Next Article in Journal
Optic Fiber Microsensor Reveals Specific Spatiotemporal Oxygen Uptake Profiles at the Mammalian Ocular Surface
Next Article in Special Issue
Trends in Paper-Based Sensing Devices for Clinical and Environmental Monitoring
Previous Article in Journal
An Innovative Polymer-Based Electrochemical Sensor Encrusted with Tb Nanoparticles for the Detection of Favipiravir: A Potential Antiviral Drug for the Treatment of COVID-19
Previous Article in Special Issue
Role of Estradiol Hormone in Human Life and Electrochemical Aptasensing of 17β-Estradiol: A Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biosensors
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/bios13020244
biosensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Fabrication of a Novel and Ultrasensitive Label-Free Electrochemical Aptasensor Based on Gold Nanostructure for Detection of Homocysteine

by
Reza Zaimbashi
1,
Somayeh Tajik
2,
Hadi Beitollahi
1,* and
Masoud Torkzadeh-Mahani
3
1
Environment Department, Institute of Science and High Technology and Environmental Sciences, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman 7631818356, Iran
2
Research Center of Tropical and Infectious Diseases, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman 7616913555, Iran
3
Biotechnology Department, Institute of Science and High Technology and Environmental Sciences, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman 7631818356, Iran
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2023, 13(2), 244; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13020244
Submission received: 2 December 2022 / Revised: 18 January 2023 / Accepted: 1 February 2023 / Published: 8 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Label and Label-Free Aptasensors)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The current attempt was made to detect the amino acid homocysteine (HMC) using an electrochemical aptasensor. A high-specificity HMC aptamer was used to fabricate an Au nanostructured/carbon paste electrode (Au-NS/CPE). HMC at high blood concentration (hyperhomocysteinemia) can be associated with endothelial cell damage leading to blood vessel inflammation, thereby possibly resulting in atherogenesis leading to ischemic damage. Our proposed protocol was to selectively immobilize the aptamer on the gate electrode with a high affinity to the HMC. The absence of a clear alteration in the current due to common interferants (methionine (Met) and cysteine (Cys)) indicated the high specificity of the sensor. The aptasensor was successful in sensing HMC ranging between 0.1 and 30 μM, with a narrow limit of detection (LOD) as low as 0.03 μM.

1. Introduction

Homocysteine, 2-amino-4-sulfanylbutanoic acid, or HMC is found in human blood as an essential amino acid that is not introduced via food sources but originates from methionine, where the Met present in food is converted to cysteine (Cys) through homocysteine (HMC). The reaction can reverse from HMC to Met; if the reaction stops at HMC, it cannot proceed to Cys and Met, so that the HMC concentration in biological systems may rise above the normal dose of 5–16 μM, which is called hyperhomocysteinemia. As a result, this phenomenon can be associated with many health risks, such as heart attack, osteoporosis, and pregnancy complications [1,2,3,4].
Various techniques were previously used to quantify HMC, some of which are HPLC, GC-MS, capillary electrophoresis, two-photon fluorescent chemosensors, LC-ESI-MS/MS, and LC/MS/MS [5,6,7,8,9,10]. This issue highlights the importance of biomolecule measurement. Therefore, much attention has been drawn to sensors and biosensors based on electrochemical approaches with praiseworthy features in terms of selectivity, sensitivity, portability, and reliability [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. Accordingly, it seems necessary to develop biosensors for quantitative determination of HMC in terms of avoiding health conditions.
There is evidence for the use of electrochemical approaches to determine HMC [39,40]. The result of such research in the last decade has been to reach an electrochemical detection platform based on aptamers (aptasensors). Reportedly, such a sensing system is an approach for the analysis of water and food specimens due to merits like low cost, green nature, and ease of use. For multiple electrochemical aptasensors, a structural alteration in the immobilized aptamer can occur due to interaction with the desired analytes, which changes the resistance of electron transfer between the electrode surface and redox active species. The sensors based on the electrochemical aptamer (EA), according to the molecular pathway of target-induced strand displacement (TISD), exhibit facile and effective systems in electrochemical platforms. The detection analytes used by such TISD-supported EA sensors are duplex probes consisting of electrode-immobilized aptamer-cDNA matrices. Hybridization of an aptamer sequence with its complementary DNA (cDNA) was engineered to obtain a duplex probe. When target molecules are present, the aptamer forms an aptamer-target complex, and the complementary strand of the aptamer-cDNA duplex is displaced, resulting in the TISD reaction at the sensor interface. On the one hand, it is possible to engineer duplex aptamer-cDNA probes based on facile base-pairing protocols for all aptamers. On the other hand, TISD detection can follow diverse electrochemical approaches for signal transduction. Therefore, TISD-supported EA sensors are developed to detect various targets, such as proteins, metal ions, and small organic substances [41,42,43,44,45,46].
The present attempt was made to integrate the merits of the above-mentioned substances and approaches to construct ultra-sensitive electrochemical sensors based on the modification of gold nanoparticles/carbon paste electrode surfaces with aptamers (AP/Au-NS/CPE). Based on the evidence, a facile fabrication of AP/Au-NS/CPE was successful in electrochemically biosensing the HMC. The suggested system is appreciable and reliable for electrochemically biosensing the HMC.

2. Experimental Procedure

2.1. Chemicals

The sequences of utilized oligonucleotides (Bio Basic Inc., Markham, ON, Canada) consisted of DNA, 5′SH-(CH2)6 ACCA GCAC ATTC GATT ATAC CAGC TTAT TCAA TTCA CAGC TATG TCCT ATAC CAGC TTAT TCAATT−3′ [47]. Citric acid, sodium hydroxide, acetic acid, phosphoric acid, acetone, and ethanol belonged to Merck. The 6-mercapto 1-hexanol and DL-homocysteine were from Sigma-Aldrich. The remaining chemicals were of reagent grade.

2.2. Equipment

The voltammetric analysis was performed by PGSTAT 302N Autolab potentiostat/galvanostat (the Netherlands). The conventional three-cell electrode system used contained a CPE work electrode, an Ag/AgCl reference electrode, and a platinum wire counter electrode. A Metrohm 713 pH meter was employed to measure pH values using a glass-reference electrode. To do DPVs, the CPE was placed in a constant concentration of HMC (5 mL) and 0.1 M PBS (0.1 M Na2HPO4–NaH2PO4 embarrassing 0.1 M NaCl, pH = 7.0) while stirring at ambient conditions. Following the PBS washing process, the CPE was positioned in a three-electrode system. The DPV determinations were performed in 0.1 M PBS (25 mL, pH 7.0) at ambient conditions.

2.3. Fabrication of CPE

To construct the CPE, graphite powder (0.5 g) was blended with nujol oil (0.3 mL) in a glassy mortar. After preparing the carbon paste, it was placed inside the electrode hole and smoothed with a filter paper to obtain a shiny appearance.

2.4. Modification of CPE Surface

The CPE surface was modified with Au-NS by immersing the electrode inside the gold solution (6 mM AuCl4 + 0.1 M KNO3) at −400 mV for 400 s (Au-NS/CPE). The Au-NS/CPE surface was coated with a 4.5 μM aptamer solution (5 μL). The electrode was subsequently kept vertically in a moist chamber overnight for self-assembly. As-prepared Au-NS/CPE was positioned in 1 mM 6-mercapto 1-hexanol within 60 min after washing with 0.1 M PBS (pH = 7.0) to limit common sites and to obtain the aptamer strands in straight coordination. The washing process for the electrode in each step was performed via PBS (25 mM, pH = 7.0).

2.5. Construction of Electrochemical Aptasensor

The label-free aptasensor developed to detect HMC contained a thiolated aptamer as its capture probe. Thus, the modification of rinsed Au-NS/CPE was performed by the thiolated aptamer through self-assembly. Subsequently, the electrode modified with aptamer was transferred into a 1 mM 6-mercapto 1-hexanol solution for 60 min. Now, the assembly interface was able to sense the HMC.

2.6. Homocysteine Determination

To this end, the aptamer-modified CPE (AP/CPE) was immersed in the HMC solution (2 mL) with variable PBS concentrations (0.1 M PB, 0.1 M NaCl, and pH = 7.0) for 60 min. After washing, the electrochemical detection was applied to agglomerated HMC in a 25 mL buffer (0.1 M PB, 0.1 M NaCl, and pH 7.0), exploiting the differential pulse voltammetry (DPV).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structure and Morphology

The FE-SEM images of Au-NS modified CPE at different magnifications are shown in Figure 1.

3.2. Experimental Optimization

The AP/Au-NS/CPE sensor was examined for its behaviors in terms of buffer concentration, aptamer concentration, type of buffer, and time of interaction, followed by their optimization in a solution containing HMC (0.1 μM).
Figure 2 illustrates that the current (0.1 µM HMC spiked in 0.1 M PBS (pH = 7.0)) increased along with the Apt concentration and arrived at a bottleneck at 4.5 μM, indicating that the aptasensor was approaching its saturation limit for the Apt concentration. Also, increasing aptamers further could lead to an increase in steric hindrance [48]. Thus, an Apt concentration of 4.5 μM was set as the optimal value.
Figure 3 shows the effect of interaction time (ranging from 25 to 105 min) on the HMC electrochemical signal (0.1 µM HMC spiked in 0.1 M PBS (pH = 7.0)). As shown in Figure 3, the current increased with the increasing of interaction time and reached the maximum current at 65 min. Therefore, 65 min was selected as the optimal interaction time. This trend indicated that the binding sites between aptamer and HMC were approximately saturated after 65 min [49].
In Figure 4, the impact of buffer type (citrate, phosphate, and acetate) on HMC detection was explored in solutions carrying 0.1 µM HMC. A sharp increase could be seen in the response of the electrode at 0.1 M PBS (pH = 7.0). Therefore, PBS was selected as the optimal buffer type.
The impact of PBS concentration (ranging from 0.02 to 0.2 M) on HMC detection was explored in solutions carrying 0.1 µM HMC spiked in PBS, the results of which are shown in Figure 5. A sharp increase could be seen in the electrode response at 0.1 M PBS. In fact, the concentration of electrolyte can affect the interaction of the aptamer and HMC, resulting in enhancement or reduction of the electrostatic interaction between the aptamer and HMC [49].
Under the optimized circumstances, the best accumulation time, the best buffer, and the best buffer concentration were selected to be 65 min, phosphate buffer, and 0.1 M phosphate buffer for future research.

3.3. Standard Curve and Limit of Detection

The standard curve of HMC determination was plotted using as-obtained AP/Au-NS/CPE under optimal circumstances. The solution HMC was detected by its oxidation peak on the modified electrode. Thus, the DPV was recorded for variable HMC concentrations (Figure 6). The peak currents of HMC oxidation on the modified electrode had a linear relationship with HMC concentrations that ranged between 0.1 and 30 μM. The limit of detection (LOD = 3σ) was estimated at 0.03 μM for HMC.

3.4. Real Sample Determination

The practical applicability of an aptasensor was explored by sensing HMC in real specimens of human urine and serum samples in accordance with the standard addition method. The preparation of biological specimens was carried out according to previous reports [50]. The results of the real sample analysis will be accurate when each sample is quickly centrifuged and refrigerated otherwise, glycolysis will increase the HMC content at ambient temperature. Therefore, human serum (1 mL) involves different levels of HMC after isolation of deposited proteins and filtering using a 0.45 μm Millipore filter and diluted with 1 mL of PBS (0.2 M PB, 0.2 M NaCl, pH = 7). Additionally, urine sample (1 mL) was dissolved in 1 mL of PBS for dilution. The urine specimens were refrigerated at 4 °C. Table 1 presents the results of real-sample analysis. Accordingly, the recovery rates were significantly acceptable for the spiked HMC detection, suggesting the appropriateness of the HMC aptasensor for sensing the HMC in biomatrices.

3.5. Comparison of As-Developed Homocysteine Aptasensor with Other Previously Introduced Electrochemical Approaches

A comparison was made for the HMC aptasensor components, by using available electrochemical approaches in terms of accuracy and validation. Clearly, the LOD ranges are better or more linearly proportional to those listed in Table 2. Further, the application of aptamers in the fabrication of the electrode simplifies the detection of the selectivity of the proposed protocol compared to the previous methods (Table 2).

4. Conclusions

The current attempt was made to detect the amino acid homocysteine (HMC) using an electrochemical sensor functionalized with aptamers (aptasensor). The proposed aptasensor was examined for its analytical performance under optimized circumstances. It was easy to use and cost-effective. We explored the influences of the concentration of buffer, concentration of aptamer, type of buffer, and time of interaction. The linear dynamic range at a working potential of 520 mV (versus Ag/AgCl) was from 0.1 to 30.0 µM under the optimized circumstances, with the limit of detection as narrow as 0.03 μM. Further, the practical applicability of the sensor was confirmed by sensing HMC in real biological specimens.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, R.Z. and S.T.; writing—original draft preparation, H.B. and M.T.-M.; writing—review and editing, R.Z., S.T., H.B. and M.T.-M.; supervision, H.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

All the data are presented in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Homocysteine Studies Collaboration. Homocysteine and risk of ischemic heart disease and stroke: A meta-analysis. JAMA 2002, 288, 2015–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rajaram, R.; Mathiyarasu, J. An electrochemical sensor for homocysteine detection using gold nanoparticle incorporated reduced graphene oxide. Colloids Surf. B 2018, 170, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhao, J.; Du, P.; Sun, X.; Liu, H. Development of Electrochemical Sensor for Homocysteine Determination as a Cerebrovascular Disease Biomarker. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2017, 12, 8642–8650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Refsum, H.; Nurk, E.; Smith, A.D.; Ueland, P.M.; Gjesdal, C.G.; Bjelland, I.; Tverdal, A.; Tell, G.S.; Nygård, O.; Vollset, S.E. The Hordaland Homocysteine Study: A community-based study of homocysteine, its determinants, and associations with disease. J. Nutr. 2006, 136, 1731S–1740S. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Concepción-Alvarez, A.; Camayd-Viera, I.; Nuevas-Paz, L. Validation of an HPLC method for total homocysteine quantification in plasma. Rev. del Lab. Clin. 2016, 9, 40–47. [Google Scholar]
  6. Pasas, S.A.; Lacher, N.A.; Davies, M.I.; Lunte, S.M. Detection of homocysteine by conventional and microchip capillary electrophoresis/electrochemistry. Electrophoresis 2002, 23, 759–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wrońska, M.; Chwatko, G.; Borowczyk, K.; Piechocka, J.; Kubalczyk, P.; Głowacki, R. Application of GC–MS technique for the determination of homocysteine thiolactone in human urine. J. Chromatogr. B 2018, 1099, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xia, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, G.; Yang, X.; Li, F.; Zhang, X.; Fang, M.; Yu, J.; Zhou, H. A highly selective two-photon fluorescent chemosensor for tracking homocysteine via situ reaction. Dyes Pigments 2018, 155, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Arora, B.; Narayanasamy, A.; Nirmal, J.; Halder, N.; Patnaik, S.; Ravi, A.K.; Velpandian, T. Development and validation of a LC–MS/MS method for homocysteine thiolactone in plasma and evaluation of its stability in plasma samples. J. Chromatogr. B 2014, 944, 49–54. [Google Scholar]
  10. Tomaiuolo, M.; Vecchione, G.; Margaglione, M.; Pisanelli, D.; Grandone, E. Stable-isotope dilution LC–ESI-MS/MS techniques for the quantification of total homocysteine in human plasma. J. Chromatogr. B 2009, 877, 3292–3299. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yunus, M.H.; Yusof, N.A.; Abdullah, J.; Sulaiman, Y.; Ahmad Raston, N.H.; Md Noor, S.S. Simultaneous Amperometric Aptasensor Based on Diazonium Grafted Screen-Printed Carbon Electrode for Detection of CFP10 and MPT64 Biomarkers for Early Tuberculosis Diagnosis. Biosensors 2022, 12, 996. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Tajik, S.; Beitollahi, H.; Garkani Nejad, F.; Kirlikovali, K.O.; Le, Q.V.; Jang, H.W.; Varma, R.S.; Farha, O.K.; Shokouhimehr, M. Recent electrochemical applications of metal–organic framework-based materials. Cryst. Growth Des. 2020, 20, 7034–7064. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mehdizadeh, Z.; Shahidi, S.; Ghorbani-HasanSaraei, A.; Limooei, M.; Bijad, M. ‘Monitoring of Amaranth in Drinking Samples using Voltammetric Amplified Electroanalytical Sensor’. Chem. Methodol. 2022, 6, 246–252. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xing, Y.; Li, G.; Deng, D.; Liu, L. Overview on the Design of Magnetically Assisted Electrochemical Biosensors. Biosensors 2022, 12, 954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Piri, F.; Merajoddin, M.; Piri, S.; Mokarian, Z. Synthesis WO3 nanoparticle via the electrochemical method and study its super-hydrophobicity properties. Asian J. Nanosci. Mater. 2021, 4, 240–245. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mazloum-Ardakani, M.; Taleat, Z.; Khoshroo, A.; Beitollahi, H.; Dehghani, H. Electrocatalytic oxidation and voltammetric determination of levodopa in the presence of carbidopa at the surface of a nanostructure based electrochemical sensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2012, 35, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Karimi-Maleh, H.; Karimi, F.; Orooji, Y.; Mansouri, G.; Razmjou, A.; Aygun, A.; Sen, F. A new nickel-based co-crystal complex electrocatalyst amplified by NiO dope Pt nanostructure hybrid; a highly sensitive approach for determination of cysteamine in the presence of serotonin. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 11699. [Google Scholar]
  18. Raoof, J.B.; Ojani, R.; Beitollahi, H.; Hosseinzadeh, R. Electrocatalytic Oxidation and Highly Selective Voltammetric Determination of L-Cysteine at the Surface of a 1-[4-(Ferrocenyl ethynyl)phenyl]-1-ethanone Modified Carbon Paste Electrode. Ana. Sci. 2006, 22, 1213–1220. [Google Scholar]
  19. Naik, T.S.K.; Mwaurah, M.M.; Swamy, B.K. Fabrication of poly (sudan III) modified carbon paste electrode sensor for dopamine: A voltammetric study. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2019, 834, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, L.; Yu, H.; Zhao, Q. The Characterization of Binding between Aptamer and Bisphenol A and Developing Electrochemical Aptasensors for Bisphenol A with Rationally Engineered Aptamers. Biosensors 2022, 12, 913. [Google Scholar]
  21. Beitollahi, H.; Tajik, S.; Dourandish, Z.; Garkani Nejad, F. Simple Preparation and Characterization of Hierarchical Flower-like NiCo2O4 Nanoplates: Applications for Sunset Yellow Electrochemical Analysis. Biosensors 2022, 12, 912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Shamsi, A.; Ahour, F. Electrochemical sensing of thioridazine in human serum samples using modified glassy carbon electrode. Adv. J. Chem. A 2021, 4, 22–31. [Google Scholar]
  23. Beitollahi, H.; Dourandish, Z.; Tajik, S.; Sharifi, F.; Mohammadzadeh Jahani, P. Electrochemical Sensor Based on Ni-Co Layered Double Hydroxide Hollow Nanostructures for Ultrasensitive Detection of Sumatriptan and Naproxen. Biosensors 2022, 12, 872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Karimi-Maleh, H.; Darabi, R.; Shabani-Nooshabadi, M.; Baghayeri, M.; Karimi, F.; Rouhi, J.; Alizadeh, M.; Karaman, O.; Vasseghian, Y.; Karaman, C. Determination of D&C Red 33 and Patent Blue V Azo dyes using an impressive electrochemical sensor based on carbon paste electrode modified with ZIF-8/g-C3N4/Co and ionic liquid in mouthwash and toothpaste as real samples. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2022, 162, 112907. [Google Scholar]
  25. Pourmadadi, M.; Yazdian, F.; Ghorbanian, S.; Shamsabadipour, A.; Khandel, E.; Rashedi, H.; Rahdar, A.; Díez-Pascual, A.M. Construction of Aptamer-Based Nanobiosensor for Breast Cancer Biomarkers Detection Utilizing g-C3N4/Magnetic Nano-Structure. Biosensors 2022, 12, 921. [Google Scholar]
  26. da Silva, W.; Ghica, M.E.; Ajayi, R.F.; Iwuoha, E.I.; Brett, C.M. Impedimetric sensor for tyramine based on gold nanoparticle doped-poly (8-anilino-1-naphthalene sulphonic acid) modified gold electrodes. Talanta 2019, 195, 604–612. [Google Scholar]
  27. Sengar, M.S.; Saxena, S.; Satsangee, S.P.; Jain, R. Silver nanoparticles decorated functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes modified screen printed sensor for voltammetric determination of butorphanol. J. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2021, 1, 95–108. [Google Scholar]
  28. Eren, T.; Atar, N.; Yola, M.L.; Karimi-Maleh, H. A sensitive molecularly imprinted polymer based quartz crystal microbalance nanosensor for selective determination of lovastatin in red yeast rice. Food Chem. 2015, 185, 430–436. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hosseini Fakhrabad, A.; Sanavi Khoshnood, R.; Abedi, M.R.; Ebrahimi, M. Fabrication a composite carbon paste electrodes (CPEs) modified with multi-wall carbon nano-tubes (MWCNTs/N, N-Bis (salicyliden)-1,3-propandiamine) for determination of lanthanum (III). Eurasian Chem. Commun. 2021, 3, 627–634. [Google Scholar]
  30. Joshi, P.; Mehtab, S.; Zaidi, M.G.H.; Tyagi, T.; Bisht, A. Development of polyindole/tungsten carbide nanocomposite-modified electrodes for electrochemical quantification of chlorpyrifos. J. Nanostruct. Chem. 2020, 10, 33–45. [Google Scholar]
  31. Karimi-Maleh, H.; Khataee, A.; Karimi, F.; Baghayeri, M.; Fu, L.; Rouhi, J.; Karaman, C.; Karaman, O.; Boukherroub, R. A green and sensitive guanine-based DNA biosensor for idarubicin anticancer monitoring in biological samples: A simple and fast strategy for control of health quality in chemotherapy procedure confirmed by docking investigation. Chemosphere 2022, 291, 132928. [Google Scholar]
  32. Poo-arporn, Y.; Pakapongpan, S.; Chanlek, N.; Poo-arporn, R.P. The development of disposable electrochemical sensor based on Fe3O4-doped reduced graphene oxide modified magnetic screen-printed electrode for ractopamine determination in pork sample. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 284, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Peyman, H.; Roshanfekr, H.; Babakhanian, A.; Jafari, H. PVC membrane electrode modified by lawson as synthetic derivative ionophore for determination of cadmium in alloy and wastewater. Chem. Methodol. 2021, 5, 446–453. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ismaeel, S.A.; Al-Bayati, Y.K. Determination of trace metformin in pharmaceutical preparation using molecularly imprinted polymer based pvc-membrane. Eurasian Chem. Commun. 2021, 3, 812–830. [Google Scholar]
  35. Khand, N.H.; Palabiyik, I.M.; Buledi, J.A.; Ameen, S.; Memon, A.F.; Ghumro, T.; Solangi, A.R. Functional Co3O4 nanostructure-based electrochemical sensor for direct determination of ascorbic acid in pharmaceutical samples. J. Nanostruct. Chem. 2021, 11, 455–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Karimi-Maleh, H.; Shojaei, A.F.; Tabatabaeian, K.; Karimi, F.; Shakeri, S.; Moradi, R. Simultaneous determination of 6-mercaptopruine, 6-thioguanine and dasatinib as three important anticancer drugs using nanostructure voltammetric sensor employing Pt/MWCNTs and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluoro phosphate. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 86, 879–884. [Google Scholar]
  37. Balasubramanian, P.; Balamurugan, T.S.T.; Chen, S.M.; Chen, T.W.; Lin, P.H. A novel, efficient electrochemical sensor for the detection of isoniazid based on the B/N doped mesoporous carbon modified electrode. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 283, 613–620. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hwang, J.H.; Wang, X.; Zhao, D.; Rex, M.M.; Cho, H.J.; Lee, W.H. A novel nanoporous bismuth electrode sensor for in situ heavy metal detection. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 298, 440–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lee, P.T.; Lowinsohn, D.; Compton, R.G. The selective electrochemical detection of homocysteine in the presence of glutathione, cysteine, and ascorbic acid using carbon electrodes. Analyst 2014, 139, 3755–3762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lee, P.T.; Lowinsohn, D.; Compton, R.G. The use of screen-printed electrodes in a proof of concept electrochemical estimation of homocysteine and glutathione in the presence of cysteine using catechol. Sensors 2014, 14, 10395–10411. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, K.; Liao, J.; Yang, X.; Zhao, M.; Chen, M.; Yao, W.; Tan, W.; Lan, X. A label-free aptasensor for highly sensitive detection of ATP and thrombin based on metal-enhanced PicoGreen fluorescence. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 63, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Wang, S.; Zhang, L.; Wan, S.; Cansiz, S.; Cui, C.; Liu, Y.; Cai, R.; Hong, C.; Teng, I.T.; Shi, M.; et al. Aptasensor with expanded nucleotide using DNA nanotetrahedra for electrochemical detection of cancerous exosomes. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 3943–3949. [Google Scholar]
  43. Huo, Y.; Qi, L.; Lv, X.J.; Lai, T.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.Q. A sensitive aptasensor for colorimetric detection of adenosine triphosphate based on the protective effect of ATP-aptamer complexes on unmodified gold nanoparticles. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 78, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Yu, Z.G.; Lai, R.Y. A reagentless and reusable electrochemical aptamer-based sensor for rapid detection of ampicillin in complex samples. Talanta 2018, 176, 619–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Somerson, J.; Plaxco, K.W. Electrochemical Aptamer-Based Sensors for Rapid Point-of-Use Monitoring of the Mycotoxin Ochratoxin A Directly in a Food Stream. Molecules 2018, 23, 912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Jia, L.P.; Zhao, R.N.; Wang, L.J.; Ma, R.N.; Zhang, W.; Shang, L.; Wang, H.S. Aptamer based electrochemical assay for protein kinase activity by coupling hybridization chain reaction. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 117, 690–695. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. McKeague, M.; Foster, A.; Miguel, Y.; Giamberardino, A.; Verdin, C.; Chan, J.Y.; DeRosa, M.C. Development of a DNA aptamer for direct and selective homocysteine detection in human serum. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 24415–24422. [Google Scholar]
  48. Peng, H.; Hui, Y.; Pu, M.; Yang, D.; Zhao, A.; Wang, W.; Wu, S.; Wang, B. Electrochemical aptasensor based on PEI-Fe-MOF/Au@ Ag NPs nanocomposites for streptomycin detection in dairy products. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2022, 116, 105091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rahmani, H.R.; Adabi, M.; Pooshang Bagheri, K.; Karim, G. Effect of processing variables on the performance of electrochemical aptasensor for determination of aflatoxin M1. Nanomed. Res. J. 2020, 5, 378–382. [Google Scholar]
  50. Sassolas, A.; Blum, L.J.; Leca-Bouvier, B.D. Electrochemical aptasensors. Electroanal. Int. J. Devoted Fundam. Pract. Asp. Electroanal. 2009, 21, 1237–1250. [Google Scholar]
  51. Gholami-Orimi, F.; Taleshi, F.; Biparva, P.; Karimi-Maleh, H.; Beitollahi, H.; Ebrahimi, H.R.; Shamshiri, M.; Bagheri, H.; Fouladgar, M.; Taherkhani, A. Voltammetric determination of homocysteine using multiwall carbon nanotube paste electrode in the presence of chlorpromazine as a mediator. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2012, 2012, 902184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Salehzadeh, H.; Mokhtari, B.; Nematollahi, D. Selective electrochemical determination of homocysteine in the presence of cysteine and glutathione. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 123, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Saeed, J.; Mirzaei, M.; Torkzadeh-Mahani, M. A selective and regenerable voltammetric aptasensor for determination of homocysteine. Microchim. Acta 2016, 183, 2205–2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hosseinzadeh, L.; Khoshroo, A.; Adib, K.; Rahimi-Nasrabadi, M.; Ahmadi, F. Determination of homocysteine using a dopamine-functionalized graphene composite. Microchem. J. 2021, 165, 106124. [Google Scholar]
  55. Wen, X.H.; Zhao, X.F.; Peng, B.F.; Yuan, K.P.; Li, X.X.; Zhu, L.Y.; Lu, H.L. Facile preparation of an electrochemical aptasensor based on Au NPs/graphene sponge for detection of homocysteine. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 556, 149735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biosensors 13 00244 g001 550
Figure 1. FE-SEM images of Au-NS modified CPE at different magnifications.
Figure 1. FE-SEM images of Au-NS modified CPE at different magnifications.
Biosensors 13 00244 g001
Biosensors 13 00244 g002 550
Figure 2. DPVs captured from Au-NS/CPE in PBS (0.1 M, pH = 7.0) with variable aptamer concentrations ((a) 0.5, (b) 1.5, (c) 2.5, (d) 3.5, (e) 4.5, (f) 5.5, and (g) 6.5 μM of aptamer). Inset: plot of peak current versus aptamer concentration, which ranged from 0.5 to 6.5 μM.
Figure 2. DPVs captured from Au-NS/CPE in PBS (0.1 M, pH = 7.0) with variable aptamer concentrations ((a) 0.5, (b) 1.5, (c) 2.5, (d) 3.5, (e) 4.5, (f) 5.5, and (g) 6.5 μM of aptamer). Inset: plot of peak current versus aptamer concentration, which ranged from 0.5 to 6.5 μM.
Biosensors 13 00244 g002
Biosensors 13 00244 g003 550
Figure 3. DPVs captured from AP/Au-NS/CPE with an aptamer concentration of 4.5 μM in PBS (0.1 M, pH = 7.0) and variable interaction times of the aptemer with homocysteine ((a) 25, (b) 35, (c) 65, (d) 95, and (e) 105 min). Inset: a plot of peak current versus interaction times ranged from 25 to 105 min.
Figure 3. DPVs captured from AP/Au-NS/CPE with an aptamer concentration of 4.5 μM in PBS (0.1 M, pH = 7.0) and variable interaction times of the aptemer with homocysteine ((a) 25, (b) 35, (c) 65, (d) 95, and (e) 105 min). Inset: a plot of peak current versus interaction times ranged from 25 to 105 min.
Biosensors 13 00244 g003
Biosensors 13 00244 g004 550
Figure 4. DPVs captured from AP/Au-NS/CPE with an aptamer concentration of 4.5 μM, interaction time of the aptemer with homocysteine of 65 min and various buffers. a–c: (a) acetate, (b) phosphate, and (c) citrate, sequentially. Inset: a plot of peak current versus various buffers.
Figure 4. DPVs captured from AP/Au-NS/CPE with an aptamer concentration of 4.5 μM, interaction time of the aptemer with homocysteine of 65 min and various buffers. a–c: (a) acetate, (b) phosphate, and (c) citrate, sequentially. Inset: a plot of peak current versus various buffers.
Biosensors 13 00244 g004
Biosensors 13 00244 g005 550
Figure 5. DPVs captured from AP/Au-NS/CPE with the aptamer concentration of 4.5 μM, interaction time of the aptemer with homocysteine of 65 min in PBS (pH 7.0) with variable phosphate buffer concentrations. a–c: (a) 0.02, (b) 0.05, (c) 0.1, (d) 0.15, and (e) 0.2 M, sequentially. Inset: plot of peak current versus variable phosphate buffer concentrations.
Figure 5. DPVs captured from AP/Au-NS/CPE with the aptamer concentration of 4.5 μM, interaction time of the aptemer with homocysteine of 65 min in PBS (pH 7.0) with variable phosphate buffer concentrations. a–c: (a) 0.02, (b) 0.05, (c) 0.1, (d) 0.15, and (e) 0.2 M, sequentially. Inset: plot of peak current versus variable phosphate buffer concentrations.
Biosensors 13 00244 g005
Biosensors 13 00244 g006 550
Figure 6. DPVs captured at the aptasensor for homocysteine at variable concentrations in PBS (0.1 M, pH = 7.0). No. 1–7: 0.1, 0.5, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, 20.0, and 30.0 µM of homocysteine. Inset: standard curve for homocysteine, plot of peak current versus homocysteine concentration.
Figure 6. DPVs captured at the aptasensor for homocysteine at variable concentrations in PBS (0.1 M, pH = 7.0). No. 1–7: 0.1, 0.5, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, 20.0, and 30.0 µM of homocysteine. Inset: standard curve for homocysteine, plot of peak current versus homocysteine concentration.
Biosensors 13 00244 g006
Table
Table 1. Homocysteine detection in human urine and serum matrices (n = 5 (the measurement of each concentration was repeated five times.)); all concentrations are in µM.
Table 1. Homocysteine detection in human urine and serum matrices (n = 5 (the measurement of each concentration was repeated five times.)); all concentrations are in µM.
SampleSpikedFoundRecovery (%)R.S.D. (%)
Urine00.7 (±0.02)-3.2
6.06.6 (±0.1)98.52.2
8.08.8 (±0.1)101.11.8
Human serum04.1 (±0.1)-2.6
4.08.4 (±0.1)103.71.9
5.09.0 (±0.3)98.93.2
Table
Table 2. Comparing the homocysteine aptasensor with existing electrochemical approaches previously reported for homocysteine detection.
Table 2. Comparing the homocysteine aptasensor with existing electrochemical approaches previously reported for homocysteine detection.
MethodLimit of Detection (LOD)linear Dynamic Range (LDR)Ref.
Voltammetry/Square wave voltammetry0.08 μM0.1–210.0 μM[51]
Voltammetry/Linear sweep voltammograms3.3 μM5.0–800.0 μM[52]
Voltammetry/Differential pulse voltammetry0.89 μM2.5–1000.0 μM[53]
Voltammetry/Differential pulse voltammetry0.15 μM0.5–900.0 μM[54]
Voltammetry/Differential pulse voltammetry1.0 μM1.0–100.0 μM[55]
Voltammetry/Differential pulse voltammetry0.03 μM0.1–30.0 μMThis work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zaimbashi, R.; Tajik, S.; Beitollahi, H.; Torkzadeh-Mahani, M. Fabrication of a Novel and Ultrasensitive Label-Free Electrochemical Aptasensor Based on Gold Nanostructure for Detection of Homocysteine. Biosensors 2023, 13, 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13020244

AMA Style

Zaimbashi R, Tajik S, Beitollahi H, Torkzadeh-Mahani M. Fabrication of a Novel and Ultrasensitive Label-Free Electrochemical Aptasensor Based on Gold Nanostructure for Detection of Homocysteine. Biosensors. 2023; 13(2):244. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13020244

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zaimbashi, Reza, Somayeh Tajik, Hadi Beitollahi, and Masoud Torkzadeh-Mahani. 2023. "Fabrication of a Novel and Ultrasensitive Label-Free Electrochemical Aptasensor Based on Gold Nanostructure for Detection of Homocysteine" Biosensors 13, no. 2: 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13020244

APA Style

Zaimbashi, R., Tajik, S., Beitollahi, H., & Torkzadeh-Mahani, M. (2023). Fabrication of a Novel and Ultrasensitive Label-Free Electrochemical Aptasensor Based on Gold Nanostructure for Detection of Homocysteine. Biosensors, 13(2), 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13020244

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop