Next Article in Journal
Photoelectric Properties of GaS1−xSex (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) Layered Crystals
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effectiveness Mechanisms of Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs) as Reinforcements for Magnesium-Based Composites for Biomedical Applications: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Magnetic Nanoparticle Support with an Ultra-Thin Chitosan Layer Preserves the Catalytic Activity of the Immobilized Glucose Oxidase
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Improving the Adhesion of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes to Titanium by Irradiating the Interface with He+ Ions: Atomic Force Microscopy and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Study

by
Petr M. Korusenko
1,2,*,
Egor V. Knyazev
2,3,
Olga V. Petrova
1,4,
Denis V. Sokolov
3,
Sergey N. Povoroznyuk
2,3,
Konstantin E. Ivlev
3,
Ksenia A. Bakina
1,4,
Vyacheslav A. Gaas
1 and
Alexander S. Vinogradov
1
1
Department of Solid State Electronics, V.A. Fock Institute of Physics, St. Petersburg State University, 7/9 Universitetskaya Nab., 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia
2
Department of Physics, Omsk State Technical University, 11 Mira Prosp., 644050 Omsk, Russia
3
Laboratory of Physics of Nanomaterials for Chemical Current Sources, Omsk Scientific Center of SB RAS, 15 Karl Marx Prosp., 644024 Omsk, Russia
4
Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Komi Science Centre, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 167982 Syktyvkar, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2024, 14(8), 699; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14080699
Submission received: 28 March 2024 / Revised: 12 April 2024 / Accepted: 16 April 2024 / Published: 17 April 2024

Abstract

:
A complex study of the adhesion of multi-walled carbon nanotubes to a titanium surface, depending on the modes of irradiation with He+ ions of the “MWCNT/Ti” system, was conducted using atomic force microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. A quantitative assessment of the adhesion force at the interface, performed using atomic force microscopy, demonstrated its significant increase as a result of treatment of the “MWCNT/Ti” system with a beam of helium ions. The nature of the chemical bonding between multi-walled carbon nanotubes and the surface of the titanium substrate, which causes this increase in the adhesion of nanotubes to titanium as a result of ion irradiation, was investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. It was established that this bonding is the result of the formation of chemical C–O–Ti bonds between titanium and carbon atoms with the participation of oxygen atoms of oxygen-containing functional groups, which are localized on defects in the nanotube walls formed during ion irradiation. It is significant that there are no signs of direct bonding between titanium and carbon atoms.

1. Introduction

With the ongoing miniaturization of electronic devices, the industry of portable chemical energy sources such as lithium-ion batteries and supercapacitors is developing rapidly [1,2]. The use of nanocomposite materials based on multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and conductive polymers as supercapacitors’ electrode materials is considered a way to improve the energy characteristics of these devices. The improvement is due to a combination of two factors. Firstly, there is the high specific surface area of MWCNTs, which increases the electrical double layer capacity, and secondly, a conductive polymer contributes to the capacity through redox reactions (pseudo-capacity) [3,4]. However, the practical application of such a material is significantly hampered by the poor adhesion of MWCNTs to the conductive substrate.
Currently, researchers are trying to solve this problem by adding polymer binders during the preparation of the electrode material, such as polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), styrene-butadiene latex (SBL), etc. [5,6,7]. However, this approach is accompanied by a significant decrease in the conductivity of the electrode material, which creates a need to develop new binder compositions and other methods for increasing the adhesion of the electrode to the substrate.
As a promising alternative approach for improving the adhesion between the carbon layer and the substrate, the method of irradiation with Ar+ ions has been tested using the MWCNT/Ti interface as an example [8]. However, this study focused on a qualitative characterization of the interfacial adhesion, without quantification, which makes it difficult to understand the nature of the increased adhesive strength between MWCNTs and titanium.
According to [9,10,11,12,13,14], the adhesive strength of a carbon nanotube layer on a substrate can be measured using macro- and micromechanical techniques. For these materials, adhesion strength is determined by the applied force (tensile, shear, or peel) required to break the bond between the two materials. However, qualitative methods for evaluating adhesion in these systems are not reliable, as they lack a standard evaluation procedure [15,16,17].
In [9,14,18,19,20], the prospects for using atomic force microscopy (AFM) to characterize the interaction between carbon nanostructures and a substrate were investigated. These studies demonstrated that the AFM technique can be used to quantify the strength of this interaction, which opens up the possibility of numerical comparison and control of this strength for different carbon-nanostructure–substrate combinations.
The purpose of this work was to conduct a complex experimental investigation of the initial and irradiated MWCNT/Ti systems using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). In addition, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were used to characterize the morphology and the elemental composition of the samples, respectively. The main tasks of this research were to quantify the adhesion strength between MWCNTs and the titanium surface after various irradiation parameters using AFM, as well as to clarify the nature of the increased adhesion strength induced by ion irradiation using XPS.

2. Materials and Methods

Commercial MWCNTs (MWCNTs-2, produced by the G.K. Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SB RAS)) [21] with a specific surface area of 250 m2/g and an average outer diameter of 4 to 21 nm were used in this study. To deposit the MWCNT layer on the titanium surface, firstly, a suspension was prepared by dispersing the nanotubes in isopropyl alcohol. For this purpose, 5 mg of MWCNT powder was treated in 15 mL of alcohol in a Jeken Ultrasonic Cleaner (model PS-06A, Dongguan City, China) for 5 h. The MWCNT layer was deposited on the titanium substrate (~50 μm thick foil), which was heated to 70 °C, by spraying the suspension using an air compressor with 10 W power and a 10 L/min flow rate. The thickness of the prepared MWCNT layers was ~1 μm.
Ion beam treatment of the surface of the MWCNT/Ti system with He+ ions with an average energy of 20 keV was carried out for 10, 20 and 30 min in an implanter at the Omsk Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The ion beam was generated by ionizing helium atoms in a Penning discharge under the influence of crossed magnetic and electric fields. The average energy of the ion beam was chosen based on the expected thickness of the MWCNT layer on Ti, which was calculated from an analysis of the projective range of helium ions through the MWCNT layer using the SRIM-2013 program [22]. The beam fluence and the degree of defectiveness of the MWCNT layer on the substrate varied depending on the duration of exposure.
The morphology and elemental composition of the “MWCNT/Ti” system were studied before and after irradiation via the SEM and EDS methods, using a JEOL JSM-6610LV (Tokyo, Japan) electron microscope equipped with an Inca-XAct energy-dispersive spectrometer.
Additionally, the morphology of the samples was also characterized using AFM in the semi-contact mode (with a cantilever spring constant of 17 N/m). In contrast, the contact mode (with a cantilever spring constant of 34 N/m) was used to quantify the adhesion strength of the MWCNT layer to the titanium substrate and its changes after ion irradiation. The surface of the MWCNT layer was scanned at 50 µm/s and a loading force, the probe to sample in the range of 0.4–26 μN, which increased by 0.2 μN with each subsequent scan. The loading force (F, µN) was determined from the signal of the laser-optical cantilever system (DFL, V) to be F = k · ∆z · DFL, where k is the spring constant of the cantilever, and ∆z is the angle of the experimental force–distance curve, nm/V. All the measurements were carried out using the MFP-3D atomic force microscope (Asylum Research, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) with HA_HR cantilevers (TipsNano, Tallinn, Estonia). The adhesion of the layer to the substrate was determined based on the magnitude of force required to separate the layer from the substrate while gradually increasing the force applied by the probe to the MWCNT surface.
Clarification of the nature of increased adhesion of MWCNTs to due to ion irradiation of MWCNT/Ti and detailed characterization of the mechanisms of this phenomenon were conducted based on the results of an analysis of the shapes and binding energies of the C 1s, O 1s, and Ti 2p core-level photoelectron (CL PE) spectra for the initial and irradiated “MWCNT-Ti” systems. Measured PE spectra were also used to obtain additional information about the elemental compositions of these systems. All measurements were performed using an ESCALAB 250Xi laboratory electron spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with monochromatized AlKα radiation ( = 1486.6 eV) at the St. Petersburg State University Research Park (Centre for Physical Methods of Surface Investigation). Survey and CL (C 1s, O 1s, and Ti 2p) PE spectra were measured with analyzer pass energies of 50 eV and 20 eV, respectively. Calibration of the binding energy scale was accomplished using a pure gold foil, for which the position of the Au 4f7/2 PE line and Fermi level were measured. A detailed analysis of the CL PE spectra was performed by approximating the spectra with a set of individual components using the Casa XPS 2.3.16 software [23].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. SEM

The SEM data (Figure 1a) show the presence of a uniform continuous layer of MWCNTs on the titanium substrate, with an average outer diameter of the nanotubes of up to 20 nm. The nanotubes in this layer are mainly oriented parallel to the substrate and form numerous intersections and overlaps with each other. On the surface of the MWCNT layer, individual nanotube agglomerates of up to 1 μm in size without clearly defined boundaries are observed, which are produced during the layer deposition.
Irradiation of the MWCNT layer on a Ti substrate with a helium-ion beam was carried out at different exposure times. As a result of 10 min irradiation, a clearer boundary of agglomerates can be observed on the surface of the layer due to rounded cavities (Figure 1b). The formation of these cavities is probably associated with the partial destruction of nanotubes by helium ions. With increasing irradiation time, the number and size of cavities between the nanotubes increase to approximately 500 nm (Figure 1c,d). In the magnified SEM images of the MWCNT layer (inset in Figure 1c,d), there are signs of welding between the individual MWCNTs. Thus, as a result of irradiation with a helium-ion beam, pronounced morphological changes in the surface layer of MWCNTs are observed.

3.2. EDS

The average elemental analysis data obtained through the EDS technique are shown in Table 1. As the time of ion beam treatment of the MWCNT surface increases, there is an increase in the titanium concentration and a decrease in the carbon concentration in the examined regions of samples. This result can be explained by a decrease in the thickness and density of the MWCNT layer during irradiation with helium ions.

3.3. AFM

Figure 2 shows AFM images of the surface layer of a “MWCNT/Ti” system obtained in the semi-contact mode before and after irradiation. On the surface of the untreated sample (Figure 2a), there is a network of intersecting thread-like structures of MWCNTs, which are also visible on the SEM image (Figure 1a).
After the irradiation, the thread-like structures disappear, which may be due to the compacting of the surface layer as a result of the welding of nanotubes. In the images of the irradiated layers, cavities between nanotubes can be seen (Figure 2b–d), which agrees with the SEM data (Figure 1).
Quantitative evaluation of the interfacial adhesion between the surface MWCNT layer and the Ti substrate was carried out using the AFM contact mode technique. The destruction of the MWCNT layer on the Ti substrate was assessed by scanning the sample in the semi-contact mode. The adhesion force was determined as the loading force applied by the AFM probe, at which a layer of nanotubes was removed from the substrate surface in the scanning area. The results of the average adhesion forces for the MWCNT layer before and after irradiation with helium ions are presented in Table 2.
As can be seen in Table 2, the adhesion strength between MWCNTs and the Ti substrate depends on the time of ion beam treatment. Ion irradiation with helium for 10 min does not affect the adhesion strength, whereas an increase in adhesion is observed after 20 and 30 min. It is important to note that the duration of ion exposure generally affects the concentration of defects formed in the “MWCNT/Ti” system during its irradiation with helium ions. Consequently, an increase in the ion treatment time contributes to an increase in the concentration of point and extended structural defects at the “MWCNT/Ti” interface. It seems that this has a positive effect on the adhesive strength of the MWCNT layer to the titanium substrate. In addition, oxygen-containing functional groups (OCFGs) can also attach to the defective surface of carbon nanotubes from the residual gas environment of the implanter’s working chamber [24]. This can also affect the nature of the bonding between the MWCNT layer and the titanium substrate.

3.4. XPS

Elemental analysis of untreated and irradiated samples was also carried out by XPS by analyzing the intensities of individual PE lines of elements in the survey PE spectra (Figure 3). Quantitative determination of element concentrations was performed by the method of elemental sensitivity coefficients. The results are summarized in Table 3. The general trend in the changes in the percentage of individual elements observed in the XPS spectra corresponds to the changes in the EDX data (see Table 2). However, when comparing the results from these two methods, it should be taken into account that the XPS is a surface-sensitive method and probes the sample to a depth of approximately 3–5 nm, whereas the EDX method examines a surface layer 1.2–1.5 µm thick. Therefore, EDX data mainly contain information from the titanium substrate, resulting in a significantly higher concentration of titanium atoms and a lower concentration of carbon and oxygen compared to the surface-sensitive XPS method.
According to elemental analysis using XPS, it was found that as the irradiation time of the MWCNT layer on a titanium substrate rises, the concentration of oxygen and titanium atoms in the surface layers increases, while the concentration of carbon atoms simultaneously decreases (Table 3). This change in concentration is associated with a reduction in the thickness and density of the nanotube layer, as well as the appearance of cavities during ion irradiation. The increase in oxygen percentage is likely due to the formation of defects in the MWCNT structure and the attachment of OCFGs to them, as well as an increasing contribution from the oxide layer on the titanium substrate surface [8].
A detailed analysis of the C 1s, O 1s, and Ti 2p PE spectra of MWCNT/Ti samples measured before and after irradiation with a helium-ion beam allowed us to gain the most complete information about the nature of the increased interfacial adhesion in these systems caused by irradiation.
Figure 4 shows the C 1s PE spectra of “MWCNT/Ti” before and after ion treatment. The spectrum of the sample before irradiation (Figure 4a) contains five components that correspond to graphite-like sp2 carbon C=C (~284.6 eV, C1), sp3 carbon C–C in diamond and/or carbon located near oxygen-containing functional groups [C*–C(O)] (~285.5 eV, C2), carbon in the C–O (~286.4 eV, C3) and C=O (~287.5 eV, C4) groups, as well as carbon in the COOH– groups (~289 eV, C5) [24,25,26]. The high-energy maximum sh (~291 eV) represents a satellite, which is typical for C 1s PE spectra of sp2 carbon atoms in systems with a high degree of graphitization and is associated with the π→π* shake-up process occurring simultaneously with C 1s photoionization [25].
Figure 4 clearly shows that as a result of irradiation, significant changes occur in the shape of the C 1s PE spectrum, namely, an increase in its full width at half maximum (FWHM) from 0.7 eV to 1.45 eV, a redistribution of the relative intensities of its components, and the disappearance of the shake-up satellite. All this indicates a change in the content of carbon atoms in different chemical states, the possible formation of additional chemical bonds between the carbon atoms of MWCNTs and other atoms of the system, as well as significant defect formation in the graphite-like walls of nanotubes. A detailed comparison of these spectra (Figure 4b–d) reveals that the change in FWHM for the C 1s PE spectra of the irradiated MWCNT/Ti system is due to a redistribution of the relative intensities of the C1 component (sp2 carbon) and the C2, C3, and C4 components, which belong to the carbon atoms interacting with oxygen atoms. These findings in the C 1s PE spectra of irradiated samples indicate that the outer walls of MWCNTs undergo significant structural damage as a result of ion irradiation, which leads to an increase in the degree of wall imperfection and the anchorage of OCFGs at the sites of formed defects. Here, an increase in the ion beam irradiation time from 10 to 30 min is accompanied by an intensification of the formation of structural defects and oxidation of the outer walls of MWCNTs. It is important to note that in all C 1s PE spectra of the irradiated samples, there is no component at a binding energy of ~282.1 eV, corresponding to C 1s electrons in titanium carbide [27].
Figure 5 shows the Ti 2p1/2,3/2 PE spectra of the MWCNT/Ti system measured before and after ion treatment. In the following, we will only consider the most intense Ti 2p3/2 spectrum. In this spectrum of the “MWCNT/Ti” system before and after irradiation, three components are observed, which correspond to metallic titanium atoms (~454.2 eV, Ti1), partially oxidized titanium atoms in TiO1−x and TiO2−x (~456.4 eV, Ti2), as well as titanium atoms in TiO2 (~458.4 eV, Ti3) [28,29,30]. It should be noted that the PE lines of TiO1−x and TiO2−x oxides in our previous study [8] were considered separate components, but due to difficulties of approximation, in this work, they were combined into one component.
From these data, it is clear that on the surface of the titanium substrate in all samples, oxide compounds of titanium atoms with varying degrees of oxidation dominate, while maintaining a certain proportion of Ti0 atoms. Moreover, in the spectra of the samples under consideration, as the irradiation time increases, a decrease in the relative intensity of the “metallic” component Ti1 and an increase in the intensity of the “dioxide” component Ti3 are observed. Such changes may be associated with additional oxidation of titanium atoms during ion beam treatment. It should be emphasized that the Ti 2p3/2 and C 1s PE spectra of the irradiated samples do not contain components at binding energies of ~455.4 eV and ~282.1 eV, associated, respectively, with Ti and C atoms in titanium carbides [27]. This observation suggests that direct chemical bonding between carbon and titanium atoms is absent from the studied MWCNT/Ti systems. Thus, we can conclude that the observed increase in adhesion upon ion irradiation of “MWCNT/Ti” cannot occur due to direct bonds between the atoms of the titanium substrate and carbon atoms in the MWCNT layer.
In the O 1s PE spectrum of the untreated MWCNT/Ti system (Figure 6a), three components can be distinguished, which correspond to oxygen atoms in TiO2 (~530.3 eV, O1), as well as in OCFGs with double and single chemical bonds between the atoms carbon and oxygen: C=O (~532 eV, O2) and C–O (~533.1 eV, O3) [28,29].
Irradiation of MWCNTs on a titanium substrate with helium ions for 10 min leads to a change in shape and broadening of the O 1s PE spectrum. Both effects are due to an increase in the intensities of the O1 and O3 components, which corresponds to oxygen in titanium oxides and in carbon compounds with a single chemical C–O bond. After 20 min of treatment of “MWCNT/Ti” with an ion beam, a further increase in the relative intensities of the O1 and O3 components is observed. At the same time, when this system is irradiated for 30 min, an increase in the relative intensity is detected only for the O1 component, while the intensity of the O3 component, on the contrary, decreases. The results of the three-component approximation of O 1s PE spectra for the MWCNT/Ti systems before and after irradiation are presented in Table 4.
The discovered change in the relative O1 intensity may be partly due to a decrease in the thickness of the MWCNTs layer as a result of its partial destruction by a helium-ion beam and an increase in the contribution of the titanium substrate surface to the spectrum. A possible reason for the nonmonotonic change in the relative intensity of O3 may be the ion-stimulated formation and destruction of C–O groups localized on the surface of carbon nanotubes on structural defects, the number of which increases with increasing irradiation time. A change in the amount of these C–O groups was previously observed in the C 1s PE spectra of irradiated samples (Figure 4).
It is now known that during the preparation of composites based on carbon nanomaterials (graphene or MWCNTs), chemical adhesion occurs between the carbon nanomaterial and metal oxide particles TiOx, SnOx, or CuO deposited on its surface [26,31,32,33,34,35,36]. This phenomenon is caused by the formation of direct chemical C–M bonds [34,35,36] or C–O–M bonds as a result of the linking of metal atoms M to C–O groups that appear on the surface of carbon materials due to ion bombardment in an oxygen-containing atmosphere [8,26]. In our case, a combined analysis of the C 1s and Ti 2p PE spectra showed that direct C–Ti bonds are not formed during ion irradiation. Therefore, the formation of C–O–Ti chemical bonds is more likely. At the same time, the energy position of the component corresponding to these bonds in the O 1s PE spectrum is close to the position of the O2 component corresponding to the O 1s PE line of C=O groups on the surface of the carbon material, which significantly complicates the interpretation of experimental spectra [31]. Therefore, we used information on the contents of C=O groups, obtained by taking into account the proportion of the O2 component relative to the total oxygen content for a specific sample (Table 4). When comparing these data, it is clear that the concentration of the O2 component barely changes with the duration of ion treatment, which occurs since, it seems, the proportion of carbon atoms in C=O bonds also increases. In view of this, it is more logical to consider the change in the O3 component, which is associated with C–O groups. It can be clearly seen (Table 4) that its concentration changes significantly when moving from the untreated MWCNT/Ti system to the irradiated ones. In this case, the maximum content of these groups is detected after irradiation with an ion beam for 20 or 30 min, which correlates with the change in the interfacial adhesion values of the MWCNT/Ti system obtained from AFM data (Table 2). These results allow us to conclude that when “MWCNT/Ti” systems are irradiated with helium ions, C–O–Ti chemical bonds are formed at the interface, which lead to an increase in the adhesion of MWCNTs to Ti. It should be emphasized that the formation of these bonds occurs with the participation of C–O functional groups, which are formed in an oxygen-containing atmosphere of an implanter during ion bombardment on the surface of MWCNTs and are localized to its structural defects.

4. Conclusions

A detailed study of MWCNT layers deposited on a titanium substrate has shown significant changes in the morphology and chemical composition of these samples as a result of their treatment with helium ions. It has been established that He+ ion irradiation of the MWCNT/Ti system leads to welding of individual nanotubes, their partial destruction with the formation of cavities, and, as a consequence, a decrease in the density of the MWCNT layer, which is confirmed by SEM, EDX, AFM, and XPS data. Meanwhile, increasing the ion beam irradiation time from 10 to 30 min intensifies these processes.
A quantitative assessment of the interfacial adhesion force of MWCNTs to Ti as a function of the time of exposure to an ion beam was carried out. It was shown that the highest value of the interfacial adhesion force, amounting to 18.3 μN (which is 57% higher than in the case of an untreated sample), is achieved when the MWCNT/Ti system is irradiated for 20 min. This result is explained by the formation of C–O–Ti bonds as a result of the chemical bonding of titanium atoms and oxygen-containing functional groups on the surface of MWCNTs, which are formed in the residual oxygen-containing atmosphere of the ion implanter near point and extended structural defects during irradiation with the ion beam. It is important that, in this case, the formation of direct Ti–C bonds between titanium and carbon atoms does not occur.
The results obtained will allow us to approach the problem of improving interfacial adhesion at the “MWCNT–current-collecting substrate” interface without using a binder, which will ensure the development of new highly efficient electrode materials based on carbon nanotubes and electrically conductive polymers for electrochemical applications (lithium-ion batteries and supercapacitors).

Author Contributions

P.M.K.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing—Review and Editing. E.V.K.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing—Original Draft. O.V.P.: Investigation, Methodology, Writing—Review and Editing. D.V.S.: Investigation. S.N.P.: Methodology, Formal Analysis. K.E.I.: Investigation. K.A.B.: Writing—Review and Editing. V.A.G.: Investigation, Visualization. A.S.V.: Methodology, Supervision, Writing—Review and Editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation (grant no. 21-72-10029), https://www.rscf.ru/en/project/21-72-10029/ (accessed on 15 April 2024).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The equipment of the Omsk Regional Center for Collective Use of the SB RAS and the St. Petersburg State University Research Park (Centre for Physical Methods of Surface Investigation) was used in this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Polozhentseva, Y.A.; Novozhilova, M.V.; Bykov, V.A.; Karushev, M.P. Modification of Porous Carbon Material with Polymeric Cobalt Complex with a Schiff Base of Salen-Type for Electrodes of Electrochemical Supercapacitors. Tech. Phys. Lett. 2020, 46, 913–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kompan, M.E.; Malyshkin, V.G.; Kuznetsov, V.P.; Krivchenko, V.A. Specifics of Energy Storage in a Double Layer on the Surface of a Graphene Material. Tech. Phys. Lett. 2017, 43, 177–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ahirrao, D.J.; Jha, N. Polyaniline-Manganese Dioxide Nanorods Nanocomposite as an Electrode Material for Supercapacitors. AIP Conf. Proc. 2017, 1832, 050168. [Google Scholar]
  4. Li, X.; Li, J.; Kang, F. Enhanced Electrochemical Performance of Salen-Type Transition Metal Polymer with Electron-Donating Substituents. Ionics 2019, 25, 1045–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bresser, D.; Buchholz, D.; Moretti, A.; Varzi, A.; Passerini, S. Alternative Binders for Sustainable Electrochemical Energy Storage—The Transition to Aqueous Electrode Processing and Bio-Derived Polymers. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 3096–3127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Istomina, A.S.; Bushkova, O.V. Polymer Binders for the Electrodes of Lithium Batteries Part 1. Polyvinylidene Fluoride, Its Derivatives and Other Commercialized Materials. Electrochem. Energetics 2020, 20, 115–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Eliseeva, S.N.; Kamenskii, M.A.; Tolstopyatova, E.G.; Kondratiev, V.V. Effect of Combined Conductive Polymer Binder on the Electrochemical Performance of Electrode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Energies 2020, 13, 2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Knyazev, E.V.; Korusenko, P.M.; Makushenko, R.V.; Nesov, S.N.; Povoroznyuk, S.N.; Ivlev, K.E.; Sivkov, D.V.; Petrova, O.V.; Vinogradov, A.S. Enhancing Interfacial Adhesion at the Carbon Nanotube/Titanium Interface Using Ion Beam Irradiation. Tech. Phys. Lett. 2024; in press. [Google Scholar]
  9. Santidrián, A.; Sanahuja, O.; Villacampa, B.; Diez, J.L.; Benito, A.M.; Maser, W.K.; Muñoz, E.; Ansón-Casaos, A. Chemical Postdeposition Treatments to Improve the Adhesion of Carbon Nanotube Films on Plastic Substrates. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 2804–2811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lahiri, I.; Lahiri, D.; Jin, S.; Agarwal, A.; Choi, W. Carbon Nanotubes: How Strong Is Their Bond with the Substrate? ACS Nano 2011, 5, 780–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lee, S.W.; Kim, K.K.; Cui, Y.; Lim, S.C.; Cho, Y.W.; Kim, S.M.; Lee, Y.H. Adhesion Test of Carbon Nanotube Film Coated onto Transparent Conducting Substrates. Nano 2010, 05, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ishikawa, M.; Harada, R.; Sasaki, N.; Miura, K. Adhesion and Peeling Forces of Carbon Nanotubes on a Substrate. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80, 193406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bouhamed, A.; Kia, A.M.; Naifar, S.; Dzhagan, V.; Müller, C.; Zahn, D.R.T.; Choura, S.; Kanoun, O. Tuning the Adhesion between Polyimide Substrate and MWCNTs/Epoxy Nanocomposite by Surface Treatment. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 422, 420–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Marrero Rosa, R.E.; Corr, D.J.; Espinosa, H.D.; Shah, S.P. Characterization of Adhesion Strength between Carbon Nanotubes and Cementitious Materials. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2023, 138, 104953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jang, C.W.; Byun, Y.T.; Woo, D.H.; Lee, S.; Jhon, Y.M. Enhanced Adhesion between Carbon Nanotubes and Substrate Surfaces by Low-Temperature Annealing. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2012, 61, 2096–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lim, S.C.; Choi, H.K.; Jeong, H.J.; Song, Y.I.; Kim, G.Y.; Jung, K.T.; Lee, Y.H. A Strategy for Forming Robust Adhesion with the Substrate in a Carbon-Nanotube Field-Emission Array. Carbon 2006, 44, 2809–2815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Su, H.-C.; Chen, C.-H.; Chen, Y.-C.; Yao, D.-J.; Chen, H.; Chang, Y.-C.; Yew, T.-R. Improving the Adhesion of Carbon Nanotubes to a Substrate Using Microwave Treatment. Carbon 2010, 48, 805–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ageev, O.A.; Blinov, Y.F.; Il’ina, M.V.; Il’in, O.I.; Smirnov, V.A.; Tsukanova, O.G. Study of Adhesion of Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotubes to a Substrate by Atomic-Force Microscopy. Phys. Solid State 2016, 58, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Il’in, O.I.; Il’ina, M.V.; Rudyk, N.N.; Fedotov, A.A. Adhesive Coatings Based on Aligned Arrays of Carbon Nanostructures. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 443, 012009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Strus, M.C.; Zalamea, L.; Raman, A.; Pipes, R.B.; Nguyen, C.V.; Stach, E.A. Peeling Force Spectroscopy: Exposing the Adhesive Nanomechanics of One-Dimensional Nanostructures. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 544–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Krasnikov, D.V.; Shmakov, A.N.; Kuznetsov, V.L.; Ishchenko, A.V. Towards the Optimization of Carbon Nanotube Properties via in Situ and Ex Situ Studies of the Growth Mechanism. J. Struct. Chem. 2016, 57, 1436–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ziegler, J.F.; Ziegler, M.D.; Biersack, J.P. SRIM—The Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter (2010). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 2010, 268, 1818–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fairley, N.; Fernandez, V.; Richard-Plouet, M.; Guillot-Deudon, C.; Walton, J.; Smith, E.; Flahaut, D.; Greiner, M.; Biesinger, M.; Tougaard, S.; et al. Systematic and Collaborative Approach to Problem Solving Using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv. 2021, 5, 100112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Korusenko, P.M.; Nesov, S.N.; Iurchenkova, A.A.; Fedorovskaya, E.O.; Bolotov, V.V.; Povoroznyuk, S.N.; Smirnov, D.A.; Vinogradov, A.S. Comparative Study of the Structural Features and Electrochemical Properties of Nitrogen-Containing Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes after Ion-Beam Irradiation and Hydrochloric Acid Treatment. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Korusenko, P.; Kharisova, K.; Knyazev, E.; Levin, O.; Vinogradov, A.; Alekseeva, E. Surface Engineering of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes via Ion-Beam Doping: Pyridinic and Pyrrolic Nitrogen Defect Formation. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 11057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nesov, S.N.; Korusenko, P.M.; Sachkov, V.A.; Bolotov, V.V.; Povoroznyuk, S.N. Effects of Preliminary Ion Beam Treatment of Carbon Nanotubes on Structures of Interfaces in MOx/Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube (M=Ti,Sn) Composites: Experimental and Theoretical Study. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2022, 169, 110831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Belhadj, H.; Moulefera, I.; Sabantina, L.; Benyoucef, A. Effects of Incorporating Titanium Dioxide with Titanium Carbide on Hybrid Materials Reinforced with Polyaniline: Synthesis, Characterization, Electrochemical and Supercapacitive Properties. Fibers 2022, 10, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ivanovskaya, M.; Ovodok, E.; Kotsikau, D.; Azarko, I.; Micusik, M.; Omastova, M.; Golovanov, V. Structural Transformation and Nature of Defects in Titanium Carbide Treated in Different Redox Atmospheres. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 25602–25608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Olowoyo, J.O.; Kumar, M.; Jain, S.L.; Babalola, J.O.; Vorontsov, A.V.; Kumar, U. Insights into Reinforced Photocatalytic Activity of the CNT–TiO2 Nanocomposite for CO2 Reduction and Water Splitting. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 367–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Eda, Y.; Manaka, T.; Hanawa, T.; Chen, P.; Ashida, M.; Noda, K. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy-based Valence Band Spectra of Passive Films on Titanium. Surf. Interface Anal. 2022, 54, 892–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, X.; Zhou, J.; Song, H.; Chen, X.; Fedoseeva, Y.V.; Okotrub, A.V.; Bulusheva, L.G. “Butterfly Effect” in CuO/Graphene Composite Nanosheets: A Small Interfacial Adjustment Triggers Big Changes in Electronic Structure and Li-Ion Storage Performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 17236–17244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sivkov, D.V.; Petrova, O.V.; Nekipelov, S.V.; Vinogradov, A.S.; Skandakov, R.N.; Isaenko, S.I.; Ob’edkov, A.M.; Kaverin, B.S.; Vilkov, I.V.; Korolev, R.I.; et al. The Identification of Cu–O–C Bond in Cu/MWCNTs Hybrid Nanocomposite by XPS and NEXAFS Spectroscopy. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wu, C.-H.; Kuo, C.-Y.; Chen, S.-T. Synergistic Effects between TiO2 and Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs) in a TiO2/CNTs System under Visible Light Irradiation. Environ. Technol. 2013, 34, 2513–2519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Felten, A.; Suarez-Martinez, I.; Ke, X.; Van Tendeloo, G.; Ghijsen, J.; Pireaux, J.; Drube, W.; Bittencourt, C.; Ewels, C.P. The Role of Oxygen at the Interface between Titanium and Carbon Nanotubes. ChemPhysChem 2009, 10, 1799–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zikalala, S.A.; Chabalala, M.B.; Gumbi, N.N.; Coville, N.J.; Mamba, B.B.; Mutuma, B.K.; Nxumalo, E.N. Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Titania–Amorphous Carbon Nanotubes/Amorphous Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Nanotubes Nanohybrids for Photocatalytic Degradation of Textile Wastewater. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 6748–6763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ye, W.; Chi, Q.; Zhou, H.; Gao, P. Ball-Milling Preparation of Titanium/Graphene Composites and Its Enhanced Hydrogen Storage Ability. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 19164–19173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM images of “MWCNT/Ti” surface layer: (a) initial and irradiated with He+ for (b) 10 min, (c) 20 min, and (d) 30 min.
Figure 1. SEM images of “MWCNT/Ti” surface layer: (a) initial and irradiated with He+ for (b) 10 min, (c) 20 min, and (d) 30 min.
Nanomaterials 14 00699 g001
Figure 2. AFM images of “MWCNT/Ti” surface layer: (a) initial and irradiated with He+ for (b) 10 min, (c) 20 min and (d) 30 min.
Figure 2. AFM images of “MWCNT/Ti” surface layer: (a) initial and irradiated with He+ for (b) 10 min, (c) 20 min and (d) 30 min.
Nanomaterials 14 00699 g002
Figure 3. Survey PE spectra of “MWCNT/Ti” surface: (a) initial and irradiated with He+ for (b) 10 min, (c) 20 min, and (d) 30 min.
Figure 3. Survey PE spectra of “MWCNT/Ti” surface: (a) initial and irradiated with He+ for (b) 10 min, (c) 20 min, and (d) 30 min.
Nanomaterials 14 00699 g003
Figure 4. C 1s PE spectra of “MWCNT/Ti” surface: (a) initial and irradiated with He+ for (b) 10 min, (c) 20 min, and (d) 30 min.
Figure 4. C 1s PE spectra of “MWCNT/Ti” surface: (a) initial and irradiated with He+ for (b) 10 min, (c) 20 min, and (d) 30 min.
Nanomaterials 14 00699 g004
Figure 5. Ti 2p1/2,3/2 PE spectra of “MWCNT/Ti” surface: (a) initial and irradiated with He+ for (b) 10 min, (c) 20 min, and (d) 30 min.
Figure 5. Ti 2p1/2,3/2 PE spectra of “MWCNT/Ti” surface: (a) initial and irradiated with He+ for (b) 10 min, (c) 20 min, and (d) 30 min.
Nanomaterials 14 00699 g005
Figure 6. O 1s PE spectra of “MWCNT/Ti” surface: (a) initial and irradiated with He+ for (b) 10 min, (c) 20 min, and (d) 30 min.
Figure 6. O 1s PE spectra of “MWCNT/Ti” surface: (a) initial and irradiated with He+ for (b) 10 min, (c) 20 min, and (d) 30 min.
Nanomaterials 14 00699 g006
Table 1. Elemental compositions of initial and He+-irradiated “MWCNT/Ti” systems according to EDS data.
Table 1. Elemental compositions of initial and He+-irradiated “MWCNT/Ti” systems according to EDS data.
SampleConcentration, at. %
[C][O][Ti]
Initial MWCNT/Ti40.85.354.0
MWCNT/Ti, irradiated for 10 min35.74.260.1
MWCNT/Ti, irradiated for 20 min29.77.462.9
MWCNT/Ti, irradiated for 30 min25.75.468.9
Table 2. Values of adhesion strength between MWCNTs and titanium substrate for initial and He+-irradiated “MWCNT/Ti” systems for 10, 20, and 30 min.
Table 2. Values of adhesion strength between MWCNTs and titanium substrate for initial and He+-irradiated “MWCNT/Ti” systems for 10, 20, and 30 min.
SampleInitial MWCNT/TiMWCNT/Ti,
Irradiated for 10 min
MWCNT/Ti,
Irradiated for 20 min
MWCNT/Ti,
Irradiated for 30 min
Adhesion Strength
F, μN10.5 ± 0.510.5 ± 0.518.3 ± 1.014.4 ± 1.3
Table 3. Elemental compositions of the surface layer of initial and He+-irradiated “MWCNT/Ti” systems according to XPS data.
Table 3. Elemental compositions of the surface layer of initial and He+-irradiated “MWCNT/Ti” systems according to XPS data.
SampleConcentration, at. %
[C][O][Ti]
Initial MWCNT/Ti93.805.210.99
MWCNT/Ti, irradiated for 10 min85.8813.380.74
MWCNT/Ti, irradiated for 20 min83.0114.932.06
MWCNT/Ti, irradiated for 30 min80.3816.453.17
Table 4. The results of a three-component approximation of the intensity distribution in the O 1s PE spectra and an estimation of the concentrations of various oxygen-containing components for the initial and He+-irradiated “MWCNT/Ti” systems.
Table 4. The results of a three-component approximation of the intensity distribution in the O 1s PE spectra and an estimation of the concentrations of various oxygen-containing components for the initial and He+-irradiated “MWCNT/Ti” systems.
SampleRelative Component Intensity, %Concentration, at.%
O1O2O3OtotO1O2O3
Initial MWCNT/Ti6.779.613.75.210.354.140.72
MWCNT/Ti, irradiated for 10 min19.656.523.913.382.627.563.20
MWCNT/Ti, irradiated for 20 min19.851.828.414.932.957.744.24
MWCNT/Ti, irradiated for 30 min27.846.525.716.454.577.654.23
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Korusenko, P.M.; Knyazev, E.V.; Petrova, O.V.; Sokolov, D.V.; Povoroznyuk, S.N.; Ivlev, K.E.; Bakina, K.A.; Gaas, V.A.; Vinogradov, A.S. Improving the Adhesion of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes to Titanium by Irradiating the Interface with He+ Ions: Atomic Force Microscopy and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Study. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 699. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14080699

AMA Style

Korusenko PM, Knyazev EV, Petrova OV, Sokolov DV, Povoroznyuk SN, Ivlev KE, Bakina KA, Gaas VA, Vinogradov AS. Improving the Adhesion of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes to Titanium by Irradiating the Interface with He+ Ions: Atomic Force Microscopy and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Study. Nanomaterials. 2024; 14(8):699. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14080699

Chicago/Turabian Style

Korusenko, Petr M., Egor V. Knyazev, Olga V. Petrova, Denis V. Sokolov, Sergey N. Povoroznyuk, Konstantin E. Ivlev, Ksenia A. Bakina, Vyacheslav A. Gaas, and Alexander S. Vinogradov. 2024. "Improving the Adhesion of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes to Titanium by Irradiating the Interface with He+ Ions: Atomic Force Microscopy and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Study" Nanomaterials 14, no. 8: 699. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14080699

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop