Next Article in Journal
Paper-Based Aptasensor Assay for Detection of Food Adulterant Sildenafil
Previous Article in Journal
Entropy-Driven Molecular Beacon Assisted Special RCA Assay with Enhanced Sensitivity for Room Temperature DNA Biosensing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Towards Point-of-Care Single Biomolecule Detection Using Next Generation Portable Nanoplasmonic Biosensors: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Active Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Platform Based on a 2D Material–Flexible Nanotip Array

by
Yong Bin Kim
1,†,
Satyabrat Behera
2,†,
Dukhyung Lee
2,
Seon Namgung
2,
Kyoung-Duck Park
1,
Dai-Sik Kim
2,* and
Bamadev Das
2,*
1
Department of Physics, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang 37673, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Physics and Quantum Photonics Institute, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biosensors 2024, 14(12), 619; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14120619
Submission received: 10 November 2024 / Revised: 5 December 2024 / Accepted: 13 December 2024 / Published: 15 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Micro-nano Optic-Based Biosensing Technology and Strategy)

Abstract

:
Two-dimensional materials with a nanostructure have been introduced as promising candidates for SERS platforms for sensing application. However, the dynamic control and tuning of SERS remains a long-standing problem. Here, we demonstrated active tuning of the enhancement factor of the first- and second-order Raman mode of monolayer (1L) MoS2 transferred onto a flexible metallic nanotip array. Using mechanical strain, the enhancement factor of 1L MoS2/nanotip is modulated from 1.23 to 8.72 for 2LA mode. For the same mode, the SERS intensity is enhanced by ~31 times when silver nanoparticles of ~13 nm diameter are deposited on 1L MoS2/nanotip, which is tuned up to ~34 times by compressive strain. The change in SERS enhancement factor is due to the decrease (increase) in gap width as the sample is bent inwardly (outwardly). This is corroborated by FEM structural and electromagnetic simulation. We also observed significant control over mode peak and linewidth, which may have applications in biosensing, chemical detection, and optoelectronics.

1. Introduction

Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) is an enhanced version of Raman scattering enabled by metallic nanostructure. It is now well documented that an enhanced Raman signal, i.e., SERS can be attributed to electromagnetic and chemical enhancement. While the chemical enhancement mainly comes from the interaction between the molecule and the metallic substrate, the architecture of the substrates plays an important role towards electromagnetic enhancement [1,2]. Metallic nanostructure-decorated substrates [3] such as nanospheres or nanoparticles [4,5], nanorods [5,6], nanowires [6], nano-stars [7,8], and nanoscale-roughened films [9,10] have enabled application in biosensing [11,12], pesticide detection [13], and chemical analysis [14]. Apart from the metallic nanostructure, plasmonic structures such as nanogap have also shown great SERS enhancement [15,16,17]. However, research into a dynamic SERS platform pivoted by tunable electromagnetic field localization is still lagging. Recently, enormous amounts of research have been focused to develop a highly sensitive SERS platform based on two-dimensional (2D) materials [15,18,19]. Among 2D materials, transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) are an emerging class of materials with superior applications in opto- electronics. In particular, their dynamic response to external perturbations such as mechanical strain [20], electrostatic gating [21], and pressure [22] makes them a great candidate for a flexible SERS platform [8,9]. Amongst various external perturbation methods, mechanical strain is an easy and exciting way to control the electronics properties, band gap, and phonon dispersion of TMDs, facilitating applications in tunable photonics devices [23], flexible electronics [21], thermoelectric energy conversion [24], field effect transistor [25], and catalysis [26]. MoS2–metal hybrid structures have been reported to show improved optical properties [27]. When 1L MoS2 is decorated on the nanostructure by means of mechanical exfoliation or chemical vapor deposition (CVD), intrinsic strain is generated on the monolayer, which dynamically changes the band-gap and its phonon properties.
This kind of system can have a dynamic response due to laser pressure [25], which lacks reconfigurable functionality and controllability. Moreover, most of these studies have particularly focused on opto-electronics device application. Hence, an active system that can dynamically control the SERS intensity of 2D materials needs to be designed. Here, we report a system consisting of mechanically exfoliated 1L MoS2 on a flexible nanotip array. We could dynamically control the electromagnetic field that is confined in between the two neighboring nanotips by applying external mechanical strain, which would then tune the SERS intensity of 1L MoS2, paving the way for a tunable 2D material-based SERS platform. In this paper, we mostly focused on tuning the Raman intensity of 1L MoS2 using the proposed flexible nanotip array sample. However, the hybrid platform of the 1L MoS2/nanotip sample could also be extended to sense other molecules.

2. Materials and Methods

To realize the dynamic SERS platform, we fabricated a metallic nanotip array on polyethylene terephthalate (PET) substrate. The detailed fabrication is schematically described in Figure 1a. Briefly, at first, a large area (5 mm × 5 mm) of anodized aluminum oxide (AAO) template containing hole arrays of ~70 nm diameter with an interpole distance about ~100 nm is transferred to PET [28] (see Supplementary Information S1). Using the same AAO template, we fabricated two different types of samples: (1) low-aspect ratio nanotip and (2) high-aspect ratio nanotip. A direct deposition (normal to substrate) of Ag metal (~100 nm) leads to the low-aspect ratio nanotip array [29], whereas the low angle deposition (2 degree) of metal onto the AAO template leads to a high-aspect ratio nanotip array (Figure 1a and Supplementary Information S1). After metal deposition, we stripped the AAO template from the substrates using a Kapton tape to obtain the final sample containing the nanotip array. Figure 1b,c shows scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of direct and angle-deposited Ag nanotips, respectively, which confirms the good coverage of the nanotip (see Supplementary Information S3 for cross-sectional images). Angle-deposited nanotips have higher coverage with ~70 nm diameter and shorter inter-tip distance of ~20 nm, as shown in Figure 1d. In the case of direct deposition, Ag nanoparticles cannot be deposited at the corner of the AAO template due to the shadow effect of nanoholes [30] (see Supplementary Information S2). However, in the angle deposition process, Ag nanoparticles are well deposited on the corner of the AAO template, resulting in Ag nanotips with high coverage. Finally, 1L MoS2 is transferred to the Ag nanotip/PET and to the bare PET substrate (Supplementary Information S4).

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2a shows the optical microscope (OM) image of monolayer (1L), bilayer, and few-layer molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) flakes transferred onto the Ag nanotip with some parts overlapping the Ag metal film region. The FESEM image of the sample (area inside the yellow dashed line box) is shown in Figure 2b. The highly magnified FESEM image shown in Figure 2b confirms that 1L MoS2 is transferred well onto Ag nanotips. The height profile extracted from the atomic force microscope (AFM) image (Supplementary Information S5) further confirms the thickness of 1L MoS2 to be ~0.62 nm, which is in good agreement with the previously reported data [31,32,33]. At first, we conducted finite element method (FEM) electromagnetic simulation of low and high aspect ratio nanotip arrays, as shown in Figure 2c. For the low aspect ratio sample, the field is mostly confined to the tip region, which would affect the Raman intensity of 1L MoS2. For the high aspect ratio, since the tips are closer, the field around these tips interacts with each other. This eventually confines more light in between the tips, thereby enhancing the Raman signal even more as compared to the low aspect ratio nanotip sample. This enhancement is demonstrated experimentally as well. The Raman spectroscopy of the sample is measured using a commercial confocal Raman setup with a 532 nm excitation laser with 0.5 mW power to avoid any temperature-induced Raman peak shift [34] (see Supplementary Information S6). Figure 2d presents the Raman spectra of 1L MoS2 on the bare PET substrate, with the low and high aspect ratio Ag nanotip array samples. All the data were deconvoluted with three Lorentzian peaks to extract the peak position, full width at half maxima (FWHM), and intensity. The Raman spectra of 1L MoS2 on bare PET has two first-order vibrational peaks, i.e., the E12g peak at 384.27cm−1 due to the in-plane vibration of molybdenum (Mo) and sulfur (S) in the opposite direction, and the A1g peak at 405.82 cm−1 due to the out-of-plane vibration of S [35,36]. The difference between these two peaks is ~21.55 cm−1, which is in accordance with the previous data for 1L MoS2 [37]. A third peak at 451.76 cm−1 is 2LA (longitudinal acoustic phonon) mode and is observed due to double-resonance Raman (DRR) scattering [38].
For SERS intensity, we checked the intensity of the Raman signal of the E12g, A1g, and 2LA peak. The intensity for the 1L MoS2/high-aspect ratio nanotip is enhanced by a factor of ~2.7 times compared to bare 1L MoS2/PET (Supplementary Information S7). To further demonstrate our proposed tunable SERS platform, we used 1L MoS2 transferred on a high aspect ratio flexible nanotip array sample, since it offers enhanced intensity as compared to the low-aspect ratio nanotip array in its flat condition (Figure 2d).
The schematic diagram of the method to tune the SERS intensity of the sample is presented in Figure 3a. As the sample is on a flexible substrate, we can apply both compressive (inward bent) and tensile (outward bent) strain to change the overall gap width in between nanotips, which ultimately increases or decreases the localized field intensity (Figure 3a). The strain-controlled field confinement eventually manipulates the SERS intensity of 1L MoS2. To avoid any artifacts due to changes in experimental condition, we fabricated all the samples at the same time with similar dimensions and measured them under similar bending conditions. Furthermore, the laser was focused on the same spot on 1L MoS2 for all the measurements at different bending conditions (see Supplementary Information S6). The detailed calculation of bending strain is presented in Supplementary Information S9. The sample was bent systematically with strain magnitudes of 0.82%, 1.22%, and 1.57% in both inward (negative sign) and outward (positive sign) directions. Figure 3b and Supplementary Information S10 present the strain-dependent Raman spectra of 1L MoS2/PET and 1L MoS2/nanotip. The extracted peak positions (mode peak), FWHM, and intensities are summarized in Figure 3c.
In the flat condition, for 1L MoS2/PET, the peak positions of E12g, A1g, and 2LA were 384.27 cm−1, 405.82 cm−1, and 451.76 cm−1, respectively. For the 1L MoS2/nanotip, the respective peaks positions shifted to 384.04 cm−1, 403.44 cm−1, and 454.06 cm−1. While we observed a small shift (−0.06%) in the E12g peak position, the A1g peak shifted by −0.58%. Since the E12g peak was insensitive to the substrate features, the small peak shift is due to the additional strain induced by the nanotip. The huge change in the A1g peak is due to the charge doping from the nanotip to the 2D material [39,40]. The 2LA peak is red-shifted by 0.5%. At flat conditions, both FWHM and SERS intensity of the 1L MoS2/nanotip is increased because of the enhanced strain and field localization in between nanotips.
The mode peak E12g of 1L MoS2/PET is shifted by +0.3% and −0.4% when it is under compressive and tensile strain of 1.57%, respectively, as observed by other researchers [41,42]. When the 1L MoS2/nanotip is under compressive strain, E12g is red-shifted by 0.4%, which is the opposite of what we observed in 1L MoS2/PET. To explain this anomaly, we consider that under the flat condition, 1L MoS2 is fixed on top of the nanotip as a tent, without slippage. Under compression, the contact area between 1L MoS2 and the metal increases. As 1L MoS2 approaches the metal surface, it takes the shape of the nanotip, and tensile strain is only exerted on 1L MoS2 at the tip of the metal [25], which explains the anomalous redshift of the E12g peak under compressive strain. There is a very small change (−0.02%) in the E12g peak due to tensile strain on the 1L MoS2/nanotip. The out-of-plane vibration mode (A1g) is shifted by −0.18% and −0.42% for compressive and tensile strains of the same magnitude (1.57%) for 1L MoS2/PET, respectively. However, it is shifted by −0.31% (compressive strain) and 0.02% (tensile strain) for the 1L MoS2/nanotip. When the 1L MoS2/nanotip is bent inwardly, 1L MoS2 becomes much closer to the Ag nanotip, thereby causing n-type doping of 1L MoS2, as confirmed by the redshift of the A1g peak. For the 2LA peak, the shift is about ~−1.0% in both bending directions in the 1L MoS2/PET sample. The redshift is due to a change in the lattice constant, which affects the band structure of the material [43,44]. The charge doping and strain also affect the line width of the spectra. The FWHM values of these modes are inversely proportional to the phonon lifetime. We observe that on PET and nanotip, the FWHM of 2LA mode increases (decreases) with compressive (tensile) strain, which is in good agreement with previous results [45]. Under compressive strain, A1g and E12g peak broadening is observed due to electron–phonon scattering [46] and tensile strain [47], respectively, on the nanotip array. On the other hand, there is an increase in phonon lifetime in the 1L MoS2/PET substrate, which leads to a decrease in FWHM. However, for outward bending, the effect of uniaxial tensile strain is dominant rather than doping, leading to an increase in the FWHM of both the optical phonons in the 1L MoS2/nanotip [48,49].
In terms of SERS performance, the strain-controlled intensity change in Raman modes is also investigated. For 1L MoS2/PET, the intensities of all mode peaks decreased significantly by ~75% for both directions of bending. This decreasing tendency is not desirable for a highly sensitive tunable SERS platform. On the other hand, for 1L MoS2/nanotip, the intensities of the mode peaks E12g, A1g, and 2LA are tuned from −45.6%, −40%, and −33.3% to +186.7%, +216.6%, and +374.3% by simply applying strain from +1.57 % (tensile) to −1.57% (compressive). Please note that it was surprising to observe that the tuning range was in increasing order from E12g to 2LA, which needs further study. We performed a finite element method (FEM) simulation of the structural and electromagnetic field of the nanotip array, as shown in Figure 3d. From the structural simulation, it was found that there is enormous strain localization in between the tips when bending strain is applied, which might cause the inter-tip gap width to increase or decrease. The electromagnetic field simulation confirms the increase or decrease in field confinement when the nanotips are closer or far away (Figure 3d). In pursuit of enhancing the SERS intensity, we deposited Ag nanoparticles using the e-beam evaporation method on the 1L MoS2/nanotip array to fabricate nanoparticle/1L MoS2/nanotip geometry [50]. These nanoparticles decorated on the 1L MoS2/nanotip would not only exert additional strain but also enhance the field confinement in the gap created by it. The schematic diagram of the sample is presented in Figure 4a. Shown in Figure 4b is the SEM image of the Ag nanoparticle deposited on the bare nanotip array on PET. From the image, it can be observed that the nanoparticles are decorated homogeneously on the surface of the tip. We also performed image processing of the FESEM image to isolate the nanoparticles and statistically determine the Ag nanoparticle size as ~13 nm (see Supplementary Information S11). The strain-dependent Raman spectra for the nanoparticle/1L MoS2/nanotip sample are shown in Figure 4c, Supplementary Information S12. We applied compressive strain to the sample to enhance the Raman signal. We observed the E12g mode to be split into two peaks at 372.85 cm−1 and 381.66 cm−1, suggesting additional strain due to nanoparticles in flat condition [20]. The extracted parameter corresponding to E12g(M), E12g, A1g, and 2LA mode is summarized in Figure 4d. Similar to 1L MoS2/nanotip, there is minimal change in the peak positions of E12g and A1g. However, E12g(M) and 2LA peaks shifted by −0.73% and +0.6%, respectively. The FWHM of the E12g and 2LA peak increased, whereas it decreased for E12g(M) and A1g. It is interesting to point out that the intensity of the SERS signal was greatly enhanced as compared to the 1L MoS2/nanotip with the inclusion of nanoparticles. The significant enhancement in the intensity of the Raman peaks is due to stronger field localization between the nanoparticle and the nanotip separated by 1L MoS2. Beyond −1.57% of strain, the intensity, peak position, and FWHM of all the modes reverted to their initial values. This might be due to the damage or sliding of 1L MoS2 by excessive strain [25].
Enhancement factor is an important parameter for validating the SERS performance (Supplementary Information S13) [51]. The experimental enhancement factor (EFExp) is calculated by (Supplementary Information S11)
E F E x p = I S E R S I R e f e r e n c e
where I S E R S is the surface-enhanced Raman intensity (in our case, nanoparticles/1L MoS2/nanotip and 1L MoS2/nanotip) and I R e f e r e n c e is the Raman intensity of the bare 1L MoS2 on the PET substrate. The highest enhancement factors are calculated to be 12, 20, and 34.1 for E12g, A1g, and 2LA modes, respectively, at −1.57% (inward) strain for nanoparticles/1L MoS2/nanotip. We assume that the significant enhancement in 2LA Raman mode is due to exciton–plasmon coupling in 1L MoS2 [49]. To find out the strain-dependent inter-tip gap width change, the simulated enhancement factor for the different gap width is normalized and compared with normalized EFexp, as shown in Figure 5b (Supplementary Information S14 and S15). From the data, it can be concluded that there is an overall gap width increase (decrease) of 10 nm for inward (outward) bending. The modulation of depth of the enhancement factor is of the order 103 as compared to the lowest enhancement factor of 1L MoS2/nanotip at outward bending (Figure 5c). We could also achieve initial intensity at flat after the bending experiment (Supplementary Information S16), showing the reconfigurability of the platform. We checked the intensity at various spots in the nanoparticle/1L MoS2/nanotip sample (Supplementary Information S17). We observed similar SERS signals from five different spots, suggesting a large-area SERS platform. A comparative study between our work and the reported work is presented in Supplementary Information S18, and the respective graph is shown in Figure 5d. Although some of the work reported a good enhancement factor, our work shows the ability to control the enhancement factor from low to high for first- and second-order Raman signals.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we demonstrated a mechanically active SERS platform based on nanoparticles/1L MoS2/nanotip and 1L MoS2/nanotip fabricated on a PET substrate. We recognized three different modes, E12g, A1g, and 2LA, in the Raman spectra of 1L MoS2 on bare substrates and nanotip arrays. The peak position and FWHM were affected by the external strain induced. More importantly, the SERS intensity was enhanced (reduced) significantly with inward (outward) bending of the 1L MoS2/nanotip sample. To enhance the signal even more, silver nanoparticles were deposited on the 1L MoS2/nanotip sample, forming nanoparticles/1L MoS2/nanotip geometry. With the external inward bending, this sample offered an enhancement factor as high as 35. The overall enhancement factor was tuned from 1.23 to 35, showing an excellent tunability of the SERS platform. The change in intensity (or enhancement factor) is due to the change in gap width, which is confirmed by FEM structural and electromagnetic simulation. Our work may find applications in developing future tunable devices for energy, sensing, and opto-electronics.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/bios14120619/s1, Supplementary Information S1. Transfer of anodized aluminum oxide (AAO) template to PET substrate; Supplementary Information S2. Fabrication of low and high-aspect ratio Ag nanotip array; Supplementary Information S3. SEM images of flexible nano-tip array; Supplementary Information S4. Dry transfer of MoS2 to Ag nanotip array; Supplementary Information S5. Characterization of MoS2 after transfer on PET substrate; Supplementary Information S6. Confocal Raman setup and measurement details; Supplementary Information S7. Extracted parameters from Raman spectra of MoS2/PET and MoS2/nanotip array; Supplementary Information S8. Experimental enhancement factor of MoS2/PET and MoS2/nanotip array; Supplementary Information S9. Calculation of bending strain of nanotip array on PET substrate; Supplementary Information S10. Detail strain dependent Raman data for MoS2/PET and MoS2/nanotip; Supplementary Information S11. FESEM images of nanoparticle/MoS2/nanotip; Supplementary Information S12. Detail strain dependent Raman data of nanoparticle/1L MoS2/nanotip; Supplementary Information S13. Enhancement factor calculation from experiment and simulation; Supplementary Information S14. FEM simulation of electromagnetic wave of low-aspect ratio nanotip array; Supplementary Information S15. FEM simulation of electromagnetic wave of high-aspect ratio nanotip array; Supplementary Information S16. Reproducibility of Raman spectra of 1L MoS2/nanotip after bending experiment; Supplementary Information S17. Raman spectra of nanoparticle/1L MoS2/nanotip measured on various spots; Supplementary Information S18. Plasmon resonance for nanotip and nanoparticle/nanotip array; Supplementary Information S19. Comparison of reported enhancement factor of MoS2 with current work [52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60].

Author Contributions

B.D. and D.-S.K. conceptualized the experiment. Y.B.K., S.B. and B.D. conducted the experiment together. B.D. and D.L. worked on optical simulation. S.N. provided useful suggestions on MoS2 transfer and its characterization. S.N. and K.-D.P. helped in analyzing the Raman data and writing manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2015R1A3A2031768, NRF-2022M3H4A1A04096465, NRF-2021R1A6A1A10042944).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank UNIST Central Research Facilities (UCRF) at Ulsan National Institute of Science of Technology (UNIST) for providing a facility for Raman measurements.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Langer, J.; de Aberasturi, D.J.; Aizpurua, J.; Alvarez-Puebla, R.A.; Auguié, B.; Baumberg, J.J.; Bazan, G.C.; Bell, S.E.J.; Boisen, A.; Brolo, A.G.; et al. Present and Future of Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Guselnikova, O.; Lim, H.; Kim, H.-J.; Kim, S.H.; Gorbunova, A.; Eguchi, M.; Postnikov, P.; Nakanishi, T.; Asahi, T.; Na, J.; et al. New Trends in Nanoarchitectured SERS Substrates: Nanospaces, 2D Materials, and Organic Heterostructures. Small 2022, 18, 2107182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Solís, D.M.; Taboada, J.M.; Obelleiro, F.; Liz-Marzán, L.M.; de Abajo, F.J.G. Optimization of Nanoparticle-Based SERS Substrates through Large-Scale Realistic Simulations. ACS Photonics 2017, 4, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Stiles, P.L.; Dieringer, J.A.; Shah, N.C.; Van Duyne, R.P. Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2008, 1, 601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kim, D.; Ko, Y.; Kwon, G.; Kim, U.-J.; Lee, J.H.; You, J. 2,2,6,6-Tetramethylpiperidine-1-Oxy-Oxidized Cellulose Nanofiber-Based Nanocomposite Papers for Facile In Situ Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Detection. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 15640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yilmaz, M.; Senlik, E.; Biskin, E.; Yavuz, M.S.; Tamer, U.; Demirel, G. Combining 3-D Plasmonic Gold Nanorod Arrays with Colloidal Nanoparticles as a Versatile Concept for Reliable, Sensitive, and Selective Molecular Detection by SERS. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 5563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Park, S.; Lee, J.; Ko, H. Transparent and Flexible Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) Sensors Based on Gold Nanostar Arrays Embedded in Silicon Rubber Film. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 44088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Schwenk, N.; Mizaikoff, B.; Cárdenas, S.; López-Lorente, Á.I. Gold-Nanostar-Based SERS Substrates for Studying Protein Aggregation Processes. Analyst 2018, 143, 5103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Qiu, H.; Huo, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhang, C.; Chen, P.; Jiang, S.; Xu, S.; Ma, Y.; Wang, S.; Li, H. Surface- Enhanced Raman Scattering Based on Controllable-Layer Graphene Shells Directly Synthesized on Cu Nanoparticles for Molecular Detection. ChemPhysChem 2015, 16, 2953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Zhang, E.; Xing, Z.; Wan, D.; Gao, H.; Han, Y.; Gao, Y.; Hu, H.; Cheng, Z.; Liu, T. Surface- Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Chips Based on Two-Dimensional Materials beyond Graphene. J. Semicond. 2021, 42, 51001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Oliverio, M.; Perotto, S.; Messina, G.C.; Lovato, L.; De Angelis, F. Chemical Functionalization of Plasmonic Surface Biosensors: A Tutorial Review on Issues, Strategies, and Costs. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 29394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, S.; Geryak, R.; Geldmeier, J.; Kim, S.; Tsukruk, V.V. Synthesis, Assembly, and Applications of Hybrid Nanostructures for Biosensing. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 12942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kwon, G.; Kim, J.; Kim, D.; Ko, Y.; Yamauchi, Y.; You, J. Nanoporous Cellulose Paper-Based SERS Platform for Multiplex Detection of Hazardous Pesticides. Cellulose 2019, 26, 4935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Du, J.; Jing, C. Preparation of Thiol Modified Fe3O4@Ag Magnetic SERS Probe for PAHs Detection and Identification. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 17829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Raja, S.S.; Cheng, C.-W.; Sang, Y.; Chen, C.-A.; Zhang, X.-Q.; Dubey, A.; Yen, T.-J.; Chang, Y.-M.; Lee, Y.-H.; Gwo, S. Epitaxial Aluminum Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Substrates for Large-Scale 2D Material Characterization. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 8838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jin, B.; He, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y. Lotus Seedpod Inspired SERS Substrates: A Novel Platform Consisting of 3D Sub-10 Nm Annular Hot Spots for Ultrasensitive SERS Detection. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018, 6, 1800056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tong, L.; Xu, H.; Käll, M. Nanogaps for SERS Applications. MRS Bull. 2014, 39, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Luo, W.; Xiong, W.; Han, Y.; Yan, X.; Mai, L. Application of Two-Dimensional Layered Materials in Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022, 24, 26398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, M.; Liu, D.; Du, X.; Lo, K.H.; Wang, S.; Zhou, B.; Pan, H. 2D Materials: Excellent Substrates for Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) in Chemical Sensing and Biosensing. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2020, 130, 115983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moe, Y.A.; Sun, Y.; Ye, H.; Liu, K.; Wang, R. Probing Evolution of Local Strain at MoS2-Metal Boundaries by Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 40246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shinde, S.M.; Das, T.; Hoang, A.T.; Sharma, B.K.; Chen, X.; Ahn, J.-H. Surface- Functionalization-Mediated Direct Transfer of Molybdenum Disulfide for Large-Area Flexible Devices. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1706231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sun, H.; Yao, M.; Liu, S.; Song, Y.; Shen, F.; Dong, J.; Yao, Z.; Zhao, B.; Liu, B. SERS Selective Enhancement on Monolayer MoS2 Enabled by a Pressure-Induced Shift from Resonance to Charge Transfer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 26551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lu, D.; Chen, Y.; Kong, L.; Luo, C.; Lu, Z.; Tao, Q.; Song, W.; Ma, L.; Li, Z.; Li, W.; et al. Strain-Plasmonic Coupled Broadband Photodetector Based on Monolayer MoS2. Small 2022, 18, 2107104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Xiang, J.; Ali, R.N.; Yang, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Xiang, B.; Cui, X. Monolayer MoS2 Thermoelectric Properties Engineering via Strain Effect. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2019, 109, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Huang, Z.; Lu, N.; Wang, Z.; Xu, S.; Guan, J.; Hu, Y. Large-Scale Ultrafast Strain Engineering of CVD-Grown Two-Dimensional Materials on Strain Self-Limited Deformable Nanostructures toward Enhanced Field-Effect Transistors. Nano Lett. 2022, 22, 7734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, H.; Cui, L.; Chen, S.; Guo, M.; Lu, S.; Xiang, Y. A New Perspective on Metal Particles Enhanced MoS2 Photocatalysis in Hydrogen Evolution: Excited Electric Field by Surface Plasmon Resonance. J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 126, 15101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xu, H. Enhanced Light–Matter Interaction of a MoS2 Monolayer with a Gold Mirror Layer. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 23109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wen, L.; Xu, R.; Mi, Y.; Lei, Y. Multiple Nanostructures Based on Anodized Aluminium Oxide Templates. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017, 12, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Robatjazi, H.; Bahauddin, S.M.; Macfarlan, L.H.; Fu, S.; Thomann, I. Ultrathin AAO Membrane as a Generic Template for Sub-100 Nm Nanostructure Fabrication. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 4546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tian, G.; Chen, D.; Yao, J.; Luo, Q.; Fan, Z.; Zeng, M.; Zhang, Z.; Dai, J.; Gao, X.; Liu, J.-M. BiFeO3 Nanorings Synthesized via AAO Template-Assisted Pulsed Laser Deposition and Ion Beam Etching. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 41210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tsai, M.-L.; Su, S.-H.; Chang, J.-K.; Tsai, D.-S.; Chen, C.-H.; Wu, C.-I.; Li, L.-J.; Chen, L.-J.; He, J.-H. Monolayer MoS2 Heterojunction Solar Cells. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 8317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chen, S.; Kim, S.; Chen, W.; Yuan, J.; Bashir, R.; Lou, J.; van der Zande, A.M.; King, W.P. Monolayer MoS2 Nanoribbon Transistors Fabricated by Scanning Probe Lithography. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Splendiani, A.; Sun, L.; Zhang, Y.; Li, T.; Kim, J.; Chim, C.-Y.; Galli, G.; Wang, F. Emerging Photoluminescence in Monolayer MoS2. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yang, F.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Y. Effects of laser power and substrate on the Raman shift of carbon-nanotube papers. Carbon Trends 2020, 1, 100009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lee, C.; Yan, H.; Brus, L.E.; Heinz, T.F.; Hone, J.; Ryu, S. Anomalous Lattice Vibrations of Single- and Few-Layer MoS2. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Conley, H.J.; Wang, B.; Ziegler, J.I.; Haglund, R.F.J.; Pantelides, S.T.; Bolotin, K.I. Bandgap Engineering of Strained Monolayer and Bilayer MoS2. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 3626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Xiao, S.; Xiao, P.; Zhang, X. Atomic-layer soft plasma etching of MoS2. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Carvalho, B.R.; Wang, Y.; Mignuzzi, S.; Roy, D.; Terrones, M.; Fantini, C.; Crespi, V.H.; Malard, L.M.; Pimenta, M.A. Intervalley Scattering by Acoustic Phonons in Two-Dimensional MoS2 Revealed by Double-Resonance Raman Spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lin, J.D.; Han, C.; Wang, F.; Wang, R.; Xiang, D.; Qin, S.; Zhang, X.-A.; Wang, L.; Zhang, H.; Wee, A.T.S.; et al. Electron-Doping-Enhanced Trion Formation in Monolayer Molybdenum Disulfide Functionalized with Cesium Carbonate. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 5323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kiriya, D.; Tosun, M.; Zhao, P.; Kang, J.S.; Javey, A. Air-Stable Surface Charge Transfer Doping of MoS2 by Benzyl Viologen. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 7853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Pak, S.; Lee, J.; Lee, Y.-W.; Jang, A.-R.; Ahn, S.; Ma, K.Y.; Cho, Y.; Hong, J.; Lee, S.; Jeong, H.Y.; et al. Strain-Mediated Interlayer Coupling Effects on the Excitonic Behaviors in an Epitaxially Grown MoS2/WS2 van Der Waals Heterobilayer. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 5634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Frank, O.; Tsoukleri, G.; Parthenios, J.; Papagelis, K.; Riaz, I.; Jalil, R.; Novoselov, K.S.; Galiotis, C. Compression Behavior of Single-Layer Graphenes. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dadgar, A.M.; Scullion, D.; Kang, K.; Esposito, D.; Yang, E.H.; Herman, I.P.; Pimenta, M.A.; Santos, E.-J.G.; Pasupathy, A.N. Strain Engineering and Raman Spectroscopy of Monolayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 5148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Meng, X.; Pandey, T.; Jeong, J.; Fu, S.; Yang, J.; Chen, K.; Singh, A.; He, F.; Xu, X.; Zhou, J.; et al. Thermal Conductivity Enhancement in MoS2 under Extreme Strain. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 122, 155901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chakraborty, B.; Bera, A.; Muthu, D.V.S.; Bhowmick, S.; Waghmare, U.V.; Sood, A.K. Symmetry-Dependent Phonon Renormalization in Monolayer MoS2 Transistor. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 161403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Velický, M.; Rodriguez, A.; Bouša, M.; Krayev, A.V.; Vondráček, M.; Honolka, J.; Ahmadi, M.; Donnelly, G.E.; Huang, F.; Abruña, H.D.; et al. Strain and Charge Doping Fingerprints of the Strong Interaction between Monolayer MoS2 and Gold. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 6112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Gołasa, K.; Grzeszczyk, M.; Binder, J.; Bożek, R.; Wysmołek, A.; Babiński, A. The Disorder- Induced Raman Scattering in Au/MoS2 Heterostructures. AIP Adv. 2015, 5, 77120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, Z.; Lv, Y.; Ren, L.; Li, J.; Kong, L.; Zeng, Y.; Tao, Q.; Wu, R.; Ma, H.; Zhao, B.; et al. Efficient Strain Modulation of 2D Materials via Polymer Encapsulation. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Yu, M.-W.; Ishii, S.; Li, S.; Ku, C.-J.; Chen, S.-Y.; Nagao, T.; Chen, K.-P. Enhancing Raman Spectra by Coupling Plasmons and Excitons for Large Area MoS2 Monolayers. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 605, 154767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cook, A.L.; Haycook, C.P.; Locke, A.K.; Mu, R.R.; Giorgio, T.D. Optimization of electron beam-deposited silver nanoparticles on zinc oxide for maximally surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nanoscale Adv. 2021, 3, 407–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Guo, S.; Cao, H.; Yang, Y.; Wang, M. Silver nanoparticles modified on cicada wings affect fluorescence and Raman signals based on electromagnetic and chemical enhancement mechanisms. Opt. Laser Technol. 2025, 181, 111912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Irfan, I.; Golovynskyi, S.; Yeshchenko, O.A.; Bosi, M.; Zhou, T.; Xue, B.; Li, B.; Qu, J.; Seravalli, L. Plasmonic enhancement of exciton and trion photoluminescence in 2D MoS2 decorated with Au nanorods: Impact of nonspherical shape. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2022, 140, 115213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zheng, H.; Li, M.; Chen, B.; Sangho, B.; Joseph, C.M.; Gangopadhyay, K.; Gangopadhyay, S. Surface-Plasmon-Enhanced Raman and Photoluminescence of Few-Layers and Bulk MoS2 on Silver Grating. In Proceedings of the Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO): Applications and Technology 2016, San Jose, CA, USA, 5–10 June 2016; p. JW2A.111. [Google Scholar]
  54. Li, D.; Lu, H.; Li, Y.; Shi, S.; Yue, Z.; Zhao, J. Plasmon-Enhanced Photoluminescence from MoS2 Monolayer with Topological Insulator Nanoparticle. Nanophotonics 2022, 11, 995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Su, L.; Bradley, L.; Yu, Y.; Yu, Y.; Cao, L.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Y. Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering of Monolayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides on Ag Nanorod Arrays. Opt. Lett. 2019, 44, 5493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Farhat, P.; Avilés, M.O.; Legge, S.; Wang, Z.; Sham, T.K.; Lagugné-Labarthet, F. Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy and Tip-Enhanced Photoluminescence of MoS2 Flakes Decorated with Gold Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2022, 126, 7086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kim, J.H.; Lee, J.; Park, S.; Seo, C.; Yun, S.J.; Han, G.H.; Kim, J.; Lee, Y.H.; Lee, H.S. Locally Enhanced Light–Matter Interaction of MoS2 Monolayers at Density-Controllable Nanogrooves of Template-Stripped Ag Films. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2022, 33, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hao, Q.; Pang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Ma, L.; Schmidt, O.G. Boosting the Photoluminescence of Monolayer MoS2 on High-Density Nanodimer Arrays with Sub-10 Nm Gap. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018, 6, 1700984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, Z.; Dong, Z.; Gu, Y.; Chang, Y.-H.; Zhang, L.; Li, L.-J.; Zhao, W.; Eda, G.; Zhang, W.; Grinblat, G.; et al. Giant Photoluminescence Enhancement in Tungsten-Diselenide–Gold Plasmonic Hybrid Structures. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Akselrod, G.M.; Ming, T.; Argyropoulos, C.; Hoang, T.B.; Lin, Y.; Ling, X.; Smith, D.R.; Kong, J.; Mikkelsen, M.H. Leveraging Nanocavity Harmonics for Control of Optical Processes in 2D Semiconductors. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 3578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Flexible nanotip array. (a) Schematic diagram of fabrication process of flexible nanotip array. SEM images of (b) low and (c) high aspect ratio Ag nanotip array fabricated by direct and angle deposition, respectively (scale bar: 100 nm). (d) Distribution of diameter and inter-tip gap of nanotip array sample.
Figure 1. Flexible nanotip array. (a) Schematic diagram of fabrication process of flexible nanotip array. SEM images of (b) low and (c) high aspect ratio Ag nanotip array fabricated by direct and angle deposition, respectively (scale bar: 100 nm). (d) Distribution of diameter and inter-tip gap of nanotip array sample.
Biosensors 14 00619 g001
Figure 2. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering of 1L MoS2 enabled by nanotip array. (a) Optical microscope image of monolayer, bilayer (2L), and few-layer MoS2 on nanotip array. Scale bar: 10 um. (b) Top view FESEM images of nanotip covered with 1L MoS2. Scale bar: 500 nm. (c) FEM simulation of field confinement in between nanotips of low (left) and high (right) aspect ratio. (d) Raman spectra of 1L MoS2 on PET (left), low aspect ratio (middle), and high aspect ratio nanotips (right).
Figure 2. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering of 1L MoS2 enabled by nanotip array. (a) Optical microscope image of monolayer, bilayer (2L), and few-layer MoS2 on nanotip array. Scale bar: 10 um. (b) Top view FESEM images of nanotip covered with 1L MoS2. Scale bar: 500 nm. (c) FEM simulation of field confinement in between nanotips of low (left) and high (right) aspect ratio. (d) Raman spectra of 1L MoS2 on PET (left), low aspect ratio (middle), and high aspect ratio nanotips (right).
Biosensors 14 00619 g002
Figure 3. Tunable SERS platform based on 1L MoS2/Nanotip. (a) Schematic diagram describing tuning methodology of SERS of 1L MoS2/nanotip (top), strain-dependent Raman spectra of 1L MoS2/PET (middle), and 1L MoS2/nanotip (bottom). (b) Extracted strain-dependent Raman mode peak position, FWHM, intensity of 1L MoS2/PET, and 1L MoS2/nanotip. (c) FEM simulation of nanotip array showing stress concentration in between tips under inward bending. (d) Digital images of sample (left) and FEM simulation (right) of field confinement in between tips under inward bent (top), flat (middle), and outward bent (bottom) conditions (scale bar: 20 mm).
Figure 3. Tunable SERS platform based on 1L MoS2/Nanotip. (a) Schematic diagram describing tuning methodology of SERS of 1L MoS2/nanotip (top), strain-dependent Raman spectra of 1L MoS2/PET (middle), and 1L MoS2/nanotip (bottom). (b) Extracted strain-dependent Raman mode peak position, FWHM, intensity of 1L MoS2/PET, and 1L MoS2/nanotip. (c) FEM simulation of nanotip array showing stress concentration in between tips under inward bending. (d) Digital images of sample (left) and FEM simulation (right) of field confinement in between tips under inward bent (top), flat (middle), and outward bent (bottom) conditions (scale bar: 20 mm).
Biosensors 14 00619 g003
Figure 4. Tunable SERS platform based on nanoparticles/1L MoS2/nanotip. (a) Schematic diagram describing the tunable SERS platform based on nanoparticles/1L MoS2/nanotip. (b) SEM image of nanoparticle on nanotip sample (scale bar: 100 nm). (c) Compressive strain-induced Raman spectra of nanoparticles/1L MoS2/nanotip. (d) Extracted strain-dependent Raman mode peak position, FWHM, and intensity of nanoparticles/1L MoS2/nanotip.
Figure 4. Tunable SERS platform based on nanoparticles/1L MoS2/nanotip. (a) Schematic diagram describing the tunable SERS platform based on nanoparticles/1L MoS2/nanotip. (b) SEM image of nanoparticle on nanotip sample (scale bar: 100 nm). (c) Compressive strain-induced Raman spectra of nanoparticles/1L MoS2/nanotip. (d) Extracted strain-dependent Raman mode peak position, FWHM, and intensity of nanoparticles/1L MoS2/nanotip.
Biosensors 14 00619 g004
Figure 5. Active control of enhancement factors. (a) Strain dependent enhancement factors of nanoparticle/1L MoS2/nanotip and 1L MoS2/nanotip. (b) Depth of modulation of enhancement factor. (c) Finite element simulation of 1L MoS2/nanotip for various inter-dot gap sizes. (d) Literature survey of enhancement factor of 1L MoS2 and comparison with this work.
Figure 5. Active control of enhancement factors. (a) Strain dependent enhancement factors of nanoparticle/1L MoS2/nanotip and 1L MoS2/nanotip. (b) Depth of modulation of enhancement factor. (c) Finite element simulation of 1L MoS2/nanotip for various inter-dot gap sizes. (d) Literature survey of enhancement factor of 1L MoS2 and comparison with this work.
Biosensors 14 00619 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, Y.B.; Behera, S.; Lee, D.; Namgung, S.; Park, K.-D.; Kim, D.-S.; Das, B. Active Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Platform Based on a 2D Material–Flexible Nanotip Array. Biosensors 2024, 14, 619. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14120619

AMA Style

Kim YB, Behera S, Lee D, Namgung S, Park K-D, Kim D-S, Das B. Active Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Platform Based on a 2D Material–Flexible Nanotip Array. Biosensors. 2024; 14(12):619. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14120619

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Yong Bin, Satyabrat Behera, Dukhyung Lee, Seon Namgung, Kyoung-Duck Park, Dai-Sik Kim, and Bamadev Das. 2024. "Active Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Platform Based on a 2D Material–Flexible Nanotip Array" Biosensors 14, no. 12: 619. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14120619

APA Style

Kim, Y. B., Behera, S., Lee, D., Namgung, S., Park, K. -D., Kim, D. -S., & Das, B. (2024). Active Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Platform Based on a 2D Material–Flexible Nanotip Array. Biosensors, 14(12), 619. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14120619

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop