Next Article in Journal
In Silico Docking, Resistance Modulation and Biofilm Gene Expression in Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii via Cinnamic and Gallic Acids
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Catechin Synergistic and Antibacterial Efficacy on Biofilm Formation and acrA Gene Expression of Uropathogenic E. coli Clinical Isolates
Previous Article in Journal
In Vitro Evaluation of Antimicrobial Effect of Phytobiotics Mixture on Salmonella spp. Isolated from Chicken Broiler
Previous Article in Special Issue
The 30-Day Economic Burden of Newly Diagnosed Complicated Urinary Tract Infections in Medicare Fee-for-Service Patients Who Resided in the Community
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 11
Issue 7
10.3390/antibiotics11070869
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Occurrence of Serratia marcescens Carrying blaIMP-26 and mcr-9 in Southern China: New Insights in the Evolution of Megaplasmid IMP-26

by
Yuxia Zhong
1,†,
Wanting Liu
1,†,
Peibo Yuan
1,
Ling Yang
2,
Zhenbo Xu
3,4,5,* and
Dingqiang Chen
1,*
1
Microbiome Medicine Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, China
2
Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China
3
School of Food Science and Engineering, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Green Processing of Natural Products and Product Safety, Engineering Research Center of Starch and Vegetable Protein Processing Ministry of Education, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
4
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
5
Research Institute for Food Nutrition and Human Health, Guangzhou 510640, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antibiotics 2022, 11(7), 869; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070869
Submission received: 26 May 2022 / Revised: 24 June 2022 / Accepted: 25 June 2022 / Published: 28 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Antimicrobial Resistance and Anti-Biofilms)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The spread of multidrug-resistant enterobacteria strains has posed a significant concern in public health, especially when the strain harbors metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL)-encoding and mobilized colistin resistance (mcr) genes as such genetic components potentially mediate multidrug resistance. Here we report an IncHI2/2A plasmid carrying blaIMP-26 and mcr-9 in multidrug-resistant Serratia marcescens human isolates YL4. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by the broth microdilution method. According to the results, S. marcescens YL4 was resistant to several antimicrobials, including β-lactams, fluorquinolones, sulfanilamide, glycylcycline, and aminoglycosides, except for amikacin. To investigate the plasmid further, we conducted whole-genome sequencing and sequence analysis. As shown, S. marcescens YL4 possessed a circular chromosome with 5,171,477 bp length and two plasmids, pYL4.1 (321,744 bp) and pYL4.2 (46,771 bp). Importantly, sharing high similarity with plasmids pZHZJ1 and pIMP-26, pYL4.1 has an IncHI2/2A backbone holding a variable region containing blaIMP-26, mcr-9, and two copies of blaTEM-1B. After comprehensively comparing relevant plasmids, we proposed an evolutionary pathway originating from ancestor pZHZJ1. Then, via an acquisition of the mcr-9 element and a few recombination events, this plasmid eventually evolved into pYL4.1 and pIMP-26 through two different pathways. In addition, the phage-like plasmid pYL4.2 also carried a blaTEM-1B gene. Remarkably, this study first identified a multidrug-resistant S. marcescens strain co-harboring blaIMP-26 and mcr-9 on a megaplasmid pYL4.1 and also included a proposed evolutionary pathway of epidemic megaplasmids carrying blaIMP-26.

1. Introduction

Serratia marcescens is a bacterium of the Enterobacteriaceae family that thrives in damp environments such as water and soil and can survive for months on inanimate surfaces. The bacteria were thought to be nonpathogenic for a long time before the infections caused by this microorganism were confirmed [1]. Its threat to health remained unclear until the outbreak of nosocomial S. marcescens infections in the late 20th century [2,3]. Even though this organism exhibits a wide range of virulence factors and is relatively weak in virulence, it can infect critically ill or immunocompromised patients, as well as infants and newborns [4,5,6]. Researchers have pointed out that this microorganism could cause multiple infections, including meningitis, pneumonia, septicemia, and urinary tract infections, associated with poor clinical outcomes [7,8,9,10]. Due to their capability of adherence to invasive hospital equipment and forming biofilm, nosocomial infections caused by S. marcescens were difficult to treat [11,12]. What is more, these strains were usually resistant to ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, narrow-spectrum cephalosporins, cephamycins, cefuroxime, nitrofurantoin, and colistin according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. The increasing multidrug-resistant S. marcescens in the nosocomial environment has become a major concern. The situation worsens when this species acquires the ability to resist the last-resort antibiotics, such as carbapenems, due to the transfer of resistance genes, for example, blaKPC was reported [13,14,15]. Now, the World Health Organization (WHO) has designated it as a research priority for developing alternative antibacterial strategies.
Beta-Lactam antibiotics have been popular as therapeutic drugs for over 70 years, which has led to an abundance of β-lactam-inactivating β-lactamases. Beta-lactamases, including plasmid-mediated extended-spectrum β-lactamases, AmpC cephalosporinases, and carbapenemases, are now present globally with some variants preferred in particular regions. A significant challenge in modern medicine has been the presence and dissemination of carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae since this hydrolase can decompose penicillins, cephalosporins, monobactams, and carbapenems [16,17]. IMP-26 was first identified and characterized as one kind of metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs) from a Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated in Singapore in 2010 [18]. The protein resembles IMP-4 but differs by one amino acid (Phe49Val). It displayed higher carbapenem hydrolysis activity toward meropenem than IMP-1 [19]. Since then, such MBLs have been reported in a variety of microbes worldwide, including Enterobacteria [20,21], P. aeruginosa [19,22], and Klebsiella pneumoniae [23]. As reported previously, the blaIMP-26 gene was found on various microbial chromosomes; only four articles ever described its location on a plasmid [24,25,26,27].
Colistin is one of the last therapeutic options for infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria [28]. However, a plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene, mcr-1, was first identified in Chinese Escherichia coli isolates in 2016 [29]. In the years following the first description, several reports have described the emergence of mcr-1 to mcr-10 in different host species and geographic locations [30,31,32]. The mcr-9 gene was found in a colistin-exposed Salmonella Typhimurium in 2019 [33]. It shared 65% and 63% amino acid identities with the closest relatives, MCR-3 and MCR-7, and between 33% and 45% with the other MCRs. Since then, the mcr-9 gene has been identified in 40 countries across six continents [34]. These genes encode phosphoethanolamine transferase enzymes responsible for adding phosphoethanolamine to lipid A, which leads to a diminished affinity for colistin and antibiotic resistance [31].
Mobile elements are common in prokaryotic genomes and crucial for the evolution of plasmids and bacteria [35]. Typically, the evolution of a plasmid driven by transposons or IS elements usually results in structural changes through homologous recombination [36]. Porse et al. discovered that IS26 mediated a large-scale deletion of a plasmid’s conjugation machinery, leading to a reduction in the plasmid fitness cost in E. coli hosts, improving the plasmid–host adaptation [37]. IS26 disseminated antibiotic resistance genes in two distinct ways which differ from other non-IS6 family members, disseminating antibiotic resistance genes in two specific ways. The first way is achieved through an IS26-flanked structure creating a cointegrate formation with duplication of the IS26 and generation of a target duplication. The second way is forming a non-replicating circular intermediate containing a single IS26 named a translocatable unit (TU). The IS26 in TU targets an existing copy of IS26 on the receptor’s sequence and adjacent to it without increasing the number of IS26 copies or making a further duplication of the target [38,39]. Another noteworthy mobile element was Tn3 [40]. Tn3 transposons are a big and widespread transposon family allowing assembly, diversification, and redistribution of antimicrobial resistance genes, contributing to the transport of bacterial resistance genes among bacteria. They transpose in a “copy-and-paste” way in which the donor and target molecules are fused by repeated transposon copies [41].
Here, we characterized an IncHI2/2A plasmid harboring blaIMP-26 and mcr-9 in a multidrug-resistant S. marcescens which displayed resistance to carbapenems and further studied the evolutionary pathway of such epidemic megaplasmids carrying blaIMP-26 mediated by IS26 and Tn3.

2. Results

2.1. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles

MICs obtained by the broth micro-dilution method are shown in Table 1. The isolate was susceptible only to amikacin according to CLSI breakpoints of 2021 (Table 1).

2.2. Genome Sequencing of S. marcescens YL4

S. marcescens YL4 possessed a circular chromosome with 5,171,477 bp and two plasmids (pYL4.1 and pYL4.2) with 316,459 bp and 46,771 bp, respectively. The GC content of chromosomes and plasmids was 59.30%, 47.64%, and 53.11%. On the YL4’s chromosome, 88 tRNA, 22 rRNA, 38 sRNA, and 4762 open reading frames were annotated using the Prokaryotic Genomes Annotation Pipeline server. In addition, 2 prophages, 1 CRISPR array, and 27 insertion elements were detected on the chromosome. ResFinder server analysis showed that the YL4 strain chromosome contains three resistance genes, including one beta-lactam resistance gene (blaSRT-1), aminoglycoside resistance gene (aac(6′)-Ic), and Tetracycline resistance gene (tet(41)) (Table 2).

2.3. Characteristics of the IncHI2/2A Plasmid pYL4.1

The IncHI2/2A plasmid pYL4.1’s DNA sequence comprises 316,459 bp with a G+C content of 47.64%. There are two replicons on the plasmid. One was 876 bp (291,621..292,496) in size; the other was 1056 bp (227,123..278,178) in length. BLAST search showed the backbone regions of pYL4 similar to pIMP-26 (Genbank ID: MH399264) [25], pEHZJ1 (Genbank ID: CP033103) [26], pEC-IMPQ (Genbank ID: EU855788) [42], pGMI14-002 (Genbank ID: CP028197), and p505108-MDR (Genbank ID: KY978628) (Figure 1).

2.4. Gene Environments of blaIMP-26

The genetic environment of blaIMP-26 reveals that it was partitioned into the class 1 integron cassette, sequentially arranged as sul1-qacEΔ1-ItrA-blaIMP-26-Int1. It contained a 5′-conserved segment (5′-CS) adjacent to IS6100, InsB, ISVsa5, fosA5, Tn3, blaTEM-1B, Tn3, and the 3′-CS was abutted to drfA19, mobile elements (IS26, couple of ISEc63, Tn2, the last two belong to Tn3 family), blaTEM-1B. The surrounding of blaIMP-26 in pYL4.1 was similar to but opposite to that of pEHZJ1 from E. hormaechei ST1103 in Zhejiang (accession: CP033103) and pIMP26 from E. cloacae RJ702 in Shanghai (accession: MH399264). The three highly similar plasmids share most genetic structures outside the class 1 integron cassette, for example, insertion elements (IS26, ISEc63, IS4, IS1, Tn3) and resistance genes (fosA5, blaTEM-1B). Two Tn2 transposons flank the multiple resistant regions, one on either end, and could be combined to create a composite transposon capable of moving as a single unit. Additionally, the Tn3 family transposon at the 5′-CS of pEHZJ1 was ISEc63, a transposon of the Tn3 family, but not Tn2. Moreover, we found a blaIMP-26 containing plasmid pIMP1572 from K. pneumoniae KP-1572 (accession: MH464586) which differed from pYL4.1. The two plasmids only share the class 1 integron cassette region, and they do not share the other resistance genes and other elements. Importantly, although there is more or less a difference between the four plasmids, the blaIMP-26 is always located in the class 1 integron cassette, IntI1-blaIMP-26-ORF1-qacE△1-sul1, which consists of a complete 5′-conserved sequence (5′-CS, integrase intl1) and 3′-CS (qacE△1-sul1). It infers that class 1 integron may be significant for the transmission of blaIMP-26 between plasmids (Figure 2).

2.5. Gene Environments of Mcr-9

We compared three mcr-9 harboring plasmids reported in the last two years with our target plasmids. The four plasmids were pIMP-26 from Enterobacter cloacae, p1575-1 from E. hormaechei (accession: CP068288) [43], pEC3 from E. coli (accession: MW509820) [44], and pK714029-2 from K. pneumoniae (accession: CP073658) [45]. Comparing mcr-9-possessing regions among pYL4.1, pIMP-26, and p1575-1 revealed that they shared the same areas flanked by two mobile elements (from ISCNY to InsB) with 100% coverage and 98.88% identity. In all five plasmids, the upstream sequences of mcr-9 were highly homologous, except for pK710429.2, which contained an insertion of the InsB. The structure of rcnR-rcnA-pcoE-pcoS-IS903-mcr-9-wbuC is present on all four plasmids, providing further evidence that these core elements perform a significant role in the conjugation and recombination processes of mcr-9. There are some unique sequences evident in the downstream line. Regulatory genes qseC and qseB, crucial to colistin resistance induction, were typically absent among the four observed plasmids, excluding pEC (Figure 3). However, the mcr-9 gene expression did not increase after pretreatment with colistin in qseC-qseB carrying pEC [44]. In contrast, up-regulation of the mcr-9 gene following colistin treatment was observed in pK714029-2 [45], the plasmid lacking qseC-qseB. The evidence suggests that the effect of qseC-qseB on mcr-9 induction might differ among isolates with diverse genetic backgrounds [46]. Some additional genes may play a prominent role in mcr-9 stimulation [34,47]. Further studies will be necessary to verify whether the qseC-qseB module or the other genes are essential for mcr-9 induction.

2.6. Evolutionary Pathway of Megaplasmids IMP-26

We compared pYL4.1’s whole sequence to the two most similar plasmids, pIMP-26 with 95% query coverage and 99.99% nucleotide identity and pEHZJ1 with 79% query coverage and 99.99% nucleotide identity. After a comprehensive comparison with all megaplasmids with blaIMP-26, the evolutionary path was hypothesized as below (Figure 4). For the pEHZJ1-derived module, a deletion of a 54 kb region followed by the acquisition of the mcr-9 harboring multi-resistant region (MRR) and another acquisition of the IntI1 area that occurred in pEHZJ1 generated a hypothetical module A plasmid. In the second step, a 179 kb MRR flanked by IS26 and Tn3 on module A reversed and developed a critical theoretical module B, from which pYL4 and pIMP-26 evolved in different pathways. A series of restructuring events occurred in the evolution from module B to pYL4.1. First, an IS26 flanking MRR shear from module B formed a circle by connecting IS26 on each end of the fragment. Second, deletion of a class 1 integron also flanked by IS26 was conducted, creating a new component. Next, this fragment was reinserted between Tn3 and IS26, located downstream of module B. The recombination was followed by a reversion of the blaIMP-26 harboring region backed by Tn3. In contrast, another evolutionary pathway from module B to pIMP-26 was simple, with a 13 kb hypothetical protein deletion behind IS5 on the tail of module B and evolving into pIMP-26.

2.7. A Phage-Like Plasmid pYL4.2 Carrying blaTEM-1B

Interestingly, the S. marcescens YL4 harbors another small plasmid, pYL4.2, a phage-like plasmid containing a large proportion of phage-related sequences, 46,771 bp in the plasmid sequence, with a 53.10% GC content. A fragment of ~8 kb in the plasmid was identified as the genome sequence of S. marcescens strain CBS12 isolated from contaminated platelet concentrates obtained from a Canadian donor. No more fragments are found similar to pYL4.2. Plasmid pYL4.2 belongs to the IncFII group and contains 74 ORFs. Noteworthy, the pYL4.2 genome encodes 47 proteins related to phages, such as coat protein, tail fiber protein, portal protein, terminator, outer membrane lytic protein, and others (Table 1). It suggests that pYL4.2 is a phage-like plasmid that carries many phage-like elements. A beta-lactamase encoding gene, blaTEM-1B, was identified on the pYL4.2, located downstream of a complete transposon Tn3 and the insertion elements IS26. No additional antibiotic resistance genes were found in pYL4.2 (Figure 5).

3. Discussion

S. marcescens is an opportunistic nosocomial pathogen and is intrinsically multidrug resistant, mainly due to the presence of a large number of efflux pump genes [48,49], with the ability to produce myriad extracellular enzymes as well as metabolites which make it capable of adapting to both hostile and changing environments [50,51,52]. In S. marcescens, the PhoPQ system can regulate the expression of the arn operon by sensing polymyxin B (PB) and Mg2+, which results in the LPS being modified and leads to PB resistance [53,54]. Another important feature of S. marcescens is that pathogens can acquire antibiotic resistance genes from the surroundings rapidly, mainly due to the acquisition of plasmids and resistance genes [52], for example, blaKPC, as reported [13,14,15].
Here, we found the S. marcescens isolate YL4 possessed three drug-resistance genes on the chromosome, including beta-lactam resistance gene (blaSRT-1), aminoglycoside resistance gene (aac(6′)-Ic), and tetracycline resistance gene (tet(41)), together with two plasmids harboring a resistance gene. In addition, we found a plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene, mcr-9, from a plasmid captured by the YL4 strain. This gene encodes a phosphoethanolamine transferase, contributing to narrowing the negative charge of the outer membrane of bacteria, and attenuates the affinity for colistin via the phosphoethanolamine incorporation into lipid A’s phosphate group, which results in colistin resistance [31]. It was suspected that mcr-9 gene entered the S. marcescens YL4 by plasmid transfer, which is unnecessary for the survival of S. marcescens, bacteria intrinsically resistant to colistin [52]. The phenomenon portends a worrying prospect that the mcr-9 gene may induce colistin resistance in other non-colistin resistant bacteria by horizontal gene transfer as reported [45].
pYL4.1 is a megaplasmid, which belongs to IncHI2/2A plasmid. The entire gene analysis revealed that the plasmid pYL4.1 was a close match to two blaIMP-26 harboring plasmids, pIMP-26 from E. cloacae RJ702 in Shanghai (accession: MH399264) [25] and pEHZJ1 from E. hormaeechei in Zhejiang (accession: CP033103) [26] reported before. An evolutionary path from pEHZJ1 to pYL4.1 or from pEHZJ1 to pIMP-26 was hypothesized. We assumed an IS26-flanked MRR experienced a process with shear, circulation, deletion, and insertion from module B to pYL4.1. This hypothesis is built on the theory posted by Harmer CJ et al. IS26 transmits drug-resistance genes in two distinct forms, a couple of IS26s flanked cointegrate formation or single IS26 containing a translocatable unit (TU) [38]. Past reports have confirmed that IS26 is associated with the transfer of antibiotic resistance genes for its capability of forming translatable units. The translatable unit can be excised from the chromosome and reinserted into it. As a result, a tandem array is created and the number of copies of the resistant gene increases, which does not involve any fitness cost but does increase resistance to drugs [55,56]. Other deletions and reversion are closely related to IS26 and another mobile element, Tn3, a transposon using a “copy-and-paste” mechanism to transfer gene fragments [41]. It is speculated that IS26 and Tn3 participation in the plasmid reorganization from clinical strains are likely to promote the spread of resistance genes among S. marcescens and other Enterobacterales.
Furthermore, the genetic content of blaIMP-26 was analyzed, and the results show that the blaIMP-26 was closely followed by IntI1. The blaIMP-26 harboring a class 1 integron cassette, sequentially arranged as sul1-qacEΔ1-ItrA-blaIMP-26-Int1, were identical to the other three plasmids reported before (pEHZJ1 from E. hormaechei ST1103 (accession: CP033103) [26], pIMP-26 from E. cloacae RJ702 (accession: MH399264) [25], pIMP1572 from K. pneumoniae KP-1572 (accession: MH464586)) [27]. It suggests that the transmission of blaIMP-26 between plasmids may be mediated by and dependent on a class 1 integron, a mobile genetic component responsible for the transmission of multiple drug resistance [57]. These elements are capable of capturing, mobilizing, and integrating antibiotic-resistant gene cassettes [58]. Through lateral DNA transfer, they gained access to a variety of commensal and pathogenic bacteria and subsequently accumulate diverse antibiotic resistance genes [59,60]. The blaIMP-26 transfer mediated by class 1 integron might lead to the increase in carbapenem-resistant isolates, which are a risk to healthcare systems.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial Strain and Clinical Data

A 66-year-old female was hospitalized with pneumonia in Guangzhou, China, in February 2021. An injury to the central nervous system (CNS), type II respiratory failure, and type II diabetes were observed in the patient. S. marcescens was isolated from sputum samples collected during this patient’s hospitalization.

4.2. Bacterial Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Antimicrobial susceptibility tests and biochemical identifications were performed using the Vitek 2 Compact system. The MIC values were determined using the broth micro-dilution methods. Results were interpreted according to guidelines set by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) in 2021. The S. marcescens strain YL4 was used for further determinant analysis and antimicrobial element testing.

4.3. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Bioinformatics Analysis

According to the manufacturer’s instructions, genomic DNA was extracted using HiPure Bacterial DNA Kits (Magen, Guangzhou, China). Our libraries were constructed from a 350 bp small fragment genomic DNA library and a 10 kb fragment library. Genomic sequencing was performed using the Illumina Novaseq 6000 and Pacific Biosciences Sequel platforms (Guangzhou Gene Denovo Bioinformatics Technology Company, Guangzhou, China) to obtain short-read data and long-read data, respectively. Hybrid assembly was performed using Falcon (version 0.3.0) for long-read de novo assembly. The filtered short reads were utilized to correct the genome sequences to improve the quality of the assembly and determine the final genome sequences using Pilon (version 1.23). Genomic sequences were annotated using RAST 2.0 (http://rast.nmpdr.org/, accessed on 4 November 2021) and BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 4 November 2021) to confirm the annotation results. PlasmidFinder was used to identify the plasmid (https://cge.food.dtu.dk/services/PlasmidFinder, accessed on 4 November 2021). ISFinder (https://www-is.biotoul.fr, accessed on 4 November 2021) and ResFinder (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ResFinder, accessed on 4 November 2021) were used to identify resistance genes and insertion elements. Prophages were predicted by PHASTER (http://phaster.ca/, accessed on 15 November 2021). Plasmid sequence alignment to the GenBank database was performed using BLASTn (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 4 November 2021).

4.4. GenBank Accession Numbers

The complete genome sequence of S. marcescens YL4 was submitted to GenBank under the accession number CP083754 (chromosome of S. marcescens YL4 strain), CP083755 (Plasmid pYL4.1), CP083756 (Phage like plasmid pYL4.2).

5. Conclusions

In summary, we first identified an IncHI2/2A plasmid carrying blaIMP-26 and mcr-9 in a multidrug-resistant Serratia marcescens human isolate. After comprehensively comparing this plasmid and other relevant similar plasmids, we proposed an evolutionary pathway originating from ancestor pZHZJ1, including the acquisition of the mcr-9 element and a few recombination events mediated by mobile factors, which resulted in the capture and loss of some drug-resistance genes. As widely known, mobile genetic elements play a crucial part in the transmission of antibiotic resistance genes between plasmids or between plasmids and strains’ chromosomes. Focusing on the evolutionary pathways between structurally similar plasmids is necessary in order to fully understand how multidrug-resistant plasmids evolve and move through microbial populations in diverse settings.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.C. and Z.X.; methodology, Y.Z., W.L., L.Y. and P.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z. and W.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z. and W.L.; funding acquisition, D.C. and Z.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the research grants from the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81974318), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2018A030310170 and 2018A030313279), Guangdong Province Science and Technology Innovation Strategy Special Fund (No. 2019B020209001), Guangdong International S&T Cooperation Programme (2021A0505030007), and the 111 Project (B17018).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The complete genome sequence of S. marcescens YL4 was submitted to GenBank under the accession numbers CP083754 (chromosome of S. marcescens YL4 strain), CP083755 (Plasmid pYL4.1), CP083756 (Phage like plasmid pYL4.2).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hejazi, A.; Falkiner, F.R. Serratia marcescens. J. Med. Microbiol. 1997, 46, 903–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Fleisch, F.; Zimmermann-Baer, U.; Zbinden, R.; Bischoff, G.; Arlettaz, R.; Waldvogel, K.; Nadal, D.; Ruef, C. Three consecutive outbreaks of Serratia marcescens in a neonatal intensive care unit. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2002, 34, 767–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Al Jarousha, A.M.; El Qouqa, I.A.; El Jadba, A.H.; Al Afifi, A.S. An outbreak of Serratia marcescens septicaemia in neonatal intensive care unit in Gaza City, Palestine. J. Hosp. Infect. 2008, 70, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Daoudi, A.; Benaoui, F.; El Idrissi Slitine, N.; Soraa, N.; Rabou Maoulainine, F.M. An Outbreak of Serratia marcescens in a Moroccan Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Adv. Med. 2018, 2018, 4867134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Cristina, M.L.; Sartini, M.; Spagnolo, A.M. Serratia marcescens Infections in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Redondo-Bravo, L.; Gutiérrez-González, E.; San Juan-Sanz, I.; Fernández-Jiménez, I.; Ruiz-Carrascoso, G.; Gallego-Lombardo, S.; Sánchez-García, L.; Elorza-Fernández, D.; Pellicer-Martínez, A.; Omeñaca, F.; et al. Serratia marcescens outbreak in a neonatology unit of a Spanish tertiary hospital: Risk factors and control measures. Am. J. Infect. Control. 2019, 47, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. da Silva, K.E.; Rossato, L.; Jorge, S.; de Oliveira, N.R.; Kremer, F.S.; Campos, V.F.; da Silva Pinto, L.; Dellagostin, O.A.; Simionatto, S. Three challenging cases of infections by multidrug-resistant Serratia marcescens in patients admitted to intensive care units. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2021, 52, 1341–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bes, T.; Nagano, D.; Martins, R.; Marchi, A.P.; Perdigao-Neto, L.; Higashino, H.; Prado, G.; Guimaraes, T.; Levin, A.S.; Costa, S. Bloodstream Infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae and Serratia marcescens isolates co-harboring NDM-1 and KPC-2. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2021, 20, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Stewart, A.G.; Paterson, D.L.; Young, B.; Lye, D.C.; Davis, J.S.; Schneider, K.; Yilmaz, M.; Dinleyici, R.; Runnegar, N.; Henderson, A.; et al. Meropenem Versus Piperacillin-Tazobactam for Definitive Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Caused by AmpC beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacter spp, Citrobacter freundii, Morganella morganii, Providencia spp, or Serratia marcescens: A Pilot Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (MERINO-2). Open Forum. Infect. Dis. 2021, 8, ofab387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Madide, A.; Smith, J. Intracranial complications of Serratia marcescens infection in neonates. S. Afr. Med. J. 2016, 106, 36–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Rodrigues, A.P.; Holanda, A.R.; Lustosa, G.P.; Nóbrega, S.M.; Santana, W.J.; Souza, L.B.; Coutinho, H.D. Virulence factors and resistance mechanisms of Serratia marcescens. A short review. Acta Microbiol. Immunol. Hung. 2006, 53, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Merkier, A.K.; Rodriguez, M.C.; Togneri, A.; Brengi, S.; Osuna, C.; Pichel, M.; Cassini, M.H.; Serratia marcescens Argentinean Collaborative, G.; Centron, D. Outbreak of a cluster with epidemic behavior due to Serratia marcescens after colistin administration in a hospital setting. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 2295–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Huang, X.; Shen, S.; Shi, Q.; Ding, L.; Wu, S.; Han, R.; Zhou, X.; Yu, H.; Hu, F. First Report of bla IMP-4 and bla SRT-2 Coproducing Serratia marcescens Clinical Isolate in China. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 743312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ferreira, R.L.; Rezende, G.S.; Damas, M.S.F.; Oliveira-Silva, M.; Pitondo-Silva, A.; Brito, M.C.A.; Leonardecz, E.; de Goes, F.R.; Campanini, E.B.; Malavazi, I.; et al. Characterization of KPC-Producing Serratia marcescens in an Intensive Care Unit of a Brazilian Tertiary Hospital. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Batah, R.; Loucif, L.; Olaitan, A.O.; Boutefnouchet, N.; Allag, H.; Rolain, J.M. Outbreak of Serratia marcescens Coproducing ArmA and CTX-M-15 Mediated High Levels of Resistance to Aminoglycoside and Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases, Algeria. Microb. Drug Resist. 2015, 21, 470–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Queenan, A.M.; Bush, K. Carbapenemases: The versatile beta-lactamases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 20, 440–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Sawa, T.; Kooguchi, K.; Moriyama, K. Molecular diversity of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and carbapenemases, and antimicrobial resistance. J. Intensive Care 2020, 8, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Koh, T.H.; Khoo, C.T.; Tan, T.T.; Arshad, M.A.; Ang, L.P.; Lau, L.J.; Hsu, L.Y.; Ooi, E.E. Multilocus sequence types of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Singapore carrying metallo-beta-lactamase genes, including the novel bla(IMP-26) gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 2563–2564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Tada, T.; Nhung, P.H.; Miyoshi-Akiyama, T.; Shimada, K.; Tsuchiya, M.; Phuong, D.M.; Anh, N.Q.; Ohmagari, N.; Kirikae, T. Multidrug-Resistant Sequence Type 235 Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolates Producing IMP-26 with Increased Carbapenem-Hydrolyzing Activities in Vietnam. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 6853–6858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Xia, Y.; Liang, Z.; Su, X.; Xiong, Y. Characterization of carbapenemase genes in Enterobacteriaceae species exhibiting decreased susceptibility to carbapenems in a university hospital in Chongqing, China. Ann. Lab. Med. 2012, 32, 270–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Beyrouthy, R.; Barets, M.; Marion, E.; Dananché, C.; Dauwalder, O.; Robin, F.; Gauthier, L.; Jousset, A.; Dortet, L.; Guérin, F.; et al. Novel Enterobacter Lineage as Leading Cause of Nosocomial Outbreak Involving Carbapenemase-Producing Strains. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2018, 24, 1505–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Kim, M.J.; Bae, I.K.; Jeong, S.H.; Kim, S.H.; Song, J.H.; Choi, J.Y.; Yoon, S.S.; Thamlikitkul, V.; Hsueh, P.R.; Yasin, R.M.; et al. Dissemination of metallo-β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa of sequence type 235 in Asian countries. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2013, 68, 2820–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Lascols, C.; Peirano, G.; Hackel, M.; Laupland, K.B.; Pitout, J.D. Surveillance and molecular epidemiology of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates that produce carbapenemases: First report of OXA-48-like enzymes in North America. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Matsumura, Y.; Peirano, G.; Bradford, P.A.; Motyl, M.R.; DeVinney, R.; Pitout, J.D.D. Genomic characterization of IMP and VIM carbapenemase-encoding transferable plasmids of Enterobacteriaceae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 3034–3038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, S.; Zhou, K.; Xiao, S.; Xie, L.; Gu, F.; Li, X.; Ni, Y.; Sun, J.; Han, L. A Multidrug Resistance Plasmid pIMP26, Carrying blaIMP-26, fosA5, blaDHA-1, and qnrB4 in Enterobacter cloacae. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Gou, J.J.; Liu, N.; Guo, L.H.; Xu, H.; Lv, T.; Yu, X.; Chen, Y.B.; Guo, X.B.; Rao, Y.T.; Zheng, B.W. Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacter hormaechei ST1103 with IMP-26 Carbapenemase and ESBL Gene bla (SHV-178). Infect. Drug Resist. 2020, 13, 597–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Yao, H.; Cheng, J.; Li, A.; Yu, R.; Zhao, W.; Qin, S.; Du, X.D. Molecular Characterization of an IncFII(k) Plasmid Co-harboring bla (IMP-26) and tet(A) Variant in a Clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolate. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gogry, F.A.; Siddiqui, M.T.; Sultan, I.; Haq, Q.M.R. Current Update on Intrinsic and Acquired Colistin Resistance Mechanisms in Bacteria. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 677720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, Y.Y.; Wang, Y.; Walsh, T.R.; Yi, L.X.; Zhang, R.; Spencer, J.; Doi, Y.; Tian, G.; Dong, B.; Huang, X.; et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: A microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ling, Z.; Yin, W.; Shen, Z.; Wang, Y.; Shen, J.; Walsh, T.R. Epidemiology of mobile colistin resistance genes mcr-1 to mcr-9. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 3087–3095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sun, J.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Y.-H.; Feng, Y. Towards Understanding MCR-like Colistin Resistance. Trends Microbiol. 2018, 26, 794–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wang, C.; Feng, Y.; Liu, L.; Wei, L.; Kang, M.; Zong, Z. Identification of novel mobile colistin resistance gene mcr-10. Emerg. Microbes. Infect. 2020, 9, 508–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Carroll, L.M.; Gaballa, A.; Guldimann, C.; Sullivan, G.; Henderson, L.O.; Wiedmann, M. Identification of Novel Mobilized Colistin Resistance Gene mcr-9 in a Multidrug-Resistant, Colistin-Susceptible Salmonella enterica Serotype Typhimurium Isolate. mBio 2019, 10, e00853-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Li, Y.; Dai, X.; Zeng, J.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, L. Characterization of the global distribution and diversified plasmid reservoirs of the colistin resistance gene mcr-9. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 8113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Romaniuk, K.; Golec, P.; Dziewit, L. Insight Into the Diversity and Possible Role of Plasmids in the Adaptation of Psychrotolerant and Metalotolerant Arthrobacter spp. to Extreme Antarctic Environments. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 3144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wein, T.; Dagan, T. Plasmid evolution. Curr. Biol. 2020, 30, R1158–R1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Porse, A.; Schønning, K.; Munck, C.; Sommer, M.O. Survival and Evolution of a Large Multidrug Resistance Plasmid in New Clinical Bacterial Hosts. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 2860–2873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Harmer, C.J.; Moran, R.A.; Hall, R.M. Movement of IS26-associated antibiotic resistance genes occurs via a translocatable unit that includes a single IS26 and preferentially inserts adjacent to another IS26. mBio 2014, 5, e01801–e01814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Harmer, C.J.; Hall, R.M. Targeted conservative formation of cointegrates between two DNA molecules containing IS26 occurs via strand exchange at either IS end. Mol. Microbiol. 2017, 106, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Szuplewska, M.; Czarnecki, J.; Bartosik, D. Autonomous and non-autonomous Tn3-family transposons and their role in the evolution of mobile genetic elements. Mob. Genet. Elem. 2014, 4, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Nicolas, E.; Lambin, M.; Dandoy, D.; Galloy, C.; Nguyen, N.; Oger, C.A.; Hallet, B. The Tn3-family of Replicative Transposons. Microbiol. Spectr. 2015, 3, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Chen, Y.T.; Liao, T.L.; Liu, Y.M.; Lauderdale, T.L.; Yan, J.J.; Tsai, S.F. Mobilization of qnrB2 and ISCR1 in plasmids. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 1235–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Ai, W.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, B.; Zhan, Q.; Hu, L.; Xu, Y.; Guo, Y.; Wang, L.; Yu, F.; Li, X. First Report of Coexistence of bla (SFO-1) and bla (NDM-1) β-Lactamase Genes as Well as Colistin Resistance Gene mcr-9 in a Transferrable Plasmid of a Clinical Isolate of Enterobacter hormaechei. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 676113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Simoni, S.; Mingoia, M.; Brenciani, A.; Carelli, M.; Lleò, M.M.; Malerba, G.; Vignaroli, C. First IncHI2 Plasmid Carrying mcr-9.1, bla(VIM-1), and Double Copies of bla(KPC-3) in a Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli Human Isolate. mSphere 2021, 6, e0030221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Liu, Z.; Hang, X.; Xiao, X.; Chu, W.; Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Li, X.; Zhou, Q.; Li, J. Co-occurrence of bla (NDM-1) and mcr-9 in a Conjugative IncHI2/HI2A Plasmid From a Bloodstream Infection-Causing Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 756201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Tyson, G.H.; Li, C.; Hsu, C.H.; Ayers, S.; Borenstein, S.; Mukherjee, S.; Tran, T.T.; McDermott, P.F.; Zhao, S. The mcr-9 Gene of Salmonella and Escherichia coli Is Not Associated with Colistin Resistance in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e00573-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chavda, K.D.; Westblade, L.F.; Satlin, M.J.; Hemmert, A.C.; Castanheira, M.; Jenkins, S.G.; Chen, L.; Kreiswirth, B.N. First Report of bla (VIM-4)- and mcr-9-Coharboring Enterobacter Species Isolated from a Pediatric Patient. mSphere 2019, 4, e00629-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Shirshikova, T.V.; Sierra-Bakhshi, C.G.; Kamaletdinova, L.K.; Matrosova, L.E.; Khabipova, N.N.; Evtugyn, V.G.; Khilyas, I.V.; Danilova, I.V.; Mardanova, A.M.; Sharipova, M.R.; et al. The ABC-Type Efflux Pump MacAB Is Involved in Protection of Serratia marcescens against Aminoglycoside Antibiotics, Polymyxins, and Oxidative Stress. mSphere 2021, 6, e00033-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dalvi, S.D.; Worobec, E.A. Gene expression analysis of the SdeAB multidrug efflux pump in antibiotic-resistant clinical isolates of Serratia marcescens. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 2012, 30, 302–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sandner-Miranda, L.; Vinuesa, P.; Cravioto, A.; Morales-Espinosa, R. The Genomic Basis of Intrinsic and Acquired Antibiotic Resistance in the Genus Serratia. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Soo, P.C.; Wei, J.R.; Horng, Y.T.; Hsieh, S.C.; Ho, S.W.; Lai, H.C. Characterization of the dapA-nlpB genetic locus involved in regulation of swarming motility, cell envelope architecture, hemolysin production, and cell attachment ability in Serratia marcescens. Infect. Immun. 2005, 73, 6075–6084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Mahlen, S.D. Serratia infections: From military experiments to current practice. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 24, 755–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Lin, Q.Y.; Tsai, Y.L.; Liu, M.C.; Lin, W.C.; Hsueh, P.R.; Liaw, S.J. Serratia marcescens arn, a PhoP-regulated locus necessary for polymyxin B resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 5181–5190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Mariscotti, J.F.; Garcia Vescovi, E. Serratia marcescens RamA Expression Is under PhoP-Dependent Control and Modulates Lipid A-Related Gene Transcription and Antibiotic Resistance Phenotypes. J. Bacteriol. 2021, 203, e0052320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Hubbard, A.T.M.; Mason, J.; Roberts, P.; Parry, C.M.; Corless, C.; van Aartsen, J.; Howard, A.; Bulgasim, I.; Fraser, A.J.; Adams, E.R.; et al. Piperacillin/tazobactam resistance in a clinical isolate of Escherichia coli due to IS26-mediated amplification of blaTEM-1B. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Hansen, K.H.; Andreasen, M.R.; Pedersen, M.S.; Westh, H.; Jelsbak, L.; Schønning, K. Resistance to piperacillin/tazobactam in Escherichia coli resulting from extensive IS26-associated gene amplification of blaTEM-1. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 74, 3179–3183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Mazel, D. Integrons: Agents of bacterial evolution. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 4, 608–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Harms, K.; Starikova, I.; Johnsen, P.J. Costly Class-1 integrons and the domestication of the the functional integrase. Mob. Genet. Elem. 2013, 3, e24774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Karimi Dehkordi, M.; Halaji, M.; Nouri, S. Prevalence of class 1 integron in Escherichia coli isolated from animal sources in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trop. Med. Health 2020, 48, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, W.; Ma, J.; Sun, X.; Liu, M.; Wang, H. Antimicrobial Resistance and Molecular Characterization of Gene Cassettes from Class 1 Integrons in Escherichia coli Strains. Microb. Drug Resist. 2022, 28, 413–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antibiotics 11 00869 g001 550
Figure 1. Genetic features of the pYL4.1 plasmid. Inner and outer circles correspond to average G+C content (black circle) and GC skew information (green and purple circles, respectively). The colored circles represent different plasmids (details are in the legend), and the Genbank numbers are as follows: pIMP26 (MH399264), pEHZJ1 (CP033103), pEC-IMPQ (EU855788), pGMI14-002 (CP028197), p505108-MDR (KY978628). An outer cyan-blue circle shows where resistance genes and IntI are located. The location of the resistance genes (magenta), insert elements (blue), and replication origins (orange) are also shown outside the round and tagged by different colors.
Figure 1. Genetic features of the pYL4.1 plasmid. Inner and outer circles correspond to average G+C content (black circle) and GC skew information (green and purple circles, respectively). The colored circles represent different plasmids (details are in the legend), and the Genbank numbers are as follows: pIMP26 (MH399264), pEHZJ1 (CP033103), pEC-IMPQ (EU855788), pGMI14-002 (CP028197), p505108-MDR (KY978628). An outer cyan-blue circle shows where resistance genes and IntI are located. The location of the resistance genes (magenta), insert elements (blue), and replication origins (orange) are also shown outside the round and tagged by different colors.
Antibiotics 11 00869 g001
Antibiotics 11 00869 g002 550
Figure 2. Genetic content of blaIMP-26. Comparison of the genetic environment of blaIMP-26 between different plasmids. Magenta arrows indicate resistance genes, and blue arrows indicate insertion sequences. Shading regions denote homologous regions (>95% nucleotide identity).
Figure 2. Genetic content of blaIMP-26. Comparison of the genetic environment of blaIMP-26 between different plasmids. Magenta arrows indicate resistance genes, and blue arrows indicate insertion sequences. Shading regions denote homologous regions (>95% nucleotide identity).
Antibiotics 11 00869 g002
Antibiotics 11 00869 g003 550
Figure 3. Comparison of the genetic environment of mcr-9 in different plasmids. Magenta arrows indicate resistance genes, blue arrows indicate insertion sequences, green arrows indicate identified ORFs, and gray arrows represent hypothetical genes. Shaded regions denote homologous regions (>95% nucleotide identity).
Figure 3. Comparison of the genetic environment of mcr-9 in different plasmids. Magenta arrows indicate resistance genes, blue arrows indicate insertion sequences, green arrows indicate identified ORFs, and gray arrows represent hypothetical genes. Shaded regions denote homologous regions (>95% nucleotide identity).
Antibiotics 11 00869 g003
Antibiotics 11 00869 g004 550
Figure 4. Evolutionary path between pEHZJ1 (CP033103), pYL4 (CP083755), and pIMP-26 (MH399264). The arrows indicate ORFs that have been confirmed or putatively confirmed and their orientations. Length of the arrow corresponds to the predicted ORF. The color code represents: replication initiation protein genes (orange), integrase genes (red), transposase genes and insertion elements (blue), antibiotic resistance genes (magenta), toxin-antitoxin system genes (yellow), heavy metal resistance genes (green), conjugal transfer genes (cray), putative, hypothetical, and other genes are represented by gray arrows. Shaded gray areas denote homologous regions with up to 95% nucleotide identity. When the shadow areas overlap, the color of the shaded region is darkened.
Figure 4. Evolutionary path between pEHZJ1 (CP033103), pYL4 (CP083755), and pIMP-26 (MH399264). The arrows indicate ORFs that have been confirmed or putatively confirmed and their orientations. Length of the arrow corresponds to the predicted ORF. The color code represents: replication initiation protein genes (orange), integrase genes (red), transposase genes and insertion elements (blue), antibiotic resistance genes (magenta), toxin-antitoxin system genes (yellow), heavy metal resistance genes (green), conjugal transfer genes (cray), putative, hypothetical, and other genes are represented by gray arrows. Shaded gray areas denote homologous regions with up to 95% nucleotide identity. When the shadow areas overlap, the color of the shaded region is darkened.
Antibiotics 11 00869 g004
Antibiotics 11 00869 g005 550
Figure 5. Structure of phage-like plasmid pYL4.2 carrying blaTEM-1B from S. marcescens isolate YL4. The arrows with different colors represent open reading frames (ORFs), with purple, orange, and blue representing mobile elements, resistance genes, and ORFs, respectively. Inner and outer circles correspond to average G+C content (black circle) and GC skew information (green and purple circles), respectively.
Figure 5. Structure of phage-like plasmid pYL4.2 carrying blaTEM-1B from S. marcescens isolate YL4. The arrows with different colors represent open reading frames (ORFs), with purple, orange, and blue representing mobile elements, resistance genes, and ORFs, respectively. Inner and outer circles correspond to average G+C content (black circle) and GC skew information (green and purple circles), respectively.
Antibiotics 11 00869 g005
Table
Table 1. Antimicrobial susceptibility of S. marcescens YL4 isolate.
Table 1. Antimicrobial susceptibility of S. marcescens YL4 isolate.
Antimicrobial ClassAntimicrobial AgentsMIC (μg/mL)SIR
CephalosporinsCefepime16≤24–8≥16
Ceftazidime≥64≤48≥16
Cefatriaxone≥64≤12≥4
β-lactam inhibitor combinationsTicarcillin/clavulanate≥128/2≤16/232/2–64/2≥128/2
CarbapenemsImipenem≥16≤12≥4
Meropenem≥16≤12≥4
Ertapenem≥8≤0.51≥2
AminoglycosidesTobramycin≥16≤48≥16
Amikacin16≤1632≥64
FluorquinolonesLevofloxacin4≤0.51≥2
Ciprofloxacin2≤0.250.5≥1
SulfanilamidesTrimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole≥16/304≤2/38-≥4/76
GlycylcyclineTigecycline≥8≤0.5--
MonobactamsAztreonam≥64≤48≥16
TetracyclinesMinocycline≥16≤48≥16
Doxycycline≥16≤48≥16
Table
Table 2. Antibiotic resistance genes in S. marcescens YL4.
Table 2. Antibiotic resistance genes in S. marcescens YL4.
LocationAntimicrobial AgentsResistant GenesIdentityAlignment Length/Gene LengthStartEnd
Chromosome of YL4 strain
(access No. CP083754)		Beta-lactamblaSRT-196.221137/1137775,741776,877
Tetracylinetet(41)93.571151/11821,054,1071,055,257
Aminoglycosideaac(6′)-Ic94.33441/4412,918,1802,918,620
Plasmid pYL4.1
(access No. CP083755)		Aminoglycosideaph(6)-Id100.0837/837168,510169,346
aph(3″)-Ib99.88804/804169,346170,149
aac(6′)-Ib3100.0555/555241,940242,494
Polymyxinmcr-9100.01620/1620158,061159,680
FosfomycinfosA5100.0420/420181,153181,572
Macrolidemph(A)100.0906/90666,78267,687
Folate pathway antagonistsul1100.0840/840189,399190,238
TetracyclinedfrA19100.0570/570195,200195,769
tet(D)100.01185/118570,46271,646
Beta-lactamblaTEM-1B100.0861/861175,551176,411
blaIMP-26100.0741/741192,691193,431
blaTEM-1B100.0861/861205,714206,574
blaSHV-12100.0861/861245,958246,818
Quaternary ammonium compoundqacE100.0282/333190,298190,579
AmphenicolcatA296.11642/642231,688232,329
Phage-like plasmid pYL4.2
(access No. CP083756)		Beta-lactamblaTEM-1B100.0861/86123,20224,062
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhong, Y.; Liu, W.; Yuan, P.; Yang, L.; Xu, Z.; Chen, D. Occurrence of Serratia marcescens Carrying blaIMP-26 and mcr-9 in Southern China: New Insights in the Evolution of Megaplasmid IMP-26. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 869. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070869

AMA Style

Zhong Y, Liu W, Yuan P, Yang L, Xu Z, Chen D. Occurrence of Serratia marcescens Carrying blaIMP-26 and mcr-9 in Southern China: New Insights in the Evolution of Megaplasmid IMP-26. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(7):869. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070869

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhong, Yuxia, Wanting Liu, Peibo Yuan, Ling Yang, Zhenbo Xu, and Dingqiang Chen. 2022. "Occurrence of Serratia marcescens Carrying blaIMP-26 and mcr-9 in Southern China: New Insights in the Evolution of Megaplasmid IMP-26" Antibiotics 11, no. 7: 869. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070869

APA Style

Zhong, Y., Liu, W., Yuan, P., Yang, L., Xu, Z., & Chen, D. (2022). Occurrence of Serratia marcescens Carrying blaIMP-26 and mcr-9 in Southern China: New Insights in the Evolution of Megaplasmid IMP-26. Antibiotics, 11(7), 869. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070869

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop