Next Article in Journal
Special Issue “Micro/Nano Emulsions: Smart Colloids for Multiple Applications”
Next Article in Special Issue
On the Tensile Strength of Spark Plasma Sintered AlMgB14 Ceramics
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of Experimental Nanoparticulated Dental Adhesive Resins with Long-Term Antibacterial Properties
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mechanical Properties and Deformation Behavior of Superhard Lightweight Nanocrystalline Ceramics
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effects of Diamond on Microstructure, Fracture Toughness, and Tribological Properties of TiO2-Diamond Composites

Nanomaterials 2022, 12(21), 3733; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12213733
by Bing Liu 1, Zewen Zhuge 1, Song Zhao 1, Yitong Zou 1, Ke Tong 1,*, Lei Sun 1, Xiaoyu Wang 1, Zitai Liang 1, Baozhong Li 1, Tianye Jin 1,2, Junyun Chen 1,2,* and Zhisheng Zhao 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(21), 3733; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12213733
Submission received: 7 October 2022 / Revised: 17 October 2022 / Accepted: 20 October 2022 / Published: 24 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Superhard Materials with Nanostructures)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this article, the authors prepared TiO2/diamond composite at low temperature sintering with varied ratio of diamond and examined the mechanical and tribological properties. Not any specific hypotheses were made but a high-pressure sintering method was demonstrated. The final conclusions are sound in scientific points of view and properly backed by the results. Nevertheless, I got two concerns about this study: 1) Columbite is a metastable polymorph of TiO2 that forms at high pressure. The possible re-transformation to a low temperature stable phase and its possible effect on the mechanical properties should be also discussed. 2) Considering the moderate improvement in the examined properties as compared to other type of reinforcing additives, the high price of nanodiamonds made little sense of using such a composite in real applications. Some more minor comments are as follows:

- - The ratio of the nanodiamonds should be given in volume ratio instead of weigth%.

  - More details is needed about sample synthesis, including e.g. the dimensions of the sintered samples, the heating method. Was the sample under pressure throughout the heating, if so, how it could be heated. The sample was quenched after heat treatment but in what way?

   - It is quite interesting that the hardness of the composite decreases with increasing the ratio of the hardest filler material. This phenomenon calls for some comment in the article.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The study deals with the preparation and investigation of the properties of the TiO2 -diamond composites. The results of the study are clearly written, conclusions are relevant and the study presents an interest for scientific society.  

  There are only minor questions, comments and suggestions.

 1. The main concern is a lack of discussion of the binding forces issue between the diamond and TiO2. It was found that between 10 and 40wt. % diamond significant changes occur in properties of composites and it was explained by agglomeration of diamond.

 - The Introduction should be extended with analysis how the size, concentration and other properties of diamond and matrix material influence on the properties of the diamond-TiO2 or some similar compounds.

 - As well as the Conclusions should contain a part regarding to this finding, i.e. existence of the limit in concentration of 10-20wt. % diamond (with particular size of diamond or maybe other properties) leading to the significant changes in properties of composite.

2. Authors write  that diamond, especially nanoscale diamond, is highly susceptible to oxidation or graphitization at relatively high sintering temperatures [16-18].

In the body of the text, the main reason of the degradation of the properties is diamond agglomeration of diamond. Please discuss in more details the possible reasons for the properties degradation between 10-40 wt. % diamond?

3. The results show firm interface binding between the diamond and TiO2. Diamond is a very inert material, what kind of the binding forces between the matrix and filler lead to a such conclusion? Could be that high compressive stress is the “adhesive force”? Discussion of this topic would be also desirable.   

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop