Next Article in Journal
Coherent Spin Dynamics of Electrons in CsPbBr3 Perovskite Nanocrystals at Room Temperature
Previous Article in Journal
Electrodeposition Synthesis of Coral-like MnCo Selenide Binder-Free Electrodes for Aqueous Asymmetric Supercapacitors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 13
Issue 17
10.3390/nano13172453
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Situ Fabrication of CdS/Cd(OH)2 for Effective Visible Light-Driven Photocatalysis

by
Ran Chen
1,
Liping Qian
1,
Shengyou Xu
1,
Shunli Wan
1,
Minghai Ma
1,
Lei Zhang
2,* and
Runren Jiang
3,*
1
Key Laboratory of Environmental Detection and Pollution Prevention, College of Life & Environmental Sciences, Huangshan University, Huangshan 245041, China
2
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng 224051, China
3
Key Laboratory of Integrated Regulation and Resource Development on Shallow Lakes, Ministry of Education, College of Environment, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(17), 2453; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13172453
Submission received: 11 August 2023 / Revised: 27 August 2023 / Accepted: 28 August 2023 / Published: 30 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Applications of New Functional Engineering Nanomaterials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Photocatalytic hydrogen production is a promising technology that can generate renewable energy. However, light absorption and fast electron transfer are two main challenges that restrict the practical application of photocatalysis. Moreover, most of the composite photocatalysts that possess better photocatalytic performance are fabricated by various methods, many of which are complicated and in which, the key conditions are hard to control. Herein, we developed a simple method to prepare CdS/Cd(OH)2 samples via an in situ synthesis approach during the photocatalytic reaction process. The optimal hydrogen generation rate of CdS/Cd(OH)2 that could be obtained was 15.2 mmol·h−1·g−1, greater than that of CdS, which generates 2.6 mmol·h−1·g−1 under visible light irradiation. Meanwhile, the CdS-3 sample shows superior HER performance during recycling tests and exhibits relatively steady photocatalytic performance in the 10 h experiment. Expanded absorption of visible light, decreased recombination possibility for photo-induced carriers and a more negative conduction band position are mainly responsible for the enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution performance. Photo-induced electrons will be motivated to the conduction band of CdS under the irradiation of visible light and will further transfer to Cd(OH)2 to react with H+ to produce H2. The in situ-formed Cd(OH)2 could effectively facilitate the electron transfer and reduce the recombination possibility of photo-generated electron-hole pairs.

1. Introduction

Currently, the energy crisis and environmental pollution are two challenges that challenge advancements in society [1,2,3]. Hydrogen shows great potential to replace petroleum, coal and natural gas to alleviate the energy crisis as well as environmental degradation [4,5,6]. Among emerging technologies, photocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) over semiconductors efficiently produces hydrogen in a low cost, environmentally friendly process, in which process conditions are easy to control [7,8,9,10]. Since the first use of semiconductors in photocatalysis in hydrogen generation, numerous initiatives have been directed towards this area. To date, various types of photocatalysts have been synthesized, such as sulphide [11,12,13], carbon-based materials [14,15,16], transition metal oxides [17,18,19] and so on.
Generally, two important factors of these processes include the capability of light harvesting and efficiency of charge separation, which affects the photocatalytic activity of H2 generation [20,21,22]. Innumerable amounts of solar irradiation reaches our planet and visible light takes up a large proportion, approximately 43% of the total energy, in contrast to ultraviolet light which accounts for only 4% [23]. As a consequence, visible-light-driven photocatalysts have drawn more attention compared to ultraviolet-light-driven photocatalysts, recently [24,25,26]. Among the various photocatalysts, cadmium sulfide (CdS) is widely studied for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under the irradiation of visible light [27]. Based on previous works [28,29,30], metal sulfide generation has been reported, with a remarkable visible light response, sufficient active sites, and appropriate reduction potential of H+/H2 as an effective photocatalyst. Moreover, emerging quantum size effects enable further tunability towards fast charge transfer, enhanced excited state lifetime, etc. Although photocatalytic hydrogen evolution based on metal sulfide semiconductors is considered an economical, environmentally benign, renewable, and clean technology, the usefulness of these photocatalysts is limited by the low solar energy utilization and the fast recombination of photo-excited electron-hole pairs. In this respect, an effective strategy to promote the efficiency of hydrogen evolution is the hybridization of suitable components with CdS, which will promote the transmission of electrons, therefore decreasing the possibility of recombination photo-generated electron-hole pairs [31,32,33]. In addition, the existence of suitable components will enhance the stability of photocatalysts by resisting the photocorrosion of light. In general, noble metals are a good choice for coupling with CdS. Noble metal deposition can accelerate the segregation of photo-induced electron-hole pairs. Moreover, they will provide more active sites to facilitate water splitting [34,35]. However, the high cost as well as limited abundance restrict the comprehensive use of noble metals. Thus far, non-noble and earth-abundant metals have been extensive studied, and these metals show great potential as candidates to replace precious noble metals [36,37]. Therefore, many methods have been attempted to solve the intrinsic problems of pure CdS. One effective approach to improve the photocatalytic performance of CdS for hydrogen evolution reaction is assembling pure CdS with other non-noble and earth-abundant metals. These have attracted much attention in research for their low cost, large storage and relative high efficiency [38,39,40,41]. For example, Shang and co-authors [42] synthesized a new CdS nanoparticle/CdS nanoslice material and it showed remarkable photocatalytic activity for water splitting. The enhanced photocatalytic performance was mainly attribute to the superior electrical conductivity and good ability of visible light absorption. Additionally, Wang et al. [43] prepared a series of Cd/CdS photocatalysts which showed great enhancement of the hydrogen generation reaction. Effective separation of photo-induced electron-hole pairs was largely responsible for the improved photocatalytic activity. However, most of the composite photocatalysts were fabricated by various methods prior to a reaction, and many of the approaches are complicated and hard to control the experiment conditions [44,45,46].
Energy band structure of the photocatalysts plays a vital role in a photocatalytic hydrogen evolution process. The band structure includes band gap (Eg) and conduction band (CB) and valence band (VB) positions. The properties of the band structure of the photocatalysts determine whether a specific photocatalytic process can occur, and the reaction rate. For example, a catalyst with a smaller Eg has a wider spectral range available, which is beneficial for the photocatalytic hydrogen generation reaction. At the same time, the CB position of the photocatalyst should also be matched with the corresponding hydrogen reduction reaction energy. Generally, a more negative CB position is favorable for the photocatalytic reduction process. Therefore, the influence of the band structure should be considered comprehensively to design the appropriate semiconductors. CdS has received much attention for potential applications in optoelectronic nanodevices and biological labeling, due to its electronic band-gaps that can accomodate the size and shape of nanocrystals (NCs). CdS nanoparticles exhibit size-dependent properties, such as a blue shift of absorption onset, a change of electrochemical potential of band edge, and an enhancement of photo catalytic activities, with decreasing crystallite size. Recently, many approaches have been attempted to regulate the energy band structure for a better photocatalytic performance, such as doping with metal or nonmetal ions [47,48,49], developing solid solutions [50,51] and developing single-phase photocatalysts [52]. For example, Wang et al. [53] reported a CdS@ZIF-67 photocatalyst via multiple-step synthesis process for water splitting under visible light irradiation, with a hydrogen generation rate of 2.21 mmol·h−1·g−1, which is 25.7 times more than that of pure CdS. More negative conduction band positions and enhanced separation of photo-induced carriers favor the promoted photocatalytic activity of hydrogen generation. Feng et al. [54] synthesized facet heterojunctions on a hexagonal pyramid with CdS single crystals by employing a urothermal method with higher hydrogen generation efficiency compared to CdS nanorod and nanoparticles. The control of CdS crystal planes can effectively improve the separation efficiency of photo-generated carriers and further increase the photocatalytic hydrogen production activity. However, most of the methods in regulating the energy band structure are time-consuming and the experimental conditions are difficult to accurately control.
In this study, we designed and successfully prepared a series of CdS/Cd(OH)2 photocatalysts, via in situ fabrication method during the photocatalytic hydrogen production process and was effective in water splitting. Physicochemical properties of CdS/Cd(OH)2 samples are studied in detail and the mechanism of effective catalytic performance is also explored. Under the irradiation of visible light, the optimal hydrogen generation rate of CdS/Cd(OH)2 was 15.2 mmol·h−1·g−1, which was greater than that of CdS, which was 2.6 mmol·h−1·g−1. Meanwhile, the obtained CdS-3 sample, via the adjustment of pH by the use of pure CdS during the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution process, shows superior HER performance during the recycling tests and exhibits relative steady photocatalytic performance in the 10 h experiment. According to the properties of expanded absorption of visible light, reduced recombination possibility of photo-induced carriers and a more negative conduction band position are mainly responsible for the enhanced photocatalytic performance. Photo-induced electrons will be motivated to CB of CdS under the irradiation of visible light and further transfer to Cd(OH)2 to react with H+ to produce H2. The in situ-formed Cd(OH)2 could effectively facilitate electron transfer and reduce the recombination possibility of photo-generated electron-hole pairs, and thus improve the hydrogen evolution performance.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Preparation of CdS

CdS photocatalyst was prepared by a facile hydrothermal method. Typically, 1.1525 g Cd(CH3COO)2·2H2O was added to deionized water (60 mL) with 0.7612 g CH4N2S and this was stirred for 30 min. Then, the mixture was transferred into a 100 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave and heated at 160 °C for 24 h. Next, the yellow precipitation was thoroughly washed with DI water and ethanol several times. Lastly, the obtained yellow precipitation was placed into an oven at 60 °C for 10 h before using.

2.2. Preparation of CdS/Cd(OH)2

CdS/Cd(OH)2 photocatalysts were prepared by a facile in situ preparation method. Typically, 5 mg as-synthesized CdS was dropped into the 50 mL deionized water containing 0.25 M sodium sulfide and 0.35 M sodium sulfite. Then, the pH of the above solution was adjusted with NaOH (pH = 12.54, 13 and 14). After 4 h, the materials of photocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction were obtained via centrifugation at 10,000 rpm. Finally, the obtained materials were washed several times, followed by drying at 60 °C for 12 h. The acquired samples with pH = 12.54, 13 and 14 were denoted as CdS-1, CdS-2 and CdS-3, respectively.

2.3. Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) characterization was employed to analyze the catalyst structure, which was measured by a Shimadzu/XD-3A diffractometer system. Copper Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) was performed and the data were gathered at a 2θ range of 10–80°. The morphologies of the catalysts were measured over transmission electron microscopy (TEM) by using an FEI TECNAI G20 system. UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) were then recorded using Shimadzu/UV-3600 equipment at a range of 200–800 nm. Photoluminescence (PL) analysis was employed to study the transportation of electrons using a Hitachi/F-7000 apparatus. X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were obtained by using a PHI 5000 Versaprobe with Al-Kα radiation aiming at making a better sense of the structure of catalysts. To study the changing of elements in the catalyst more exactly, C1s at 284.7 eV was used to calibrate the binding energy.
Electrochemical properties of the as-prepared catalysts were acquired in 0.5 M H2SO4 using a typical three-electrode setup on an electrochemical station (Chenhua Instruments, Shanghai, China; CHI660D) with a Ag/AgCl reference electrode, a graphite rod or Pt foil as counter electrode and CdS composites as working electrode. Firstly, 5 mg of the as-prepared photocatalyst was dissolved in 1 mL solution which contained 20 μL nafion, 245 μL ethanol and 735 μL water. Then, the solution was exposed to ultrasound for 30 min before using. Lastly, the solution was placed ina conductive glass and heated at 140 °C in an oven for 2 h before using. All potential data are given relative to the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) according to the following equation:
E R H E = E A g / A g C l + 0.197 + 0.059 × p H ( V ) .
The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and photocurrent with 20 s on/off were conducted under the irradiation of visible light provided by a 250 W mercury vapour lamp.

2.4. Photocatalytic Performance

Photocatalytic activity of hydrogen evolution was tested in a 150 mL quartz reactor which connects to a gas circulation and evacuation system. Typically, 5 mg of the photocatalysts was dropped in 50 mL solution containing 0.25 M sodium sulfide and 0.35 M sodium sulfite, then the pH of the solution was adjusted via NaOH. The system was evacuated for about 30 min to remove air, followed by irradiation with a 300 W xenon lamp with a 420 nm cut-off filter (CELHXF300, Beijing China Education Au-light Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). The produced hydrogen was determined by an online gas chromatogram (GC 7900) equipped with a thermal conductivity detector. Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution performance of pure CdS was measured similar to the previous procedures without the addition of NaOH.
In the presence of sodium sulfide and sodium sulfite sa sacrificial reagents, the chemical equations for the formation of Cd(OH)2 are listed as follows:
N a 2 S O 3 + H 2 O → H 2 S O 3 + N a O H ,
N a 2 S + H 2 O → N a O H + N a H S
and
2 O H − + C d 2 + → C d ( O H ) 2 .

3. Results and Discussion

X-ray diffraction (XRD) characterization was adopted to study the crystallinity of the as-prepared pure CdS and a series of CdS-x (x = 1, 2 and 3) samples. As can be seen in Figure 1, bare CdS shows several peaks at 2θ = 24.9°, 26.4°, 28.1°, 43.7°, 47.8°, 51.9° and 53.0° corresponding to (100), (002), (101), (110), (103), (112) and (201) phases of hexagonal CdS (41-1049) [55,56]. For the CdS-x photocatalysts, all intensities of peaks assigned to CdS decreased; the reason for this may be due to the poor crystallinity generated during the preparation process. Meanwhile, peaks at 2θ = 30.1°, 32.2°, 34.4° and 37.9° could be detected in CdS-x samples, which matches well with Cd(OH)2 (73-0969) [24,57,58], confirming the formation of Cd(OH)2. No further peaks corresponding to other Cd species could be detected and no shift of diffraction peaks was found, according to the XRD results. Adjusting of pH via NaOH during the photocatalytic process contributes to the formation of Cd(OH)2, which may favor the electron transfer during the hydrogen generation process (HER).
Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) and high-resolution TEM (HR-TEM) characterizations were adopted to investigate the morphology of the CdS-3 and pure CdS sample. In Figure 2a,b, the CdS-3 sample exhibits a poor regular marginal structure with many protruding edges. Elemental mapping results of CdS-3 are shown in Figure 2c. As can be seen, Cd, S and O elements dispersed well in the selected area, which proved the existence of Cd, S and O elements and the formation of Cd(OH)2. Compared to pure CdS in Figure 2d,e, obviously morphology changes can be detected on CdS-3, via the pH adjustment. Bare CdS exhibits nanosphere structures with regular edges. However, the morphology of edges became vague and raised with the adjusted pH, demonstrating the changed margin of CdS. In the magnified image (Figure 2b), two different lattice spaces of 0.34 nm, attributed to CdS (002), and 0.30 nm, belonging to Cd(OH)2 (100), can be detected in the CdS-3 sample [58,59,60], which matches well with XRD results. The above results demonstrate the formation of Cd(OH)2 with the pH adjustment during the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction.
X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) analysis was carried out to study the valence state and chemical composition of the as-prepared pure CdS and a series of CdS-x (x = 1, 2 and 3) samples.
XPS results of pure CdS is shown in Figure 3. As can be seen in Figure 3a, S, Cd and C elements are detected and contained in the survey scan, verifying the existence of these elements in the CdS sample. In Figure 3b, a strong doublet with binding energies of 411.9 and 405.0 eV matches well with Cd 3d3/2 and Cd 3d5/2, respectively, which is typical of Cd2+ in CdS [61]. In addition, the CdS photocatalyst shows two peaks of S 2p at high-resolution at binding energies of 162.5 eV and 161.4 eV, which belong to S 2p1/2 and S 2p3/2 (Figure 3c). In Figure 3d, a peak corresponding to adsorbed oxygen can be detected at ca. 532.5 eV [62].
XPS results of the CdS-3 sample was studied to provide a better comparison with pure CdS, and further to explore the changing of the photocatalyst after the adjusting of pH during the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction. As can be seen in Figure 4a, S, Cd and C elements can all be detected in the survey scan, proving the coexistence of these elements in the CdS-3 sample. In the Cd 3d high-resolution spectrum in Figure 4b, two peaks with a binding energy of 412.1 eV, belonging to Cd 3d5/2, and another with 405.2 eV, corresponding to Cd 3d3/2, can be found in the CdS-3 sample, which denotes the presence of Cd2. Compared to the Cd 3d high-resolution spectrum of pure CdS in Figure 3b, an obvious shift can be detected in the Cd 3d high-resolution spectrum, illustrating the changed coordination environment around the Cd atom. In Figure 4c, the CdS-3 photocatalyst has two peaks of S 2p high-resolution at binding energies of 162.7 eV and 161.4 eV, corresponding to S 2p1/2 and S 2p3/2, respectively [39]. In the O 1s high-resolution spectrum (Figure 4d), peaks centered at 536.7 eV represent the adsorbed H2O. Meanwhile, peaks at 533.4 eV and 532.0 eV can be ascribed to Cd-OH and adsorbed oxygen, respectively [63,64]. The above results demonstrate the formation of Cd(OH)2 after the adjusting of pH during the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction, which matches well with the XRD and TEM results.
Additionally, XPS results of CdS-1 and CdS-2 were investigated to provide further comparisons with CdS and to demonstrate the changes of the photocatalyst after the adjusting of pH during the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction (Figure 5a–d). As can be shown in Figure 5a, S, Cd and C elements are present in the CdS-1 and CdS-2 samples, as they can all be detected in the survey scan. In Figure 5b, a continuous shift of the CdS 3d XPS spectrum can be found, compared to that of the pure CdS, which proves the changed coordination environment around the Cd atom. In Figure 5c, CdS-1 and CdS-2 photocatalysts show two peaks of S 2p high-resolution corresponding to S 2p1/2 and S 2p3/2, respectively. In the O 1s high-resolution spectrum (Figure 5d), peaks centered at ca. 533.0 eV and 532.0 eV can be ascribed to Cd-OH and adsorbed oxygen, respectively, which is similar to the CdS-3 sample. Based on the above analyses and results, Cd(OH)2 is formed after the adjusting of pH during the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction and confirms the successful preparation of CdS/Cd(OH)2.
Photocatalytic hydrogen production of CdS and a series of CdS-x samples were measured by using SO32−/S2− as sacrificial reagents under the irradiation of visible light. As can be seen in Figure 6a, pure CdS exhibits poor HER performance with a hydrogen production rate of 2.6 mmol·h−1·g−1. Fast recombination of photo-induced carriers and limited light absorption are mainly responsible for the low hydrogen generation rate. For CdS-x samples, the H2 production rate is increased with the adjustment ofthe pH during the photocatalytic process;the optimal H2 generation rate was 15.2 mmol·h−1·g−1 for CdS-3 sample. Formation of Cd(OH)2 could effectively transfer photo-induced electrons. Additionally, the stability of the photocatalyst acts as an important aspect in practical application, and the cyclic experiment of CdS-3 was carried out, shown in Figure 6b. As can be seen, the CdS-3 sample shows a hydrogen production behaviour in the cycling test similar to the original one, which denotes the superior stability of the CdS-3 sample.
Moreover, in order to study the long-term photocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction, a 10 h test was employed and shown in Figure 7a. As shown in the figure, the CdS-3 sample exhibits a relatively steady photocatalytic performance in the 10 h test. The XRD pattern of CdS-3 has been measured after the 10 h reaction, which is shown in Figure 7b. No clear change can be detected in the figure, suggesting the superior stability of CdS-3. The above results demonstrate the remarkable stability of the CdS-3 sample.
The mechanism of the enhanced HER performance, compared to the CdS-3 sample, was studied. In Figure 8a, the absorption properties of the as-prepared photocatalysts are presented via results of the UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS). As can be seen, CdS displays the absorption edge at ca. 554 nm, with the band-gap calculated to be 2.24 eV (inserted figure in Figure 8a), which matches well with our previous work [65]. It is obvious that the CdS-3 sample shows a broader absorption of visible light, demonstrating an enhanced absorbance capability of visible light, which may be ascribed to the formation of Cd(OH)2. In contrast, CdS-3 shows an extended visible light absorption with band gap of 2.22 eV (inserted figure in Figure 8a), which may favor the HER. Furthermore, the band gap decreased after the adjustment of pH, which may result in a lower possibility of recombination of photo-induced carriers.
Photoluminescence (PL) was carried out to study the separation efficiency of photo-induced carriers. Generally, a lower PL intensity signifies better electron transfer and this will facilitate hydrogen production. As shown in Figure 8b, the CdS photocatalyst exhibits an emission peak at around 570 nm, which is ascribed to the band-edge emission of CdS [66]. Obviously, CdS-3 exhibits a relatively lower PL intensity compared to pure CdS, illustrating better electron transfer in the HER process and higher carrier utilization. Photocurrent response measurement was conducted to further study the electrons transportation under visible light irradiation with 20 s on/off cycles. As can be seen in Figure 8c, both CdS and CdS-3 photocatalysts show photocurrent transient responses in the cycling test. The CdS-3 sample shows increased light response compared to pure CdS, which indicates better electron transfer and lower recombination of photo-generated carriers. Meanwhile, the photocurrent responses maintain their stability after several on/off cycles, which suggests that the CdS-3 photocatalyst can resist photocorrosion, which is in accordance with the PL results. To provide more information about the transferring of electrons on CdS and CdS-3 samples, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) characterization was performed and shown in Figure 8d. Generally, a small arc radius of the EIS results means a fast electron transfer. Clearly, CdS-3 possesses a reduced arc radius in comparison with bare CdS, indicating a lower resistance and fast electron shifting. Based on the above results, it can be concluded that the adjusting of pH to generate Cd(OH)2 during the photocatalytic process could effectively reduce the recombination possibility of photo-induced carriers and accelerate electron transfer, resulting in an increased hydrogen production rate. Mott–Schottky characterization of CdS and CdS-3 samples was performed to study the energy band structure and the results are shown in Figure 8e,f. The conduction band of CdS-3 and pure CdS were −0.77 V and −0.66 V, respectively, which were identified from the Tauc’s plot, by taking into account the transmittance and reflectance of the samples. A more negative CB signifies a better reduction capability for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution and favors the water splitting reaction. As a result, the formation of Cd(OH)2 resulted in a reduced band gap and a more negative conduction band position, which will accelerate the transfer of electrons.
The reaction mechanism of HER under the irradiation of visible light is proposed and shown in Figure 9. Here, the band structure of CdS-3 shows a more negative conduction band (CB) compared to pure CdS, which will be beneficial to the reduction process and will increase the HER. Meanwhile, Figure 8e,f shows the CB of CdS-3 (−0.77 V) and pure CdS (−0.66 V), which is obtained from the DRS spectra (Figure 8a) and confirms the feasibility of forming Cd(OH)2 via adjusting pH during the photocatalytic process. Briefly, photo-induced electrons will be motivated to CB of CdS under the irradiation of visible light, while holes will be consumed by SO32−/S2− in the valence band (VB). Then, the electrons will further transfer to Cd(OH)2 to react with H+ to produce H2. The in situ formed Cd(OH)2 could effectively facilitate the transfer of electrons and reduce the recombination possibility of photo-generated electron-hole pairs.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we developed a simple in situ synthesis method and successfully synthesized a CdS/Cd(OH)2 photocatalyst for hydrogen generation. Adjusting the pH during the photocatalytic process could generate Cd(OH)2, which extends the light absorption and facilitates electron transfer. The optimal hydrogen generation rate that could be obtained was 15.2 mmol·h−1·g−1 compared to 2.6 mmol·h−1·g−1 for CdS. Meanwhile, CdS-3 sample shows superior HER performance during the recycling tests and exhibits relative steady photocatalytic performance in the 10 h experiment. Expanded absorption of visible light and reduced recombination possibility of photo-induced carriers promote the photocatalytic activity. The in situ-formed Cd(OH)2 could effectively facilitate electron transfer and reduce the recombination possibility of photo-generated electron-hole pairs. This work is hoped to rapidly synthesize high-efficiency photocatalyst via in situ fabrication method.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.Q.; methodology, L.Q.; software, S.X.; validation, S.W.; formal analysis, M.M.; investigation, L.Z.; data curation, S.X.; writing—original draft preparation, R.C.; writing—review and editing, R.J.; visualization, L.Z.; supervision, L.Z. and R.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Science Foundation of China (52200195, 22006047), talent program of Huangshan University (2021xkjq007), major project of Natural science research in Anhui Universities (KJ2019ZD42).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, R.; Chen, J.; Gao, X.; Ao, Y.H.; Wang, P.F. Probing the role of surface acid sites on the photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline hydrochloride over cerium doped CdS via experiments and theoretical calculations. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 16620–16630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, R.; Wang, P.F.; Chen, J.; Wang, C.; Ao, Y.H. Synergetic effect of MoS2 and MXene on the enhanced H2 evolution performance of CdS under visible light irradiation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 473, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, R.; Chen, J.; Che, H.N.; Zhou, G.; Ao, Y.H.; Liu, B. Atomically dispersed main group magnesium on cadmium sulfide as the active site for promoting photocatalytic hydrogen evolution catalysis. Chin. J. Struc. Chem. 2022, 41, 2201014–2201018. [Google Scholar]
  4. Liu, Q.Q.; Shen, J.Y.; Yang, X.F.; Zhang, T.R.; Tang, H. 3D reduced graphene oxide aerogel-mediated Z-scheme photocatalytic system for highly efficient solar-driven water oxidation and removal of antibiotics. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 232, 562–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Che, H.N.; Che, G.B.; Zhou, P.J.; Liu, C.B.; Dong, H.J.; Li, C.X.; Song, N.; Li, C.M. Nitrogen doped carbon ribbons modified g-C3N4 for markedly enhanced photocatalytic H2-production in visible to near-infrared region. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 382, 122870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, X.H.; Ma, H.Q.; Zhong, W.; Fan, J.J.; Yu, H.G. Porous crystalline g-C3N4: Bifunctional NaHCO3 template-mediated synthesis and improved photocatalytic H2-evolution rate. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 271, 118899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jiang, X.H.; Zhang, L.S.; Liu, H.Y.; Wu, D.S.; Wu, F.Y.; Tian, L.; Liu, L.L.; Zou, J.P.; Luo, S.L.; Chen, B.B. Silver single atom in carbon nitride catalyst for highly efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 23112–23116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Shi, R.; Ye, H.F.; Liang, F.; Wang, Z.; Li, K.; Weng, Y.X.; Lin, Z.S.; Fu, W.F.; Che, C.M.; Chen, Y. Interstitial P-doped CdS with long-lived photogenerated electrons for photocatalytic water splitting without sacrificial agents. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, R.; Luo, Y.; Qian, P.; Ma, M.H.I.; She, X.S. Rational designing of dual-functional photocatalysts for simultaneous hydrogen generation and organic pollutants degradation over Cd0.5Mn0.5S/CoP. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 32921–32927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, R.; Ma, M.H.; Luo, Y.; Qian, L.P.; Xu, S.Y. Enhanced interfacial effect between CdS and ReS2 on boosted hydrogen evolution performance via phase structure engineering. J. Solid State Chem. 2022, 312, 123238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sivula, K.; Van De Krol, R. Semiconducting materials for photoelectrochemical energy conversion. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 15010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Amirav, L.; Alivisatos, A.P. Photocatalytic hydrogen production with tunable nanorod heterostructures. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 1051–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shiga, Y.; Umezawa, N.; Srinivasan, N.; Koyasu, S.; Sakai, E.; Miyauchi, M. A metal sulfide photocatalyst composed of ubiquitous elements for solar hydrogen production. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 7470–7473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Han, H.T.; Meng, X.C. Hydrothermal preparation of C3N4 on carbonized wood for photothermal-photocatalytic water splitting to efficiently evolve hydrogen. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 650, 846–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jia, Y.C.; Tong, X.; Zhang, J.Z.; Zhang, R.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Ji, X. A facile synthesis of coral tubular g-C3N4 for photocatalytic degradation RhB and CO2 reduction. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 965, 171432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bai, P.H.; Wang, C.J.; Xie, J.; Wang, H.; Kang, X.L.; Chen, M.; Wang, X. Ni-anchored g-C3N4 for improved hydrogen evolution in photocatalysis. Nanotechnology 2023, 34, 365402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, S.Q.; Qi, W.L.; Liu, J.; Meng, X.J.; Adimi, S.; Attfield, P.; Yang, M.H. Modulating electronic structure to improve the solar to hydrogen efficiency of cobalt nitride with lattice doping. ACS Catal. 2023, 13, 2214–2222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fateh, M.; Tessa, G.; Pelagia-Iren, G. Photochemical water splitting via transition metal oxides. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1303. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhao, H.; Jian, L.; Gong, M.; Jing, M.Y.; Li, H.X.; Mao, Q.Y.; Lu, T.B.; Guo, Y.X.; Ji, R.; Chi, W.W.; et al. Transition-metal-based cocatalysts for photocatalytic water splitting. Small Struct. 2022, 3, 2100229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lv, K.L.; Fang, S.; Si, L.; Xia, Y.; Ho, W.; Li, M. Fabrication of TiO2 nanorod assembly grafted rGO (rGO@TiO2-NR) hybridized flake-like photocatalyst. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 391, 218–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yu, F.; Wang, L.C.; Xing, Q.J.; Wang, D.K.; Jiang, X.H.; Li, G.C.; Zheng, A.M.; Li, F.R.; Zou, J.P. Functional groups to modify g-C3N4 for improved photocatalytic activity of hydrogen evolution from water splitting. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 31, 1648–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zou, J.P.; Wang, L.C.; Luo, J. Synthesis and efficient visible light photocatalytic H2 evolution of a metal-free g-C3N4/graphene quantum dots hybrid photocatalyst. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 193, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yu, J.; Li, Q.; Liu, S.; Jaroniec, M. Ionic-liquid-assisted synthesis of uniform fluorinated B/C-codoped TiO2 nanocrystals and their enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity. Chemistry 2013, 19, 2433–2441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, Q.; Shi, T.; Lv, K.L.; Liu, F.L.; Li, H.Y.; Lei, M. Remarkable positive effect of Cd(OH)2 on CdS semiconductor for visible-light photocatalytic H2 production. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 229, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kim, H.; Yoo, H.Y.; Hong, S.; Lee, S.; Lee, S.; Park, B.S.; Park, H.; Lee, C.; Lee, J. Effects of inorganic oxidants on kinetics and mechanisms of WO3-mediated photocatalytic degradation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 162, 515–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Park, Y.; Kim, W.; Park, H.; Tachikawa, T.; Majima, T.; Choi, W. Carbon-doped TiO2 photocatalyst synthesized without using an external carbon precursor and the visible light activity. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2009, 91, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, J.; Ke, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, B.; Wang, L.; Xiao, H.; Wang, S. Co3O4 quantum dots/TiO2 nanobelt hybrids for highly efficient photocatalytic overall water splitting. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 236, 396–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Frame, F.A.; Osterloh, F.E. CdSe-MoS2: A quantum size-confined photocatalyst for hydrogen evolution from water under visible light. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 10628–10633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Keimer, B.; Moore, J. The physics of quantum materials. Nat. Phys. 2017, 13, 1045–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zamin, M.; Narmina, O.B. Metal sulfide photocatalysts for hydrogen generation: A review of recent advances. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1316. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang, Y.B.; Wang, Y.S.; Xu, R. Photochemical deposition of Pt on CdS for H2 evolution from water: Markedly enhanced activity by controlling Pt reduction environment. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 783–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, Y.; Yu, Y.X.; Zhang, W.D. MoS2/CdS heterojunction with high photoelectrochemical activity for H2 evolution under visible light: The role of MoS2. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 12949–12957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jiang, D.C.; Sun, Z.J.; Jia, H.X.; Lu, D.P.; Du, P.W. A cocatalyst-free CdS nanorod/ZnS nanoparticle composite for high-performance visible-light-driven hydrogen production from water. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 675–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, W.; Lee, J.R.; Jackel, F. Simultaneous optimization of colloidal stability and interfacial charge transfer efficiency in photocatalytic Pt/CdS nanocrystals. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 9434–29441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Majeed, I.; Nadeem, M.A.; Al-Oufi, M.; Nadeem, M.A.; Waterhouse, G.I.N.; Badshah, A.; Metson, J.B.; Idriss, H. On the role of metal particle size and surface coverage for photo-catalytic hydrogen production: A case study of the Au/CdS system. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 182, 266–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chang, K.; Li, M.; Wang, T.; Ouyang, S.X.; Li, P.; Liu, L.Q.; Ye, J.H. Drastic layer-number-dependent activity enhancement in photocatalytic H2 evolution over nMoS2/CdS (n≥1) under visible light. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 9491–9501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Du, P.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xu, D.; Peng, W.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, F.; Fan, X. Metallic 1T phase MoS2 nanosheets as a highly efficient co-catalyst for the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution of CdS nanorods. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 74394–74399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stavroula, K.; Kyriakos, S.C. Dual-functional photocatalysis for simultaneous hydrogen production and oxidation of organic substances. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 4247–4270. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang, J.F.; Wageh, S.; Al-Ghamdi, A.; Yu, J.G. New understanding on the different photocatalytic activity of wurtzite and zinc-blende CdS. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 192, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ran, J.R.; Zhang, J.; Yu, J.; Jaroniec, M.; Qiao, S.Z. Earth-abundant cocatalysts for semiconductor-based photocatalytic water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 7787–7812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Iqbal, S.; Pan, Z.W.; Zhou, K.B. Enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from in situ formation of few-layered MoS2/CdS nanosheet-based van der Waals heterostructures. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 6638–6642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Shang, L.; Tong, B.; Yu, H.J.; Waterhouse, G.I.N.; Zhou, C.; Zhao, Y.F.; Tahir, M.; Wu, L.Z.; Tung, C.H.; Zhang, T.R. CdS nanoparticle-decorated Cd nanosheets for efficient visible light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1501241–1501247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, Q.Z.; Li, J.J.; Bai, Y.; Lian, J.H.; Huang, H.H.; Li, Z.M.; Lei, Z.Q.; Shangguan, W.F. Photochemical preparation of Cd/CdS photocatalysts and their efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production under visible light irradiation. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 2728–2735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ran, J.R.; Yu, J.G.; Jaroniec, M. Ni(OH)2 modified CdS nanorods for highly efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic H2 generation. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 2708–2713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ran, J.R.; Yu, J.G. Facile preparation and enhanced photocatalytic H2-production activity of Cu(OH)2 cluster modified TiO2. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 1364–1371. [Google Scholar]
  46. Marta, I.L. Heterogeneous photocatalysis: Transition metal ions in photocatalytic systems. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 1999, 23, 89–104. [Google Scholar]
  47. Leung, D.Y.C.; Fu, X.L.; Wang, C.F.; Ni, M.; Leung, M.K.H.; Wang, X.X.; Fu, X.Z. Hydrogen production over titania-based photocatalysts. Chemsuschem 2010, 3, 681–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kudo, A.; Sekizawa, M. Photocatalytic H2 evolution under visible light irradiation on Ni-doped ZnS photocatalyst. Chem. Commun. 2000, 15, 1371–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zou, Z.G.; Ye, J.H.; Sayama, K.; Arakawa, H. Direct splitting of water under visible light irradiation with an oxide semiconductor photocatalyst. Nature 2001, 414, 625–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xing, C.J.; Zhang, Y.J.; Yan, W.; Guo, L.J. Band structure-controlled solid solution of Cd1-xCd1-x ZnxSZnxS photocatalyst for hydrogen production by water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2006, 31, 2018–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lee, Y.; Teramura, K.; Hara, M.; Domen, K. Modification of (Zn1+xGe)(N2Ox) solid solution as a visible light driven photocatalyst for overall water splitting. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 2120–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yao, W.F.; Huang, C.P.; Ye, J.H. Hydrogen production and characterization of MLaSrNb2NiO9 (M = Na, Cs, H) based photocatalysts. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 1107–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, T.; Guo, C.Y.; Zhang, L.G.; Cao, X.L.; Niu, Y.N.; Li, J.; Akram, N.; Wang, J.D. Effect of different CdS morphologies on photocatalytic water splitting performance of CdS@ZIF-67 composites. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 58, 22021–22023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, H.; Yu, F.; Wang, Y.; Yin, L.X.; Li, J.Y.; Huang, J.F.; Kong, X.G.; Feng, Q. Building {0001} and {10 1 ¯ 1} facet heterojunctions on hexagonal pyramid CdS single crystals with high photoactivity and photostability for hydrogen evolution. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 426, 130777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ye, L.Q.; Ma, Z.Y.; Deng, Y.; Ye, Y.H.; Wang, L.; Kou, M.P.; Xie, H.Q.; Xu, Z.K.; Zhou, Y.; Xia, D.H.; et al. Robust and efficient photocatalytic hydrogen generation of ReS2/CdS and mechanistic study by on-line mass spectrometry and in situ infrared spectroscopy. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 257, 117897–117905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kuang, P.Y.; Zheng, P.X.; Liu, Z.Q.; Lei, J.L.; Wu, H.; Li, N.; Ma, T.Y. Embedding au quantum dots in rimous cadmium sulfide nanospheres for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Small 2016, 28, 6735–6744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liu, X.L.; Zhu, Y.J.; Cheng, G.F.; Huang, Y.H. SiO2/Cd(OH)2 composite nanotubes prepared by microwave-solvothermal transformation using water-dissolvable KCdCl3 nanowires as precursor and template. Mater. Lett. 2011, 65, 343–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yang, Z.X.; Zhong, W.; Yin, Y.X.; Du, X.; Deng, Y.; An, C.; Du, Y.W. Controllable synthesis of single-crystalline CdO and Cd(OH)2 nanowires by a simple hydrothermal approach. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2010, 5, 961–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Xu, J.X.; Yan, X.M.; Qi, Y.H.; Fu, Y.L.; Wang, C.; Wang, L. Novel phosphidated MoS2 nanosheets modified CdS semiconductor for an efficient photocatalytic H2 evolution. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 375, 122053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, H.; Ma, X.Y.; Ji, Y.J.; Xu, J.; Yang, D.R. Synthesis of cadmium hydroxide nanoflake and nanowisker by hydrothermal method. Mater. Lett. 2005, 59, 56–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chen, X.; Huang, X.; Kong, L.; Guo, Z.; Fu, X.; Li, M.; Liu, J. Walnut-like CdS micro-particles/single-walled carbon nanotube hybrids: One-step hydrothermal route to synthesis and their properties. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Russat, J. Characterization of polyamic acid/polyimide films in the nanometric thickness range from spin-deposited polyamic acid. Surf. Interface Anal. 1988, 11, 414–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Singh, N.; Charan, S.; Patil, K.R.; Viswanath, A.K.; Khanna, P.K. Unusual formation of nano-particles of CdO and Cd(OH)2 from the reaction of dimethyl cadmium with DMF. Mater. Lett. 2006, 60, 3492–3498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wu, Y.X.; Zhao, X.S.; Li, Y.H.; Ling, Y.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Zhang, X.Q.; Huang, S.B. New insights into the efficient charge transfer by construction of adjustable dominant facet of BiOI/CdS heterojunction for antibiotics degradation and chromium Cr(VI) reduction under visible-light irradiation. Chemosphere 2022, 302, 134862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chen, R.; Ao, Y.; Wang, P. Enhancing the hydrogen evolution performance of CdS by synergistic effect of Ni doping and SnO2 coupling: Improved efficiency of charge transfer and H2O disassociation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 6299–6309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hong, S.; Kumar, D.P.; Kim, E.H.; Park, H.; Gopannagari, M.; Reddy, D.A.; Kim, T.K. Earth abundant transition metal-doped few-layered MoS2 nanosheets on CdS nanorods for ultra-efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 20851–20859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 13 02453 g001
Figure 1. XRD patterns of a series of CdS samples.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of a series of CdS samples.
Nanomaterials 13 02453 g001
Nanomaterials 13 02453 g002
Figure 2. (a–c) TEM, HR-TEM and elemental mapping images of CdS-3; (d,e) TEM and HR-TEM results pure CdS sample.
Figure 2. (a–c) TEM, HR-TEM and elemental mapping images of CdS-3; (d,e) TEM and HR-TEM results pure CdS sample.
Nanomaterials 13 02453 g002
Nanomaterials 13 02453 g003
Figure 3. XPS results of pure CdS sample, (a) survey scan; high-resolution signals of (b) Cd 3d; (c) S 2p; (d) O 1s.
Figure 3. XPS results of pure CdS sample, (a) survey scan; high-resolution signals of (b) Cd 3d; (c) S 2p; (d) O 1s.
Nanomaterials 13 02453 g003
Nanomaterials 13 02453 g004
Figure 4. XPS results of CdS-3 sample, (a) survey scan; high-resolution signals of (b) Cd 3d; (c) S 2p; (d) O 1s.
Figure 4. XPS results of CdS-3 sample, (a) survey scan; high-resolution signals of (b) Cd 3d; (c) S 2p; (d) O 1s.
Nanomaterials 13 02453 g004
Nanomaterials 13 02453 g005
Figure 5. XPS results of CdS-1 and CdS-2 samples, (a) survey scan; high-resolution signals of (b) Cd 3d; (c) S 2p; (d) O 1s.
Figure 5. XPS results of CdS-1 and CdS-2 samples, (a) survey scan; high-resolution signals of (b) Cd 3d; (c) S 2p; (d) O 1s.
Nanomaterials 13 02453 g005
Nanomaterials 13 02453 g006
Figure 6. (a) Photocatalytic performance of CdS and a series of CdS-x (x = 1, 2 and 3) samples; (b) Recycling measurement of CdS-3 photocatalyst for HER.
Figure 6. (a) Photocatalytic performance of CdS and a series of CdS-x (x = 1, 2 and 3) samples; (b) Recycling measurement of CdS-3 photocatalyst for HER.
Nanomaterials 13 02453 g006
Nanomaterials 13 02453 g007
Figure 7. (a) Photocatalytic hydrogen generation over CdS-3 for 10 h; (b) XRD pattern of CdS-3 after photocatalytic reaction.
Figure 7. (a) Photocatalytic hydrogen generation over CdS-3 for 10 h; (b) XRD pattern of CdS-3 after photocatalytic reaction.
Nanomaterials 13 02453 g007
Nanomaterials 13 02453 g008
Figure 8. Photoelectric properties of CdS and CdS-3 photocatalysts, (a) DRS spectra; (b) PL spectra; (c) Transient photocurrent response; (d) EIS Nyquist plots; (e,f) Mott–Schottky characterization of CdS and CdS-3 samples.
Figure 8. Photoelectric properties of CdS and CdS-3 photocatalysts, (a) DRS spectra; (b) PL spectra; (c) Transient photocurrent response; (d) EIS Nyquist plots; (e,f) Mott–Schottky characterization of CdS and CdS-3 samples.
Nanomaterials 13 02453 g008
Nanomaterials 13 02453 g009
Figure 9. Proposed mechanism of the CdS-3 photocatalyst under the irradiation of visible light.
Figure 9. Proposed mechanism of the CdS-3 photocatalyst under the irradiation of visible light.
Nanomaterials 13 02453 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, R.; Qian, L.; Xu, S.; Wan, S.; Ma, M.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, R. In Situ Fabrication of CdS/Cd(OH)2 for Effective Visible Light-Driven Photocatalysis. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 2453. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13172453

AMA Style

Chen R, Qian L, Xu S, Wan S, Ma M, Zhang L, Jiang R. In Situ Fabrication of CdS/Cd(OH)2 for Effective Visible Light-Driven Photocatalysis. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(17):2453. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13172453

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Ran, Liping Qian, Shengyou Xu, Shunli Wan, Minghai Ma, Lei Zhang, and Runren Jiang. 2023. "In Situ Fabrication of CdS/Cd(OH)2 for Effective Visible Light-Driven Photocatalysis" Nanomaterials 13, no. 17: 2453. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13172453

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop