Next Article in Journal
Effect of Deposition and Protease Digestion on the Ex Vivo Activity of Antimicrobial Peptide-Coated Contact Lenses
Next Article in Special Issue
Integration of Gold Nanoparticles into Crosslinker-Free Polymer Particles and Their Colloidal Catalytic Property
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical and Experimental Study of Colored Magnetic Particle Mapping via Magnetoelectric Sensors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Water-Soluble Pd Nanoparticles for the Anti-Markovnikov Oxidation of Allyl Benzene in Water

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, California State University Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Blvd., Long Beach, CA 90840, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(2), 348; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020348
Submission received: 28 November 2022 / Revised: 6 January 2023 / Accepted: 11 January 2023 / Published: 14 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Semi-heterogeneous Metal Nanoparticles for Catalytic Applications)

Abstract

:
The catalytic activity and selectivity of two different water-soluble palladium nanoparticles capped with 5-(trimethylammonio)pentanethiolate and 6-(carboxylate)hexanethiolate ligands are investigated using the catalytic reaction of allyl benzene. The results show that the regioselective transformation of allyl benzene to 3-phenylpropanal occurs at room temperature and under atmospheric pressure in neat water via a Tsuji–Wacker type oxidation. Conventionally, the Tsuji–Wacker oxidation promotes the Markovnikov oxidation of terminal alkenes to their respective ketones in the presence of dioxygen. Water-soluble Pd nanoparticles, however, catalyze the anti-Markovnikov oxidation of allyl benzene to 3-phenylpropanal in up to 83% yields. Catalytic results of other aromatic alkenes suggest that the presence of benzylic hydrogen is a key to the formation of a p-allyl Pd intermediate and the anti-Markovnikov addition of H2O. The subsequent b-H elimination and tautomerization contribute to the formation of aldehyde products. Water-soluble Pd nanoparticles are characterized using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), UV–vis spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Catalysis results are examined using 1H NMR and/or GC-MS analyses of isolated reaction mixtures.

1. Introduction

The high surface area-to-volume ratio and the increased presence of active sites with low coordination numbers make metal nanoparticles excellent materials for chemical catalysis [1,2]. These characteristics consequently lead to a greater degree of reactivity since the substrate and the catalyst can interact to a larger extent. However, metal nanoparticles have a tendency to aggregate during and after catalytic reactions leading to deteriorations in activity and/or recyclability. The use of a support such as silica, metal oxide, and carbonic materials to bind the metal nanoparticles (Au, Pd, Pt, etc.) physically or chemically has been a popular strategy to alleviate the stability issues associated with metal nanoparticles [3,4,5]. Although these support systems have often proven to be more effective for stabilizing metal nanoparticles than their counterpart, organic ligand stabilization, they have comparably exhibited diminished reactivity and selectivity [6]. On the contrary, ligand-stabilized colloidal nanoparticles, which are semiheterogeneous in nature, can benefit from the characteristics of both homogeneous and heterogeneous systems. Specifically, they can be dispersed in aqueous or organic solvents allowing for homogeneous reactivity while also retaining effective separability common to heterogeneous systems [7,8,9,10,11].
Ligand-capped metal nanoparticles have shown a profound dependence on their surface compositions for exhibiting their degree of reactivity and selectivity [7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. A key aspect for achieving the desired selectivity often involves the partial poisoning of the catalyst surface with the ligand of choice. Our previous studies have shown that by employing various alkanethiosulfate preligands the appropriate balance between reactivity and selectivity of Pd nanoparticles can be achieved for organic transformations [14,15,16,17]. The slower passivation kinetics of ionic head groups in this alternate ligand have allowed for the control of surface ligand density for Pd nanoparticles. The ligand structure, conformation, and surface density on the metal catalyst were also crucial in obtaining the desired activity/selectivity for different catalysis reactions [9,18,19]. These Pd nanoparticles synthesized using the thiosulfate protocol have been successfully employed in several organic reactions including, for example, the chemoselective hydrogenation of styrene derivatives, the stereoselective hydrogenation of allenes, the regioselective hydrogenation of dienes, and the regioselective isomerization of allylic alcohols [9,20,21].
The Tsuji–Wacker oxidation involves the selective conversion of terminal alkenes to methyl ketones following the Markovnikov addition of the oxidant about the more substituted carbon center (Scheme 1) [22,23,24]. Increasing the versatility of this reaction required, however, the addition of cosolvent such as dimethylformamide (DMF) to address the insolubility issue observed for larger olefinic substrates [25,26]. Though versatile in its catalytic utility, the recent focus of the chemical community for the Tsuji–Wacker type oxidation has been on the selective generation of aldehydes via the anti-Markovnikov oxidation [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. This is partly due to the functional handle that aldehydes provide for further synthetic modification [36,37]. The regioselective oxidation of terminal olefins via the anti-Markovnikov addition of water about the less substituted carbon center is of substantial importance to the catalysis community since it provides an appealing alternative to conventional methods such as hydroformylation and hydroboration/oxidation [38,39].
Transition metal catalysts have proven to be rather effective for the anti-Markovnikov Tsuji–Wacker oxidation of terminal alkenes. The regioselectivity for the addition of the oxidant is contingent upon several factors including the choice of solvents, absence of reoxidant, strategic functional group presence, bound ligand, and more [28,29,30]. For example, the presence of directing groups such as alcohols, amines, phosphonates, and siloxy groups is postulated to allow for chelation to the metal center, which promotes the anti-Markovnikov addition about the less hindered carbon [29,30,31,32,33]. The absence of a reoxidant, which has served to complete the catalytic process by oxidizing Pd0 back to PdII has also allowed for the selective production of the aldehyde in a 9.8:1 ratio [30]. Recently, Grubbs and coworkers have demonstrated the nitrite-modified Tsuji–Wacker oxidation which uses AgNO3 as a co-catalyst. This has resulted in the formation of aldehydes up to 70% with 90% selectivity [31,32]. Despite these results, it is important to note that these reactions require the use of expensive cocatalysts (AgNO3), reagents (t-BuOH, MeNO2, etc.), unsafe/problematic solvents (DMF), and/or stoichiometric amounts of catalysts/oxidant to proceed successfully [28,29,30,31,32]. The conditions for this reaction have generally proven to be unappealing for industries and chemists alike.
Herein, we highlight an alternative approach that encompasses the use of water-soluble Pd nanoparticles (PdNPs) for the anti-Markovnikov oxidation of terminal alkenes under mild and greener conditions. In addition to the previously reported carboxylate-terminated Pd nanoparticles [40,41,42], ammonium-functionalized ligand-capped Pd nanoparticles that are soluble in water are applied as catalysts for biphasic oxidation of allyl benzene to 3-phenylpropanal (Scheme 2). Notably, no cosolvents or additional reagents besides H2 (g) were needed in this process for successful conversion.

2. Materials and Methods

The following reagents were purchased from the indicated suppliers and used as received. Tetra-n-octylammonium bromide (TOAB), sodium borohydride (NaBH4), and potassium tetrachloropalladate (II) (K2PdCl4) were obtained from Acros. 6-Bromohexanoic acid (C6H11O2Br), (5-bromopentyl)trimethylammonium bromide, allyl benzene, styrene, 4-phenylbut-1-ene, and sodium thiosulfate pentahydrate were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Ethanol, methanol, acetone, dichloromethane, chloroform, acetonitrile, and toluene were obtained from Fisher Scientific. Deuterium oxide (D2O) and chloroform-d (CDCl3) were purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc. Water was purified using a Millipore Sigma Simplicity Ultrapure Water System.
Synthesis of S-6-(carboxylate)hexyl thiosulfate. The synthesis of sodium ω-carboxylate-S-hexyl thiosulfate was achieved following a previously published method [40,41,42]. In a 500 mL round bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar and a condenser, 25 mmol of 6-bromohexanoic acid and 25 mmol of sodium thiosulfate pentahydrate were mixed in 100 mL of solvent (50:50 ethanol and water). The flask containing the mixture was then refluxed while stirring for 3 h. After reflux, the solution was allowed to cool to room temperature after which the solvents were removed via rotary evaporation. The crude product was dissolved in hot ethanol, cooled to 0 °C, and allowed to recrystallize overnight. The final product was filtered and then washed repeatedly with cold ethanol. The white crystalline solid was collected in a vial and stored under a vacuum for future use. The 1H NMR result of ω-carboxylate-S-hexyl thiosulfate sodium salt ligand is shown in Figure S1.
Synthesis of S-(5-trimethylammonio)pentyl thiosulfate. In a 50 mL round bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar and a condenser, 8.65 mmol of N-(5-bromopentyl)trimethylammonium bromide and 9.08 mmol of sodium thiosulfate pentahydrate were mixed in 10 mL of water. The reaction mixture was heated and maintained between 70 °C and 80 °C in an oil bath for 6 h while stirring. Once complete, the solution was allowed to cool overnight, and the product was precipitated while stirring gently. The final product was further cooled to 0 °C, filtered, and then washed repeatedly with cold H2O. The white crystalline solid was collected in a vial and stored under a vacuum for future use. The 1H NMR result of S-(5-trimethylammonio)pentyl thiosulfate sodium salt ligand is shown in Figure S2.
Synthesis of 6-(carboxylate)hexanethiolate- and 5-(trimethylammonio)pentanethiolate-capped Pd nanoparticles. K2PdCl4 (0.40 mmol) was dissolved in 12 mL of nanopure water and TOAB (2.0 mmol) was dissolved in 25 mL of toluene. Both solutions were mixed and continuously stirred until the organic layer turned dark orange and the aqueous layer became clear, indicating the completion of the phase transfer of PdCl42−. The aqueous layer was discarded using a separatory funnel, and the organic layer was placed in a 500 mL round-bottom flask. S-(5-Trimethylammonio)pentyl thiosulfate sodium salt (0.80 mmol) dissolved in 10 mL of 25% methanol was added to the organic layer; additional TOAB (2.0 mmol) was then added to the reaction flask. The reaction mixture was continuously stirred for 15 min. Afterward, NaBH4 (8.0 mmol) in 7 mL of nanopure water was vortexed for ~15 s and delivered to the reaction flask dropwise over the span of 60 s. Consequently, the solution darkened immediately, indicating the formation of nanoparticles. While stirring for 3 h, the PdNPs were transferred into the aqueous layer. The organic layer was then discarded using a separatory funnel, and the solvent was removed via rotary evaporation. The resulting crude nanoparticles were partially suspended in 25 mL acetonitrile/H2O (90:10) (methanol for 6-(carboxylate)hexanethiolate-capped PdNPs) and centrifuged at 4900 RPM. The precipitated nanoparticles were then washed twice with acetonitrile (methanol and ethanol for 6-(carboxylate)hexanethiolate-capped PdNPs). The washing procedure included sonicating the nanoparticles in the respective solvent and centrifuging at 4900 RPM. The resulting nanoparticles were dissolved in water and dialyzed overnight (~14 h). After dialysis, the water was removed via rotary evaporation and the resulting nanoparticles were dried in a vacuum overnight at a pressure of 25 psi.
Characterization of palladium nanoparticles and ligand precursors. The 1H NMR spectra were taken using a 400 MHz spectrometer (Bruker Fourier, Billerica, MA, USA). NMR data were analyzed via MestreNova software. D2O was used as the solvent of choice for both ligands and nanoparticles. The UV–vis spectra of the synthesized PdNPs were obtained using a Shimadzu UV-2450 spectrometer with nanopure water serving as the solvent. Data were analyzed via UV probe software. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed using TA Instruments SDT Q600. Approximately 5 mg of PdNP sample were placed in an aluminum pan and loaded into the instrument. Analysis was conducted under the following parameters: temperature ramp rate of furnace set at 20 °C/min and max temperature set to 600 °C. Data were analyzed via Trios software. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained by using a 1200 EX II electron microscope (JEOL USA, Peabody, MA, USA). The preparation of the TEM sample was achieved by diluting PdNPs to 0.002 mg/mL in methanol solvent. The samples were then deposited onto a 400-mesh standard carbon-coated copper grid and allowed to dry in the air for approximately 30 min. The images for the particle size distribution were analyzed via Scion Image Beta Release 2.
Catalytic assays. Catalysis experiments were performed by adding 10 mol% PdNP catalysts (0.025 mmol based on Pd) dissolved in 2 mL nanopure water into a 100 mL glass round-bottom flask equipped with a rubber stopper and a magnetic stirring bar. The reaction mixture was purged with hydrogen gas for 10 min. After the influx of H2 gas, the substrate (0.25 mmol) was injected into the sealed reaction flask. The reaction was continuously stirred at room temperature for 24 h. Reaction products were extracted twice by adding 1 mL of CH2Cl2. Purification of organic products from PdNP residues and water was done by filtration through a Pasteur pipette silica gel column chromatography using CH2Cl2 as eluent. The isolated products were analyzed via 1H NMR and/or GC/MS.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis of Water-Soluble Palladium Nanoparticles

Quaternary ammonium- and carboxylate-functionalized Pd nanoparticles were successfully synthesized via the two-phase thiosulfate synthesis, a modified Brust–Schiffrin method [40]. The previous report confirmed that the biphasic synthetic condition prevents the hydrolysis of the sulfite moiety, and the thiosulfate preligands decrease the rate of surface passivation allowing the formation of nanoparticles with higher catalytic activities [9]. A scheme outlining this thiosulfate process is depicted below (Scheme 3).
Briefly, the synthesis of these nanoparticles began with the phase transfer of the Pd2+ salt to the organic layer. This involved the use of a phase transfer reagent, tetraoctylammonium bromide (TOAB). After the phase transfer, the ligand precursor was added to the solution and transferred to the organic layer via additional TOAB. The Pd2+ salt was then effectively reduced to Pd0 via the addition of sodium borohydride (NaBH4). The reduction of palladium in the presence of capping ligands allowed for the formation of appropriately sized nanoparticles via nucleation, growth, and passivation of PdNPs.

3.2. Characterization of Palladium Nanoparticles and Ligand Precursors

The 1H NMR spectrum for the nanoparticles synthesized with the sodium ω-carboxylate-S-hexyl thiosulfate ligand precursor is shown in Figure S3, which agrees with the previously published results [40]. The 1H NMR spectrum for the newly synthesized PdNPs prepared from S-(5-trimethylammonio)pentyl thiosulfate ligand precursor is shown in Figure S4. The absence of methylene proton signals (α and β CH2 signals to the S) indicates the successful covalent binding of the thiolate group to the metal surface. This is also confirmed by the substantial broadening of visible peaks.
To further confirm the successful formation of nanoparticles, the UV–vis spectra of both 5-(trimethylammonio)pentanethiolate-capped PdNPs (C5-PdNP) and 6-(carboxylate)hexanethiolate-capped PdNPs (C6-PdNP) were obtained and are shown in Figure S5. Notably, the absorbance peaks for the Pd2+ salt are absent in both spectra. This indicates the complete reduction of Pd2+ to Pd0 in the presence of NaBH4. The exponential decay observed in the spectra corresponds to the Mie-scattering for spherical nanoparticles. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was used to determine the ratio between the organic ligand and the metal nanoparticle surface. As depicted in Figure S6, the nanoparticle consists of approximately 60% palladium and 29% ligand in addition to 11% solvent (calibrated TGA results: 68% palladium and 32% ligand). In comparison, C6-PdNPs (carboxylate) have been shown by TGA analysis (Figure S7) to consist of approximately 75% Pd and 25% ligand [40].
TEM images were taken for the newly synthesized C5-PdNPs as shown in Figure 1. Results indicate C5-PdNPs have an average core size of 3.20 ± 0.80 nm. Comparatively, the size of these nanoparticles is slightly larger than that of the C6-PdNPs, which had an average core size of 1.7 ± 0.9 nm (Figure S8) [40]. TEM images showed that both nanoparticles are spherical and well dispersed.

3.3. Catalytic Reactions of Allyl Benzene

The catalytic activity of two distinct nanoparticles with different ligand functionalities was tested for the reaction of allyl benzene. The reactions were performed with a 10 mol% (mole of Pd/mole over mole of allyl benzene × 100) PdNP catalyst dissolved in H2O at room temperature in the presence of 1 atm H2 (g). The 1H NMR spectra showed the chemical shifts for both aldehyde and allyl alcohol products indicating the oxidation of the terminal alkene group (see Supplementary Materials, Figure S9–S12). Table 1 shows the catalysis results obtained from the reactions of allyl benzene based on the GC-MS spectra of the resulting products.
After the reaction of allyl benzene with C6-PdNP, the analyses of reaction products using GC/MS at 6 and 24 h indicated that the hydrogenation or isomerization of allyl benzene was not the major reaction route for this reaction. Instead, the biphasic catalytic reaction under atmospheric H2 gas at room temperature resulted in the formation of 3-phenylpropanal (29% after 6 h and 66% after 24 h) as a major product with 3-phenyl-2-propen-1-ol (5% after 6 h and 6% after 24 h) as one of the minor products. The unusual oxidation of allyl benzene under these conditions confirmed the addition of H2O during the reaction. The absence of products such as 1-phenyl-2-propanone and 1-phenyl-2-propanol suggested that the addition reaction is regioselective promoting the anti-Markovnikov addition of H2O to the C=C bond of allyl benzene. The presence of 1-phenylprop-1-ene and propyl benzene indicated the minor occurrence of hydrogenation and/or isomerization of allyl benzene. In addition, other oxidation products including cinnamaldehyde, cinnamic acid, and benzaldehyde were observed for the 24 h reaction. The combined yields for oxidation–hydration products and isomerization–hydrogenation products were 89% and 4%, respectively.
When the concentration of H2 gas was diluted by using the 50:50 mixture of H2 and N2 gases, the selectivity for 3-phenylpropanal decreased significantly to 39%. The goal for this reaction condition was to increase the aldehyde selectivity by limiting the concentration of hydrogen, thus leading to a decrease in the formation of hydrogenation products. However, the reaction with diluted H2 gas increased the yields for overoxidation products (41%), cinnamaldehyde, cinnamic acid, and benzaldehyde, in addition to that for isomerization product, 1-phenylprop-1-ene. We also attempted to further investigate the effects of hydrogens gas by performing our reactions under aerobic conditions, which resulted in an overall impeded reaction.
A possible route for the formation of cinnamaldehyde is via the oxidation of cinnamyl alcohol (route A) as depicted in Scheme 4. The generation of cinnamaldehyde is thought to be facilitated by the anionic functionality of carboxylate ligands that are present in C6-PdNPs, which may assist in the oxidation to the carbonyl analog via E2-like elimination of H. Additionally, the formation of cinnamic acid (route B) takes place by the addition of H2O to the carbonyl group followed by the elimination of 2 hydrogens. Small amounts of benzaldehyde would form by the hydrolysis of cinnamaldehyde in a retro-aldol-type reaction [43].
The addition of DMF as a co-solvent was detrimental to the selectivity of C6-PdNP for oxidation products, 3-phenylpropanal (12%), 3-phenyl-2-propen-1-ol (16%), and over-oxidation products (18%). Instead, the reaction in H2O-DMF increased the formation of isomerization-hydrogenation products, 1-phenylprop-1-ene (34%) and propyl benzene (4%).
For the inhibition of overoxidation reactions and to increase the selectivity toward 3-phenylpropanal, we investigated the catalytic activity of C5-PdNP with cationic functionality that is less susceptible to the elimination of a-hydrogen from cinnamyl alcohol. The results showed that C5-PdNP was also appreciably selective for the anti-Markovnikov Tsuji–Wacker oxidation of allyl benzene achieving an average aldehyde yield of 83% without the formation of 3-phenyl-2-propen-1-ol. Cinnamaldehyde and cinnamic acid, which are other major overoxidation products, were also absent. The isomerization and hydrogenation products, 1-phenylprop-1-ene (7%) and propyl benzene (5%), respectively, are identified as the main side products of this reaction.
As an effort to minimize the degree of hydrogenation for the C5-PdNP, the catalytic reaction was again attempted in a 50:50 mixture of H2/N2 gas. As expected, this condition led to a slight decrease in the formation of propyl benzene (2%). However, a slight decrease in the amount of 3-phenylpropanal (71%) was observed due to the formation of 1-phenylpropan-1-one (4%) and the increase in benzaldehyde (7%). Overall oxidation yields in a 50:50 mixture of H2/N2 gas, however, were nearly unchanged (85% in H2 gas vs. 83% in H2/N2 gas). The formation of a minute amount of 1-phenylpropan-1-one, which was absent entirely for the catalysis with C6-PdNP, hinted at the occurrence of a Pd-allyl intermediate and the nucleophilic attack by H2O at the benzylic site of allyl benzene (Markovnikov addition). The addition of DMF was again damaging to the selectivity of C5-PdNP for 3-phenylpropanal (14%) formation. The yields for isomerization–hydrogenation products, 1-phenylprop-1-ene (26%) and propyl benzene (5%), were significantly increased for the reaction in H2O-DMF.
Overall, C5-PdNP has proven to be quite effective for the anti-Markovnikov oxidation of allyl benzene producing 3-phenylpropanal in 83% yield in water at room temperature. C5-PdNP has also resisted the formation of additional oxidation products such as cinnamyl alcohol, cinnamaldehyde, and cinnamic acid observed for the C6-PdNP. It is recognized that oxidation of allyl benzene in the presence of H2 (g) is quite an unusual case since the Tsuji–Wacker oxidation is normally performed under aerobic conditions to afford methyl ketones.
The substrate scope of two nanoparticle catalysts, C5- and C6-PdNPs, was further examined using styrene and 4-phenylbut-1-ene. By using these substrates, we sought to maintain the interaction between the aromatic groups and the metal catalyst by using different aromatic olefinic compounds [44,45]. To our surprise, however, little to no oxidation was observed using either set of PdNPs under the same reaction condition as depicted below (Scheme 5).
Instead of oxidation, the isomerization/hydrogenation (85%:14%) products were prevalent for 4-phenylbut-1-ene whereas only a minute amount of hydrogenation was observed for styrene. Although these preliminary studies narrowed the substrate scope for this reaction, some useful insight was obtained with regard to the importance of allylic hydrogens, which are speculated to play an important role in the oxidation-hydration processes. As we may note, styrene does not have any allylic hydrogens present and are also not capable of undergoing isomerization. On the other hand, both allyl benzene and 4-phenylbut-1-ene have allylic hydrogens and may undergo isomerization in the presence of H2 (g). However, this does not explain why no oxidation was observed for 4-phenylbut-1-ene since it meets the above criteria. A plausible explanation could be that the allylic hydrogens relative to the alkene are too far away from the benzene ring to experience additional benzylic effects and/or form a stable arene/Pd transition state. Altogether, these results point toward the potential C-H activation of allyl benzene, which may be dependent on the concentration of hydrogen.
Based on these studies, the proposed mechanism begins with the coordination of the double bond to form an η2 Pd-alkene intermediate (Scheme 6) [46]. The anti-Markovnikov addition of H2O about the less hindered carbon atom can occur via one of two intermediates, branched Pd-alkyl intermediate or Pd-allyl intermediate [47,48,49]. Under our conditions, we would normally expect to form a branched Pd-alkyl intermediate due to the excess of H2 (g) [16]. However, this intermediate is geared toward forming the hydrogenation and isomerization products after the addition of hydrogen about either carbon center. Assuming the simultaneous addition of H2O and the formation of a branched Pd-alkyl intermediate, the role of hydrogen gas would become more obscure. On the contrary, if we assume that our substrate undergoes oxidative addition to our palladium center then we can reasonably account for the crucial presence of hydrogen. This alternative pathway would lead to the formation of an η3 Pd-allyl intermediate after the cleavage of hydrogen α to a benzene ring.
Following this step, the addition of the H2O to the less substituted carbon atom of the Pd-allyl intermediate would form cinnamyl alcohol. This then leads to the formation of a common branched Pd-alkyl intermediate, which can underdo β-hydride elimination at two different carbon centers. The abstraction of hydrogen α to the phenyl group would lead to the production of 3-phenyl-2-propen-1-ol (cinnamyl alcohol), which has often been observed as one of the major products for the C6-PdNPs. The removal of hydrogen α to the hydroxyl group results in an enol intermediate that can favorably tautomerize to form 3-phenylpropanal, which is a significant or major product for both PdNPs. Interestingly, the isomerization of cinnamyl alcohol to 3-phenylpropanal could be enhanced if the concentration of hydrogen is increased. Thus, the Pd-allyl pathway may account for the necessary presence of hydrogen gas to achieve significant aldehyde yields. Whatever the nucleophilic mode of addition may be, it is recognized that a common branched Pd-alkyl intermediate must be generated to produce 3-phenylpropanal and 3-phenyl-2-propen-1-ol.

4. Conclusions

Synthesis of water-soluble Pd nanoparticles was successfully achieved using the modified thiosulfate protocol. These PdNPs demonstrated excellent regioselectivity for the anti-Markovnikov Tsuji–Wacker oxidation of allyl benzene, via the addition of water about the less hindered carbon atom, under mild conditions using only H2 (g) as a secondary reagent. No other reagents such as base, salts, and organic cosolvent were added. C5-PdNPs demonstrated higher aldehyde selectivity than the C6-PdNPs (~83% vs. ~66%, respectively). C5-PdNPs were slightly more prone to hydrogenation/isomerization reactions but suppressed additional oxidation reactions. This was contrary to the results for the C6-PdNPs, which produced a significant amount of additional oxidation products. Mechanistically, the nucleophilic addition of H2O took place at the Pd-allyl intermediate with the necessary presence of benzylic hydrogens. The addition of water to the less substituted carbon is a technologically important process because this reaction can be used to form primary alcohols and related derivatives. Since the regioselective addition of H2O by water-soluble PdNPs is operated under mild conditions without any additional reagent, this discovery might turn out to be useful for the practical applications of colloidal nanoparticle catalysts with further optimization expanding the scope of substrates.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano13020348/s1, Figure S1. 1H NMR spectrum of sodium ω-carboxylate-S-hexyl thiosulfate ligand; Figure S2. 1H NMR spectrum of sodium S-(5-trimethylammonio)pentyl thiosulfate ligand; Figure S3. 1H NMR spectrum of 6-(carboxylate)-1-hexanethiolate-capped PdNP; Figure S4. 1H NMR spectrum of 5-(trimethylammonio)pentanethiolate-capped PdNP; Figure S5. UV-Vis spectra of (a) C5-PdNP (ammonium) and (b) C6-PdNP (carboxylate); Figure S6. Thermogravimetric analysis of C5-PdNP; Figure S7. Thermogravimetric analysis of C6-PdNP; Figure S8. TEM images and size distribution histograms for C6-PdNP; Figure S9: 1H NMR spectrum obtained after reaction of allyl benzene with C6 PdNP in water for 6 h (extracted with CDCl3); Figure S10: Gas chromatogram obtained after the reaction of allyl benzene with C5 PdNP in water for 24 h (extracted with CH2Cl2 and then passed through a pipette filled with silica gel); Figure S11: Mass spectra obtained after the reaction of allyl benzene with C5 PdNP in water for 24 h (extracted with CH2Cl2 and then passed through a pipette filled with silica gel); Figure S12: Gas chromatogram and mass spectra obtained after reaction of allyl benzene with C6 PdNP in water for 24 h (extracted with CH2Cl2 and then passed through a pipette filled with silica gel).

Author Contributions

E.A. and C.N. conducted the experimental work. E.A. wrote the original draft with C.N. adding his contributions. Y.-S.S. supervised the project, provided resources, and edited the draft. The manuscript was written through the contributions of all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a grant from the Division of Chemistry at the National Science Foundation (CHE-1954659).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank the National Science Foundation (CHE-1954659) and CSULB for the financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, L.; Corma, A. Metal Catalysts for Heterogeneous Catalysts: From Single Atoms to Nanoclusters and Nanoparticles. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 4981–5079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Li, Z.; Ji, S.; Liu, Y.; Cao, X.; Tian, S.; Chen, Y.; Niu, Z.; Li, Y. Well-Defined Materials for Heterogeneous Catalysis: From Nanoparticles to Isolated Single-Atom Sites. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 623–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xu, Y.; Ma, J.; Xu, Y.; Xu, L.; Xu, L.; Li, H.; Li, H. Palladium nanoparticles encapsulated in porous silica shells: An efficient and highly stable catalyst for CO oxidation. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 851–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Farrussenga, D.; Tuel, A. Perspectives on zeolite-encapsulated metal nanoparticles and their applications in catalysis. New J. Chem. 2016, 40, 3933–3949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Be’jar, M.; Peters, K.; Tapley, G.; Grenier, M.; Scaiano, J. Rapid one-pot propargylamine synthesis by plasmon mediated catalysis with gold nanoparticles on ZnO under ambient conditions. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 1732. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ali, E.; Rahman, M.; Sarkar, S.M.; Hamid, S.B.A. Heterogeneous Metal Catalysts for Oxidation Reactions. J. Nanomater. 2014, 1, 192038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Rossi, L.M.; Fiorio, J.L.; Garcia, M.A.; Ferraz, C.P. The Role and Fate of Capping Ligands in Colloidally Prepared Metal Nanoparticle Catalysts. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 5889–5915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lu, L.; Zou, S.; Fang, B. The Critical Impacts of Ligands on Heterogeneous Nanocatalysis: A Review. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 6020–6058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. San, K.A.; Shon, Y.-S. Synthesis of Alkanethiolate-Capped Metal Nanoparticles Using Alkyl Thiosulfate Ligand Precursors: A Method to Generate Promising Reagents for Selective Catalysis. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Du, Y.; Sheng, H.; Astruc, D.; Zhu, M. Atomically Precise Noble Metal Nanoclusters as Efficient Catalysts: A Bridge between Structure and Properties. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 526–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zhong, R.-Y.; Sun, K.-Q.; Hong, Y.-C.; Xu, B.-Q. Impacts of Organic Stabilizers on Catalysis of Au Nanoparticles from Colloidal Preparation. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 3982–3993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Eyimegwu, P.; Lartey, J.; Kim, J. Gold-Nanoparticle-Embedded Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) Microparticles for Selective Quasi-Homogeneous Catalytic Homocoupling Reactions. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2, 6057–6066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Moreno, M.; Kissell, L.; Jasinski, J.; Zamborini, F. Selectivity and Reactivity of Alkylamine- and Alkanethiolate-Stabilized Pd and PdAg Nanoparticles for Hydrogenation and Isomerization of Allyl Alcohol. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 2602–2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Vargas, K.M.; San, K.A.; Shon, Y.-S. Isolated Effects of Surface Ligand Density on the Catalytic Activity and Selectivity of Palladium Nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2, 7188–7196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sadeghmoghaddam, E.; Gu, H.; Shon, Y.-S. Pd Nanoparticle-Catalyzed Isomerization vs. Hydrogenation of Allyl Alcohol: Solvent-Dependent Regioselectivity. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 1838–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Zhu, J.S.; Shon, Y.-S. Mechanistic Interpretation of Selective Catalytic Hydrogenation and Isomerization of Alkenes and Dienes by Ligand Deactivated Pd Nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 17786–17790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. San, K.A.; Chen, V.; Shon, Y.-S. Preparation of Partially Poisoned Alkanethiolate-Capped Platinumnanoparticles for Selective Hydrogenation of Activated Terminal Alkynes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017, 9, 9823–9832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tieu, P.; Nguyen, V.; Shon, Y.-S. Proximity Effects of Methyl Group on Ligand Steric Interactions and Colloidal Stability of Palladium Nanoparticles. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Maung, M.S.; Shon, Y.-S. Effects of Noncovalent Interactions on the Catalytic Activity of Unsupported Colloidal Palladium Nanoparticles Stabilized with Thiolate Ligands. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 20882–20891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mahdaly, M.A.; Zhu, J.S.; Nguyen, V.; Shon, Y.-S. Colloidal Palladium Nanoparticles for Selective Hydrogenation of Styrene Derivatives with Reactive Functional Groups. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 20819–20828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Chen, T.-A.; Shon, Y.-S. Alkanethiolate-Capped Palladium Nanoparticles for Regio- and Stereoselective Hydrogenation of Allenes. Catalysts 2018, 8, 428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jira, R. Acetaldehyde from Ethylene—A Retrospective on the Discovery of the Wacker Process. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9034–9037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. DeLuca, R.J.; Edwards, J.L.; Steffens, L.D.; Michel, B.W.; Qiao, X.; Zhu, C.; Cook, S.P.; Sigman, M.S. Wacker-Type Oxidation of Internal Alkenes using Pd(Quinox) and TBHP. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 1682–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Liu, B.; Hu, P.; Xu, F.; Cheng, L.; Tan, M.; Han, W. Nickel-catalyzed remote and proximal Wacker-type oxidation. Commun. Chem. 2019, 2, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Clement, W.; Selwitz, C. Improved Procedures for Converting Higher α-Olefins to Methyl Ketones with Palladium Chloride. J. Org. Chem. 1964, 29, 241–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Keith, J.; Henry, P. The Mechanism of the Wacker Reaction: A Tale of Two Hydroxypalladations. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9038–9049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dong, J.J.; Browne, W.R.; Feringa, B.L. Palladium-Catalyzed Anti-Markovnikov Oxidation of Terminal Alkenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 54, 734–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kim, K.; Li, J.; Grubbs, R.; Stoltz, B. Catalytic Anti-Markovnikov Transformations of Hindered Terminal Alkenes Enabled by Aldehyde-Selective Wacker-Type Oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 13179–13182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Weiner, B.; Baeza, A.; Jerphagnon, T.; Feringa, B. Aldehyde Selective Wacker Oxidations of Phthalimide Protected Allylic Amines: A New Catalytic Route to β3-Amino Acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 9473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wright, J.; Gaunt, M.; Spencer, J. Novel Anti-Markovnikov Regioselectivity in the Wacker Reaction of Styrenes. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Wickens, Z.; Morandi, B.; Grubbs, R. Aldehyde-Selective Wacker-Type Oxidation of Unbiased Alkenes Enabled by a Nitrite Co-Catalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 11257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wickens, Z.; Skakuj, K.; Morandi, B.; Grubbs, R. Catalyst-Controlled Wacker-Type Oxidation: Facile Access to Functionalized Aldehydes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Guo, J.; Teo, P. Anti-Markovnikov Oxidation and Hydration of Terminal Olefins. Dalton Trans. 2014, 43, 6952–6964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Zhang, G.; Hu, X.; Chiang, C.-W.; Yi, H.; Pei, P.; Singh, A.K.; Lei, A. Anti-Markovnikov Oxidation of b-Alkyl Styrenes with H2O at the Terminal Oxidant. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 12037–12040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nakaoka, S.; Murakami, Y.; Kataoka, Y.; Ura, Y. Maleimide-Assisted Anti-Markovnikov Wacker-type Oxidation of Vinylarenes Using Molecular Oxygen as a Terminal Oxidant. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Magano, J.; Dunetz, J. Large-Scale Carbonyl Reductions in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2012, 16, 1156–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kawajiri, T.; Ohta, R.; Fujioka, H.; Sajiki, H.; Sawama, Y. Aromatic aldehyde-selective aldol addition with aldehyde-derived silyl enol ethers. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 374–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Franke, R.; Selent, D.; Börne, A. Applied Hydroformylation. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 5675–5732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bhattacharjee, J.; Harinath, A.; Bano, K.; Panda, T.K. Highly Chemoselective Hydroboration of Alkynes and Nitriles Catalyzed by Group 4 Metal Amidophosphine-Borane Complexes. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 1595–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gavia, D.J.; Maung, M.S.; Shon, Y.-S. Water-Soluble Pd Nanoparticles Synthesized From ω-Carboxyl-S-alkanethiosulfae Ligand Precursors as Unimolecular Micelle Catalysts. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 12432–12440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Chen, V.; Pan, H.; Jacobs, R.; Derakhshan, S.; Shon, Y.-S. Influence of Graphene Oxide Supports on Solution-Phase Catalysis of Thiolate-Protected Palladium Nanoparticles in Water. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Maung, M.S.; Dinh, T.; Salazar, C.; Shon, Y.-S. Unsupported Colloidal Palladium Nanoparticles for Biphasic Hydrogenation and Isomerization of Hydrophobic Allylic Alcohols in Water. Colloids Surf. A 2017, 513, 367–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Zhang, S.-L.; Yu, Z.-L. C-C Activation by Retro-Aldol Reaction of Two b-Hydroxy Carbonyl Compounds: Synergy with Pd-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling To Access Mono-a-arylated Ketones and Esters. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 81, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Williams, R.M.; Medlin, J.W. Benzyl Alcohol Oxidation on Pd(111): Aromatic Binding Effects on Alcohol Reactivity. Langmuir 2014, 30, 4642–4653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Harrison, J.A.; Nielson, A.J.; Sajjad, M.A.; Schwerdtfeger, P. Evaluation of the Agostic and Syndetic Donations in Aromatic Ring Agostic Interactions Involved in Heteroatom Ligand-Directed C-H Bond Activation. Organometallics 2019, 38, 1903–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, L.; Zhou, M.; Wang, A.; Zhang, T. Selective Hydrogenation over Supported Metal Catalysts: From Nanoparticles to Single Atoms. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 683–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dong, Y.; Ebrahimi, M.; Tillekaratne, A.; Zaera, F. Direct Addition Mechanism during the Catalytic Hydrogenation of Olefins over Platinum Surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 2439–2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, H.; Qiu, S.; Wang, S.; Zhai, H. Pd-Catalyzed Umpolung of p-Allylpalladium Intermediates: Assembly of All-Carbon a-Vinyl Quaternary Aldehydes through C(sp3)-C(sp3) Coupling. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 11960–11965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fernandes, R.A.; Nallasivam, J.L. Catalytic Allylic Functionalization via p-Allyl Palladium Chemistry. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019, 17, 8647–8672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheme 1. Regioselectivity for the Tsuji–Wacker oxidation of terminal alkenes.
Scheme 1. Regioselectivity for the Tsuji–Wacker oxidation of terminal alkenes.
Nanomaterials 13 00348 sch001
Scheme 2. Reaction scheme and conditions for the anti-Markovnikov oxidation of allyl benzene.
Scheme 2. Reaction scheme and conditions for the anti-Markovnikov oxidation of allyl benzene.
Nanomaterials 13 00348 sch002
Scheme 3. Two-phase synthesis of 5-(trimethylammonio)pentanethiolate-capped Pd nanoparticles and 6-(carboxylate)hexanethiolate-capped Pd nanoparticles using the thiosulfate method.
Scheme 3. Two-phase synthesis of 5-(trimethylammonio)pentanethiolate-capped Pd nanoparticles and 6-(carboxylate)hexanethiolate-capped Pd nanoparticles using the thiosulfate method.
Nanomaterials 13 00348 sch003aNanomaterials 13 00348 sch003b
Figure 1. TEM Images of 5-(trimethylammonio)pentanethiolate-capped PdNP.
Figure 1. TEM Images of 5-(trimethylammonio)pentanethiolate-capped PdNP.
Nanomaterials 13 00348 g001
Scheme 4. Proposed paths leading to the formation of overoxidation products.
Scheme 4. Proposed paths leading to the formation of overoxidation products.
Nanomaterials 13 00348 sch004
Scheme 5. Catalysis results of other aromatic olefins: No anti-Markovnikov oxidation products are observed.
Scheme 5. Catalysis results of other aromatic olefins: No anti-Markovnikov oxidation products are observed.
Nanomaterials 13 00348 sch005
Scheme 6. Proposed mechanisms for the anti-Markovnikov Tsuji–Wacker oxidation of allyl benzene using water-soluble PdNPs.
Scheme 6. Proposed mechanisms for the anti-Markovnikov Tsuji–Wacker oxidation of allyl benzene using water-soluble PdNPs.
Nanomaterials 13 00348 sch006
Table 1. Catalysis results for the anti-Markovnikov oxidation of allyl benzene by water-soluble Pd nanoparticles (10 mol% Pd) in water at room temperature a.
Table 1. Catalysis results for the anti-Markovnikov oxidation of allyl benzene by water-soluble Pd nanoparticles (10 mol% Pd) in water at room temperature a.
Reaction ConditionConversion (%)Oxidation–Hydration (%)Isomerization (%)Hydrogenation (%)
Nanomaterials 13 00348 i001Nanomaterials 13 00348 i002Nanomaterials 13 00348 i003Nanomaterials 13 00348 i004
Nanomaterials 13 00348 i005 C6-PdNP6 h, 1 atm H2, H2O4029506
24 h, 1 atm H2, H2O93 b66631
24 h, 1 atm H2/N2, H2O91 c39092
24 h, 1 atm H2, H2O/DMF94 d1216344
Nanomaterials 13 00348 i006 C5-PdNP24 h, 1 atm H2, H2O97 e83075
24 h, 1 atm H2/N2, H2O93 f71092
24 h, 1 atm H2, H2O/DMF83 g1418265
a The results are the average values of multiple runs with standard deviations less than ±15% for all data. b Other products observed: cinnamaldehyde (14%), cinnamic acid (2%), and benzaldehyde (1%). c Other products observed: cinnamaldehyde (21%), cinnamic acid (10%), and benzaldehyde (10%). d Other products observed: cinnamaldehyde (9%), cinnamic acid (5%), benzaldehyde (4%), and unidentified (10%). e Other product observed: benzaldehyde (2%). f Other products observed: 1-phenylpropan-1-one (4%) and benzaldehyde (7%). g Other products observed: cinnamaldehyde (8%), cinnamic acid (6%), benzaldehyde (3%), and unidentified (3%).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Avila, E.; Nixarlidis, C.; Shon, Y.-S. Water-Soluble Pd Nanoparticles for the Anti-Markovnikov Oxidation of Allyl Benzene in Water. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 348. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020348

AMA Style

Avila E, Nixarlidis C, Shon Y-S. Water-Soluble Pd Nanoparticles for the Anti-Markovnikov Oxidation of Allyl Benzene in Water. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(2):348. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020348

Chicago/Turabian Style

Avila, Edwin, Christos Nixarlidis, and Young-Seok Shon. 2023. "Water-Soluble Pd Nanoparticles for the Anti-Markovnikov Oxidation of Allyl Benzene in Water" Nanomaterials 13, no. 2: 348. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020348

APA Style

Avila, E., Nixarlidis, C., & Shon, Y. -S. (2023). Water-Soluble Pd Nanoparticles for the Anti-Markovnikov Oxidation of Allyl Benzene in Water. Nanomaterials, 13(2), 348. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13020348

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop