Next Article in Journal
Rare Earth Material for Hydrogen Gas Sensing: PtGd Alloy Thin Films as a Promising Frontier
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of LiNiCoMnO2 Cathode Material Synthesis Using Polyvinyl Alcohol Solution Method for Improved Lithium-Ion Batteries
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Electrospray Deposition Conditions of ZnO Thin Films for Ammonia Sensing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bimetallic PtAu-Decorated SnO2 Nanospheres Exhibiting Enhanced Gas Sensitivity for Ppb-Level Acetone Detection

1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
2
Institute for Smart Ageing, Beijing Academy of Science and Technology, Beijing 100089, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2024, 14(13), 1097; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14131097
Submission received: 29 May 2024 / Revised: 18 June 2024 / Accepted: 24 June 2024 / Published: 26 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanoscale Material-Based Gas Sensors)

Abstract

:
Acetone is a biomarker found in the expired air of patients suffering from diabetes. Therefore, early and accurate detection of its concentration in the breath of such patients is extremely important. We prepared Tin(IV) oxide (SnO2) nanospheres via hydrothermal treatment and then decorated them with bimetallic PtAu nanoparticles (NPs) employing the approach of in situ reduction. The topology, elemental composition, as well as crystal structure of the prepared materials were studied via field emission scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction. The findings revealed that bimetallic PtAu-decorated SnO2 nanospheres (PtAu/SnO2) were effectively synthesized as well as PtAu NPs evenly deposited onto the surface of the SnO2 nanospheres. Pure SnO2 nanospheres and PtAu/SnO2 sensors were prepared, and their acetone gas sensitivity was explored. The findings demonstrated that in comparison to pristine SnO2 nanosphere sensors, the sensors based on PtAu/SnO2 displayed superior sensitivity to acetone of 0.166–100 ppm at 300 °C, providing a low theoretical limit of detection equal to 158 ppm. Moreover, the PtAu/SnO2 sensors showed excellent gas response (Ra/Rg = 492.3 to 100 ppm), along with fast response and recovery (14 s/13 s to 10 ppm), good linearity of correlation, excellent repeatability, long-term stability, and satisfactory selectivity at 300 °C. This improved gas sensitivity was because of the electron sensitization of the Pt NPs, the chemical sensitization of the Au NPs, as well as the synergistic effects of bimetallic PtAu. The PtAu/SnO2 sensors have considerable potential for the early diagnosis and screening of diabetes.

1. Introduction

Early diagnosis and screening of chronic diseases are important factors for improving cure rates. Concentration changes of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in human exhalation are closely linked to certain diseases, and analyzing these VOCs is a non-invasive and convenient method [1]. Among different gas biomarkers, acetone is the key factor reflecting the progress of diabetes and/or therapeutic effect, and its concentration can be used as the basis to diagnose diabetes [2]. Therefore, the rapid and effective detection of acetone is highly desirable. According to clinical analyses, the level of acetone exhaled by healthy people is 300–900 ppb, whereas its level exhaled by diabetic patients exceeds 1.8 ppm [3,4]. Faced with extremely low target gas (TG) concentrations and complex background environments, stricter requirements are required to construct high-performance gas sensors, enabling the recognition of acetone in breath at ppb levels with improved selectivity. Chemiresistive-gas-sensor-based non-invasive respiratory diagnoses have become a promising technique for portable disease screening compared to other respiratory component detection technologies due to their superior sensitivity, good material designability, low cost, compact size, easy integration into sensor arrays, and low power consumption [5,6].
Gas sensors employing metal oxide semiconductors (MOSs) are more convenient to carry and operate and respond more rapidly compared to traditional methods [7,8]. The core component of gas sensors, the MOS, offers the benefits of low price, strong specificity, and a facile manufacturing process [9]. MOS materials have a considerably broad application prospect in non-invasive and rapid diagnosis fields. Among them, Tin(IV) oxide (SnO2), a common n-type broad bandgap semiconductor (Eg = 3.6 eV at a temperature of 300 K), is extensively employed as a gas sensor material due to its excellent stability as well as improved conductivity [10,11]. However, gas sensors solely relying on SnO2 display drawbacks including poor response, limited selectivity, and excessively high operating temperatures (To) [12]. Therefore, to improve its gas sensitivity, researchers have sought to modify SnO2 using various strategies, including changing the crystal structure and morphology, decorating catalysts, constructing heterostructures, developing charge transfer hybrids, and incorporating molecular probing along with sieving effects [13,14,15,16,17]. Among these strategies, the use of functionalized nanocatalysts involving hybrid nanocomposites with synergistic effects as well as the introduction of significantly active catalysts for gas chemisorption demonstrates remarkably enhanced sensitivity and selective detection ability [13].
Bimetallic nanoparticles (NPs), a type of heterogeneous catalyst, exhibit dual properties related to their parent metal. By introducing guest metals, the activity, durability, and selectivity of the bimetallic NPs can be considerably adjusted and enhanced due to their reported synergistic effects. This unique advantage provides enormous possibilities for high-performance gas sensors. Researchers such as Li et al. [18] demonstrated that bimetallic PdAu functionalization on SnO2 nanosheets achieved the highly sensitive detection of formaldehyde and acetone and exhibited excellent reusability, reliability, and strong resistance to humidity and corresponding biomarkers in the human exhaled air. Zhu et al. [19] prepared PdPt/In2O3 nanospheres featuring various Pt and Pd ratios, achieving prompt hydrogen detection at 400 ppb, as well as improved selectivity, repeatability, and prolonged stability. The enhanced gas sensitization was because of the synergistic effects of Pd and Pt. Luo et al. [20] developed a ZnO hollow nanocube decorated with PdRh, which had a hollow framework rich in Rh and a Pd-rich core frame. The results of the study revealed that it exhibited improved H2S-sensing properties. These enhancements were credited to the outstanding conductivity of its framework, which improved gas diffusion and specific surface area, the excellent catalytic capability of the PdRh bimetal, as well as the establishment of Schottky barrier-type junctions and defects. Feng et al. [21] synthesized AgPt-decorated WO3 NPs that exhibited a significantly enhanced response towards acetone. This was because of the electronic as well as the chemical sensitization of the Pt and Ag NPs to the WO3 NPs that enhanced the adsorption of oxygen and improved the reaction rate, thereby promoting the gas-sensing response. Therefore, the preparation of SnO2 with a unique structure followed by functionalization with bimetallic NPs on the surface emerges as a significant strategy for producing sensing materials characterized by enhanced response levels and rapid response and recovery times, ideal for determining trace-level concentrations of acetone.
This study presents the fabrication of bimetallic PtAu-modified (PtAu/SnO2) SnO2 nanospheres while employing the simple and versatile approaches of hydrothermal [22,23] and in situ reduction. The structure as well as morphology of the SnO2 nanospheres before and after the modification were examined through SEM, TEM, XRD, and XPS. Furthermore, the gas-sensitive-sensing efficiency of the obtained materials was explored by employing acetone as the analyte. The novelty of this study is evident in these two key elements: a simple fabrication approach along with outstanding gas detection efficiency. We prepared SnO2 nanospheres by the hydrothermal method with tin tetrachloride (SnCl4) as the precursor followed by decorating them with PtAu NPs on the SnO2 surface through the in situ reduction of chloroplatinic acid (H2PtCl6) and chloroauric acid (HAuCl4) employing ascorbic acid. The approach is considerably simple as well as efficient and does not introduce any surfactant. PtAu/SnO2 displayed enhanced selectivity, sensitivity, and rapid response and recovery times for acetone gas at the optimal response temperature (300 °C). The enhanced sensitivity was because of the electronic and chemical sensitization, as well as the synergistic effect of bimetallic PtAu. In addition, the ppb-level determination of acetone in breath was important to diagnose diabetes. In conclusion, the mechanism of gas detection in PtAu/SnO2 nanospheres was deliberated.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials and Precursors

SnCl4 (99%), sucrose (99.5%), H2PtCl6 (8 wt.% in H2O), HAuCl4 (98%, Au 47.8%), as well as ascorbic acid (≥99.0%) were supplied by Anhui Zesheng Technology Co., Ltd., Anqing, China. All the reactants employed for the synthesis were of analytical grade and were utilized as provided without any purification. Distilled (DI) water was employed during the entire study.

2.2. Preparation of SnO2 Nanospheres

SnO2 nanospheres were prepared via a straightforward one-step hydrothermal technique followed by calcination treatment. In a typical synthetic strategy, SnO2 nanospheres were fabricated by dissolving 1.5 mmol of SnCl4 in DI water (15 mL) while continuously being stirred, followed by the addition of 3 mmol sucrose. Following that, the prepared solution was moved to a 50 mL stainless steel autoclave lined with Teflon and kept at 180 °C (12 h). The precipitate was then left to cool to room temperature (RT) followed by centrifuging and washing multiple times with ethanol and DI water. Finally, the SnO2 samples underwent drying at a temperature of 80 °C (6 h), followed by calcination in air for 4h at a temperature of 500 °C.

2.3. Synthesis of PtAu/SnO2 Nanospheres

Figure 1 illustrates the synthesis of SnO2 nanospheres decorated with bimetallic PtAu (PtAu/SnO2). PtAu/SnO2 decoration was carried out through the in situ reduction of H2PtCl6 along with HAuCl4 employing ascorbic acid acting as the reduction agent. The fabrication was carried out by dispersing 0.1 g of SnO2 nanospheres in DI water (10 mL) and ultrasound-treated (10 min). Following that, 130 μL HAuCl4 (20 mM) and 230 μL H2PtCl6 (20 mM) were introduced to the obtained mixture. Following a brief interval, 1 mL of ascorbic acid solution with a molarity of 0.1 M was introduced to the mixture followed by stirring (4 h) at RT conditions. At last, the products (PtAu/SnO2) were centrifuged and underwent washing using DI water followed by drying at 60 °C. Similarly, the fabrication of Au/SnO2 and Pt/SnO2 was carried out for comparison employing 130 μL HAuCl4 (20 mM) and 230 μL H2PtCl6 (20 mM), respectively.

2.4. Material Characterization

Powder XRD (D/MAX-2600; Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) was performed through a Cu-Kα radiation source (λ = 1.54056 Å, 150 mA, 40 kV) within the range spanning from 10° to 80°. The prepared samples were studied using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, TESCAN MIRA LMS, TESCAN, Brno, Czech Republic) coupled with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscope at 15 kV, as well as an energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscope. The TEM and the high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images (JEM-F200, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) were acquired through an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. XPS (K-Alpha, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) studies were carried out employing an Al Kα radiation source (1486.6 eV, 50 eV pass energy, 400 μm spot size), and all measured binding energies (BEs) corresponded with the C 1s peak found at 284.6 eV of surface indefinite carbon. Spectra were analyzed using Avantage 5.9931 software (Thermo Scientific). An inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) (Agilent 7800, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was also employed for characterizing the samples. The working parameters of ICP-MS are detailed in Table S1.

2.5. Gas Sensitivity Experiments

The gas sensor was prepared as a side-heated structure. First, the prepared materials underwent grounding with a dispersant (DI water) within an agate mortar to produce a paste. The prepared paste was then applied employing a brush onto a ceramic tube (CT) upon which Pt-conducting wires and a couple of Au electrodes had been previously printed. The modified CT was dried at 180 °C for approximately 24 h to eliminate the DI water followed by welding onto a pedestal. Heating wires made of Ni–Cr were then pushed into the CT. The resulting sensors underwent aging at 300 °C (3 days) to enhance the mechanical strength and stability of the sensitive films.
A WS-30B gas sensor system from ZhengZhou Winsen Technology Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, China. was employed to analyze the overall efficiency of the prepared gas sensor. The optimal temperature was determined by applying different heating voltages. Gas characteristics were assessed employing a stationary state gas distribution approach, wherein a standard gas was introduced inside a sealed chamber (18 L). The response of the gas sensor in this work was characterized using the ratio of the sensor resistance in various gas conditions as S = Ra/Rg; here, Rg and Ra denote the resistances of TG and the sensor in air, respectively. The RT relative humidity (RH) of the air was approximately 20%. The response time was specified as the duration required for the sensor to achieve 90% of the overall resistance change from its primary resistance. Conversely, the recovery time was the reverse. The amount of TG acquired from acetone was calculated using Equation (1) [24]:
V x = V × C × M 22.4 × d × p × 10 9 × 273 + T r 273 + T b
where Vx (μL) is the liquid volume, V (mL) is the testing chamber volume, M (g) denotes the liquid molecular weight, C (ppm) is the liquid–vapor concentration, d (g/cm3) is the liquid specific gravity, Tb (°C) is the test chamber temperature, Tr (°C) is the room temperature, and p is the purity of the liquid.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Material Characterisation

The crystal phases of the pure SnO2 nanospheres and PtAu/SnO2 nanospheres were analyzed by XRD. It is evident from Figure 2 that all the samples displayed intense diffraction signals and displayed Bragg reflections of the SnO2 rutile structure (tetragonal) (110), (101), (200), (111), (210), (211), (220), (002), (310), (112), (301), (202), and (321) planes (JCPDS card no. 41-1445) [25]. No obvious peaks of the metallic NPs (Pt or Au) were found in the PtAu/SnO2 nanospheres sample as the limit of detection was not sufficient for the identifying traces of Au and Pt NPs. On the other hand, the presence of Au and Pt was demonstrated by EDX and XPS (see below). The actual Pt and Au content in the PtAu/SnO2 nanospheres determined by ICP-MS were 1.39 and 0.43 wt%, respectively.
The topologies of the pristine SnO2 nanospheres and PtAu/SnO2 nanospheres were characterized by FE-SEM. As depicted in Figure 3a,b, SnO2 was composed of many accumulative rather than monodispersed nanospheres with diameters of approximately 500 nm. The surface of each individual sphere displayed roughness and comprised densely packed NPs. Elemental analysis by EDX mapping (Figure 3c–f) authenticated the presence of Au, Pt, O, and Sn, traced back to the SnO2 nanospheres, while Au and Pt were attributed to the PtAu NPs. In addition, as shown in Figure 3e,f, Pt and Au, respectively, were uniformly distributed on the SnO2 nanosphere surface.
The microstructure of the functionalized PtAu/SnO2 nanospheres was determined by HRTEM. The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern as well as the typical HRTEM lattice image of the PtAu/SnO2 are shown in Figure 4. The HRTEM micrograph displayed in Figure 4a shows that the SnO2 nanospheres were a single crystal structure with interplanar spacings equal to 0.335 and 0.264 nm, as determined from the lattice fringes that corresponded to the (110) and (101) SnO2 rutile structure planes [11]. Furthermore, the characteristic interplanar 0.235 nm spacings correspond to the PtAu (111) planes, suggesting the particle’s structure comprised multiple crystals of both Au and Pt [25,26]. Additionally, the diffraction rings observed in the SAED patterns displayed in Figure 4b were ascribed to the planar directions of (110), (101), (211), and (111), indicating the tetragonal rutile structure of the SnO2 crystallites and PtAu NPs.
The bonding state and chemical position of the Pt- and Au-loaded SnO2 nanospheres were explored through XPS (Figure 5). The survey spectrums for pristine SnO2 and PtAu/SnO2 are displayed in Figure 5a, confirming the existence of Pt as well as Au in the PtAu/SnO2 nanospheres. The high-resolution (HR) XPS analysis of Sn 3d in the pure SnO2, Pt/SnO2, Au/SnO2, and PtAu/SnO2 samples is presented in Figure 5b. All materials demonstrated two symmetrical signals, with the BE values derived from Sn 3d5/2 and Sn 3d3/2 [11,18]. Compared to pristine SnO2, because of the incorporation of Au and Pt NPs on the nanosphere surface, the Sn 3d band of the Pt/SnO2 and PtAu/SnO2 samples moved towards lower BE values, while the Sn 3d signal of the Au/SnO2 material shifted towards a higher value of BE. The displacement of the Sn 3d signal was because of the interface of SnO2 with the Au as well as Pt NPs, resulting in the change in the electronic structure of the SnO2 surface, thereby enhancing the detecting performance. Figure 5c shows the HR-XPS analysis of O 1s in the pure SnO2, PtAu/SnO2, Au/SnO2, and Pt/SnO2 samples. The O 1s XPS spectrum was resolved into three BE values at 530.45−530.78 eV, 531.12−531.78 eV, and 532.33−532.63 eV, which were associated with lattice oxygen (Olat), defect oxygen (Odef), and adsorbed oxygen (Oads), respectively [10]. It is generally believed that the surface Oads ions would facilitate the adsorption process of gas sensing. It was found that the content of Oads in PtAu/SnO2 was higher than that of pure SnO2, Pt/SnO2, and Au/SnO2, indicating that the loading of PtAu NPs could activate and dissociate O2 in the ambient air and increase the content of Oads, which would participate in the oxidation−reduction reaction, resulting in a larger change in the resistance of PtAu/SnO2. The XPS peaks of Pt 4f were found in the obtained samples of Pt/SnO2 and PtAu/SnO2, as shown in Figure 5d, which were associated with Pt 4f7/2 and Pt 4f5/2. Similarly, the XPS peaks of Au 4f appeared in the obtained samples of Au/SnO2 and PtAu/SnO2, as shown in Figure 5e, which were attributed to Au 4f5/2. Compared to Pt/SnO2 and Au/SnO2, the XPS signals of Pt 4f and Au 4f observed in the PtAu/SnO2 sample both moved towards lower BE values, further indicating the presence of a combined impact because of modification in the electronic structure of the PtAu NPs.

3.2. Gas-Sensing Performance

The gas-detecting efficiencies of the pure SnO2 as well as the PtAu/SnO2 sensors were analyzed and compared. First, the responses of SnO2 along with the PtAu/SnO2 sensors to acetone (100 ppm) gas were tested in a temperature window spanning from 100 °C to 400 °C to optimize the optimal value To for the sensors (see Figure 6a). The trend of the gas sensitivity response for the sensors first increased to the maximum value as the value of To enhanced, and after that declined with further temperature increased (Figure 6a). As the adsorbed molecular oxygen present on the material surface was activated to produce further active O2 and O species, the response increased as the value of To improved. This effect was observed consistently until the optimum To value was reached. Thereafter, the reaction decreased due to the significant desorption of reactants like reactive oxygen species (ROS) as well as the TG molecules. Given its volatility, the steady-state water of the adsorbed acetone molecules slowly decreased as the temperature enhanced, which led to a lower sensor response. Therefore, the optimized value of To was the equilibrium point between two conflicting mechanisms. It is evident from Figure 6a that the optimized value of To for both the SnO2 sensors and PtAu/SnO2 sensors was 300 °C. The introduction of the PtAu NPs led to a reduction in the height of the energy hindrance along with an enhancement in activity at the surface, resulting in the much higher response of the PtAu/SnO2 sensors to acetone (100 ppm) at 300 °C (Ra/Rg = 492.3) in comparison to the pristine SnO2 sensors under the same conditions (Ra/Rg = 23.7). This was associated with the catalytic activity of the Au and Pt NPs, as well as the synergistic effect of the PtAu.
Because the composition of gases exhaled by the human body is complex, it includes a variety of biomarkers. Therefore, the selectivity of the sensor holds importance. The selectivity of the PtAu/SnO2 sensors to 100 ppm ammonia (NH3), acetone (CH3COCH3), ethanol (C2H5OH), methanol (CH3OH), toluene (C7H8), xylene (C8H10), benzene (C6H6), n-ethane (C6H14), and formaldehyde (HCHO) was studied at the optimal To value (300 °C) (Figure 6b). Among them, NH3, C2H5OH, C7H8, as well as HCHO are typical biomarkers: NH3 for kidney disease, C2H5OH for drunk driving, C7H8 for cancer, and HCHO for cardiovascular disease. As demonstrated in Figure 6b, the PtAu/SnO2 sensors exhibited excellent selectivity for detecting acetone, exhibiting a response sensitivity (Ra/Rg) of 492.3, while the response sensitivities (Ra/Rg) for NH3, C2H5OH, CH3OH, C7H8, C8H10, C6H6, C6H14, and HCHO under the same conditions were 0.5, 229.8, 35.2, 3.5, 4.3, 2.1, 3.6, and 17.8, respectively.
Figure 6c shows the dynamic gas-sensitive performance of the PtAu/SnO2 sensors to various concentrations of acetone (0.166–100 ppm) at the optimal To value of 300 °C. The gas responses of the sensors improved as the acetone concentration improved, and the sensors could be employed for acetone determination across a long concentration range. The results also showed that the proposed sensor displayed an excellent linear correlation with the acetone concentration, with a linear correlation of 0.996 (Figure 6d). Even at trace concentrations of acetone gas, the sensor response was much higher than the measurement noise level. When the PtAu/SnO2 sensors were exposed to 166 ppb acetone, the response value Ra/Rg was 3.9. Figure S1 displays the transient response plot of the PtAu/SnO2 sensors to 166 ppb acetone at 300 °C. Using the relationship of detection limit (DL) as given in Equations (S1) and (S2) for the PtAu/SnO2 sensors [10], the DL was 0.158 ppm (158 ppb) (see Supplementary Materials). The actual DL was consistent with the result of the theoretical calculation. This concentration was well below the early diagnosis and monitoring of diabetes breath analysis concentration range: concentrations of acetone in the expired air from patients suffering from diabetes are >1.8 ppm in comparison to 300–900 ppb in the exhaled air from healthy people. Therefore, the PtAu-modified SnO2 sensors are sensitive enough to detect the acetone biomarker associated with diabetes.
The response along with recovery times were characterized by the durations required for the prepared sensor to achieve 90% of its maximum response and recovery, respectively. These are the primary parameters for gas sensors; rapid and efficient response to TG is an essential characteristic of an outstanding sensor device. The response and recovery times of the PtAu/SnO2 sensors to 10 ppm acetone at 300 °C were 14 s and 13 s, respectively (Figure 7a). The sensors revealed an excellent prompt response efficiency. The short time parameter of the PtAu/SnO2 sensors was primarily because of the co-catalysis of PtAu, which accelerated the transfer of charge carriers as well as reduced the response and recovery times.
The repeatability of the PtAu/SnO2 sensors, required for their practical application, was explored. Figure 7b shows the repeatability curve of the PtAu/SnO2 sensors in the presence of acetone (10 ppm) at 300 °C. The sensors underwent evaluation for 20 cycles, and the response values remained nearly consistent in every case, showing no significant variation. They also returned to their initial condition. This demonstrated that the prepared sensors exhibited good recovery and repeatability features. The prolonged stability of the PtAu/SnO2 sensors, a further important aspect of their practical use, was also studied. As depicted in Figure 7c, the response of the developed sensor to acetone (100 ppm) at 300 oC was maintained at the original value after 30 days, and the vibration was small, which implied that the gas sensors exhibited good stability over long durations. The high repeatability along with good stability of the PtAu/SnO2 sensors were associated with the structural stability of the SnO2 nanospheres as well as co-promotion by the PtAu.
Humidity is another important parameter to consider in breath sensing. Figure 7d demonstrates the response curve of the PtAu/SnO2 sensor to acetone (100 ppm) at 300 °C in different RH conditions. The results revealed a declining behavior as RH was enhanced in the range of 20–90%, which was possibly due to the reduced interaction between the PtAu/SnO2 and acetone gas. Due to the enhanced humidity, additional water molecules got adsorbed onto the PtAu/SnO2 surface, which made the chemisorption of oxygen and acetone molecules difficult and prevented the sensing reaction with acetone, thus resulting in decreased sensing performance [27]. When the value of RH reached 90%, the PtAu/SnO2 sensor’s response remained at 336.5 (~68.3% of the response at 20% RH), which indicated that the PtAu/SnO2 sensors could be used for the detection of acetone at higher humidity.
Table 1 summarizes the comparison of the acetone-detecting characteristics of various gas-detecting materials. The proposed PtAu/SnO2 sensors exhibited outstanding acetone gas detecting efficiency. In comparison to published approaches, our newly developed PtAu/SnO2 sensor showed higher response values, quick response/recovery times, and low DL. The current approach offered a significant strategy for enhancing acetone-sensing performance, particularly in improving response magnitude and reducing response/recovery time.

3.3. Gas-Sensing Mechanisms

The sensing mechanism of SnO2, a common n-type semiconductor material, follows the surface resistance control model (Figure 8), whereby the resistance variation of SnO2 corresponds to the content as well as the type of chemisorbed oxygen (O, O2 or O2−) during the processes of desorption and adsorption [Equations (2)–(4)]. Typically, when a SnO2 sensor operates at an appropriate temperature and comes into contact with air, oxygen molecules adsorb onto its surface. These adsorbed molecules capture electrons from the conduction bands (CBs), forming chemically adsorbed oxygen ions and resulting in an enhanced SnO2 resistance [9].
O2(gas) → O2(ads)
O2(ads) + e → O2(ads) (top < 100 °C)
O2(ads) + e → 2O(ads) (100 °C < top < 300 °C)
When the SnO2 sensor encounters a reducing gas, such as acetone, reactive oxygen ions interact with the TG, releasing electrons into the CBs of the SnO2. This leads to a reduction in the resistance value of the SnO2 sensor (Figure S2). In the current report, the surface reaction of the SnO2 sensor is as follows [Equation (5)] [2]:
CH3COCH3(gas) + 8O(ads) → 3CO2(gas) + 3H2O(gas) + 8e
Here, it is evident that the sensor performance depends largely on the content of oxygen ion adsorption. Drawing from the findings of the gas detection characteristics, compared to the simple SnO2 sensor, the addition of PtAu can improve the sensing performance of SnO2 nanospheres for acetone 20.8 times. The catalytic effect of PtAu improves their sensitivity and selectivity to acetone. This catalytic effect comes from either electronic or chemical sensitization as follows [18,35]. First, Au and Pt NPs are recognized as chemical sensitizers with ‘spillover impacts’. Pt and Au are superior oxygen dissociation catalysts compared to SnO2. SnO2 has a high availability for catalyzing the breakdown of molecular oxygen, resulting in the generation of ROS that spill over onto the surface of the metal oxides to produce further ROS. The high concentrations of chemically adsorbed O ions lead to a thicker layer where electrons are scarce, which leads to an increase in baseline resistance value within air. As noted in other literature, a thicker depletion zone enhances sensitivity. Therefore, the interaction between the measured acetone gas and chemically adsorbed O ions leads to a substantial change in the value of the resistance. Furthermore, due to the high conductivity and abundance of free electrons in Pt and Au, the adsorption of O ions occurs onto the surface of metal NPs at reduced temperatures (including RT). This is believed to lead to a larger as well as rapid reaction between the determined gas molecules and the adsorbed O. The homogeneous distribution of small Au and Pt NPs on the SnO2 nanosphere surface maximizes this impact. Second is the synergistic influence of bimetallic Pt/Au NPs. The synergistic effects in the current study can be interpreted by the following two aspects. First, the introduced PtAu NPs lead to changes in the electronic structure of the SnO2 nanospheres at the surface and further activation of the lattice, demonstrated by the shift in the XPS BE band locations. Second, the combined catalytic effect of the PtAu NPs reduces the activation energy, thereby accelerating the reaction course between the acetone molecules and ROS through the uniform distribution of the nanocatalysts.

4. Conclusions

Bimetallic PtAu NP–NP-modified SnO2 nanospheres were successfully synthesized using the one-step hydrothermal treatment and in situ reduction methods. The prepared PtAu/SnO2 nanosphere sensor was applied to the gas-sensitive detection of acetone. Electron microscopy analysis indicated that uniform-sized PtAu NPs are dispersed on the surface of the SnO2 nanospheres. The synthetic method was considerably simple and effective and did not introduce any surface activity. This approach can serve as a typical method for modifying bimetallic NPs on the surface of different MOS materials. The PtAu/SnO2 nanosphere sensor exhibited a significantly enhanced gas-sensitive response, and it showed good selectivity and sensitivity (Ra/Rg = 492.3), fast response and recovery times (14 and 13 s, respectively), and an acetone gas DL of 158 ppb at the optimal response temperature (300 °C). Compared to pure SnO2 nanospheres, modification with bimetallic PtAu NPs was more effective in enhancing the gas-sensitive efficiency of SnO2 nanospheres, and their response value was 20.8 times that of pure SnO2 nanospheres. This improved gas sensitivity was because of the chemical sensitization of the Au NPs, the electron sensitization of Pt NPs, along with the combined impact of bimetallic. The sensor developed in this study can accurately detect ppb-level acetone gas to meet the needs of the diagnosis and early screening of diabetes. Therefore, PtAu/SnO2 nanosphere sensors have considerable potential for the early diagnosis and screening of diabetes.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano14131097/s1, Figure S1: operating parameters of ICP-MS; Figure S2: sensing response of the PtAu/SnO2 sensors to 1 ppm acetone at 300 °C; Table S1: Operating parameters of ICP-MS; Equation (S1); Equation (S2). Ref. [10] is cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.Z. and R.G.; formal analysis, R.G. and P.C.; investigation, X.Z. and R.G.; writing—original draft preparation, R.G.; writing—review and editing, X.Z., R.G., and H.Y.; visualization, P.C. and Y.Y.; supervision, Y.L.; projection administration, P.L. and Y.L.; funding acquisition, R.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Beijing Municipal Finance Special Project (1120241644KF002-03).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhao, J.; Shen, W.; Lv, D.; Yin, J.; Liang, T.; Song, W. Gas-sensing technology for human breath detection. Prog. Chem. 2023, 35, 302–317. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lee, S.; Choi, S.; Park, S.H.; Cho, S.H.; Sohn, W.; Eom, T.H.; Kim, Y.; Jang, H.W. Synthesis-in-place hydrothermal growth of hematite nanorods on patterned substrate for highly sensitive and rapid acetone detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2023, 395, 134519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alizadeh, N.; Jamalabadi, H.; Tavoli, F. Breath acetone sensors as non-invasive health monitoring systems: A Review. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 20, 5–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Feng, G.; Che, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, S.; Hu, J.; Xiao, J.; Song, C.; Jiang, L. Sensitivity enhancement of In2O3/ZrO2 composite based acetone gas sensor: A promising collaborative approach of ZrO2 as the heterojunction and dopant for in-situ grown octahedron–like particles. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 367, 132087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ma, S.; Xu, J. Nanostructured metal oxide heterojunctions for chemiresistive gas sensors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2023, 11, 23742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, F.; Jing, J.; Li, J.; Li, S.; Ye, S.; Song, X.; Zhan, Z.; Zhang, Y. Fabrication of ZnO–SnO2 heterojunction inverse opal photonic balls for chemiresistive acetone sensing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2024, 400, 134887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mondal, B.; Gogoi, P.K. Nanoscale heterostructured materials based on metal oxides for a chemiresistive gas sensor. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2022, 4, 59–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Walker, J.; Karnati, P.; Akbar, S.A.; Morris, P.A. Selectivity mechanisms in resistive–type metal oxide heterostructural gas sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 355, 131242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kong, L.; Yuan, Z.; Gao, H.; Meng, F. Recent progress of gas sensors based on metal oxide composites derived from bimetallic metal-organic frameworks. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2023, 166, 117199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, X.; Sun, J.; Tang, K.; Wang, H.; Chen, T.; Jiang, K.; Zhou, T.; Quan, H.; Guo, R. Ultralow detection limit and ultrafast response/recovery of the H2 gas sensor based on Pd–doped rGO/ZnO–SnO2 from hydrothermal synthesis. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2022, 8, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xiang, C.; Chen, T.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, J.; Jiang, K.; Li, Y.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, N.; Guo, R. Facile hydrothermal synthesis of SnO2 nanoflowers for low–concentration formaldehyde detection. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Masuda, Y. Recent advances in SnO2 nanostructure based gas sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 364, 131876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhu, L.; Ou, L.; Mao, L.; Wu, X.; Liu, Y.; Lu, H. Advances in noble metal-decorated metal oxide nanomaterials for chemiresistive gas sensors: Overview. Nano-Micro Lett. 2023, 15, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Verma, M.; Bahuguna, G.; Singh, S.; Kumari, A.; Ghosh, D.; Haick, H.; Gupta, R. Porous SnO2 nanosheets for room temperature ammonia sensing in extreme humidity. Mater. Horiz. 2024, 11, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pandey, G.; Bhardwaj, M.; Kumar, S.; Lawaniya, S.D.; Kumar, M.; Dwivedi, P.K.; Awasthi, K. Synergistic effects of Pd–Ag decoration on SnO/SnO2 nanosheets for enhanced hydrogen sensing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2024, 402, 135062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lei, B.; Zhang, H.; Liu, W.; Zhao, Q.; Wei, Y.; Lu, Y.; Yang, X.; Zhang, W.; Xiao, T.; Kong, J.; et al. Micro–heater embedded Ni-SnO2 ordered nanoporous films: On–chip fabrication for fast, sensitive, and selective gas sensing towards multiple VOCs for air quality monitoring. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2024, 401, 134907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fan, G.; Huo, F.; Guan, J.; Yu, H.; Zhu, Q.; Han, N.; Mo, J.; Chen, Y. MnO2 enhanced low temperature HCHO sensing performance of SnO2. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2024, 412, 135803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, G.; Cheng, Z.; Xiang, Q.; Yan, L.; Wang, X.; Xu, J. Bimetal PdAu decorated SnO2 nanosheets based gas sensor with temperature-dependent dual selectivity for detecting formaldehyde and acetone. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 283, 590–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhu, Y.; Meng, X.; Wang, X.; Gao, W. Low detection based on PdPt/In2O3 nanospheres for rapid hydrogen detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2024, 410, 135654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Luo, N.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, D.; Guo, M.; Xue, Z.; Wang, X.; Cheng, Z.; Xu, J. High–sensitive MEMS hydrogen sulfide sensor made from PdRh bimetal hollow nanoframe decorated metal oxides and sensitization mechanism study. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 56203–56215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Feng, D.; Zhu, Z.; Du, L.; Xing, X.; Wang, C.; Chen, J.; Tian, Y.; Yang, D. Improved sensing performance of WO3 nanoparticles decorated with Ag and Pt nanoparticles. Rare Met. 2021, 40, 1642–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jamnani, S.R.; Moghaddam, H.M.; Leonardi, S.G.; Neri, G.; Ferlazzo, A. VOCs sensing properties of samarium oxide nanorods. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liang, Z.; Wang, M.; Liu, S.; Hassan, M.; Zhang, X.; Lei, S.; Qiao, G.; Liu, G. One-pot hydrothermal synthesis of self-assembled MoS2/WS2 nanoflowers for chemiresistive room-temperature NO2 sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2024, 403, 135215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, Z.; Liu, W.; Si, X.; Guo, J.; Huo, J.; Zhang, Z.; Cheng, G.; Du, Z. In situ assembly of one–dimensional Pt@ZnO nanofibers driven by a ZIF–8 framework for achieving a high–performance acetone sensor. Nanoscale 2023, 15, 17206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jang, J.S.; Kim, S.J.; Choi, S.J.; Kim, N.H.; Hakim, M.; Rothschild, A.; Kim, I.D. Thin–walled SnO2 nanotubes functionalized with Pt and Au catalysts via the protein templating route and their selective detection of acetone and hydrogen sulfide molecules. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 16417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Yang, L.; Liu, Z.; Li, Y.; Bai, J.; Liu, F.; Liang, X.; Sun, P.; Lu, G. Fast detection of ppm n–pentanol by PtAu alloy nanocrystals decorated flower-like WO3. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 371, 132623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, K.; Zhou, Y.; Jin, R.; Wang, T.; Liu, F.; Wang, C.; Yan, X.; Sun, P.; Lu, G. Gas sensor based on cobalt–doped 3D inverse opal SnO2 for air quality monitoring. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 350, 130807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kim, K.; Choi, P.G.; Itoh, T.; Masuda, Y. Catalyst–free highly sensitive SnO2 nanosheet gas sensors for parts per billion–level detection of acetone. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 51637–51644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, Y.; Cao, Y. Ultrasensitive and low detection limit of acetone gas sensor based on ZnO/SnO2 thick films. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 35958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, W.; Xian, J.; Li, J.; Yu, M.; Duan, Q.; Leung, C.M.; Zeng, M.; Gao, X. Construction of Co3O4/SnO2 yolk–shell nanofibers for acetone gas detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2024, 398, 134724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guo, W.; Luo, R.; Liu, F.; Wang, X. Enhanced acetone gas sensing performance of Zn2SnO4/SnO2 hierarchical stack structure. Mater. Lett. 2023, 352, 135176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bai, J.; Wang, C.; Liu, K.; Wang, H.; Liu, Y.; Liu, F.; Suo, H.; Liang, X.; Zhang, C.; Liu, F.; et al. Ehnahced gas sensing performance based on the PtCu octahedral alloy nanocrystals decorated SnO2 nanoclusters. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 330, 129375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shao, S.; Chen, X.; Chen, Y.; Lai, M.; Che, L. Ultrasensitive and highly selective detection of acetone based on Au@WO3–SnO2 corrugated nanofibers. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 473, 902–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jeong, Y.J.; Koo, W.T.; Jang, J.S.; Kim, D.H.; Cho, H.J.; Kim, I.D. Chitosan–templated Pt nanocatalyst loaded mesoporous SnO2 nanofibers: A superior chemiresistor toward acetone molecules. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 13713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sui, N.; Wei, X.; Cao, S.; Zhang, P.; Zhou, T.; Zhang, T. Nanoscale bimetallic AuPt–functionalized metal oxide chemiresistors: Ppb–level and selective detection for ozone and acetone. ACS Sens. 2022, 7, 2178–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Fabrication of SnO2 nanospheres decorated with PtAu NPs.
Figure 1. Fabrication of SnO2 nanospheres decorated with PtAu NPs.
Nanomaterials 14 01097 g001
Figure 2. The obtained XRD spectra for the SnO2 and PtAu/SnO2 nanospheres.
Figure 2. The obtained XRD spectra for the SnO2 and PtAu/SnO2 nanospheres.
Nanomaterials 14 01097 g002
Figure 3. The acquired FE-SEM images for (a) the pristine SnO2 nanospheres, (b) the PtAu/SnO2, and (cf) the FE-SEM elemental mapping images of (b).
Figure 3. The acquired FE-SEM images for (a) the pristine SnO2 nanospheres, (b) the PtAu/SnO2, and (cf) the FE-SEM elemental mapping images of (b).
Nanomaterials 14 01097 g003
Figure 4. (a) The obtained HRTEM image for PtAu/SnO2 and (b) SAED pattern of the PtAu/SnO2.
Figure 4. (a) The obtained HRTEM image for PtAu/SnO2 and (b) SAED pattern of the PtAu/SnO2.
Nanomaterials 14 01097 g004
Figure 5. The obtained XPS survey spectrum for (a) pristine SnO2 and PtAu/SnO2, (b) Sn 3d, (c) O 1s, (d) Pt 4f, and (e) Au 4f HR-XPS spectrum for pristine SnO2, Pt/SnO2, Au/SnO2, and PtAu/SnO2.
Figure 5. The obtained XPS survey spectrum for (a) pristine SnO2 and PtAu/SnO2, (b) Sn 3d, (c) O 1s, (d) Pt 4f, and (e) Au 4f HR-XPS spectrum for pristine SnO2, Pt/SnO2, Au/SnO2, and PtAu/SnO2.
Nanomaterials 14 01097 g005
Figure 6. (a) Response of pristine SnO2 sensors and PtAu/SnO2 sensors to 100 ppm acetone at various temperature values. (b) Selectivity test of PtAu/SnO2 sensors against 100 ppm of NH3, CH3COCH3, C2H5OH, CH3OH, C7H8, C8H10, C6H6, C6H14, and HCHO at 300 °C. (c) Dynamic response plots of PtAu/SnO2 materials to varying amounts of acetone (0.166–100 ppm) at 300 °C. (d) Linear response of PtAu/SnO2 sensors with acetone gas concentration.
Figure 6. (a) Response of pristine SnO2 sensors and PtAu/SnO2 sensors to 100 ppm acetone at various temperature values. (b) Selectivity test of PtAu/SnO2 sensors against 100 ppm of NH3, CH3COCH3, C2H5OH, CH3OH, C7H8, C8H10, C6H6, C6H14, and HCHO at 300 °C. (c) Dynamic response plots of PtAu/SnO2 materials to varying amounts of acetone (0.166–100 ppm) at 300 °C. (d) Linear response of PtAu/SnO2 sensors with acetone gas concentration.
Nanomaterials 14 01097 g006
Figure 7. (a) The obtained response as well as recovery times for the PtAu/SnO2 sensors to acetone (10 ppm) at 300 °C. (b) Repeatability of the PtAu/SnO2 sensor to acetone (10 ppm) at 300 °C. (c) The 30-day stability tests of PtAu/SnO2 sensors against acetone (10 ppm) at 300 °C. (d) Response of PtAu/SnO2 sensor across varying relative humidities to acetone (100 ppm) at 300 °C.
Figure 7. (a) The obtained response as well as recovery times for the PtAu/SnO2 sensors to acetone (10 ppm) at 300 °C. (b) Repeatability of the PtAu/SnO2 sensor to acetone (10 ppm) at 300 °C. (c) The 30-day stability tests of PtAu/SnO2 sensors against acetone (10 ppm) at 300 °C. (d) Response of PtAu/SnO2 sensor across varying relative humidities to acetone (100 ppm) at 300 °C.
Nanomaterials 14 01097 g007
Figure 8. Gas-sensing mechanism of the PtAu/SnO2 sensor. The upper images are schematic diagrams, and the bottom images are energy band diagrams.
Figure 8. Gas-sensing mechanism of the PtAu/SnO2 sensor. The upper images are schematic diagrams, and the bottom images are energy band diagrams.
Nanomaterials 14 01097 g008
Table 1. A comparison of the acetone recognition efficiency achieved for different materials on the basis of published results and the current work. (Temp. = To, Conc. = acetone concentration, Res./Rec. Time = response/recovery time, DL = detection limit).
Table 1. A comparison of the acetone recognition efficiency achieved for different materials on the basis of published results and the current work. (Temp. = To, Conc. = acetone concentration, Res./Rec. Time = response/recovery time, DL = detection limit).
MaterialsMorphologyTemp.
(°C)
Conc.
(ppm)
Res.Res./Rec.
Time (s/s)
DL (ppb)Ref.
SnO2Nanosheets280110.440/610200[28]
ZnO/SnO23D inverse opal photonic crystal balls2605040.36/10100[6]
ZnO/SnO2Thick films1800.53.3657/6310[29]
Co3O4/SnO2Yolk-shell nanofibers3501002170.62/46.5100[30]
Zn2SnO4/SnO2Hierarchical stack structure275303313/6664.25[31]
Pt40Cu60/SnO2Octahedral alloy nanocrystal-decorated nanoclusters240522.041.5/5820[32]
PdAu/SnO23D nanosheets25026.55/445[18]
Au/WO3-SnO2Corrugated nanofibers 1500.579.6[33]
Chitosan-Pt/SnO2Mesoporous nanofibers350138.412/445[34]
PtAu/SnO2Nanospheres3001059.414/13158Present study
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, X.; Cao, P.; Li, P.; Yu, Y.; Guo, R.; Li, Y.; Yang, H. Bimetallic PtAu-Decorated SnO2 Nanospheres Exhibiting Enhanced Gas Sensitivity for Ppb-Level Acetone Detection. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 1097. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14131097

AMA Style

Zhu X, Cao P, Li P, Yu Y, Guo R, Li Y, Yang H. Bimetallic PtAu-Decorated SnO2 Nanospheres Exhibiting Enhanced Gas Sensitivity for Ppb-Level Acetone Detection. Nanomaterials. 2024; 14(13):1097. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14131097

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Xiaofeng, Pei Cao, Peng Li, Yue Yu, Ruihua Guo, Yongzhen Li, and Hui Yang. 2024. "Bimetallic PtAu-Decorated SnO2 Nanospheres Exhibiting Enhanced Gas Sensitivity for Ppb-Level Acetone Detection" Nanomaterials 14, no. 13: 1097. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14131097

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop