Next Article in Journal
Metal-Promoted Higher-Order Assembly of Disulfide-Stapled Helical Barrels
Next Article in Special Issue
A Comprehensive Review on Electrocatalytic Applications of 2D Metallenes
Previous Article in Journal
Thermal, Mechanical, and Electrical Stability of Cu Films in an Integration Process with Photosensitive Polyimide (PSPI) Films
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Review of Yarn-Based One-Dimensional Supercapacitors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 13
Issue 19
10.3390/nano13192643
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Green Synthesis of NiFe2O4 Nano-Spinel Oxide-Decorated Carbon Nanotubes for Efficient Capacitive Performance—Effect of Electrolyte Concentration

by
Ali H. Bashal
1,
Mahmoud A. Hefnawy
2,*,
Hoda A. Ahmed
1,2,
Mohamed A. El-Atawy
1,3,
Rami Adel Pashameah
4 and
Shymaa S. Medany
2,*
1
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science at Yanbu, Taibah University, Yanbu 46423, Saudi Arabia
2
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt
3
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Ibrahemia, Alexandria 21321, Egypt
4
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Applied Science, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24230, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(19), 2643; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13192643
Submission received: 19 August 2023 / Revised: 19 September 2023 / Accepted: 22 September 2023 / Published: 26 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 2D and Carbon Nanomaterials for Energy Conversion and Storage)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Energy storage applications received great attention due to environmental aspects. A green method was used to prepare a composite of nickel–iron-based spinel oxide nanoparticle@CNT. The prepared materials were characterized by different analytical methods like X-ray diffraction, X-ray photon spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmitted electron microscopy (TEM). The synergistic effect between nickel–iron oxide and carbon nanotubes was characterized using different electrochemical methods like cyclic voltammetry (CV), galvanostatic charging/discharging (GCD), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The capacitances of the pristine NiFe2O4 and NiFe2O4@CNT were studied in different electrolyte concentrations. The effect of O H − concentrations was studied for modified and non-modified surfaces. Furthermore, the specific capacitance was estimated for pristine and modified NiFe2O4 at a wide current range (5 to 17 A g−1). Thus, the durability of different surfaces after 2000 cycles was studied, and the capacitance retention was estimated as 78.8 and 90.1% for pristine and modified NiFe2O4. On the other hand, the capacitance rate capability was observed as 65.1% (5 to 17 A g−1) and 62.4% (5 to 17 A g−1) for NiFe2O4 and NiFe2O4@CNT electrodes.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Renewable energy is becoming an increasingly important part of our lives as we strive to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels. With the help of renewable energy sources, such as solar, wind, and geothermal power, we can reduce our carbon footprint and create a more sustainable future. Renewable energy also has the potential to create jobs and stimulate economic growth in communities that are heavily reliant on fossil fuels. As we move toward a greener future, it is important to understand the various used cases of renewable energy and how they can benefit individuals and society [1,2,3,4].
A capacitor is an electrical component that stores energy as an electric field. It is used in many electronic circuits to store and release energy when needed [5,6,7,8,9]. Capacitors are widely used in various applications, from power supplies to audio equipment. They also filter out noise and interference from signals and provide a steady voltage supply for sensitive components. The capacity of a capacitor is determined by its size and fabricated material, so choosing the right type for your application is essential [10,11,12,13,14].
The nickel-based modified surface has recently been reported as an efficient material for electrochemical applications in basic media because it generates NiOOH electroactive species [15,16]. Thus, Ni-based materials are reported for applications like fuel cells, electrochemical sensors, and batteries [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26].
Spinel oxides with a typical structure of AB2O4 (where A and B are transition metals) are durable and robust materials for chemical and thermal changes that are widely used in different applications [27,28]. Metal spinel oxides may be classified into three categories: monometallic spinel oxides, bimetallic spinel oxides, and polymetallic spinel oxides. Magnetic spinel oxides have favorable characteristics in terms of their magnetic, electrical, and catalytic attributes, rendering them extensively employed in many domains such as magnetic materials, electronic devices, and catalysis, among others [29].
Spinel ferrites have garnered a lot of interest recently because of their many redox states, excellent electrochemical stability, and pseudo capacitive behavior. The spinel ferrites outperform other metal oxides in terms of operation voltage and theoretical capacity. However, because of its high surface energy and significant particle aggregation, its practical capacitance and cycling characteristic still require improvement, and creating pertinent composites appears to be a potential path to improving the electrochemical performance.
In recent years, NiFe2O4 has been employed for various applications like electrochemical sensors [23,30,31], water splitting [32,33,34], solar cells [35], and supercapacitors [36,37,38].
Carbon support materials were reported extensively for catalysis applications. High surface area, suitable electrical conductivity, and low toxicity are considered the most important points for using carbon materials to support modified surfaces. Different carbon materials were reported as proper support for transition metals-based modified surfaces like carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [39,40], graphene [41,42,43], graphene oxides [44], conducting polymer [45], chitosan [46,47], and porous carbon [48]. With their superior electronic conductivity and robust mechanical qualities, carbon nanotubes are frequently used as electrode materials for energy storage systems [49,50,51].
Consequently, several NiFe2O4-based surfaces are used for high capacitance application such as NiFe2O4/MoS2, rGO-NiFe2O4, and PANI-NiFe2O4 [52,53,54].
However, different approaches could be used for preparation of spinel oxides like hydrothermal, sol-gel, and coprecipitation. Thus, green approaches were recently reported in the literature to increase the sustainability of the preparation steps.
Several green plant extracts, including Terminalia Catappa, Tamarindus Indica seeds, and Urtica, have been widely reported for the production of nickel ferrite [55,56,57]. The botanical extract comprises various organic compounds that act as green-reducing and capping agents, such as phenolic compounds, flavonoids, carotenoids, and vitamins. Green tea extract is a commonly utilized substance in the production of metals due to its inclusion of diverse reducing and capping agents such as enzymes, polyphenols, and amino acids.
The concentration of, herein, NiFe2O4-decorated carbon nanotube composites was examined for enhancing the capacitance, in addition to the role and advantages that carbon nanotubes can provide to capacitor designs. The nickel ferrite was prepared using green methods. A comparative study was performed between pristine NiFe2O4 and NiFe2O4@CNT. Different analytical approaches characterized the prepared materials. The effect of electrolyte concentration was studied, whereas galvanostatic charging/discharging was utilized at wide current density ranges. The durability of the electrode was investigated using repeated charging and discharging cycles. EIS was employed to determine the charge transfer resistance for pristine and modified NiFe2O4 surfaces for different electrolyte concentrations.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Green Synthesis of NiFe2O4

The preparation of the green tea extract involved the boiling of green tea leaves in 100 mL of distilled water. Subsequently, the solution was subjected to cooling and filtration procedures, followed by transferal into a sterile container. The precursor salts of Fe(NO3)3.9H2O and Ni(NO3)2.6H2O were dissolved in a 2:1 molar ratio in 50 mL of deionized water. The process involved gradually adding green tea leaf extract into the precursor solutions, followed by heating to 80 °C with intense agitation. Subsequently, the fluid was subjected to thermal energy until a solid-like substance was produced. The gel underwent a drying process for a duration of two hours at a temperature of 150 °C in an oven. The specimens underwent a four-hour annealing process at a temperature of 600 °C.

2.2. Electrode Preparation and Electrochemical Measurements

The experimental setup utilized a working electrode in the form of a glassy carbon electrode (GC) with a diameter of 3 mm and a surface area of 0.0707 cm2. The initial step involved the use of a mild emery paper for polishing, followed by a thorough cleansing process utilizing ethanol and double-distilled water. Two catalyst inks were produced through the dispersion of 60 mg of pristine NiFe2O4 and 60 mg of NiFe2O4@CNT (with a NiFe2O4: CNT ratio of 1:1) in a solution comprising 1 mL of ethanol and 1 mL of 5 wt% Nafion. This facilitated the uniform distribution of NiFe2O4 on every electrode. Subsequently, a volume of 50 µL of ink was deposited onto the surface of the glassy carbon electrode and subjected to desiccation overnight. The catalyst loading was determined to be 1.5 mg. Consequently, the modified surfaces that were prepared, namely pristine NiFe2O4 and NiFe2O4@CNT, were denoted as NFO and NFO@CNT, respectively.
Autolab PGSTAT128N was utilized to acquire data through cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and galvanostatic charging/discharging. The electrochemistry tests and impedance spectrum fitting were conducted using NOVA software (Version 2.1, Metrohm Autolab, Utrecht, The Netherlands). A three-electrode cell was employed, with Ag/AgCl/KCl (sat.) serving as the reference electrode, Pt wire as the counter electrode, and GC/NiFe2O4 and GC/NiFe2O4@CNT as the working electrodes. The computation of all conceivable values in this study was executed utilizing reference electrodes of Ag/AgCl/KCl (sat.). The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements were adjusted to a consistent AC voltage value by utilizing an AC voltage amplitude of 10 mV and a frequency range spanning from 104 Hz to 0.1 Hz.
The following equation was used to compute the specific capacitances of supercapacitors during discharge:
C = I   ∆ T m   ∆ V  
The specific capacitance (C) was determined using the discharging current (I), the time required for discharging (∆T), the mass of modified surface (m), and the potential window (∆V).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Material Characterization

The Powder X-ray diffraction technique characterized the chemical structure of the prepared NiFe2O4. An XRD chart of the NiFe2O4 is illustrated in Figure 1a. According to reference card JCPDS No.54-0964, seven characteristic peaks were observed for NiFe2O4 at 2θ = 22.5, 30.2, 35.3, 36.4, 43.2, 53.7, 57.4, and 63.2°, corresponding to miller indices (111), (220), (311), (222), (400), (422), (511), and (440), respectively. The estimated crystal system of NiFe2O4 is cubic with crystal point group m 3 - m.
Furthermore, X-ray photon spectroscopy (XPS) characterized the oxidation states and types of bonds between atoms. Figure 1b shows an introductory survey of the NiFe2O4, which displays the presence of Ni, Fe, O, and C at a binding energy of 857.38, 712.35, 285.81, and 532.07 eV, respectively. The XPS spectra of the NiFe2O4 elements are displayed in Figure 1c–f. As shown in Figure 1c, Ni2P spectra were observed to have characteristic peaks at 855.5 and 857.76 eV, corresponding to 2p3/2 Ni+2 and Ni+3 peaks. The peaks observed at 862.1 and 865.62 were due to satellite of Ni 2p3/2 [58]. The peaks observed at 873.15, 876.67, and 880.14 eV were also attributed to Ni 2p1/2 and its satellites. Figure 1d displays the XPS spectra of the 2p core level of Fe. The spectra showed Fe2p signals at 710.69 and 713.08 eV, which are attributed to Fe2p3/2. Furthermore, peaks were observed at 716.47 and 719.88 eV for 2p3/2 satellites [59]. The peaks at binding energies of 724.34, 727.79, and 732.61 eV are attributed to Fe2p1/2 and its satellite.
The origin of oxygenated Ni and Fe bonds can be ascribed by the peaks at 530.28 and 531.87 eV in Figure 1e. The peak observed at a binding energy of 532.91 eV is attributed to the water molecules that were adsorbed on the surface of the catalyst [60]. Figure 1f depicts the C1s spectra. Three distinct peaks were detected in the C1s spectra at binding energies of 284.83, 285.32, and 288.58 electron volts. The spectral peaks detected at 284.83 and 285.32 electron volts are indicative of a carbonaceous layer that is typically present on the surfaces of air-exposed samples. The third peak observed at a binding energy of 288.58 eV indicates the existence of metal carbonate, as reported in previous studies [61,62].
A scanning electron microscope characterized the surface morphology of the modified GC/NFO@CNT electrode. Figure 2a shows a modified GC/NFO@CNT. Thus, NiFe2O4 was observed to decorate the carbon nanotube. The cavity within the surface of NFO@CNT promotes the diffusion of O H − . The well distribution of NFO on the CNT surface led to higher efficiency. Additionally, the structure stability after cycling was characterized using SEM (see Figure 2b). The particle coagulated after cycling due to the deterioration of nickel ferrite after several Ni(OH)2/NiOOH conversions.
The morphological structure and nanoparticle distribution were characterized using a transmitted electron microscope (TEM). The TEM image of the NFO@CNT sample is represented in Figure 2c. The average particle size is estimated to be in the range of 13~25 nm. For comparison between pristine and modified NiFe2O4 surfaces, TEM of unmodified NiFe2O4 was characterized using TEM (see Figure 2d)
Additionally, the prepared materials were confirmed using the TEM diffraction pattern, as shown in Figure 2e. However, the miller indices were estimated for different d-spacing values in reference card JCPDS No.54-0964. EDAX estimated the elemental analysis of NFO@CNT. Thus, the EDAX shows the presence of Ni, Fe, O, and C. The elemental compositions of the NFO@CNT sample are shown in Figure 2f. Thus, the elemental percentage shown in the inset figure matches with our target structure of NiFe2O4, as the ratio between Ni and Fe is found as 1/2.

3.2. Electrochemical Characterization

The electrochemical studies of the modified GC/NFO and GC/NFO@CNT were studied in an alkaline medium. At the same time, the capacitive properties of the different modified electrodes were studied at different electrolyte concentrations. Since the capacitance performance of nickel-based electrodes in an alkaline medium mainly depends on the conversion of Ni(OH)2 to NiOOH, modified electrodes were activated in 1.0 M KOH using repeated CVs until the resultant current showed a stable response. Figure 3a,b show CVs of the modified GC/NFO and GC/NFO@CNT electrodes in a solution of KOH at different concentrations. One redox peak observed at (0.2 to 0.4 V (vs. Ag/AgCl)) is attributed to the Ni(OH)2/NiOOH redox couple. The increase in the oxidation/reduction current was observed due to the dependent of the O H − ions for the generation of redox species, according to the following equation [45,63]:
6 Ni ( OH ) 2 + 6   O H − ↔ 6 NiOOH + 6 H 2 O
Accordingly, the redox peak shifted to a more negative value by increasing the electrolyte concentration, and the electrochemical reaction tended to be more thermodynamically favored.
By comparison, the addition of CNT to the NFO nano-spinel oxide enhanced the faradic process by increasing available surface area and electrical conductivity. Furthermore, the metal-oxide-decorated CNT was reported to have efficient activity compared to pristine counterparts like ZnWO4@CNT, NiCo2O4@CNT, and Co3O4/CNT [64,65,66].
Figure 4 shows the modified GC/NFO@CNT electrode CVs at different electrolyte concentrations (0.1 to 2.0 M KOH). The scan rate was changed in the range of 5–200 mV s−1. The diffusion coefficient of OH anions was studied using Randles–Sevcik equation:
ip = 2.69 × 105 × n3/2 × A × D1/2C × ν1/2
where ip: peak current, A: electrode geometrical area, n: electron participated in a redox reaction, C: concentration of KOH, D: diffusion coefficient, and ν: scan rate.
Accordingly, the diffusion coefficient for the modified electrode was estimated using the linear relation between the anodic and cathodic peak currents and the square root of the scan rate (see Figure 5a). The average diffusion coefficient was provided for each concentration as 1.65 × 1 0 − 5 , 3.55 × 1 0 − 5 , 4.62 × 1 0 − 5 , and 6.41 × 1 0 − 5 cm2 s−1 for 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 M KOH, respectively. For the GC/NFO@CNT electrode, diffusion of OH ions increased versus concentration in the range of 0.1 to 1.0 M. In comparison, the diffusion at a concentration of 2.0 M is lower due to the columbic repulsion between the similarly charged ions.
For mixed capacitance mechanism, the following equation could be used [8,42]:
i = s × νw
where i is current at characteristic potential, ν is sweep rate, and s and w are constants. However, the value of w represents the mechanism. The w-value indicates the charge storage mechanism with a value ranging from 0.5 to 1.0. Figure 5b shows the relation between the natural logarithm of scan rate and the natural logarithm of peak current. The values of w were provided as 0.54, 0.57, 0.67, and 0.68 for concentrations of 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 M, respectively. The estimated value of w indicates that the GC/NFO electrode storage mechanism tends to be mixed between bulk faradic and capacitive. Also, the increase in electrolyte concentration led to a shift in mechanism toward a more faradic process due to the availability of hydroxide ions in the solution, which is essential for the conversion of the redox system of Ni-based surfaces.
The functionality of the modified GC/NFO electrode was examined in several KOH solutions. Figure 6 shows the CVs of the modified GC/NFO electrode at various scan rates (5 to 200 mV s−1) in various alkaline medium ranges (0.1 to 2.0 M). Increased scan rates of CNT-based composites impact the delineation of the NiOOH/Ni(OH)2 redox peak when compared to NFO@CNT. As opposed to the faradic current, the presence of CNTs increased the capacitive current.
Since Randles–Sevcik relation should take the diffusion of O H − into account, the anticipated diffusion coefficients for modified GC/NFO electrodes are 6.33 × 1 0 − 6 , 1.87 × 10−5, 2.84 × 1 0 − 5 , and 3.44 × 1 0 − 5 cm2 s−1 for 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 M, respectively. For comparison, the mixed capacitance was calculated using the relation shown in Figure 7b and Equation (4). The slope of w was calculated to be 0.48, 0.51, 0.57, and 0.53 for electrolyte concentrations of 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 M, respectively. Therefore, the supplied value of the b slopes suggested that the bulk faradic process was used as the storage mechanism on the modified GC/NFO electrode.
Galvanostatic charging and discharging techniques were used to characterize the charging and discharging of electrode surfaces. GCD techniques for modified GC/NFO@CNT at various electrolyte concentrations are shown in Figure 8a–d. To prevent oxygen evolution, the charging/discharging test occurred in the potential window of 0 to 0.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl. Otherwise, a charging current in the range of 5 to 17 A g−1 was picked. The charging and discharging times where the faradic process is accelerated by increasing the available O H − species can be increased by raising the KOH concentration. The modified electrode GC/NFO@CNT showed capacitance at 1.0 M KOH as 1169, 1007, 898, 800, 771, and 730 F g−1 for 5, 7, 10, 13, 15, and 17 A g−1, respectively. The computed capacitance for the modified electrode is listed in Table 1.
The charging–discharging ability was investigated in different KOH concentration ranges to compare CNT-modified and pristine NFOs. Figure 9 shows GCD curves of the GC/NFO electrode at different current ranges 5–17 A g−1 in ranges of KOH concentration (0.1 to 2.0 M). Specific capacitance was calculated for 1.0 M KOH concentrations as follows: 450, 366, 344, 328, 311, and 295 F g−1 for 5, 7, 10, 13, 15, and 17 A g−1, respectively. Thus, the increase in KOH concentration enhanced the capacitance of the modified electrode due to the enhancement of available OH ions that are essential for the NiOOH/Ni(OH)2 redox reaction.
Figure 10 shows the relation between the charging current and capacitance of different electrode surfaces in various electrolyte concentrations. Thus, change in capacitance with the current was illustrated for GC/NFO@CNT (see Figure 10a). This is provided that rate capabilities for different electrolytes are 58, 63, 62, and 68% for 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 M, respectively. Figure 10b displays the relation between capacitance and current for modified GC/NFO electrodes. The rate capabilities are estimated as 53, 67, 65, and 70% for 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 M, respectively. Reduced charge and discharge times, which restrict charge diffusion in the films, may be owed to the drop in specific capacitance observed at high current densities [67].
Furthermore, the durability of the capacitor performance is considered an essential factor in judging the prepared materials. As represented in Figure 11a, the stability tests for modified GC/NFO@CNT and GC/NFO electrodes were carried out in a solution of 1.0 M KOH at the charging–discharging current of 10 A g−1 cm−2. For both electrodes, the capacitance retentions were estimated as 90.1 and 78.8% for GC/NFO@CNT and GC/NFO, respectively. Furthermore, the coulombic efficiencies of different modified electrodes were studied to evaluate the electrode performances. Figure 11b shows a slight decrease in efficiency after 2000 cycles. Thus, the GC/NFO@CNT efficiency decreased by 5% compared to 6.5% for GC/NFO counterparts.
The higher stability of CNT-modified composites regards outstanding properties of CNTs in capacitance applications. Higher adsorption/desorption of O H − on CNTs promotes the faradic process of Ni-based surfaces. Furthermore, GCD for the different modified surfaces is represented in Figure 11c,d. After repeated cycling, a lower IR drop was observed. Furthermore, there were higher charging and discharging times for activation of the additional Ni centers. The outcomes of the modified GC/NFO and GC/NFO@CNT were compared to other modified electrodes reported in the literature, as listed in Table 1.
Additionally, modified GC/NFO@CNT and pristine GC/NFO were compared using a Ragone plot (Figure 12). The increases in both energy density and power density were observed with electrolyte concentration. Whereas, the highest power and energy densities were observed at 2.0 M of KOH. The provided values of energy density and power density were (11.2 Wh kg−1, 330 W kg−1) and (30.2 Wh kg−1, 357 W kg−1) for pristine and modified NFO, respectively.
Table 1. Capacitance performance comparison between GC/NFO and others reported in the literature.
Table 1. Capacitance performance comparison between GC/NFO and others reported in the literature.
ElectrodePreparationElectrolytesPotential Window
(V)		Cs/F g−1Rate CapabilityStability (Cycle/Current)Ref.
GC/NFOGreen method 1.0 M KOH0.32450 (5 A g−1)65.1% (5 to 17 A g−1)78.8% (2000 cycles at 10 A g−1)This work
GC/NFO@CNTGreen method1.0 M KOH0.41169 (at 5 A g−1)62.4% (5 to 17 A g−1)90.1% (2000 cycles at 10 A g−1)This work
Fe-MnO2Hydrothermal0.5 M Na2SO41.0145 F g−1 (1 A g−1)71.4% (1 to 10 A g−1)95.9% (5000 cycles at 3 A g−1)[68]
Ni–Co double hydroxideElectrodeposition6.0 M KOH0.451246 F g−1 (1 A g−1)91.8% (1 to 10 A g−1)80.1% (1000 cycles at 10 A g−1)[69]
CoNiFe-layered double hydroxideIn situ growth method6.0 M KOH0.41203 F g−1 (1 A g−1)77.1% (1 to 10 A g−1)94% (1000 cycles at 20 A g−1)[70]
MnO2@CNTs/CNTsVacuum filtration1 M Na2SO41.0149 (0.2 A g−1)85% (0.2 to 5 A g−1)90% (5000 cycles at 50 mV s−1[71]
Fe-MnO2@ CNFChemical1 M Na2SO41.0210 (0.3 A g−1)83% (0.3 to 10 A g−1)94% (4500 cycles at 2 A g−1)[72]
RGO/Fe2O3Chemical 2.0 M KOH1.1469.5 (4 A g−1)49% (4 to 8 A g−1)88% (5000 cycles at 8 A g−1)[73]
The improvement of the modified surface was obtained using the electrochemical impedance technique. Comparative studies were employed to find out the effect of the addition of CNTs to an NFO composite. Thus, Figure 13a represents a Nyquist plot of the modified GC/NFO@CNT electrode for different electrolyte concentrations. The shift in starting impedance values is attributed to a decrease in solution resistance with electrolyte concentrations. Additionally, the obtained EIS data for the GC/NFO@CNT surface indicated the mixing of charge transfer and diffusion processes. Whereas, the EIS data fitting uses NOVA software, as referenced in Figure 13a inset. The equivalent circuit deduced for GC/NFO@CNT contained two resistances referring to solution resistance and charge transfer resistance. The presence of a constant phase element indicated the surface roughness or inhomogeneous distribution over the electrode surface. Relatedly, diffusion elements are connected in series with charge transfer cell. The fitting parameters for the modified GC/NFO@CNT surface are listed in Table 2.
Figure 13b shows Nyquist plots of EIS measurements of GC/NFO in different concentrations of KOH. EIS results were fitted using NOVA software. The diameter of the semi-circuit Nyquist plot reflects the electrode’s activity toward the faradic redox process. Thus, increasing the concentration of the supporting electrolytes shifted the solution resistance toward a lower value. Therefore, provided solution resistances for the GC/NFO electrode were 4.14 and 2.28 Ω cm2 for 0.1 and 2.0 M KOH, respectively.
Additionally, Nyquist data were fitted as represented in the circuit-illustrated inset in Figure 13b. The fitting circuit included Rs, corresponding to the resistance of the solution, R1, and R2, attributed to the outer and inner layer resistances, respectively. Relatedly, Q1 and Q2 can be established as constant phase elements for the outer and inner surfaces, respectively. The estimated EIS parameters for modified GC/NFO electrodes in different KOH concentrations are listed in Table 3. Whereas, higher KOH concentrations lead to higher faradic currents and consequently lower charge transfer resistances.

4. Conclusions

The capacitance of nickel–iron-based spinel oxide in an alkaline medium was estimated. Comparative studies between pristine NiFe2O4 and NiFe2O4@CNT showed the dramatic effect of CNTs as carbon support for enhancing the faradic process of nickel. The extended surface area, along with high electron transfer, facilitated the Ni(OH)2/NiOOH redox process. The diffusion coefficients utilized by Randles–Sevcik equation were 2.84 × 10−5 and 4.62 × 10−5 cm2 s−1 for pristine and modified NiFe2O4 electrodes.
The effect of electrolyte concentrations was studied for pristine and CNT-modified NiFe2O4. Whereas, the capacitance increased by 46 up to 82% by increasing the electrolyte from 0.1 to 2.0 M KOH.
On the other hand, the capacitance rate capability was observed as 65.1% (5 to 17 A g−1) and 62.4% (5 to 17 A g−1) for NiFe2O4 and NiFe2O4@CNT electrodes. Both pristine and CNT-modified surfaces showed high stability after 2000 cycles. Furthermore, the redox process was estimated using EIS. The charge transfer resistances were estimated in 2 M KOH as 3.43 and 12.79 Ω cm2 for GC/NiFe2O4@CNT and GC/NiFe2O4, respectively.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, M.A.H., S.S.M., A.H.B., M.A.E.-A., R.A.P. and H.A.A.; funding acquisition, M.A.H., S.S.M., A.H.B., M.A.E.-A., R.A.P. and H.A.A.; methodology, M.A.H., S.S.M., H.A.A. and R.A.P.; data curation, M.A.H., H.A.A. and S.S.M.; conceptualization, S.S.M. and M.A.H.; validation, S.S.M. and M.A.H.; project administration, A.H.B., M.A.E.-A., R.A.P. and H.A.A.; resources and software, S.S.M. and M.A.H.; writing—original draft, S.S.M. and M.A.H.; writing—review and editing, M.A.H., S.S.M., A.H.B., M.A.E.-A., R.A.P. and H.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Deputyship for Research and Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia through the project number 445-9-353.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research and Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project number 445-9-353.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Xiang, Q.; Ma, X.; Zhang, D.; Zhou, H.; Liao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Xu, S.; Levchenko, I.; Bazaka, K. Interfacial modification of titanium dioxide to enhance photocatalytic efficiency towards H2 production. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 556, 376–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Li, W.; Tian, X.; Li, X.; Liu, J.; Li, C.; Feng, X.; Shu, C.; Yu, Z.-Z. An environmental energy-enhanced solar steam evaporator derived from MXene-decorated cellulose acetate cigarette filter with ultrahigh solar steam generation efficiency. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 606, 748–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Eliwa, A.S.; Hefnawy, M.A.; Medany, S.S.; Deghadi, R.G.; Hosny, W.M.; Mohamed, G.G. Synthesis and characterization of lead-based metal–organic framework nano-needles for effective water splitting application. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 12531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yan, S.; Luo, S.; Feng, J.; Yang, L.; Li, P.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Chang, L. Asymmetric, Flexible Supercapacitor Based on Fe–Co Alloy@Sulfide with High Energy and Power Density. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 49952–49963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Deng, B.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yin, B.; Yang, M. A hierarchically combined reduced graphene oxide/Nickel oxide hybrid supercapacitor device demonstrating compliable flexibility and high energy density. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 618, 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, W.; Xu, J.; Hou, D.; Yin, J.; Liu, D.; He, Y.; Lin, H. Hierarchical porous carbon prepared from biomass through a facile method for supercapacitor applications. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 530, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dong, D.; Zhang, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, T.; Wang, J.; Romero, C.E.; Pan, W. High performance aqueous supercapacitor based on nitrogen-doped coal-based activated carbon electrode materials. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 580, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yan, S.; Wang, Q.; Luo, S.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Hao, A.; Yi, T. Coal-based S hybrid self-doped porous carbon for high-performance supercapacitors and potassium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2020, 461, 228151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yan, S.; Luo, S.; Liu, H.; Yang, L.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X. In-situ partial reduction-sulfurized Fe3O4@ FeS based on pickling iron red as a versatile electrode for high-performance lithium ion batteries and supercapacitor devices. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2022, 429, 127980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sagadevan, S.; Marlinda, A.R.; Johan, M.R.; Umar, A.; Fouad, H.; Alothman, O.Y.; Khaled, U.; Akhtar, M.S.; Shahid, M.M. Reduced graphene/nanostructured cobalt oxide nanocomposite for enhanced electrochemical performance of supercapacitor applications. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 558, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Maruthamani, D.; Vadivel, S.; Kumaravel, M.; Saravanakumar, B.; Paul, B.; Dhar, S.S.; Habibi-Yangjeh, A.; Manikandan, A.; Ramadoss, G. Fine cutting edge shaped Bi2O3rods/reduced graphene oxide (RGO) composite for supercapacitor and visible-light photocatalytic applications. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 498, 449–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wu, Y.; Chen, H.; Lu, Y.; Yang, J.; Zhu, X.; Zheng, Y.; Lou, G.; Wu, Y.; Wu, Q.; Shen, Z. Rational design of cobalt–nickel double hydroxides for flexible asymmetric supercapacitor with improved electrochemical performance. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 581, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Younas, W.; Naveed, M.; Cao, C.; Zhu, Y.; Du, C.; Ma, X.; Mushtaq, N.; Tahir, M.; Naeem, M. Facile one-step microwave-assisted method to synthesize nickel selenide nanosheets for high-performance hybrid supercapacitor. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 608, 1005–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sui, D.; Yao, M.; Si, L.; Yan, K.; Shi, J.; Wang, J.; Xu, C.C.; Zhang, Y. Biomass-derived carbon coated SiO2 nanotubes as superior anode for lithium-ion batteries. Carbon 2023, 205, 510–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hefnawy, M.A.; Medany, S.S.; El-Sherif, R.M.; El-Bagoury, N.; Fadlallah, S.A. High-performance IN738 superalloy derived from turbine blade waste for efficient ethanol, ethylene glycol, and urea electrooxidation. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2023, 53, 1337–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Eliwa, A.S.; Hefnawy, M.A.; Medany, S.S.; Deghadi, R.G.; Hosny, W.M.; Mohamed, G.G. Ultrasonic-assisted synthesis of nickel metal-organic framework for efficient urea removal and water splitting applications. Synth. Met. 2023, 294, 117309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Moraveji, S.; Fotouhi, L.; Zirak, M.; Shahrokhian, S. Bimetallic nickel-cobalt nanospheres electrodeposited on nickel foam as a battery-type electrode material for fabrication of asymmetric supercapacitors. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 946, 169409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lorenzo, C.; Bouquain, D.; Hibon, S.; Hissel, D. Synthesis of degradation mechanisms and of their impacts on degradation rates on proton-exchange membrane fuel cells and lithium-ion nickel–manganese–cobalt batteries in hybrid transport applications. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2021, 212, 107369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Samant, P.V.; Fernandes, J.B. Nickel-modified manganese oxide as an active electrocatalyst for oxidation of methanol in fuel cells. J. Power Sources 1999, 79, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, H.; Liang, M.; Ma, H.; Zhang, H.; Ma, C.; Duan, W.; Zhao, Y.; Miao, Z. Defect-rich Ni3S4−x as a robust electrode material for supercapacitor and aqueous Ni-Zn battery applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 933, 167733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Karuppiah, K.; Vaidyanathan, R.; Lakshmanan, S.P.; Rajendran, K.; Dhandapani, P.; Venkatesan, S.; Suresh, K.; Rajaraman, V. Synthesis, characterization and electrochemical investigation on nickel manganese oxide-Polybutylene Sebacate composite electrode of biodegradable nature for micro capacitor applications. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2023, 100, 100896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yan, S.; Luo, S.; Sun, M.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X. Facile hydrothermal synthesis of urchin-like NiCo2O4 as advanced electrochemical pseudocapacitor materials. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 20186–20198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hefnawy, M.A.; Fadlallah, S.A.; El-Sherif, R.M.; Medany, S.S. Competition between enzymatic and non-enzymatic electrochemical determination of cholesterol. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2023, 930, 117169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hefnawy, M.A.; Fadlallah, S.A.; El-Sherif, R.M.; Medany, S.S. Systematic DFT studies of CO-Tolerance and CO oxidation on Cu-doped Ni surfaces. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2023, 118, 108343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Al-Kadhi, N.S.; Hefnawy, M.A.; Alamro, F.S.; Pashameah, R.A.; Ahmed, H.A.; Medany, S.S. Polyaniline-Supported Nickel Oxide Flower for Efficient Nitrite Electrochemical Detection in Water. Polymers 2023, 15, 1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, X.; Wang, Q.; Liu, B.; Zhong, C.; Hu, W. Facile synthesis of uniformly coated ZnO@ Bi2O3 composites anode for long-cycle-life zinc–nickel battery. J. Energy Storage 2023, 58, 106350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cox, P.A. Transition Metal Oxides: An Introduction to Their Electronic Structure and Properties; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  28. Medany, S.S.; Hefnawy, M.A. Nickel–cobalt oxide decorated Chitosan electrocatalyst for ethylene glycol oxidation. Surf. Interfaces 2023, 40, 103077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lin, S.; Zhang, T. Research progress in preparation and application of spinel-type metallic oxides (M ≥ 2). J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 962, 171117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Van Hoang, N.; Hiep, N.T.; Hung, N.M.; Nguyen, C.V.; Hung, P.T.; Hoat, P.D.; Heo, Y.-W. Optimization of synthesis conditions and sensing performance of electrospun NiFe2O4 nanofibers for H2S and NO2 detection. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 936, 168276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sankaranarayanan, R.; Shailajha, S.; Seema, S.; Kairon Mubina, M.S. Enhanced Magneto-Electric Properties of ZnAl2O4@ NiFe2O4 Nanocomposites in Magnetic Sensor Applications. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2023, 36, 693–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tian, W.; Li, L.; Zhu, G. Interface Engineering of Oxygen-Vacancy-Rich VO-NiFe2O4@ Ni2P Heterostructure for Highly Efficient Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Catal. Lett. 2023, 36, 693–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jia, L.; Du, G.; Han, D.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, W.; Su, Q.; Ding, S.; Xu, B. Magnetic electrode configuration with polypyrrole-wrapped Ni/NiFe2O4 core–shell nanospheres to boost electrocatalytic water splitting. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 454, 140278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, X.; Luo, J.; Tuo, Y.; Gu, Y.; Liu, W.; Wang, S.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, J. Hierarchical heterostructure of NiFe2O4 nanoflakes grown on the tip of NiCo2O4 nanoneedles with enhanced interfacial polarization effect to achieve highly efficient electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 457, 141169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mao, J.; He, B.; Sui, H.; Cui, L.; Chen, H.; Duan, Y.; Yang, P.; Tang, Q. Interfacial modification of in-situ polymerized AMPS/NiFe2O4 quantum dots for efficient and air-stable CsPbBr3 perovskite solar cells. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 461, 141943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kumar, S.; Hashmi, S.Z.; Srivastava, G.; Singh, J.; Quraishi, A.M.; Dalela, S.; Ahmed, F.; Alvi, P.A. Synthesis and investigations of structural, surface morphology, electrochemical, and electrical properties of NiFe2O4 nanoparticles for usage in supercapacitors. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2023, 34, 868. [Google Scholar]
  37. Manzoor, S.; Alburaih, H.A.; Nisa, M.U.; Aman, S.; Abdullah, M.; Abid, A.G. A novel porous rod with nanosphere CuS2/NiFe2O4 nanocomposite for low-cost high-performance energy storage system. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2023, 34, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, Y.; Yang, T.; Yue, S.; Zheng, H.; Liu, X.; Gao, P.; Qin, H.; Xiao, H. Effects of Alternating Magnetic Fields on the OER of Heterogeneous Core–Shell Structured NiFe2O4@(Ni, Fe) S/P. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 11631–11641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Luo, C.; Xie, H.; Wang, Q.; Luo, G.; Liu, C. A review of the application and performance of carbon nanotubes in fuel cells. J. Nanomater. 2015, 2015, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hefnawy, M.A.; Nafady, A.; Mohamed, S.K.; Medany, S.S. Facile green synthesis of Ag/carbon nanotubes composite for efficient water splitting applications. Synth. Met. 2023, 294, 117310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, S.; Xu, P.; Tian, J.; Liu, Z.; Feng, L. Phase structure tuning of graphene supported Ni-NiO Nanoparticles for enhanced urea oxidation performance. Electrochim. Acta. 2021, 370, 137755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yan, S.; Luo, S.; Feng, J.; Li, P.; Guo, R.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Bao, S. Rational design of flower-like FeCo2S4/reduced graphene oxide films: Novel binder-free electrodes with ultra-high conductivity flexible substrate for high-performance all-solid-state pseudocapacitor. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 381, 122695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hu, T.; Sun, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, H.; Dong, X.; Zheng, J.; Meng, C.; Huang, C. PVA-assisted hydrated vanadium pentoxide/reduced graphene oxide films for excellent Li+ and Zn2+ storage properties. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021, 83, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Munde, A.V.; Mulik, B.B.; Chavan, P.P.; Sathe, B.R. Enhanced electrocatalytic activity towards urea oxidation on Ni nanoparticle decorated graphene oxide nanocomposite. Electrochim. Acta. 2020, 349, 136386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hefnawy, M.A.; Medany, S.S.; El-Sherif, R.M.; Fadlallah, S.A. NiO-MnOx/Polyaniline/Graphite Electrodes for Urea Electrocatalysis: Synergetic Effect between Polymorphs of MnOx and NiO. ChemistrySelect 2022, 7, e202103735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Alamro, F.S.; Hefnawy, M.A.; Nafee, S.S.; Al-Kadhi, N.S.; Pashameah, R.A.; Ahmed, H.A.; Medany, S.S. Chitosan Supports Boosting NiCo2O4 for Catalyzed Urea Electrochemical Removal Application. Polymers 2023, 15, 3058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Al-Kadhi, N.S.; Hefnawy, M.A.; Nafee, S.S.; Alamro, F.S.; Pashameah, R.A.; Ahmed, H.A.; Medany, S.S. Zinc Nanocomposite Supported Chitosan for Nitrite Sensing and Hydrogen Evolution Applications. Polymers 2023, 15, 2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yan, S.; Luo, S.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X. Rational design of hierarchically sulfide and MXene-reinforced porous carbon nanofibers as advanced electrode for high energy density flexible supercapacitors. Compos. Part B Eng. 2021, 224, 109246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhong, Y.; Gu, F.; Wu, L.; Wang, J.; Dai, S.; Zhu, H.; Cheng, G.; Ding, J. Porous conductive electrode for highly sensitive flexible capacitive pressure sensor over a wide range. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 934, 167919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ding, L.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Du, Y.; Liu, H.; Guo, Y. A novel hydrochar and nickel composite for the electrochemical supercapacitor electrode material. Mater. Lett. 2012, 74, 111–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, S.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, L.; Wang, J.; Zhang, L.; Shi, M.; Chen, X. Ultra-stable sandwich shaped flexible MXene/CNT@Ni films for high performance supercapacitor. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 941, 168963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cai, Y.-Z.; Cao, W.-Q.; Zhang, Y.-L.; He, P.; Shu, J.-C.; Cao, M.-S. Tailoring rGO-NiFe2O4 hybrids to tune transport of electrons and ions for supercapacitor electrodes. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 811, 152011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhao, Y.; Xu, L.; Yan, J.; Yan, W.; Wu, C.; Lian, J.; Huang, Y.; Bao, J.; Qiu, J.; Xu, L. Facile preparation of NiFe2O4/MoS2 composite material with synergistic effect for high performance supercapacitor. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 726, 608–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Senthilkumar, B.; Sankar, K.V.; Sanjeeviraja, C.; Selvan, R.K. Synthesis and physico-chemical property evaluation of PANI–NiFe2O4 nanocomposite as electrodes for supercapacitors. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 553, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Naik, M.M.; Vinuth, M.; Kumar, V.U.; Hemakumar, K.H.; Preethi, G.; Kumar, M.P.; Nagaraju, G. A facile green synthesis of nickel ferrite nanoparticles using Tamarindus Indica seeds for magnetic and photocatalytic studies. Nanotechnol. Environ. Eng. 2023, 8, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Amiri, M.; Pardakhti, A.; Ahmadi-Zeidabadi, M.; Akbari, A.; Salavati-Niasari, M. Magnetic nickel ferrite nanoparticles: Green synthesis by Urtica and therapeutic effect of frequency magnetic field on creating cytotoxic response in neural cell lines. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2018, 172, 244–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sarala, E.; Vinuth, M.; Naik, M.M.; Reddy, Y.V.R. Green synthesis of nickel ferrite nanoparticles using Terminalia catappa: Structural, magnetic and anticancer studies against MCF-7 cell lines. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2022, 8, 100150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yang, Y.; Tao, Q.; Srinivasan, G.; Takoudis, C.G. Cyclic chemical vapor deposition of nickel ferrite thin films using organometallic precursor combination. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2014, 3, P345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ganesan, P.; Sivanantham, A.; Shanmugam, S. Inexpensive electrochemical synthesis of nickel iron sulphides on nickel foam: Super active and ultra-durable electrocatalysts for alkaline electrolyte membrane water electrolysis. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 16394–16402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rameshan, C.; Ng, M.L.; Shavorskiy, A.; Newberg, J.T.; Bluhm, H. Water adsorption on polycrystalline vanadium from ultra-high vacuum to ambient relative humidity. Surf. Sci. 2015, 641, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Joshi, N.; da Silva, L.F.; Shimizu, F.M.; Mastelaro, V.R.; M’Peko, J.-C.; Lin, L.; Oliveira, O.N. UV-assisted chemiresistors made with gold-modified ZnO nanorods to detect ozone gas at room temperature. Microchim. Acta 2019, 186, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hou, L.; Liang, Q.; Wang, F. Mechanisms that control the adsorption–desorption behavior of phosphate on magnetite nanoparticles: The role of particle size and surface chemistry characteristics. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 2378–2388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Vedharathinam, V.; Botte, G.G. Understanding the electro-catalytic oxidation mechanism of urea on nickel electrodes in alkaline medium. Electrochim. Acta. 2012, 81, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Guo, L.; Zhang, J.; Ding, M.; Gu, C.; Vafakhah, S.; Zhang, W.; Li, D.; Valdivia y Alvarado, P.; Yang, H.Y. Hierarchical Co3O4/CNT decorated electrospun hollow nanofiber for efficient hybrid capacitive deionization. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 266, 118593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wu, P.; Cheng, S.; Yao, M.; Yang, L.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, P.; Xing, O.; Zhou, J.; Wang, M.; Luo, H.; et al. A Low-Cost, Self-Standing NiCo2O4@CNT/CNT Multilayer Electrode for Flexible Asymmetric Solid-State Supercapacitors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1702160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tourchi Moghadam, M.T.; Seifi, M.; Jamali, F.; Azizi, S.; Askari, M.B. ZnWO4-CNT as a superior electrode material for ultra-high capacitance supercapacitor. Surf. Interfaces 2022, 32, 102134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cao, D.; Ren, M.; Xiong, J.; Pan, L.; Wang, Y.; Ji, X.; Qiu, T.; Yang, J.; Zhang, C. Self-assembly of hierarchical Ti3C2Tx-CNT/SiNPs resilient films for high performance lithium ion battery electrodes. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 348, 136211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yan, L.; Niu, L.; Shen, C.; Zhang, Z.; Lin, J.; Shen, F.; Gong, Y.; Li, C.; Liu, X.; Xu, S. Modulating the electronic structure and pseudocapacitance of δ-MnO2 through transitional metal M (M = Fe, Co and Ni) doping. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 306, 529–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wei, Z.; Yuan, J.; Tang, S.; Wu, D.; Wu, L. Porous nanorods of nickel–cobalt double hydroxide prepared by electrochemical co-deposition for high-performance supercapacitors. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 542, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, F.; Sun, S.; Xu, Y.; Wang, T.; Yu, R.; Li, H. High performance asymmetric supercapacitor based on Cobalt Nickle Iron-layered double hydroxide/carbon nanofibres and activated carbon. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wu, P.; Cheng, S.; Yang, L.; Lin, Z.; Gui, X.; Ou, X.; Zhou, J.; Yao, M.; Wang, M.; Zhu, Y.; et al. Synthesis and Characterization of Self-Standing and Highly Flexible δ-MnO2@CNTs/CNTs Composite Films for Direct Use of Supercapacitor Electrodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 23721–23728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Li, J.; Hu, B.; Nie, P.; Shang, X.; Jiang, W.; Xu, K.; Yang, J.; Liu, J. Fe-regulated δ-MnO2 nanosheet assembly on carbon nanofiber under acidic condition for high performance supercapacitor and capacitive deionization. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 542, 148715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wang, Y.; Shen, C.; Niu, L.; Li, R.; Guo, H.; Shi, Y.; Li, C.; Liu, X.; Gong, Y. Hydrothermal synthesis of CuCo2O4/CuO nanowire arrays and RGO/Fe2O3 composites for high-performance aqueous asymmetric supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 9977–9985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g001aNanomaterials 13 02643 g001b
Figure 1. (a) XRD of NiFe2O4; XPS of NiFe2O4 (b) survey spectrum, spectra of (c) Ni2p, (d) Fe2p, (e) O1s, and (f) C1s. Black circle is the raw data (without modification), black frame is total peak without deconvolution.
Figure 1. (a) XRD of NiFe2O4; XPS of NiFe2O4 (b) survey spectrum, spectra of (c) Ni2p, (d) Fe2p, (e) O1s, and (f) C1s. Black circle is the raw data (without modification), black frame is total peak without deconvolution.
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g001aNanomaterials 13 02643 g001b
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g002
Figure 2. SEM of NiFe2O4@CNT with (a) before and (b) after stability test. (c) TEM of NiFe2O4@CNT, (d) TEM of pristine NiFe2O4, (e) diffraction pattern of NiFe2O4@CNT sample, and (f) EDAX and elemental analysis of NiFe2O4@CNT sample.
Figure 2. SEM of NiFe2O4@CNT with (a) before and (b) after stability test. (c) TEM of NiFe2O4@CNT, (d) TEM of pristine NiFe2O4, (e) diffraction pattern of NiFe2O4@CNT sample, and (f) EDAX and elemental analysis of NiFe2O4@CNT sample.
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g002
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g003
Figure 3. Comparison between (a) GC/NFO@CNT and (b) GC/NFO composites in different electrolyte concentrations.
Figure 3. Comparison between (a) GC/NFO@CNT and (b) GC/NFO composites in different electrolyte concentrations.
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g003
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g004
Figure 4. CVs of modified GC/NFO@CNT electrode at different concentrations of KOH.
Figure 4. CVs of modified GC/NFO@CNT electrode at different concentrations of KOH.
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g004
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g005
Figure 5. Representation of linear relations calculated for GC/NFO@CNT electrode. (a) Linear relation between the square root of scan rate and redox current. (b) Relation between the natural logarithm of both scan rate and oxidation current.
Figure 5. Representation of linear relations calculated for GC/NFO@CNT electrode. (a) Linear relation between the square root of scan rate and redox current. (b) Relation between the natural logarithm of both scan rate and oxidation current.
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g005
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g006
Figure 6. CVs of modified GC/NFO electrode at different concentrations of KOH.
Figure 6. CVs of modified GC/NFO electrode at different concentrations of KOH.
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g006
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g007
Figure 7. Representation of linear relations calculated for GC/NFO electrode. (a) Linear relation between the square root of scan rate and redox current. (b) Relation between the natural logarithm of both scan rate and oxidation current.
Figure 7. Representation of linear relations calculated for GC/NFO electrode. (a) Linear relation between the square root of scan rate and redox current. (b) Relation between the natural logarithm of both scan rate and oxidation current.
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g007
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g008
Figure 8. GCD of GC/NFO@CNT in a solution of (a) 0.1, (b) 0.5, (c) 1.0, and (d) 2.0 M KOH.
Figure 8. GCD of GC/NFO@CNT in a solution of (a) 0.1, (b) 0.5, (c) 1.0, and (d) 2.0 M KOH.
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g008
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g009
Figure 9. GCD of GC/NFO in a solution of (a) 0.1, (b) 0.5, (c) 1.0, and (d) 2.0 M KOH.
Figure 9. GCD of GC/NFO in a solution of (a) 0.1, (b) 0.5, (c) 1.0, and (d) 2.0 M KOH.
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g009
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g010
Figure 10. Relation between charging current and specific capacitance for (a) GC/NFO@CNT and (b) GC/NFO.
Figure 10. Relation between charging current and specific capacitance for (a) GC/NFO@CNT and (b) GC/NFO.
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g010
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g011
Figure 11. Study of different electrode durabilities for 2000 cycles (a) capacitance retention (%), and (b) columbic efficiency. Comparison between the 1st and the 2000th cycle of (c) GC/NFO@CNT and (d) GC/NFO electrodes.
Figure 11. Study of different electrode durabilities for 2000 cycles (a) capacitance retention (%), and (b) columbic efficiency. Comparison between the 1st and the 2000th cycle of (c) GC/NFO@CNT and (d) GC/NFO electrodes.
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g011
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g012
Figure 12. Ragone plot of GC/NFO and GC/NFO@CNT for different KOH conc. (0.1 to 2.0 M).
Figure 12. Ragone plot of GC/NFO and GC/NFO@CNT for different KOH conc. (0.1 to 2.0 M).
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g012
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g013
Figure 13. Nyquist plots of (a) GC/NFO@CNT and (b) GC/NFO electrodes at different electrolyte concentrations.
Figure 13. Nyquist plots of (a) GC/NFO@CNT and (b) GC/NFO electrodes at different electrolyte concentrations.
Nanomaterials 13 02643 g013
Table 2. EIS parameters of modified GC/NFO@CNT electrode at different electrolyte concentrations.
Table 2. EIS parameters of modified GC/NFO@CNT electrode at different electrolyte concentrations.
KOH
(M)		RsR1Q1W
R ( Ω cm2)R (Ω cm2)Y0 (Ω−1cm2s−n)nY0 (Ω−1cm2s−n)
0.16.4310.140.0006560.11810.11318
0.53.716.140.0126380.375490.16978
1.04.145.420.0290510.231670.29914
2.02.283.430.0196520.279250.54293
Table 3. EIS parameters of modified GC/NFO electrode at different electrolyte concentrations.
Table 3. EIS parameters of modified GC/NFO electrode at different electrolyte concentrations.
KOH
(M)		RsR1R2Q1Q2
R (Ω cm2)R (Ω cm2)R (Ω cm2)Y0 (Ω−1cm2s−n)nY0 (Ω−1cm2s−n)m
0.112.1117.1140.150.00131990.24820.00434510.75486
0.56.878.8719.210.00257090.317940.000893690.76123
1.01.962.9514.960.00265870.400070.000794110.73669
2.0 1.462.6512.790.0027470.632160.00098140.81583
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bashal, A.H.; Hefnawy, M.A.; Ahmed, H.A.; El-Atawy, M.A.; Pashameah, R.A.; Medany, S.S. Green Synthesis of NiFe2O4 Nano-Spinel Oxide-Decorated Carbon Nanotubes for Efficient Capacitive Performance—Effect of Electrolyte Concentration. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 2643. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13192643

AMA Style

Bashal AH, Hefnawy MA, Ahmed HA, El-Atawy MA, Pashameah RA, Medany SS. Green Synthesis of NiFe2O4 Nano-Spinel Oxide-Decorated Carbon Nanotubes for Efficient Capacitive Performance—Effect of Electrolyte Concentration. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(19):2643. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13192643

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bashal, Ali H., Mahmoud A. Hefnawy, Hoda A. Ahmed, Mohamed A. El-Atawy, Rami Adel Pashameah, and Shymaa S. Medany. 2023. "Green Synthesis of NiFe2O4 Nano-Spinel Oxide-Decorated Carbon Nanotubes for Efficient Capacitive Performance—Effect of Electrolyte Concentration" Nanomaterials 13, no. 19: 2643. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13192643

APA Style

Bashal, A. H., Hefnawy, M. A., Ahmed, H. A., El-Atawy, M. A., Pashameah, R. A., & Medany, S. S. (2023). Green Synthesis of NiFe2O4 Nano-Spinel Oxide-Decorated Carbon Nanotubes for Efficient Capacitive Performance—Effect of Electrolyte Concentration. Nanomaterials, 13(19), 2643. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13192643

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop