Next Article in Journal
Necrotizing Gingivitis: Microbial Diversity and Quantification of Protein Secretion in Necrotizing Gingivitis
Next Article in Special Issue
Wild Animals Are Reservoirs and Sentinels of Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA Clones: A Problem with “One Health” Concern
Previous Article in Journal
Co-Occurrence of blaOXA-23 in the Chromosome and Plasmid: Increased Fitness in Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Effectiveness Study of Home-Based Interventions to Prevent CA-MRSA Infection Recurrence
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 10
Issue 10
10.3390/antibiotics10101198
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

FtsH Sensitizes Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus to β-Lactam Antibiotics by Degrading YpfP, a Lipoteichoic Acid Synthesis Enzyme

by
Won-Sik Yeo
1,2,
Bohyun Jeong
3,
Nimat Ullah
4,
Majid Ali Shah
1,
Amjad Ali
4,
Kyeong Kyu Kim
5 and
Taeok Bae
1,*
1
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Northwest Campus, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
2
Department of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA
3
Department of Microbiology, College of Medicine, Kosin University, Busan 49267, Korea
4
Atta-ur-Rahman School of Applied Biosciences (ASAB), National University of Sciences & Technology (NUST), Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
5
Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2021, 10(10), 1198; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10101198
Submission received: 21 August 2021 / Revised: 17 September 2021 / Accepted: 27 September 2021 / Published: 1 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue A Themed Issue in Honor of Professor Alexander Tomasz—Outstanding Contributions in the Fields of Antibiotic Resistance and Bacterial Infectious Diseases)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In the Gram-positive pathogen Staphylococcus aureus, FtsH, a membrane-bound metalloprotease, plays a critical role in bacterial virulence and stress resistance. This protease is also known to sensitize methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) to β-lactam antibiotics; however, the molecular mechanism is not known. Here, by the analysis of FtsH substrate mutants, we found that FtsH sensitizes MRSA specifically to β-lactams by degrading YpfP, the enzyme synthesizing the anchor molecule for lipoteichoic acid (LTA). Both the overexpression of FtsH and the disruption of ypfP-sensitized MRSA to β-lactams were observed. The knockout mutation in ftsH and ypfP increased the thickness of the cell wall. The β-lactam sensitization coincided with the production of aberrantly large LTA molecules. The combination of three mutations in the rpoC, vraB, and SAUSA300_2133 genes blocked the β-lactam-sensitizing effect of FtsH. Murine infection with the ypfP mutant could be treated by oxacillin, a β-lactam antibiotic ineffective against MRSA; however, the effective concentration of oxacillin differed depending on the S. aureus strain. Our study demonstrated that the β-lactam sensitizing effect of FtsH is due to its digestion of YpfP. It also suggests that the larger LTA molecules are responsible for the β-lactam sensitization phenotype, and YpfP is a viable target for developing novel anti-MRSA drugs.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive pathogenic bacterium causing multiple diseases ranging from soft-tissue infections to life-threatening diseases such as endocarditis, toxic shock syndrome, and necrotizing pneumonia [1,2]. The methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections cannot be effectively treated with most β-lactam antibiotics because it produces PBP2a, a transpeptidase whose active site is not accessible to most β-lactam antibiotics [3,4,5,6,7].
Although PBP2a has been ascribed to the main resistance determinant for β-lactam antibiotics in MRSA, the overall β-lactam resistance of MRSA requires additional molecular factors. For example, since PBP2a can carry out only a transpeptidation reaction, the transglycosylase activity of PBP2 is essential for cell-wall synthesis in MRSA [8]. PBP4 is also required for full resistance to β-lactams [9,10]. The reduced expression of cell-division proteins (e.g., FtsA, FtsW, and FtsZ) sensitizes MRSA to β-lactam antibiotics [11]. Wall teichoic acid (WTA) plays a critical role in the β-lactam resistance of MRSA because it acts as a scaffold to PBP2a by direct binding and is required for the localization of PBP4 [12,13]. Lipoteichoic acid (LTA) is also crucial for MRSA β-lactam resistance [14,15,16,17].
Various mutations are known to increase MRSA β-lactam resistance. By the genome sequencing of a highly resistant subpopulation of four historically early MRSA isolates (i.e., UK13136, ST63/458, E2125, and E4278), the Tomasz group identified 27 mutations [18]. Of the 27 genes, 21 were involved in the induction of stringent stress responses, a known factor to increase MRSA β-lactam resistance [19]; however, the roles of the remaining six genes are unknown. One of them is ftsH [18]. FtsH is a membrane-bound ATP-dependent Zn metalloprotease playing critical roles in resistance to various stresses, such as acidic pH, nutritional starvation, and toxic chemicals [20,21]. In S. aureus, FtsH directly degrades the following 12 proteins: LrgB, SAUSA300_0310, SAUSA300_0579, SaeQ, YpfP, CydA, CyoE, Ffh, SAUSA300_1351, HemA, HtrA, and MbtS [22,23]. Although the mechanism is unclear, FtsH also represses the transcription of four proteins indirectly: HslO, HrtA, HrtB, and SAUSA300_2637. LrgB is an antiholin-like protein and is involved in autolysis [24,25]. SaeQ is a regulatory protein of the sensor histidine kinase SaeS [26]. YpfP is the enzyme synthesizing the anchor molecule for LTA [27,28]. As cytochrome D ubiquinol oxidase subunit I, CydA is required for respiration [29]. HemA is involved in heme synthesis, whereas CyoE processes heme into the electron transport chain [30]. Ffh is a signal recognition particle protein and exports proteins to the cell membrane [31]. HtrA is a serine protease and plays a role in stress resistance [32]. HslO is predicted to be an Hsp33-like chaperonin, but its function is not defined in S. aureus. HrtA and HrtB form a heme-regulated transport system and are involved in heme metabolism [33]. Finally, MbtS is a membrane-bound transcription factor whose physiological function is not completely understood [22].
Independently of the previous study [18], we found that the deletion of ftsH increases the β-lactam resistance of S. aureus USA300, the predominant MRSA in the US [34]. Since the deletion of ftsH increases the MRSA β-lactam resistance, we hypothesized that FtsH overexpression would sensitize MRSA to β-lactams and found that it does. Therefore, in this study, we further sought to identify the underlying molecular mechanism.

2. Results

2.1. FtsH Sensitizes Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus to Oxacillin

In an agreement with the report by the Tomasz group [18], when we deleted the ftsH gene in S. aureus USA300, the oxacillin MIC of the strain increased eightfold from 8 µg/mL to 64 µg/mL. The MIC increase was abolished by the further deletion of mecA (the gene encoding PBP2a) (ΔftsH vs. ΔftsHΔmecA in Table 1), indicating that PBP2a is essential for the increased oxacillin resistance. Since the deletion of ftsH increased the oxacillin MIC, we suspected that the overexpression of FtsH would decrease the MIC. Indeed, when FtsH was overexpressed from pYJ-ftsH-His6, a multi-copy plasmid with anhydrotetracycline (ATc)-inducible promoter, the oxacillin MIC of USA300 decreased 16-fold from 8 µg/mL to 0.5 µg/mL (Table 1). Neither the plasmid vector nor the inducer ATc affected the oxacillin MIC (see WT(pYJ335) + ATc in Table 1). Moreover, when FtsH was overexpressed in the hospital-acquired MRSA strain COL and the community-acquired strain MW2 [35,36], their oxacillin MICs also decreased (Table 1). These results indicate that FtsH sensitizes MRSA to β-lactams, and the β-lactam-sensitizing effect of FtsH is likely conserved in S. aureus strains.

2.2. The Sensitization Effect of ftsH Is Specific to β-Lactams

To explore whether FtsH sensitizes MRSA to other antibiotics, we measured the MIC of various classes of antibiotics for the ftsH-deletion mutant of USA300. As shown, the ftsH-deletion significantly increased the MIC of β-lactams (i.e., oxacillin, cefotaxime, and cefazolin), which inhibit the transpeptidase activity of PBPs (Table 2). However, it did not significantly alter the MICs of other classes of antibiotics, inhibiting the transglycosylation /transpeptidation step (vancomycin, dalbavancin, and teicoplanin), protein synthesis (linezolid), or cell membrane integrity (daptomycin). Similarly, FtsH overexpression decreased only the MIC of β-lactams (+ ATc in Table 2). These results suggest that the sensitization effect of FtsH is specific to β-lactams.

2.3. FtsH Does Not Degrade PBP2a and PBP2

PBP2a and PBP2 are critical for MRSA β-lactam resistance [7,8,37,38]. Similar to FtsH, both PBPs are located in the membrane, raising the possibility that FtsH directly degrades those PBPs, resulting in lower β-lactam resistance. To test this possibility, we measured the expression levels of the PBP2a and PBP2 in WT, ΔftsH, and the FtsH overexpression strain ΔftsH (pYJ-ftsH-His6). PBP2a was detected by Western blotting, and PBP2 was visualized by the Bocillin-FL assay, where the fluorescent penicillin is used as a probe to detect PBPs [39]. The FtsH-overexpression strain was grown in the presence or absence of the inducer ATc. As expected, the ftsH-deletion increased the cellular levels of the two FtsH substrate proteins, SaeQ and YpfP (Figure 1a). However, similar to the non-substrate protein SrtA, no significant change was observed in the expression level of PBP2a or PBP2 (Figure 1a), indicating that FtsH does not degrade PBP2a and PBP2. When FtsH was overexpressed from pYJ-ftsH-His6, the expression level of the FtsH substrate protein SaeQ was decreased; however, no significant changes were observed in the cellular levels of PBP2a or PBP2. Based on these results, we concluded that the β-lactam-sensitizing effect of FtsH is not due to the direct degradation of PBP2a or PBP2 by FtsH.

2.4. The Deletion of the FtsH Substrate Gene ypfP Sensitizes the USA300 Strain to Oxacillin

FtsH may sensitize MRSA to β-lactams via those direct or indirect target proteins. To examine this possibility, except for Ffh and SAUSA300_1351, for which no mutant is available, we measured the oxacillin MIC for the rest of the 14 target-gene mutants. As compared with WT (MIC = 8 µg/mL), the lrgB and ypfP mutants showed decreased oxacillin MIC (lrgB, 4 µg/mL; ypfP, 0.5 µg/mL) (Table S1), indicating that the reduction of LrgB and YpfP might be responsible, at least in part, for the β-lactam-sensitizing effect of FtsH overexpression. Due to its greater effect on the oxacillin MIC, the ypfP gene was further studied.

2.5. The Production of Aberrantly Large LTA Molecules Coincides with Increased Sensitivity to Oxacillin

YpfP is an enzyme catalyzing the last step of the synthesis of diglucosyl diacylglycerol (Glc2-DAG), a glycolipid serving as the membrane anchor for LTA [27,28,40]. Since YpfP is the only enzyme synthesizing Glc2-DAG, the disruption of ypfP abolishes the production of the glycolipid. When that happens, diacylglycerol (DAG), not Glc2-DAG, serves as the anchor molecule, resulting in the synthesis of altered LTA [28,41]. Indeed, in the S. aureus USA300 strain, the ypfP mutation increased the size of LTA (ΔypfP in Figure 2). In other MRSA strains COL and MW2, the ypfP mutation also caused the accumulation of the large LTA (Figure S1). The overexpression of FtsH increased the production of LTA with a slight increase in size, too (ΔftsH (pYJ-ftsH-His6) in Figure 2). More importantly, as with the FtsH-overexpression (pYJ-ftsH-His6 +ATc in Table 2), the ypfP mutation reduced the MIC of β-lactams (ΔypfP in Table 3), which was also reported recently [17]. In the MRSA strains COL and MW2, the ypfP mutation also lowered the MIC of three β-lactam antibiotics (i.e., oxacillin, cefotaxime, and cefazolin) by 16 to 2048 times (MIC, 0.125~2 µg/mL depending on antibiotics) (Table S2). The disruption of the ypfP gene in the ΔftsH strain lowered the oxacillin MIC from 64 µg/mL to 0.5 µg/mL, the same as the MIC of the ypfP mutant (Table S3), and increased the production of large LTA (ΔftsH::ypfP in Figure 2). These results suggest that FtsH lowers the β-lactam resistance of MRSA via the degradation of YpfP and that the production of the large LTA might contribute to the reduced β-lactam resistance.

2.6. The ftsH and ypfP Mutations Do Not Affect Autolysis Activity But Increase the Cell Wall Thickness

To examine whether the alteration in β-lactam resistance is associated with changes in autolytic activity, we measured the autolytic activity of the WT, ftsH, and ypfP mutants; however, no significant difference was observed (Figure S2).
Next, since β-lactam antibiotics inhibit bacterial cell wall synthesis, we examined whether the ftsH and ypfP mutations affect the cell wall thickness of S. aureus. The WT, ftsH, and ypfP mutant strains were grown to exponential growth phase, fixed with glutaraldehyde, and subjected to electron microscopy to measure the cell wall thickness. Because the cell wall thickness was not even, it was measured at four different locations of a cell. About 30 cells of each strain were used for this measurement. As compared with WT, both mutants showed significantly increased cell wall thickness (WT, 26.89 ± 3.95 nm; ftsH, 38.6 ± 7.86 nm; ypfP, 36.5 ± 6.14 nm, Figure 3).

2.7. Identification of Suppressor Mutations

To further understand the molecular mechanism behind the β-lactam sensitization effects of FtsH, we decided to isolate suppressor mutants of USA300 (pYJ-ftsH-His6) whose oxacillin MIC is not decreased by FtsH overexpression. The USA300 (pYJ-ftsH-His6) cells were spread on the TSA plate containing 8, 16, and 32 µg/mL oxacillin with ATc (100 ng/mL) and incubated until colonies arose. Colonies grew only on TSA with 8 or 16 µg/mL oxacillin, and the mutant frequency was ~1.4 × 10−6 on TSA with 16 µg/mL oxacillin. We sequenced the genomes of 18 suppressor mutants (12 from oxacillin 8 µg/mL and 6 from 16 µg/mL), and the results are shown in Table 4. Intriguingly, every suppressor mutant contained the same mutations in three genes: rpoC, vraB, and SAUSA300_2133 (hereafter, 2133). The rpoC gene encodes an RNA polymerase β’ subunit, whereas the vraB gene encodes an acetyl-CoA c-acetyltransferase. The role of the 2133 gene is not known. We named the three mutations ‘core mutations’ (boldfaced in Table 4). Only the core mutations were found in two suppressor mutants, #8-9 and #8-13, indicating that the core mutations are sufficient to overcome the β-lactam sensitizing effect of FtsH. Intriguingly, in the suppressor mutant, the FtsH-overexpression increased LTA production without an apparent size increase (#8-9 in Figure 2 and Figure S3). To assess the effect of the ypfP mutation on the oxacillin resistance of the suppressor mutant, we eliminated pYJ-ftsH-His6 plasmid from #8-9, resulting in #8-9C, and transduced the transposon insertion mutation of ypfP into #8-9C. As shown, the disruption of ypfP increased the production of large LTA (#8-9C::ypfP in Figure 2) with a concomitant decrease of oxacillin MIC from 32 µg/mL to 0.125 µg/mL (Table S3). These results suggest that the core mutations are not sufficient to block the β-lactam sensitization effect of the ypfP-disruption.

2.8. The Suppressor Mutations in vraB and SAUSA300_2133 Confer S. aureus Insensitivity to FtsH

Next, we examined whether all three core mutations are required to confer MRSA insensitivity to FtsH overexpression. Despite repeated trials, we failed to generate the single rpoC S723T mutant, suggesting that the mutation alone might be lethal, and mutations in vraB and/or 2133 may compensate for such lethality. On the other hand, we successfully created the vraB and 2133 single mutations and vraB/2133 double mutation in the chromosome of USA300 by allele-replacement [42]. In the oxacillin MIC test, none of the mutations fully restored β-lactam resistance to the level of #8-9 (i.e., 32 µg/mL) (Figure 4a). However, the oxacillin MIC of both mutants was not further reduced by FtsH overexpression (+ in Figure 4a). In addition, unlike WT, the mutants did not show significantly increased LTA production upon FtsH overexpression (Figure 4b). The 2133 mutant produced a higher level of LTA, as compared with WT; however, it was reduced to the WT level by the vraB mutation (vraB/2133 in Figure 4b).

2.9. The Infection by the ypfP Mutant Could Be Treated with Oxacillin

So far, the results are consistent with the notion that FtsH sensitizes MRSA to β-lactam antibiotics by degrading YpfP. This raises the possibility that YpfP can be a target for the development of β-lactam potentiators that convert MRSA to methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA). To test this possibility, we examined whether the murine infection by the ypfP mutant can be treated with oxacillin. Although LTA is essential for growth in most S. aureus, including USA300, it is not in the MW2 strain [43]. Therefore, in this experiment, we used both the USA300 and the MW2 strains. When the same number of bacterial cells were injected into mice via the retro-orbital route, the ypfP-mutant of USA300 showed reduced virulence, compared with WT, whereas such a reduction in virulence was not observed with the ypfP-mutant of MW2 (Figure 5a), indicating that the virulence contribution of ypfP is strain-dependent. Next, mice were infected with either WT or the ypfP mutant via the retro-orbital route and treated with various amounts of oxacillin once per day for three days. Due to the lower virulence of the ypfP mutant of USA300, twice more cells were administered to the mice. As expected, regardless of the strain background, the infection by WT strain did not respond to the oxacillin treatment (WT in Figure 5b). However, the ypfP mutant infection responded to the oxacillin treatment, although a significantly higher amount was required for the ypfP mutant of MW2 (Figure 5b).

3. Discussion

As a membrane-bound ATP-dependent protease, FtsH degrades at least 12 membrane and cytoplasmic proteins in S. aureus and plays multiple roles in stress resistance, virulence, and β-lactam resistance [18,21,22,23]. In this study, we investigated the molecular mechanism behind the β-lactams sensitization effect of FtsH and found that FtsH sensitizes MRSA to β-lactam antibiotics through the degradation of YpfP, the enzyme synthesizing the membrane anchor molecule for LTA. The higher MIC of the ftsH mutant can be explained by the stabilization of YpfP.
The mechanism by which the degradation of YpfP lowers MRSA β-lactam resistance is unclear. The large LTA molecules without the Glc2-DAG anchor are likely the effector molecule bringing about the β-lactam sensitivity to MRSA. For example, under those β-lactam sensitization conditions, MRSA strains produced abnormally large LTA molecules (Figure 2 and Figure S1). In contrast, the suppressor mutant did not show increased production of the large LTA molecules upon FtsH-overexpression (Figure 2). At this moment, it is not clear which of the large size or the absence of the glycolipid anchor molecule contributes more to the β-lactam sensitization effect. Since the effect of FtsH overexpression and the ypfP-mutation was specific to β-lactam antibiotics (Table 2), it is possible that the large LTA molecules specifically inhibit the transpeptidase activity of PBPs, in particular, PBP2, PBP2a, and PBP4 that are essential for β-lactam resistance in MRSA [8,9,10]. However, because the LTA synthesis is closely linked to the membrane lipid metabolism [44], the increased synthesis of LTA in the FtsH-overexpression condition is expected to alter the membrane lipid composition, which might indirectly affect the activities of the cell wall synthesis enzymes. These ideas are currently being tested in our laboratory.
The suppressor mutant study showed that the β-lactam-sensitizing effect of FtsH could be blocked by the combination of three core mutations: RpoC S723T, VraB A144S, and SAUSA300_2133 V220L. RpoC is the β’ subunit of the RNA polymerase; therefore, the mutation in RpoC is expected to give a pleiotropic effect on staphylococcal gene transcription and expression. Although the mechanism is not clear, mutations in RNA polymerase subunits are associated with the increase in β-lactam resistance of S. aureus [45]. Since we failed to reproduce the mutation in the USA300 genome, we postulate that the mutation alone is lethal to the strain. VraB is an acetyl-CoA c-acetyltransferase, catalyzing the interconversion of acetyl-CoA and acetoacetyl-CoA, and has the potential to affect the synthesis of fatty acid and LTA. In our study, although the vraB mutation alone did not greatly affect LTA synthesis, it reduced LTA synthesis in the 2133 mutation (Figure 4b). Unlike RpoC and VraB, the function of 2133 is unknown. According to TMHMM analysis [46], the 2133 protein is a membrane protein with nine transmembrane helices. The Phyre 2 analysis [47] also suggests that the 2133 protein has a significant structural homology (99.4% confidence, 57% coverage) to the concentrative nucleoside transporter from Vibrio cholerae [48]. Intriguingly, the vraB mutation reduced oxacillin MIC two-fold, whereas the 2133 mutation increased it two-fold, implying that the genes have the opposite effect on β-lactam resistance. However, when the mutations were combined, both MIC and LTA synthesis were similar to those of the vraB mutant, demonstrating the dominant role of vraB over 2133. Nonetheless, both the vraB and the 2133 mutations limited the increase of LTA synthesis upon FtsH overexpression, which might contribute to the mutants’ insensitivity to the β-lactam sensitization effect of FtsH overexpression. Notably, the MIC of the double mutant (4 µg/mL) is 8 times lower than that of the 8-9 strain (MIC = 32 µg/mL); therefore, it is safe to conclude that the RpoC mutation is the major contributing factor of the increased MIC of the suppressor mutant 8-9.
Previously, Kiriukhin et al. and Ryuno et al. reported that the ypfP-knockout mutation increased the LD50 of S. aureus RN4220 approximately threefold in murine and silkworm infection models, respectively [28,49]. However, in our animal experiment, the ypfP mutation decreased the bacterial virulence in USA300 but not in MW2 (Figure 5a), demonstrating that the virulence contribution is strain dependent.
Recently, Hesser et al. reported that the ypfP knock-out mutation renders MRSA sensitive to various stressors, including cell wall hydrolases and β-lactam antibiotics [17]. The study also clearly demonstrated that the large LTA molecules, not the absence of YpfP protein, are responsible for the increased sensitivity. In this study, we also showed that, although the extent of sensitivity varied depending on the strains, the infection by ypfP mutants can be treated with oxacillin. Therefore, YpfP seems to be a viable target to develop anti-MRSA β-lactam potentiators. If combined with conventional β-lactams such as oxacillin, such drugs are expected to allow the β-lactams to kill MRSA and facilitate the immune-mediated elimination of the bacteria by lowering the bacterial virulence in certain strains.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial Strains, Plasmids, and Culture Conditions

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table S4 [22,23,35,36,42,50,51,52]. Nebraska library strains, whose names start with NE, were acquired from BEI Resources [53]. The ΦΝΞ-8752 is a transposon mutant of hrtB in Newman strain [54] and was acquired from Dominique Missiakas’ laboratory at the University of Chicago. E. coli and S. aureus were grown in lysogeny broth and tryptic soy broth (TSB), respectively. For transduction of mutations and plasmids, heart infusion broth (HIB) with 5 mM CaCl2 was used. For MIC measurement, cells were grown in Mueller–Hinton Broth with 2% NaCl. When necessary, antibiotics were added to the growth media at the following concentrations: ampicillin, 100 µg/mL; erythromycin, 10 µg/mL; and chloramphenicol, 5 µg/mL.

4.2. Plasmid Constructions and Mutagenesis

For reproducing the mutations in vraB and SAUSA300_2133, a 2 kb DNA fragment was PCR-amplified with the primer sets P4203/P4204 (for vraB) or with P4205/P4206 (for SAUSA300_2133) (Table S5). Primers were designed such that the mutation site is located in the middle of the DNA fragment. The DNA fragments were purified and assembled with EcoRV-digested pKOR1 by the Gibson method [42,55]. The assembled DNA was inserted into E. coli. After confirming the correct insertion of the DNA fragments in pKOR1, the plasmids were electroporated into S. aureus RN4220 and subsequently transduced into USA300-P23. The transduced strains were grown in TSB containing chloramphenicol (10 µg/mL, TSBcm10) at 30 °C overnight, and the resulting cultures (1–2 µL) were inoculated into 2 mL TSBcm5. After overnight growth at 42 °C, the cultures were diluted 105 folds in TSBcm5, and the diluted cultures (100 µL each) were spread on TSAcm5 and incubated at 42 °C overnight. Five colonies on the plates were grown in TSBcm5, and chromosomal DNAs were purified. The co-integration of the plasmid was confirmed by PCR-amplification of the purified DNA with the primer sets P4246/P4248 (for pKOR1-vraB) and P4246/P4249 (for pKOR1-2133). The cointegrate strains were grown in TSB at 30 °C overnight. Then the overnight cultures were diluted 100 times in TSB and incubated at 30 °C for 10 h. Finally, the resulting culture was diluted 100 times in TSB and incubate at 30 °C overnight. The cells were diluted 105 times in sterile water, and 100 µL was spread on TSA containing 0.2 µg/mL anhydrotetracycline and incubated at 30 °C overnight. Fifty colonies on the plate were examined for growth in the presence of chloramphenicol (10 µg/mL), and eight colonies, which failed to grow in the presence of chloramphenicol, were selected and grown in TSB at 30 °C. From the chromosomal DNA of the vraB and SAUSA300_2133 strains were PCR amplified with the primer sets P4043/P4044 and P4045/P4046, respectively (Table S5).

4.3. Determination of MIC

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for various antibiotics was determined with a serial dilution of antibiotics according to the recommendations proposed by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) using the microdilution method [56]. Cells were grown in Mueller–Hinton Broth with 2% NaCl. For daptomycin, CaCl2 (50 µg/mL final concentration) was added to the media. The MICs of the strains harboring pYJ335 or pYJ-ftsH-His6 were assessed in the absence or presence of anhydrotetracycline (100 ng/mL).

4.4. Isolation of Suppressor Mutants in the Strain USA Overexpressing FtsH

Overnight culture of USA300ΔftsH carrying pYJ-ftsH-His6 was diluted and spread onto TSA containing erythromycin (10 µg/mL), oxacillin (8, 16, and 32 µg/mL), and anhydrotetracycline (100 ng/mL). The plates were incubated at 37 °C until colonies appeared. The colonies were streaked on the same TSA plate to confirm their oxacillin resistance. Then, the FtsH expression was confirmed by Western blotting with an anti-His6 antibody. Finally, the suppressor mutants were grown in TSBerm10, and genomic DNA was purified with UltraClean Microbial Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and sent to the Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics at Indiana University, where the mutant genomes were sequenced with Illumina NextSeq 500.

4.5. Western Blot Analysis

Western blot analysis of proteins was carried out as described previously [57]. The SaeS, SrtA, PBP2, and FtsH antibodies were generated by our laboratory. The anti-His6 and the anti-PBP2a antibody were purchased from Invitrogen and Abnova, respectively.
Western blot analysis of LTA was carried out as previously described [17], with modifications. Briefly, overnight cultures of the test strains were diluted 1:100 into 10 mL TSB and incubated for 6 h at 37 °C with shaking. When the test strain contains pYJ-ftsH-His6, the overnight culture was diluted 1:100 into TSBerm10 without or with anhydrotetracycline (100 ng/mL). Cultures were normalized for their optical density (OD600 of 4). Cells in the normalized cultures (0.8 mL) were pelleted by centrifugation, suspended in 50 μL of a lysostaphin solution (50 μg/mL lysostaphin, 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2), and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. DNaseⅠ (1 µL, NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA) was added to the cell lysates, and the samples were incubated at 37 °C for 15 min. Then 0.5 μL of proteinase K (20 mg/mL, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) was added, and the samples were further incubated at 50 °C for 2 h and mixed with 50 μL of 2 × SDS- PAGE sample buffer. Each sample (10 µL) was subjected to 15% SDS-PAGE. Western blotting was performed with anti-LTA monoclonal antibody (Clone 55, HyCult Biotechnology, Wayne, NJ, USA) at a 1:1000 or 1:2000 dilution as primary antibody and the horseradish peroxidase-linked anti-mouse antibody (Cell signaling, Danvers, MA, USA) at a 1:5000 dilution as the secondary antibody.
The Western blots were visualized by the Supersignal West Pico PLUS Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and the images were taken and processed with LAS-4000 (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). All Western blots were repeated at least three times with similar results.

4.6. Labeling of Penicillin-binding Proteins (PBPs) Using Bocillin-FL

Membrane vesicles were prepared as described before [57]. Briefly, overnight cultures of USA300 and USA300ΔftsH were transferred into fresh TSB and incubated for 6 h at 37 °C with shaking. The strain USA300ΔftsH harboring pYJ-ftsH -His6 was cultured in TSBerm10 without or with anhydrotetracycline (100 ng/mL). Cells were collected by centrifugation, suspended in TSM buffer (20 mM Tris HCl, 0.5 M sucrose, 10 mM MgCl2, pH 8.0) containing lysostaphin (50 μg/mL), and incubated at 37 °C for 5 min. After brief sonication of the cell lysates, cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 7000 rpm, 4 °C for 10 min. The membrane fraction was collected by ultracentrifugation (45,000× g for 45 min, Beckman Optima Max-XP Ultracentrifuge, Brea, CA, USA). The membranes were washed twice in TKM buffer (50 mM Tris HCl, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2) and collected by ultracentrifugation (45,000× g, 4 °C, 30 min). Finally, the membranes were suspended in TKMG buffer (50 mM Tris HCl, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 25% glycerol, pH 8.0) and stored at −80 °C until use. The membrane vesicles (100 µg) were labeled with 100 µM Bocillin-FL (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) for 10 min at 30 °C. The reaction was stopped by adding 5 × SDS-PAGE sample buffer. Labeled membrane proteins were separated on a 7.5% SDS-PAGE gel and detected with a LAS-4000 (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) followed by quantification with Multi Gauge software (Fuji Film, V3).

4.7. Autolysis Assay

The autolysis assay was carried out as described by Bose et al. [58] without modifications.

4.8. Electron Microscopy

The test strains were grown in 3 mL TSB at 37 °C with shaking (200 rpm) to exponential growth phase (OD600 = 1). Cells were collected by centrifugation and suspended in 3% glutaraldehyde (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), 0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.2. After overnight fixation at 4 °C, the samples were sent to the Electron Microscopy Core Facility at Indiana University. At the facility, the specimens were post-fixed in 1% Osmium tetroxide, dehydrated, infiltrated, and embedded in Embed 812 (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA). Thin sections were cut (80–90 nm), heavy metal stained, then viewed on a Tecnai Spirit (ThermoFisher, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Digital images, including all measurements, were taken with an AMT (Advanced Microscope Techniques, Danvers, MA) CCD camera.

4.9. Animal Experiment

The murine blood infection experiment was carried out as described previously with minor modifications [59]. In the experiment, sex-matched C57BL/6J mice (n = 10, 8-week-old, Jackson Laboratory) were used. For the virulence test, mice were infected via retro-orbital injection with 108 CFU (USA300 strain) or ~7.5 × 107 CFU (MW2 strain) of either WT or ypfP and observed for nine days. For the oxacillin-treatment test for USA300 strain, 108 CFU (USA300 WT) or 2 × 108 CFU (USA300::ypfP, MW2 WT, and MW2::ypfP) of bacteria were administered into mice via retro-orbital injection. Then, 50 µL of various concentrations of oxacillin (1-28 mg/mL) were administered intramuscularly 1 h after the bacterial infection and daily for two more days. The infected mice were observed for two weeks.

5. Conclusions

In S. aureus, the ATP-dependent protease FtsH sensitizes the bacterium to β-lactam antibiotics by degrading YpfP, an enzyme synthesizing the glycolipid anchor molecule for LTA synthesis. Since the lack of YpfP increases the size of LTA molecules as well as the thickness of the cell wall, we hypothesize that the large LTA molecules affect the cell-wall synthesis process directly. Finally, the in vivo efficacy of oxacillin on the ypfP mutants in the murine infection model demonstrates that YpfP is a viable target for the development of β-lactam potentiator against MRSA.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics10101198/s1, Figure S1: The effect of the ypfP-deletion on the LTA expression in three different S. aureus strains, Figure S2: the effect of the ftsH and the ypfP mutation on the autolysis activity of S. aureus USA300, Figure S3: FtsH expression in the wild-type and the suppressor mutant #8-9, Figure S4: FtsH expressions in the wild-type, vraB, 2133, and the vraB/2133 double mutant containing pYJ-ftsH-His6. Table S1: Oxacillin MICs of FtsH-target gene mutants of USA300, Table S2: β-lactam resistance of ypfP mutants in three MRSA strain backgrounds, Table S3. The effect of the ypfP-deletion and the core suppressor mutations on the oxacillin MIC of the USA300, Table S4: Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study, Table S5: Oligonucleotides used in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.-S.Y. and T.B.; methodology, W.-S.Y., B.J., N.U. and T.B.; formal analysis, W.-S.Y., B.J., N.U., M.A.S. and T.B.; investigation, W.-S.Y., B.J., N.U. and T.B.; resources, A.A., K.K.K. and T.B.; data curation, T.B.; writing—original draft preparation, W.-S.Y. and T.B.; writing—review and editing, T.B.; visualization, W.-S.Y. and T.B.; supervision, A.A. and T.B.; project administration, K.K.K. and T.B.; funding acquisition, T.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant to K.K.K (2017M3A9E4078553) and by NIH (AI143792) and the Research Enhancement Grant from Indiana University and the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CTSI) to TB. CTSI is funded, in part by Grant Number UL1TR002529 from the National Institute of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Clinical and Translational Sciences Award.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of NIH. The animal protocol was approved by the IUSM-NW IACUC (#NW-48, approval date: 12/17/2020). Every effort was made to minimize the suffering of the animals.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in supplementary material.

Acknowledgments

We thank Caroline Miller at the iCEM, Center for Electron Microscopy, for her help with electron microscopy analysis of S. aureus mutants.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Lowy, F.D. Staphylococcus aureus infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 339, 520–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gordon, R.J.; Lowy, F.D. Pathogenesis of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 46, S350–S359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fuda, C.; Suvorov, M.; Vakulenko, S.B.; Mobashery, S. The basis for resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics by penicillin-binding protein 2a of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 40802–40806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Utsui, Y.; Yokota, T. Role of an altered penicillin-binding protein in methicillin- and cephem-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1985, 28, 397–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mahasenan, K.V.; Molina, R.; Bouley, R.; Batuecas, M.T.; Fisher, J.F.; Hermoso, J.A.; Chang, M.; Mobashery, S. Conformational Dynamics in Penicillin-Binding Protein 2a of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Allosteric Communication Network and Enablement of Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 2102–2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Otero, L.; Rojas-Altuve, A.; Llarrull, L.; Carrasco-Lopez, C.; Kumarasiri, M.; Lastochkin, E.; Fishovitz, J.; Dawley, M.; Hesek, D.; Lee, M.; et al. How allosteric control of Staphylococcus aureus penicillin binding protein 2a enables methicillin resistance and physiological function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 16808–16813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fisher, J.F.; Mobashery, S. Beta-Lactams against the Fortress of the Gram-Positive Staphylococcus aureus Bacterium. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 3412–3463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pinho, M.; de Lencastre, H.; Tomasz, A. An acquired and a native penicillin-binding protein cooperate in building the cell wall of drug-resistant staphylococci. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 10886–10891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hamilton, S.M.; Alexander, J.A.N.; Choo, E.J.; Basuino, L.; da Costa, T.M.; Severin, A.; Chung, M.; Aedo, S.; Strynadka, N.C.J.; Tomasz, A.; et al. High-Level Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to beta-Lactam Antibiotics Mediated by Penicillin-Binding Protein 4 (PBP4). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e02727-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Basuino, L.; Jousselin, A.; Alexander, J.A.N.; Strynadka, N.C.; Pinho, M.G.; Chambers, H.F.; Chatterjee, S.S. PBP4 activity and its overexpression are necessary for PBP4-mediated high-level beta-lactam resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 1177–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lee, S.H.; Jarantow, L.W.; Wang, H.; Sillaots, S.; Cheng, H.; Meredith, T.C.; Roemer, T. Antagonism of chemical genetic interaction networks resensitize MRSA to beta-lactam antibiotics. Chem. Biol. 2011, 18, 1379–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Qamar, A.; Golemi-Kotra, D. Dual Roles of FmtA in Staphylococcus aureus Cell Wall Biosynthesis and Autolysis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 3797–3805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Brown, S.; Xia, G.; Luhachack, L.G.; Campbell, J.; Meredith, T.C.; Chen, C.; Winstel, V.; Gekeler, C.; Irazoqui, J.; Peschel, A.; et al. Methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus requires glycosylated wall teichoic acids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 18909–18914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Meredith, T.C.; Wang, H.; Beaulieu, P.; Gründling, A.; Roemer, T. Harnessing the power of transposon mutagenesis for antibacterial target identification and evaluation. Mob. Genet. Elem. 2012, 2, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Karinou, E.; Schuster, C.F.; Pazos, M.; Vollmer, W.; Gründling, A. Inactivation of the Monofunctional Peptidoglycan Glycosyltransferase SgtB Allows Staphylococcus aureus To Survive in the Absence of Lipoteichoic Acid. J. Bacteriol. 2019, 201, e00574-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hesser, A.R.; Schaefer, K.; Lee, W.; Walker, S. Lipoteichoic acid polymer length is determined by competition between free starter units. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 29669–29676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hesser, A.R.; Matano, L.M.; Vickery, C.R.; Wood, B.M.; Santiago, A.G.; Morris, H.G.; Do, T.; Losick, R.; Walker, S. The Length of Lipoteichoic Acid Polymers Controls Staphylococcus aureus Cell Size and Envelope Integrity. J. Bacteriol. 2020, 202, e00149-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dordel, J.; Kim, C.; Chung, M.; Pardos de la Gándara, M.; Holden, M.T.; Parkhill, J.; Tomasz, A. Novel determinants of antibiotic resistance: Identification of mutated loci in highly methicillin-resistant subpopulations of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. MBio 2014, 5, e01000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kim, C.K.; Milheiriço, C.; de Lencastre, H.; Tomasz, A. Antibiotic Resistance as a Stress Response: Recovery of High-Level Oxacillin Resistance in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus “Auxiliary” (fem) Mutants by Induction of the Stringent Stress Response. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e00313-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ito, K.; Akiyama, Y. Cellular functions, mechanism of action, and regulation of FtsH protease. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 59, 211–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lithgow, J.K.; Ingham, E.; Foster, S.J. Role of the hprT-ftsH locus in Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiology 2004, 150, 373–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yeo, W.S.; Anokwute, C.; Marcadis, P.; Levitan, M.; Ahmed, M.; Bae, Y.; Kim, K.; Kostrominova, T.; Liu, Q.; Bae, T. A Membrane-Bound Transcription Factor is Proteolytically Regulated by the AAA+ Protease FtsH in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 2020, 202, e00019-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, Q.; Hu, M.; Yeo, W.-S.; He, L.; Li, T.; Zhu, Y.; Meng, H.; Wang, Y.; Lee, H.; Liu, X.; et al. Rewiring of the FtsH regulatory network by a single nucleotide change in saeS of Staphylococcus aureus. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Beltrame, C.O.; Cortes, M.F.; Bonelli, R.R.; Côrrea, A.B.D.A.; Botelho, A.M.N.; Americo, M.A.; Figueiredo, A.M.S. Inactivation of the Autolysis-Related Genes lrgB and yycI in Staphylococcus aureus Increases Cell Lysis-Dependent eDNA Release and Enhances Biofilm Development In Vitro and In Vivo. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0138924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Brunskill, E.W.; Bayles, K.W. Identification of LytSR-regulated genes from Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 1996, 178, 5810–5812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jeong, D.-W.; Cho, H.; Jones, M.B.; Shatzkes, K.; Sun, F.; Ji, Q.; Liu, Q.; Peterson, S.N.; He, C.; Bae, T. The auxiliary protein complex SaePQ activates the phosphatase activity of sensor kinase SaeS in the SaeRS two-component system of Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Microbiol. 2012, 86, 331–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fedtke, I.; Mader, D.; Kohler, T.; Moll, H.; Nicholson, G.; Biswas, R.; Henseler, K.; Götz, F.; Zähringer, U.; Peschel, A. A Staphylococcus aureus ypfP mutant with strongly reduced lipoteichoic acid (LTA) content: LTA governs bacterial surface properties and autolysin activity. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 65, 1078–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kiriukhin, M.Y.; Debabov, D.V.; Shinabarger, D.L.; Neuhaus, F.C. Biosynthesis of the Glycolipid Anchor in Lipoteichoic Acid of Staphylococcus aureus RN4220: Role of YpfP, the Diglucosyldiacylglycerol Synthase. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 3506–3514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Voggu, L.; Schlag, S.; Biswas, R.; Rosenstein, R.; Rausch, C.; Gotz, F. Microevolution of Cytochrome bd Oxidase in Staphylococci and Its Implication in Resistance to Respiratory Toxins Released by Pseudomonas. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 8079–8086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Stevens, E.; Laabei, M.; Gardner, S.; Somerville, G.A.; Massey, R.C. Cytolytic toxin production by Staphylococcus aureus is dependent upon the activity of the protoheme IX farnesyltransferase. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Phillips, G.J.; Silhavy, T. The E. coli ffh gene is necessary for viability and efficient protein export. Nature 1992, 359, 744–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wessler, S.; Schneider, G.; Backert, S. Bacterial serine protease HtrA as a promising new target for antimicrobial therapy? Cell Commun. Signal 2017, 15, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Friedman, D.B.; Stauff, D.L.; Pishchany, G.; Whitwell, C.W.; Torres, V.; Skaar, E.P. Staphylococcus aureus Redirects Central Metabolism to Increase Iron Availability. PLOS Pathog. 2006, 2, e87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Diep, B.A.; Gill, S.R.; Chang, R.F.; Phan, T.H.; Chen, J.H.; Davidson, M.G.; Lin, F.; Lin, J.; Charleston, H.A.; Mongodin, E.F.; et al. Complete genome sequence of USA300, an epidemic clone of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 2006, 367, 731–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gill, S.R.; Fouts, D.E.; Archer, G.L.; Mongodin, E.F.; DeBoy, R.T.; Ravel, J.; Paulsen, I.T.; Kolonay, J.F.; Brinkac, L.; Beanan, M.; et al. Insights on Evolution of Virulence and Resistance from the Complete Genome Analysis of an Early Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strain and a Biofilm-Producing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis Strain. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 2426–2438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Baba, T.; Takeuchi, F.; Kuroda, M.; Yuzawa, H.; Aoki, K.-I.; Oguchi, A.; Nagai, Y.; Iwama, N.; Asano, K.; Naimi, T.; et al. Genome and virulence determinants of high virulence community-acquired MRSA. Lancet 2002, 359, 1819–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pinho, M.; Filipe, S.R.; de Lencastre, H.; Tomasz, A. Complementation of the Essential Peptidoglycan Transpeptidase Function of Penicillin-Binding Protein 2 (PBP2) by the Drug Resistance Protein PBP2A in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 6525–6531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Peacock, S.; Paterson, G. Mechanisms of Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2015, 84, 577–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhao, G.; Meier, T.I.; Kahl, S.; Gee, K.R.; Blaszczak, L.C. BOCILLIN FL, a Sensitive and Commercially Available Reagent for Detection of Penicillin-Binding Proteins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1999, 43, 1124–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Jorasch, P.; Warnecke, D.C.; Lindner, B.; Zähringer, U.; Heinz, E. Novel processive and nonprocessive glycosyltransferases from Staphylococcus aureus and Arabidopsis thaliana synthesize glycoglycerolipids, glycophospholipids, glycosphingolipids and glycosylsterols. JBIC J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 267, 3770–3783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gründling, A.; Schneewind, O. Genes Required for Glycolipid Synthesis and Lipoteichoic Acid Anchoring in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 2521–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bae, T.; Schneewind, O. Allelic replacement in Staphylococcus aureus with inducible counter-selection. Plasmid 2006, 55, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Coe, K.A.; Lee, W.; Stone, M.C.; Komazin-Meredith, G.; Meredith, T.C.; Grad, Y.H.; Walker, S. Multi-strain Tn-Seq reveals common daptomycin resistance determinants in Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS Pathog. 2019, 15, e1007862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Koch, H.U.; Haas, R.; Fischer, W. The role of lipoteichoic acid biosynthesis in membrane lipid metabolism of growing Staph-ylococcus aureus. Eur. J. Biochem. 1984, 138, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Panchal, V.V.; Griffiths, C.; Mosaei, H.; Bilyk, B.; Sutton, J.A.; Carnell, O.T.; Hornby, D.P.; Green, J.; Hobbs, J.K.; Kelley, W.L.; et al. Evolving MRSA: High-level beta-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus is associated with RNA Polymerase alterations and fine tuning of gene expression. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1008672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Krogh, A.; Larsson, B.; von Heijne, G.; Sonnhammer, E. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden markov model: Application to complete genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 305, 567–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. A Kelley, L.; Mezulis, S.; Yates, C.M.; Wass, M.; Sternberg, E.M.J. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2015, 10, 845–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Johnson, Z.L.; Cheong, C.-G.; Lee, S.-Y. Crystal structure of a concentrative nucleoside transporter from Vibrio cholerae at 2.4 Å. Nature 2012, 483, 489–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ryuno, H.; Nigo, F.; Naguro, I.; Sekimizu, K.; Kaito, C. Staphylococcus aureus aggregation in the plasma fraction of silkworm hemolymph. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0217517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Kreiswirth, B.N.; Löfdahl, S.; Betley, M.J.; O’Reilly, M.; Schlievert, P.; Bergdoll, M.S.; Novick, R. The toxic shock syndrome exotoxin structural gene is not detectably transmitted by a prophage. Nature 1983, 305, 709–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Jeong, D.-W.; Cho, H.; Lee, H.; Li, C.; Garza, J.; Fried, M.; Bae, T. Identification of the P3 Promoter and Distinct Roles of the Two Promoters of the SaeRS Two-Component System in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 4672–4684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ji, Y.; Marra, A.; Rosenberg, M.; Woodnutt, G. Regulated antisense RNA eliminates alpha-toxin virulence in Staphylococcus aureus infection. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 6585–6590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Fey, P.D.; Endres, J.L.; Yajjala, V.K.; Widhelm, T.J.; Boissy, R.J.; Bose, J.L.; Bayles, K.W. A Genetic Resource for Rapid and Comprehensive Phenotype Screening of Nonessential Staphylococcus aureus Genes. MBio 2013, 4, e00537-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bae, T.; Banger, A.K.; Wallace, A.; Glass, E.M.; Aslund, F.; Schneewind, O.; Missiakas, D.M. Staphylococcus aureus virulence genes identified by bursa aurealis mutagenesis and nematode killing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 12312–12317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Gibson, D.G.; Young, L.; Chuang, R.Y.; Venter, J.C.; Hutchison, C.A.; Smith, H.O. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat. Methods 2009, 6, 343–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Suspceptability Testing; CLSI approved standard M100-S15; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  57. Liu, Q.; Cho, H.; Yeo, W.-S.; Bae, T. The Extracytoplasmic Linker Peptide of the Sensor Protein SaeS Tunes the Kinase Activity Required for Staphylococcal Virulence in Response to Host Signals. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1004799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Bose, J.L.; Lehman, M.K.; Fey, P.D.; Bayles, K.W. Contribution of the Staphylococcus aureus Atl AM and GL Murein Hydrolase Activities in Cell Division, Autolysis, and Biofilm Formation. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e42244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yeo, W.-S.; Arya, R.; Kim, K.K.; Jeong, H.; Cho, K.H.; Bae, T. The FDA-approved anti-cancer drugs, streptozotocin and floxuridine, reduce the virulence of Staphylococcus aureus. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antibiotics 10 01198 g001 550
Figure 1. FtsH does not degrade PBP2a and PBP2. (a) The effect of the ftsH-deletion on the cellular levels of FtsH target proteins and PBPs. Two substrate proteins, SaeQ and YpfP, and the non-substrate protein sortase A (SrtA) were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. YpfP was expressed from pYJ-ypfP-His6, whereas all other proteins were from the chromosome. SaeQ, PBP2a, SrtA, and PBP2 were detected with their corresponding antibodies, whereas YpfP was probed with an anti-His6 antibody. (b) The effect of FtsH-overexpression on the expression levels of PBPs. ΔftsH (pYJ-ftsH-His6) was grown with or without ATc. FtsH, PBP2a, and SaeQ were detected by Western blotting, whereas PBP2 was detected by Bocillin-FL assay. ATc, anhydrotetracycline. −, absence; +, presence.
Figure 1. FtsH does not degrade PBP2a and PBP2. (a) The effect of the ftsH-deletion on the cellular levels of FtsH target proteins and PBPs. Two substrate proteins, SaeQ and YpfP, and the non-substrate protein sortase A (SrtA) were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. YpfP was expressed from pYJ-ypfP-His6, whereas all other proteins were from the chromosome. SaeQ, PBP2a, SrtA, and PBP2 were detected with their corresponding antibodies, whereas YpfP was probed with an anti-His6 antibody. (b) The effect of FtsH-overexpression on the expression levels of PBPs. ΔftsH (pYJ-ftsH-His6) was grown with or without ATc. FtsH, PBP2a, and SaeQ were detected by Western blotting, whereas PBP2 was detected by Bocillin-FL assay. ATc, anhydrotetracycline. −, absence; +, presence.
Antibiotics 10 01198 g001
Antibiotics 10 01198 g002 550
Figure 2. The β-lactam-sensitizing conditions promote the production of large LTA molecules. LTA was extracted from the test strains and separated by 15% SDS-PAGE; then, it was detected by Western blotting with an anti-LTA antibody. WT, wild-type; ΔftsH, ftsH-deletion mutant; #8-9, a suppressor mutant of USA300 (pYJ-ftsH-His6) that is resistant to the β-lactam sensitizing effect of FtsH; #8-9C, #8-9 without pYJ-ftsH-His6; ΔypfP, USA300 with a transposon insertion in ypfP; −, no ATc; +, ATc (100 ng/mL).
Figure 2. The β-lactam-sensitizing conditions promote the production of large LTA molecules. LTA was extracted from the test strains and separated by 15% SDS-PAGE; then, it was detected by Western blotting with an anti-LTA antibody. WT, wild-type; ΔftsH, ftsH-deletion mutant; #8-9, a suppressor mutant of USA300 (pYJ-ftsH-His6) that is resistant to the β-lactam sensitizing effect of FtsH; #8-9C, #8-9 without pYJ-ftsH-His6; ΔypfP, USA300 with a transposon insertion in ypfP; −, no ATc; +, ATc (100 ng/mL).
Antibiotics 10 01198 g002
Antibiotics 10 01198 g003 550
Figure 3. The ftsH and the ypfP mutations increase the cell wall thickness in USA300. (a) The summary of cell wall thickness measurements. The statistical significance of the difference was measured by unpaired Student’s t-test. ****, p < 0.0001. (b) An example of cell wall thickness measurements. The white lines in the bacterial cell images are the measurement points. WT, wild-type; ΔftsH, ftsH-deletion mutant; ypfP, a transposon-insertion mutant of ypfP. Scale bar = 200 nm.
Figure 3. The ftsH and the ypfP mutations increase the cell wall thickness in USA300. (a) The summary of cell wall thickness measurements. The statistical significance of the difference was measured by unpaired Student’s t-test. ****, p < 0.0001. (b) An example of cell wall thickness measurements. The white lines in the bacterial cell images are the measurement points. WT, wild-type; ΔftsH, ftsH-deletion mutant; ypfP, a transposon-insertion mutant of ypfP. Scale bar = 200 nm.
Antibiotics 10 01198 g003
Antibiotics 10 01198 g004 550
Figure 4. The vraB and the 2133 mutations make S. aureus insensitive to the β-lactam sensitizing effect of FtsH overexpression. (a) The effect of the vraB and the 2133 mutations on oxacillin MIC. MIC was measured in Mueller–Hinton with 2% NaCl with (+) or without (−) FtsH overexpression by anhydrotetracycline (ATc, 100 ng/mL). (b) The effect of the vraB and the 2133 mutations on the LTA production with (+) or without (−) FtsH overexpression by Atc. Cells were grown in TSB, and LTA was detected by Western blotting with an anti-LTA antibody. pftsH, pYJ-ftsH-His6; WT, USA300 wild-type; vraB, USA300 with the vraB (A144S) mutation; 2133, USA300 with the SAUSA300_2133 (V220L) mutation. vraB/2133, USA300 with the double mutation of vraB and 2133.
Figure 4. The vraB and the 2133 mutations make S. aureus insensitive to the β-lactam sensitizing effect of FtsH overexpression. (a) The effect of the vraB and the 2133 mutations on oxacillin MIC. MIC was measured in Mueller–Hinton with 2% NaCl with (+) or without (−) FtsH overexpression by anhydrotetracycline (ATc, 100 ng/mL). (b) The effect of the vraB and the 2133 mutations on the LTA production with (+) or without (−) FtsH overexpression by Atc. Cells were grown in TSB, and LTA was detected by Western blotting with an anti-LTA antibody. pftsH, pYJ-ftsH-His6; WT, USA300 wild-type; vraB, USA300 with the vraB (A144S) mutation; 2133, USA300 with the SAUSA300_2133 (V220L) mutation. vraB/2133, USA300 with the double mutation of vraB and 2133.
Antibiotics 10 01198 g004
Antibiotics 10 01198 g005 550
Figure 5. YpfP is a viable target for the development of a β-lactam potentiator. (a) The effect of the ypfP mutation on staphylococcal virulence. An equal number of the wild-type (WT) or the ypfP-mutant cells was injected into 10 mice via the retro-orbital route; then, the infected mice were observed for 9 days. (b) The effect of the ypfP mutation on oxacillin-treatment. Mice were infected with WT or the ypfP mutant via the retro-orbital route; then, the mice were treated with oxacillin via i.m. injection once per day for three days. The mice were observed for two weeks. The numbers on the strain names are the amount of oxacillin used in mg. The statistical significance of murine survival was measured by the Log-rank test. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.005; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001.
Figure 5. YpfP is a viable target for the development of a β-lactam potentiator. (a) The effect of the ypfP mutation on staphylococcal virulence. An equal number of the wild-type (WT) or the ypfP-mutant cells was injected into 10 mice via the retro-orbital route; then, the infected mice were observed for 9 days. (b) The effect of the ypfP mutation on oxacillin-treatment. Mice were infected with WT or the ypfP mutant via the retro-orbital route; then, the mice were treated with oxacillin via i.m. injection once per day for three days. The mice were observed for two weeks. The numbers on the strain names are the amount of oxacillin used in mg. The statistical significance of murine survival was measured by the Log-rank test. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.005; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001.
Antibiotics 10 01198 g005
Table
Table 1. Effect of FtsH on the oxacillin resistance of three MRSA strains.
Table 1. Effect of FtsH on the oxacillin resistance of three MRSA strains.
StrainsMIC (µg/mL)
USA300WT *8
ΔftsH64
ΔmecA 0.25
ΔftsHΔmecA0.25
WT (pYJ335) + ATc **8
WT (pYJ-ftsH-His6)8
WT (pYJ-ftsH-His6) + ATc0.5
COLWT256
WT (pYJ335) + ATc256
WT (pYJ-ftsH-His6)128
WT (pYJ-ftsH-His6) + ATc8
MW2WT8
WT (pYJ335) + ATc8
WT (pYJ-ftsH-His6)4
WT (pYJ-ftsH-His6) + ATc2
* WT, wild-type. ** ATc, anhydrotetracycline (100 ng/mL).
Table
Table 2. Effect of FtsH overexpression on the USA300 resistance to various antibiotics.
Table 2. Effect of FtsH overexpression on the USA300 resistance to various antibiotics.
MIC (µg/mL)
AntibioticsWTΔftsHΔftsH(pYJ-ftsH-His6)
−ATc+ATc
Oxacillin864160.5
Cefotaxime32128168
Cefazolin32128324
Vancomycin2112
Dalbavancin0.20.40.40.2
Teicoplanin10.50.51
Linezolid4222
Daptomycin **0.50.250.50.5
ATc, anhydrotetracycline (100 ng/mL); −, no addition; +, addition. ** Calcium chloride (50 µg/mL) was added to the growth medium.
Table
Table 3. Effect of the ypfP mutation on the USA300 resistance to various antibiotics.
Table 3. Effect of the ypfP mutation on the USA300 resistance to various antibiotics.
AntibioticsWTypfP
Oxacillin80.5
Cefotaxime322
Cefazolin320.5
Vancomycin22
Delbavancin0.20.4
Teicoplanin12
Linezolid41
Daptomycin *0.50.5
* Calcium chloride (50 µg/mL) was added to the growth medium.
Table
Table 4. Suppressor mutations identified in USA300 (pYJ-ftsH-His6).
Table 4. Suppressor mutations identified in USA300 (pYJ-ftsH-His6).
No.GeneFunctionChanges
in DNA		Changes
in Protein		Number of
Mutants
(Total 18)
1rpoCRNA polymerase β’ subunitT591408AS723T18
2vraBAcetyl-CoA c-acetyltransferaseG635085TA144S18
32133Hypothetical proteinC2306775AV220L18
40606Hypothetical proteinInsertion
A680372 (2 nt)
T680375 (4 nt)
T680375 (7 nt)
T680376 (10 nt)		Frame-shift
3
2
2
2
5clpPATP-dependent Clp protease, proteolytic subunitG838600A
C838711A
A838825T
C839105A
A839135G
T839161C		E9K
A53E
I84F
A177E
D187G
Stop196Q		1
1
5
1
2
1
6clpXATP-dependent Clp protease, ATP-binding subunitA1775135C
C1775137T		F267V
G266D		1
4
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yeo, W.-S.; Jeong, B.; Ullah, N.; Shah, M.A.; Ali, A.; Kim, K.K.; Bae, T. FtsH Sensitizes Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus to β-Lactam Antibiotics by Degrading YpfP, a Lipoteichoic Acid Synthesis Enzyme. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1198. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10101198

AMA Style

Yeo W-S, Jeong B, Ullah N, Shah MA, Ali A, Kim KK, Bae T. FtsH Sensitizes Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus to β-Lactam Antibiotics by Degrading YpfP, a Lipoteichoic Acid Synthesis Enzyme. Antibiotics. 2021; 10(10):1198. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10101198

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yeo, Won-Sik, Bohyun Jeong, Nimat Ullah, Majid Ali Shah, Amjad Ali, Kyeong Kyu Kim, and Taeok Bae. 2021. "FtsH Sensitizes Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus to β-Lactam Antibiotics by Degrading YpfP, a Lipoteichoic Acid Synthesis Enzyme" Antibiotics 10, no. 10: 1198. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10101198

APA Style

Yeo, W. -S., Jeong, B., Ullah, N., Shah, M. A., Ali, A., Kim, K. K., & Bae, T. (2021). FtsH Sensitizes Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus to β-Lactam Antibiotics by Degrading YpfP, a Lipoteichoic Acid Synthesis Enzyme. Antibiotics, 10(10), 1198. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10101198

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop