Next Article in Journal
A Liposomal Platform for Sensing of Extracellular Analytes Near Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Diabetes by Volatile Organic Compounds in Urine Using FAIMS and Fox4000 Electronic Nose
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Use of Electronic Noses in Seawater Quality Monitoring: A Systematic Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cerium Oxide-Tungsten Oxide Core-Shell Nanowire-Based Microsensors Sensitive to Acetone

1
Instituto de Microelectrónica de Barcelona (IMB-CNM, CSIC), Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
2
CEITEC-Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, 61200 Brno, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2018, 8(4), 116; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios8040116
Submission received: 31 October 2018 / Revised: 17 November 2018 / Accepted: 19 November 2018 / Published: 23 November 2018

Abstract

:
Gas sensitive cerium oxide-tungsten oxide core-shell nanowires are synthesized and integrated directly into micromachined platforms via aerosol assisted chemical vapor deposition. Tests to various volatile organic compounds (acetone, ethanol, and toluene) involved in early disease diagnosis demonstrate enhanced sensitivity to acetone for the core-shell structures in contrast to the non-modified materials (i.e., only tungsten oxide or cerium oxide). This is attributed to the high density of oxygen vacancy defects at the shell, as well as the formation of heterojunctions at the core-shell interface, which provide the modified nanowires with ‘extra’ chemical and electronic sensitization as compared to the non-modified materials.

1. Introduction

Odor (gas, vapor, aroma) detection systems are of high interest as they are non-invasive key-enabling technologies, which are relevant in both traditional (e.g., environment, industry) and innovative applications such as the early detection of diseases from exhaled breath [1,2]. The literature related to exhaled breath as bio information for disease diagnosis has shown previously that human breath contains more than two hundred different gases and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) species that vary from person to person [3]. In the midst of a wide range of analytes, acetone, toluene, and ethanol are within the most relevant VOCs that are typically involved in various diseases, including diabetes and cancer. Thus, for instance, high acetone concentrations (~21 ppm) have been identified in the exhaled breath of diabetic patients, as compared to healthy patients (~2.7 ppm) and oppositely to patients with lung cancer, who showed lower acetone concentrations (~0.9 ppm). Similarly, the ethanol concentration in breath has shown an increase (~2.1 ppm) in patients with lung/breast cancer and diabetes with respect to healthy patients (~0.2 ppm) [4,5,6].
Currently, the analysis of breath is still an emerging diagnosis technology that uses large and expensive laboratory equipment such as gas-chromatograph, ion-mobility and/or mass spectrometers [7]. In the future, however, miniaturized, portable, and wearable systems with enhanced functionality (sensitivity, selectivity, and stability) and high autonomy at a low cost could substitute this equipment; a fact that demands the innovation of current odor detection systems. In this context, metal oxide (MOX) gas sensors based on the chemoresistive principle represent an alternative to bulky equipment providing simpler architecture and fabrication processes compatible with ‘standard’ MEMS and CMOS technologies [2]. Chemoresistive gas sensors devices generally consist of a transducing platform (microscale) and a gas sensitive MOX optimized to interact with specific groups of gaseous or vapor analytes. However, among the diverse issues that may potentially be addressed to improve the functionality of these monitoring systems (e.g., optimization of sensing modes and control electronics or the integration of smart systems with new micro/nano fabrication concepts), the focus on nanoscaled sensitive materials is still essential to radically improve their performance. Thus, several studies have demonstrated that MOXs modified with second-phase constituents, either nanosized noble metals or other MOXs, have a positive effect on the sensing properties of both the host MOX and the second-phase constituent, particularly when the size of both materials is within the Debye length of the surface (typically on the order of 2−100 nm) [8]. Moreover, recently, it has been pointed out that the modification of a MOX with noble metals or other MOXs allows for the formation of nanoscale heterojunctions and, in turn, sensing mechanisms dominated not only by the surface, but also the interface, which has proved to improve the sensing properties of these materials [9].
In recent years, tungsten oxide has demonstrated high potential in gas sensing among traditional gas sensitive MOXs such as SnO2 and ZnO (Figure 1), showing a strong sensitivity to oxidizing gases including nitrogen dioxide and ozone [10]. Moreover, the modification of tungsten oxide with second-phase constituents such us platinum, copper oxide, or iron oxide has shown an improved sensitivity and selectivity to reducing species including hydrogen [11], hydrogen sulfide [12] or toluene [13], respectively. As far as cerium oxide is concerned, the peculiarity that makes this oxide also attractive in gas sensors reside overall in the defect sites caused by the valence state changes between Ce4+ and Ce3+, which considerably alter the concentration of oxygen vacancies, and provides a good redox behavior and catalytic activity [14,15,16]. However, and despite these favorable surface properties the use of cerium oxide in gas sensing is still infrequent (Figure 1) and its sensing properties upon VOCs have not been fully explored in the literature related to gas sensors.
Optimized gas sensitive MOXs need synthetic methods able to produce well defined and even structures. Additive (bottom-up) synthetic methods, as opposed to subtractive (top-down) methods, are ideal for this task and industrially attractive as they provide the ability to generate films in a continuous mode with high purities and high throughput. Aerosol assisted (AA) chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is a versatile additive synthetic method used previously to obtain non-modified (e.g., WO3) or metal/MOX modified MOXs (e.g., Pt/WO3, Fe2O3/WO3) [11,13]. Additionally, recently, the AACVD of cerium oxide from Ce (dbm)4 has been proved as a strategy to overcome the low volatility of traditional cerium CVD precursors [17]. In this work, however, we achieve the AACVD of cerium oxide from Ce (acac)3 precursor and use this route to synthesize cerium oxide-tungsten oxide core-shell nanowires in a two-step process performed directly on silicon-based micromachined platforms. In addition, we validate the sensing properties of these systems to acetone, and other relevant VOCs monitored in early disease diagnosis.

2. Materials and Methods

Tungsten oxide (non-modified nanowires), cerium oxide (non-modified porous films), and cerium oxide-tungsten oxide core-shell nanowires were grown directly onto micromachined transducing platforms (Figure 2a) [18] using the AACVD system described previously [19]. AACVD is a variant of the conventional CVD technique, which uses aerosol to transport dissolved precursors to a heated reaction zone. Here, the non-modified tungsten oxide nanowires films were deposited at 350 °C from a solution of tungsten hexacarbonyl (30 mg, W(CO)6, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, ≥97%) and methanol (5 mL Sigma-Aldrich, ≥99.6%), whereas the non-modified cerium oxide films were deposited at 500 °C from cerium (III) acetylacetonate hydrate (28 mg, Ce (acac)3·×H2O, Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in methanol (2 ml, Sigma-Aldrich). On the other hand, the cerium oxide-tungsten oxide core-shell nanowires were achieved using a two-step AACVD process [20], in which the tungsten oxide nanowire cores were deposited at 350 °C in the first step and the cerium oxide shell film at 500 °C in the second step employing the same protocols described above for the non-modified films. Finally, the non-modified and modified films were annealed at 500 °C in air.
The morphology of the films was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM— Auriga Series, 3 KV, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and the phase using X-ray Diffraction (XRD–Bruker-AXS, model A25 D8 Discover, Cu Kα radiation, Billerica, MA, USA). Further analysis of the material was carried out using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS—Kratos Axis Supra with monochromatic Al Kα X-ray radiation, an emission current of 15 mA and hybrid lens mode, Manchester, UK). The survey and detailed spectra were measured using pass energy of 80 eV and 20 eV, respectively. The band gap of the films was estimated by measuring the diffuse reflectance (AvaSpec-UV/VIS/NIR, Avantes, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands) of the films and performing Kubelka–Munk transformation.
The microsensors were tested in a continuous flow test chamber provided with mass flow controllers that allow the mixture of dry/humid air and calibrated gaseous analytes (ethanol, acetone, toluene, carbon monoxide and hydrogen purchased from Praxair, Danbury, CT, USA) to obtain the desired concentration. To have a proper control of the relative humidity (RH) inside the gas test chamber, an evaluation kit (EK-H4, Sensirion AG, Stäfa, Switzerland) with a humidity sensor was also used. The dc resistance measurements of the microsensor were achieved in a system provided with an electrometer (Keathley 6517A, Cleveland, OH, USA) and a multimeter (Keathley 2700, Cleveland, OH, USA) with switch system to monitor various sensors simultaneously. More details of the characterization systems were reported elsewhere [18]. The sensor response was defined as Ra/Rg, where Ra and Rg are the resistance in dry/humid air and the resistance after 600 s of analyte exposure, respectively. The sensors were tested for a period of one month during which each sensor accumulated 180 h of operation under the different conditions (analytes, temperatures, humidity) employed.

3. Results

3.1. Gas Sensitive Films

SEM imaging of the microsensors after AACVD of the gas sensitive structures showed uniform deposited films that covered the electrodes integrated into the micromachined membrane (Figure 2a). A close view of the non-modified tungsten oxide wires (W) showed bare and even surfaces as noticed previously for other AACVD tungsten oxide structures [21]. In contrast, a close view of the cerium oxide-tungsten oxide core-shell wires (Ce/W) displayed the presence of a rugged thin film covering the wire surface (Figure 2b,c), similarly to that observed when depositing non-modified cerium-based films (Ce) from a Ce (acac)3 methanolic solution via AACVD (Figure 2d).
Generally, AACVD of the non-modified (W and Ce) and modified (Ce/W) films showed a good adherence to the substrate, with the wire-like morphology films (i.e., W and Ce/W) forming a mat-like network of non-aligned nanowires with diameters below 100 nm, and the particle-like morphology films (i.e., Ce) displaying a porous surface composed of grains with diameters below 40 nm. The as-deposited non-modified W films displayed a bluish color, whereas the Ce/W films displayed a dark yellowish to dark green color, similarly to the color observed on the Ce films. However, after annealing the non-modified W and modified Ce/W films became whitish and pale yellowish, respectively. Figure 3 displays the diffuse reflectance spectra of the films deposited without modification (i.e., only tungsten oxide or only cerium oxide) via AACVD. These measurements and their corresponding Kubelka–Munk transformation indicated optical band gaps at ~3.2 eV for the tungsten oxide films and ~3.1 eV for the cerium oxide films, in agreement with the literature band gap values of tungsten oxide (2.6–3.7 eV) [22] and cerium oxide (2.7–3.4 eV) [15].
XRD analysis of the films revealed the presence of a monoclinic-phase (International Centre of Diffraction Data–ICDD card no. 72-0677) in the W and Ce/W films with greatly enhanced intensity (preferred orientation) in the [001] direction, consistent with our previous results for AACVD of tungsten oxide [13]. A weak diffraction peak was also noticed at 47.8° 2θ for the Ce/W films (Figure 4). This diffraction peak is in line with the pattern identified on the non-modified Ce based films corresponding to cerium dioxide (Crystallography Open Database–COD ID card no. 7217887).
The XPS of both W and Ce/W films exhibited typical W 4f7/2, W 4f5/2 and W 5p3/2 XPS core level peaks (Figure 5a), consistent with the literature and previous tungsten oxide nanowires synthetized via AACVD [13]. XPS narrow scan spectra of the Ce 3d core level peaks at the Ce and Ce/W wires displayed multiplet splitting between 875 and 920 eV in agreement with the standard binding energies for Ce 3d peaks and partially reduced cerium oxide [23,24]. Figure 5b displays the experimental data and the corresponding deconvolution of the Ce 3d spectrum recorded on the Ce/W wires. The peaks v, v’’ and v’’’ are attributed to the main and satellite peaks of the Ce4+ state, whereas the peaks v0, v’ correspond to the peaks of Ce3+ state. The relative contribution of Ce4+ and Ce3+ species at the Ce/W films was estimated from the ratio of integrated Ce4+ peaks to the total Ce4+ and Ce3+ peaks, finding a value of ~42% for Ce4+ and 58% Ce3+ species. The relatively high amount of Ce3+ species indicate a charge imbalance with oxygen vacancy defects and an unsaturated chemical bond at the Ce/W film suggesting a high redox nature of the film.
Linear extrapolation of the valence band (VB) leading edge on the XPS spectra recorded on the Ce/W film near the Fermi level (EB = 0) indicates the simultaneous presence of both cerium oxide and tungsten oxide induced VB (Figure 6a). One can notice that the VB onset for cerium oxide occurs ~0.5 eV (ΔEV) above the VB onset for tungsten oxide. Therefore, according to the band gap estimated by diffuse reflectance for each non-modified material in the position of the conduction band (CB) of cerium oxide is ~0.4 eV (ΔEC) above the CB of tungsten oxide, consequently suggesting a staggered type of heterojunction at the interface of the Ce/W core-shell structures (Figure 6b). In contrast, the linear extrapolation of VB leading edge on the XPS spectra of the W and Ce films showed only the presence of tungsten oxide induced VB at 2.9 eV in agreement with previous reports [13].
In brief, the characterization of the films deposited via AACVD demonstrates the formation of crystalline cerium oxide-tungsten oxide core-shell wires with a relatively high amount of Ce3+ species at the surface and the presence of the characteristic valence band onsets for cerium oxide and tungsten oxide.

3.2. Gas Sensing Tests

Overall, the sensors displayed an n-type response with a good reproducibility to the target gaseous analytes (acetone, ethanol, toluene, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen) and relatively low variations of the baseline resistance along the testing period. Gas sensing tests of the microsensors were carried out at various operating temperatures from 150 °C to 400 °C by DC resistance measurements of the films integrated via AACVD. These test proved a better sensor functionality to 80 ppm of acetone at 300 °C for the sensors based on W and Ce/W films and 400 °C for the sensors based on Ce films. As the Ce based sensors registered comparatively higher baseline resistances (~40 GΩ at 400 °C) than W (13 kΩ at 300 °C) and Ce/W (65 kΩ at 300 °C) sensors, additionally requiring higher temperatures to achieve the maximum responses (e.g., response to acetone 4.9 at 400 °C for the Ce sensors and 5.6 at 300 °C for the Ce/W sensors), further analyses related to the analyte concentration and humidity dependence of the sensor response were performed only for the W and Ce/W based sensors at 300 °C.
Figure 7a displays the sensor response to 80 ppm of each analyte and type of sensor at 300 °C. These results show the improved responses registered for the Ce/W sensors, as opposed to the W sensors, as well as the higher responses to acetone compared to the rest of the analytes. Results in Figure 7a also suggests an improved selectivity for the Ce/W films with lower cross-responses among the analytes; for instance, the difference of the response to acetone in relation to ethanol is 1.6 for the Ce/W films and 1 for the W films. The low cross response registered on the Ce/W sensor is noticed in more detail in Figure 7b, in which is displayed the analysis of variance (ANOVA) realized for a data set comprising four replicates for each type of sensor and analyte. Additionally, the principal component (PC) analysis performed using replicated responses of both sensors (i.e., W and Ce/W) to each analyte is represented in Figure 8. These results, specifically the scores, which correspond to the projections of the measurements in an orthogonal base of PCs, indicate the possibility to improve the discrimination of the analytes by using an array of W and Ce/W based sensors.
Further tests of the sensors to various concentrations of each analyte showed direct proportional changes in the response to concentration. An example of the response registered with both types of sensors to acetone is shown in Figure 9. For these conditions, the limit of detection corresponding to three times the noise level [25] was estimated at 1 ppm for W and 0.2 ppm for Ce/W sensors. Overall, the changes respect to concentration for the W sensors proved a lower sensitivity compared to the W/Ce sensors, which demonstrates a better sensitivity to the analytes. The sensitivity (S), defined as the ratio between the change in response (ΔR) and a fixed change in analyte concentration (ΔC) for each sensor and analyte, was registered to be nearly five times higher for acetone and three times higher for ethanol when using the cerium-modified sensors (found ΔR/ΔCacetone for W sensors 0.8%, Ce/W sensors 4.7%; ΔR/ΔCethanol for W sensors 0.8%, Ce/W sensors 2.2%).
Additional tests of the sensors in a controlled humid ambient (10 and 20% RH), consistent with those reported after preconditioning the relative humidity in breath samples [26], registered lower sensor response to the analytes. The loss of response in humid ambient is a consequence of the proportional drop of the baseline resistance to relative humidity. This proportional change is usually present in metal oxides exposed to humidity due to the formation of hydroxyl groups at temperatures above 100 °C [18]. Currently, most of the strategies to attenuate further the humidity interference from the material point of view are connected with the fine tune of the MOX morphology [27] and/or the incorporation of humidity-insensitive additives (e.g., NiO [28], CuO [12], or SiO2 [29]). Figure 10 displays the typical resistance changes for the W and Ce/W sensors to each mixture of RH and acetone tested and their replicates.
Previous reports in the literature related to acetone sensing using modified tungsten oxide films (with Au, Pd, AuPd) suggest the functionality of tungsten oxide at 300 °C for relatively high acetone concentrations (200–1000 ppm) [30]. Further tests, also performed on tungsten oxide, modified with TiO2 [31] or Si [32] show the functionality of the sensors at similar (30 ppm) or lower (100–600 ppb) acetone concentrations, respectively, although requiring higher operating temperatures (400–500 °C), than those needed in this work. On the other hand, the use of cerium oxide as the gas sensitive element has been rarely reported in the literature, with the performance of this material having indicated the potential for sensing VOCs including acetone [33,34]. In general, the responses of the above mentioned non-miniaturized acetone sensors in the literature [30,31,32,33,34] are in the same order of magnitude than our micromachined sensors based on the cerium oxide-tungsten oxide core-shell wires, which suggests the viability of sensor miniaturization without losing the sensitivity of the system when optimizing the sensitive material. In addition, the good reproducibility of the responses during the testing period and the analysis (SEM, XRD) of the samples after the gas sensing experiments (which showed unchanged properties of the material with respect to the properties recorded initially) indicated a good stability of the sensors.
The enhanced functionality recorded on the Ce/W sensors is connected with the formation of heterojunctions at the interface of the tungsten oxide wires and the cerium oxide porous films. These heterojunctions are present due to the different band energies in both MOXs (Figure 6b), which facilitate electron migration from the cerium oxide film to the tungsten oxide wire. Generally, as oxygen is preadsorbed at the sensitive film during air exposure, the surface depletion region (LD) and, in turn, the conduction channel along the wires are narrowed, which leads to lower conductivity along the film (Figure 11a). Alternatively, when a reducing analyte (i.e., VOCs) reacts with the preadsorbed oxygen, electrons are released back to the conduction band, and the depth of the surface depletion is narrowed, increasing the conduction channel along the wire and, in turn, its conductivity (Figure 11b). This mechanism controlled by the pre-adsorbed oxygen is similar for the non-modified and modified films, with the peculiarity that the charge transfer process (electron migration) occurring at the junction of the cerium oxide film and tungsten oxide wire provides larger electron density to the wires (accumulation layer) in the pre-adsorption cycle (as opposed to the non-modified W or Ce films). This allows for larger changes of the depletion layer and an enhanced modulation of the wire conduction channel, which is reflected finally on the sensor response.
In the same line, the lowering of the baseline resistance upon humidity implies a diminution of the chemically active oxygen species at the surface and, in turn, a narrow surface depletion in the air (pre-adsorption). Thus, as the conduction channel in humid ambient is wider than in dry ambient (Figure 11), the conduction changes induced by the reducing gas are less significant, and thus the sensor response is as well.
Summarizing, the gas sensing tests showed improved acetone sensing properties for Ce/W based microsensors showing a higher response, and better sensitivity and selectivity to the analytes tested in relation to the W or Ce based microsensors.

4. Conclusions

These results demonstrate the formation of cerium oxide-tungsten oxide core-shell nanowires with improved response and sensitivity to acetone as compared to non-modified tungsten oxide wires or cerium oxide porous films. Tests of these sensors to acetone in humid ambient showed a drop of the responses as a consequence of the lowering of the baseline resistance due to humidity. Principal component analysis of the responses obtained for each analytes using an array the non-modified and modified sensitive films indicated the possibility to enhance the selectivity of the microsensors by improving the discrimination of analytes. The improved sensitivity is attributed to the formation of heterojunctions at the interface of both oxides (i.e., tungsten oxide and cerium oxide) which leads to an ‘extra’ chemical and electronic sensitization to the modified films as compared to the non-modified films.

Author Contributions

M.T.; synthesis and integration of gas sensitive films, M.S. and S.V.; XPS analysis, M.T. and I.G. diffuse reflectance tests, I.G., E.F. and C.C.; Si-based micromachined platforms; I.G., E.F. and O.C. gas sensing characterization, M.T., M.S. and O.C., literature search, M.T., I.G. and S.V.; writing review and editing, S.V. and C.C.; funding acquisition.

Funding

This work has been supported by the Czech Science Foundation (GAČR) via Grant no. 17-16531S, and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation via the Ramón y Cajal Programme and Grants TEC2015-74329-JIN-(AEI/FEDER,EU) and TEC2016-79898-C6-(AEI/FEDER,EU). This research has used the Spanish ICTS Network MICRONANOFABS (partially funded by MINECO). CEITEC Nano Research Infrastructure (IDLM2015041, MEYS CR, 2016–2019) is also acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brattoli, M.; de Gennaro, G.; de Pinto, V.; Loiotile, A.D.; Lovascio, S.; Penza, M. Odour detection methods: Olfactometry and chemical sensors. Sensors 2011, 11, 5290–5322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Di Natale, C.; Paolesse, R.; Martinelli, E.; Capuano, R. Solid-state gas sensors for breath analysis: A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2014, 824, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Phillips, M.; Herrera, J.; Krishnan, S.; Zain, M.; Greenberg, J.; Cataneo, R.N. Variation in volatile organic compounds in the breath of normal humans. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 1999, 729, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Das, S.; Pal, S.; Mitra, M. Significance of Exhaled Breath Test in Clinical Diagnosis: A Special Focus on the Detection of Diabetes Mellitus. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 2016, 36, 605–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Dent, A.G.; Sutedja, T.G.; Zimmerman, P.V. Exhaled breath analysis for lung cancer. J. Thorac. Dis. 2013, 5, S540–S550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, J.; Peng, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, W.; Jin, Y.; Tang, Z.; Duan, Y. Investigation of potential breath biomarkers for the early diagnosis of breast cancer using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Clin. Chim. Acta 2014, 436, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Van de Kant, K.D.; van der Sande, L.J.; Jöbsis, Q.; van Schayck, O.C.; Dompeling, E. Clinical use of exhaled volatile organic compounds in pulmonary diseases: A systematic review. Respir. Res. 2012, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yamazoe, N. New approaches for improving semiconductor gas sensors. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 1991, 5, 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Miller, D.R.; Akbar, S.A.; Morris, P.A. Nanoscale metal oxide-based heterojunctions for gas sensing: A review. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2014, 204, 250–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vallejos, S.; Khatko, V.; Calderer, J.; Gracia, I.; Canè, C.; Llobet, E.; Correig, X. Micro-machined WO3-based sensors selective to oxidizing gases. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2008, 132, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vallejos, S.; Umek, P.; Stoycheva, T.; Annanouch, F.; Llobet, E.; Correig, X.; De Marco, P.; Bittencourt, C.; Blackman, C. Single-step deposition of Au- and Pt-nanoparticle-functionalized tungsten oxide nanoneedles synthesized via aerosol-assisted CVD, and used for fabrication of selective gas microsensor arrays. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 1313–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Annanouch, F.E.; Haddi, Z.; Vallejos, S.; Umek, P.; Guttmann, P.; Bittencourt, C.; Llobet, E. Aerosol-assisted CVD-grown WO3 nanoneedles decorated with copper oxide nanoparticles for the selective and humidity-resilient detection of H2S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 6842–6851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Vallejos, S.; Gràcia, I.; Figueras, E.; Cané, C. Nanoscale heterostructures based on Fe2O3@WO3-x nanoneedles and their direct integration into flexible transducing platforms for toluene sensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 18638–18649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ma, R.; Jahurul Islam, M.; Amaranatha Reddy, D.; Kim, T.K. Transformation of CeO2 into a mixed phase CeO2/Ce2O3 nanohybrid by liquid phase pulsed laser ablation for enhanced photocatalytic activity through Z-scheme pattern. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 18495–18502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Montini, T.; Melchionna, M.; Monai, M.; Fornasiero, P. Fundamentals and Catalytic Applications of CeO2-Based Materials. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 5987–6041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Magesh, G.; Viswanathan, B.; Viswanath, R.P.; Varadarajan, T.K. Photocatalytic behavior of CeO2-TiO2 system for the degradation of methylene blue. Indian J. Chem. Sect. A 2009, 48A, 480–488. [Google Scholar]
  17. Evans, M.; Di Maggio, F.; Blackman, C.; Sankar, G. AACVD synthesis of catalytic gold nanoparticle-modified cerium(IV) oxide thin films. Phys. Status Solidi C 2015, 12, 996–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Vallejos, S.; Grácia, I.; Chmela, O.; Figueras, E.; Hubálek, J.; Cané, C. Chemoresistive micromachined gas sensors based on functionalized metal oxide nanowires: Performance and reliability. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2016, 235, 525–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Vallejos, S.; Pizúrová, N.; Čechal, J.; Gràcia, I.; Cané, C. Aerosol-assisted chemical vapor deposition of metal oxide structures: Zinc oxide rods. J. Vis. Exp. 2017, 127, 56127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Annanouch, F.E.; Haddi, Z.; Ling, M.; Di Maggio, F.; Vallejos, S.; Vilic, T.; Zhu, Y.; Shujah, T.; Umek, P.; Bittencourt, C.; et al. Aerosol-Assisted CVD-Grown PdO Nanoparticle-Decorated Tungsten Oxide Nanoneedles Extremely Sensitive and Selective to Hydrogen. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 10413–10421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Vallejos, S.; Gràcia, I.; Figueras, E.; Cané, C. Catalyst-free vapor-phase method for direct integration of gas sensing nanostructures with polymeric transducing platforms. J. Nanomaterials 2014, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Watanabe, H.; Fujikata, K.; Oaki, Y.; Imai, H. Band-gap expansion of tungsten oxide quantum dots synthesized in sub-nano porous silica. Chem. Comm. 2013, 49, 8477–8479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mysliveček, J.; Matolín, V.; Matolínová, I. Heteroepitaxy of Cerium Oxide Thin Films on Cu(111). Materials 2015, 8, 6346–6359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Naganuma, T.; Traversa, E. Stability of the Ce3+ valence state in cerium oxide nanoparticle layers. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 4950–4953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Nicolas, J.; Romain, A.-C. Establishing the limit of detection and the resolution limits of odorous sources in the environment for an array of metal oxide gas sensors. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2004, 99, 384–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Prabhakar, A.; Iglesias, R.A.; Shan, X.; Xian, X.; Zhang, L.; Tsow, F.; Forzani, E.S.; Tao, N. Online Sample Conditioning for Portable Breath Analyzers. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 7172–7178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Vallejos, S.; Gràcia, I.; Pizúrová, N.; Figueras, E.; Hubálek, J.; Cané, C. Tuning of the Humidity-Interference in Gas Sensitive Columnar ZnO Structures. Proceedings 2017, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, J.; Yang, P.; Wei, X. High-Performance, Room-Temperature, and No-Humidity-Impact Ammonia Sensor Based on Heterogeneous Nickel Oxide and Zinc Oxide Nanocrystals. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 3816–3824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Niarchos, G.; Dubourg, G.; Afroudakis, G.; Georgopoulos, M.; Tsouti, V.; Makarona, E.; Crnojevic-Bengin, V.; Tsamis, C. Humidity Sensing Properties of Paper Substrates and Their Passivation with ZnO Nanoparticles for Sensor Applications. Sensors 2017, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kim, S.; Park, S.; Park, S.; Lee, C. Acetone sensing of Au and Pd-decorated WO3 nanorod sensors. Sens. Actuator B Chem. 2015, 209, 180–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bertuna, A.; Comini, E.; Poli, N.; Zappa, D.; Sberveglieri, G. Acetone Detection by Chemical Sensors Based on Tungsten and Titanium Oxide Nanowires. Proceedings 2017, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Righettoni, M.; Tricoli, A.; Pratsinis, S.E. Si:WO3 Sensors for Highly Selective Detection of Acetone for Easy Diagnosis of Diabetes by Breath Analysis. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 3581–3587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Pandeeswari, R.; Jeyaprakash, B.G. CeO2 thin film as a low-temperature formaldehyde sensor in mixed vapour environment. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2014, 37, 1293–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nagaraju, P.; Vijayakumar, Y.; Choudhary, R.J.; Ramana Reddy, M.V. Preparation and characterization of nanostructured Gd doped cerium oxide thin films by pulsed laser deposition for acetone sensor application. Mater. Sci. Eng., B 2017, 226, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A survey of the most applicable gas sensitive MOXs reported in the literature (Web of Science database from 1998 to 2018).
Figure 1. A survey of the most applicable gas sensitive MOXs reported in the literature (Web of Science database from 1998 to 2018).
Biosensors 08 00116 g001
Figure 2. The SEM imaging of a (a) gas sensor device, the Ce/W nanowires at (b) low and (c) high magnification, and (d) the non-modified Ce films integrated on the micromachined membrane.
Figure 2. The SEM imaging of a (a) gas sensor device, the Ce/W nanowires at (b) low and (c) high magnification, and (d) the non-modified Ce films integrated on the micromachined membrane.
Biosensors 08 00116 g002
Figure 3. The diffuse reflectance spectra of the aerosol assisted chemical vapor deposited (a) tungsten oxide and (b) cerium oxide films without modification.
Figure 3. The diffuse reflectance spectra of the aerosol assisted chemical vapor deposited (a) tungsten oxide and (b) cerium oxide films without modification.
Biosensors 08 00116 g003
Figure 4. The XRD pattern of the Ce/W films. The diffraction peak at 47.8° 2θ (full pink circle) corresponds to cerium dioxide cubic phase (P1), COD ID card no. 7217887, the rest of the diffraction peaks (full blue squares) in the data can be indexed to a monoclinic phase (P21/n), ICDD card no. 72-0677, with only peaks of greatly enhanced intensity (preferred orientation), specifically indexed.
Figure 4. The XRD pattern of the Ce/W films. The diffraction peak at 47.8° 2θ (full pink circle) corresponds to cerium dioxide cubic phase (P1), COD ID card no. 7217887, the rest of the diffraction peaks (full blue squares) in the data can be indexed to a monoclinic phase (P21/n), ICDD card no. 72-0677, with only peaks of greatly enhanced intensity (preferred orientation), specifically indexed.
Biosensors 08 00116 g004
Figure 5. (a) The W 4f and (b) Ce 3d spectra recorded on the cerium-modified wires. The W 4f spectrum recorded on the non-modified tungsten oxide wires showed similar characteristics.
Figure 5. (a) The W 4f and (b) Ce 3d spectra recorded on the cerium-modified wires. The W 4f spectrum recorded on the non-modified tungsten oxide wires showed similar characteristics.
Biosensors 08 00116 g005
Figure 6. (a) The XPS valence band spectra of the cerium-modified tungsten oxide nanowires, and (b) schematic of the estimated energy level diagram at the interface. ECB and EVB represent the conduction band minimum and the valence band maximum (not to scale).
Figure 6. (a) The XPS valence band spectra of the cerium-modified tungsten oxide nanowires, and (b) schematic of the estimated energy level diagram at the interface. ECB and EVB represent the conduction band minimum and the valence band maximum (not to scale).
Biosensors 08 00116 g006
Figure 7. (a) The radial plot of the sensor response to 80 ppm of acetone, ethanol, toluene, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen using the W and Ce/W based sensors. (b) Box plots of the sensor response to each analyte recorded by the Ce/W based sensors. Each box displays the median and upper and lower quartiles (first and third) of the respective distribution. Box whiskers indicate the dispersion of the measurements.
Figure 7. (a) The radial plot of the sensor response to 80 ppm of acetone, ethanol, toluene, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen using the W and Ce/W based sensors. (b) Box plots of the sensor response to each analyte recorded by the Ce/W based sensors. Each box displays the median and upper and lower quartiles (first and third) of the respective distribution. Box whiskers indicate the dispersion of the measurements.
Biosensors 08 00116 g007
Figure 8. Principal component analysis applied to discriminate the tested VOCs by using an array of non-modified tungsten oxide wires and the cerium oxide-tungsten oxide core-shell wire-based sensors.
Figure 8. Principal component analysis applied to discriminate the tested VOCs by using an array of non-modified tungsten oxide wires and the cerium oxide-tungsten oxide core-shell wire-based sensors.
Biosensors 08 00116 g008
Figure 9. The sensor response to various concentrations (from 20 to 80 ppm) of acetone recorded with the W and Ce/W based sensors.
Figure 9. The sensor response to various concentrations (from 20 to 80 ppm) of acetone recorded with the W and Ce/W based sensors.
Biosensors 08 00116 g009
Figure 10. The resistance changes registered for (a) W and (b) Ce/W to acetone in dry and humid ambient (RH: relative humidity).
Figure 10. The resistance changes registered for (a) W and (b) Ce/W to acetone in dry and humid ambient (RH: relative humidity).
Biosensors 08 00116 g010
Figure 11. The schematic view of the heterojunction formed at the surface of the cerium oxide (Ce) core-shell tungsten oxide (W) wires and the possible mechanism (a) after exposure to air and (b) reducing gases such as acetone. LD is the Debye length or depth of the depletion region from the surface (not at scale).
Figure 11. The schematic view of the heterojunction formed at the surface of the cerium oxide (Ce) core-shell tungsten oxide (W) wires and the possible mechanism (a) after exposure to air and (b) reducing gases such as acetone. LD is the Debye length or depth of the depletion region from the surface (not at scale).
Biosensors 08 00116 g011

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tomić, M.; Šetka, M.; Chmela, O.; Gràcia, I.; Figueras, E.; Cané, C.; Vallejos, S. Cerium Oxide-Tungsten Oxide Core-Shell Nanowire-Based Microsensors Sensitive to Acetone. Biosensors 2018, 8, 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios8040116

AMA Style

Tomić M, Šetka M, Chmela O, Gràcia I, Figueras E, Cané C, Vallejos S. Cerium Oxide-Tungsten Oxide Core-Shell Nanowire-Based Microsensors Sensitive to Acetone. Biosensors. 2018; 8(4):116. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios8040116

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tomić, Milena, Milena Šetka, Ondřej Chmela, Isabel Gràcia, Eduard Figueras, Carles Cané, and Stella Vallejos. 2018. "Cerium Oxide-Tungsten Oxide Core-Shell Nanowire-Based Microsensors Sensitive to Acetone" Biosensors 8, no. 4: 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios8040116

APA Style

Tomić, M., Šetka, M., Chmela, O., Gràcia, I., Figueras, E., Cané, C., & Vallejos, S. (2018). Cerium Oxide-Tungsten Oxide Core-Shell Nanowire-Based Microsensors Sensitive to Acetone. Biosensors, 8(4), 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios8040116

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop