Next Article in Journal
Clinical Impact of Vancomycin Treatment in Ampicillin-Susceptible Enterococci Bloodstream Infections
Previous Article in Journal
Detecting Carbapenemases in Animal and Food Samples by Droplet Digital PCR
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Epidemiology of Carbapenem-Resistant K. pneumoniae Clinical Isolates from the Adult Patients with Comorbidities in a Tertiary Hospital, Southern Saudi Arabia

by
Abdullah M. Alshahrani
1,
Mutasim E. Ibrahim
2,*,
Ahmed K. Aldossary
1,
Mushabab A. Alghamdi
3,
Omar B. Ahmed
4 and
Aref A. Bin Abdulhak
5
1
Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Bisha, Bisha 67614, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Basic Medical Sciences (Microbiology Unit), College of Medicine, University of Bisha, Bisha 67614, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Bisha, Bisha 67614, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Environmental and Health Research, The Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques Institute for Hajj and Umrah Research, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia
5
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52240, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2022, 11(12), 1697; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11121697
Submission received: 28 October 2022 / Revised: 21 November 2022 / Accepted: 23 November 2022 / Published: 25 November 2022

Abstract

:
Hospitalized patients are likely to have chronic illnesses and are at an increased risk of mortality due to infection caused by MDR bacteria. We aimed to identify carbapenem-resistant genes carrying Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) isolates and their risk factors recovered from adult patients with comorbidities. A cross-sectional study was carried out between April 2021 and December 2021 at King Abdullah Hospital (KAH) in Bisha province, Saudi Arabia. Seventy-one multi-drug resistant K. pneumoniae recovered from clinical samples and screened for carbapenemase genes of blaOXA-48-like, blaNDM-1, blaKPC, blaVIM, and blaIMP. Of 71 MDR K. pneumoniae examined, 47 (66.2%) isolates harbored various carbapenemase genes. The most prevalent single resistance gene was blaOXA-48-like (62.5%; n = 25), and 33.3% of them were recovered from sputum isolates. The blaNDM-1 gene was detected in 12 (30.0%) isolates, and eight of them were recovered from urine (n = 4) and blood (n = 4). Two (5.0%) single blaKPC genes were recovered from the sputum (n = 1) and blood (n = 1) isolates. In contrast, no blaIMP- and blaVIM-carrying isolates were detected. The co-existence of two resistance genes between blaOXA-48-like and blaNDM-1 was found in six strains, whereas only one strain was found to be produced in the three genes of blaNDM-1, blaKPC, and blaOXA-48-like. There were statistically significant associations between the presence of carbapenem-gene-carrying K. pneumoniae and patients’ gender (χ2(1) = 5.94, p = 0.015), intensive care unit admission (χ2(1) = 7.649, p = 0.002), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (χ2(1) = 4.851, p = 0.028). The study highlighted the existence of carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae, particularly blaOXA-48-like and blaNDM-1, in patients with comorbidities. Our findings emphasize the importance of the molecular characterization of resistance-determinant-carrying bacterial pathogens as a part of infection control and prevention in hospital settings.

1. Introduction

Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) has emerged as a major human pathogen implicated in infections in hospital settings globally [1]. The treatment of infections caused by K. pneumoniae has been a significant threat due to their capability to acquire rapid mechanisms of various antibiotic resistance traits to the several groups of antimicrobial agents [2]. The multidrug-resistant (MDR) trait in K. pneumoniae has been recognized in healthcare settings as a cause of high morbidity and mortality among patients with severe infections [3]. Such MDR strains carry a wide range of antimicrobial resistance gene elements that restrict the options for treating K. pneumoniae infection [1].
Carbapenems are effective and reliable β-lactam antibiotics often used as the last option for treating severe infections caused by MDR Gram-negative bacteria, including K. pneumoniae [4]. However, the increasing use of carbapenems has resulted in the emergence of carbapenem-hydrolyzing β-lactamases (carbapenemases) as a common mechanism of resistance to carbapenem agents [5]. Among the Enterobacteriaceae group, clinically significant carbapenemases are the Ambler molecular class A (blaKPC), class B (blaVIM, blaIMP, blaNDM-1), and class D (blaOXA-48-like) types. These types are commonly found in K. pneumoniae and are frequently associated with serious nosocomial infections and outbreaks [5].
The genetic diversity and burden of carbapenem resistance in K. pneumoniae have been studied in Saudi Arabia. A previous study among hospitalized patients in Saudi Arabia indicated that blaOXA-48-like and blaNDM-1 are the dominant carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae, including K. pneumoniae [6]. A study in a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh capital reported an outbreak of multi-drug carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infection carrying the blaOXA-48-like gene [7]. A more recent study at four main tertiary care hospitals of Makkah in the western region of Saudi Arabia reported the emergence of MDR K. pneumoniae co-harboring blaKPC, blaNDM-1, and blaOXA-48-like genes [8]. Due to increased carbapenemase-producing bacteria in hospital settings, understanding the resistance mechanisms will offer valuable insights into their management.
However, there are still knowledge gaps and a lack of data in many hospitals in Saudi Arabia regarding carbapenemase-producing bacterial pathogens. This limitation is a significant health concern in hospital settings, as treating patients with nosocomial infections can be associated with high antimicrobial resistance patterns [9]. In addition, hospitalized patients are likely to have chronic illnesses and are at an increased risk of mortality due to infection caused by MDR bacteria [10,11]. A recent study found that infection caused by carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, when associated with comorbidities, can lead to a high mortality rate [11]. Furthermore, research evidence indicated that patients with comorbidities have longer exposure time in hospitals, tend to be hospitalized, and are under prolonged antibiotic therapy, which are relevant risk factors for carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infection [11,12]. Herein, we characterize the molecular epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant genes carrying K. pneumoniae isolated from adult patients with comorbidities. We also aimed to identify predictors of carbapenemase gene acquisition in this population.

2. Materials and Methods

A cross-sectional study was carried out between April 2021 and December 2021 at King Abdullah Hospital (KAH) in Bisha province, Saudi Arabia. This hospital is a referral hospital with 400 beds, including various specialties, serving various patient groups, and covering most populations of different areas in Bisha province and surrounding areas. Adult patients more than 22 years old with diverse chronic comorbidities at the KAH were recruited in the study. Information about patients’ demographic characteristics, detailed records of clinical features, and types of chronic illness present were collected from patient files and hospital databases without violating patient identities. Ethical approval was obtained from Research Ethics Local Committee at the College of Medicine, University of Bisha, Saudi Arabia.

2.1. Bacterial Isolates

K. pneumoniae was recovered from various clinical samples at the microbiology laboratory as part of routine care for hospitalized patients. Clinical samples were cultured on blood agar and MacConkey agar plates (Oxoid Co., Cheshire, England). The isolates were tentatively identified using colony morphology, Gram stain, oxidase, and conventional biochemical tests. Complete identification was confirmed by VITEK II automatic system (bioMerieux, Marcy l’E’toile, France) using the card for Gram-negative strains (ID-GNB) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. E. coli ATCC 25922 served as a control strain and was included in each VITEK run testing step. The sampling represented a single collection, and each patient was sampled only once. Infected patients infected with two different bacterial pathogens were excluded from the study.

2.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

The antimicrobial susceptibility testing of K. pneumoniae was examined using Vitex II cards (AST-N292) (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. The following antimicrobial agents were tested: amikacin (AK), ampicillin (AMP), amoxicillin/clavulanate (AMC), aztreonam (ATM), ceftriaxone (CRO), cefepime (CFPM), cefuroxime (CXM), ciprofloxacin (CIP), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT), colistin (CST), gentamicin (GN), imipenem (IPM), meropenem (MEM), piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP), and tigecycline (TGC) (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations were used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and breakpoints [13]. MDR K. pneumoniae was defined as non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories [14]. K pneumoniae ATCC 700603 and E. coli ATCC 25922 were used as quality control strains. The isolates were immediately stored in brain heart infusion broth containing 20% glycerol at −86 °C for further genetic analysis.

2.3. Genetic Analysis of MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates

2.3.1. Detection of Antibiotic Resistance Genes

The K. pneumoniae isolates were screened for the carbapenemase genes of blaOXA-48-like, blaNDM-1, blaKPC, blaVIM, and blaIMP using a multiplex PCR assay, as previously described [15].

2.3.2. DNA Extraction

Deoxyribonucleic acid was extracted from the isolates using the boiling method [16]. In brief, a single pure colony of each strain was mixed in 100 μL sterile free RNA distilled water. The suspension was boiled in a water bath at 95 °C for 10 min, and then the cell debris was precipitated by centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 5 min. Finally, the supernatant was removed to a new sterile Eppendorf tube and used directly as a template.
DNA template was subjected to multiplex PCR to amplify the target resistance genes. The oligonucleotide primers used in this study are shown in Table 1. The PCR reaction was carried out at a total volume of 50 µL. Each reaction mixture contained 25 µL of HotStarTaq Plus Master Mix (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany), 4 µL of DNA template, a variable volume of a specific primer group, and 9 µL of nuclease-free water. The Eppendorf Master cycler Gradient instrument was used for the amplification of the target genes with the following optimal cycling conditions: Initial heat activation at 95 °C for 5 min, 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 45 s, annealing (for blaOXA-48-like and blaNDM-1 genes optimized at 55 °C for 45 s for blaIMP, blaVIM, and blaKPC genes optimized at 53 °C for 45 s), extension at 72 °C for 1 min and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The amplification products were visualized under ultraviolet illumination at a wavelength of 312 nm after running at 85 volts for 60 min on 2% agarose containing ethidium bromide (1 µg/mL). A 100-bp DNA ladder (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) was used as a standard molecular weight to determine the size of the PCR products. DNA from reference blaCTX-M, blaTEM, and blaOXA-like-positive strains was used as a positive control.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The outcome data were entered and analyzed using IBM SPSS version 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The descriptive statistics were used in terms of frequency, proportions, means, and standard deviations. The Chi-square test was used to determine the relationships between the presence of the resistance-gene-carrying isolates and the patients’ general and clinical characteristics.

3. Results

3.1. Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics of Study Participants

A total of 71 K. pneumoniae were collected from adult patients with chronic diseases, of whom 38 (53.5%) were males and 33 (46.5%) were females. The mean (±SD) age of patients was 66.15 (±18.6) years, with age ranges from 25 to 44 years (young adults) (37%), 45 to 64 years (35%), and ≥65 years (28%). The isolates were recovered from samples of sputum (25; 35.2%), urine (24; 33.8%), blood (12; 16.9%), wound pus (8; 11.3%), and tracheal aspirate (TIP) (2; 2.8%). Most of the isolates were from the intensive care unit (ICU) (37; 52.1%), medical department (MID) (14; 19.7%), chronic high-dependency unit (CHDU) (9; 12.7%), critical care unit (CCU) (7; 9.9%), urology (4; 5.6%), and emergency (2; 2.8%). Most of the patients have diabetes mellitus (46; 64.8%), hypertension (HTN) (42; 59.2%), being with cerebrovascular accident (CVA) (19; 26.8%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (17; 23.9%), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (15; 21.1%), heart diseases (14; 19.7%), and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) (4; 5.6%). Of the 71 patients, 23 (32.4%) have single comorbidities, 25 (35.2%) have two comorbidities, 10 (14.1%) have three comorbidities, 11 (15.5%) have four comorbidities, and two (2.8%) have five comorbidities.

3.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Table 2 summarizes the rates of the resistance of K. pneumoniae to several types of antibiotics. Overall, the highest resistance rate was found for ampicillin (100%), followed by cefuroxime (90.1%), ceftriaxone (85.9%), aztreonam, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (81.7%, each). Resistance to tigecycline (5.6%) and colistin (12.7%) was less common. The isolates from the ICU revealed the highest resistance rates to the tested antibiotic compared to those isolated from other wards.

3.3. Screening of PCR for Resistance Genes

Of 71 MDR K. pneumoniae screened for five resistance genes, 47 (66.2%) isolates harbored various carbapenemase genes (Figure 1). The resistance profile and epidemiological characteristics of the isolate-carrying genes are shown in Supplementary Material Table S1. Most of these 47 isolates were recovered from patients in the ICU (30; 63.8%) followed by medical (7; 14.9%), CHDU (5; 10.6%), CCU (3; 6.4%), and urology (2; 4.3%). The isolates were collected from clinical samples of sputum (17; 36.2%), urine (14; 29.8%), blood (9; 19.1%), wound pus (5; 10.6%), and tracheal aspirate (2; 4.3%).
Figure 2 illustrates the distribution of the resistance genes collected from different clinical specimens. Single resistance genes were found among 40 isolates collected from the clinical specimens. The most prevalent single resistance gene was blaOXA-48-like (62.5%; n = 25), and 33.3% of them were recovered from the sputum isolates. blaNDM-1 gene was detected in 12(30.0%) isolates, and eight of them were recovered from urine (n = 4) and blood (n = 4). Two (5.0%) single KPC genes were recovered from sputum (n = 1) and blood (n = 1) isolates. In contrast, no blaIMP- and blaVIM-carrying isolates were detected.
Combinations of two resistance genes between blaNDM-1 and blaOXA-48-like were found in six strains. Furthermore, combinations of three resistance genes of blaNDM-1, blaKPC, and blaOXA-48-like were found in one isolate. Most of these gene combinations were recovered from urine isolates (Figure 2).
Figure 3 illustrates the distribution of resistance genes among hospital wards. Out of the 40 single resistance genes, 26 (65%) were recovered from ICU isolates, namely blaOXA-48-like (n = 19), blaNDM-1 (n = 5), and blaKPC (n = 2). Combinations of two resistance genes were detected in six strains, four from the ICU and two from the medical department. One strain harboring three genes of blaNDM-1, blaKPC, and blaOXA-48-like was recovered from the medical strain.
Table 3 summarizes the frequency of resistance-gene-carrying K. pneumoniae among studied patients based on the number of comorbidities. Of the 71 patients with different comorbidities, resistance-gene-carrying isolates were detected in 47 (66.2%) patients. Resistance-gene-carrying isolates were detected in 81.4% of patients with four comorbidities, in 73.9% of patients with single comorbidity, in 70% of patients with three comorbidities, and in 52% of patients with two comorbidities. The types and distribution of comorbidities are shown in Table 3.

3.4. Factors Associated with Presence of Resistance Genes

Table 4 shows the analysis of several factors in relation to the tested carbapenemase-gene-carrying K. pneumoniae isolates. Generally, the isolates recovered from patients with comorbidities are most likely to have high proportions of antibiotic-resistant genes than those without comorbidities. There were statistically significant associations between the presence of resistance-gene-carrying isolates and gender (χ2(1) = 5.94, p = 0.015), ICU admission (χ2(1) = 7.649, p = 0.002), CVA (χ2(1) = 6.729, p = 0.009), and COPD (χ2(1) = 4.851, p = 0.028). There was no statistically significant association between patient age groups, the presence of DM, HTN, CKD, HD, or CVD, the number of comorbidities, and the presence of resistance-gene-carrying isolates.

4. Discussion

K. pneumoniae is commonly resistant to multiple antibiotics and is considered a source of antimicrobial resistance genes, which can move to other Gram-negative pathogens [9,18]. In the present study, we characterized carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae and their predicted factors among hospitalized patients with various comorbidities. We applied a multiplex PCR assay to screen the carbapenemase genes of blaOXA-48-like, blaIMP, blaVIM, blaKPC, and blaNDM-1, which are known as relevant acquired genes commonly identified in clinical Enterobacteriaceae isolates worldwide [17]. The present study showed that the production of blaOXA-48-like is the most frequent carbapenemase gene in K. pneumoniae. However, most isolates displayed a single carbapenemases gene, of which blaOXA-48-like (62.5%) was the most predominant. These results agree with several studies conducted in Saudi Arabia. For instance, a recent study involving thirteen tertiary hospitals across Saudi Arabia found that the overall prevalence of blaOXA-48-like carrying K. pneumoniae was 71.2%. Furthermore, the proportion of blaOXA-48-like was reported at 71% in Asir and 83% in Al Baha, southern Saudi Arabia [19]. Furthermore, in a multicenter study across Saudi Arabia, the blaOXA-48-like gene was reported as 69.3% in K. pneumoniae and Escherichia coli isolated from patients over 14 years old [10]. The predominant blaOXA-48-like gene among K. pneumoniae clinical isolates has been documented in other studies in Saudi Arabia [6,20,21]. These findings, coupled with our present results, prove the increased proportion of K. pneumonia harboring the blaOXA-48-like gene in different geographical areas of the country. Likewise, a high frequency of blaOXA-48-like among K. pneumoniae has been reported in a study of a cross-Gulf cooperation council, including Saudi Arabia. Zowawi et al. indicated that multiple clones of blaOXA-48-like- producing K. pneumoniae are circulating within hospitals in the Gulf Cooperation Council. This finding suggests that blaOXA-48-like producers have been prevalent in hospitals in the region for a prolonged period [20].
The present study found that blaNDM-1 was the second most frequent carbapenemase gene in our isolates, which agrees with that reported in the country [6,19,20]. Likewise, blaNDM-1-carrying K. pneumoniae isolates have been reported in neighboring countries such as Yemen [22], Kuwait [23], and the Sultanate of Oman [24]. blaNDM-1 gene-carrying strains can harbor multiple chromosomally and plasmid-encoded resistance genes resulting in a multi-drug-resistant trait [5]. Additionally, it has been found that blaNDM-1 can inactivate approximately all beat-lactams except aztreonam. Unfortunately, eradicating infections caused by blaNDM-1 producers is difficult because treatment options are minimal [25]. The spread of blaOXA-48-like- and blaNDM-1-carrying isolates in Saudi Arabia hospitals might be due to a high frequency of expatriates and population movement between Saudi Arabia and other parts of the world, such as the Middle East region and the Indian subcontinent [5,26].
We found a low incidence of blaKPC genes and an absence of the blaVIM and blaIMP genes. In a study that examined carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (n = 60) from hospitalized patients in Saudi Arabia, Shibl et al. found that forty-seven isolates harbored blaOXA-48-like, 12 were positive for blaNDM, and one for blaVIM. No isolate harbored a combination of these resistance genes. In addition, no isolate harbored blaKPC or blaIMP [5]. Consistently, another study reported the absence of blaVIM, blaKPC, and blaIMP, suggesting that these genes are not significant sources of carbapenem resistance in Saudi Arabia. This may partly be because these carbapenemase-producing bacteria are common in countries with low population flow to and from Saudi Arabia [6].
The co-existence and evolution of antibiotic-resistant genes are one of the most worrying possibilities, as they can lead to the emergence of untreatable invasive K. pneumoniae infections [10,27]. In this study, the production of two resistance genes in a single isolate was shared between blaOXA-48-like and blaNDM-1. This finding is consistent with a previous study in Saudi Arabia, where the co-production of blaOXA-48-like and blaNDM-1 was detected in K. pneumoniae isolated from hospitalized patients in 2012 [6]. A previous study in Riyadh capital, the central region of Saudi Arabia, observed the emergence of MDR K. pneumoniae harboring blaOXA-48-like and blaNDM-1. However, no isolate had a combination of these resistance genes. [5]. In eastern Saudi Arabia, a study conducted in two hospitals found combinations of blaOXA-48-like and blaNDM-1 with other genes of ESBL resistance, fluoroquinolone resistance, and aminoglycoside resistance among extensively drug-resistant K. pneumoniae strains [2].
Interestingly, we found the co-existence of triple genes of blaNDM-1, blaKPC, and blaOXA-48-like was detected in one isolate. This is consistent with findings from four tertiary care hospitals in the Makkah region, Saudi Arabia, indicating the emergence of K. pneumoniae clinical isolates harboring this combination of carbapenemase-resistant genes [8]. The dissemination and co-evolution of such a co-existence of antibiotic-resistant genes is a health concern, which might lead to untreatable K. pneumoniae infections.
The emergence of carbapenemase-producing Gram-negatives is of concern because it is often associated with the occurrence of MDR isolates, which leads to the limitation of therapeutic options [20]. In the present study, the results of antibiotic susceptibility of K. pneumoniae isolates are in keeping with the reported MDR phenotype associated with detected carbapenemase genes of blaOXA-48-like, blaNDM-1, and blaKPC. However, the K. pneumoniae isolates showed high resistance to various antibiotic groups, including the carbapenem class. Resistance to carbapenem can be due to other mechanisms, such as the production of AmpC and ESBL or structural changes in the outer membrane [6,7].
Polymyxins and tigecycline are treatment options for carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infections, but their use is limited by concerns about their efficacy and safety [28]. K. pneumoniae isolates from our hospital showed a worrying increase in tigecycline and colistin resistance, which are the last effective drugs of choice [29]. This is in line with a study carried out in three hospitals in Riyadh, where the rate of tigecycline resistance to K. pneumoniae obtained from hospitalized patients was 4.8% [21]. In addition, resistance to colistin has been observed among K. pneumoniae isolates from inpatients in Riyadh city [5]. Similarly, the proportion of resistance to tigecycline(12.5%) was determined among K. pneumoniae collected from patients in two hospitals in the eastern Province of Saudi Arabia [2]. The occurrence of carbapenemase-producing bacteria and increasing their resistance to colistin and tigecycline might challenge public health. Therefore, implementing effective control strategies to combat the spreading of carbapenemase producers is needed.
Identifying risk factors for carbapenemase-producing bacterial pathogens is critical for selecting appropriate therapy and maintaining effective control and prevention plans [12,30]. The present finding indicates that ICU patients were at risk of acquiring infection with K. pneumoniae carrying carbapenemase during their course of admission to the ICU. ICU admission has been observed as a predictor of infection with carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae [31,32] and the emergence and spread of MDR bacteria in many studies [27,33,34,35]. The high prevalence of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae in ICU may be related to the heavy use of invasive procedures, the immune suppressant condition of ICU patients, the presence of multiple infections in patients, and the extensive usage of high-grade antimicrobials [34]. To reduce the risk of spreading MDR pathogens, infection prevention strategies and screening the patients for carbapenemase and other resistance-determinant-carrying bacteria should be designed during ICU admission.
In the present study, patients with comorbidities are most likely to acquire carbapenem-resistance-gene-carrying K. pneumoniae. A systematic review and meta-analysis of mortality of patients with comorbidities associated with carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infections found a high proportion of mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and liver disease. However, the risk of death from carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae was twice as high as the number of deaths associated with carbapenem-susceptible K. pneumoniae (p < 0.00001) [11]. Patients with comorbidities are usually immune compromised, are usually undergoing invasive medical procedures, tend to be prolonged hospital stays, and are exposed to different types of antibiotics, which increase the opportunity to acquire infection with carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae [11]. On the other hand, our findings showed that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary infections were significantly at high risk of acquiring carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae. Research evidence indicates that respiratory tract infection is the most common infection among all infections among hospitalized patients [11]. It is well known that hospitalized patients with critical respiratory tract infections are usually under invasive intubation procedures and at high risk of the exogenous acquisition of antibiotic-resistant bacteria through direct and indirect contact, which might be factors for the spread of carbapenemase genes [34]. Our result did not find a significant association between the acquisition of carbapenemase-gene-carrying K. pneumoniae and the number of comorbidities; however, these three or more comorbidities were found to be an independent risk factor for carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infections in a recent study [11].

Limitations of the Study

Our study had several limitations: First, this study was a single-center study. Second, we used small numbers of isolates to analyze limited numbers of predicted factors of carbapenemase producers. A systematic review and meta-analysis showed that eighteen factors might increase the risk of carbapenem resistance in K. pneumoniae infection [36]. However, a survey on a large scale using multivariate analysis might show a clear correlation between the presence of carbapenemase producers and other patients’ clinical characteristics, such as admission outcomes, antibiotics use, and hospitalization history. Third, we characterized only clinical MDR strains collected from patients with comorbidity to evaluate carbapenemase production, which might generate a selection bias. Fourth, the study analyzed the major resistance determinant of carbapenem; other minor carbapenemase genes of blaGIM, blaSIM, blaAIM, blaDIM, and blaBIC were not investigated to achieve a better evaluation of actual prevalence.

5. Conclusions

The study highlighted the existence of carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae, particularly blaOXA-48-like and blaNDM-1, in patients with comorbidities in our hospital setting. Therefore, the early detection of carbapenemase producers, tracking the source of resistant isolates, and isolation of patients at risk of carbapenemase carriage are important. Our findings emphasize the importance of the routine implementation of molecular characterization assays in the hospital laboratory for the appropriate detection of resistance-determinant-carrying bacterial pathogens and a better understanding of the mechanism of antibiotic resistance. The study will be a valuable reference for further research to identify the predictor factors of acquisition carbapenemase-producing microorganisms. However, regression analysis with large sample size is needed to obtain accurate findings to this association.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics11121697/s1, Table S1: Epidemiological characteristics and resistant profiles of carbapenemase resistant genes carrying K. pneumoniae recovered from adult patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.A. and M.E.I.; methodology, A.M.A.; A.K.A. and O.B.A.; software, M.E.I. and M.A.A.; validation, A.M.A., M.E.I. and O.B.A.; formal analysis, M.E.I. and A.A.B.A.; investigation, A.M.A., M.A.A. and M.E.I.; resources, A.M.A., A.K.A. and M.E.I.; data curation, A.M.A., M.E.I. and O.B.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.A., M.E.I. and A.K.A.; writing—review and editing, A.M.A., M.E.I. and A.A.B.A.; visualization, A.A.B.A.; supervision, M.E.I. and A.A.B.A.; project administration, A.M.A.; funding acquisition, A.M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research and Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project number UB-43-1442.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Research Ethics Local Committee of the College of Medicine, University of Bisha, Saudi Arabia (Ref. no. UBCOM/H-06-BH-087 (05-23) on 29 November 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data of the study are available upon reasonable request. All the data generated or analyzed during the study are included in this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors state that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Moradigaravand, D.; Martin, V.; Peacock, S.J.; Parkhill, J. Evolution and Epidemiology of Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae in the United Kingdom and Ireland. MBio 2017, 8, e01976-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Abdalhamid, B.; Elhadi, N.; Albunayan, S.; Alsamman, K.; Aljindan, R. First Description of Methyltransferases in Extensively Drug-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae Isolates from Saudi Arabia. J. Med. Microbiol. 2017, 66, 859–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Palmeiro, J.K.; De Souza, R.F.; Schörner, M.A.; Passarelli-Araujo, H.; Grazziotin, A.L.; Vidal, N.M.; Venancio, T.M.; Dalla-costa, L.M. Molecular Epidemiology of Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae Isolates in a Brazilian Tertiary Hospital. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Tzouvelekis, L.S.; Markogiannakis, A.; Psichogiou, M.; Tassios, P.T.; Daikos, G.L. Carbapenemases in Klebsiella Pneumoniae and Other Enterobacteriaceae: An Evolving Crisis of Global Dimensions. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 25, 682–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Shibl, A.; Al-agamy, M.; Memish, Z.; Senok, A. The Emergence of OXA-48- and NDM-1-Positive Klebsiella Pneumoniae in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 17, e1130–e1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Memish, Z.A.; Assiri, A.; Almasri, M.; Roshdy, H.; Hathout, H.; Kaase, M.; Gatermann, S.G.; Yezli, S. Molecular Characterization of Carbapenemase Production among Gram-Negative Bacteria in Saudi Arabia. Microb. Drug Resist. 2015, 21, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. uz Zaman, T.; Aldrees, M.; Al Johani, S.M.; Alrodayyan, M.; Aldughashem, F.A.; Balkhy, H.H. Multi-Drug Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae Infection Carrying the OXA-48 Gene and Showing Variations in Outer Membrane Protein 36 Causing an Outbreak in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 28, e186–e192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Khan, M.A.; Mohamed, A.M.; Faiz, A.; Ahmad, J. Enterobacterial Infection in Saudi Arabia: First Record of Klebsiella Pneumoniae with Triple Carbapenemase Genes Resistance. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2019, 13, 334–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. The, H.C.; Karkey, A.; Thanh, D.P.; Boinett, C.J.; Cain, A.K.; Ellington, M.; Baker, K.S.; Dongol, S.; Thompson, C.; Harris, S.R.; et al. A High-Resolution Genomic Analysis of Multidrug- Resistant Hospital Outbreaks of Klebsiella Pneumoniae. EMBO Mol. Med. 2015, 7, 227–239. [Google Scholar]
  10. Alraddadi, B.M.; Heaphy, E.L.G.; Aljishi, Y.; Ahmed, W.; Eljaaly, K.; Al-Turkistani, H.H.; Alshukairi, A.N.; Qutub, M.O.; Alodini, K.; Alosaimi, R.; et al. Molecular Epidemiology and Outcome of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales in Saudi Arabia. BMC Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Candido, L.; Barbosa, G.; Silva, A.; Bordoni, G.P.; Barbosa, G.D.O.; Carneiro, L.C. Elevated Mortality Risk from CRKp Associated with Comorbidities: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 874. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang, H.; Yang, M. Risk Factors and Prognosis of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae Infections in Respiratory Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Study. Infect. Drug Resist. 2021, 14, 3297–3305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 29th ed.; CLSI Suppl. M100; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  14. Magiorakos, A.; Srinivasan, A.; Carey, R.B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M.E.; Giske, C.G.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J.F. Bacteria: An International Expert Proposal for Interim Standard Definitions for Acquired Resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011, 18, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Favier, C.; Arlet, G.; Dallenne, C.; Da Costa, A.; Decre, D.; Curie, M. Development of a Set of Multiplex PCR Assays for the Detection of Genes Encoding Important b-Lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2010, 65, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Ibrahim, M.E.; Magzoub, M.A.; Bilal, N.E.; Hamid, M.E. Distribution of Class I Integrons and Their Effect on the Prevalence of Multi-Drug Resistant Escherichia Coli Clinical Isolates from Sudan. Saudi Med. J. 2013, 34, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Poirel, L.; Walsh, T.R.; Cuvillier, V.; Nordmann, P. Multiplex PCR for Detection of Acquired Carbapenemase Genes. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2011, 70, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Heinz, E.; Brindle, R.; Morgan-Mccalla, A.; Peters, K.; Thomson, N.R. Caribbean Multi-Centre Study of Klebsiella Pneumoniae: Whole-Genome Sequencing, Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Factors. Microb. Genom. 2019, 5, e000266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Radwan, E.; Al-dughmani, H.; Koura, B.; Bader, M.; Al Deen, M.; Bueid, A.; Elgaher, M.; Alghoribi, M.F.; Albarrag, M.; Somily, M. Molecular Characterization of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales in Thirteen Tertiary Care Hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Ann. Saudi Med. 2021, 48, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zowawi, H.M.; Sartor, A.L.; Balkhy, H.H.; Walsh, T.R.; Al Johani, S.M.; AlJindan, R.Y.; Alfaresi, M.; Ibrahim, E.; Al-Jardani, A.; Al-Abri, S.; et al. Molecular Characterization of Carbapenemase-Producing Escherichia Coli and Klebsiella Pneumoniae in the Countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council: Dominance of OXA-48 and NDM Producers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 3085–3090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Al-agamy, M.H.; Aljallal, A.; Radwan, H.H.; Shibl, A.M. Characterization of Carbapenemases, ESBLs, and Plasmid-Mediated Quinolone Determinants in Carbapenem-Insensitive Escherichia Coli and Klebsiella Pneumoniae in Riyadh Hospitals. J. Infect. Public Health 2018, 11, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alsharapy, S.A.; Gharout-Sait, A.; Muggeo, A.; Guillard, T.; Cholley, P.; Brasme, L.; Bertrand, X.; Moghram, G.S.; Touati, A.; De Champs, C. Characterization of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Isolates in Al Thawra University Hospital, Sana’a, Yemen. Microb. Drug Resist. 2019, 26, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jamal, W.; Rotimi, V.; Albert, M.; Khodakhast, F.; Udo, E.; Poirel, L. Emergence of Nosocomial New Delhi Metallo-Beta-Lactamase-1 (NDM-1)-Producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae in Patients Admitted to a Tertiary Care Hospital in Kuwait. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2012, 39, 183–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Poirel, L.; Al Maskari, Z.; Al Rashdi, F.; Bernabeu, S.; Nordmann, P. NDM-1-Producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae Isolated in the Sultanate of Oman. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011, 66, 304–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Shoja, S.; Ansari, M.; Faridi, F.; Azad, M.; Davoodian, P.; Javadpour, S.; Farahani, A.; Mobarrez, B.D.; Karmostaji, A. Identification of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae with Emphasis. Microb. Drug Resist. 2017, 24, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Al-Agamy, M.H.; Shibl, A.M.; Elkhizzi, N.A.; Meunier, D.; Turton, J.F.; Livermore, D.M. Persistence of Klebsiella Pneumoniae Clones with OXA-48 or NDM Carbapenemases Causing Bacteraemias in a Riyadh Hospital. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2013, 76, 214–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ibrahim, M.E.; Algak, T.B.; Abbas, M.; Elamin, B.K. Emergence of BlaTEM, BlaCTX-M, BlaSHV and BlaOXA Genes in Multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter Baumannii in Saudi Arabia. Exp. Ther. Med. 2021, 22, 1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rimoldi, S.G.; Gentile, B.; Pagani, C.; Di Gregorio, A.; Anselmo, A.; Palozzi, A.M.; Fortunato, A.; Pittiglio, V.; Ridolfo, A.L.; Gismondo, M.R. Whole Genome Sequencing for the Molecular Characterization of Carbapenem- Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae Strains Isolated at the Italian ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco Hospital, 2012–2014. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Al-agamy, M.H.; El-mahdy, T.S.; Radwan, H.H.; Poirel, L. Cooccurrence of NDM-1, ESBL, RmtC, AAC(6′)-Ib, and QnrB in Clonally Related Klebsiella Pneumoniae Isolates Together with Coexistence of CMY-4 and AAC(6′)-Ib in Enterobacter Cloacae Isolates from Saudi Arabia. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 6736897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Zheng, S.; Cao, S.; Xu, H.; Feng, D.; Wan, L.; Wang, G.; Xiao, X. Risk Factors, Outcomes and Genotypes of Carbapenem-Nonsusceptible Klebsiella Pneumoniae Bloodstream Infection: A Three-Year Retrospective Study in a Large Tertiary Hospital in Northern China Risk Factors, Outcomes and Genotypes of Carbapenem-Nonsuscept. Infect. Dis. (Auckl.) 2018, 50, 443–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ramsamy, Y.; Mlisana, K.P.; Allam, M.; Amoako, D.G.; Abia, A.L.K.; Ismail, A.; Singh, R.; Kisten, T.; Essack, S.Y. Genomic Analysis of Carbapenemase-Producing Extensively Drug-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae Isolates Reveals the Horizontal Spread of P18-43_01 Plasmid Encoding Bla NDM-1 in South Africa. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Rodr, E.; Garza-Gonza, E.; Bocanegra-Ibarias, P.; Paz-Velarde, B.A.; Morf, R.; Leo, G. A Case–Control Study of Infections Caused by Klebsiella Pneumoniae Producing New Delhi Metallo-Beta-Lactamase-1: Predictors and Outcomes. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 867347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dirar, M.H.; Bilal, N.E.; Ibrahim, M.E.; Hamid, M.E. Prevalence of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL) and Molecular Detection of BlaTEM, BlaSHV and BlaCTX-M Genotypes among Enterobacteriaceae Isolates from Patients in Khartoum, Sudan Maha. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2020, 37, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, Y.; Li, J.; Hu, T.; Hu, J.; Song, N.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y. Five-Year Change of Prevalence and Risk Factors for Infection and Mortality of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae Bloodstream Infection in a Tertiary Hospital in North China. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2020, 9, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Haider, M.H.; Mchugh, T.D.; Roulston, K.; Arruda, L.B.; Sadouki, Z.; Riaz, S. Detection of Carbapenemases and Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase Bla OXA1-Bla SHV-Bla TEM Genes in Gram-Negative Bacterial Isolates from ICU Burns Patients. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2022, 21, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhu, W.; Yuan, Z.; Zhou, H. Risk Factors for Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae Infection Relative to Two Types of Control Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 9, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Results of multiplex PCR amplification of genes in MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae: (A) Lane 1, 2, 4 showed blaOXA-48-like (281 bp) expression; Lane 3, 5, 6, 7 showed negative results. (B) lane 1, 3, 5, 7 showed blaOXA-48-like (281bp) expression; Lane 2, 4, 6 were negative. (C) Lane 3 and 7 showed blaKPC (538 bp) expression; Lane 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 were negative. (D) Lane 4 showed blaNDM-1 (621 bp) expression; Lane 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 were negative.
Figure 1. Results of multiplex PCR amplification of genes in MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae: (A) Lane 1, 2, 4 showed blaOXA-48-like (281 bp) expression; Lane 3, 5, 6, 7 showed negative results. (B) lane 1, 3, 5, 7 showed blaOXA-48-like (281bp) expression; Lane 2, 4, 6 were negative. (C) Lane 3 and 7 showed blaKPC (538 bp) expression; Lane 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 were negative. (D) Lane 4 showed blaNDM-1 (621 bp) expression; Lane 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 were negative.
Antibiotics 11 01697 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of carbapenemase-producing MDR. Klebsiella pneumoniae based on the types of clinical specimens.
Figure 2. Distribution of carbapenemase-producing MDR. Klebsiella pneumoniae based on the types of clinical specimens.
Antibiotics 11 01697 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of carbapenemase-producing MDR. Klebsiella pneumoniae among hospital wards.
Figure 3. Distribution of carbapenemase-producing MDR. Klebsiella pneumoniae among hospital wards.
Antibiotics 11 01697 g003
Table 1. Oligonucleotides used in this study.
Table 1. Oligonucleotides used in this study.
GenePrimersSequenceBand/bpReference
blaNDM-1NDM-F
NDM-R
GGTTTGGCGATCTGGTTTTC
CGGAATGGCTCATCACGATC
621[17]
blaIMPIMP-F
IMP-R
TTGACACTCCATTTACDG
GATYGAGAATTAAGCCACYCT
139[15]
blaVIMVIM-F
VIM-R
GATGGTGTTTGGTCGCATA
CGAATGCGCAGCACCAG
390[15]
blaKPCKPC-F
KPC-R
CATTCAAGGGCTTTCTTGCTGC
ACGACGGCATAGTCATTTGC
538[15]
blaOXA-48-likeOXA-F
OXA-R
GCTTGATCGCCCTCGATT
GATTTGCTCCGTGGCCGAAA
281[15]
Table 2. Antibiotic resistance rates of MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 71) collected from comorbidity patients at different hospital’ wards.
Table 2. Antibiotic resistance rates of MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 71) collected from comorbidity patients at different hospital’ wards.
AgentOverall, n (%) ICU, n (%)Medical, n (%)CCU, n (%) CHDU, n (%) Urology, n (%)
Amikacin43 (60.6)28 (75.7)8 (57.1)2 (28.6)4 (44.4)1 (25)
Ampicillin71 (100)(100)(100)(100)(100)(100)
Amoxicillin/clavulanate54(76.1)33 (89.2)10 (71.4)4 (57.1)5 (55.6)2 (50)
Aztreonam58 (81.7)34 (91.9)12 (85.7)4 (57.1)6 (66.7)2 (50)
Ceftriaxone61 (85.9)36 (97.3)11 (78.6)4 (57.1)7 (77.8)3 (75)
Cefepime57 (80.3)35 (94.6)9 (64.3)4 (57.1)6 (66.7)3 (75)
Cefuroxime64 (90.1)36 (97.3)13 (92.9)5 (71.4)7 (77.8)3 (75)
Ciprofloxacin49 (69)30 (81.1)8 (57.1)4 (57.1)6 (66.7)1 (25)
trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole58 (81.7)32 (86.5)11 (78.6)6 (85.7)6 (66.7)3 (75)
Colistin9 (12.7)9 (24.3)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
Gentamicin45(63.4)29 (78.4)7 (50)3 (42.9)4 (44.4)2 (50)
Imipenem40 (56.3)29 (78.4)4 (28.6)3 (42.9)3 (33.3)1 (25)
Meropenem49 (69)33 (89.2)6 (42.9)2 (28.6)6 (66.7)2 (50)
Piperacillin/tazobactam57 (80.3)35 (94.6)9 (64.3)4 (57.1)6(66.7)3 (75)
Tigecycline4 (5.6)3 (8.1)1 (7.1)0 0.0 (0.0)0 0.0 (0.0)0 0.0 (0.0)
Table 3. Distribution of resistance-gene-carrying Klebsiella pneumoniae among studied patients based on the number of comorbidities.
Table 3. Distribution of resistance-gene-carrying Klebsiella pneumoniae among studied patients based on the number of comorbidities.
ComorbidityNumber of PatientsFrequency of Resistance-Gene-Carrying K. pneumoniae, n (%)
Single2317(73.9)
COPD87 (87.5)
DM74 (57.1)
HTN53 (60)
CVA22 (100)
HD11 (100)
Two2513 (52)
DM, HTN85 (62.5)
DM, CVA40 (0.0)
DM, COPD33 (100)
HTN, COPD33 (100)
HD, CVA31 (33.3)
HTN, CVA200.0
DM, CKD100.0
HTN, CKD11 (100)
Three107 (70)
DM, HTN, CKD43 (75)
DM, HTN, CVA42 (50)
DM, HTN, CVD11 (100)
DM, HTN, HD11 (100)
Four119 (81.8)
DM, HTN, CKD, HD54(80)
DM, HTN, HD, CVA22 (100)
DM, HTN, CKD, COPD11 (100)
DM, HTN, HD, COPD10 (0.0)
DM, HTN, CKD, CVD11 (100)
DM, HTN, CVD, CVA11 (100)
Five21 (50)
DM, HTN, CKD, HD, COPD11 (100)
DM, HTN, CKD, CVD, CVA100.0
CKD, chronic kidney diseases; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; CVD, cardiovascular diseases; DM, diabetes mellitus; HD, heart diseases; HTN, hypertension.
Table 4. Factors associated with the presence of resistance-gene-carrying Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Table 4. Factors associated with the presence of resistance-gene-carrying Klebsiella pneumoniae.
VariableTotaln (%) of Resistant Geneχ2p Value
Gender 5.940.015
Male3830 (78.9)
Female3317 (51.5)
Age group, year 1.7060.426
≤45119 (81.8)
46 to 651611 (68.8)
>654427 (61.4)
ICU admission 7.6490.002
Yes3730 (81.1)
No3417 (50)
Diabetes Mellitus 0.4460.581
Yes4629(63)
No2518 (72)
Hypertension 0.5410.373
Yes4229(69)
No2918 (62.1)
Chronic kidney diseases 0.4330.511
Yes1511 (73.3)
No5636 (64.3)
Heart diseases 0.2130.644
Yes1410 (71.4)
No5737 (64.9)
Cardiovascular diseases 0.1470.702
Yes43 (75)
No6744 (65.7)
Cerebrovascular accident 6.7290.009
Yes198 (42.1)
No5239 (75)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases 4.8510.028
Yes1715 (88.2)
No5432(59.3)
Number of comorbidities 3.4760.176
One2317(73.9)
Two2513 (52)
Three or more2317(73.9)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alshahrani, A.M.; Ibrahim, M.E.; Aldossary, A.K.; Alghamdi, M.A.; Ahmed, O.B.; Bin Abdulhak, A.A. Molecular Epidemiology of Carbapenem-Resistant K. pneumoniae Clinical Isolates from the Adult Patients with Comorbidities in a Tertiary Hospital, Southern Saudi Arabia. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1697. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11121697

AMA Style

Alshahrani AM, Ibrahim ME, Aldossary AK, Alghamdi MA, Ahmed OB, Bin Abdulhak AA. Molecular Epidemiology of Carbapenem-Resistant K. pneumoniae Clinical Isolates from the Adult Patients with Comorbidities in a Tertiary Hospital, Southern Saudi Arabia. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(12):1697. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11121697

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alshahrani, Abdullah M., Mutasim E. Ibrahim, Ahmed K. Aldossary, Mushabab A. Alghamdi, Omar B. Ahmed, and Aref A. Bin Abdulhak. 2022. "Molecular Epidemiology of Carbapenem-Resistant K. pneumoniae Clinical Isolates from the Adult Patients with Comorbidities in a Tertiary Hospital, Southern Saudi Arabia" Antibiotics 11, no. 12: 1697. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11121697

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop