Next Article in Journal
Nonbiodegradable Spiegelmer-Driven Colorimetric Biosensor for Bisphenol A Detection
Previous Article in Journal
Wearable Systems for Home Monitoring Healthcare: The Photoplethysmography Success Pros and Cons
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advances in Photoplethysmography for Personalized Cardiovascular Monitoring

1
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
2
Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2022, 12(10), 863; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12100863
Submission received: 28 September 2022 / Accepted: 10 October 2022 / Published: 12 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Intelligent Biosensors and Bio-Signal Processing)

Abstract

:
Photoplethysmography (PPG) is garnering substantial interest due to low cost, noninvasiveness, and its potential for diagnosing cardiovascular diseases, such as cardiomyopathy, heart failure, and arrhythmia. The signals obtained through PPG can yield information based on simple analyses, such as heart rate. In contrast, when accompanied by the complex analysis of sophisticated signals, valuable information, such as blood pressure, sympathetic nervous system activity, and heart rate variability, can be obtained. For a complex analysis, a better understanding of the sources of noise, which create limitations in the application of PPG, is needed to get reliable information to assess cardiovascular health. Therefore, this Special Issue handles literature about noises and how they affect the waveform of the PPG caused by individual variations (e.g., skin tone, obesity, age, and gender), physiology (e.g., respiration, venous pulsation, body site of measurement, and body temperature), and external factors (e.g., motion artifact, ambient light, and applied pressure to the skin). It also covers the issues that still need to be considered in each situation.

The continuous/intermittent monitoring system based on biosignals can deliver preventive treatment because it can measure abnormal body signals and obtain information such as disease therapy effects [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Photoplethysmography (PPG), which gets the biosignals related to blood flow with light-emitting diodes and photodetector, is one of the promising monitoring systems, since it enables the diagnosis of diseases directly related to human lives, such as information related to cardiovascular disease (CVD) [9,10,11,12,13]. CVD is a class of chronic conditions and the number one cause of death globally, contributing to more than 17 million deaths [14,15,16]. PPG is one of the noninvasive methods for diagnosing and monitoring these cardiovascular diseases. As it is a noninvasive method, an accurate analysis of the signal obtained from the photodetector is required.
The photodetector collects the transmitted or reflected light depending on the contraction and relaxation of the artery, and we can get the changes in blood flow by analyzing the electrical signals [17]. The periodically changing signals obtain pulsatile information, and changes in light transmittance show changes in erythrocyte orientation [18]. The PPG waveform, a periodic AC pulsatile component of electrical signals by removing the quasi-DC baseline component, has tremendous information to assess cardiovascular health. We can get (i) heart rate, stroke volume, and hypertension by PPG waveform, (ii) blood velocity by the first derivative, and (iii) vascular health and risk for cardiovascular disease by the second derivative [19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Despite the usefulness of these PPGs, the devices approved by U.S. Food and Drug Administration are limited because of the numerous sources of noise that can impede the output of the PPG [26]. For true health monitoring, these sources of noise and how they affect the waveform of the PPG and its derivatives should be resolved.
The PPG exhibits varied responses in the following conditions: (i) individual variations, (ii) physiological processes, and (iii) external environments. First, we will discuss the factors in the individual variations (e.g., skin tone, obesity, age, and gender) that affect the PPG characteristics. Although the PPG-emitted green light (wavelength: ~550 nm) is relatively insensitive to the melamine content, the PPG signals exhibit a low signal-to-noise ratio in a darker skin tone [27,28]. Obesity is also a primary factor for the PPG system because it can induce multiple changes in the subject’s metabolism (e.g., skin thickness, blood flow, capillary density, etc.) [29,30]. Furthermore, aging that influences the cardiovascular system, skin thickness, and degree of hydration may dampen the PPG resolution [31]. The waveform of the PPG signals can differ in response to the gender-associated physiological differences that involve blood pressure, heart mass, and average heart rate [32]. Therefore, to achieve a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), a more optimized PPG system should be established through data library and machine learning [33,34,35,36,37,38].
Next, physiological processes (e.g., respiration, venous pulsations, local body temperature, etc.) mainly affect the PPG waveform. For example, variations in respiratory characteristics produce significant changes in the PPG signals with different intensities, amplitude, and frequencies [39,40,41]. Likewise, venous pulsation yields periodical AC signals resulting from the blood volume changes, which is detrimental to accurate PPG measurement [42,43]. Local body temperature is also found to be positively proportional to the amplitude of the PPG signals [44,45]. Therefore, for precise analysis of the PPG signals, the baseline signals from the physiological processes need to be observed for the post-signal processing.
At last, external factors may modify the noise level of the PPG signals. For example, biomechanical motions with varied frequency ranges induce the fluctuation of the PPG signals [46]. Besides, previous studies state that ambient light limits the accuracy of the PPG measurements with the increased noise level [47]. Thus, these potential external factors need to be controlled and consistent to achieve a more reliable PPG measurement.
In this editorial we have discussed significant challenges to securing the accuracy of the PPG measurements according to the accepted topic. We look forward to advancing the PPG measurements resulting in a precise, personalized technique for the biosignal monitoring system. Moreover, benefiting from its low-power consumption feature, we suggest that energy harvesting technologies and flexible energy storage can be a promising solution for the energy source of PPG-integrated medical devices [48,49,50,51,52,53,54]. Thus, we expect the wearable PPG-based diagnostic system to provide an exceptional clinical experience to patients.

Funding

J.C. acknowledges the Hellman Fellows Research Grant and the BBRF Young Investigator Grant.

Acknowledgments

J.C. acknowledge the Henry Samueli School of Engineering & Applied Science and the Department of Bioengineering at the University of California, Los Angeles for the startup support, and the UCLA Pandemic Resources Program Research Award, and the Research Recovery Grant by the UCLA Academic Senate.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Meng, K.; Zhao, S.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, S.; He, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhou, Z.; Fan, W.; Tan, X.; et al. A Wireless Textile-Based Sensor System for Self-Powered Personalized Health Care. Matter 2020, 2, 896–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Xiao, X.; Yin, J.; Chen, G.; Shen, S.; Nashalian, A.; Chen, J. Bioinspired Acoustic Textiles with Nanoscale Vibrations for Wearable Biomonitoring. Matter 2022, 5, 1342–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, G.; Xiao, X.; Zhao, X.; Tat, T.; Bick, M.; Chen, J. Electronic Textiles for Wearable Point-of-Care Systems. Chem Rev 2022, 122, 3259–3291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, S.; Bick, M.; Xiao, X.; Chen, G.; Nashalian, A.; Chen, J. Leveraging Triboelectric Nanogenerators for Bioengineering. Matter 2021, 4, 845–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhao, X.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, J.; Chen, G.; Fang, Y.; Tat, T.; Xiao, X.; Song, Y.; Li, S.; Chen, J. Soft Fibers with Magnetoelasticity for Wearable Electronics. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Libanori, A.; Chen, G.; Zhao, X.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, J. Smart Textiles for Personalized Healthcare. Nat. Electron. 2022, 5, 142–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xiao, X.; Chen, G.; Libanori, A.; Chen, J. Wearable Triboelectric Nanogenerators for Therapeutics. Trends Chem. 2021, 3, 279–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhou, Z.; Chen, K.; Li, X.; Zhang, S.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Meng, K.; Sun, C.; He, Q.; Fan, W.; et al. Sign-to-Speech Translation Using Machine-Learning-Assisted Stretchable Sensor Arrays. Nat. Electron. 2020, 3, 571–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Elgendi, M.; Fletcher, R.; Liang, Y.; Howard, N.; Lovell, N.H.; Abbott, D.; Lim, K.; Ward, R. The Use of Photoplethysmography for Assessing Hypertension. Npj Digit. Med. 2019, 2, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Meng, K.; Xiao, X.; Liu, Z.; Shen, S.; Tat, T.; Wang, Z.; Lu, C.; Ding, W.; He, X.; Yang, J.; et al. Kirigami-Inspired Pressure Sensors for Wearable Dynamic Cardiovascular Monitoring. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2202478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kireev, D.; Sel, K.; Ibrahim, B.; Kumar, N.; Akbari, A.; Jafari, R.; Akinwande, D. Continuous Cuffless Monitoring of Arterial Blood Pressure via Graphene Bioimpedance Tattoos. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2022, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Meng, K.; Chen, J.; Li, X.; Wu, Y.; Fan, W.; Zhou, Z.; He, Q.; Wang, X.; Fan, X.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Flexible Weaving Constructed Self-Powered Pressure Sensor Enabling Continuous Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease and Measurement of Cuffless Blood Pressure. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1806388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, G.; Au, C.; Chen, J. Textile Triboelectric Nanogenerators for Wearable Pulse Wave Monitoring. Trends Biotechnol 2021, 39, 1078–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Meng, K.; Xiao, X.; Wei, W.; Chen, G.; Nashalian, A.; Shen, S.; Xiao, X.; Chen, J. Wearable Pressure Sensors for Pulse Wave Monitoring. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2109357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shen, S.; Xiao, X.; Xiao, X.; Chen, J. Wearable Triboelectric Nanogenerators for Heart Rate Monitoring. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 5871–5879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fang, Y.; Zou, Y.; Xu, J.; Chen, G.; Zhou, Y.; Deng, W.; Zhao, X.; Roustaei, M.; Hsiai, T.K.; Chen, J. Ambulatory Cardiovascular Monitoring Via a Machine-Learning-Assisted Textile Triboelectric Sensor. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2104178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Deng, W.; Zhou, Y.; Tat, T.; Xu, S.; Jin, H.; Li, W.; Chun, F.; Yan, C.; Yang, W.; Chen, J. A Perovskite-Based Photodetector with Enhanced Light Absorption, Heat Dissipation, and Humidity Stability. Adv. Photonics Res. 2021, 2, 2100123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lindberg, L.-G.; Oberg, P.A. Optical Properties of Blood in Motion. Opt Eng 1993, 32, 253–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Castaneda, D.; Esparza, A.; Ghamari, M.; Soltanpur, C.; Nazeran, H. A Review on Wearable Photoplethysmography Sensors and Their Potential Future Applications in Health Care. Int. J. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 4, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Fujita, D.; Suzuki, A. Evaluation of the Possible Use of PPG Waveform Features Measured at Low Sampling Rate. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 58361–58367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rajala, S.; Lindholm, H.; Taipalus, T. Comparison of Photoplethysmogram Measured from Wrist and Finger and the Effect of Measurement Location on Pulse Arrival Time. Physiol. Meas. 2018, 39, 075010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Uçar, M.K.; Bozkurt, M.R.; Bilgin, C.; Polat, K. Automatic Sleep Staging in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients Using Photoplethysmography, Heart Rate Variability Signal and Machine Learning Techniques. Neural Comput. Appl. 2018, 29, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Ward, R.; Elgendi, M. Hypertension Assessment via ECG and PPG Signals: An Evaluation Using MIMIC Database. Diagnostics 2018, 8, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Takazawa, K.; Tanaka, N.; Fujita, M.; Matsuoka, O.; Saiki, T.; Aikawa, M.; Tamura, S.; Ibukiyama, C. Assessment of Vasoactive Agents and Vascular Aging by the Second Derivative of Photoplethysmogram Waveform. Hypertension 1998, 32, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Elgendi, M.; Liang, Y.; Ward, R. Toward Generating More Diagnostic Features from Photoplethysmogram Waveforms. Diseases 2018, 6, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Fine, J.; Branan, K.L.; Rodriguez, A.J.; Boonya-ananta, T.; Ajmal; Ramella-Roman, J.C.; McShane, M.J.; Coté, G.L. Sources of Inaccuracy in Photoplethysmography for Continuous Cardiovascular Monitoring. Biosensors 2021, 11, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Thody, A.J.; Higgins, E.M.; Wakamatsu, K.; Ito, S.; Burchill, S.A.; Marks, J.M. Pheomelanin as Well as Eumelanin Is Present in Human Epidermis. J Investig. Dermatol. 1991, 97, 340–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Preejith, S.P.; Alex, A.; Joseph, J.; Sivaprakasam, M. Design, Development and Clinical Validation of a Wrist-Based Optical Heart Rate Monitor. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA), Benevento, Italy, 15–18 May 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gibney, M.A.; Arce, C.H.; Byron, K.J.; Hirsch, L.J. Skin and Subcutaneous Adipose Layer Thickness in Adults with Diabetes at Sites Used for Insulin Injections: Implications for Needle Length Recommendations. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2010, 26, 1519–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Limberg, J.K.; Morgan, B.J.; Schrage, W.G. Peripheral Blood Flow Regulation in Human Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome. Exerc. Sport Sci. R. 2016, 44, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Mulder, T.J.S.V.; de Koeijer, M.; Theeten, H.; Willems, D.; Damme, P.V.; Demolder, M.; Meyer, G.D.; Beyers, K.C.L.; Vankerckhoven, V. High Frequency Ultrasound to Assess Skin Thickness in Healthy Adults. Vaccine 2017, 35, 1810–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dao, H.; Kazin, R.A. Gender Differences in Skin: A Review of the Literature. Gend. Med. 2007, 4, 308–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xiao, X.; Fang, Y.; Xiao, X.; Xu, J.; Chen, J. Machine-Learning-Aided Self-Powered Assistive Physical Therapy Devices. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 18633–18646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Luo, Y.; Xiao, X.; Chen, J.; Li, Q.; Fu, H. Machine-Learning-Assisted Recognition on Bioinspired Soft Sensor Arrays. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 6734–6743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, G.; Fang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Tat, T.; Chen, J. Textiles for Learning Tactile Interactions. Nat. Electron. 2021, 4, 175–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fang, Y.; Xu, J.; Xiao, X.; Zou, Y.; Zhao, X.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, J. A Deep-Learning-Assisted On-Mask Sensor Network for Adaptive Respiratory Monitoring. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2200252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Guo, R.; Fang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Libanori, A.; Xiao, X.; Wan, D.; Cui, X.; Sang, S.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, H.; et al. Deep Learning Assisted Body Area Triboelectric Hydrogel Sensor Network for Infant Care. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2204803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lin, Z.; Zhang, G.; Xiao, X.; Au, C.; Zhou, Y.; Sun, C.; Zhou, Z.; Yan, R.; Fan, E.; Si, S.; et al. A Personalized Acoustic Interface for Wearable Human–Machine Interaction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2109430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Meredith, D.J.; Clifton, D.; Charlton, P.; Brooks, J.; Pugh, C.W.; Tarassenko, L. Photoplethysmographic Derivation of Respiratory Rate: A Review of Relevant Physiology. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 2011, 36, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Dehkordi, P.; Garde, A.; Molavi, B.; Ansermino, J.M.; Dumont, G.A. Extracting Instantaneous Respiratory Rate from Multiple Photoplethysmogram Respiratory-Induced Variations. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Addison, P.S.; Watson, J.N.; Mestek, M.L.; Mecca, R.S. Developing an Algorithm for Pulse Oximetry Derived Respiratory Rate (RRoxi): A Healthy Volunteer Study. J. Clin. Monit. Comp. 2012, 26, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Shelley, K.H.; Dickstein, M.; Shulman, S.M. The Detection of Peripheral Venous Pulsation Using the Pulse Oximeter as a Plethysmograph. J. Clin. Monit. 1993, 9, 283–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Alian, A.A.; Shelley, K.H. Photoplethysmography. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Anaesthesiol. 2014, 28, 395–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Allen, J. Photoplethysmography and Its Application in Clinical Physiological Measurement. Physiol. Meas. 2007, 28, R1–R39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Carter, S.A.; Tate, R.B. Value of Toe Pulse Waves in Addition to Systolic Pressures in the Assessment of the Severity of Peripheral Arterial Disease and Critical Limb Ischemia. J. Vasc. Surg. 1996, 24, 258–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Maeda, Y.; Sekine, M.; Tamura, T. Relationship Between Measurement Site and Motion Artifacts in Wearable Reflected Photoplethysmography. J. Med. Syst. 2011, 35, 969–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wong, A.; Pun, K.-P.; Zhang, Y.-T.; Hung, K. A Near-Infrared Heart Rate Measurement IC with Very Low Cutoff Frequency Using Current Steering Technique. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Regul. Pap. 2005, 52, 2642–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, G.; Li, Y.; Bick, M.; Chen, J. Smart Textiles for Electricity Generation. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 3668–3720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhao, X.; Nashalian, A.; Ock, I.W.; Popoli, S.; Xu, J.; Yin, J.; Tat, T.; Libanori, A.; Chen, G.; Zhou, Y.; et al. A Soft Magnetoelastic Generator for Wind Energy Harvesting. Adv. Mater. 2022, 2204238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhou, Y.; Xiao, X.; Chen, G.; Zhao, X.; Chen, J. Self-Powered Sensing Technologies for Human Metaverse Interfacing. Joule 2022, 6, 1381–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhou, Y.; Zhao, X.; Xu, J.; Fang, Y.; Chen, G.; Song, Y.; Li, S.; Chen, J. Giant Magnetoelastic Effect in Soft Systems for Bioelectronics. Nat. Mater. 2021, 20, 1670–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chen, G.; Zhao, X.; Andalib, S.; Xu, J.; Zhou, Y.; Tat, T.; Lin, K.; Chen, J. Discovering Giant Magnetoelasticity in Soft Matter for Electronic Textiles. Matter 2021, 4, 3725–3740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Xiao, X.; Xiao, X.; Zhou, Y.; Zhao, X.; Chen, G.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Lu, C.; Hu, M.; Nashalian, A.; et al. An Ultrathin Rechargeable Solid-State Zinc Ion Fiber Battery for Electronic Textiles. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabl3742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Deng, W.; Zhou, Y.; Libanori, A.; Chen, G.; Yang, W.; Chen, J. Piezoelectric Nanogenerators for Personalized Healthcare. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 3380–3435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, S.; Xiao, X.; Chen, J. Advances in Photoplethysmography for Personalized Cardiovascular Monitoring. Biosensors 2022, 12, 863. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12100863

AMA Style

Kim S, Xiao X, Chen J. Advances in Photoplethysmography for Personalized Cardiovascular Monitoring. Biosensors. 2022; 12(10):863. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12100863

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Seamin, Xiao Xiao, and Jun Chen. 2022. "Advances in Photoplethysmography for Personalized Cardiovascular Monitoring" Biosensors 12, no. 10: 863. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12100863

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop