Next Article in Journal
Boosting the Initial Coulomb Efficiency of Sisal Fiber-Derived Carbon Anode for Sodium Ion Batteries by Microstructure Controlling
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Enhancement of Exchange Bias in Innovative Core/Shell/Shell Structures: Synthesis and Magnetic Properties of Co-Oxide/Co and Co-Oxide/Co/Co-Oxide Inverted Nanostructures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Photogating Effect-Driven Photodetectors and Their Emerging Applications

Department of Electronic Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(5), 882; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13050882
Submission received: 19 January 2023 / Revised: 15 February 2023 / Accepted: 24 February 2023 / Published: 26 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optoelectronic Devices and Applications Based on Emerging Materials)

Abstract

:
Rather than generating a photocurrent through photo-excited carriers by the photoelectric effect, the photogating effect enables us to detect sub-bandgap rays. The photogating effect is caused by trapped photo-induced charges that modulate the potential energy of the semiconductor/dielectric interface, where these trapped charges contribute an additional electrical gating-field, resulting in a shift in the threshold voltage. This approach clearly separates the drain current in dark versus bright exposures. In this review, we discuss the photogating effect-driven photodetectors with respect to emerging optoelectrical materials, device structures, and mechanisms. Representative examples that reported the photogating effect-based sub-bandgap photodetection are revisited. Furthermore, emerging applications using these photogating effects are highlighted. The potential and challenging aspects of next-generation photodetector devices are presented with an emphasis on the photogating effect.

1. Introduction

As commonly used photodetectors, semiconductor-based photodetectors absorb photons originated by light irradiation and convert them into an electric current [1,2,3]. The ability of the photodetector is determined by how efficiently the device absorbs the target light and how sensitively and accurately it detects it [4]. One of the representative parameters for evaluating the performance of a photodetector is responsivity (R). Responsivity shows how sensitive the device is according to the intensity of the irradiated light. It can also be represented by an electric current converted from the light signal. Other photodetector parameters are described in Table 1 [5].
These electronic device-type photodetectors can be classified into photoconductors [6,7,8,9,10], photodiodes [11,12,13,14,15], and phototransistors [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24], depending on their structure and operation principles. While photoconductors and photodiodes generate photocurrents in a two-terminal structure, phototransistors are based on a thin-film transistor (TFT) structure with three terminals having an additional electrode: a gate electrode, in which the electric fields can be modulated by an applied gate voltage (VG) bias, forming channel conductance [25,26,27,28,29]. Based on this principle, phototransistors can detect light and amplify the detected light signal without external devices [30,31,32]. For this reason, phototransistors have attracted considerable attention and have been developed using various active materials as a charge transport layer, such as metal oxides [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40], polymers [41,42,43,44,45,46], small molecules [47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56], 2D materials [57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64], and carbon nanotubes [65,66,67,68].
The photoelectric effect is the general driving mechanism for operating phototransistors. Photo-excited carriers are generated when incident photons are absorbed in a material [69,70,71,72]. In this principle, the excited electrons and holes are dissociated from the valence band to the conduction band and vice versa with energy hν larger than the energy bandgap (Eg) between the bands [73]. Thus, only light exposure with an energy hν larger than Eg can motivate the photodetection operation in these photoelectric effect-based devices.
Another mechanism for phototransistors to detect sub-bandgap rays is called the photogating effect. The mechanism of the photogating effect is explained by the ability of light to change the electronic structure of a material. When a material is exposed to light, photons can interact with electrons in the material to generate excited electrons and holes. These excited electrons and holes can diffuse into the material and change its electrical properties. Rather than photocurrent generation through photo-excited carriers, the photogating effect results from photoinduced trapped charges [25,74,75]. For example, the photogating effect is often related to the presence of impurities, known as trap states, within the material. These trap states can trap excited electrons and holes generated by light and alter the potential energy of the semiconductor/dielectric interface. These changes in charge distribution can contribute an additional electric gating field, leading changes in charge transport behavior, which is the shift in the threshold voltage (VTh). These trapped charges clearly distinguish the drain current under dark and light exposure [76,77,78,79]. As the photogating effect is obtained by generation due to the energy states inside the energy bandgap, the photogating effect can be used to enhance the photoresponse, even for sub-bandgap wavelengths.
Recent studies about the photogating effect have been reviewed according to different channel materials, but most of them have been focused on low dimensional materials. This paper reports recent efforts in photogating effect-based photodetectors involving various active materials, including perovskite, organics, compounds, polymers, and oxides, as well as 2D materials. The structure, material, and mechanism ideas driving the photogating effect to enhance the photodetection performances are summarized and classified by charge transport materials. In addition, studies that implemented the photogating effect in neuromorphic devices and optoelectronic memory are introduced, highlighting the potential of the photogating effect to be utilized more actively in next-generation applications beyond von Neumann without material limitation.

2. Recent Advances Using the Photogating Effect

2.1. Graphene-Based Photodetectors

Graphene is used widely as an active channel material to induce photogating effects in photodetectors. In 2022, Gao et al. operated a graphene-based photogating effect detector at zero bias, reporting a responsivity (R) of 0.26 A·W−1 in visible light [80]. Adapting the asymmetric structure of a graphene channel using cadmium sulfide (CdS) film made this feasible (Figure 1a). Graphene covered with CdS nanocrystals acted as a p-doped channel. With light illumination, the photogenerated carriers were separated in the CdS nanocrystals. While the holes were trapped in the CdS, the electrons were injected into the graphene, and the Fermi level (EF) of the graphene increased, causing a photocurrent (IPh) to flow (Figure 1c). Interestingly, as the area of CdS-covering graphene increased, the IPh decreased (Figure 1b). In general, Si is used widely as a substrate. On the other hand, this has limited the detection wavelengths of optoelectronics from the visible to near-infrared (NIR) because of the cut-off wavelength of Si [81,82]. In 2018, Fukushima et al. produced graphene-based photodetectors that detect middle-wavelength infrared (MWIR, 3–5 μm) spectral bands used in industry, military, and aerospace by substituting a Si substrate with indium antimonide (InSb) as the active layer [83]. Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS)-SiO2 was adopted as a dielectric layer. Figure 1d shows that the source-drain current (ID) had the lowest value at approximately VG = 7.7 V under dark conditions. This voltage corresponds to the Dirac point of graphene, indicating the photogating effect by the InSb active layer. When MWIR light was irradiated, photogenerated electrons of InSb were trapped at the trap sites of the TEOS–SiO2/InSb interface, acting as additional negative VG and modulating the surface charge density of graphene. As a result, an ultrahigh R of 33.8 A·W−1 was achieved by irradiating with 4.6 μm MWIR light at 50 K. Kim et al. conducted another study on graphene-based optoelectronics in 2020. They reported a gradual and reversible transition between negative photoconductivity (NPC) and positive photoconductivity by a photogating effect in a single device [84]. NPC, whose photoconductivity is reduced by light, has low power consumption and a rapid frequency response. They implemented molybdenum ditelluride (MoTe2) and a graphene heterostructure as the active and channel layers, respectively (Figure 1e). Under 975 nm light irradiation, photo-excited hole carriers trapped in MoTe2 modulated the Fermi level of the MoTe2–graphene junction, lowering the graphene conductivity from the initial state to the NPC (Figure 1f). Interestingly, when the laser power was increased to more than 500 μW, the NPC was converted to positive photoconductivity due to changes in the graphene/MoTe2 Schottky junction with reverse-bending and hole carrier injection (Figure 1g,h). The transition from NPC to the positive photoconductivity and vice versa was indestructible.

2.2. TMD- and BP-Based Photodetectors

Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides (2D TMDs) have the advantages of a tunable bandgap, a layer number-dependent band structure, easy fabrication, ultrastability, a high on-current (IOn)/off-current (IOff) ratio, high electron mobility (μ), and high R [4,85,86,87]. On the other hand, their slow response requires charge-trapping layers, such as adsorbates and oxides [5,88,89,90]. Integrating an oxide layer in TMDs is not easy, but surface oxidation of atomically thin TMDs was one of the breakthroughs. In 2018, Yamamoto et al. treated a tungsten diselenide (WSe2) surface with O3 to form a self-limiting oxide layer, which is WOx [91]. It served as a photogating medium, providing electron trap sites and extending the carrier lifetime. As a result, the IPh showed persistent photoconductivity (PPC) behavior (Figure 2a). A high R of 3663 A·W−1 was obtained using white light with an intensity of 1.1 nW. Group-10 TMDs have excellent optical and electronic properties, which respond to light in a broadband wavelength range from visible to mid-infrared, and are appropriate for ultrathin and flexible photodetectors [92,93]. In 2021, Yang et al. produced Se vacancies as hole trap sites by tape exfoliation to overcome the low R (0.4–6.25 A·W−1) of PtSe2 [94]. The photogenerated holes trapped in the Se defects gated the platinum diselenide (PtSe2) channel (Figure 2b) and prolonged the electron lifetime, leading to a high R of 5 × 104 A·W−1. This value of the photodetector with few-layer PtSe2 flakes exhibited four orders of magnitude higher than that in previous studies. Furthermore, NPC and positive photoconductance were observed depending on the VG under light irradiation. As shown at point B in Figure 2c, a positive photocurrent was obtained by the electrons, the majority carrier. The opposite mechanism is applied at point A by holes. The photogating effect can also be utilized on a photodiode. The strong R and rapid response time in 2D van der Waals (vdW) heterostructures are incompatible because of their relatively weak optical absorption characteristic and weak photogenerated carrier dissociation force [95,96]. In 2019, Wang et al. addressed this problem by fabricating a CH3NH3PbI3 (MAPbI3)/black phosphorus (BP)/MoS2 photodiode (Figure 2d) [88]. The rapid response of the BP/MoS2 photodiode and the high R of the perovskite complemented each other, reaching R of 11 A·W−1 at a reverse bias of −2 V under 457 nm (Figure 2e). The device detected a broadband of light ranging from visible to NIR light, even under zero bias conditions, owing to the relatively small exciton binding energy of MAPbI3 (Figure 2f). Black phosphorus has attracted attention because of its high carrier mobility, low dark current, low noise photodetection due to direct bandgap energy ranging from 0.3 eV to 1.2 eV, compatible with various substrates, and strong photon absorption than monolayer 2D materials [97,98,99,100]. BP has a unique polarization characteristic that distinguishes it from other 2D materials because of its strong and intrinsic in-plane anisotropic properties [101,102]. In 2016, Guo et al. proposed a BP-based photodetector capable of operating over a wide wavelength range (532 nm–3.39 μm) at low picowatts power (Figure 2g) [103]. First, they confirmed the relation between light polarization and carrier collection directions according to IPh. When both the polarization and carrier collection directions were along the x-(armchair) direction, the Iph value was a factor of three larger than when both were along the y-(zigzag) direction. The polarization of scattered light can convey various information, such as the surface roughness, morphology, and orientation of objects, even under hazy/foggy conditions [104,105]. The photogating mechanism working in the device was elucidated. The VG at the IPh peak, as shown in Figure 2h, was close to the VTh rather than the minimum conductance voltage. When the VG around VTh was applied but the device was still in on-state, IPh was maximized as the carrier transition time became shortened. However, when the device was in the off-state as VG larger than VTh was applied, IPh was decreased since both the hole and electron trap states were able to capture the corresponding carriers. The device showed a high R of up to 82 A·W−1 even at room temperature under 3.39 μm of light irradiation.

2.3. CNT-Based Photodetectors

A two-dimensional (2D) halide perovskite forming quantum-well structure is drawing attention for its low-cost efficiency, unique optical property, and moisture stability [4]. However, the ion migration characteristic in halide perovskite induces a long carrier lifetime. Li et al. showed a negative photogating effect of the heterostructure FET by utilizing the structure of CNT and its feasibility as photo-memory (Figure 3a) [106]. The ID of the device was reduced with the increase of 470 nm light intensity (dark to 500 μW) illumination, showing the negative photogating effect (Figure 3b). As the photo-excited electrons migrated into the conduction band, halogen vacancies in the perovskite also migrated through the pathway. It led to a decrease in the diffusion barrier and an increase in the dielectric constant (Figure 3c). The cylindrical structure of CNTs caused potential redistributions, and consequently resulted in VG screening on CNTs by (PEA)2PbI4 (Figure 3d). The migrated ions under light irradiation were captured in a quasi-steady state when back in a dark condition, suggesting a possibility as an optical memory device (Figure 3e). Despite carbon nanotubes (CNTs) being highly light absorbent materials with excellent carrier mobility, binding energy resulting from the unique 1D structure makes them suffer from low operating speed [107,108]. In 2021, Yang et al. implemented IR phototransistors with a PQT-12 (poly (3,3‴-dialkylquaterthiophene)/F4-TCNQ (2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-7,7,8,8-tetracyanoquinodimethane) donor/acceptor (D/A) as a photoactive layer and single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) as a channel layer [109]. The IR phototransistor has shown its feasibility in various fields, such as blackbody detectors, flexible phototransistors, and synaptic devices [110]. The electronic transition energy (0.4 eV) of the D/A complex is due to charge transfer excitation attributed to the broadband photodetection extending from the visible region to the NIR region (400–2600 nm). An R of 2.75 × 106 A·W−1 and detectivity (D*) of 3.12 × 1014 Jones under 2000 nm were obtained with good stability and repeatability. The device responded even when ultra-weak 100 nW·cm−2 light was illuminated (Figure 3f). Under light irradiation, photogenerated holes were injected from the D/A complex to the SWCNTs layer, while photogenerated electrons were trapped at the trap sites present in the D/A complex, defects, or complex/SWCNTs interfaces (Figure 3g).

2.4. Inorganic Compound-Based Photodetectors

The wide bandgap (>3.4 eV of gallium nitride, GaN) of semiconductor materials, including gallium(III) oxide (Ga2O3), MgxZn1−xO, and III-nitride compounds (AlxGa1−xN/AlN and BN), are emerging as the next generation materials for solar-blind ultraviolet (SBUV) photodetectors [111,112]. In 2022, Lu et al. proposed a solar-blind ultraviolet (UV) detector with high photodetection performance and a simple structure and process (Figure 4a) [113]. Spontaneous and piezoelectric polarization of n-Al0.5Ga0.5N generated a perpendicular electric field (EP), which contributes to an increase in IPh because of the photogating effect. Under light irradiation, EP dissociated the photoinduced excitons in the depletion channel region into electrons and holes, respectively. The negatively charged interface accumulated holes, leading to less band bending and more electron injection, thus enhancing the photoconductivity (Figure 4b). The ultrafast rise time of 537.5 ps and R of 105 A·W−1 at 20 V bias were obtained, which took a fast response speed and high R-value. The IOn/IOff ratio of 104 at a very weak intensity of 0.7 nW·cm2 further showed its potential for use as a flame detector. Cadmium zinc telluride (CdZnTe or CZT) is an emerging material as a radiation detector owing to its wide band gap of ~1.68 eV, large photon absorption area, high resistivity of 1010 Ω·cm, and environmental stability [114,115]. However, its applications are limited due to impurities and inherent defects, which lead to the low hole mobility. Shkir et al. accomplished a balanced carrier concentration by inserting indium into the CZT crystal as an additional donor impurity [116]. The photogating effect caused by these additional defects led to a low IOn/IOff ratio and D*, while there was an increase in R and EQE compared to those of intrinsic CZT (Figure 4c). Under light irradiation, the photogenerated electrons trapped at the trap states acted as an additional gate voltage bias, reducing the resistivity of devices (Figure 4d). On the other hand, the photogenerated holes can transit many cycles before the recombination, leading to a high EQE. They showed a new area of research based on CZT crystals for future visible photodetector devices utilizing the photogating effect, along with improving the IOn/IOff ratio or D*.

2.5. Organic-Based Photodetectors

Organic semiconductors have great potential in future optoelectronic and flexible devices with easy bandgap tunability, fabrication simplicity, cost efficiency, large-area processability, and resolvability [117,118,119]. 2,7-dioctyl[1]benzothieno[3,2-b][1]benzothiophene (C8-BTBT) is used widely because of its stability in air and its carrier mobility [120,121]. The newly proposed HL-OPT structure consisted of a channel layer of C8-BTBT, a photoactive D/A layer of C8-BTBT:PC61BM hybrid material, and an interlayer of molybdenum trioxide (MoO3) (Figure 5a). The charge-selective interlayer assists hole injection into the channel and prevents electrons from recombining with the holes. The interlayer physically separates the channel layer and photoactive layer, improving photodetection performance. The photoinduced electrons are trapped at the PC61BM, enhancing the hole concentration of the channel by the photogating effect (Figure 5b). As a result, R = 8.6 × 103 A W−1 and D* = 3.4 × 1014 Jones were obtained, even under weak UV irradiation (intensity of 32 μW·cm−2). Furthermore, the device detected UV successfully, even on a bendable polyethylene terephthalate (PET) substrate (Figure 5c). All-inorganic cesium lead halide (CsPbX3) (X = I, Br, and Cl) perovskites have a moderate bandgap, weakly bound excitons, high absorption coefficient, long carrier lifetime, and low-cost fabrication [122,123]. On the other hand, their unstable phase transition has limited their applications [124,125]. Phase stability could be achieved by reducing its dimension to the nanoscale. In 2018, Chen et al. fabricated a heterostructure photodetector with C8-BTBT and a dip-coated cesium lead iodide (CsPbI3) nanorod (NR) thin film (Figure 5d) [120]. The energy level difference between C8-BTBT and CsPbI3 NR, forming a type- II heterojunction, enabled efficient photogenerated hole transport and protected photogenerated charge from recombination. When white LED was irradiated, photocarriers were generated in the CsPbI3 and dissociated near the CsPbI3/C8-BTBT interface. The photogenerated holes transferred to the channel layer, while the electrons were trapped at the CsPbI3, acting as an extra negative gate bias (Figure 5e). Vth increased as a function of the light intensity, indicating the photogating effect, as well (Figure 5f). An R up to 4.3 × 103 A·W−1 was obtained. In 2021, Zhao et al. devised a unique strategy using a [12-(benzo[b]benzo[4,5]thieno[2,3-d]thiophen-2-yl)dodecyl)]phosphonic acid self-assembled monolayer (BTBT-SAM) for the all-2D hybrid organic–inorganic vdW heterojunction phototransistors (Figure 5g) [126]. They transferred the monolayer MoS2 (1L-MoS2) crystal onto a uniform surface of the organic thin films. The photogenerated holes are transferred to the BTBT-SAM layer outside the MoS2 crystal region, while the photogenerated electrons are left inside the crystal (Figure 5h). The device showed an R of 475 A·W−1, ascribed to the photogating effect.

2.6. Oxide-Based Photodetectors

In 2019, Guan et al. introduced tin monoxide (SnO) as a new p-type oxide-based phototransistor [127]. Although the SnO-based device itself exhibited a good photodetection performance with R = 1.83 × 103 A·W−1 (Figure 6a) and a broadband response from the UV to visible range (365–655 nm) (Figure 6b), its moderate light absorption characteristic drew attention to other methods. Therefore, a photodetector with better performance was realized by coating hybrid perovskite MAPbI3 as a photoactive layer for a smooth charge transfer from perovskite to p-type SnO (Figure 6c). MAPbI3 only covered the channel layer and did not contact the electrodes. When exposed to white light, the on-state current increased, and the off-state current decreased compared to the dark state. When VG > 0 V (panel (i) in Figure 6e), the IOff was decreased because of charge recombination as the electrons generated in MAPbI3 were transported to the SnO, and because of the photogating effect, as photogenerated holes remained in the perovskite layer. Because the opposite carrier movement was observed when VG < 0 (panel (iii) in Figure 6e), the photogenerated holes migrated to the SnO, and the photogenerated electrons remained in the MAPbI3. The additional negative gate bias was ascribed to the photogating effect and the increased hole injection, leading to an increase of the IOn (Figure 6d). Therefore, the IOn/IOff ratio increased from 519 to 2674, and μ increased from 3.46 to 5.53 cm2·V−1·s−1. Wide-band-gap semiconductor-based optoelectronics respond in the deep-ultraviolet (DUV) range, bringing their solar-blind properties to industrial, biological, environmental, and military applications [128,129]. In 2021, Ahn et al. chose β-Ga2O3 as the photo-absorption and channel layer, which provides a detection wavelength at 230–280 nm [130]. By adding Al2O3 encapsulated MgO layer on top of the device, the device showed no hump in transfer curves unlike the device without MgO layer (Figure 6f,g). A high R and D* of 2.3 × 107 A·W−1 and 1.7 × 1015 Jones, respectively, were obtained with the β-Ga2O3/MgO heterostructure-based phototransistor. This was possible because of the defect-assisted charge transfer mechanism. When VG was smaller than VTh, photo-excited hole carriers and oxygen ion vacancies were accumulated at the deep oxygen defect trap sites in the SiO2/β-Ga2O3 interface, shifting the VTh to a negative gate bias (process 1 in Figure 6h). At the same time, the photogenerated electrons were accumulated at the β-Ga2O3/MgO junction, suppressing the photoconductive effect and only allowing the photogating effect to appear (process 2 in Figure 6h).

3. Application

The photogating effect has been used mainly to improve photodetection performance. On the other hand, recent studies have been reported in which the photogating effect further plays a role as a key mechanism of application. In particular, it began to be applied in neuromorphic devices [131,132,133,134] and optoelectronic memory [135,136,137], focusing on the photogating effect and the PPC behavior.
Neuromorphic device studies to mimic the human brain operating at ultra-low power consumption and ultra-high efficiency have been explored to solve the bottleneck problem of the von Neumann architecture. In 2021, Zhu et al. exploited the photogating effect in an optoelectronic sensor for future potential artificial vision systems [138]. They implemented a flexible CNTs/CsPbBr3-quantum dots (QDs) heterostructure-based optoelectronic sensor array with 1024 pixels (Figure 7a). The photogenerated holes were dissociated with electrons in CsPbBr3-QDs and dispersed to the CNTs, while the remaining photogenerated electrons were trapped in the QD layer. When the light pulse was applied, the trapped electrons induced more hole carriers through capacitive coupling, increasing the current flow in the channel through the photogating effect (Figure 7b). The device exhibited R = 5.1 × 107 A·W−1 and a D* = 2 × 1016 Jones. In addition, the long electron decay time induced PPC behavior in the device. When a second optical pulse was applied, more electrons were trapped because of the higher electric field, resulting in a higher current (Figure 7c). Furthermore, 0, 10, 20, 50, 100, and 200 pulses under 1 μW·cm2 of weak light were applied for training a sensor array to mimic the recognition process of a human face (Figure 7d). As the number of pulses increased, learning of the facial features was reinforced. The nociceptor is a sensory neuron that perceives pain according to external stimuli. Based on the bidirectional responses, it receives and transmits signals to the spinal cord and brain. After perceived pain in the nociceptor, the relaxation process proceeded by decreasing the signal. In 2022, Ji et al. fabricated a bidirectional synaptic device with organic materials, which are copper-phthalocyanine (CuPc) and poly(vinylidene fluoridetrifluoroethylene) (P(VDF-TrFE)) [139]. Au electrodes, a P(VDF-TrFE)/CuPc heterostructure semiconductor, and an ITO electrode served as the presynaptic membranes, synaptic cleft, and postsynaptic membrane, respectively. Various synaptic performances, such as excitatory or inhibitory postsynaptic current (EPSC/IPSC), paired-pulse facilitation (PPF), spiking-rate-dependent plasticity (SRDP), short- or long-term potentiation (STP/LTP), spike-number-dependent-plasticity (SNDP), and spike-width-dependent-plasticity (SWDP), were fully modulated with light. P(VDF-TrFE) is a ferroelectric material that is polarized by an external electric field. Therefore, the PPC behavior was dependent on the presence of P(VDF-TrFE) and its polarization direction when irradiated with light of 660 nm, the wavelength spectrum to which CuPc responds. The EPSC decayed slowly when the polarization direction of P(VDF-TrFE) was in a downward state rather than in an upward state or no direction. This was attributed to the strong photogating effect in which the energy barrier in the P(VDF-TrFE)/CuPc interface interfered with the dissociation of nonequilibrium holes into the electrode (Figure 7e). Interestingly, successive increases and decreases in IPh, leading to EPSC and IPSC were controlled by applying 660 nm and 445 nm of light, respectively (Figure 7g). This bidirectional photoresponsive characteristic enabled the device to mimic the action and relaxation processes of the nociceptor in an entirely optical manner (Figure 7h). The energy of 445 nm light attenuated the photogating effect by reducing the number of trapped electrons, resulting in the NPC effect (Figure 7f).
Conventional memory is no longer sufficient to meet the modern needs of ultrahigh-density data storage, such as multilevel storage, data encryption, image capturing, information recording, logic data processing, and wearable sensors [140,141,142]. Therefore, new memory devices that transmit information quickly with low energy consumption are in demand. In 2022, Kim et al. reported an ambipolar photo-memory-transistor using a π-conjugated p-type Poly[(2,6-(4,8-bis(5-(2-ethylhexyl)thiophen-2-yl)-benzo [1,2-b:4,5-b′]dithiophene))-alt-(5,5-(1′,3′-di-2-thienyl-5′,7′-bis(2-ethylhexyl)benzo [1′,2′-c:4′,5′-c′]dithiophene-4,8-dione)] (PBDB-T) and n-type N2200 macromolecular copolymer (P(BDBT-co-N2200)) (Figure 8a) [143]. The transistor exhibited high hysteresis because of the interfacial trap states. These intrinsically localized quantum states are according to the amorphous phase of the D/A heterojunction. On the other hand, hysteresis was reduced and IPh was increased when irradiated with light because of the photogating effect by the charges trapped at the trap states. The trapped charge carriers determined the writing (W) (Figure 8b), reading (R) (Figure 8c), and erasing (E) (Figure 8d) states of the optoelectronic memory device by adjusting the VG and light irradiation conditions, respectively (Figure 8e). The device showed reliable storage performance with a constant readout current owing to the relatively strongly trapped carriers.

4. Summary and Outlook

This review provided a comprehensive insight on photogating-based photodetectors. Photogating reviews focused mainly on 2D material-based photodetectors were expanded in this paper to various active materials, including perovskite, organics, compounds, polymers, and oxides, as well as 2D materials. The strategies to improve the photodetection performance, the structure, material, and mechanism were organized and classified by channel material. Most of the studies utilized p-type semiconductors as a channel, and implemented heterostructures to increase the defects or vacancies and modulate the energy band. Some studies utilized the polarization characteristic of materials for potential redistribution. The features are summarized in Table 2 [5].
Furthermore, efforts to implement the photogating effect with emerging applications in neuromorphic devices and optoelectronic memories were revisited. We expect that the photogating effect will be used more actively without material limitation, helping to realize applications of various fields, as well as memory and neuromorphic devices. Nonetheless, still there are difficulties to be overcome, as follows:
(i)
Operational stability in photogating effect-based devices is an issue that must be addressed. Since the photogating effect forms an additional gate bias by the trapped carrier, bias stress instability should exist due to the trapped charges. To allow these devices to be used as practical applications, an effective strategy that exhibits the photogating effect with operational stability is absolutely necessary.
(ii)
There is a need to explore more various active materials, as previous research efforts tended to focus on 2D materials for implementing the photogating effect and its application. As another material aspect, efforts on n-type materials-based photogating effect devices are lacking. Most of the photogating effect-based devices are based on p-type materials, such as WSe2, MoS2, and C8-BTBT, and, thus, the use of the counterpart n-type materials is required.
(iii)
To develop high-performance photogating effect-based photodetection, it must be designed in consideration of transistor characteristics. Basically, light exposure is distinguished by a VTh shift in this kind of the photogating effect-based devices. For this reason, transistor parameters, such as dielectric and semiconductor layer thickness, surface interface characteristics, source drain, and gate electrode work function, must be simultaneously considered to effectively change VTh by the photogating effect.
(iv)
Efforts on reproducibility and uniformity should be made to extend these photogating effect-based devices to more diverse applications. Large-scale and robust integration, which is required for advanced applications, can be obtained by the assurance of the technology reproducibility and uniformity.
Although the above-described challenges are required to be overcome, the potential of the photogating effect is clear; detection of sub-bandgap rays is available and high sensitivity photodetection can be obtained by the shift of VTh. Based on the revisited advances in recent photogating effect-based devices, this review suggests the possibility that the photogating effect can be used as another alternative mechanism for the development of next-generation optoelectronic devices.

Author Contributions

H.Y. initiated the research project. J.S. performed the literature survey and research analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean Government (MSIT) (NRF-2022R1C1C1004590). This work was supported by the Technology Innovation Program (00144300, Interface Technology of 3D Stacked Heterogeneous System for SCM-based Process-in-Memory) and national standard technology development and dissemination (1415180163, standardization research and development for evaluation of characteristics of neuromorphic devices for intelligent semiconductors) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE, Republic of Korea).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ouyang, W.; Teng, F.; He, J.H.; Fang, X. Enhancing the photoelectric performance of photodetectors based on metal oxide semiconductors by charge-carrier engineering. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1807672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, F.; Zou, X.; Xu, M.; Wang, H.; Wang, H.; Guo, H.; Guo, J.; Wang, P.; Peng, M.; Wang, Z. Recent progress on electrical and optical manipulations of perovskite photodetectors. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2100569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chow, P.C.; Someya, T. Organic photodetectors for next-generation wearable electronics. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1902045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ting, L.; Wei-Ming, L.; Wen-Xing, L.; Bo-Yao, C.; Rui, H.; Wen-Hua, S.; Zhong-Ming, Z. Photogating effect in two-dimensional photodetectors. Wuli 2021, 70, 027801. [Google Scholar]
  5. Fang, H.; Hu, W. Photogating in low dimensional photodetectors. Adv. Sci. 2017, 4, 1700323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Venettacci, C.; Martín-García, B.; Prato, M.; Moreels, I.; De Iacovo, A. Increasing responsivity and air stability of PbS colloidal quantum dot photoconductors with iodine surface ligands. Nanotechnology 2019, 30, 405204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sun, B.; Zhou, G.; Wang, Y.; Xu, X.; Tao, L.; Zhao, N.; Tsang, H.K.; Wang, X.; Chen, Z.; Xu, J.B. Ultra-Narrowband Photodetector with High Responsivity Enabled by Integrating Monolayer J-Aggregate Organic Crystal with Graphene. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2021, 9, 2100158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Iivonen, T.; Heikkilä, M.J.; Popov, G.; Nieminen, H.-E.; Kaipio, M.; Kemell, M.; Mattinen, M.; Meinander, K.; Mizohata, K.; Räisänen, J. Atomic layer deposition of photoconductive Cu2O thin films. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 11205–11214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Wang, Z.; Yu, X.; Qiu, X.; Fu, J.; Yang, D. High-responsivity graphene/hyperdoped-silicon heterostructure infrared photodetectors. Opt. Laser Technol. 2022, 153, 108291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Selamneni, V.; Adepu, V.; Raghavan, H.; Sahatiya, P. Ultra-High Responsivity and Enhanced Trap Assisted Charge Transfer by utilizing Ti3C2TX (MXene) as a Transport Layer for ReS2 based Flexible Broadband Photodetector: A better Alternative to Graphene. FlatChem 2022, 33, 100363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ren, Y.; Dai, T.; Luo, W.; Liu, X. Fabrication of lead selenide thin film photodiode for near-infrared detection via O2-plasma treatment. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 753, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mosaddegh, A.; Noroozi, A.; Javadi, M.; Abdi, Y. Ultrahigh photovoltage responsivity of PEDOT: PSS–silicon hybrid heterojunction photodiodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 117, 073301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kim, Y.; Kim, J.; Kim, H.M.; Jang, J. Quantum-Dots Photosensor with Wide Bandgap P-Type and N-Type Oxide Semiconductors for High Detectivity and Responsivity. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2020, 5, 1900857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Esteves, B.; Pimenta, S.; Vieira, E.M.; Freitas, J.R.; Rodrigues, J.A.; Correia, J.H. SnOx and a-Si thin-films based photodiode in a flexible substrate for visible spectral region. Mater. Lett. 2021, 286, 129251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mennel, L.; Symonowicz, J.; Wachter, S.; Polyushkin, D.K.; Molina-Mendoza, A.J.; Mueller, T. Ultrafast machine vision with 2D material neural network image sensors. Nature 2020, 579, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gao, Y.; Yi, Y.; Wang, X.; Meng, H.; Lei, D.; Yu, X.F.; Chu, P.K.; Li, J. A novel hybrid-layered organic phototransistor enables efficient intermolecular charge transfer and carrier transport for ultrasensitive photodetection. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1900763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hu, L.; Liao, Q.; Xu, Z.; Yuan, J.; Ke, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Wang, G.P.; Ruan, S.; Zeng, Y.-J. Defect reconstruction triggered full-color photodetection in single nanowire phototransistor. ACS Photonics 2019, 6, 886–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lan, H.-Y.; Hsieh, Y.-H.; Chiao, Z.-Y.; Jariwala, D.; Shih, M.-H.; Yen, T.-J.; Hess, O.; Lu, Y.-J. Gate-tunable plasmon-enhanced photodetection in a monolayer MoS2 phototransistor with ultrahigh photoresponsivity. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 3083–3091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ni, Z.; Ma, L.; Du, S.; Xu, Y.; Yuan, M.; Fang, H.; Wang, Z.; Xu, M.; Li, D.; Yang, J. Plasmonic silicon quantum dots enabled high-sensitivity ultrabroadband photodetection of graphene-based hybrid phototransistors. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 9854–9862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nikitskiy, I.; Goossens, S.; Kufer, D.; Lasanta, T.; Navickaite, G.; Koppens, F.H.; Konstantatos, G. Integrating an electrically active colloidal quantum dot photodiode with a graphene phototransistor. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Park, S.; Kim, S.J.; Nam, J.H.; Pitner, G.; Lee, T.H.; Ayzner, A.L.; Wang, H.; Fong, S.W.; Vosgueritchian, M.; Park, Y.J. Significant Enhancement of Infrared Photodetector Sensitivity Using a Semiconducting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube/C60 Phototransistor. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 759–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wang, W.; Dong, Y.; Lee, S.-Y.; Loke, W.-K.; Lei, D.; Yoon, S.-F.; Liang, G.; Gong, X.; Yeo, Y.-C. Floating-base germanium-tin heterojunction phototransistor for high-efficiency photodetection in short-wave infrared range. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 18502–18507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wei, S.; Wang, F.; Zou, X.; Wang, L.; Liu, C.; Liu, X.; Hu, W.; Fan, Z.; Ho, J.C.; Liao, L. Flexible quasi-2D perovskite/IGZO phototransistors for ultrasensitive and broadband photodetection. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1907527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yuan, S.; Zhang, H.; Wang, P.; Ling, L.; Tu, L.; Lu, H.; Wang, J.; Zhan, Y.; Zheng, L. High-gain broadband organolead trihalide perovskite photodetector based on a bipolar heterojunction phototransistor. Org. Electron. 2018, 57, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Island, J.O.; Blanter, S.I.; Buscema, M.; van der Zant, H.S.; Castellanos-Gomez, A. Gate controlled photocurrent generation mechanisms in high-gain In2Se3 phototransistors. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 7853–7858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Baek, S.-H.; Lee, G.-W.; Cho, C.-Y.; Lee, S.-N. Gate-controlled amplifiable ultraviolet AlGaN/GaN high-electron-mobility phototransistor. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 7172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gong, C.; Chu, J.; Qian, S.; Yin, C.; Hu, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, Y.; Ding, X.; Jiang, S.; Li, A. Large-Scale Ultrathin 2D Wide-Bandgap BiOBr Nanoflakes for Gate-Controlled Deep-Ultraviolet Phototransistors. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1908242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Gréboval, C.; Noumbé, U.N.; Chu, A.; Prado, Y.; Khalili, A.; Dabard, C.; Dang, T.H.; Colis, S.; Chaste, J.; Ouerghi, A. Gate tunable vertical geometry phototransistor based on infrared HgTe nanocrystals. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 117, 251104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, X.; Yao, X.; Li, Z.; Zhou, C.; Yuan, X.; Tang, Z.; Hu, W.; Gan, X.; Zou, J.; Chen, P. Surface-states-modulated high-performance InAs nanowire phototransistor. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 6413–6419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wu, Y.; Yin, Z.; Xiao, J.; Liu, Y.; Wei, F.; Tan, K.J.; Kloc, C.; Huang, L.; Yan, Q.; Hu, F. Crystal structure and phototransistor behavior of N-substituted heptacence. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 1883–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ji, H.-X.; Hu, J.-S.; Wan, L.-J. ZnOEP based phototransistor: Signal amplification and light-controlled switch. Chem. Commun. 2008, 2653–2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lansley, S.P.; Looi, H.J.; Wang, Y.; Whitfield, M.D.; Jackman, R.B. A thin-film diamond phototransistor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1999, 74, 615–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Maeng, W.; Lee, S.-H.; Kwon, J.-D.; Park, J.; Park, J.-S. Atomic layer deposited p-type copper oxide thin films and the associated thin film transistor properties. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 5517–5522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, S.; Tian, M.; Gao, Q.; Wang, M.; Li, T.; Hu, Q.; Li, X.; Wu, Y. Nanometre-thin indium tin oxide for advanced high-performance electronics. Nat. Mater. 2019, 18, 1091–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Seo, J.; Kim, S.; Yoo, H. A Complementary Logic-In-Memory Inverter from Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Transistors. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2022, 43, 1902–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kim, J.; Kim, M.-G.; Facchetti, A.; Park, S.K. Analysis of Low-Frequency Noise in Quantum Dot/Metal-Oxide Phototransistors With Metal Chalcogenide Interfaces. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2022, 43, 1499–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, Z.; Feng, Z.; Xu, Y.; Feng, Q.; Zhu, W.; Chen, D.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, C.; Hao, Y. High performance β-Ga2O3 solar-blind metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect phototransistor with hafnium oxide gate dielectric process. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2021, 42, 545–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhou, K.-J.; Chen, P.-H.; Zheng, Y.-Z.; Tai, M.-C.; Wang, Y.-X.; Chien, Y.-T.; Sun, P.-J.; Huang, H.-C.; Chang, T.-C.; Sze, S.M. Heterogeneous metal oxide channel structure for ultra-high sensitivity phototransistor with modulated operating conditions. J. Mater. Chem. C 2022, 10, 9192–9197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Park, J.B.; Kim, J.; Jang, Y.W.; Park, H.B.; Yang, S.H.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, M.; Facchetti, A.; Park, S.K. Analysis of Carrier Transport in Quantum Dot/Metal-Oxide Phototransistors via Light-Mediated Interfacial Modeling. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2022, 11, 2201559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jeong, J.H.; Shin, J.S.; Ma, J.H.; Kang, S.J.; Kang, S.J. Highly enhanced visible light photodetection properties of a ZnO phototransistor via an additional solution processed thin Al2O3 layer. J. Mater. Chem. C 2022, 10, 14770–14777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, K.; Zhang, X.; Chen, P.A.; Guo, J.; He, M.; Chen, Y.; Qiu, X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, H.; Zeng, Z.; et al. Solution-Processed CsPbBr3 Quantum Dots/Organic Semiconductor Planar Heterojunctions for High-Performance Photodetectors. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, e2105856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Han, S.; Yang, Z.; Li, Z.; Zhuang, X.; Akinwande, D.; Yu, J. Improved room temperature NO2 sensing performance of organic field-effect transistor by directly blending a hole-transporting/electron-blocking polymer into the active layer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 38280–38286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, Q.; Ran, Y.; Shi, W.; Qin, M.; Sun, Y.; Kuang, J.; Wang, H.; Chen, H.; Guo, Y.; Liu, Y. High-performance near-infrared polymeric phototransistors realized by combining cross-linked polymeric semiconductors and bulk heterojunction bilayer structures. Appl. Mater. Today 2021, 22, 100899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, X.; Zhao, F.; Xue, Z.; Yuan, Y.; Huang, M.; Zhang, G.; Ding, Y.; Qiu, L. Highly Sensitive Polymer Phototransistor Based on the Synergistic Effect of Chemical and Physical Blending in D (Donor)–A (Acceptor) Copolymers. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2019, 5, 1900174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dong, Y.; Chen, M.; Yiu, W.K.; Zhu, Q.; Zhou, G.; Kershaw, S.V.; Ke, N.; Wong, C.P.; Rogach, A.L.; Zhao, N. Solution processed hybrid polymer: HgTe quantum dot phototransistor with high sensitivity and fast infrared response up to 2400 nm at room temperature. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 2000068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Han, T.; Wang, Z.; Shen, N.; Zhou, Z.; Hou, X.; Ding, S.; Jiang, C.; Huang, X.; Zhang, X.; Liu, L. Diffusion interface layer controlling the acceptor phase of bilayer near-infrared polymer phototransistors with ultrahigh photosensitivity. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Tarsoly, G.; Pyo, S. Photocurrent Response in Ambipolar Transistors Based on Single Laterally Stacked Crystals: The Role of Charge Trapping and Release. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 5533–5540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Onojima, N.; Akiyama, N.; Mori, Y.; Sugai, T.; Obata, S. Small molecule/polymer blends prepared by environmentally-friendly process for mechanically-stable flexible organic field-effect transistors. Org. Electron. 2020, 78, 105597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Panidi, J.; Kainth, J.; Paterson, A.F.; Wang, S.; Tsetseris, L.; Emwas, A.H.; McLachlan, M.A.; Heeney, M.; Anthopoulos, T.D. Introducing a nonvolatile N-type dopant drastically improves electron transport in polymer and small-molecule organic transistors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1902784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Parr, Z.S.; Rashid, R.B.; Paulsen, B.D.; Poggi, B.; Tan, E.; Freeley, M.; Palma, M.; Abrahams, I.; Rivnay, J.; Nielsen, C.B. Semiconducting Small Molecules as Active Materials for p-Type Accumulation Mode Organic Electrochemical Transistors. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2020, 6, 2000215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ji, D.; Li, T.; Liu, J.; Amirjalayer, S.; Zhong, M.; Zhang, Z.-Y.; Huang, X.; Wei, Z.; Dong, H.; Hu, W. Band-like transport in small-molecule thin films toward high mobility and ultrahigh detectivity phototransistor arrays. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Lim, D.-H.; Kang, M.; Jang, S.-Y.; Hwang, K.; Kim, I.-B.; Jung, E.; Jo, Y.-R.; Kim, Y.-J.; Kim, J.; Choi, H. Unsymmetrical small molecules for broad-band photoresponse and efficient charge transport in organic phototransistors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 25066–25074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ji, D.; Jiang, T.; Zheng, Y.; Sun, Y.; Wei, Z.; Li, L.; Hu, W. Band-Like Charge Transport in Small-Molecule Thin Film toward High-Performance Organic Phototransistors at Low Temperature. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2022, 10, 2102484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Guan, Y.-S.; Qiao, J.; Liang, Y.; Bisoyi, H.K.; Wang, C.; Xu, W.; Zhu, D.; Li, Q. A high mobility air-stable n-type organic small molecule semiconductor with high UV–visible-to-NIR photoresponse. Light Sci. Appl. 2022, 11, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Sun, H.; Liu, H.; Liu, F.; Liu, H.; Jiang, C.; Zhang, Y. Phototransistors Based on Organic Small Molecules–Ruddlesden-Popper Layered Perovskite Single Crystal Heterojunctions. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 9, 2101850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tu, W.; Liu, T.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, G.; Chen, H.; Wang, M. Ultra-wide bandgap organic acceptor material and its application in organic UV photodetector. Synth. Met. 2016, 219, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Luo, F.; Zhu, M.; Tan, Y.; Sun, H.; Luo, W.; Peng, G.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, X.-A.; Qin, S. High responsivity graphene photodetectors from visible to near-infrared by photogating effect. AIP Adv. 2018, 8, 115106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Han, J.; Wang, J.; Yang, M.; Kong, X.; Chen, X.; Huang, Z.; Guo, H.; Gou, J.; Tao, S.; Liu, Z.; et al. Graphene/Organic Semiconductor Heterojunction Phototransistors with Broadband and Bi-directional Photoresponse. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, e1804020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Liao, F.; Deng, J.; Chen, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; Zhu, H.; Chen, L.; Sun, Q.; Hu, W.; et al. A Dual-Gate MoS2 Photodetector Based on Interface Coupling Effect. Small 2020, 16, e1904369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Feng, S.; Liu, C.; Zhu, Q.; Su, X.; Qian, W.; Sun, Y.; Wang, C.; Li, B.; Chen, M.; Chen, L. An ultrasensitive molybdenum-based double-heterojunction phototransistor. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yu, P.; Zeng, Q.; Zhu, C.; Zhou, L.; Zhao, W.; Tong, J.; Liu, Z.; Yang, G. Ternary Ta2PdS6 atomic layers for an ultrahigh broadband photoresponsive phototransistor. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2005607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kim, S.-G.; Kim, S.-H.; Park, J.; Kim, G.-S.; Park, J.-H.; Saraswat, K.C.; Kim, J.; Yu, H.-Y. Infrared detectable MoS2 phototransistor and its application to artificial multilevel optic-neural synapse. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 10294–10300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yao, J.; Chen, F.; Li, J.; Du, J.; Wu, D.; Tian, Y.; Zhang, C.; Yang, J.; Li, X.; Lin, P. A high-performance short-wave infrared phototransistor based on a 2D tellurium/MoS2 van der Waals heterojunction. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 13123–13131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tong, T.; Chen, Y.; Qin, S.; Li, W.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, C.; Yuan, X.; Chen, X.; Nie, Z. Sensitive and Ultrabroadband Phototransistor Based on Two-Dimensional Bi2O2Se Nanosheets. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1905806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Fang, H.; Wu, P.; Wang, P.; Zheng, Z.; Tang, Y.; Ho, J.C.; Chen, G.; Wang, Y.; Shan, C.; Cheng, X.; et al. Global Photocurrent Generation in Phototransistors Based on Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes toward Highly Sensitive Infrared Detection. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1900597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bergemann, K.; Léonard, F. Room-temperature phototransistor with negative photoresponsivity of 108 AW−1 Using fullerene-sensitized aligned carbon nanotubes. Small 2018, 14, 1802806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Bergemann, K.; Leonard, F. Giga-gain at room temperature in functionalized carbon nanotube phototransistors based on a nonequilibrium mechanism. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 10421–10427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Qian, L.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, J. Band engineering of carbon nanotubes for device applications. Matter 2020, 3, 664–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hong, S.-H.; Afraj, S.N.; Huang, P.-Y.; Yeh, Y.-Z.; Tung, S.-H.; Chen, M.-C.; Liu, C.-L. Photoelectric effect of hybrid ultraviolet-sensitized phototransistors from an n-type organic semiconductor and an all-inorganic perovskite quantum dot photosensitizer. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 20498–20507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Trukhanov, V.A. Spatially localized photoelectric effect in ambipolar organic field-effect phototransistors. JETP Lett. 2019, 109, 776–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gao, Y.; Ge, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, J.; Liu, W.; Cao, Y.; Gu, K.; Guo, Z.; Wei, Y.M.; Zhou, N. Ultrathin and Ultrasensitive Direct X-ray Detector Based on Heterojunction Phototransistors. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2101717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yang, S.; Li, J.; Song, P.; Guo, N.; Liu, J.; Ye, X.; Cai, H.; Ni, J.; Zhang, J. Investigation of 3D and 2D/3D heterojunction perovskite-based phototransistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2022, 120, 263501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Schirripa Spagnolo, G.; Leccese, F.; Leccisi, M. LED as transmitter and receiver of light: A simple tool to demonstration photoelectric effect. Crystals 2019, 9, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Huang, H.; Wang, J.; Hu, W.; Liao, L.; Wang, P.; Wang, X.; Gong, F.; Chen, Y.; Wu, G.; Luo, W. Highly sensitive visible to infrared MoTe2 photodetectors enhanced by the photogating effect. Nanotechnology 2016, 27, 445201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Jiang, H.; Wei, J.; Sun, F.; Nie, C.; Fu, J.; Shi, H.; Sun, J.; Wei, X.; Qiu, C.-W. Enhanced Photogating Effect in Graphene Photodetectors via Potential Fluctuation Engineering. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 4458–4466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Li, D.; Jia, Z.; Tang, Y.; Song, C.; Liang, K.; Ren, H.; Li, F.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Lu, X. Inorganic–organic hybrid phototransistor array with enhanced photogating effect for dynamic near-infrared light sensing and image preprocessing. Nano Lett. 2022, 22, 5434–5442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Joshi, S.; Dubey, P.K.; Kaushik, B.K. Photosensor Based on Split Gate TMD TFET Using Photogating Effect for Visible Light Detection. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 20, 6346–6353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Deng, J.; Zong, L.; Zhu, M.; Liao, F.; Xie, Y.; Guo, Z.; Liu, J.; Lu, B.; Wang, J.; Hu, W. MoS2/HfO2/Silicon-On-Insulator Dual-Photogating Transistor with Ambipolar Photoresponsivity for High-Resolution Light Wavelength Detection. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1906242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Vaquero, D.; Clericò, V.; Salvador-Sánchez, J.; Díaz, E.; Domínguez-Adame, F.; Chico, L.; Meziani, Y.M.; Diez, E.; Quereda, J. Fast response photogating in monolayer MoS2 phototransistors. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 16156–16163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Gao, K.; Ran, S.; Han, Q.; Yang, Q.; Jiang, H.; Fu, J.; Leng, C.; Feng, S.; Zhou, D.; Li, Z.; et al. High zero-bias responsivity induced by photogating effect in asymmetric device structure. Opt. Mater. 2022, 124, 112013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Qiu, Q.; Li, J.; Wu, T.; Jiang, L.; Li, Y.; Ma, W.; Yao, N.; Huang, Z. High performance of a broadband room-temperature Si detector beyond the cut-off wavelength. J. Mater. Chem. C 2022, 10, 6374–6379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Buscema, M.; Island, J.O.; Groenendijk, D.J.; Blanter, S.I.; Steele, G.A.; van der Zant, H.S.; Castellanos-Gomez, A. Photocurrent generation with two-dimensional van der Waals semiconductors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 3691–3718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Fukushima, S.; Shimatani, M.; Okuda, S.; Ogawa, S.; Kanai, Y.; Ono, T.; Matsumoto, K. High responsivity middle-wavelength infrared graphene photodetectors using photo-gating. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 113, 061102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kim, H.J.; Lee, K.J.; Park, J.; Shin, G.H.; Park, H.; Yu, K.; Choi, S.Y. Photoconductivity Switching in MoTe2/Graphene Heterostructure by Trap-Assisted Photogating. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 38563–38569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Nguyen, V.T.; Yim, W.; Park, S.J.; Son, B.H.; Kim, Y.C.; Cao, T.T.; Sim, Y.; Moon, Y.J.; Nguyen, V.C.; Seong, M.J. Phototransistors with Negative or Ambipolar Photoresponse Based on As-Grown Heterostructures of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube and MoS2. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1802572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Pulikodan, V.K.; Alexander, A.; Pillai, A.B.; Namboothiry, M.A. Photoresponse of solution-processed molybdenum disulfide nanosheet-based photodetectors. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 10057–10066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Miller, B.; Parzinger, E.; Vernickel, A.; Holleitner, A.W.; Wurstbauer, U. Photogating of mono-and few-layer MoS2. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 122103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Wang, L.; Zou, X.; Lin, J.; Jiang, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhao, X.; Liu, Y.F.; Ho, J.C.; Liao, L. Perovskite/black phosphorus/MoS2 photogate reversed photodiodes with ultrahigh light on/off ratio and fast response. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 4804–4813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Huo, N.; Konstantatos, G. Recent progress and future prospects of 2D-based photodetectors. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1801164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Li, C.; Zhu, J.; Du, W.; Huang, Y.; Xu, H.; Zhai, Z.; Zou, G. The photodetectors based on lateral monolayer MoS2/WS2 heterojunctions. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2021, 16, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yamamoto, M.; Ueno, K.; Tsukagoshi, K. Pronounced photogating effect in atomically thin WSe2 with a self-limiting surface oxide layer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 112, 181902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Wang, X.; Qarony, W.; Cheng, P.K.; Ismail, M.; Tsang, Y.H. Photoluminescence of PdS2 and PdSe2 quantum dots. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 38077–38084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Zeng, L.H.; Lin, S.H.; Li, Z.J.; Zhang, Z.X.; Zhang, T.F.; Xie, C.; Mak, C.H.; Chai, Y.; Lau, S.P.; Luo, L.B. Fast, self-driven, air-stable, and broadband photodetector based on vertically aligned PtSe2/GaAs heterojunction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1705970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Yang, Y.; Li, J.; Choi, S.; Jeon, S.; Cho, J.H.; Lee, B.H.; Lee, S. High-responsivity PtSe2 photodetector enhanced by photogating effect. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2021, 118, 013103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. He, J.; Wang, C.; Zhou, B.; Zhao, Y.; Tao, L.; Zhang, H. 2D van der Waals heterostructures: Processing, optical properties and applications in ultrafast photonics. Mater. Horiz. 2020, 7, 2903–2921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhang, Z.; Si, M.; Peng, S.; Zhang, F.; Wang, Y.; Xue, D. Bandgap engineering in van der Waals heterostructures of blue phosphorene and MoS2: A first principles calculation. J. Solid State Chem. 2015, 231, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Kundu, A.; Rani, R.; Raturi, M.; Hazra, K.S. Photogating-Induced Controlled Electrical Response in 2D Black Phosphorus. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2020, 2, 3562–3570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ling, X.; Wang, H.; Huang, S.; Xia, F.; Dresselhaus, M.S. The renaissance of black phosphorus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 4523–4530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Xu, J.; Song, Y.J.; Park, J.-H.; Lee, S. Graphene/black phosphorus heterostructured photodetector. Solid-State Electron. 2018, 144, 86–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Bagheri, S.; Mansouri, N.; Aghaie, E. Phosphorene: A new competitor for graphene. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 4085–4095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wang, J.; Rousseau, A.; Eizner, E.; Phaneuf-L’Heureux, A.-L.; Schue, L.; Francoeur, S.; Kéna-Cohen, S. Spectral responsivity and photoconductive gain in thin film black phosphorus photodetectors. ACS Photonics 2019, 6, 3092–3099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Xia, F.; Wang, H.; Jia, Y. Rediscovering black phosphorus as an anisotropic layered material for optoelectronics and electronics. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Guo, Q.; Pospischil, A.; Bhuiyan, M.; Jiang, H.; Tian, H.; Farmer, D.; Deng, B.; Li, C.; Han, S.J.; Wang, H.; et al. Black Phosphorus Mid-Infrared Photodetectors with High Gain. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 4648–4655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Wu, S.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Jiao, H.; Zhao, Q.; Huang, X.; Tai, X.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, H.; Wang, X. Ultra-sensitive polarization-resolved black phosphorus homojunction photodetector defined by ferroelectric domains. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Ran, W.; Ren, Z.; Wang, P.; Yan, Y.; Zhao, K.; Li, L.; Li, Z.; Wang, L.; Yang, J.; Wei, Z. Integrated polarization-sensitive amplification system for digital information transmission. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Li, Y.T.; Ding, L.; Li, J.Z.; Kang, J.; Li, D.H.; Ren, L.; Ju, Z.Y.; Sun, M.X.; Ma, J.Q.; Tian, Y.; et al. Light-Enhanced Ion Migration in Two-Dimensional Perovskite Single Crystals Revealed in Carbon Nanotubes/Two-Dimensional Perovskite Heterostructure and Its Photomemory Application. ACS Cent. Sci. 2019, 5, 1857–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Marcus, M.S.; Simmons, J.; Castellini, O.; Hamers, R.; Eriksson, M. Photogating carbon nanotube transistors. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 100, 084306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Brady, G.J.; Way, A.J.; Safron, N.S.; Evensen, H.T.; Gopalan, P.; Arnold, M.S. Quasi-ballistic carbon nanotube array transistors with current density exceeding Si and GaAs. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1601240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Yang, B.; Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J.; Jiao, H.; Hao, D.; Guo, P.; Zeng, S.; Hua, Z.; et al. High Performance Ternary Organic Phototransistors with Photoresponse up to 2600 nm at Room Temperature. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2103787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Li, F.; Chen, Y.; Ma, C.; Buttner, U.; Leo, K.; Wu, T. High-Performance Near-Infrared Phototransistor Based on n-Type Small-Molecular Organic Semiconductor. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2017, 3, 1600430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Lin, J.; Wang, Z.; Lin, X.; Wei, X.; Zheng, W.; Hu, Q. Amorphous-AlZnN/graphene heterostructure for solar-blind ultraviolet photovoltaic detectors. Ceram. Int. 2022, 49, 4177–4183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Razeghi, M. Short-wavelength solar-blind detectors-status, prospects, and markets. Proc. IEEE 2002, 90, 1006–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Lu, J.; Lv, Z.; Qiu, X.; Lai, S.; Jiang, H. Ultrasensitive and high-speed AlGaN/AlN solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector: A full-channel-self-depleted phototransistor by a virtual photogate. Photonics Res. 2022, 10, 2229–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Limousin, O. New trends in CdTe and CdZnTe detectors for X-and gamma-ray applications. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. 2003, 504, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Carcelén, V.; Hidalgo, P.; Rodríguez-Fernández, J.; Dieguez, E. Growth of Bi doped cadmium zinc telluride single crystals by Bridgman oscillation method and its structural, optical, and electrical analyses. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 107, 093501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Shkir, M.; Khan, M.T.; Ashraf, I.; Almohammedi, A.; Dieguez, E.; AlFaify, S. High-performance visible light photodetectors based on inorganic CZT and InCZT single crystals. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 12436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Tian, X.; Yao, J.; Zhang, L.; Han, B.; Shi, J.; Su, J.; Liu, J.; Li, C.; Liu, X.; Zhai, T. Few-layered organic single-crystalline heterojunctions for high-performance phototransistors. Nano Res. 2022, 15, 2667–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Huang, J.; Lee, J.; Vollbrecht, J.; Brus, V.V.; Dixon, A.L.; Cao, D.X.; Zhu, Z.; Du, Z.; Wang, H.; Cho, K. A High-Performance Solution-Processed Organic Photodetector for Near-Infrared Sensing. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1906027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Ren, H.; Chen, J.-D.; Li, Y.-Q.; Tang, J.-X. Recent Progress in Organic Photodetectors and their Applications. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2002418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Chen, Y.; Wu, X.; Chu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, B.; Huang, J. Hybrid field-effect transistors and photodetectors based on organic semiconductor and CsPbI3 perovskite nanorods bilayer structure. Nano-Micro Lett. 2018, 10, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Dong, Y.; Sun, Y.; Liu, J.; Shi, X.; Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, C.; Yi, Y.; Mo, S.; Fan, L.; et al. Thermally Stable Organic Field-Effect Transistors Based on Asymmetric BTBT Derivatives for High Performance Solar-Blind Photodetectors. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2106085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Tang, X.; Zu, Z.; Shao, H.; Hu, W.; Zhou, M.; Deng, M.; Chen, W.; Zang, Z.; Zhu, T.; Xue, J. All-inorganic perovskite CsPb(Br/I)3 nanorods for optoelectronic application. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 15158–15161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Guo, Z.; Zhao, S.; Liu, A.; Kamata, Y.; Teo, S.; Yang, S.; Xu, Z.; Hayase, S.; Ma, T. Niobium incorporation into CsPbI2Br for stable and efficient all-inorganic perovskite solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 19994–20003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Ouedraogo, N.A.N.; Chen, Y.; Xiao, Y.Y.; Meng, Q.; Han, C.B.; Yan, H.; Zhang, Y. Stability of all-inorganic perovskite solar cells. Nano Energy 2020, 67, 104249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Li, L.; Fang, Y.; Yang, D. Interlayer-Assisted Growth of Si-Based All-Inorganic Perovskite Films via Chemical Vapor Deposition for Sensitive and Stable X-ray Detection. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2022, 13, 5441–5450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Zhao, B.; Gan, Z.; Johnson, M.; Najafidehaghani, E.; Rejek, T.; George, A.; Fink, R.H.; Turchanin, A.; Halik, M. 2D van der Waals Heterojunction of Organic and Inorganic Monolayers for High Responsivity Phototransistors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2105444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Guan, X.; Wang, Z.; Hota, M.K.; Alshareef, H.N.; Wu, T. P-Type SnO Thin Film Phototransistor with Perovskite-Mediated Photogating. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2019, 5, 1800538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Kan, H.; Zheng, W.; Lin, R.; Li, M.; Fu, C.; Sun, H.; Dong, M.; Xu, C.; Luo, J.; Fu, Y. Ultrafast photovoltaic-type deep ultraviolet photodetectors using hybrid zero-/two-dimensional heterojunctions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 8412–8418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Hu, H.; Wu, C.; He, C.; Shen, J.; Cheng, Y.; Wu, F.; Wang, S.; Guo, D. Improved Photoelectric Performance with Self-Powered Characteristics through TiO2 Surface Passivation in an α-Ga2O3 Nanorod Array Deep Ultraviolet Photodetector. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2022, 4, 3801–3806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Ahn, J.; Ma, J.; Lee, D.; Lin, Q.; Park, Y.; Lee, O.; Sim, S.; Lee, K.; Yoo, G.; Heo, J. Ultrahigh Deep-Ultraviolet Responsivity of a β-Ga2O3/MgO Heterostructure-Based Phototransistor. ACS Photonics 2021, 8, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Goossens, S.; Navickaite, G.; Monasterio, C.; Gupta, S.; Piqueras, J.J.; Pérez, R.; Burwell, G.; Nikitskiy, I.; Lasanta, T.; Galán, T. Broadband image sensor array based on graphene–CMOS integration. Nat. Photonics 2017, 11, 366–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Fang, L.; Dai, S.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, D.; Huang, J. Light-stimulated artificial synapses based on 2D organic field-effect transistors. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2020, 6, 1901217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Shao, L.; Wang, H.; Yang, Y.; He, Y.; Tang, Y.; Fang, H.; Zhao, J.; Xiao, H.; Liang, K.; Wei, M. Optoelectronic properties of printed photogating carbon nanotube thin film transistors and their application for light-stimulated neuromorphic devices. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 12161–12169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Trung, T.Q.; Dang, V.Q.; Lee, H.-B.; Kim, D.-I.; Moon, S.; Lee, N.-E.; Lee, H. An omnidirectionally stretchable photodetector based on organic–inorganic heterojunctions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 35958–35967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Zhang, L.; Tian, X.; Yao, J.; Song, X.; Yang, S.; Guo, S.; Wang, Y.; Li, B.; Ren, X.; Sun, Y.; et al. Few-layered two-dimensional molecular crystals for organic artificial visual memories with record-high photoresponse. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 8834–8841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Mitra, S.; Kakkar, S.; Ahmed, T.; Ghosh, A. Graphene-WS2 van der Waals Hybrid Heterostructure for Photodetector and Memory Device Applications. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2020, 14, 064029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Liu, C.; Zou, X.; Wu, M.C.; Wang, Y.; Lv, Y.; Duan, X.; Zhang, S.; Liu, X.; Wu, W.W.; Hu, W. Polarization-Resolved Broadband MoS2/Black Phosphorus/MoS2 Optoelectronic Memory with Ultralong Retention Time and Ultrahigh Switching Ratio. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2100781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Zhu, Q.B.; Li, B.; Yang, D.D.; Liu, C.; Feng, S.; Chen, M.L.; Sun, Y.; Tian, Y.N.; Su, X.; Wang, X.M.; et al. A flexible ultrasensitive optoelectronic sensor array for neuromorphic vision systems. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Ji, R.; Feng, G.; Jiang, C.; Tian, B.; Luo, C.; Lin, H.; Tang, X.; Peng, H.; Duan, C.G. Fully Light-Modulated Organic Artificial Synapse with the Assistance of Ferroelectric Polarization. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2022, 8, 2101402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Carroli, M.; Dixon, A.G.; Herder, M.; Pavlica, E.; Hecht, S.; Bratina, G.; Orgiu, E.; Samorì, P. Multiresponsive nonvolatile memories based on optically switchable ferroelectric organic field-effect transistors. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2007965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Wu, X.; Lan, S.; Hu, D.; Chen, Q.; Li, E.; Yan, Y.; Chen, H.; Guo, T. High performance flexible multilevel optical memory based on a vertical organic field effect transistor with ultrashort channel length. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 9229–9240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Jeong, Y.J.; Yun, D.-J.; Kim, S.H.; Jang, J.; Park, C.E. Photoinduced recovery of organic transistor memories with photoactive floating-gate interlayers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 11759–11769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Kim, D.I.; Kwon, N.Y.; Lee, S.-H.; Cho, M.J.; Kim, J.; Choi, D.H.; Joo, J. High hysteresis and distinctive optoelectronic memory effect for ambipolar thin-film transistors using a conjugated polymer having donor–acceptor heterojunction. Org. Electron. 2022, 108, 106599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Graphene-based photodetector. (a) Graphene–CdS heterostructure schematic. (b) The IPh changes as the area of CdS covering graphene increased from 25% to 75%. (c) Schematic band diagram of a graphene–CdS heterostructure under light irradiation in Vbias = 0. (d) VG–ID curve of a graphene-based photodetector using an InSb substrate under dark conditions. The lowest ID was obtained at a VG of approximately 7.7 V. (e) Schematic diagram of a graphene–MoTe2 heterostructure. Schematic band diagram of a graphene–MoTe2 heterostructure at (f) a low intensity of light and (g) a high intensity of light. (h) IPh (ILaser–IDark) at various laser powers as a function of time. (ac) Reproduced with permission from [80]. Copyright Elsevier, 2022. (d) Reproduced with permission from [83]. Copyright AIP Publishing, 2018. (eh) Reproduced with permission from [84]. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2020.
Figure 1. Graphene-based photodetector. (a) Graphene–CdS heterostructure schematic. (b) The IPh changes as the area of CdS covering graphene increased from 25% to 75%. (c) Schematic band diagram of a graphene–CdS heterostructure under light irradiation in Vbias = 0. (d) VG–ID curve of a graphene-based photodetector using an InSb substrate under dark conditions. The lowest ID was obtained at a VG of approximately 7.7 V. (e) Schematic diagram of a graphene–MoTe2 heterostructure. Schematic band diagram of a graphene–MoTe2 heterostructure at (f) a low intensity of light and (g) a high intensity of light. (h) IPh (ILaser–IDark) at various laser powers as a function of time. (ac) Reproduced with permission from [80]. Copyright Elsevier, 2022. (d) Reproduced with permission from [83]. Copyright AIP Publishing, 2018. (eh) Reproduced with permission from [84]. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2020.
Nanomaterials 13 00882 g001
Figure 2. TMD-based photodetector. (a) Time evolution of the ID under white LED light illumination (11 nW) when surface treated with O3 to form a WOx (x < 3) layer on WSe2. (b) Transfer curve of the PtSe2 photodetector according to the light intensity with a 405 nm laser irradiation. (c) Transfer curve of the PtSe2 photodetector with (red curve) and without (dark curve) light irradiation. (d) Schematic diagram of the perovskite/BP/MoS2 photodiode. (e) Time evolution of the ID (VD = 0) with different wavelengths of 457, 532, 660, and 808 nm. The inset shows the corresponding R. (f) Schematic band diagram and photocarrier transfer of the device under laser illumination. (g) Scheme of the BP photodetector. (h) Upper panel: gate-dependent IPh measured according to the various intensities of 532 nm light. Lower panel: transfer curve corresponding to the upper panel for reference at VD = 200 mV. (i) Schematics of the energy band for the state II (VG ≈ VTh) of (h). The down arrows denote the carrier trapping process. The black dots and open circles represent electrons and holes, respectively. (a) Reproduced with permission from [91]. Copyright AIP Publishing, 2018. (b,c) Reproduced with permission from [94]. Copyright AIP Publishing, 2021. (df) Reproduced with permission from [88]. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2019. (gi) Reproduced with permission from [103]. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2016.
Figure 2. TMD-based photodetector. (a) Time evolution of the ID under white LED light illumination (11 nW) when surface treated with O3 to form a WOx (x < 3) layer on WSe2. (b) Transfer curve of the PtSe2 photodetector according to the light intensity with a 405 nm laser irradiation. (c) Transfer curve of the PtSe2 photodetector with (red curve) and without (dark curve) light irradiation. (d) Schematic diagram of the perovskite/BP/MoS2 photodiode. (e) Time evolution of the ID (VD = 0) with different wavelengths of 457, 532, 660, and 808 nm. The inset shows the corresponding R. (f) Schematic band diagram and photocarrier transfer of the device under laser illumination. (g) Scheme of the BP photodetector. (h) Upper panel: gate-dependent IPh measured according to the various intensities of 532 nm light. Lower panel: transfer curve corresponding to the upper panel for reference at VD = 200 mV. (i) Schematics of the energy band for the state II (VG ≈ VTh) of (h). The down arrows denote the carrier trapping process. The black dots and open circles represent electrons and holes, respectively. (a) Reproduced with permission from [91]. Copyright AIP Publishing, 2018. (b,c) Reproduced with permission from [94]. Copyright AIP Publishing, 2021. (df) Reproduced with permission from [88]. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2019. (gi) Reproduced with permission from [103]. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2016.
Nanomaterials 13 00882 g002
Figure 3. CNT-based photodetector. (a) Scheme of a perovskite/CNTs heterojunction transistor. (b) ID as a function of temperature under various intensities of light at a fixed VG of −30 V. (c) Ion migration barrier of perovskite with and without light illumination. (d) Schematic diagram of in-plane charge migration in lateral direction of perovskite under an electric field. (e) ID as a function of time with different VG showing application as photo-memory. (f) IPh of the device irradiating ultra-weak intensities of 100, 160, 550, and 910 nW·cm−2 light, respectively. (g) Band diagram of the donor, acceptor, D/A complex, and SWCNTs film, and the scheme of charge transfer under infrared light. Inset: schematic diagram of the device. (ae) Reproduced with permission from [106]. Copyright Springer Nature, 2019. (f,g) Reproduced with permission from [109]. Copyright Wiley, 2021.
Figure 3. CNT-based photodetector. (a) Scheme of a perovskite/CNTs heterojunction transistor. (b) ID as a function of temperature under various intensities of light at a fixed VG of −30 V. (c) Ion migration barrier of perovskite with and without light illumination. (d) Schematic diagram of in-plane charge migration in lateral direction of perovskite under an electric field. (e) ID as a function of time with different VG showing application as photo-memory. (f) IPh of the device irradiating ultra-weak intensities of 100, 160, 550, and 910 nW·cm−2 light, respectively. (g) Band diagram of the donor, acceptor, D/A complex, and SWCNTs film, and the scheme of charge transfer under infrared light. Inset: schematic diagram of the device. (ae) Reproduced with permission from [106]. Copyright Springer Nature, 2019. (f,g) Reproduced with permission from [109]. Copyright Wiley, 2021.
Nanomaterials 13 00882 g003
Figure 4. Inorganic compound-based photodetector. (a) Schematic diagram of an Al0.5Ga0.5N∕AlN solar-blind UV photodetector and its neutral conductive path under DUV irradiation. (b) Schematic diagram of the energy band under dark and illumination conditions. (c) Measured and fitted photocurrent of a CZT- and InCZT-based device under different intensities of light irradiation. (d) Schematic of the band diagram of the device under light illumination. (a,b) Reproduced with permission from [113]. Copyright Chinese Laser Press, 2022. (c,d) Reproduced with permission from [116]. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2019.
Figure 4. Inorganic compound-based photodetector. (a) Schematic diagram of an Al0.5Ga0.5N∕AlN solar-blind UV photodetector and its neutral conductive path under DUV irradiation. (b) Schematic diagram of the energy band under dark and illumination conditions. (c) Measured and fitted photocurrent of a CZT- and InCZT-based device under different intensities of light irradiation. (d) Schematic of the band diagram of the device under light illumination. (a,b) Reproduced with permission from [113]. Copyright Chinese Laser Press, 2022. (c,d) Reproduced with permission from [116]. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2019.
Nanomaterials 13 00882 g004
Figure 5. Organic-based photodetector. (a) Schematic illustration of the HL-OPT. (b) Energy band diagram of the HL-OPT device under UV illumination. (c) Transfer characteristics of the flexible HL-OPT with various bending radii with and without UV light. (d) Schematic illustration of the C8BTBT/CsPbI3 nanorod-based phototransistor. (e) Schematic diagram of a photogenerated carrier flow in the hybrid phototransistor under light irradiation. (f) VTh shift of the hybrid phototransistor as a function of light intensity. (g) Scheme of the 1L-MoS2/BTBT-SAM heterostructure device. (h) Energy band diagram of the 1L-MoS2 and BTBT-SAM under light irradiation. (ac) Reproduced with permission from [16]. Copyright Wiley, 2019. (df) Reproduced with permission from [120]. Copyright Springer, 2018. (g,h) Reproduced with permission from [126]. Copyright Wiley, 2021.
Figure 5. Organic-based photodetector. (a) Schematic illustration of the HL-OPT. (b) Energy band diagram of the HL-OPT device under UV illumination. (c) Transfer characteristics of the flexible HL-OPT with various bending radii with and without UV light. (d) Schematic illustration of the C8BTBT/CsPbI3 nanorod-based phototransistor. (e) Schematic diagram of a photogenerated carrier flow in the hybrid phototransistor under light irradiation. (f) VTh shift of the hybrid phototransistor as a function of light intensity. (g) Scheme of the 1L-MoS2/BTBT-SAM heterostructure device. (h) Energy band diagram of the 1L-MoS2 and BTBT-SAM under light irradiation. (ac) Reproduced with permission from [16]. Copyright Wiley, 2019. (df) Reproduced with permission from [120]. Copyright Springer, 2018. (g,h) Reproduced with permission from [126]. Copyright Wiley, 2021.
Nanomaterials 13 00882 g005
Figure 6. Oxide-based photodetector. (a) Plots of IPh and R as a function of VG at the light intensity. (b) Transfer curves of the phototransistor with different wavelengths of light illumination. (c) Schematic diagram of the SnO phototransistor. (d) Schematic diagram of the charge transport mechanism in the SnO/perovskite interface under light irradiation, corresponding to the upper panel of Figure 5e. (e) Magnified transfer characteristics of the perovskite/SnO phototransistor at specific VG. Transfer characteristics of the (f) β-Ga2O3 and (g) β-Ga2O3/MgO heterostructure-based phototransistors. A light-induced hump appeared in the β-Ga2O3 phototransistor when the VG was lower than VTh. (h) Schematic energy band and carrier transport at the β-Ga2O3/MgO device when the VG was less than VTh. (ae) Reproduced with permission from [127]. Copyright Wiley, 2019. (fh) Reproduced with permission from [130]. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2021.
Figure 6. Oxide-based photodetector. (a) Plots of IPh and R as a function of VG at the light intensity. (b) Transfer curves of the phototransistor with different wavelengths of light illumination. (c) Schematic diagram of the SnO phototransistor. (d) Schematic diagram of the charge transport mechanism in the SnO/perovskite interface under light irradiation, corresponding to the upper panel of Figure 5e. (e) Magnified transfer characteristics of the perovskite/SnO phototransistor at specific VG. Transfer characteristics of the (f) β-Ga2O3 and (g) β-Ga2O3/MgO heterostructure-based phototransistors. A light-induced hump appeared in the β-Ga2O3 phototransistor when the VG was lower than VTh. (h) Schematic energy band and carrier transport at the β-Ga2O3/MgO device when the VG was less than VTh. (ae) Reproduced with permission from [127]. Copyright Wiley, 2019. (fh) Reproduced with permission from [130]. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2021.
Nanomaterials 13 00882 g006
Figure 7. Image sensor and neuromorphic device utilizing the photogating effect. (a) Schematic diagram of the phototransistor with a CNT/CsPbBr3-QD channel. (b) Energy band diagram at the dark (upper panel) and illumination states (lower panel). (c) PPF index decreased continuously as a reverse function of the pulse interval. Inset: PPF results from two consecutively applied light pulses. (d) Human face learning simulation results with the sensor array in the initial state and after training processes by applying 0, 10, 20, 50, 100, and 200 light pulses (1 μW·cm2). (e) Band diagram scheme of the device when P(VDF-TrFE) is downward polarized. (f) Band diagram scheme of the device when 445 nm of light is irradiated. (g) Three successive cycles of potentiation and depression curves by irradiating 660 and 445 nm light pulses, respectively. (h) Current changes according to the 28 μW·cm−2, 94.4 μW·cm−2, and 167.8 μW·cm−2 of light pulse intensities: simulating pain formation and suppression processes of nociceptors according to 25, 15, and 5 °C of water temperature. (ad) Reproduced with permission from [138]. Copyright Springer Nature, 2021. (eh) Reproduced with permission from [139]. Copyright Wiley, 2022.
Figure 7. Image sensor and neuromorphic device utilizing the photogating effect. (a) Schematic diagram of the phototransistor with a CNT/CsPbBr3-QD channel. (b) Energy band diagram at the dark (upper panel) and illumination states (lower panel). (c) PPF index decreased continuously as a reverse function of the pulse interval. Inset: PPF results from two consecutively applied light pulses. (d) Human face learning simulation results with the sensor array in the initial state and after training processes by applying 0, 10, 20, 50, 100, and 200 light pulses (1 μW·cm2). (e) Band diagram scheme of the device when P(VDF-TrFE) is downward polarized. (f) Band diagram scheme of the device when 445 nm of light is irradiated. (g) Three successive cycles of potentiation and depression curves by irradiating 660 and 445 nm light pulses, respectively. (h) Current changes according to the 28 μW·cm−2, 94.4 μW·cm−2, and 167.8 μW·cm−2 of light pulse intensities: simulating pain formation and suppression processes of nociceptors according to 25, 15, and 5 °C of water temperature. (ad) Reproduced with permission from [138]. Copyright Springer Nature, 2021. (eh) Reproduced with permission from [139]. Copyright Wiley, 2022.
Nanomaterials 13 00882 g007
Figure 8. Optoelectronic memory device using the photogating effect. (a) Schematic diagram of the P(BDBT-co-N2200)-based phototransistor structure. Schematic diagrams of the energy band and charge transport of the optoelectronic memory in (b) writing, (c) reading, and (d) erasing processes; the red box and dotted line represent the energy band and trap states of N2200, respectively; the blue box and dotted line represent the energy band and trap states of PBDB-T, respectively. (e) Sequence process of writing (W), reading (R), and erasing (E) operations for P(BDBT-co-N2200)-based optoelectronic memory. (ae) Reproduced with permission from [143]. Copyright Elsevier, 2022.
Figure 8. Optoelectronic memory device using the photogating effect. (a) Schematic diagram of the P(BDBT-co-N2200)-based phototransistor structure. Schematic diagrams of the energy band and charge transport of the optoelectronic memory in (b) writing, (c) reading, and (d) erasing processes; the red box and dotted line represent the energy band and trap states of N2200, respectively; the blue box and dotted line represent the energy band and trap states of PBDB-T, respectively. (e) Sequence process of writing (W), reading (R), and erasing (E) operations for P(BDBT-co-N2200)-based optoelectronic memory. (ae) Reproduced with permission from [143]. Copyright Elsevier, 2022.
Nanomaterials 13 00882 g008
Table 1. Summary of several physical quantities in photodetector.
Table 1. Summary of several physical quantities in photodetector.
ParameterExplanationFormulaUnit
Photocurrent
(Iph)
A current when light is irradiated; a clear signal detection is determined by a high photocurrent value.NAA
Responsivity
(R)
A sensitivity of the device according to the intensity of light illumination. I p h I d P o p t A A·W−1
Noise equivalent power
(NEP)
The weakest light signals a device can detect; the smaller the NEP, the better the performance of the detector. g n R W·Hz−1/2
Specific detectivity
(D*)
Inversion of the NEP, which indicates the relative noise level present in the device. A Δ f N E P Jones
External quantum efficiency
(EQE)
The efficiency of the converted charge carrier flux to the incident photon flux. R h ν e Unitless
Response time (τ)The time that it takes for the photodetector to change the output as the input light intensity changes. 1 2 π f T s
Table 2. Various active channel materials for the photodetection performances.
Table 2. Various active channel materials for the photodetection performances.
Channel MaterialTypeWavelengthRmax
[A·W−1]
D*
[Jones]
StructureMechanism/
Feature
ApplicationRef.
Graphenep532–980 nm0.26
(635 nm)
NAHetero
Asymmetric
Conductivity
modulation
NA[80]
Ambipolar4.6 μm33.8
(81.6 μW·cm−2)
NABareSubstrate changeNA[83]
p975 nm20
(50 nW)
NAHeteroConductivity
modulation
NA[84]
TMDWSe2pwhite light LED3.6 × 103
(1.1 nW)
NABareDefect
engineering
NA[91]
PtSe2Ambipolar405 nm5 × 104
(0.13 μW·cm−2)
3 × 107BareVacancy
engineering
NA[94]
MoS2p457–808 nm11
(0.02 μW·cm−2)
1.3 × 1012HeteroEnergy band/
Defect
engineering
NA[88]
BPp532 nm–
3.39 μm
82
(3.39 μm)
NABarePolarization/
Energy band
engineering
NA[103]
CNTp400–2600 nm2.75 × 106
(2000 nm)
3.12 × 1014
(2000 nm)
D/A heteroDefect
engineering
Blackbody
radiation
measurement
Flexible
Neuromorphic device
[109]
p470 nmN/AN/AHeteroPotential
redistribution
Optoelectronic memory[106]
Inorganic
compound
n-Al0.5Ga0.5Nn213–280 nm1.6 × 105
(240 nm)
1.52 × 1018BarePolarization/
Potential
redistribution
NA[113]
InCZTp632.8 nm0.50 (0.049 mW·cm−2)1.80 × 1011BareDefect
engineering
NA[116]
OrganicC8-BTBTp352–700 nm8.6 × 103
(365 nm)
3.4 × 1014D/A heteroInterlayer
insertion
Flexible[16]
C8-BTBTpWhite light4.3 × 103NAHeteroEnergy band
engineering
NA[120]
BTBT-SAMp406 nm475NAHeteroMaterial
treatment
NA[126]
OxideSnOp365–655 nm1.83 × 103
(655 nm)
2.11 × 1013HeteroEnergy band
engineering
NA[127]
β-Ga2O3n260 nm2.3 × 107
(0.51 μW·cm−2)
1.7 × 1015HeteroDefect
engineering
NA[130]
CNTp405 nm and 516 nm5.1 × 107
(0.01 μW·cm−2)
2 × 1016HeteroPotential
redistribution
Optoelectronic sensor
Flexible
[138]
Inorganic
compound
CuPcp445 nm and 660 nmNANAHeteroPolarization/
Potential
redistribution
Neuromorphic device[139]
CopolymerP(BDBT-co-N2200)Ambipolar505 nm,
627 nm,
and 735 nm
NANAD/A heteroDefect
engineering
Optoelectronic memory[143]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shin, J.; Yoo, H. Photogating Effect-Driven Photodetectors and Their Emerging Applications. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 882. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13050882

AMA Style

Shin J, Yoo H. Photogating Effect-Driven Photodetectors and Their Emerging Applications. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(5):882. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13050882

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shin, Jihyun, and Hocheon Yoo. 2023. "Photogating Effect-Driven Photodetectors and Their Emerging Applications" Nanomaterials 13, no. 5: 882. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13050882

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop