Next Article in Journal
Concentration-Dependent Activity of Pazufloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: An In Vivo Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Antibiotic Resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Potential Use of Natural and Biological Products as Alternative Anti-Mycobacterial Agents
Previous Article in Journal
Advocacy for Responsible Antibiotic Production and Use
Previous Article in Special Issue
Elevated Mortality Risk from CRKp Associated with Comorbidities: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Early Life Antimicrobial Exposure: Impact on Clostridioides difficile Colonization in Infants

Antibiotics 2022, 11(7), 981; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070981
by Chinwe Vivien Obiakor 1, Jaclyn Parks 2,3, Tim K. Takaro 2, Hein M. Tun 4,5,6, Nadia Morales-Lizcano 7, Meghan B. Azad 8, Piushkumar J. Mandhane 9, Theo J. Moraes 10, Elinor Simons 8, Stuart E. Turvey 11, Padmaja Subbarao 10, James A. Scott 7 and Anita L. Kozyrskyj 1,9,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Antibiotics 2022, 11(7), 981; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070981
Submission received: 10 June 2022 / Revised: 12 July 2022 / Accepted: 13 July 2022 / Published: 21 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotics in Health and Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This article by Obiakor et al. utilizes the extensive CHILD cohort database to present an interesting and well-written analysis of antibiotic use and household cleaner exposure in relation to infant gut colonization by C. difficile. The authors report increased colonization of C. difficile with infant antibiotic exposure at both 3-4 months and 12 months of age and several differences in microbiota relative abundances; differences associated with antibiotic use were exacerbated by high exposure to household cleaning agents. This analysis reveals important relationships between antibiotics and the potential for higher risk of C. difficile-related illness and future studies can confirm these changes in gut microbiota colonization are related to later-life health outcomes. This reviewer only has minor comments.

1. The variables included in each of the models listed in Tables 2, 3, and 4 are not entirely clear to me. Within each table, it seems that block 1 corresponds to model 1 and same for block 2 and model 2, with model 3 incorporating the variables from both block 1 and block 2. However, what variables are included in the final model? Does the final model include the significant variables for models 1, 2, or 3? Or are the variables in the final model listed in their respective DAGs? It would be helpful if the variables for each model were explicitly stated in the methods.

2. Why does Table 3 (12 month timepoint analysis) not include a model 3 in the analysis like Tables 2 and 4? It seems like a "model 3" could be built for Table 3, so I am curious as to why it was not included in the analysis.

 

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Please see attached comments.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

"Please see the attachment"

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop