Next Article in Journal
Characterizing the Impedance Properties of Dry E-Textile Electrodes Based on Contact Force and Perspiration
Previous Article in Journal
The Development and Evaluation of Reagentless Glucose Biosensors Using Dendritic Gold Nanostructures as a Promising Sensing Platform
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Novel Polyurethane-Based Polyion Complex Material with Tunable Selectivity against Interferents for Selective Dopamine Determination
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Enhanced Photosensitive Sensor Based on ITO/MWCNTs@Polymer Composite@BiVO4 for Quercetin Detection

1
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Sakarya University, Serdivan 54050, Türkiye
2
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak 67100, Türkiye
3
Biomaterials, Energy, Photocatalysis, Enzyme Technology, Nano & Advanced Materials, Additive Manufacturing, Environmental Applications and Sustainability Research & Development Group (BIOENAMS R&D Group), Sakarya University, Serdivan 54050, Türkiye
4
Department of Material Science & Nanotechnology, Faculty of Engineering, Uşak University, Uşak 64200, Türkiye
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2023, 13(7), 729; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13070729
Submission received: 24 May 2023 / Revised: 8 July 2023 / Accepted: 11 July 2023 / Published: 13 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Progress in Functional Polymers for Biosensors)

Abstract

:
The fact that antioxidants scavenge free radicals in the human body and naturally treat many health problems that will occur in this way has increased the consumption of antioxidant-containing foods. However, consumption of artificially prepared antioxidants could cause cancer. Therefore, antioxidants from natural sources are preferred. Quercetin is an antioxidant present in natural samples. In this article, multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), a polymer composite (PC) consisting of a mixture of 15% (by mass) polystyrene (PST), 15% (by mass) polyacrylonitrile (PAN) and 70% (by mass) polyindole (PIN), and semiconducting BiVO4 were used to prepare electrodes, and then a photosensitive ITO/MWCNTs@PC@BiVO4-based sensor was fabricated for quercetin detection. Quercetin was analyzed via the photosensitive ITO/MWCNTs@PC@BiVO4 sensor in 0.1 M phosphate buffered saline (pH 7.4) solutions including various quercetin concentrations. The constructed quercetin sensor displayed a wide linear response between 10 and 200 μM and a limit of detection of 0.133 μM. The developed photosensitive ITO/MWCNTs@PC@BiVO4 demonstrated a high sensitivity (442 µA mM−1 cm−2), good reproducibility (relative standard deviation 3.6%), high selectivity and long-term stability (>49 days) towards quercetin sensing. The photoelectrochemical sensor was then applied to detection of quercetin in black tea as a real-life sample. Our study could lead to the development of novel photosensitive PC polyphenol sensors.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Flavonoids, found in the fruits, leaves, bark and roots of various higher plants, as well as in vegetables, grains, spices, flowers and tea, etc., are plant polyphenols [1]. In literature, some benefits of flavonoids include antifungal, anticancer, anti-inflammatory and antiviral features [2]. Flavanols is the largest subgroup of flavonoids. As a member of the flavanol family, quercetin (3,3′,4′,5,7-pentahydroxylflavone) is found abundantly in vegetables such as onions, garlic and scallions, as well as cocoa, green tea, and tea [3]. Quercetin is a phenolic compound ingested in the daily diet and has potential benefits for human health. Quercetin was demonstrated to offer benefits in some enzyme systems and the steps of biological processes of various diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, inflammation etc. [4].
Techniques including high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [5,6], HPLC-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (MS/MS) [7,8], fluorescent methods [9,10,11], colorimetric techniques [12,13], chemiluminescent detection [14,15], biosensors [16,17], electrochemical- [18,19,20] and photoelectrochemical- [21,22] based sensors have been frequently used for quercetin analysis to date. Each of these techniques exhibit both superiorities and deficiencies. In recent years, the use of biosensors and sensors in quercetin analysis has increased due to the disadvantages of other techniques, such as the high cost of instrumental techniques (HPLC and HPLC–MS/MS), the difficulties in the application of fluorescent and chemiluminescent techniques, and low detection limits of colorimetric techniques at ~0.0033–0.0910 mM [12,13]. Electrochemical enzyme-based sensors have been applied to a wide field of study. However, these sensors have demonstrated disadvantages such as low stability, high cost, inability to operate below pH 2 and above pH 8, and decomposition at temperatures above 40 °C [23]. For this reason, scientists have been working intensively on non-enzymatic sensors in recent years. Although electrochemical techniques show features such as low detection limits (µM or nM level), photo-excited electrochemical techniques have attracted great attention of researchers for many years. Although photoelectrochemical techniques are a branch of electrochemistry and seem to be part of solar cells, their analytical applications also exist. Photoelectrochemical sensors are very sensitive due to the separation of photon excitation and detection [24]. In photoelectrochemical sensors, nano-conductive metal oxides are used as an effective photocatalyst due to their stability of about 400 s, selectivity, high sensitivity of 0.011 μA μM−1 cm−2, and low cost [23].
In many applications, polymeric materials that are chemically or molecularly inhomogeneous have been used in multi-component systems. Polymer nanocomposites have a wide range of new fillers that enhances the function and utility of polymers, while protecting the manufacturing and processing innate flexibility of thermosets, plastics, and resins. In particular polymer nanocomposites have been successful in terms of overcoming traditionally antagonistic combinations of features. Since the first reports in the early 1990s, [25,26,27,28,29] the term “polymer nanocomposite” has evolved to mean a multi-component system in which at least one dimension of the minor component is less than 100 nm and the major component is a polymer or a mixture thereof. Within the material class, conductive polymers have several characteristics including easy synthesis, macromolecular character, electrical handling properties, and being environmentally compatible. The design, synthesis, and modification of polymeric composites are becoming more and more important day by day, both in research and in the industrial area due to requests for applications in rechargeable batteries, sensors, electrochromic tools, anti-corrosion primer layers, and scaffolds for tissue engineering [30,31,32]. Polystyrene (PST) and polyacrylonitrile (PAN) are thermoplastic material compounds produced by homopolymerization of styrene (ST) and acrylonitrile (AN) that have the most important commercial applications in big requests due to their superior thermoplasticity, mechanical properties, dimensional stability, chemical and thermal stability, high resistance to alkalis and acids, craze resistance, stress resistance, easy processability, and a stress–strain behavior, which is comparable to the linear elastic/perfect-plastic materials [33,34]. PST and PAN are important industrial plastics and interesting candidates as components in the synthesis of conductive composites. Polyindole (PIN) is particularly promising for industrial applications because of its easy synthesis, high redox activity and higher conductivity. Unlike other conductive polymers, PIN may be synthesized by chemical oxidation of indole in different organic solvents [35]. In this study, a structure containing 15% polystyrene (PST), 15% polyacrylonitrile (PAN) and 70% polyindole (PIN) was used as a conductive polymer composite. Polystyrene (PST) and polyacrylonitrile (PAN) were chosen as an insulating matrix. PIN is used as a conducting matrix to facilitate electron transfer in the ternary composites due to its high conductivity [36]. In addition, the polymeric structures are frequently used as bonding agents between semiconductor materials due to their long-chain nature.
In the literature, there are studies on electrochemical and photoelectrochemical methods for the analysis of quercetin, and these studies are generally related to the use of sensors based on noble metal or metal oxide structures on a carbon support material. Therefore, in this study, a photoelectrochemical quercetin sensor was evolved by coating a conductive polymer composite (PST/PAN/PIN mixture denoted as PC) and photosensitive BiVO4 semiconductor on a new-generation, multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) support. In recent years, studies with carbon-based materials have received great attention due to their unique ability to detect small molecules such as glucose, dopamine, quercetin, urea and H2O2 [37,38,39]. In addition, MWCNTs are used both as a catalyst and as a support material. In photosensitive sensors, light-sensitive materials are generally used to increase the photocurrent. Among these materials, BiVO4 is used as a photosensitive material in the visible region due to its wide band gap, good stability and low toxicity. Light-sensitive sensor studies using BiVO4 structures in the literature have gained importance in recent years [40,41]. The materials used in this innovative non-enzymatic sensor structure were chosen for several reasons: the excellent conductivity (49.49 S/cm) and high electron mobility (~50,000 cm2 V−1 s−1) characteristics of MWCNTs; the PC’s ability to facilitate electron transmission and linker properties; and BiVO4’s good light-harvesting features. BiVO4 has a low band gap energy (∼2.3–2.4 eV) and the capacity to absorb most of the solar spectrum [42]. The MWCNTs’ structure used in this study is generally used in the analysis of compounds such as quercetin for electrochemical detection. In addition, the BiVO4 light-sensitive semiconductor structure used in this study has been used in applications such as photocatalysis and solar-driven water splitting in the literature. Due to its light-sensitive nature, BiVO4 has been used in sensor applications in the analysis of various organic structures before, but as far as we know, there is no study on quercetin analysis. In addition, it was observed in this study that a good electron transfer was achieved with the developed triple composite polymer structure and that there was a good connection between MWCNTs and BiVO4. For these reasons, our study, which consists of well-known materials in the literature, has a unique value due to its quercetin sensor, innovative composite polymeric structure, photosensitivity and explanation of the quercetin mechanism. MWCNTs, PC and BiVO4 were correspondingly coated on an indium tin oxide (ITO) glass substrate by a drop casting method. The synthesized nanostructures and fabricated sensor were characterized via X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), elemental mapping, energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), Mott–Schottky analysis, UV-Vis absorbance (UV-Vis) and diffused reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) techniques. Electrochemical impedance (Nyquist and Bode), amperometric (i-t) and linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) techniques were used for the electrochemical characterization of the quercetin sensor produced by correspondingly coating MWCNTs, PC and BiVO4 on an ITO substrate. The ITO/MWCNTs@PC@BiVO4 photosensitive sensors showed good selectivity, stability, low limit of detection (LOD) and broad linear response range for detecting quercetin. In addition, quercetin was analyzed in Turkish traditional tea (ÇAY) using the developed photoelectrochemical sensor.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

After removal of the hydroquinone inhibitor in styrene (ST-Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA) and in acrylonitrile (AN-Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA) monomers with a dilute potassium hydroxide solution, these monomers were used in the preparation of polystyrene (PST) and polyacrylonitrile (PAN). Indole (purity ≥ 99%) monomer was obtained from Merck Company, Germany. Benzoyl peroxide (C14H10O4; BPO) was utilized to initiate free radical polymerization of styrene and acrylonitrile monomers after being dissolved in chloroform and recrystallized via precipitation in methanol. Nitrogen was used to provide an inert atmosphere during the polymerization process. To remove impurities from the polymers, 1,4-dioxane was used for solubilization and ethanol for reprecipitation. Chloroform, 1,4-dioxane and ethanol were acquired from Merck Company, Germany and utilized in experimental studies without any purification.

2.2. Synthesis of Homopolymers of Styrene and Acrylonitrile

In our work, 8 g of styrene monomer and 8 g of acrylonitrile monomer were transferred into two separate polymerization tubes. Then, 1,4-dioxane was used to dissolve the monomers. Afterwards, 1% by mass (0.08 g) of the monomer C14H10O4 was used as the polymerization precursor at 70 °C. The polymerization medium was rendered inert through the use of nitrogen gas. The synthesized homopolymers were purified by dissolving in 1,4-dioxane three times and precipitating with ethyl alcohol to remove impurities. The obtained homopolymers were firstly dried in ambient conditions and then at 40 °C in a vacuum oven and kept in bottles for composite synthesis.

2.3. Synthesis of Ternary PST/PAN/PIN Conductive Polymer Composite

The reaction diagram of the synthesized ternary conductive PC (PST/PAN/PIN) is shown in Figure 1. The PST/PAN/PIN ternary PC was synthesized via the chemical oxidative polymerization method at 25 °C using the oxidant FeCl3. An oxidant-to-monomer mole ratio of 2:1 was used. In the first stage, 7.25 g of FeCl3 was dissolved in 30 mL chloroform in the reaction tube. In the next stage, 1.0 g of PST and 1.0 g of PAN were dissolved in 20 mL chloroform so that the total polymer mass was 2 g, and these were added to the oxidant solution mixed in the reaction tube. After the mixture in the reaction tube was stirred for 15 min, 2.62 g of indole monomer dissolved in chloroform was added dropwise to this mixture using a dropping funnel under N2 atmosphere at a fixed 25 °C reaction temperature. The product was separated by filtration from the reaction mixture, which was stirred for 30 h, and washed first with chloroform and then with hot distilled water. In the last stage, the obtained product was dried for 24 h at 45 °C in a vacuum oven.

2.4. Synthesis of BiVO4 Nanoparticles

In this work, 2.425 g Bi(NO3)3∙5H2O and 0.585 g NH4VO3 were dissolved in 40 mL ultrapure water and mixed for 30 min on a magnetic stirrer. Then, 1 M NaOH was added to bring this solution into the pH range of 10–12. This mixture was transferred into a Teflon-based hydrothermal vessel, heated to 180 °C and kept there for 18 h. The resulting product was washed several times with distilled water and methanol to eliminate impurities, and then dried at 80 °C in an oven overnight. The obtained BiVO4 nanoparticles (NPs) were characterized via XRD, FTIR and FE-SEM techniques.

2.5. Preparation of Electrodes

The photosensitive sensor was prepared by coating on ITO substrates. Firstly, the ITO electrode was cleaned in ultrapure water, acetone, ethanol/water (1:1) mixture and 0.1 M NaOH solution by sonication, respectively. Secondly, separately 2 mg/L BiVO4, 2 mg/L MWCNT and 2 mg/L PC were dispersed in methanol and vigorously stirred for 30 min for homogenization. Thirdly, 4 μL MWCNTs, 4 μL PC and 4 μL BiVO4 were correspondingly introduced to the ITO substrate, then dried under ambient conditions and kept in the dark. The constructed ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 electrode was used as a photosensitive sensor in the analysis of quercetin.

2.6. Characterization of Synthesized Materials and Prepared Photosensitive Sensors

The photocurrent measurements were performed under 150 W halogen lamp (tungsten halogen double-ended (J-type)) irradiation. XRD analysis was achieved by PANalytical–Empyrean X-ray diffractometer. FTIR analysis was performed by a Perkin Elmer Frontier FTIR spectrometry with ATR equipment. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed by a TGA/differential thermal analysis (DTA) device (Hitachi 7000). The Mott–Schottky measurements of prepared ITO-coated samples were analyzed using 0.1 M LiCO4 solution on a potentiostat/galvanostat/zero resistance ammeter (ZRA) (Gamry Interface 1000, Gamry Instruments, Warminster, PA, USA). The UV-Vis absorption and DRS spectroscopic measurements were obtained using a Schimadzu UV-2600 spectrometer. FE-SEM analysis was performed using a Philips XL30 SFEG microscope equipped with an EDS (INCA X-Max 80). All electrochemical analyses (linear sweep voltammetry (LSV), amperometry (i-t) and cyclic voltammetry (CV)) were conducted using a Gamry potentiostat/galvanostat/zero resistance ammeter (ZRA) in the presence of 0.1 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH = 7.4) under an N2 atmosphere. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) analyses, and the Nyquist and Bode plots, were performed under dark and light exposure at short-circuit bias superimposed by an AC voltage of 10 mV peak-to-peak amplitude over a 0.1–106 Hz frequency range.

3. Results

3.1. FTIR Spectra Analysis of PST, PAN, and Ternary PST/PAN/PIN Composite

In Figure 2, the FTIR spectra of the PST, PAN and ternary PST/PAN/PIN composite (PC) are presented. In the PST FTIR spectrum, characteristic absorption bands were observed at 3030–2900 and 1600–1450 cm−1 attributable to the C−H stretching vibration and the C=C stretching vibration of the benzene ring, respectively, and these have been previously reported for PST [43]. The bands at 2252 cm−1 and 1616 cm−1 were recorded as the main characteristic peaks corresponding to C≡N and C–C bonds in the FTIR spectrum of PAN. For the PC, the existence of peaks at 1444 cm−1 is attributed to C=C, 2252 cm−1 is related to C≡N, and 3390 cm−1 belongs to N−H stretching in the PIN unit.

3.2. Thermogravimetric Analysis of PST, PAN, PIN and Ternary PST/PAN/PIN Composite

The thermogram of the ternary PST/PAN/PIN composite produced via the chemical oxidative in situ polymerization method, analyzed from room temperature to 1000 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min, is given in Figure 3 together with the thermograms of PST, PAN and PIN. From the decomposition curve of the PST, it appears that the PST is stable above 270 °C. The PST decomposed up to 400 °C and the whole sample transformed into CO or CO2 gas, completed at 430 °C. This is a typical result of PST reported in the literature [44]. The TGA thermogram of the PAN illustrates two main decomposition steps. In the initial step, the degradation of PAN is in the range between 234 °C and 305 °C and in the second step is in the range of 305 °C and 420 °C. The total weight loss arises from the disappearance of volatile components such as CO, CO2 or NOx and the formation of cyclic compounds between the neighboring –CN groups [45]. Due to its heterocyclic ring structure, indole appears to be thermally stable up to 1000 °C. The thermal stability of the PC shows an intermediate behavior compared to individual PST, PAN, and PIN polymers. This situation is attributable to the new formations developed between molecules in the ternary composite structure. As seen from Figure 3, the thermal stability of the composite formed—due to the covalent bonds, pi-pi interactions and strong hydrogen bonds it contains—has increased compared to the individual polymers.

3.3. Composite Structure Characterizations

The XRD spectrum of BiVO4 NPs synthesized via the hydrothermal method is displayed in Figure 4A. The synthesized BiVO4 NPs have a monoclinic crystal structure and the XRD pattern is in agreement with that reported in the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) code 98-010-0605. The unit cell parameters of synthesized BiVO4 NPs, a, b, c, volume (V), space group are 7.234 Å, 11,702 Å, 5.093 Å, 310.01 Å3, I 12/c1, respectively. In addition, based on our previous work [46], the crystal size and microstrain of the BiVO4 NPs are estimated to be 26.16 nm and 0.526%, respectively. From the XRD spectrum, it is seen that BiVO4 does not contain impurities, and all the peaks are in a good harmony with the BiVO4 structure and hkl indices.
The FTIR spectra of the composite electrode consisting of MWCNTs, PC and BiVO4 and a mixture of these samples are given in Figure 4B. The peak seen at 747 cm−1 in the FTIR spectrum belongs to the BiVO4 NPs is due to the V-O bond [47]. In the FTIR spectrum of the PC, the large peak seen at 3500–3000 cm−1 is due to the –OH bond. In addition, the peaks seen in the 1700–700 cm−1 region belong to aromatic C-C, C-O, O-H bonds. The structures corresponding to the peaks seen at the wavenumbers specified in the FTIR spectrum of PC are as follows; aromatic C-C/C=C stretching mode (1607), aromatic CH2 ring vibration (1487), aromatic C-O-H in plane blending (1446), -OH and C-H stretching (1368), C-O stretching (1317), C-OH stretching and C-H in plane deformation (1107), O-CH3 and C-OH stretching (1063), C-O stretching (1036, 1014), C-H out of plane bending (928), ring out of plane C-H bending (802), C-H out of plane bending vibration (746), -OH bending (693) [48,49]. The y-axis expanded FTIR spectra of MWCNTs and the ternary composite electrode material are presented in the inset of Figure 4B. As seen from the FTIR spectrum of MWCNTs, the peaks at 2157, 2021 and 1570 cm−1 is due to C=C [50]. As examined the FTIR spectrum of the ternary composite electrode fabricated with BiVO4, PC and MWCNTs, the large peak of BiVO4 structure at 750 cm−1, the peaks of the PC structure in the 1700–1000 cm−1 region, and the MWCNT C=C peak regions are clearly seen.
The Mott–Schottky curves of the ITO/BiVO4, ITO/MWCNT, ITO/PC, and ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 composite electrode are shown in Figure 4C. In Mott–Schottky measurements, the flat band potential of the prepared electrode has been determined from the linear slope of the 1/C2 against V plot by employing the following equation;
1 C 2 = 2 q   N D   K   ε 0 A 2 V V f b k B T e
where, C2 is interfacial capacitance, A is an interfacial area, ND is the number of donors, V is the applied voltage, kB is Boltzmann’s constant, T is the absolute temperature and e is the electronic charge. The Vfb can be determined from the intercept of the V axis. The flat band potentials (Ef) for ITO/BiVO4, ITO/MWCNT and ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 were correspondingly estimated to be −0.114, 0.213, −0.447 V vs NHE. As can be seen from the Mott–Schottky spectrum of the ITO/PC structure, there are two different flat band potential values. The points where the curves in the dashed lines cut the x-axis (red dashed lines) in Figure 4C correspond to the flat band potentials of the polymer structure. With the help of the Mott–Schottky equation, the graph of 1/C2 against V shows two flat band potentials, n and p type, in the PC structure. This shows that the conductive polymer has p-n junction properties [51]. In terms of providing the interconnection between n type BiVO4 and p type MWCNT, the p-n connection feature of the conductive polymer structure makes a positive contribution to the sensor properties of the composite structure by reducing the resistance and increasing the conductivity, as it facilitates electron transmission. The p type and n type Ef values of conductive polymer were determined as 0.823 and −0.651 V against NHE, respectively. Additionally, the UV-Vis absorption spectra and DRS of the ITO/BiVO4, ITO/PC and ITO/MWCNT and ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 electrodes are shown in Figure 4D and Figure 5E, respectively. As seen in the UV-Vis absorbance spectra, the prepared structures absorb light in the visible region. In addition, it is seen that MWCNTs show strong absorbance in the UV region, whereas the absorbance of the BiVO4 is potent in the Vis region. Thus, the electrode components show a synergistic effect in the prepared composite electrode, indicating that both the UV region and the Vis region of the light will be strongly absorbed and the current properties of the sensor will be increased under light. In addition, DRS analyses of the prepared structures were performed and band gap values were calculated with the help of the Kubelka–Munk function. The Kubelka–Munk function was used to identify the optical band gap (Eg) as follows [52,53];
F   R = ( 1 R ) 2 2 R = K s
where, F (R), R, K and s correspondingly represents the Kubelka–Munk function, reflectance, absorption and scattering coefficient. The Kubelka–Munk plots ([F(R)hν]2 versus photon energy (hν)) calculated from the reflectance spectra in Figure 4E are shown in Figure 4F. Eg was estimated by the abscissa intercept of the tangent to the rising segment of the plot. The Eg values of ITO/BiVO4, ITO/MWCNT, ITO/PC, and ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 electrodes are correspondingly 2.39, 1.86, 1.84 and 3.47 eV, as illustrated in Figure 4F. Unexpectedly, the band gap value of the composite electrode was higher than the single electrodes. The main reason for this is thought to be due to the fact that n type BiVO4, p type MWCNT and p-n junction PC electrode are conjugated in the form of p-n-p-n. Band gap values calculated for single electrodes are in good agreement with literature data [54,55]. Valence band potential (Ev) values of electrodes can be estimated by subtracting the Ef values obtained from Mott–Schottky curves from the Eg values calculated via the Kubelka–Munk function. The calculated Ev values for ITO/BiVO4, ITO/MWCNT, ITO/PC, and ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 electrodes are correspondingly −6.453, −5.432, −6.676 and −7.423 eV. In particular, the low Ev value of the prepared composite electrode led to the low energy value.
The energy diagram of the movements of electron and hole pairs in the developed sensor is shown in detail in Figure 5. Quercetin exposed to sunlight turns into quercetin-on quinone by donating electrons, and the released electrons flow over the flat band of BiVO4 semiconductor and then through PC and MWCNTs. In the BiVO4 structure, released electrons move through two different pathways. The main reason for this is that the synthesized PC structure behaves like a p-n junction. Electrons released in path I pass to the HOMO energy level of the PC, then pass to the flat band of the MWCNTs, and then flow through the external circuit and form an electrochemical signal. In pathway II, the oscillating electrons in the conduction band of BiVO4 pass into the LUMO energy band of the PC and then pass into the flat band of the MWCNTs, producing an electrochemical response. Holes (h+) formed due to electron movement move from the MWCNTs valence band to the PC valence band and then to the BiVO4 valence band. In particular, the synthesized PCs acting as a p-n junction allows for increased electron movement and improved sensor properties. In addition, it is clearly seen that the used BiVO4 NPs are light-sensitive due to their band properties [40,41,42]. The scheme shows that this new generation ITO/MWCNTs@PC@BiVO4 sensor developed should be effective in the quercetin analysis.
The field-emission scanning electron micrograph of synthesized BiVO4 NPs is shown in Figure 6A. BiVO4 NPs with a tetrahedral structure have a diameter range of 50–100 nm. In addition, the field-emission scanning electron micrographs of the electrode composite (MWCNTs@PC@BiVO4) are displayed in Figure 6B. The fiber-like structure that can be seen in the micrograph in Figure 6B belongs to MWCNTs, tetragonal structures to BiVO4 NPs, and small spherical structures to the polymer. The average particle size of the PC is 10–50 nm, and the MWCNT structure is 1–3 nm in diameter and 300–500 nm in length. In addition, the EDX spectrum of the electrode composite (Figure 6C) shows the elements that make up the composite and their combinations. The EDX spectrum also shows that the prepared electrode composite does not contain any impurities. In addition, the atomic and mass ratios of the atoms that make up the composite are shown in the inset of Figure 6C. Considering the atomic ratios, Bi and V elements originate from the BiVO4 NPs structure, and N from the PC. The C and O elements originate from the MWCNTs, PC and BiVO4 structure. Elemental mapping images of the prepared MWCNTs@PC@BiVO4 composite electrode are displayed in Figure 7. As seen in the elemental mapping images, each element is uniformly distributed in the composite electrode. It is observed that the N atoms, where the Bi and V elements are distributed together, are also less dense elementally than the other compounds and are distributed on the general composite.

3.4. Light Sensitive Sensor Applications

A photosensitive quercetin sensor was constructed using MWCNT, conductive PC and BiVO4 NPs. In the first stage, the photosensitivity of these materials was determined by taking the LSV curves of the coatings on ITO glass. As depicted in Figure 8A, linear sweep voltammograms of 100 µM quercetin show various electrode composites on an ITO glass in 0.1 M PBS as a supporting electrolyte. The current increased sharply from 0.15 µA to 0.8 µA after BiVO4 coating in composite systems due to the stimulation of the quercetin structure at −0.85 V, thus also increasing the quercetin-sensing capacity of the electrode. The visible light-mediated activity of the composite electrode can be attributed to the photoactive nature of BiVO4. In contrast to BiVO4, a very weak current increase (~5%) was observed for MWCNT and conductive PC electrodes. In addition, it was determined as −0.85 V operating voltage, which gives the highest current value (0.82 µA) from the LSV curves. After the operating voltage was determined, the photocurrent response (i-t) curves of the same substances were taken (Figure 8B), and it was seen that the current in BiVO4 NPs increases significantly from 0.27 to 0.82 µA depending on the light at the voltage determined as −0.85 V. Since conductive polymers are known to accelerate electron conduction in their located systems [10], in this study, PC was used to improve electron transfer between BiVO4 and MWCNT structures due to its high electronic mobility (~1000 cm2 V−1 s−1). In addition, the PC has been used to help MWCNTs and BiVO4 NPs bond together, thereby increasing the durability of BiVO4 NPs at the electrode surface. Dark and light electrochemical impedance curves and conductivity properties of the samples coated on the ITO glass were analyzed. Nyquist plots of 100 µM quercetin at the prepared electrode composite on ITO in 0.1 M PBS as supporting electrolyte at the light exposure are shown in Figure 8C. As examined the Nyquist curves, it is seen that the ITO electrode exhibits low resistance (17.44 Ω). RS generally denotes the solution resistance and is estimated by the starting point x axis of the Nyquist plot; RCT, the charge transfer resistance of the redox species used in the experiment at the electrode/electrolyte interface, which is calculated by the semicircle resistance minus RS; Cμ the capacitive phase element (including the double-layer capacitance and electrode inhomogeneity) and is calculated from fitted curves of the Zview program [56,57]. The fmax is the maximum frequency point of prepared composites and is obtained from Bode plots. Calculated electrochemical impedance values are shown in Table 1. As the calculated electrochemical impedance values show, it is seen that while the RCT resistance increases significantly from 17.44 to 104.84 Ω with the coating of MWCNT on ITO, the resistance decreases greatly to 66.13 Ω value with the coating of PC on ITO/MWCNT. Among the prepared electrodes, the ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 electrode had the lowest resistance value of 60.75 Ω under the light. This indicates that the conductivity behavior of the prepared composite structure increases with light. In addition, as observed in the Bode-type curves (Figure 8D), the ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 structure has the lowest fmax value. The lowest fmax value is used in the calculation of electron lifetime (τe) passing through the sensor. While the electron lifetime is calculated with Equation (2), the diffusion time (τd) value can be calculated with the help of Equation (3) by using the RCT and Cµ values obtained from the Nyquist curves [57].
τe = 1/(2 π fmax)
τd = RCT × Cµ
The τe and τd values calculated via Equations (2) and (3) are given in Table 1. Notably, the conductivity and electron mobility respectively increased by 20.03% and 1,45% after both MWCNTs and PC were secured on the electrode, compared to ITO/MWCNTs. Relative to ITO/MWCNT@PC, τe has increased by 282% after BiVO4 NPs were included on the electrode. As τe is a feature that represents the movement of the electron in the circuit along the circuit, it is a parameter that will aid in enhancing the conductivity of the sensor. Similarly, τd for ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 structure is the highest compared to all other electrodes. The main reason for this is every additional component added to the structure affects the cut-off time. When both τe and τd values are evaluated together, it is seen that they have an effect on increasing electrochemical conductivity under light. It can be said that especially BiVO4 NPs in the sensor structure increase electron movement and electron capture due to their photosensitive nature. The equivalent circuit model of the fabricated composite ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 electrode is shown in Figure 8E. This model was obtained by simulating the Zview program. In this model, RS, RCT, ZW and Cμ represent the layer resistance, the ITO/electrode surface charge transfer resistance, the Wargburg impedance value of the ion diffusion, and the capacitive phase element values, respectively. Dark mode impedance results are depicted in Figure 8F. These curves also show similar properties with the impedance results obtained under light. It is seen that the resistance values are lower for the measurements taken under light, whereas the dark impedance measurement results show higher resistance values. Similarly, it is observed that the ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 electrode exhibits lower resistance in the dark Nyquist curve than the other electrodes. It should be noted that the resistance of the ITO electrode, which is not coated with any material, is approximately 55% lower than the ITO/MWCNTs@PC@BiVO4 electrode.
Time-dependent photocurrent (i-t) curves at various quercetin concentrations are represented in Figure 9A. An increase in photocurrent was observed as the quercetin concentration increases. The resulting calibration graph is shown in Figure 9B. Quercetin is oxidized at the applied potential of −0.85 V to form oxidized quercetin (quercetin quinone). The electrons generated are transferred to the conduction band of BiVO4. Electrochemical signal is then generated by flowing electrons from the conduction band of BiVO4 through the conducting PC and MWCNT, respectively. The conduction mechanism of the fabricated sensor is given in Figure 5 (vide supra). As can be seen from the calibration curve, the fabricated sensor operates linearly in the concentration range of 5–200 µM. In addition, the LOD (evaluated based on a signal-to-noise ratio of 3), limit of quantification (LOQ) (based on a signal-to-noise ratio of 10), and sensitivity values were determined as 0.133 μM, 0.443 μM, and 442 µA mM−1 cm−2, respectively. These calculated values and their comparisons with some quercetin sensors in the literature are presented in Table 2. As can be seen from the 200 µM and 100 µM on-off switching curves (Figure 9C), it is observed that the peak intensity increases under light due to the light-sensitive structure of the fabricated sensor and decreases with the light off. In addition, it is seen that the synthesized composite structure also has instant sensitivity to light. Interference studies were carried out using various compounds such as ascorbic acid (AA), citric acid (CA), glucose (G), tartaric acid (TA), dopamine (DA), cysteine (CSY), histamine (HA), phenethylamine (PEA) and tyramine, containing –OH and –NH2 groups. They can coexist with quercetin in natural products and may interfere with it during quercetin detection. The selectivity of the fabricated sensor was investigated in solutions containing 100 µM quercetin in the existence of selected interference compounds and the results are shown in Figure 9D. The developed sensor operates at a high voltage value of −0.85 V, which was determined as the operating voltage in the previous section (Figure 8A). It has been observed that the composite electrode prepared has specific properties for quercetin, since compounds containing –OH and –NH2 groups, which will create an interference effect, do not generally work at this voltage value. It was determined that the fabricated ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 photosensitive sensor showed good selectivity in quercetin analysis.
The reproducibility results of the prepared ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 composite electrode are shown in Figure 10A. It was calculated that seven different composite photosensitive sensors with the same properties and independently prepared under the same conditions had acceptable repeatability values and the RSD value was found to be 4.1%. Long-time stability measurement results are displayed in Figure 10B. It was seen that the photocurrent response of the ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 composite photosensitive sensor, which was stored and prepared at room conditions for seven weeks, preserved 92.4%. It is observed that the ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 photosensitive sensor prepared in this way has good selectivity, minimum interference effect and reproducibility in quercetin analysis. Some inorganic ions can coexist with quercetin in natural products, biological fluids and environmental samples and they may interfere with it during quercetin detection. The results of the study performed to investigate the interference influence of some inorganic ions (Cl, NO3, SO42−, Pb2+, Zn2+, Cu2+, Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+) on the quercetin analysis of the fabricated photosensitive sensor are shown in Figure 10C. In the interference study performed in the presence of the above-mentioned ions, it appears that transition metal ions such as Pb2+, Zn2+ and Cu2+ show almost no interference effect. On the other hand, it is observed that cations such as Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+ and anions such as SO42−, Cl, NO3, which are frequently found in food samples, have a very low level (0.1–0.8%) of interference effect. It was observed that the electrochemical response of the constructed ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 photosensitive sensor to quercetin was significantly preserved in the presence of these interference ions.
For quercetin analysis in a real-life sample, a sample of Turkish traditional black tea (ÇAY) was obtained from a local market. In our work, 1 g of black tea sample was treated with 50 mL of absolute ethanol and filtered through Whatman Grade 1 qualitative filter paper. Then, 1 mL of the obtained extract solution was taken and diluted with 25 mL of PBS and quercetin was analyzed by the developed photosensitive ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 sensor. In addition, the prepared ÇAY was analyzed by adding quercetin at various concentrations (0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 5 µM) and RSD and recovery values were measured. The acquired quercetin analysis results in the black tea extracts via the developed photosensitive ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 sensor are given in Table 3. Additionally, prepared tea extracts were analyzed by U-HPLC (Agilent 1260 Infinity II). The equipment was included Phenomenex Kinetex 2.6 µm C18 100 Å HPLC columns, an automated gradient controller, a column oven and a diode array detector (DAD). The column oven temperature, injected sample volume and the flow rate was settled 30 °C, 20 µL and 1.5 mL/min. For HPLC measurements, the mobile phase was settled by isocratic elution; A (ultrapure water) 20% and acetonitrile (ACN) 80%. The mobile phase and samples were filtered by 0.45 mm pore size (Millipore) membrane filter. The standard quercetin at different concentrations was used to draw a calibration curve. Despite the added quercetin values as spikes, low RSD values and a good recovery were observed in the values taken. As seen in Table 3, the HPLC analysis results of the prepared black tea samples are quite close to the quercetin amounts estimated by the photosensitive sensors. This shows that the fabricated photosensitive ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 sensor works with good sensitivity for quercetin analysis in a real-life sample.

4. Conclusions

It is important to acquire quercetin, one of the antioxidants required for scavenging free radicals from the body, from natural sources. In the current study, a new photosensitive sensor was developed for the electrochemical analysis of quercetin from natural samples using ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 ternary composite electrode materials. Owing to the photosensitivity and stable structure of BiVO4 in the formed heterojunction electrode, the facilitation of electron conduction by PC, and the high electron permeability of MWCNT, electron transfer was successfully carried out in the developed photosensitive quercetin sensor. The photosensitive ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 quercetin sensor gave a linear response in the 10-200 µM quercetin concentration range at −0.8 V, and the LOD, LOQ and sensitivity values were correspondingly determined as 0.133 µM, 0.443 µM, 442 µA mM−1 cm−2. The developed photosensitive ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 sensor was found to have good selectivity, low interference effect, reproducible and high long-time stability values. In addition, this sensor in the real-life sample also has good recovery values. In summary, the developed photosensitive ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 sensor promises to perform a sensitive and stable quercetin analysis.

Author Contributions

Discussion, S.Ç., C.S. and M.Ö.; experiments, analysis and investigation, İ.S., E.K., S.Ç. and C.S.; methodology and funding acquisition, S.Ç., C.S. and M.Ö. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially funded by the Turkish Academy of Sciences (TUBA), TURKİYE.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

M.Ö. thanks Turkish Academy of Sciences (TUBA) for partial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Feng, Y.; Li, P.; Wei, J. Engineering Functional Mesoporous Materials from Plant Polyphenol Based Coordination Polymers. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022, 468, 214649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rahim, M.A.; Kristufek, S.L.; Pan, S.; Richardson, J.J.; Caruso, F. Phenolic Building Blocks for the Assembly of Functional Materials. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 1904–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ay, M.; Charli, A.; Jin, H.; Anantharam, V.; Kanthasamy, A.; Kanthasamy, A.G. Chapter 32—Quercetin. In Nutraceuticals Efficacy, Safety and Toxicity; Gupta, R.C.B.T.-N., Ed.; Academic Press: Boston, UK, 2016; pp. 447–452. ISBN 978-0-12-802147-7. [Google Scholar]
  4. Thangasamy, T.; Sittadjody, S.; Burd, R. Chapter 27—Quercetin: A Potential Complementary and Alternative Cancer Therapy. In Complementary and Alternative Therapies and the Aging Population; Watson, R., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2009; pp. 563–584. ISBN 978-0-12-374228-5. [Google Scholar]
  5. Phattanaphakdee, W.; Ditipaeng, C.; Uttayarat, P.; Thongnopkoon, T.; Athikomkulchai, S.; Chittasupho, C. Development and Validation of HPLC Method for Determination of Quercetin in Hydrogel Transdermal Patches Loaded with Red Onion Peel Extract. Trop. J. Nat. Prod. Res. 2022, 6, 1210–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Khursheed, R.; Wadhwa, S.; Kumar, B.; Gulati, M.; Gupta, S.; Chaitanya, M.V.N.L.; Kumar, D.; Jha, N.K.; Gupta, G.; Prasher, P.; et al. Development and Validation of RP-HPLC Based Bioanalytical Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Curcumin and Quercetin in Rat’s Plasma. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 149, 870–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mustafa, A.M.; Abouelenein, D.; Angeloni, S.; Maggi, F.; Navarini, L.; Sagratini, G.; Santanatoglia, A.; Torregiani, E.; Vittori, S.; Caprioli, G. A New HPLC-MS/MS Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Quercetin and Its Derivatives in Green Coffee Beans. Foods 2022, 11, 3033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lin, S.; Zhang, H.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Cheng, K.-W.; Wang, M.; Cao, H.; Xiao, J. Investigation of New Products of Quercetin Formed in Boiling Water via UPLC-Q-TOF-MS-MS Analysis. Food Chem. 2022, 386, 132747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mantashloo, R.; Bahar, S. Synthesis of Magnetic Graphene Quantum Dots Based Molecularly Imprinted Polymers for Fluorescent Determination of Quercetin. Microchem. J. 2023, 185, 108233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jeevika, A.; Alagarsamy, G.; Celestina, J.J. Biogenic Synthesis of Carbon Quantum Dots from Garlic Peel Bio-Waste for Use as a Fluorescent Probe for Sensing of Quercetin. Luminescence 2022, 37, 1991–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ma, Y.; Yang, X.; Leng, X.; Liu, X.; Schipper, D. A High-Nuclearity Cd(Ii)-Nd(Iii) Nanocage for the Rapid Ratiometric Fluorescent Detection of Quercetin. CrystEngComm 2022, 24, 4534–4539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Katori, M.; Watanabe, M.; Tanaka, H.; Yakushiji, S.; Ueda, T.; Kamada, K.; Soh, N. Development of Enzyme/Titanate Nanosheet Complex Coated with Molecularly Imprinted Polydopamine for Colorimetric Quercetin Assay. Anal. Sci. 2022, 38, 777–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fan, Y.; Yao, J.; Huang, M.; Linghu, C.; Guo, J.; Li, Y. Non-Conjugated Polymer Dots for Fluorometric and Colorimetric Dual-Mode Detection of Quercetin. Food Chem. 2021, 359, 129962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, J.; Wang, H.; Han, S. Ultrasensitive Determination of Epicatechin, Rutin, and Quercetin by Capillary Electrophoresis Chemiluminescence. Acta Chromatogr. 2012, 24, 679–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Qiu, H.; Luo, C.; Sun, M.; Lu, F.; Fan, L.; Li, X. A Novel Chemiluminescence Sensor for Determination of Quercetin Based on Molecularly Imprinted Polymeric Microspheres. Food Chem. 2012, 134, 469–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gomes, A.; Mattos, G.J.; Coldibeli, B.; Dekker, R.F.H.; Barbosa, A.M.; Dekker, S.E.R. Covalent attachment of laccase to carboxymethyl-botryosphaeran in aqueous solution for the construction of a voltammetric biosensor to quantify quercetin. Bioelectrochemistry 2020, 135, 107543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Li, J.; Chang, H.; Zhang, N.; He, Y.; Zhang, D.; Liu, B.; Fang, Y. Recent advances in enzyme inhibition based-electrochemical biosensors for pharmaceutical and environmental analysis. Talanta 2023, 253, 124092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zheng, S.; Liu, T.; Zhang, N.; Li, L.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, E.; Tang, J.; Guo, J. A 3D Flower-like Co/Ni Bimetallic Organic Framework as an Excellent Material for Electrochemical Determination of Quercetin. New J. Chem. 2023, 47, 7566–7574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gao, F.; Hong, W.; Xu, B.; Wang, Y.; Lu, L.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, C.; Deng, X.; Tang, J. MXene Nanosheets Decorated with Pt Nanostructures for the Selective Electrochemical Detection of Quercetin. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2023, 6, 6869–6878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vinothkumar, V.; Sakthivel, R.; Chen, S.-M.; Kim, T.H. Facile Design of Wolframite Type CoWO4 Nanoparticles: A Selective and Simultaneous Electrochemical Detection of Quercetin and Rutin. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2022, 922, 116774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tian, L.; Wang, B.; Chen, R.; Gao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, T. Determination of Quercetin Using a Photo-Electrochemical Sensor Modified with Titanium Dioxide and a Platinum(II)-Porphyrin Complex. Microchim. Acta 2015, 182, 687–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mahdiye Khatami, S.; Arvand, M.; Farahmand Habibi, M. Efficient “on–off” Photo-Electrochemical Sensing Platform Based on Titanium Dioxide Nanotube Arrays Decorated with Silver Doped Tin Oxide for Ultra-Sensitive Quercetin Detection. Microchem. J. 2022, 183, 108141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yue, H.Y.; Zhang, H.J.; Huang, S.; Gao, X.; Song, S.S.; Wang, Z.; Wang, W.Q.; Guan, E.H. A Novel Non-Enzymatic Dopamine Sensors Based on NiO-Reduced Graphene Oxide Hybrid Nanosheets. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 5000–5007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, Y.; He, S.; Guo, W.; Hu, Y.; Huang, J.; Mulcahy, J.R.; Wei, W.D. Surface-Plasmon-Driven Hot Electron Photochemistry. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 2927–2954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Usuki, A.; Kojima, Y.; Kawasumi, M.; Okada, A.; Fukushima, Y.; Kurauchi, T.; Kamigaito, O. Synthesis of nylon 6-clay hybrid. J. Mater. Res. 1993, 8, 1179–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kojima, Y.; Usuki, A.; Kawasumi, M.; Okada, A.; Fukushima, Y.; Kurauchi, T.; Kamigaito, O. Mechanical properties of nylon 6-clay hybrid. J. Mater. Res. 1993, 8, 1185–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vaia, R.A.; Ishii, H.; Giannelis, E.P. Synthesis and properties of two-dimensional nanostructures by direct intercalation of polymer melts in layered silicates. Chem. Mater. 1993, 5, 1694–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lan, T.P.; Pinnavaia, T.J. Clay-Reinforced Epoxy Nanocomposites. Chem. Mater. 1994, 6, 2216–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Karen, I.W.; Richard, A.V. Polymer Nanocomposites. MRS Bull. 2007, 32, 314–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Baibarac, M.; Lira-Cantứ, M.; Orό Sol, J.; Baltog, I.; Casan-Pastor, N.; Gomez-Romero, P. Poly(N-Vinyl Carbazole) and Carbon Nanotubes Based Composites and Their Application to Rechargeable Lithium Batteries. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2007, 67, 2556–2563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Gueye, M.N.; Carella, A.; Vincent, J.F.; Demadrille, R.; Simonato, J.P. Progress in Understanding Structure and Transport Properties of PEDOT-Based Materials: A Critical Review. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2020, 108, 100616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Umoren, S.A.; Solomon, M.M. Protective Polymeric Films for Industrial Substrates: A Critical Review on Past and Recent Applications with Conducting Polymers and Polymer Composites/Nanocomposites. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2019, 104, 380–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ehrenstein, G. Polymeric Materials: Structure, Properties, Applications; Hanser Publications: Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2001; ISBN 978-1569903100. [Google Scholar]
  34. Tsarevsky, N.; Sarbu, T.; Gobelt, B.; Matyjaszewski, K. Synthesis of Styrene-Acrylonitrile Copolymers and Related Block Copolymers by Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 6142–6148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Çoğal, S.; Kiristi, M.; Ocakoğlu, K.; Öksüz, L.; Öksüz, A.U. Electrochromic Properties of Electrochemically Synthesized Porphyrin/3-Substituted Polythiophene Copolymers. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2015, 31, 551–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Billaud, D.; Maarouf, E.B.; Hannecart, E. Chemical Oxidation and Polymerization of İndole. Synth. Met. 1995, 69, 571–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tran, T.Q.N.; Das, G.; Yoon, H.H. Nickel-metal organic framework/MWCNT composite electrode for non-enzymatic urea detection, Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 243, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Baghayeri, M.; Sedrpoushan, A.; Mohammadi, A.; Heidari, M. A non-enzymatic glucose sensor based on NiO nanoparticles/functionalized SBA 15/MWCNT-modified carbon paste electrode. Ionics 2017, 23, 1553–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Karimi-Maleh, H.; Cellat, K.; Arıkan, K.; Savk, A.; Karimi, F.; Şen, F. Palladium–Nickel nanoparticles decorated on Functionalized-MWCNT for high precision non-enzymatic glucose sensing, Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 250, 123042. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wu, W.; Tan, Z.; Chen, X.; Chen, X.; Cheng, L.; Wu, H.; Li, P.; Zhang, Z. Carnation-like Morphology of BiVO4-7 Enables Sensitive Photoelectrochemical Determination of Cr(VI) in the Food and Environment. Biosensors 2022, 12, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Qi, X.; Tao, S. MWCNT modified Ni–Fe LDH/BiVO4 heterojunction: Boosted visible-light-driven photoelectrochemical aptasensor for ofloxacin detection. RSC Adv. 2022, 37, 24269–24277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kamble, G.; Natarajan, T.S.; Patil, S.S.; Thomas, M.; Chougale, R.K.; Sanadi, P.D.; Siddharth, U.S.; Ling, Y.C. BiVO4 As a Sustainable and Emerging Photocatalyst: Synthesis Methodologies, Engineering Properties, and Its Volatile Organic Compounds Degradation Efficiency. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Blanco, I.; Abate, L.; Bottino, F.A.; Bottino, P. Thermal Degradation of Hepta Cyclopentyl, Mono Phenyl-Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane (hcp-POSS)/Polystyrene (PS) Nanocomposites. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2012, 97, 849–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Janarthanan, P.; Yunus, W.; Ahmad, B. Thermal behavior and surface morphology studies on polystyrene grafted sago starch. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 90, 2053–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sahiner, N.; Pekel, N.; Guven, O. Radiation synthesis, characterization and amidoximation of N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone/acrylonitrile interpenetrating polymer networks. React. Funct. Polym. 1999, 39, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Çakar, S.; Özacar, M. Fe-Tannic Acid Complex Dye as Photo Sensitizer for Different Morphological ZnO Based DSSCs. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2016, 163, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, L.; Dai, Z.; Zheng, G.; Yao, Z.; Mu, J. Superior Visible Light Photocatalytic Performance of Reticular BiVO4 Synthesized: Via a Modified Sol-Gel Method. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 10654–10664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Balogun, A.O.; Lasode, O.A.; Li, H.; McDonald, A.G. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Study and Thermal Decomposition Kinetics of Sorghum Bicolour Glume and Albizia Pedicellaris Residues. Waste Biomass Valorization 2015, 6, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, S.N.; Zhang, F.D.; Huang, A.M.; Zhou, Q. Distinction of Four Dalbergia Species by FTIR, 2nd Derivative IR, and 2D-IR Spectroscopy of Their Ethanol-Benzene Extractives. Holzforschung 2016, 70, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhao, X.; Liu, R.; Chi, Z.; Teng, Y.; Qin, P. New Insights into the Behavior of Bovine Serum Albumin Adsorbed onto Carbon Nanotubes: Comprehensive Spectroscopic Studies. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 5625–5631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xu, H.; Fan, P.; Xu, L. CuO/ZnO/CQDs@PAN Nanocomposites with Ternary Heterostructures for Enhancing Photocatalytic Performance. Catalysts 2023, 13, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Akir, S.; Barras, A.; Coffinier, Y.; Bououdina, M.; Boukherroub, R.; Omrani, A.D. Eco-Friendly Synthesis of ZnO Nanoparticles with Different Morphologies and Their Visible Light Photocatalytic Performance for the Degradation of Rhodamine B. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 10259–10265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Das, T.K.; Ilaiyaraja, P.; Mocherla, P.S.V.; Bhalerao, G.M.; Sudakar, C. Influence of Surface Disorder, Oxygen Defects and Bandgap in TiO2 Nanostructures on the Photovoltaic Properties of Dye Sensitized Solar Cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2016, 144, 194–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pingmuang, K.; Chen, J.; Kangwansupamonkon, W.; Wallace, G.G.; Phanichphant, S.; Nattestad, A. Composite Photocatalysts Containing BiVO4 for Degradation of Cationic Dyes. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Chae, S.H.; Lee, Y.H. Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene towards Soft Electronics. Nano Converg. 2014, 1, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Ibrahim, I.; Lim, H.N.; Mohd Zawawi, R.; Ahmad Tajudin, A.; Ng, Y.H.; Guo, H.; Huang, N.M. A Review on Visible-Light Induced Photoelectrochemical Sensors Based on CdS Nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. B 2018, 6, 4551–4568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Çakar, S.; Çakiroğlu, B.; Şen, Ş.; Özacar, M. A Photo-Sensitive BiVO4@Bi2O3@g-C3N4 Sensor for the Detection of Dopamine. Microchem. J. 2022, 178, 107360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sengupta, P.; Shinde, S.; Majumdar, P.; Löffler, M.; Datta, P.; Patra, S. Direct Growth of Bismuth Vanadate Thin Film Arrays on FTO via Galvanic Deposition Mediated by BiOI Nanosheets for Fabrication of Photoelectrochemical Non-Enzymatic Dopamine Sensing Platform. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 047513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhu, Q.G.; Sujari, A.N.A.; Ab Ghani, S. Nafion-MWCNT Composite Modified Graphite Paste for the Analysis of Quercetin in Fruits of Acanthopanax Sessiliflorus. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 177, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rui, Z.; Huang, W.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, K.; Cao, Y.; Tu, J. Facile Synthesis of Graphene / Polypyrrole 3D Composite for a High-Sensitivity Non-Enzymatic Dopamine Detection. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 44840, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Karakaya, S.; Kaya, İ. An Electrochemical Detection Platform for Selective and Sensitive Voltammetric Determination of Quercetin Dosage in a Food Supplement by Poly(9-(2-(Pyren-1-Yl)Ethyl)-9h-Carbazole) Coated Indium Tin Oxide Electrode. Polymer 2021, 212, 123300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chen, X.; Li, Q.; Yu, S.; Lin, B.; Wu, K. Activated Silica Gel Based Carbon Paste Electrodes Exhibit Signal Enhancement for Quercetin. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 81, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yao, Y.Y.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Z.F.; Xu, J.K.; Wen, Y.P. Electrochemical Determination of Quercetin by Self-Assembled Platinum Nanoparticles/Poly(Hydroxymethylated-3,4-Ethylenedioxylthiophene) Nanocomposite Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2014, 25, 505–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Feng, S.; Guo, J.; Chen, X.; Meng, J.; Zhang, G.; Liu, G.; Sun, H.; Wang, B.; Liu, W. N, S Co-Doped Graphene/Ag@Au Triangular Core-Shell Nanomaterials for Determination of Quercetin. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2020, 15, 8041–8054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kan, X.; Zhang, T.; Zhong, M.; Lu, X. CD/AuNPs/MWCNTs Based Electrochemical Sensor for Quercetin Dual-Signal Detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 77, 638–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of preparation of PST/PAN/PIN ternary conductive composite.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of preparation of PST/PAN/PIN ternary conductive composite.
Biosensors 13 00729 g001
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of PST, PAN and PST/PAN/PIN.
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of PST, PAN and PST/PAN/PIN.
Biosensors 13 00729 g002
Figure 3. TGA thermograms for PST, PAN, PIN and PST/PAN/PIN.
Figure 3. TGA thermograms for PST, PAN, PIN and PST/PAN/PIN.
Biosensors 13 00729 g003
Figure 4. (A) XRD spectrum of BiVO4, (B) FTIR spectra of BiVO4, PC, MWCNT and MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 electrodes, (C) Mott-Schottky, (D) UV-Vis absorption spectra, (E) DRS spectra and (F) Kubelka–Munk graphs of prepared ITO/BiVO4, ITO/PC, ITO/MWCNT and ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 electrodes.
Figure 4. (A) XRD spectrum of BiVO4, (B) FTIR spectra of BiVO4, PC, MWCNT and MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 electrodes, (C) Mott-Schottky, (D) UV-Vis absorption spectra, (E) DRS spectra and (F) Kubelka–Munk graphs of prepared ITO/BiVO4, ITO/PC, ITO/MWCNT and ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 electrodes.
Biosensors 13 00729 g004
Figure 5. The energy band diagram of prepared non-enzymatic quercetin sensor based ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4.
Figure 5. The energy band diagram of prepared non-enzymatic quercetin sensor based ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4.
Biosensors 13 00729 g005
Figure 6. FE-SEM images of (A) BiVO4 and (B) MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 composites and (C) EDX spectrum of MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 composites.
Figure 6. FE-SEM images of (A) BiVO4 and (B) MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 composites and (C) EDX spectrum of MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 composites.
Biosensors 13 00729 g006
Figure 7. Elemental mapping images of prepared MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 composites.
Figure 7. Elemental mapping images of prepared MWCNT@PC@BiVO4 composites.
Biosensors 13 00729 g007aBiosensors 13 00729 g007b
Figure 8. (A) Photocurrent vs. potential (LSV) curves, (B) time dependent photocurrent (i-t), (C) Nyquist plot, (D) Bode plot, (E) equivalent circuit model and (F) dark mode Nyquist plot in 100 µM quercetin solution on light of fabricated sensors.
Figure 8. (A) Photocurrent vs. potential (LSV) curves, (B) time dependent photocurrent (i-t), (C) Nyquist plot, (D) Bode plot, (E) equivalent circuit model and (F) dark mode Nyquist plot in 100 µM quercetin solution on light of fabricated sensors.
Biosensors 13 00729 g008
Figure 9. (A) Amperometric I-t curves, (B) calibration curves of different concentrations of quercetin, (C) on-off switching curves and (D) interference study.
Figure 9. (A) Amperometric I-t curves, (B) calibration curves of different concentrations of quercetin, (C) on-off switching curves and (D) interference study.
Biosensors 13 00729 g009
Figure 10. (A) Reproducibility, (B) long-term stability and (C) interference studies with different ions of the fabricated photosensitive quercetin sensors.
Figure 10. (A) Reproducibility, (B) long-term stability and (C) interference studies with different ions of the fabricated photosensitive quercetin sensors.
Biosensors 13 00729 g010
Table 1. Electrochemical impedance characteristics of fabricated sensors.
Table 1. Electrochemical impedance characteristics of fabricated sensors.
SensorsRs
(Ω)
RCT
(Ω)
Cμ
(10−7 F cm−2)
fmax
(Hz)
τe
(ms)
τd
(ms)
ITO23.0617.444.36935.120.1030.0760
ITO/MWCNT18.02104.841.05268.020.5940.1101
ITO/MWCNT@PC22.0566.131.69223.030.7130.1117
ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO416.0160.752.0279.122.0120.1227
Table 2. Comparison of photosensitive sensors utilized in quercetin detection.
Table 2. Comparison of photosensitive sensors utilized in quercetin detection.
SensorsMethodLOD
(µM)
Linear Range
(µM)
Ref.
ITO/MWCNT@PC@BiVO4PEC0.13310-200This study
BiVO4/FTOPEC0.154100–106[58]
Nafion/MWCNT-GPEPEC6.010–910[59]
TiO2/PtP/GCEPEC0.82–500[21]
PPy/graphenePEC0.05100–1000[60]
poly(Pyr-Carb)/ITOEC0.592–500[61]
Ac–Si/CPEEC0.01165–100[62]
PtNPs/PEDOT-MeOH/GCEEC0.00520.04–99.09[63]
NS-G/T-Ag@Au NPs/GCEEC0.050.5–15[64]
CD/AuNPs/MWCNTsEC0.0640.005–7[65]
FTO: Fluorine doped tin oxide, GPE: Graphite pencil electrode, PtP: Platinum(II)-porphyrin complex, GCE: Glassy carbon electrode, PPy: Polypyrrole, Pyr-Carb: Poly(9-(2-(Pyren-1-Yl)Ethyl)-9H-Carbazole), CPE: Carbon paste electrode, PEDOT: Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene), NS-G/TAg: N, S Co-Doped Graphene/Ag@Au, CD: Cyclodextrin, PEC: photoelectrochemical, EC: electrochemical.
Table 3. Detection of quercetin in black tea extracts.
Table 3. Detection of quercetin in black tea extracts.
ExtractAdded
µM
Found
µM
RSD
%
Recovery
%
Black Tea 100.613.6-
0.10.712.399.7
0.51.112.699.8
11.602.998.9
22.563.697.8
55.524.298.4
Black Tea 200.593.4-
0.10.682.699.6
0.51.082.499.8
11.582.298.8
22.563.497.6
55.555.296.5
Black Tea 1 HPLC-0.562.1-
Black Tea 2 HPLC-0.531.8-
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sarikaya, İ.; Kaleoğlu, E.; Çakar, S.; Soykan, C.; Özacar, M. An Enhanced Photosensitive Sensor Based on ITO/MWCNTs@Polymer Composite@BiVO4 for Quercetin Detection. Biosensors 2023, 13, 729. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13070729

AMA Style

Sarikaya İ, Kaleoğlu E, Çakar S, Soykan C, Özacar M. An Enhanced Photosensitive Sensor Based on ITO/MWCNTs@Polymer Composite@BiVO4 for Quercetin Detection. Biosensors. 2023; 13(7):729. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13070729

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sarikaya, İrem, Esra Kaleoğlu, Soner Çakar, Cengiz Soykan, and Mahmut Özacar. 2023. "An Enhanced Photosensitive Sensor Based on ITO/MWCNTs@Polymer Composite@BiVO4 for Quercetin Detection" Biosensors 13, no. 7: 729. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13070729

APA Style

Sarikaya, İ., Kaleoğlu, E., Çakar, S., Soykan, C., & Özacar, M. (2023). An Enhanced Photosensitive Sensor Based on ITO/MWCNTs@Polymer Composite@BiVO4 for Quercetin Detection. Biosensors, 13(7), 729. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13070729

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop