Next Article in Journal
Microfluidic Lab-on-a-Chip for Studies of Cell Migration under Spatial Confinement
Previous Article in Journal
Detection of S2 in Water by a Glucose Enhanced Water-Soluble Fluorescent Bioprobe
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Fluorescence-Based Measurements of Membrane-Bound Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 Activity Using Xenopus Laevis Oocytes

1
Department of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
2
Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2022, 12(8), 601; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12080601
Submission received: 1 July 2022 / Revised: 1 August 2022 / Accepted: 2 August 2022 / Published: 4 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Optical and Photonic Biosensors)

Abstract

:
Functional investigations of enzymes involving cellular expression systems are important for pharmacological studies. The precise control of expression is challenging in transiently transfected mammalian cell lines. Here, we explored the ability of Xenopus laevis oocytes to express a membrane-bound enzyme for functional characterization using standard 96-well plates and a fluorescence-based plate reader assay. We microinjected oocytes with cRNA encoding the angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and measured the enzymatic activity in single oocytes using a commercial fluorescence-based assay. The injected oocytes showed up to a 50-fold increase in fluorescence compared to uninjected oocytes. This fluorescence intensity was dose-dependent on the amount of ACE2 cRNA. These results suggest that Xenopus oocytes can be used for the functional evaluation of membrane-bound enzymes, decreasing the experimental workload.

1. Introduction

The experimental characterization of enzymatic activity may be performed using various methodologies, including spectrophotometry, calorimetry, chemiluminescence, radiometry, and chromatography [1,2,3]. The enzymes of interest can be purified from native tissues or expressed, e.g., in mammalian cell lines [4,5]. In vitro expression in mammalian cells is typically performed by transient transfection methods, such as lipofection or electroporation. These methods result in variable transfection efficiencies and require several pre-experimental steps [5,6].
In the present investigation, we evaluated Xenopus laevis oocytes as a heterologous enzyme expression system. Xenopus laevis oocytes have traditionally been used for the expression of electrogenic proteins, e.g., ion channels, which may be functionally studied using a two-electrode voltage clamp [7,8,9]. Compared to the transient transfection of mammalian cells, the oocyte expression system allows for the precise stoichiometric control of cRNA amounts and ratios, as oocytes are individually microinjected with cRNA [9]. Oocytes from Xenopus laevis have a full machinery for processing proteins, involving folding, post-translational modifications, and localization to the correct subcellular compartments. Previous studies indicate that Xenopus laevis oocytes display variable autofluorescence [10], potentially complicating the analysis of fluorescent intracellular assays. However, to our knowledge, the utility of Xenopus laevis oocytes in fluorescence-based assays remains largely unexplored.
Angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is the main extracellular target of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which mediates the initial step in the cellular infection [11]. The enzymatic reaction of ACE2 involves the degradation of the peptide angiotensin II into a smaller peptide consisting of the seven first N-terminal amino acids, Ang-(1–7) [12,13]. Here, we use a fluorescence-based assay developed for lysed cells or tissues to investigate whether oocyte-expressed ACE2 degrades its substrate extracellularly.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Molecular Biology

Human ACE2 (GenScript, Piscataway, NJ, USA) was cloned into the plasmid vector Xenopus oocyte or mammalian (pXOOM) [14]. The Xanthomonas badrii restriction enzyme (XbaI) was used to linearize the ACE2 plasmid in the presence of Buffer H (SuRE/Cut™, Roche, Switzerland). The linearized ACE2 was purified using the PureLink™ PCR Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The purified ACE2 was transcribed in vitro using the T7 mMessage mMachine kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA; see Figure 1 for an overview of the procedures). The linearization and in vitro transcription were performed at 37 °C. The RNA concentration and purity were determined using the Nanodrop 1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

2.2. Oocyte Preparation

Oocytes from the African clawed toad, Xenopus laevis, were surgically isolated as described previously [15]. The procedure conforms to Directive 2010/63/EU and has been approved by the Swedish National Board for Laboratory Animals and the Animal Welfare Ethical Committee in Stockholm (approval number N686/21). All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Following 24 h of incubation at 12 °C, oocytes were microinjected with 0.02–20.54 ng ACE2 cRNA using the Nanoject III (Drummond Scientific, Broomall, PA, USA) and a volume of 50 nL per oocyte (see Figure 1). The oocytes were then incubated for 6 days at 12 °C in atmospheric air.

2.3. ACE2 Activity Assay

The ACE2 Activity Assay was performed using the fluorometric Angiotensin II Converting Enzyme Activity Assay Kit (Abcam, Cambridge, UK; Cat. Ab273297). For the oocytes, 50 µL ACE2 Assay Buffer were added per well of a black-wall 96 well plate (Greiner Bio-One, Kremsmünster, Austria; Cat. 655090) in which one oocyte per well was transferred. After 15 min incubation at room temperature, 50 µL ACE2 substrate (diluted 1:25 in ACE2 Assay Buffer) were added per well. Fluorescence was measured in a kinetic mode (excitation and emission wavelengths at 320 and 420 nm, respectively) during 130 cycles (30 s cycle time), using the CLARIOstar® microplate reader (BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany). The experiments were performed at room temperature (22 °C).

2.4. Data Analysis and Statistics

Fluorescence data were analyzed with the CLARIOstar® MARS software (BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany). The slopes of all kinetic curves were calculated by fitting a straight line between the time points of 15 and 30 min of the enzymatic reaction. Statistical analysis was performed using Prism 6.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test and t-tests were used for statistical comparison. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

As a first step in evaluating the performance of the oocyte expression system and its signal-to-noise ratio, we used the ACE2 assay for uninjected oocytes derived from four batches. Single oocytes were placed in a 96-well plate, and the fluorometric activity was recorded every 30 s per well. Over a period of 70 min, stable baselines were observed for all batches (Figure 2A). To rule out that the injection itself influences the baseline (e.g., by damaging the oocyte membrane and causing leakage), we investigated the ACE2 activity using oocytes mock-injected with nuclease-free water. Mock-injected oocytes showed a slope of 23.4 relative fluorescence units per min (RFU/min; standard error of the mean [SEM] = 4.5 RFU/min, n = 12) that did not differ from the slopes of uninjected cells (27.4 RFU/min, SEM = 2.7 RFU/min, n = 42; p = 0.48, unpaired t-test; Figure 2B).
Having established the background conditions, we injected oocytes with increasing amounts of cRNA encoding ACE2. Lower amounts of ACE2 cRNA (0.02 and 0.21 ng) did not evoke a significant increase in the signal compared to the uninjected or mock-injected oocytes (ANOVA; Figure 2C,D; see inset). For larger amounts of cRNA, a significant increase in the signal is observed in the timespan of 15–30 min. The signal increased in a dose-dependent manner, reaching 1324 RFU/min (SEM = 132 RFU/min, n = 12) for oocytes injected with 20.54 ng of ACE2 cRNA (Figure 2D).

4. Discussion

We used Xenopus laevis oocytes as an enzyme expression system. The enzymatic activity in single oocytes was characterized using methods similar to fluorescent recordings of transfected mammalian cells. Compared to the expression when using transfection plasmids, which show great variability in transfection efficiency, the direct injection of cRNA reduces cell-to-cell variability (Figure 2D).
Moreover, with each oocyte considered as a separate replicate, the use of standard 96-well plates allows for a large number of biological replicates in one run. The most time-consuming part of the protocol is the injection of cRNA into oocytes. However, with an established pipeline, an oocyte can be injected using a microinjector in ~10 s or less, and automated injection methods are available [16].
For any kinetic assay, the signal-to-noise ratio impacts the resolution. Here, both uninjected and mock-injected oocytes show virtually no signal when compared to injected oocytes, as demonstrated in Figure 2D. Thus, the proposed protocol allows for both a high throughput and high resolution. Xenopus laevis oocytes may therefore be used as a quick, simple, and affordable system to express ACE2 and study how ligands affect ACE2 activity.
ACE2 is the main receptor for the SARS-CoV-2 virus and mediates the initial step in cellular infection [11]. The analysis of ligands modulating the interaction between the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 and ACE2 may thus help to further understand the entry of the virus into its host cells [17]. Xenopus laevis oocytes may be used as a swift, simple, and affordable system to express ACE2, which may be used to study how ligands affect ACE2 activity. For example, peptides mimicking motifs in the spike-protein of SARS-CoV-2 (and sequence variation thereof) could be tested in terms of their ability to affect ACE2 activity.
As shown here and by others, Xenopus laevis oocytes efficiently express many mammalian membrane-bound proteins [18]. However, in any particular case, glycosylation and other posttranslational modifications may differ between Xenopus laevis oocytes and mammalian cells. In each particular case, this may therefore need to be investigated in order to exclude differences impacting results.
In summary, Xenopus laevis oocytes express ACE2 in a dose-dependent manner, as measured by enzymatic activity using fluorescence intensity. Xenopus laevis oocytes are thus a valuable tool for studying membrane-bound enzymes.

Author Contributions

H.Z. conceived the idea, L.F. and R.Å. performed experiments, L.F., R.Å., and H.Z. analyzed the data, and L.F., R.Å., and H.Z. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

H.Z. is funded by the Swedish Research Council (Award No. 2021-03050). H.Z. is also supported by Emil och Wera Cornells Stiftelse, Stiftelsen Clas Groschinskys Minnesfond, Jeanssons Stiftelser, and Magnus Bergvalls stiftelse. R.Å. is supported by Stiftelsen Lars Hiertas Minne (grant numbers FO2020-0289 and FO2021-0400), Fredrik och Ingrid Thurings Stiftelse (grant numbers 2020-00625 and 2021-00683), Magnus Bergvalls stiftelse (grant numbers 2020-04055 and 2021-04489), and Åhlén-stiftelsen (grant number 213066).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal procedure conforms to Directive 2010/63/EU and has been approved by the Swedish National Board for Laboratory Animals and the Animal Welfare Ethical Committee in Stockholm (approval number N686/21). All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Reporting in the manuscript follows the recommendations in the ARRIVE guidelines.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Acknowledgments

We thank the technical staff of the animal facility.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. McDonald, A.G.; Boyce, S.; Tipton, K.F. ExplorEnz: The primary source of the IUBMB enzyme list. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, D593–D597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bisswanger, H. Enzyme assays. Perspect. Sci. 2014, 1, 41–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Ou, Y.; Wilson, R.E.; Weber, S.G. Methods of Measuring Enzyme Activity Ex Vivo and In Vivo. Ann. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2018, 11, 509–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Boland, M.J.; Hesselink, P.G.; Papamichael, N.; Hustedt, H. Extractive purification of enzymes from animal tissue using aqueous two phase systems: Pilot scale studies. J. Biotechnol. 1991, 19, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ooi, A.; Wong, A.; Esau, L.; Lemtiri-Chlieh, F.; Gehring, C. A Guide to Transient Expression of Membrane Proteins in HEK-293 Cells for Functional Characterization. Front. Physiol. 2016, 7, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Kim, T.K.; Eberwine, J.H. Mammalian cell transfection: The present and the future. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 397, 3173–3178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Dascal, N. The use of Xenopus oocytes for the study of ion channels. CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem. 1987, 22, 317–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ågren, R.; Århem, P.; Nilsson, J.; Sahlholm, K. The Beta-Arrestin-Biased Dopamine D2 Receptor Ligand, UNC9994, Is a Partial Agonist at G-Protein-Mediated Potassium Channel Activation. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018, 21, 1102–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Paucar, M.; Ågren, R.; Li, T.; Lissmats, S.; Bergendal, Å.; Weinberg, J.; Nilsson, D.; Savichetva, I.; Sahlholm, K.; Nilsson, J.; et al. V374A KCND3 Pathogenic Variant Associated with Paroxysmal Ataxia Exacerbations. Neurol. Genet. 2021, 7, e546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lee, E.E.L.; Bezanilla, F. Methodological improvements for fluorescence recordings in Xenopus laevis oocytes. J. Gen. Physiol. 2019, 151, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Yan, R.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Xia, L.; Guo, Y.; Zhou, Q. Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2. Science 2020, 367, 1444–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Vickers, C.; Hales, P.; Kaushik, V.; Dick, L.; Gavin, J.; Tang, J.; Godbout, K.; Parsons, T.; Baronas, E.; Hsieh, F.; et al. Hydrolysis of biological peptides by human angiotensin-converting enzyme-related carboxypeptidase. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 14838–14843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Rice, G.I.; Thomas, D.A.; Grant, P.J.; Turner, A.J.; Hooper, N.M. Evaluation of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), its homologue ACE2 and neprilysin in angiotensin peptide metabolism. Biochem. J. 2004, 383, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jespersen, T.; Grunnet, M.; Angelo, K.; Klaerke, D.A.; Olesen, S.P. Dual-function vector for protein expression in both mammalian cells and Xenopus laevis oocytes. Biotechniques 2002, 32, 536–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Sahlholm, K.; Barchad-Avitzur, O.; Marcellino, D.; Gomez-Soler, M.; Fuxe, K.; Ciruela, F.; Arhem, P. Agonist-specific voltage sensitivity at the dopamine D2S receptor--molecular determinants and relevance to therapeutic ligands. Neuropharmacology 2011, 61, 937–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Graf, S.F.; Madigou, T.; Li, R.; Chesné, C.; Stemmer, A.; Knapp, H.F. Fully automated microinjection system for Xenopus laevis oocytes with integrated sorting and collection. J. Lab. Autom. 2011, 16, 186–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Touret, F.; Gilles, M.; Barral, K.; Nougairède, A.; van Helden, J.; Decroly, E.; de Lamballerie, X.; Coutard, B. In vitro screening of a FDA approved chemical library reveals potential inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 replication. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Bröer, S. Xenopus laevis Oocytes. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 637, 295–310. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Overview of the methodology for fluorometric ACE2 activity measurements in Xenopus laevis oocytes. See Methods for detailed steps. The image was created with Biorender.com (accessed on 10 August 2021).
Figure 1. Overview of the methodology for fluorometric ACE2 activity measurements in Xenopus laevis oocytes. See Methods for detailed steps. The image was created with Biorender.com (accessed on 10 August 2021).
Biosensors 12 00601 g001
Figure 2. ACE2 activity in Xenopus laevis oocytes is dose-dependent on the amount of injected cRNA encoding the enzyme. (A) Fluorometric ACE2 activity (measured as slope between 15 and 30 min) in four batches of uninjected oocytes. Each dot represents a biological replicate (N = 6, 12, 12 and 12 oocytes per batch, respectively for batches 1–4). (B) Fluorometric ACE2 activity for all uninjected oocytes in (A) (slope = 27.4 ± 2.7 RFU/min, N = 42) and mock-injected oocytes (slope = 23.4 ± 4.5 RFU/min, N = 12). ACE2 activity does not differ between uninjected and mock-injected oocytes (p = 0.48, unpaired t-test). (C) Representative traces of ACE2 activity in uninjected, mock-injected, and ACE2 cRNA-injected oocytes (0.02–20.54 ng of cRNA). Inset (grey) shows the initial 10 min. (D) ACE2 activity in uninjected and injected oocytes (0.02–20.54 ng ACE2 cRNA). The number of oocytes was 42 for uninjected, 12 for 0.02, 0.21, and 20.54 ng, 25 for 0.69 ng, and 18 for 2.05 ng ACE2 cRNA. ***, p < 0.001 and ****, p < 0.0001 for ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. Horizontal bars indicate average values and error bars represent standard errors of the mean.
Figure 2. ACE2 activity in Xenopus laevis oocytes is dose-dependent on the amount of injected cRNA encoding the enzyme. (A) Fluorometric ACE2 activity (measured as slope between 15 and 30 min) in four batches of uninjected oocytes. Each dot represents a biological replicate (N = 6, 12, 12 and 12 oocytes per batch, respectively for batches 1–4). (B) Fluorometric ACE2 activity for all uninjected oocytes in (A) (slope = 27.4 ± 2.7 RFU/min, N = 42) and mock-injected oocytes (slope = 23.4 ± 4.5 RFU/min, N = 12). ACE2 activity does not differ between uninjected and mock-injected oocytes (p = 0.48, unpaired t-test). (C) Representative traces of ACE2 activity in uninjected, mock-injected, and ACE2 cRNA-injected oocytes (0.02–20.54 ng of cRNA). Inset (grey) shows the initial 10 min. (D) ACE2 activity in uninjected and injected oocytes (0.02–20.54 ng ACE2 cRNA). The number of oocytes was 42 for uninjected, 12 for 0.02, 0.21, and 20.54 ng, 25 for 0.69 ng, and 18 for 2.05 ng ACE2 cRNA. ***, p < 0.001 and ****, p < 0.0001 for ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. Horizontal bars indicate average values and error bars represent standard errors of the mean.
Biosensors 12 00601 g002aBiosensors 12 00601 g002b
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fast, L.; Ågren, R.; Zeberg, H. Fluorescence-Based Measurements of Membrane-Bound Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 Activity Using Xenopus Laevis Oocytes. Biosensors 2022, 12, 601. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12080601

AMA Style

Fast L, Ågren R, Zeberg H. Fluorescence-Based Measurements of Membrane-Bound Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 Activity Using Xenopus Laevis Oocytes. Biosensors. 2022; 12(8):601. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12080601

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fast, Luise, Richard Ågren, and Hugo Zeberg. 2022. "Fluorescence-Based Measurements of Membrane-Bound Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 Activity Using Xenopus Laevis Oocytes" Biosensors 12, no. 8: 601. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12080601

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop