Next Article in Journal
Study of SarA by DNA Affinity Capture Assay (DACA) Employing Three Promoters of Key Virulence and Resistance Genes in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Next Article in Special Issue
New Antibiotics for Staphylococcus aureus Infection: An Update from the World Association of Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders (WAidid) and the Italian Society of Anti-Infective Therapy (SITA)
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical Composition and In Vitro and In Silico Antileishmanial Evaluation of the Essential Oil from Croton linearis Jacq. Stems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phytochemicals in the Prevention and Treatment of SARS-CoV-2—Clinical Evidence
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Sample Error Pre-Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Its Influencing Factors from the Perspective of Hospital Management: A Cross-Sectional Study

Antibiotics 2022, 11(12), 1715; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11121715
by Yuanyang Wu, Qianning Wang, Feiyang Zheng, Tiantian Yu, Yanting Wang, Si Fan and Xinping Zhang *
Reviewer 1:
Antibiotics 2022, 11(12), 1715; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11121715
Submission received: 15 October 2022 / Revised: 7 November 2022 / Accepted: 22 November 2022 / Published: 28 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotics Use in Infection and Public Health)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

It is an interesting article, with emphasis on identifying fhospital management practices impacting sampling errors and affecting antibiotic-susceptibility. tests.  

Under the abstract , on line 17, you introduce a study done by. Anoosheh, in Iran, without. delving into details as to how /why that would be applicable or relevant in China, where the current study has been conducted. 

Lines 32-35:Implementation sample information management, performance appraisal, training and publicity activi ties were important factors in improving the quality of samples valuable for rational use of antibi otic. 

Was there a study done AFTER implementing these measures? 

While the authors describe the study as cross sectional, in the results and in their conclusions, they state : " Information man agement, performance appraisal, training and publicity activities were important factors in improving the quality of samples. "

How did they reach this conclusion based off of their study design?

Was there different times of data collection ( before and after implementation of these ideas) that led the authors to draw their conclusions?

Or is is their supposition, that having identified these factors as the possible causes for sampling error, that it would potentially reduce the errors?

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Editor,

The authors investigated the pre sampling errors and influencing factors. 

The title should contain the study type.

Even though it was explained in detail what is known and what this study adds should be underlined in the introduction section.

The methods and results were quite complicated to understand. The readability should be improved. A clarification should be beneficial for the audience to understand and keep reading the manuscript.

Even though this study investigated the antimicrobial-related subject, it mainly focuses on statistical and analytical investigations. I am hesitant that the journal of antibiotics is the right journal for this article. 

I believe this study is significant enough to publish in the journal of antibiotics after major issues are resolved. The aim and scope of the journal should be evaluated again.

Sincerely yours

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Editor,

 The authors investigated the pre-sampling errors and influencing factors. I would like to thank the authors for considering my suggestion related to their study. I believe after revision this study is significant enough published in antibiotics journal.

Regards,

Back to TopTop