Next Article in Journal
Characterization and Comparison of WO3/WO3-MoO3 and TiO2/TiO2-ZnO Nanostructures for Photoelectrocatalytic Degradation of the Pesticide Imazalil
Next Article in Special Issue
Mitigating the Recrystallization of a Cold-Worked Cu-Al2O3 Nanocomposite via Enhanced Zener Drag by Nanocrstalline Cu-Oxide Particles
Previous Article in Journal
Healable Anti-Corrosive and Wear-Resistant Silicone-Oil-Impregnated Porous Oxide Layer of Aluminum Alloy by Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Study of Aerogel-Modified Recycled Polyurethane Nanocomposites

Nanomaterials 2023, 13(18), 2583; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13182583
by Xiaohua Gu 1,2,*, Shangwen Zhu 1, Siwen Liu 3 and Yan Liu 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(18), 2583; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13182583
Submission received: 11 July 2023 / Revised: 31 August 2023 / Accepted: 5 September 2023 / Published: 18 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design and Fabrication of Organic/Inorganic Nanocomposites, Volume II)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The comments are embedded in the PDF file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf


Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper deals with the quite important aspect of polymer technologies – recycling of polymer materials. The authors developed SiO2 aerogel-modified regenerated polyurethane composites and performed series of experiments to characterize their properties. The results obtained are interesting and worth of being published in Nanomaterials. However it needs some corrections.

The overall impression is that the manuscript is written not very carefully.

In particular:

Section 2.3, page 5.

-        Please indicate the amount of silica aerogel added to the polyurethane foam, rather than write “certain amount”

-        Third paragraph. Change the description of the preparation procedure from a recipe-style (Take, place, mix…) to the commonly used style (The amount was taken, placed, mixed etc.). Indicate the stirring rate.

-        Table 2. Replace “quality” by “quantity”.

Section 3.1, page 7.

-        First paragraph. As shown in Figure 4, rather than 2.

Section 3.2, page 7.

“…both silica aerogel specimen 2(a) and silica aerogel specimen 3 (b) have diffuse diffraction peaks of low intensity and low peaks…”

-        (a) and (b) are not specified in Fig. 5.

-        What do you mean under “low peaks”?

-        The Y-axis in Fig. 5 does not have units at all

Section 3.3. First paragraph

-        - Again please change the style of procedure description.

-        - Remove part of a phrase at the end of this paragraph.

Section 3.4.

-        “microstructure of the silica aerogel at 1 μm…” what means at 1 μm?

-        Figure 7. Images are not indicated as (a), (b)… Please specify in the figure caption what samples are imaged and what is indicated by red circles.

Section 3.5.

-        Figs 8 and 9. It would be better to combine these into a single figure as (a) and (b) parts and mention clearly in the text that (b) is the enlarged part of (a).

-        Last phrase in Fig. 9. What do you mean under “nanocomposites prepared from polyether 4110”? If I understood correctly this sample does not contain aerogel.

 Section 3.7.

-        Figure 11. Please indicate units in the X axis.

Section 3.8

-        What is “cool place”? Please indicate the temperature.

-        Figure 12. Remove the word “different” from the legend in the X axis.

-        Correct the first phrase in the paragraph below Fig. 12. It is not understandable.

End of Section 3.9.

-        Again remove the unnecesary part of a phrase.

Section 3.11

-        Indicate samples corresponding to the images in the figure caption.  The discussion of the images is too concise, please expand.

Conclusions Section

-        Please indicate the concentrations of silica aerogel corresponding to the obtained best parameters of the composites.

Please check the language and make necessary corrections.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors of the paper have responded correctly to my questions and suggestions. Therefore, the submitted article is accepted

The English language of the work is appropiate

Back to TopTop