Next Article in Journal
Top-Down Production of Nano-Seeds from Activated Fly Ash Tuned for Enhancing the Early Strength in Blended Cements
Next Article in Special Issue
Hysteresis in Heat Capacity of MWCNTs Caused by Interface Behavior
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical Nature of Metals and Metal-Based Materials in Inactivation of Viruses
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

A First Assessment of Carbon Nanotubes Grown on Oil-Well Cement via Chemical Vapor Deposition

1
Department of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, Italy
2
National Interuniversity Consortium of Materials Science and Technology (INSTM), Via G. Giusti 9, 50121 Florence, Italy
3
Center for Sustainable Future Technologies @POLITO, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Livorno 60, 10144 Turin, Italy
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 77 Massachsetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
5
Department of Structural, Geotechnical and Building Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Duca Degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, Italy
6
Faculty of Science, Ontario Tech University, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(14), 2346; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12142346
Submission received: 8 June 2022 / Revised: 6 July 2022 / Accepted: 7 July 2022 / Published: 9 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon Nanocomposites: Synthesis, Properties and Applications)

Abstract

:
In this study, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were synthesized on an oil-well cement substrate using the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method. The effect of synthesis process on cement was investigated in depth. In this regard, FE-SEM, RAMAN and X-Ray spectroscopy were used to characterize the cement before and after the synthesis process to reveal the modifications to the cementitious matrix and some unique morphological features of CNTs.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Since the first observation [1] and report of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) in 1991 [2], and the observation of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) in 1993 [3], carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have attracted the attention of scientific and industrial world. CNTs have unique chemical and physical properties [4] that allow for their use in several applications [5,6,7,8]. The most common way of synthesizing carbon nanotubes is chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [9]. CVD allows, in addition to controlling the quality and morphology of CNTs [10,11], for nanotubes to grow on different types of supports [12,13]. In the last decade, the use of CNTs in cement- and concrete-based composites has received particular attention [14]. CNTs are particularly used to reinforce structures and enable the real-time monitoring of structures thanks to their conductive and piezoresistive nature [15,16,17]. The main problem with their use in cement is the difficulty of dispersion [17] and interaction with the cement [18]. Several works in the literature report different solutions to improve these aspects such as chemical functionalization and sonication [19,20,21,22,23,24]. However, these techniques are destructive and often do not guarantee a good interaction and dispersion in the matrix [25,26,27,28]. Other work has used CVD synthesis methods for nanotube growth on Portland cement [29] and, in one case, on class G cement [30]; however, the method and temperature used for the synthesis of CNTs differed to those used in this study. In this work, we report a new, alternative method to properly disperse CNTs in cement matrix by directly growing, via CVD, CNTs on a cement clinker (cement powder).

2. Materials and Methods

The cement used in this study is an American Petroleum Institute (API) oil-well cement Class G (Lafarge North America, Reston, VA, USA). Camphor (purity > 99%) and ferrocene (purity > 99%) were purchased by Sigma-Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany) and used without any further purification for CNT production. CVD process was run accordingly with that reported by Musso et al. [31], using camphor and ferrocene with a ratio of 20:1 by weight and a camphor/cement ratio of 1 by weight. Cement clinker was placed inside the reactor and heated at 1000 °C; once the temperature was reached, a flux of argon was used to carry the vapors of the camphor/ferrocene mixture into the reactor, as shown in Figure 1.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained using the X-ray diffractometer PW3040/60 X’Pert PRO MPD from, Panalytical BV, Almelo, Netherlands in a Bragg–Brentano geometry, with Cu Kα anode source at 40 KV and 40 mA.
Raman spectra were collected using a Renishaw inVia (H43662 model, Gloucestershire, UK) equipped with a green laser line (514 nm) with a 50× objective. Raman spectra were recorded in the range from 250 cm–1 to 3500 cm–1.
CNTs containing cement morphology was evaluated using a field emission scanning electrical microscope (FE-SEM, Zeis SupraTM40, Oberkochen, Germany).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Assessment Analysis of CNTs Based Cement Composites

The cement clinker recovered from the CVD process was preliminarily analysed though Raman spectroscopy [32] (Figure 2) to confirm the formation of CNTs.
The raman spectra of cement showed an inhomogeneous composition, as reported by Deng et al. [33], with grains rich in several phases of aluminosilicate (C3S, C2S, C3A) (Figure 2a) and grains rich in gypsum (Figure 2b). After CVD, the Raman spectra (Figure 1d) showed the ID and IG peaks, centred at 1346 cm−1 and 1575 cm−1, respectively, proving the formation of CNTs. The high temperature of the process led to a quite good-quality MWCNTs with an ID/IG of 0.98 [34]. It is worth noting that both the annealed clinker (Figure 2c) and the CVD-treated version (Figure 2d) exhibited a similar thermal conversion of CaSO4·2H2O into CaO and SO2, according to the thermal degradative mechanism reported by West et al. [35]. Moreover, for the CVD-treated clinker, the presence of iron precursors might promote and accelerate the gypsum thermal degradation.
As shown in Figure 3, CNTs grown on cement clinker were analysed by FE-SEM to evaluate their morphology.
As reported in Figure 3a, CNTs grew on the grains of clinker without forming any appreciable bundle, in accordance with with the results reported by Ghaharpour et al. [36], who used ethylene as precursor. Two main typologies of CNTs could be detected by FE-SEM analysis, as shown in Figure 3b,c. Some CNTs appear to have a smoother surface combined with a smaller average diameter (100 nm square circled), while others have a larger average diameter (approximately 200 nm) and seem to made by an inner CNT of approximately 10–50 nm in diameter, covered by a multilayered structure of approximately 50 nm in thickness (red circled). The cross-sections of such structures are highlighted with red circles. We hypothesized (see Figure S1) that, during the growth of the CNTs, their external walls are incrementally covered by layers of iron and iron/carbon compounds generated in excess as by-products of the CVD process.

3.2. X-ray Diffraction Analysis

The XRD spectra taken on pure cement clinker, cement clinker annealed at 1000 °C, and after the growth of CNTs are reported in Figure 4. Their analysis shows a complex phase composition. In the pristine class G cement clinker, the presence of the main cement phases is evident: bicalcium silicate (C2S), tricalcium silicate (C3S), calcium ferroaluminate (C4AF), calcium sulfate dihydrate (gypsum). Distinguishing between C2S and C3S is not easy, since the peaks are often superimposed. It seems that the main phase between the two is C3S, with only a minor contribution of C2S.
As previously shown with Raman analyses, after heat treatment at 1000 °C the annealed clinker exhibits the decomposition of both gypsum and its insoluble phase (CaSO4 also called “insoluble anhydrite”) into calcium oxide and sulfur oxide. This phenomenon is confirmed by the appearance of the peaks in the decomposition product CaO. Moreover, probably due to exposure to ambient humidity after thermal treatment, it is possible that part or all of the CaO is hydrated to Ca(OH)2. Again, it seems that the C3S phase is present in a much larger fraction than C2S.
On the other hand, the clinker on which CNTs were grown via CVD shows several different phase modifications with respect to both the pristine and the 1000 °C-annealed class G cement. First, even though gypsum and its insoluble phase are no longer observed, this phenomenon is different from the one described for the annealed clinker because the presence of carbon during the CVD process activates the catalytic reduction reaction of CaSO4 into CaS, as shown by Oh and Wheelock [37]. The C2S phase increases substantially, suggesting that the conversion of C3S into C2S and CaO is favored during the CVD growth of nanotubes, due to the catalytic role played by the iron used for the synthesis of CNTs [38]. This mechanism is also confirmed by the fact that CaO peaks in the CVD-treated clinker are much more intense than the ones detected for the annealed clinker [39]. As seen for the annealed clinker, the Ca(OH)2 peak increases as well, likely due to the water uptake after the synthesis. Finally, a small peak is observed at around 26.2°, corresponding to the main peak in CNTs, and another peak is observed at around 44.5°, corresponding to the main peak in α-Fe. The presence of both these peaks provides further confirmation of the observed CNT growth.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, we have demonstrated the direct growth in CNTs on cement clinker powder by CVD. Despite the fact that the process can cause the degradation of some cement phases, this route could be further explored to avoid the problems with the functionalization and dispersion of CNTs for cement-based composite applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano12142346/s1, Figure S1: Energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) results of CNTs grown on cement clinker.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M.; methodology, L.L. and M.B.; validation, L.L., M.B., M.P. and A.T.; formal analysis, D.S.-R.; investigation, L.L., M.B. and D.S.-R.; resources, A.T. and M.P.; data curation, L.L. and M.B.; writing—original draft preparation, L.L. and M.B.; writing—review and editing, L.L., S.M., M.B., M.P., D.S.-R. and A.T.; visualization, M.B and M.P.; supervision, S.M., M.P. and A.T.; project administration, M.P. and A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Radushkevich, L.; Lukyanovich, V.Á. O strukture ugleroda, obrazujucegosja pri termiceskom razlozenii okisi ugleroda na zeleznom kontakte. Zurn Fis. Chim. 1952, 26, 88–95. [Google Scholar]
  2. Iijima, S. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 1991, 354, 56–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Iijima, S.; Ichihashi, T. Single-shell carbon nanotubes of 1-nm diameter. Nature 1993, 363, 603–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Grobert, N. Carbon nanotubes–becoming clean. Mater. Today 2007, 10, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lavagna, L.; Massella, D.; Pantano, M.F.; Bosia, F.; Pugno, N.M.; Pavese, M. Grafting carbon nanotubes onto carbon fibres doubles their effective strength and the toughness of the composite. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2018, 166, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lavagna, L.; Marchisio, S.; Merlo, A.; Nisticò, R.; Pavese, M. Polyvinyl butyral-based composites with carbon nanotubes: Efficient dispersion as a key to high mechanical properties. Polym. Compos. 2020, 41, 3627–3637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kunwar, P.; Soman, P. Direct Laser Writing of Fluorescent Silver Nanoclusters: A Review of Methods and Applications. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 7325–7342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vinante, M.; Digregorio, G.; Lunelli, L.; Forti, S.; Musso, S.; Vanzetti, L.; Lui, A.; Pasquardini, L.; Giorcelli, M.; Tagliaferro, A. Human plasma protein adsorption on carbon-based materials. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2009, 9, 3785–3791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kumar, M.; Ando, Y. Chemical vapor deposition of carbon nanotubes: A review on growth mechanism and mass production. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2010, 10, 3739–3758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zhang, M.; Li, J. Carbon nanotube in different shapes. Mater. Today 2009, 12, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Öncel, Ç.; Yürüm, Y. Carbon nanotube synthesis via the catalytic CVD method: A review on the effect of reaction parameters. Fuller. Nanotub. Carbon Nonstruct. 2006, 14, 17–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. De Greef, N.; Zhang, L.; Magrez, A.; Forró, L.; Locquet, J.-P.; Verpoest, I.; Seo, J.W. Direct growth of carbon nanotubes on carbon fibers: Effect of the CVD parameters on the degradation of mechanical properties of carbon fibers. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2015, 51, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dong, X.; Li, B.; Wei, A.; Cao, X.; Chan-Park, M.B.; Zhang, H.; Li, L.-J.; Huang, W.; Chen, P. One-step growth of graphene–carbon nanotube hybrid materials by chemical vapor deposition. Carbon 2011, 49, 2944–2949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Reales, O.A.M.; Toledo Filho, R.D. A review on the chemical, mechanical and microstructural characterization of carbon nanotubes-cement based composites. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 154, 697–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Azhari, F.; Banthia, N. Cement-based sensors with carbon fibers and carbon nanotubes for piezoresistive sensing. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2012, 34, 866–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fu, X.; Lu, W.; Chung, D. Improving the strain-sensing ability of carbon fiber-reinforced cement by ozone treatment of the fibers. Cem. Concr. Res. 1998, 28, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Materazzi, A.L.; Ubertini, F.; D’Alessandro, A. Carbon nanotube cement-based transducers for dynamic sensing of strain. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2013, 37, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tafesse, M.; Kim, H.-K. The role of carbon nanotube on hydration kinetics and shrinkage of cement composite. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 169, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, K.; Yi, Z.; Jing, Q.; Yue, R.; Jiang, W.; Lin, D. Sonication-assisted dispersion of carbon nanotubes in aqueous solutions of the anionic surfactant SDBS: The role of sonication energy. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2013, 58, 2082–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Arrigo, R.; Teresi, R.; Gambarotti, C.; Parisi, F.; Lazzara, G.; Dintcheva, N.T. Sonication-induced modification of carbon nanotubes: Effect on the rheological and thermo-oxidative behaviour of polymer-based nanocomposites. Materials 2018, 11, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Rausch, J.; Zhuang, R.-C.; Mäder, E. Surfactant assisted dispersion of functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes in aqueous media. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2010, 41, 1038–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lavagna, L.; Nisticò, R.; Musso, S.; Pavese, M. Functionalization as a way to enhance dispersion of carbon nanotubes in matrices: A review. Mater. Today Chem. 2021, 20, 100477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sinnott, S.B. Chemical functionalization of carbon nanotubes. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2002, 2, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lavagna, L.; Bartoli, M.; Suarez-Riera, D.; Cagliero, D.; Musso, S.; Pavese, M. Oxidation of Carbon Nanotubes for Improving the Mechanical and Electrical Properties of Oil-Well Cement-Based Composites. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 6671–6678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huang, Y.Y.; Terentjev, E.M. Dispersion of carbon nanotubes: Mixing, sonication, stabilization, and composite properties. Polymers 2012, 4, 275–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Adhikary, S.K.; Rudžionis, Ž.; Rajapriya, R. The effect of carbon nanotubes on the flowability, mechanical, microstructural and durability properties of cementitious composite: An overview. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lavagna, L.; Musso, S.; Pavese, M. A facile method to oxidize carbon nanotubes in controlled flow of oxygen at 350° C. Mater. Lett. 2021, 283, 128816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wepasnick, K.A.; Smith, B.A.; Schrote, K.E.; Wilson, H.K.; Diegelmann, S.R.; Fairbrother, D.H. Surface and structural characterization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes following different oxidative treatments. Carbon 2011, 49, 24–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ludvig, P.; Calixto, J.M.; Ladeira, L.O.; Gaspar, I.C. Using converter dust to produce low cost cementitious composites by in situ carbon nanotube and nanofiber synthesis. Materials 2011, 4, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. de Paula, J.N.; Calixto, J.M.; Ladeira, L.O.; Ludvig, P.; Souza, T.C.C.; Rocha, J.M.; de Melo, A.A.V. Mechanical and rheological behavior of oil-well cement slurries produced with clinker containing carbon nanotubes. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2014, 122, 274–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Musso, S.; Porro, S.; Giorcelli, M.; Chiodoni, A.; Ricciardi, C.; Tagliaferro, A. Macroscopic growth of carbon nanotube mats and their mechanical properties. Carbon 2007, 45, 1133–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Orlando, A.; Franceschini, F.; Muscas, C.; Pidkova, S.; Bartoli, M.; Rovere, M.; Tagliaferro, A. A Comprehensive Review on Raman Spectroscopy Applications. Chemosensors 2021, 9, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Deng, C.-S.; Breen, C.; Yarwood, J.; Habesch, S.; Phipps, J.; Craster, B.; Maitland, G. Ageing of oilfield cement at high humidity: A combined FEG-ESEM and Raman microscopic investigation. J. Mater. Chem. 2002, 12, 3105–3112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tagliaferro, A.; Rovere, M.; Padovano, E.; Bartoli, M.; Giorcelli, M. Introducing the Novel Mixed Gaussian-Lorentzian Lineshape in the Analysis of the Raman Signal of Biochar. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. West, R.R.; Sutton, W.J. Thermography of gypsum. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1954, 37, 221–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ghaharpour, F.; Bahari, A.; Abbasi, M.; Ashkarran, A.A. Parametric investigation of CNT deposition on cement by CVD process. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 113, 523–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Oh, J.S.; Wheelock, T.D. Reductive decomposition of calcium sulfate with carbon monoxide: Reaction mechanism. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1990, 29, 544–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Li, X.; Shen, X.; Tang, M.; Li, X. Stability of tricalcium silicate and other primary phases in portland cement clinker. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 1954–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tenório, J.A.S.; Pereira, S.S.R.; Ferreira, A.V.; Espinosa, D.C.R.; da Silva Araújo, F.G. CCT diagrams of tricalcium silicate: Part I. Influence of the Fe2O3 content. Mater. Res. Bull. 2005, 40, 433–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the system used for carbon nanotube synthesis.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the system used for carbon nanotube synthesis.
Nanomaterials 12 02346 g001
Figure 2. Raman spectra (250–2000 cm−1 range) collected on (a) pristine cement clinker rich in aluminium silicate, (b) pristine cement clinker rich in calcium sulphate dihydrate (gypsum), (c) cement annealed at 1000 °C, and (d) cement after CVD growth.
Figure 2. Raman spectra (250–2000 cm−1 range) collected on (a) pristine cement clinker rich in aluminium silicate, (b) pristine cement clinker rich in calcium sulphate dihydrate (gypsum), (c) cement annealed at 1000 °C, and (d) cement after CVD growth.
Nanomaterials 12 02346 g002
Figure 3. FE-SEM images of CNTs grown on cement clinker, with magnification of (a) 3000, (b) 30,000 and (c) 50,000 times. Cross sections of individual CNTs are red circled/squared.
Figure 3. FE-SEM images of CNTs grown on cement clinker, with magnification of (a) 3000, (b) 30,000 and (c) 50,000 times. Cross sections of individual CNTs are red circled/squared.
Nanomaterials 12 02346 g003
Figure 4. X-ray diffraction spectra of pristine clinker (top), clinker annealed at 1000 °C (middle), and clinker CVD-treated for grown CNTs (bottom).
Figure 4. X-ray diffraction spectra of pristine clinker (top), clinker annealed at 1000 °C (middle), and clinker CVD-treated for grown CNTs (bottom).
Nanomaterials 12 02346 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lavagna, L.; Bartoli, M.; Musso, S.; Suarez-Riera, D.; Tagliaferro, A.; Pavese, M. A First Assessment of Carbon Nanotubes Grown on Oil-Well Cement via Chemical Vapor Deposition. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2346. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12142346

AMA Style

Lavagna L, Bartoli M, Musso S, Suarez-Riera D, Tagliaferro A, Pavese M. A First Assessment of Carbon Nanotubes Grown on Oil-Well Cement via Chemical Vapor Deposition. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(14):2346. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12142346

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lavagna, Luca, Mattia Bartoli, Simone Musso, Daniel Suarez-Riera, Alberto Tagliaferro, and Matteo Pavese. 2022. "A First Assessment of Carbon Nanotubes Grown on Oil-Well Cement via Chemical Vapor Deposition" Nanomaterials 12, no. 14: 2346. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12142346

APA Style

Lavagna, L., Bartoli, M., Musso, S., Suarez-Riera, D., Tagliaferro, A., & Pavese, M. (2022). A First Assessment of Carbon Nanotubes Grown on Oil-Well Cement via Chemical Vapor Deposition. Nanomaterials, 12(14), 2346. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12142346

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop