Next Article in Journal
Data-Driven and Machine Learning to Screen Metal–Organic Frameworks for the Efficient Separation of Methane
Next Article in Special Issue
Atomic Fabrication of 2D Materials Using Electron Beams Inside an Electron Microscope
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of Direct Electron Transfer of Glucose Oxidase on a Graphene-CNT Composite Surface: A Molecular Dynamics Study Based on Electrochemical Experiments
Previous Article in Special Issue
Defects and Defect Engineering of Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenide (2D TMDC) Materials
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Contact Properties of Monolayer and Multilayer MoS2-Metal van der Waals Interfaces

by
Xin Pei
1,
Xiaohui Hu
1,2,*,
Tao Xu
3 and
Litao Sun
3
1
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
2
Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Inorganic Function Composites, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
3
SEU-FEI Nano-Pico Center, Key Laboratory of MEMS of Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2024, 14(13), 1075; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14131075
Submission received: 16 May 2024 / Revised: 17 June 2024 / Accepted: 21 June 2024 / Published: 24 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structure, Properties and Device Applications of 2D Nanomaterials)

Abstract

The contact resistance formed between MoS2 and metal electrodes plays a key role in MoS2-based electronic devices. The Schottky barrier height (SBH) is a crucial parameter for determining the contact resistance. However, the SBH is difficult to modulate because of the strong Fermi-level pinning (FLP) at MoS2-metal interfaces. Here, we investigate the FLP effect and the contact types of monolayer and multilayer MoS2-metal van der Waals (vdW) interfaces using density functional theory (DFT) calculations based on Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) level. It has been demonstrated that, compared with monolayer MoS2-metal close interfaces, the FLP effect can be significantly reduced in monolayer MoS2-metal vdW interfaces. Furthermore, as the layer number of MoS2 increases from 1L to 4L, the FLP effect is first weakened and then increased, which can be attributed to the charge redistribution at the MoS2-metal and MoS2-MoS2 interfaces. In addition, the p-type Schottky contact can be achieved in 1L–4L MoS2-Pt, 3L MoS2-Au, and 2L–3L MoS2-Pd vdW interfaces, which is useful for realizing complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) logic circuits. These findings indicated that the FLP and contact types can be effectively modulated at MoS2-metal vdW interfaces by selecting the layer number of MoS2.
Keywords: two-dimensional materials; transition metal dichalcogenides; electrical properties; Schottky barrier; density functional theory two-dimensional materials; transition metal dichalcogenides; electrical properties; Schottky barrier; density functional theory

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pei, X.; Hu, X.; Xu, T.; Sun, L. The Contact Properties of Monolayer and Multilayer MoS2-Metal van der Waals Interfaces. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 1075. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14131075

AMA Style

Pei X, Hu X, Xu T, Sun L. The Contact Properties of Monolayer and Multilayer MoS2-Metal van der Waals Interfaces. Nanomaterials. 2024; 14(13):1075. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14131075

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pei, Xin, Xiaohui Hu, Tao Xu, and Litao Sun. 2024. "The Contact Properties of Monolayer and Multilayer MoS2-Metal van der Waals Interfaces" Nanomaterials 14, no. 13: 1075. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14131075

APA Style

Pei, X., Hu, X., Xu, T., & Sun, L. (2024). The Contact Properties of Monolayer and Multilayer MoS2-Metal van der Waals Interfaces. Nanomaterials, 14(13), 1075. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14131075

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop