.; Nelson, A.J.; Jacobs, C.B.; Ivanov, I.N. Effect of UV irradiation on adsorption/desorption of oxygen and water on carbon nanotubes. In Proceedings of the Organic Photonic Materials and Devices XVIII, San Francisco, CA, USA, 24 February 2016; p. 97451K. [Google Scholar]
  83. Walkey, C.; Das, S.; Seal, S.; Erlichman, J.; Heckman, K.; Ghibelli, L.; Traversa, E.; McGinnis, J.F.; Self, W.T. Catalytic properties and biomedical applications of cerium oxide nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Nano 2015, 2, 33–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Hashtroudi, H.; Yu, A.; Juodkazis, S.; Shafiei, M. Two-Dimensional Dy2O3-Pd-PDA/rGO Heterojunction Nanocomposite: Synergistic Effects of Hybridisation, UV Illumination and Relative Humidity on Hydrogen Gas Sensing. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Moon, J.; Cheng, Y.; Daemen, L.L.; Li, M.; Polo-Garzon, F.; Ramirez-Cuesta, A.J.; Wu, Z. Discriminating the Role of Surface Hydride and Hydroxyl for Acetylene Semihydrogenation over Ceria through In Situ Neutron and Infrared Spectroscopy. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 5278–5287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Chen, Y.; Pei, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Shi, Z.; Xu, J.; Wu, D.; Xu, T.; Tian, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, X. Humidity sensing properties of the hydrothermally synthesized WS2-modified SnO2 hybrid nanocomposite. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 447, 325–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yavari, F.; Koratkar, N. Graphene-based chemical sensors. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 1746–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Dimiev, A.M.; Alemany, L.B.; Tour, J.M. Graphene oxide. Origin of acidity, its instability in water, and a new dynamic structural model. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 576–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Yan, W.; Worsley, M.A.; Pham, T.; Zettl, A.; Carraro, C.; Maboudian, R. Effects of ambient humidity and temperature on the NO2 sensing characteristics of WS2/graphene aerogel. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 450, 372–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Inpaeng, S.; Muangrat, W.; Tedsree, K.; Pfeiler, W.; Chodjarusawad, T.; Issro, C. Effective hydrogen gas sensor based on palladium nanoparticles dispersed on graphene sheets by spin coating technique. Mater. Sci. Pol. 2020, 38, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yao, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhu, J.; Zeng, B.; Wu, Z.; Li, X. The effect of ambient humidity on the electrical properties of graphene oxide films. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2012, 7, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Piloto, C.; Shafiei, M.; Khan, H.; Gupta, B.; Tesfamichael, T.; Motta, N. Sensing performance of reduced graphene oxide-Fe doped WO3 hybrids to NO2 and humidity at room temperature. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 434, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Li, X.; Li, X.; Li, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J. WS2 nanoflakes based selective ammonia sensors at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 240, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Buscema, M.; Island, J.O.; Groenendijk, D.J.; Blanter, S.I.; Steele, G.A.; van der Zant, H.S.J.; Castellanos-Gomez, A. Photocurrent generation with two-dimensional van der Waals semiconductors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 3691–3718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Borini, S.; White, R.; Wei, D.; Astley, M.; Haque, S.; Spigone, E.; Harris, N.; Kivioja, J.; Ryhanen, T. Ultrafast graphene oxide humidity sensors. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 11166–11173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Yang, A.; Wang, D.; Wang, X.; Zhang, D.; Koratkar, N.; Rong, M. Recent advances in phosphorene as a sensing material. Nano Today 2018, 20, 13–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Seiyama, T.; Kato, A.; Fujiishi, K.; Nagatani, M. A new detector for gaseous components using semiconductive thin films. Anal. Chem. 1962, 34, 1502–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Van Toan, N.; Chien, N.V.; Van Duy, N.; Hong, H.S.; Nguyen, H.; Hoa, N.D.; Van Hieu, N. Fabrication of highly sensitive and selective H2 gas sensor based on SnO2 thin film sensitized with microsized Pd islands. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 301, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Voiry, D.; Yang, J.; Chhowalla, M. Recent Strategies for Improving the Catalytic Activity of 2D TMD Nanosheets Toward the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 6197–6206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Liu, Y.; Hao, L.; Gao, W.; Wu, Z.; Lin, Y.; Li, G.; Guo, W.; Yu, L.; Zeng, H.; Zhu, J.; et al. Hydrogen gas sensing properties of MoS2/Si heterojunction. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 211, 537–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Reddy, B.M.; Thrimurthulu, G.; Katta, L. Design of efficient CexM1−xO2−δ (M = Zr, Hf, Tb and Pr) nanosized model solid solutions for CO oxidation. Catal. Lett. 2011, 141, 572–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Liu, H.-H.; Wang, Y.; Jia, A.-P.; Wang, S.-Y.; Luo, M.-F.; Lu, J.-Q. Oxygen vacancy promoted CO oxidation over Pt/CeO2 catalysts: A reaction at Pt–CeO2 interface. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 314, 725–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Hinokuma, S.; Fujii, H.; Okamoto, M.; Ikeue, K.; Machida, M. Metallic Pd nanoparticles formed by Pd–O–Ce interaction: A reason for sintering-induced activation for CO oxidation. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 6183–6190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Vicario, G.; Balducci, G.; Fabris, S.; de Gironcoli, S.; Baroni, S. Interaction of hydrogen with cerium oxide surfaces: A quantum mechanical computational study. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 19380–19385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Hassan, K.; Chung, G.-S. Catalytically activated quantum-size Pt/Pd bimetallic core–shell nanoparticles decorated on ZnO nanorod clusters for accelerated hydrogen gas detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 239, 824–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zhang, J.; Liu, X.; Neri, G.; Pinna, N. Nanostructured Materials for Room-Temperature Gas Sensors. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 795–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Gupta Chatterjee, S.; Chatterjee, S.; Ray, A.K.; Chakraborty, A.K. Graphene–metal oxide nanohybrids for toxic gas sensor: A review. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 221, 1170–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Esfandiar, A.; Irajizad, A.; Akhavan, O.; Ghasemi, S.; Gholami, M.R. Pd–WO3/reduced graphene oxide hierarchical nanostructures as efficient hydrogen gas sensors. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 8169–8179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Russo, P.A.; Donato, N.; Leonardi, S.G.; Baek, S.; Conte, D.E.; Neri, G.; Pinna, N. Room-Temperature Hydrogen Sensing with Heteronanostructures Based on Reduced Graphene Oxide and Tin Oxide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 11053–11057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Ren, H.; Gu, C.; Joo, S.W.; Zhao, J.; Sun, Y.; Huang, J. Effective hydrogen gas sensor based on NiO@rGO nanocomposite. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 266, 506–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Wu, W.; Liu, Z.; Jauregui, L.A.; Yu, Q.; Pillai, R.; Cao, H.; Bao, J.; Chen, Y.P.; Pei, S.-S. Wafer-scale synthesis of graphene by chemical vapor deposition and its application in hydrogen sensing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2010, 150, 296–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Peng, Y.; Ye, J.; Zheng, L.; Zou, K. The hydrogen sensing properties of Pt–Pd/reduced graphene oxide based sensor under different operating conditions. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 24880–24888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the synthesis process of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the synthesis process of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite.
Nanomaterials 12 01628 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of the multi-layered porous structure of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite with wrinkles and open edges at different magnifications. Scale bar: (a) 5 µm, (b) 1 µm, and (c) 500 nm.
Figure 2. SEM images of the multi-layered porous structure of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite with wrinkles and open edges at different magnifications. Scale bar: (a) 5 µm, (b) 1 µm, and (c) 500 nm.
Nanomaterials 12 01628 g002
Figure 3. (a) SEM image and EDS mapping of (b) carbon, (c) oxygen, (d) palladium, and (e) cerium, and (f) EDS spectrum of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite.
Figure 3. (a) SEM image and EDS mapping of (b) carbon, (c) oxygen, (d) palladium, and (e) cerium, and (f) EDS spectrum of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite.
Nanomaterials 12 01628 g003
Figure 4. X-ray analysis of CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite.
Figure 4. X-ray analysis of CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite.
Nanomaterials 12 01628 g004
Figure 5. The Raman spectra of the ceria, (a) CeO2, and (b) Pd-PDA/rGO, and CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO nanocomposite.
Figure 5. The Raman spectra of the ceria, (a) CeO2, and (b) Pd-PDA/rGO, and CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO nanocomposite.
Nanomaterials 12 01628 g005
Figure 6. HRTEM images of the CeO2 (a,b) and CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite (c,d) at low (a,c) and high (b,d) magnifications that indicate the interplanar spacings of 2D CeO2 and Pd NPs.
Figure 6. HRTEM images of the CeO2 (a,b) and CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite (c,d) at low (a,c) and high (b,d) magnifications that indicate the interplanar spacings of 2D CeO2 and Pd NPs.
Nanomaterials 12 01628 g006
Figure 7. P-type semiconducting gas sensing dynamic responses of CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO sensor towards H2 with different concentrations without UV illumination at different working temperatures (a) 30 °C, (b) 100 °C, (c) 150 °C, and (d) 200 °C. (e) Response values at different operating temperatures and H2 concentrations.
Figure 7. P-type semiconducting gas sensing dynamic responses of CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO sensor towards H2 with different concentrations without UV illumination at different working temperatures (a) 30 °C, (b) 100 °C, (c) 150 °C, and (d) 200 °C. (e) Response values at different operating temperatures and H2 concentrations.
Nanomaterials 12 01628 g007
Figure 8. Dynamic response of CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO sensor at 100 °C and 0% RH as a function of H2 concentration, without and with UV illumination.
Figure 8. Dynamic response of CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO sensor at 100 °C and 0% RH as a function of H2 concentration, without and with UV illumination.
Nanomaterials 12 01628 g008
Figure 9. (a) The UV excited dynamic responses of CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO sensor at 100 °C and various H2 concentrations (2000–6000 ppm) in dry ambient conditions and under 15% relative humidity; (b) response times of the sensor at 0 and 15% RH as a function of H2 concentration; (c) recovery times of the sensor at 0 and 15% RH and different H2 concentrations.
Figure 9. (a) The UV excited dynamic responses of CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO sensor at 100 °C and various H2 concentrations (2000–6000 ppm) in dry ambient conditions and under 15% relative humidity; (b) response times of the sensor at 0 and 15% RH as a function of H2 concentration; (c) recovery times of the sensor at 0 and 15% RH and different H2 concentrations.
Nanomaterials 12 01628 g009
Figure 10. (a) Gas selectivity of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO sensor at 100 °C and 0% RH towards different gases at 50 ppm; (b) long-term sensor stability towards 6000 ppm H2 at 100 °C and 0% RH over seven months.
Figure 10. (a) Gas selectivity of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO sensor at 100 °C and 0% RH towards different gases at 50 ppm; (b) long-term sensor stability towards 6000 ppm H2 at 100 °C and 0% RH over seven months.
Nanomaterials 12 01628 g010
Table 1. Hydrogen sensing response of CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite at different operating temperatures and H2 concentrations in the dark.
Table 1. Hydrogen sensing response of CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite at different operating temperatures and H2 concentrations in the dark.
H2 Concentration (ppm)Response (%)
30 °C100 °C150 °C200 °C
200101103102100
300103106103101
400104108104102
500106111106102
600108114108102
Table 2. H2 sensing response of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite sensor towards H2 with different concentrations without and with UV illumination at 100 °C and 0% RH.
Table 2. H2 sensing response of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite sensor towards H2 with different concentrations without and with UV illumination at 100 °C and 0% RH.
H2 Concentration (ppm)200300400500600
Response (%), without UV103106108111114
Response (%), with UV103107111115119
Table 3. H2 sensing response of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO sensor towards 4000 and 6000 ppm H2 at various relative humidity and 100 °C under UV (365 nm) illumination.
Table 3. H2 sensing response of the CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO sensor towards 4000 and 6000 ppm H2 at various relative humidity and 100 °C under UV (365 nm) illumination.
H2 Conc (ppm)Response (%)
0% RH10% RH15% RH20% RH25% RH30% RH
4000160217361225192220
6000172349416373333257
Table 4. Sensing parameters towards H2 different concentrations at 100 °C, 0% RH, and 15% RH under UV (365 nm) illumination.
Table 4. Sensing parameters towards H2 different concentrations at 100 °C, 0% RH, and 15% RH under UV (365 nm) illumination.
H2 Conc (ppm)Response (%)Response Time (s)Recovery Time (s)
0% RH15% RH0% RH15% RH0% RH15% RH
2000127.2193.5780540510210
3000145.6307600420660210
4000160361450210480180
5000168386210150480180
60001724169070660180
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hashtroudi, H.; Yu, A.; Juodkazis, S.; Shafiei, M. Ultra-Sensitive Photo-Induced Hydrogen Gas Sensor Based on Two-Dimensional CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO Heterojunction Nanocomposite. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1628. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12101628

AMA Style

Hashtroudi H, Yu A, Juodkazis S, Shafiei M. Ultra-Sensitive Photo-Induced Hydrogen Gas Sensor Based on Two-Dimensional CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO Heterojunction Nanocomposite. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(10):1628. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12101628

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hashtroudi, Hanie, Aimin Yu, Saulius Juodkazis, and Mahnaz Shafiei. 2022. "Ultra-Sensitive Photo-Induced Hydrogen Gas Sensor Based on Two-Dimensional CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO Heterojunction Nanocomposite" Nanomaterials 12, no. 10: 1628. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12101628

APA Style

Hashtroudi, H., Yu, A., Juodkazis, S., & Shafiei, M. (2022). Ultra-Sensitive Photo-Induced Hydrogen Gas Sensor Based on Two-Dimensional CeO2-Pd-PDA/rGO Heterojunction Nanocomposite. Nanomaterials, 12(10), 1628. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12101628

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop