Next Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Single-Molecule Sensors Based on STM Break Junction Measurements
Next Article in Special Issue
Electrochemical Biosensor for SARS-CoV-2 cDNA Detection Using AuPs-Modified 3D-Printed Graphene Electrodes
Previous Article in Journal
A Miniaturized Silicon Lab-on-Chip for Integrated PCR and Hybridization Microarray for High Multiplexing Nucleic Acids Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biosensors
Volume 12
Issue 8
10.3390/bios12080564
biosensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Portable Vertical Graphene@Au-Based Electrochemical Aptasensing Platform for Point-of-Care Testing of Tau Protein in the Blood

by
Yibiao Liu
1,
Xingyun Liu
2,
Mifang Li
1,
Qiong Liu
2,* and
Tailin Xu
2,*
1
Longgang District Central Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518116, China
2
School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2022, 12(8), 564; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12080564
Submission received: 11 July 2022 / Revised: 21 July 2022 / Accepted: 22 July 2022 / Published: 25 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Printed Electrochemical Biosensors)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a long-term neurodegenerative disease that poses a serious threat to human life and health. It is very important to develop a portable quantitative device for AD diagnosis and personal healthcare. Herein, we develop a portable electrochemical sensing platform for the point-of-care detection of AD biomarkers in the blood. Such a portable platform integrates nanoAu-modified vertical graphene (VG@Au) into a working electrode, which can significantly improve sensitivity and reduce detection limit due to the large specific surface, excellent electrical conductivity, high stability, and good biocompatibility. The tau protein, as an important factor in the course of AD, is selected as a key AD biomarker. The results show that the linear range of this sensing platform is 0.1 pg/mL to 1 ng/mL, with a detection limit of 0.034 pg/mL (S/N = 3), indicating that this portable sensing platform meets the demand for the detection of the tau protein in the blood. This work offers great potential for AD diagnosis and personal healthcare.

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD), one of the most prevalent neurodegenerative diseases, poses a serious threat to human life and health and is rapidly becoming one of the most expensive, lethal diseases in this century [1]. Until now, there is still no effective treatment for AD. Early diagnosis, early detection, and early intervention are a significant and effective strategy [1,2]. The tau protein, as a defining characteristic of AD, is recognized as an important biomarker of AD [3,4]. The quantitative determination of the tau protein in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of AD. However, the AD diagnosis based on CSF is limited to the trouble of obtaining CSF. The detection of the tau protein in easily accessible blood is a possible alternative method [1,5,6]. However, the concentration of tau protein in the blood is extremely low (~pg/mL and lies beyond the detection range of the classic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Therefore, it is essential to develop an ultrasensitive, noninvasive, and portable quantitative device for detecting tau protein in the blood.
So far, many detection methods have been developed for the detection of the tau protein, including surface plasmon resonance (SPR) [7,8], surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) [9], field-effect transistors [10,11], colorimetry [12], fluorescence [13,14], and electrochemistry [15,16,17]. Among these methods, a portable electrochemical biosensor has tremendous potential for home health monitoring and personal healthcare due to its easy miniaturization, high sensitivity, and low cost [18,19,20,21,22]. A portable biosensor can be particularly significant as home health monitoring and personal healthcare become more and more common during the COVID-19 pandemic [23,24]. In recent years, portable sensors have been widely used in the field of disease diagnosis [25,26,27], e.g., a commercial, portable blood glucometer for detecting blood glucose, portable smartphone-based devices for monitoring cardiovascular diseases [28], portable biosensors for coronavirus disease [29], and portable electrochemical biosensors for the early diagnosis of periodontal disease [30]. However, very few portable electrochemical sensing platforms are reported in the field of AD diagnosis [16,31].
In this work, a portable electrochemical aptasensing platform is developed for the point-of-care detection of tau protein in the blood. In this electrochemical sensing system, vertical graphene (VG) modified with nanoAu (VG@Au) is used as an electrode material because of its large specific surface area, excellent electrical conductivity, high carrier mobility, good chemical stability, and outstanding biocompatibility [32,33], which improves sensitivity and reduces detection limit. In addition, nanoAu is also used to bind with aptamer. As shown in Figure 1, the entire electrochemical aptasensing system consists of an electrochemical micro-workstation (control system, size: 2 cm × 1 cm × 0.5 cm), a paper-based three-electrode sensing system (size: 2 cm × 0.7 cm × 0.1 cm), and a smartphone (results output system). The electrochemical micro-workstation is used for signal control, which connects to the smartphone by Bluetooth. The result is shown in BioSYS APP. The internal structure of the electrochemical micro-workstation is displayed in Figure 1, and the detail is shown in our previous paper [16]. The DNA aptamer of the tau protein was immobilized on the surface of VG@Au by Au-S. When the tau protein binds with aptamer, the spatial structure of DNA aptamer changes, hindering the electron transfer on the electrode surface. During this process, the peak current of the differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) is reduced. The concentration of the tau protein could be determined by measuring the DPV peak current changes. This sensing platform exhibits a low detection limit of 0.034 pg/mL and a wide linear range of 0.1 pg/mL–1.0 ng/mL. This portable VG@Au-based electrochemical sensing platform shows tremendous potential for AD diagnosis at home and in personal healthcare.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Tau441 was purchased from Abcam Ltd. and stored at −20 °C. The DNA aptamer of tau protein (5′-SH-(CH2)6-CAGCACCGTCAACTGAATGGGTTGGCCGGGCAGCGGGGGGTAGGCTGGT GATGCGATGGAGATGT-3′) was synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) according to the reference [34], and stored at 4 °C. Human serum albumin (HSA), glucose (GLU), β-amyloid peptide (Aβ), potassium chloride (KCl), ascorbic acid (AA), potassium ferricyanide/ferrocyanide (K3[Fe(CN)6]/K4[Fe(CN)6]), mercaptoethylamine (MCH), and PBS buffer (pH = 7.4, 10 mM) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai, China). All chemicals were of analytical grade and used directly. Ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ·cm) was used in all experiments.

2.2. Apparatus

The morphology of VG and VG@Au was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, ThermoFisher, FEI Apreo S, Waltham, MA, USA). The cross-section view of VG@Au and elemental mapping analysis were characterized using high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (SEM, ThermoFisher, FEI Apreo S, Waltham, MA, USA). All the electrochemical measurements were performed by an electrochemical micro-workstation that was customized from Refresh AI Biosensor Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, China.

2.3. Preparation of VG@Au Electrode

The VG was prepared by chemical vapor deposition, and the paper-based VG electrode was customized from ShenzhenYickxin Technology R&D Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, China. Then, the nanoAu was modified on the surface of the VG by electrodeposition. The electrodeposition was processed in H2SO4 (0.5 M) containing 10 mM HAuCl4 at −1.8 V. The deposition time was 80 s.

2.4. Fabrication and Analytical Performace of Portable Sensing Platform

Firstly, the VG@Au electrode surface was rinsed with ultrapure water before modification, and then dried at room temperature. Secondly, the DNA aptamer of the tau protein (10 μM) was dropped onto the VG@Au electrode surface and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Then, mercaptoethylamine (MCH, 1 mM) was used to block non-specific binding sites. Finally, the 10 μL tau protein prepared with PBS buffer was dripped onto the electrode surface and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. After each step, the VG@Au electrode surface was rinsed three times with PBS buffer.
The determination of the tau protein was carried out by differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) using a three-electrode system. (The VG@Au electrode was used as the working electrode. An Ag/AgCl electrode was the reference electrode, and another VG electrode was used as the counter electrode.) The electrochemical assay was implemented by differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) in 5 mM K3(Fe(CN)6)/K4(Fe(CN)6) solution containing 0.1 M KCl. The scan range was taken from −0.2 V to 0.4 V with a scan rate of 0.10 V/s. When the different concentration of the tau protein bonded with the aptamer, the changing value of the peak current (ΔI) was recorded successively, which was used to calculate the concentration of the tau protein. The selectivity of this portable VG@Au-based electrochemical sensing platform was investigated by DPV in PBS buffer containing BSA, Aβ protein, and tau protein.

2.5. Detection of Clinical Serum Samples

Simply, DNA aptamer (10 mM) was dropped onto the surface of VG@Au and incubated for 1 h. Then, 20 μL sample (4 μL samples diluted with 16 μL PBS buffer) was added to the VG@Au electrode surface and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. During this process, the peak current changing value of DPV signals was recorded.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Preparation and Characterization of VG@Au

The VG was prepared by chemical vapor deposition, and the surface morphology is shown in Figure 2A,A’. Many lamellar structures were observed. The peak current of CV was about 8.9 μA, which demonstrates that VG has good electrical conduct performance. To further improve the electrical conductivity and electron transfer rate, the VG surface was modified with nanoAu by electrodeposition. The nanoAu content of the VG@Au electrode was optimized by regulating deposition time. As shown in Figure 2B,B’, when the deposition time was 20 s, some gold particles appeared on the surface of the graphene. As deposition time increased, a nanoflower structure consisting of many gold particles was observed (Figure 2C–F and 2C’–F’). According to the CVs in Figure 2A’’–F’’, the peak current increased with increasing deposition time. When the deposition time was 80 s, the peak current increased greatly compared to the VG electrode, reaching 41.1 μA. However, the peak current changed little with a further increase in deposition time. Therefore, we selected 80 s as the optimized deposition time.
In addition, a cross-section view morphology of VG@Au is shown in Figure 2G. We found that the nanoAu was mainly deposited in the middle-upper part of the VG. To further observe the distribution of gold, an energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) was performed, and the element distribution of C and Au is shown in Figure 2H–J, demonstrating that nanoAu was displayed mainly in the middle-upper part of the VG.

3.2. Fabrication and Analytical Performance of Portable Electrochemical Sensing Platform

The paper-based VG electrode was customized by Shenzhen Yickxin Technology R&D Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, China. Then, the VG electrode surface was modified with nanoAu by electrodeposition, and the electroactive area of VG@Au was evaluated. As shown in Figure 3A, the electroactive area of the VG@Au electrode was remarkably larger than that of the VG electrode and bare Au. Moreover, CVs at different scan rates were carried out, and the result showed that the peak current grew linearly as the square root of the scan rate increased, which indicated that it was a diffusion-limited process. (Figure 3B) The VG@Au-based electrochemical aptasensor was prepared by successive self-assembly steps. This process was assessed by DPV. Firstly, the DNA aptamer of the tau protein was immobilized on the electrode surface. After modifying the aptamer, the peak current of the DPV signal decreased, indicating that the aptamer was successfully modified on the VG@Au surface. (Figure 3D, line II) Secondly, MCH was used to block the nonspecific adsorption sites. (Figure 3D, line III) The peak current was further reduced. Finally, a different concentration of the tau protein was added to the electrode surface. During this period, the DPV signal was recorded. The quantification of the tau protein could be calculated by the changing value of the peak current.
To obtain better analytical performance, we optimized the concentration of aptamer. The result showed that the optimized concentration was 10 μM (Figure 3C). Under optimized conditions, the tau protein was quantitatively detected by the portable VG@Au electrochemical aptasensing platform according to the peak current variation of DPV signals (ΔI). The result indicated that the peak current was reduced, and ΔI increased as the tau protein concentration increased. The ΔI grew linearly as the logarithm of the tau protein concentration increased. (Figure 3E,F) The detection limit was 0.034 pg/mL. (S/N = 3), and the linear range was from 0.1 pg/mL to 1 ng/mL. The LOD was calculated by three times the standard deviation of the blank according to the reference. [29,30] Compared to previous reports, our developed portable electrochemical sensing platform exhibited excellent analytical performance. A comparison was shown in Table 1. This portable electrochemical aptasensing platform showed a lower LOD. The concentration of the tau protein is several picograms per milliliter in the blood. The detection limit of this sensor is 0.034 pg/mL, which meets the requirements for the detection of the tau protein in blood.

3.3. Selectivity and Stability

The selectivity and stability were also investigated. As shown in Figure 4A,B, when 10 pg/mL tau protein was added, the DPV signal decreased significantly. However, when 1000-fold AA, GLU, HAS, or Aβ were added, there as little change in DPV signals, indicating that this sensing system had an outstanding selectivity. What is more, the stability of this electrochemical sensing platform based on VG@Au was evaluated by multiple tests of 10 pg/mL tau protein, and the result is shown in Figure 4C. After 14 days, the ΔI remained above 90% of its original level, which demonstrated that this portable electrochemical aptasensing platform based on VG@Au had excellent stability.

3.4. Application of Portable Electrochemcial Aptasensing Platform in Clinical Samples

To verify the clinical value of this portable VG@Au-based electrochemical aptasensing platform, we detected three clinical samples and compared the results with the results from agent of Quanterix Co., Ltd. (Billerica, MA, USA) in China, which is a professional AD blood-testing company. As shown in Table 2, there was no significant difference between our results and that of the company. These results demonstrated that our designed portable VG@Au-based electrochemical sensing platform could be applied to the detection of the tau protein in clinical samples. In addition, this portable electrochemical aptasensing platform could transfer signals to a smartphone by Bluetooth, and the result appeared on smartphone APP for the user to see.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, a portable electrochemical aptasensing platform was developed for the point-of-care detection of tau protein in the blood. This portable platform consists of a VG@Au-based sensing system, an electrochemical micro-workstation, and a smartphone. The 3D structure of VG@Au exhibits a large specific surface, excellent electrical conductivity, high stability, and good biocompatibility, which significantly improved the sensitivity of the sensing system and reduced the detection limit. As a result, the detection limit of the portable VG@Au-based sensing platform was 0.034 pg/mL, which satisfies the demand for the detection of tau protein in the blood. The results of the test appeared on a smartphone APP for the user to see. This portable electrochemical sensing platform could be used for point-of-care tests of other biomarkers. In a follow-up work, we will use this sensing platform for detecting glucose and amyloid peptides. This work provides great potential for AD diagnosis in the home and for personal healthcare.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L. and X.L.; methodology, Y.L. and T.X.; validation, X.L.; formal analysis, Y.L.; investigation, Y.L.; resources, Q.L.; data curation, M.L. and Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.L.; writing—review and editing, Q.L.; visualization, Y.L.; supervision, T.X.; project administration, T.X.; funding acquisition, Q.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Longgang District Medical and Health Science and Technology Project (grant no. LGKCYLWS2021000003), Shenzhen Key Laboratory for Nano-Biosensing Technology (grant no. ZDSYS20210112161400001), and the Shenzhen Stability Support Plan (grant no. 20200806163622001). We thank the Instrumental Analysis Center of Shenzhen University (Xili Campus) for providing access to the instruments used in the experiments.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Longgang District Central Hospital of Shenzhen (protocol code 2021ECYJ048 and date of approval 2 September 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Scheltens, P.; de Strooper, B.; Kivipelto, M.; Holstege, H.; Chételat, G.; Teunissen, C.E.; Cummings, J.; van der Flier, W.M. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 2021, 397, 1577–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, Y.; Haber, A.; Preuss, C.; John, C.; Uyar, A.; Yang, H.S.; Logsdon, B.A.; Philip, V.; Karuturi, R.K.M.; Carter, G.W.; et al. Transfer learning-trained convolutional neural networks identify novel MRI biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease progression. Alzheimers Dement. 2021, 13, e12140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hanseeuw, B.J.; Betensky, R.A.; Jacobs, H.I.L.; Schultz, A.P.; Sepulcre, J.; Becker, J.A.; Cosio, D.M.O.; Farrell, M.; Quiroz, Y.T.; Mormino, E.C.; et al. Association of Amyloid and Tau With Cognition in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease: A Longitudinal Study. JAMA Neurol. 2019, 76, 915–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Limorenko, G.; Lashuel, H.A. Revisiting the grammar of Tau aggregation and pathology formation: How new insights from brain pathology are shaping how we study and target Tauopathies. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 513–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Moscoso, A.; Karikari, T.K.; Grothe, M.J.; Ashton, N.J.; Lantero-Rodriguez, J.; Snellman, A.; Zetterberg, H.; Blennow, K.; Schöll, M. CSF biomarkers and plasma p-tau181 as predictors of longitudinal tau accumulation: Implications for clinical trial design. Alzheimers Dement. 2022, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hu, S.; Yang, C.; Luo, H. Current trends in blood biomarker detection and imaging for Alzheimer’s disease. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 210, 114278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lisi, S.; Scarano, S.; Fedeli, S.; Pascale, E.; Cicchi, S.; Ravelet, C.; Peyrin, E.; Minunni, M. Toward sensitive immuno-based detection of tau protein by surface plasmon resonance coupled to carbon nanostructures as signal amplifiers. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 93, 289–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hanbi, K.; Uk, L.J.; Soohyun, K.; Sojin, S.; Jun, S.S. A nanoplasmonic Biosensor for Ultrasensitive detection of Alzheimer’s disease biomarker using a Chaotropic agent. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 595–602. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ma, H.; Liu, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, J.; Han, X.X.; Ozaki, Y.; Zhao, B. In-situ fingerprinting phosphorylated proteins via surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy: Single-site discrimination of Tau biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 171, 112748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dongsung, P.; Hyun, K.J.; Jin, K.H.; Dongtak, L.; David, S.L.; Sung, Y.D.; Seon, H.K. Multiplexed femtomolar detection of Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers in biofluids using a reduced graphene oxide field-effect transistor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 167, 112505. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sang, K.S.; Dongwoo, K.; Mijin, Y.; Gon, S.J.; Hyun, L.S. The role of graphene patterning in field-effect transistor sensors to detect the tau protein for Alzheimer’s disease: Simplifying the immobilization process and improving the performance of graphene-based immunosensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 192, 113519. [Google Scholar]
  12. Duan, C.; Jiao, J.; Zheng, J.; Li, D.; Ning, L.; Xiang, Y.; Li, G. Polyvalent Biotinylated Aptamer Scaffold for Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Tau Proteins. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 15162–15168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chan, H.-N.; Xu, D.; Ho, S.-L.; Wong, M.S.; Li, H.-W. Ultra-sensitive detection of protein biomarkers for diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 4012–4018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Li, Y.; Wang, K.; Zhou, K.; Guo, W.; Dai, B.; Liang, Y.; Dai, J.; Cui, M. Novel D-A-D based near-infrared probes for the detection of beta-amyloid and Tau fibrils in Alzheimer’s disease. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 8717–8720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Song, Y.; Xu, T.; Zhu, Q.; Zhang, X. Integrated individually electrochemical array for simultaneously detecting multiple Alzheimer’s biomarkers. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 162, 112253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, Y.; Huang, Z.; Xu, Q.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Q.; Xu, T. Portable electrochemical micro-workstation platform for simultaneous detection of multiple Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers. Microchim. Acta 2022, 189, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Javad, Z.; Zahra, K.; Khalil, A.; Mohammad, T.S.; Hossein, H.; Mohammd, D.N. Current progress in aptamer-based sensing tools for ultra-low level monitoring of Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 210, 114278. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sailapu, S.K.; Dutta, D.; Simon, A.T.; Ghosh, S.S.; Chattopadhyay, A. Smartphone controlled interactive portable device for theranostics in vitro. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 146, 111745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Brito-Pereira, R.; Ribeiro, C.; Lanceros-Méndez, S.; Cardoso, V.F. Biodegradable polymer-based microfluidic membranes for sustainable point-of-care devices. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 448, 137639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chennareddy, S.; Kalagara, R.; Smith, C.; Matsoukas, S.; Kellner, C.P. Abstract TP106: Diagnostic Capability Of An Emerging Portable Stroke Detection Device In Clinical Practice. Stroke 2022, 53, ATP106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Duan, C.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ding, K.; Geng, X.; Guan, Y. Portable instruments for on-site analysis of environmental samples. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2022, 154, 116653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, K.H.; Moon, D.; An, J.E.; Park, S.J.; Seo, S.E.; Ha, S.; Kim, J.; Kim, K.; Phyo, S.; Lee, J.; et al. Wireless portable bioelectronic nose device for multiplex monitoring toward food freshness/spoilage. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 215, 114551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gambhir, S.S.; Ge, T.J.; Vermesh, O.; Spitler, R.; Gold, G.E. Continuous health monitoring: An opportunity for precision health. Sci. Transl. Med. 2021, 13, eabe5383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. David, M.; Barnaghi, P.; Nilforooshan, R.; Rostill, H.; Soreq, E.; Sharp, D.J.; Scott, G. Home monitoring of vital signs and generation of alerts in a cohort of people living with dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 2022, 17, e055151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Che, Z.-Y.; Wang, X.-Y.; Ma, X.; Ding, S.-N. Bipolar electrochemiluminescence sensors: From signal amplification strategies to sensing formats. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 2021, 446, 214116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tu, J.; Torrente-Rodríguez, R.M.; Wang, M.; Gao, W. The Era of Digital Health: A Review of Portable and Wearable Affinity Biosensors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 30, 1906713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Azeredo, N.F.B.; Santos, M.S.F.; Sempionatto, J.R.; Wang, J.; Angnes, L. Screen-Printed Technologies Combined with Flow Analysis Techniques: Moving from Benchtop to Everywhere. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 250–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hu, J.; Cui, X.; Gong, Y.; Xu, X.; Gao, B.; Wen, T.; Lu, T.J.; Xu, F. Portable microfluidic and smartphone-based devices for monitoring of cardiovascular diseases at the point of care. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016, 34, 305–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cui, F.; Zhou, H.S. Diagnostic methods and potential portable biosensors for coronavirus disease 2019. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 165, 112349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Joe, C.; Lee, B.H.; Kim, S.H.; Ko, Y.; Gu, M.B. Aptamer duo-based portable electrochemical biosensors for early diagnosis of periodontal disease. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 199, 113884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Supraja, P.; Tripathy, S.; Singh, R.; Singh, V.; Chaudhury, G.; Singh, S.G. Towards point-of-care diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: Multi-analyte based portable chemiresistive platform for simultaneous detection of beta-amyloid (1-40) and (1-42) in plasma. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 186, 113294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zheng, W.; Zhao, X.; Fu, W. Review of Vertical Graphene and its Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 9561–9579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhou, F.; Shan, J.J.; Cui, L.Z.; Qi, Y.; Hu, J.Y.; Zhang, Y.F.; Liu, Z.F. Direct Plasma-Enhanced-Chemical-Vapor-Deposition Syntheses of Vertically Oriented Graphene Films on Functional Insulating Substrates for Wide-Range Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 2202026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Teng, I.T.; Li, X.; Yadikar, H.A.; Yang, Z.; Li, L.; Lyu, Y.; Pan, X.; Wang, K.K.; Tan, W. Identification and Characterization of DNA Aptamers Specific for Phosphorylation Epitopes of Tau Protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 14314–14323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Razzino, C.A.; Serafín, V.; Gamella, M.; Pedrero, M.; Montero-Calle, A.; Barderas, R.; Calero, M.; Lobo, A.O.; Yáñez-Sedeño, P.; Campuzano, S.; et al. An electrochemical immunosensor using gold nanoparticles-PAMAM-nanostructured screen-printed carbon electrodes for tau protein determination in plasma and brain tissues from Alzheimer patients. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 163, 112238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yola, B.B.; Karaman, C.; Özcan, N.; Atar, N.; Polat, I.; Yola, M.L. Electrochemical Tau Protein Immunosensor Based on MnS/GO/PANI and Magnetite-incorporated Gold Nanoparticles. Electroanal. 2022, 34, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tao, D.; Shui, B.; Gu, Y.; Cheng, J.; Zhang, W.; Jaffrezic-Renault, N.; Song, S.; Guo, Z. Development of a Label-Free Electrochemical Aptasensor for the Detection of Tau381 and its Preliminary Application in AD and Non-AD Patients’ Sera. Biosensors 2019, 9, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Hun, X.; Kong, X. An enzyme linked aptamer photoelectrochemical biosensor for Tau-381 protein using AuNPs/MoSe2 as sensing material. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2020, 192, 113666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biosensors 12 00564 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of electrochemical aptasensing platform based on VG@Au for detecting tau protein.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of electrochemical aptasensing platform based on VG@Au for detecting tau protein.
Biosensors 12 00564 g001
Biosensors 12 00564 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of deposition time on the morphology and electrochemical performance of VG@Au. SEM images of VGs modified with nano Au at different deposition time (A,A’) 0 s; (B,B’) 20 s; (C,C’) 40 s; (D,D’) 80 s; (E,E’) 120 s; (F,F’) 160 s. (A’’–F’’) are the corresponding CV curves of figure (A–F). The cross-section view morphology (G) and corresponding element distribution characterization (H–J) of VG@Au at deposition time of 80 s.
Figure 2. Effect of deposition time on the morphology and electrochemical performance of VG@Au. SEM images of VGs modified with nano Au at different deposition time (A,A’) 0 s; (B,B’) 20 s; (C,C’) 40 s; (D,D’) 80 s; (E,E’) 120 s; (F,F’) 160 s. (A’’–F’’) are the corresponding CV curves of figure (A–F). The cross-section view morphology (G) and corresponding element distribution characterization (H–J) of VG@Au at deposition time of 80 s.
Biosensors 12 00564 g002
Biosensors 12 00564 g003 550
Figure 3. The analytical performance of the portable VG@Au-based electrochemical aptasensing platform for point-of-care detection of tau protein. (A) A electro-active area comparison (CVs) of VG and VG@Au electrode in 5 mM (Fe(CN)6)3−/(Fe(CN)6)4− solution containing 0.1 M KCl at 0.01 V/s. (B) CVs of VG@Au electrode at different scan rates. The inset is the relationship between peak current and the square root of scan rate. (C)The optimization of DNA aptamer. (D) DPV signals of VG@Au (line I), VG@Au + aptamer (line II), VG@Au + aptamer + MCH (line III). (E) DPV signals of different concentration tau protein in 5 mM (Fe(CN)6)3−/(Fe(CN)6)4− solution containing 0.1 M KCl at 0.01 V/s. (F) The corresponding calibration curve of figure (E).
Figure 3. The analytical performance of the portable VG@Au-based electrochemical aptasensing platform for point-of-care detection of tau protein. (A) A electro-active area comparison (CVs) of VG and VG@Au electrode in 5 mM (Fe(CN)6)3−/(Fe(CN)6)4− solution containing 0.1 M KCl at 0.01 V/s. (B) CVs of VG@Au electrode at different scan rates. The inset is the relationship between peak current and the square root of scan rate. (C)The optimization of DNA aptamer. (D) DPV signals of VG@Au (line I), VG@Au + aptamer (line II), VG@Au + aptamer + MCH (line III). (E) DPV signals of different concentration tau protein in 5 mM (Fe(CN)6)3−/(Fe(CN)6)4− solution containing 0.1 M KCl at 0.01 V/s. (F) The corresponding calibration curve of figure (E).
Biosensors 12 00564 g003
Biosensors 12 00564 g004 550
Figure 4. The selectivity and stability of this sensor. (A) DPV signals of 10 pg/mL tau and 10 ng/mL AA, GLU, HSA and Aβ. (B) A comparison of this aptasensor response towards tau and interfering molecules. (C) The changing value (ΔI) of peak current for detecting 10 pg/mL tau at different times.
Figure 4. The selectivity and stability of this sensor. (A) DPV signals of 10 pg/mL tau and 10 ng/mL AA, GLU, HSA and Aβ. (B) A comparison of this aptasensor response towards tau and interfering molecules. (C) The changing value (ΔI) of peak current for detecting 10 pg/mL tau at different times.
Biosensors 12 00564 g004
Table
Table 1. A comparison between this electrochemical aptasensor and other methods for the detection of tau protein.
Table 1. A comparison between this electrochemical aptasensor and other methods for the detection of tau protein.
MethodsBiomarkersLODLinear RangeReferences
ElectrochemistryT-tau0.142 pg/mL0.1–1000 pg/mL [16]
ElectrochemistryT-tau0.059 pg/mL0.1–100 pg/mL [15]
Electrochemistrytau1.7 pg/mL0–2.5 ng/mL [35]
Electrochemistrytau0.46 pg/mL4.6 pg/mL–4.6 μg/mL [36]
ElectrochemistryTau38128 pg/mL40–4000 pg/mL [37]
FET sensorstau0.01 pg/mL10 fg/mL–1ng/mL [11]
FET sensorstau1.003 pg/mL0.1pg/mL–100 ng/mL [10]
PhotoelectrochemistryTau3810.013 pg/mL0–40 ng/mL [38]
FluorescenceTau4410.56 pg/mL0–46 pg/mL [13]
LSPRtau46 ng/mL23–575 ng/mL [7]
Electrochemistrytau0.034 pg/mL0.1 pg/mL–1 ng/mLThis work
Table
Table 2. Determination of tau in clinical samples and a comparison between our sensor and Quanterix Co., Ltd.
Table 2. Determination of tau in clinical samples and a comparison between our sensor and Quanterix Co., Ltd.
SampleBiomarkersThis Sensor (pg/mL)Quanterix Co. (pg/mL)Margin of Error
1tau2.19 ± 0.152.08 ± 0.08+5.29%
2tau4.12 ± 0.113.93 ± 0.12+4.83%
3tau4.28 ± 0.184.37 ± 0.09−2.06%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, M.; Liu, Q.; Xu, T. Portable Vertical Graphene@Au-Based Electrochemical Aptasensing Platform for Point-of-Care Testing of Tau Protein in the Blood. Biosensors 2022, 12, 564. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12080564

AMA Style

Liu Y, Liu X, Li M, Liu Q, Xu T. Portable Vertical Graphene@Au-Based Electrochemical Aptasensing Platform for Point-of-Care Testing of Tau Protein in the Blood. Biosensors. 2022; 12(8):564. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12080564

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yibiao, Xingyun Liu, Mifang Li, Qiong Liu, and Tailin Xu. 2022. "Portable Vertical Graphene@Au-Based Electrochemical Aptasensing Platform for Point-of-Care Testing of Tau Protein in the Blood" Biosensors 12, no. 8: 564. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12080564

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop