Next Article in Journal
Determination of Susceptibility Breakpoint for Cefquinome against Streptococcus suis in Pigs
Next Article in Special Issue
Supplementation of Live Yeast, Mannan Oligosaccharide, and Organic Selenium during the Adaptation Phase of Newly Arrived Beef Cattle: Effects on Health Status, Immune Functionality, and Growth Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Design, Synthesis and Antifungal Activity of Stapled Aurein1.2 Peptides
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of Chronic Tetracycline Exposure on Human Intestinal Microbiota in a Continuous Flow Bioreactor Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pharmacokinetic Behaviour of Enrofloxacin after Single Intramuscular Dosage in American Black Vultures (Coragyps atratus)

by
Samanta Waxman
1,2,*,
José Julio de Lucas
3,
Guillermo Wiemeyer
1,4,5,
Laura Torres Bianchini
1,4,
Manuel Ignacio San Andrés
3 and
Casilda Rodríguez
3
1
Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Chorroarin 280, Buenos Aires 1427, Argentina
2
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires 1425, Argentina
3
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Veterinary Faculty, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Av. Puerta de Hierro s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
4
Jardín Zoológico de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires, R. de la India 3000, Buenos Aires 1425, Argentina
5
Fundación Caburé-í, Sucre 2842, Buenos Aires 1428, Argentina
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2021, 10(8), 957; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10080957
Submission received: 20 July 2021 / Revised: 2 August 2021 / Accepted: 6 August 2021 / Published: 9 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotic Use in Veterinary)

Abstract

:
The aim of the study was to investigate the intramuscular pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin in black vultures (Coragyps atratus). The pharmacokinetics of a single intramuscular dose (10 mg/kg) of enrofloxacin was studied in six vultures. Plasma concentrations of enrofloxacin and its active metabolite, ciprofloxacin, were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLCuv). Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using non-compartmental and compartmental analysis. After intramuscular administration, enrofloxacin showed a rapid and complete absorption, reaching a Cmax value of 3.26 ± 0.23 μg/mL at 1.75 ± 0.53 h. A long terminal half-life of 19.58 h has been observed. Using previously published MIC values to perform a PK/PD analysis, cumulative fraction responses obtained after Monte Carlo simulation for AUC/MIC > 30, 50 and 125 were 72.93%, 72.34% and 30.86% for E. coli and 89.29%, 88.89% and 58.57% for Mycoplasma synoviae, respectively. Cumulative fraction responses obtained for Cmax/MIC index were 33.93% and 40.18% for E. coli and M. synoviae, respectively. The intramuscular administration of 10 mg/kg could be appropriate to treat infectious diseases caused by gram-positive bacteria with MIC value lower than 1 µg/mL; however, although enrofloxacin showed a slow elimination in black vultures, plasma concentrations were insufficient to reach the gram-negative stablished breakpoints.

1. Introduction

Black vultures, as obligate scavengers, are of great value for their ecosystems by removing carrion and facilitating the flow within the food chain. This species is distributed along the American continent, being widely represented, not only in South and Central America, but also in the south of North America [1,2]. Infectious diseases are a common issue in these New World vultures; they are susceptible to Pasteurella multocida and sepsis involving other gram-negative bacteria, for which a broad-spectrum therapy with, for example, enrofloxacin, is indicated [3,4]. This drug is a fluoroquinolone with concentration-dependent bactericidal effect, good activity against gram-negative organisms, some activity against gram-positive organisms, minimal activity against anaerobic bacteria, but occasional activity against Chlamydia spp., Mycoplasma spp., and Mycobacterium spp. Enrofloxacin may be considered a good choice in cases of pododermatitis, showing evidence of persistent or deep infection [5]. This drug is very frequently used in the treatment of infectious diseases of vultures admitted in wildlife rehabilitation centres by the intramuscular (im) route. This route could represent an interesting alternative to oral administration, in as much as anorexia, regurgitation and emesis have been observed in these species frequently after oral administration of enrofloxacin [6]. Different pharmacokinetic behaviour has been observed in vultures compared to other birds due to a slow elimination of drugs, such as fluroquinolones [7,8] or diclofenac [9]; however, empirical dosage, recommended for other species, is used for black vultures [10]. Dose extrapolation by linear, metabolic, or allometric scaling has limitations and, ideally, dosage recommendations should be based on species-specific pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies [11,12]. Intramuscular administration of enrofloxacin is a practical route of administration, however, studies reporting the intramuscular behaviour of enrofloxacin in birds of prey are scarce [13].
Currently, fluoroquinolones are included into highest priority critically important antimicrobials in human medicine, since they are one of few available therapies for serious Salmonella spp. and E. coli infections [14]. Additionally, they are included in Category B (Restrict) of the categorization of antibiotic used in animals. They should be considered only when there are no antibiotics in Categories Caution or Prudence (C or D) that could be clinically effective and their use should be based on antimicrobial susceptibility testing, whenever possible [15].
For these reasons, a rational use of this drug, based on pharmacological data is necessary. The aim of our study was to investigate the intramuscular pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin in black vultures (Coragyps atratus) and to perform a PK/PD analysis by Monte Carlo simulation using previously published MIC values against isolates obtained from avian species, in order to evaluate the probability of a successful clinical outcome for infections caused by such microorganisms.

2. Results

The individual concentration vs time curves, the final model fits, and the confidence limits (95%) of the predictive check for model evaluation are shown in Figure 1. Measures of central tendency and variability of the pharmacokinetic parameters obtained after non-compartmental and compartmental analysis are shown in Table 1.
Data were best fitted to a monocompartmental model. Monte Carlo simulation of target attainment for a simulated black vulture population after intramuscular administration of enrofloxacin (10 mg/kg) is shown in Table 2 for AUC/MIC ≥ 30, 50 and 125 and Cmax/MIC ≥10 using Escherichia coli and Mycoplasma synoviae MIC values, respectively. Cumulative fraction responses (CFR) obtained after Monte Carlo simulation for AUC/MIC > 30, 50 and 125 were 72.93%, 72.34% and 30.86% for E. coli and 89.29%, 88.89% and 58.58% for M. synoviae, respectively. Cumulative fraction responses obtained for Cmax/MIC index were 33.93% and 40.18% for E. coli and M. synoviae, respectively.

3. Discussion

After intramuscular administration, enrofloxacin showed a rapid and complete absorption, reaching high Cmax and AUC values. Taking into account AUC values from previously published data on intravenously administered enrofloxacin to black vultures [8], a bioavailability value of 90% is estimated. This finding is in agreement with values described in other avian species, which oscillated between 90% and 99% [13,18,19,20,21]. The lowest bioavailability was observed in red-tailed hawk [13], rheas [22], and southern crested caracaras [23]. Very low values of ciprofloxacin plasma concentrations were found in black vultures. After intramuscular administration, ciprofloxacin was detected in only three birds, and only one showed detectable values between 2 to 8 h, which oscillated between 0.051 to 0.064 µg/mL. For these reasons, pharmacokinetic analysis of the active metabolite was not performed.
Compared to other species, black vultures present the highest AUC. The obtained AUC value for vultures is higher to that found for owls (15 mg/kg = 65.3 µg h/mL) [13], but almost two folds those found in houbara bustard or chicken [18,19]. The lowest AUC was found in ratites (ostriches 5 mg/kg = 1 µg h/mL, rheas, 15 mg/kg = 4.18 µg h/mL, ostriches 15 mg/kg = 6.24 µg h/mL) [21,22,24]. If AUC is corrected by the administered dose (AUC/D), in general, birds of prey show high values, black vultures showing the highest one (vultures 7.39; great horned owls 4.35, red tailed hawks 3.60; caracaras 3.44 kg h/L), while ratites show very low values [22,23,24]. These findings could be related to a slow enrofloxacin clearance and a low extraction ratio observed in vultures after intravenous administration [8]. This behaviour could also be related to a long enrofloxacin permanence in black vultures, since elimination half-life showed values higher than 18 h. Compared to other avian species, we observed that vultures present the longest body permanence, with an elimination half-life almost double that observed in chickens (10.6 h) [19], and is almost 20 times longer than in ostriches [21].
These high Cmax and AUC values could be of clinical relevance for a concentration dependent-antimicrobial as enrofloxacin. However, when the probability analysis using a Monte Carlo simulation and previously published pharmacodynamic values is performed, the pharmacokinetic profile does not seem to be enough to reach a clinical outcome. Most experts agree that a Cmax/MIC ratio around 8 to 10 or an AUC/MIC ratio greater than 100 or 125 are associated with clinical success. For this reason, those breakpoints have been taken into account in our study. The probability of target attainment (PTA) findings revealed that the empirical enrofloxacin dose could be appropriate for patients with E. coli or M. synoviae infections with MIC values of 0.125 or 0.25, respectively, when a target cut-off of AUC/MIC > 125 and Cmax/MIC > 10 is to be achieved. However, it has been stated that infections caused by gram-positive bacteria can be successfully treated even when AUC/MIC ratios are lower than 100. Thus, for this kind of infections, a ratio of 50 has been proposed as acceptable [25]. Moreover, Ambrose et al. (2001) [26] have shown that a successful clinical outcome can occur even at AUC/MIC ratios around 30 for community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia. If 30 and 50 cut-off targets were used, PTA > 90% can be obtained for MIC values ≤ 1 μg/mL.
The cumulative fraction of response pertains to the success probability for a treatment without clinical susceptibility of the isolated pathogen. Data from the assessment of CFR (%) for the enrofloxacin dose evaluated in black vultures show that CFR reached <90% for E. coli and M. synoviae at an AUC/MIC of 125 h. The obtained CFR values are very low, barely exceeding 50% for this breakpoint, although this species has shown a slower enrofloxacin elimination and higher Cmax and AUC values than those found in all the previously studied avian species. The estimated values have been slightly better for stablished breakpoints of 30 and 50; especially to M. synoviae, being very close to 90%.

4. Materials and Methods

The experiment was performed in adult healthy black vultures (Coragyps atratus, n = 6), weighing 1.8–2.2 kg, housed at Buenos Aires Zoological Garden, Argentina. Complete physical examination, haematological analysis, maintenance of body weight and routine acceptance of daily meals were used as criteria for selection of healthy animals. No drugs were administered for at least two months prior to the start of the experiment. Vultures were housed in captivity, fed in an appropriate manner for the species, and had access to water ad libitum.
A commercial 5% enrofloxacin injectable solution (Baytril, Bayer, Argentina) was used. Ofloxacin, enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin analytical standards were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain). Stock standard solutions were prepared from the reference standards, dissolved in 0.1 N formic acid in water, and stored at −80 °C. Ofloxacin (Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain) was used as internal standard.
A single 10 mg/kg im administration of enrofloxacin was performed through a 24 G catheter placed in the left ulnar vein. Blood samples (0.6 mL at each time point) were collected from the medial tarsal vein with a 27 G needle attached to a 1 mL heparinized syringe at 0, 10, 15, 35 min, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 11, 24, 29, 34, and 48 h after im administration. For each bird, the total sample volume did not exceed 10% of the blood volume of the animal. Plasma was separated immediately in a refrigerated centrifuge and frozen at −80 °C until analysed.
Sample processing and drug detection methodologies for both enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were slightly modified from a previously published method [23]. Enrofloxacin was quantified using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC/u.v.: Spectra SystemThermo Separation Products Inc., Madrid, Spain) where the separation was accomplished using an ion-pairing reverse-phase column (PR C-18 5 µm 150 × 4.6 mm). No chromatography interferences were observed in the retention time of the analytes. The limit of quantification (LOQ) was 0.025 µg/mL for enrofloxacin and 0.05 µg/mL for ciprofloxacin, and the calibration curve was linear up to 5 µg/mL (R2 > 0.99 for both drugs). LOQ were determined by the lowest point on a linear calibration curve that was within precision and accuracy acceptance criteria. Intraday precision was <8% and inter-day precision was <12%. Accuracy ranged between 82–120% and 88–113%, for enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin, respectively.
Plasma concentrations of enrofloxacin after im administration were subjected to compartmental and non-compartmental analysis using the software package PCnonlinV4.0 (Statistical Consultants Inc., Lexintong, MA, USA). The non-compartmental pharmacokinetic parameters, determined for each individual animal, were: the observed Cmax, Tmax, Clast and Tlast; area under the plasma concentration vs time curve (AUC) [AUC values were calculated using trapezoidal rule from time 0 to the last concentration time point (AUCt)], mean residence time [MRT, where MRT = AUMC/AUC; calculated from time 0 to the last concentration time point (MRTt)], elimination rate constant (λ, calculated as the slope of the terminal phase of the plasma concentration curve that included a minimum of four points) and terminal half-life (t1/2λ, where t1/2λ = 0.693/λ). As the percentage ratio 100 × AUCt/AUCinf exceeds 80% in each subject, these AUCinf values were not considered for the analysis [27]. The monocompartmental parameters were: Estimated Cmax and Tmax; AUC calculated to infinite (AUCinf), absorption (T1/2K01) and elimination (T1/2K10) half-lives.
Pharmacokinetic concentration-time profiles of enrofloxacin administered by the im route were plotted under single dose condition by Monte Carlo simulation, based on the descriptive statistical data obtained for pharmacokinetic parameters (subjects = 100). AUC and Cmax parameters obtained from this simulated curves and previously published MIC values from E. coli strains [16] and M. synoviae [17] were used to perform a PK/PD analysis based on Monte Carlo simulation (subjects = 10,000). A log-normal distribution was assumed for PK parameters. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted using Oracle Crystal 174 Ball V.11.1.1.0.00 software (Oracle Corporation, Redwood Shores, CA, USA). The PK/PD index and pharmacodynamic target associated with the efficacy of enrofloxacin were Cmax/MIC > 10 and AUC/MIC > 30, 50 and 125 [28]. The probability of target attainment, defined as the probability of the dose regimen to achieve a determined PK/PD endpoint for each MIC value and the probability of a dose regimen to achieve a determined PK/PD endpoint taking into account the entire MIC distribution of the tested bacterial population (cumulative fraction of response; CFR), was calculated for the proposed dose regimen of enrofloxacin. PTA and CFR values > 90% were considered adequate [29].

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the im enrofloxacin administration of 10 mg/kg in Coragyps atratus could be appropriate to treat infectious diseases caused by gram-positive bacteria with MIC values lower than 1 µg/mL. However, although enrofloxacin showed a slow elimination in black vultures, the observed plasma concentrations were insufficient to reach the gram-negative stablished breakpoints. However, it should be taken into account that, as there is no data available for birds of prey, the calculations were performed using MIC values against poultry isolates, which are probably higher than those corresponding to wild birds’ populations. Further studies, evaluating higher doses and its adverse reactions, should be performed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.W., M.I.S.A. and C.R.; formal analysis, J.J.d.L.; funding acquisition, S.W.; investigation, S.W., J.J.d.L., G.W. and L.T.B.; methodology, S.W., G.W. and L.T.B.; project administration, S.W.; resources, M.I.S.A.; supervision, S.W., J.J.d.L., M.I.S.A. and C.R.; validation, S.W., J.J.d.L. and C.R.; visualization, M.I.S.A. and C.R.; writing—original draft, S.W. and C.R.; writing—review and editing, S.W., J.J.d.L., G.W., L.T.B., M.I.S.A. and C.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was performed as part of an UBACyT Project, Secretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad de Buenos Aires.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Veterinary Sciences School, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina (authorization reference number 2008/19).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to M.A. Rivolta from Buenos Aires Zoological Garden. Thanks to the staff of the Biblioteca de la Facultad de Veterinaria (BUCM), especially Mar Sanz, Cristina Canchado and Carmen Muñoz Serrano, for their invaluable help, Mariano Díaz for his technical assistance and Santiago Cano for his advice.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Available online: www.iucnredlist.org (accessed on 19 May 2021).
  2. Holland, A.E.; Byrne, M.E.; Bryan, A.L.; DeVault, T.L.; Rhodes, O.E.; Beasley, J.C. Fine-scale assessment of home ranges and activity patterns for resident black vultures (Coragyps atratus) and turkey vultures (Cathartes aura). PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Graham, J.E.; Heatley, J.J. Emergency Care of Raptors. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Exot. Anim. Pract. 2007, 10, 395–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Summa, N.M.; Sanchez-Migallon Guzman, D. Evidence-Based Advances in Avian Medicine. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Exot. Anim. Pract. 2017, 20, 817–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Blair, J.; Bumblefoot, A. Comparison of Clinical Presentation and Treatment of Pododermatitis in Rabbits, Rodents, and Birds. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Exot. Anim. Pract. 2013, 16, 715–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Stout, J.D. Common Emergencies in Pet Birds. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Exot. Anim. Pract. 2016, 19, 513–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. García-Montijano, M.; Waxman, S.; de Lucas, J.J.; Luaces, I.; San Andrés, M.D.; Rodríguez, C. Disposition of marbofloxacin in vulture (Gyps fulvus) after intravenous administration of a single dose. Res. Vet. Sci. 2011, 90, 288–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Waxman, S.; Prados, A.P.; de Lucas, J.J.; Wiemeyer, G.; Torres-Bianchini, L.; San Andrés, M.I. Evaluation of allometric scaling as a tool for extrapolation of the enrofloxacin dose in American black vultures (Coragyps atratus). Am. J. Vet. Res. 2019, 80, 727–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Naidoo, V.; Wolter, K.; Cuthbert, R.; Duncan, N. Veterinary diclofenac threatens Africa’s endangered vulture species. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2009, 53, 205–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hawkins, M.G.; Sanchez-Migallon Guzman, D.; Beaufrêre, H.; Lennox, A.; Carpenter, J.W. Antimicrobial Agents Used in Birds. In Exotic Animal Formulary, 5th ed.; Carpenter, J.W., Ed.; Elsevier Saunders: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2018; pp. 167–189. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hunter, R.P.; Mahmood, I.; Martinez, M.N. Prediction of xenobiotic clearance in avian species using mammalian or avian data: How accurate is the prediction? J. Vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 2008, 31, 281–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hunter, R.P.; Isaza, R. Concepts and issues with interspecies scaling in zoological pharmacology. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2008, 39, 517–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Harrestein, L.A.; Tell, L.A.; Vulliet, R.; Needham, M.; Brandt, C.M.; Brondos, A.; Stedman, B.; Kass, P.H. Disposition of enrofloxacin in red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis) and great horned owls (Bubo virginianus) after a single oral, intramuscular or intravenous dose. J. Avian Med. Surg. 2000, 14, 228–236. [Google Scholar]
  14. Critically Important Antimicrobials for Human Medicine 6th Revision. 2018. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/312266/9789241515528-eng.pdf (accessed on 15 May 2021).
  15. Categorization of Antibiotics Used in Animals Promotes Responsible Use to Protect Public and Animal Health EMA/688114/2020. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/categorisation-antibiotics-used-animals-promotes-responsible-use-protect-public-animal-health (accessed on 10 May 2021).
  16. Vanni, M.; Meucci, V.; Tognetti, R.; Cagnardi, P.; Montesissa, C.; Piccirillo, A.; Rossi, A.M.; Di Bello, D.; Intorre, L. Fluoroquinolone resistance and molecular characterization of gyrA and parC quinolone resistance-determining regions in Escherichia coli isolated from poultry. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 856–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Gerchman, I.; Lysnyansky, I.; Perk, S.; Levisohn, S. In vitro susceptibilities to fluoroquinolones in current and archived Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae isolates from meat-type turkeys. Vet. Microbiol. 2008, 131, 266–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Abd el-Aziz, M.I.; Aziz, M.A.; Soliman, F.A. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of enrofloxacin in chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 1997, 38, 164–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bugyei, K.; Black, W.D.; McEwen, S. Pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin given by the oral, intravenous and intramuscular routes in broiler chickens. Can. J. Vet. Res. 1999, 63, 193–200. [Google Scholar]
  20. Bailey, T.A.; Sheen, R.S.; Silvanose, C.; Samour, J.H.; Garner, A.; Harron, D.W. Pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin after intravenous, intramuscular and oral administration in houbara bustard (Chlamydotis undulata macqueenii). J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 1998, 21, 288–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. de Lucas, J.J.; Rodriguez, C.; Waxman, S.; González, F.; Uriarte, I.; San Andrés, M.I. Pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin after single intravenous and intramuscular administration in young domestic ostrich (Struthio camelus). J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 2004, 27, 119–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. de Lucas, J.J.; Navarro, J.L.; Rubio, S.; Vignolo, P.E.; Asis, V.C.; González, F.; Rodríguez, C. Pharmacokinetic behaviour of enrofloxacin in greater rheas following a single-dose intramuscular administration. Vet. J. 2008, 175, 136–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Waxman, S.; Prados, A.P.; de Lucas, J.; San Andres, M.I.; Sassaroli, J.C.; Orozco, M.; Argibay, H.; Rodriguez, C. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of enrofloxacin in southern crested caracaras (Caracara plancus). J. Avian Med. Surg. 2013, 27, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. de Lucas, J.J.; Solano, J.; González, F.; Ballesteros, C.; San Andrés, M.I.; Martín Von Kauffmann, C.; Rodríguez, C. Pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin after multiple subcutaneous and intramuscular administrations in adult ostriches. Br. Poult. Sci. 2013, 54, 391–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Drusano, G.L.; Johnson, D.E.; Rosen, M.; Standiford, H.C. Pharmacodynamics of a fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent in a neutropenic rat model of Pseudomonas sepsis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1993, 37, 483–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Ambrose, P.G.; Grasela, D.M.; Grasela, T.H.; Passarell, J.; Mayer, H.B.; Pierce, P.F. Pharmacodynamics of fluoroquinolones against Streptococcus pneumoniae in patients with community-acquired respiratory tract infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45, 2793–2797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Hauschke, D.; Steinijans, V.; Pigeot, I. Bioequivalence Studies in Drug Development: Methods and Application; Hoboken, N.J., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: Chichester, UK, 2007; pp. 175–177. [Google Scholar]
  28. Papich, M.G. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling and the rational selection of dosage regimes for the prudent use of antimicrobial drugs. Vet. Microbiol. 2014, 171, 480–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Asín-Prieto, E.; Rodríguez-Gascón, A.; Isla, A. Applications of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis of antimicrobial agents. J. Infect. Chemother. 2015, 21, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Plasma concentrations vs time profiles of enrofloxacin after a single intramuscular dose of 10 mg/kg in Coragyps atratus (n = 6). Solid lines show the final model fits. Shaded grey represents the confidence intervals of 95% of the predictive check for model evaluation after Monte Carlo simulation. Observed values of each bird are shown in greyscale.
Figure 1. Plasma concentrations vs time profiles of enrofloxacin after a single intramuscular dose of 10 mg/kg in Coragyps atratus (n = 6). Solid lines show the final model fits. Shaded grey represents the confidence intervals of 95% of the predictive check for model evaluation after Monte Carlo simulation. Observed values of each bird are shown in greyscale.
Antibiotics 10 00957 g001
Table 1. Pharmacokinetic parameters obtained after enrofloxacin intramuscular administration (10 mg/kg) in black vultures (Coragyps atratus) (n = 6).
Table 1. Pharmacokinetic parameters obtained after enrofloxacin intramuscular administration (10 mg/kg) in black vultures (Coragyps atratus) (n = 6).
Pharmacokinetic ParameterMeanMedianGeometric MeanStandard DeviationRangeCV (%)
Non-Compartmental
Tmax (h)1.752.081.670.531.0530.3
Cmax (µg/mL)3.263.253.250.230.737.1
T1/2λ (h) 119.5819.5119.451.745.328.9
AUCt (µg·h/mL)60.4163.3960.007.4917.8912.4
MRTt (h) 117.0016.9716.960.962.905.6
Tlast (h)48.6248.6648.620.200.450.4
Clast (µg/mL)0.550.580.550.100.2418.2
Monocompartmental
AUCinf (µg·h/mL)75.7980.4475.0511.226.9714.8
T1/2K01 (h) 10.240.250.230.070.1829.2
T1/2K10 (h) 118.1618.5617.991.864.9610.2
Tmax (h)1.531.621.490.370.924.2
Cmax (µg/mL)2.722.722.720.180.496.61
1 Harmonic mean.
Table 2. Monte Carlo simulation (n = 10000 subjects) of target attainment for a simulated black vulture population after intramuscular administration of enrofloxacin at 10 mg/kg for MIC distribution of E. coli and M. synoviae previously published [16,17].
Table 2. Monte Carlo simulation (n = 10000 subjects) of target attainment for a simulated black vulture population after intramuscular administration of enrofloxacin at 10 mg/kg for MIC distribution of E. coli and M. synoviae previously published [16,17].
PK/PD Index PTA (%) with an E. coli MIC
0.0080.0160.030.060.1250.250.5124816
AUC/MIC = 125 10010010010010050.120.0100000
CFR (%)30.86
AUC/MIC = 50 1001001001001001001001000.15000
CFR (%)72.34
AUC/MIC = 30 10010010010010010010010069.71000
CFR (%)72.93
Cmax/MIC > 10 10010010010010094.31000000
CFR (%)33.93
PTA (%) with an M. synoviae MIC
0.10.250.512.510
AUC/MIC = 125 10010050.87000
CFR (%)58.57
AUC/MIC = 50 10010010010000
CFR (%)88.89
AUC/MIC = 30 1001001001007.270
CFR (%)89.29
Cmax/MIC > 10 10087.20000
CFR (%)40.18
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Waxman, S.; de Lucas, J.J.; Wiemeyer, G.; Torres Bianchini, L.; San Andrés, M.I.; Rodríguez, C. Pharmacokinetic Behaviour of Enrofloxacin after Single Intramuscular Dosage in American Black Vultures (Coragyps atratus). Antibiotics 2021, 10, 957. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10080957

AMA Style

Waxman S, de Lucas JJ, Wiemeyer G, Torres Bianchini L, San Andrés MI, Rodríguez C. Pharmacokinetic Behaviour of Enrofloxacin after Single Intramuscular Dosage in American Black Vultures (Coragyps atratus). Antibiotics. 2021; 10(8):957. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10080957

Chicago/Turabian Style

Waxman, Samanta, José Julio de Lucas, Guillermo Wiemeyer, Laura Torres Bianchini, Manuel Ignacio San Andrés, and Casilda Rodríguez. 2021. "Pharmacokinetic Behaviour of Enrofloxacin after Single Intramuscular Dosage in American Black Vultures (Coragyps atratus)" Antibiotics 10, no. 8: 957. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10080957

APA Style

Waxman, S., de Lucas, J. J., Wiemeyer, G., Torres Bianchini, L., San Andrés, M. I., & Rodríguez, C. (2021). Pharmacokinetic Behaviour of Enrofloxacin after Single Intramuscular Dosage in American Black Vultures (Coragyps atratus). Antibiotics, 10(8), 957. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10080957

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop